|
|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Uranium |
| Revision as of 20:51, January 5, 2010 (edit) Isaac Middendorf - Sr. Director (Talk | contribs) (→Demand for Uranium Outstrips Supply) ← Previous diff |
Current revision (01:05, January 22, 2013) (edit) (undo) 10.10.12.6 (Talk) (→Who Loses From Rising Uranium Prices) |
||
| (25 intermediate revisions not shown.) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{commodity}} | {{commodity}} | ||
| - | Uranium is a metal whose only commercial use is as fuel for [[Nuclear Energy|nuclear power plants]], which provided around 16% of the world's electricity in 2007.<ref name=wna>[http://www.world-nuclear.org/education/uran.htm World Nuclear Association - What is uranium? How does it work?]</ref> Nuclear power is slowly making a comeback as an electricity source of choice in the U.S. market, reflected in the 17 applications filed since mid 2007 to build 26 new nuclear reactors.<ref>[http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/inf41.html World Nuclear Association - Nuclear Power in the USA]</ref> Also, in June of 2009 there was evidence of growing U.S. government support; the Energy Department said it would invest $18.5 billion in federal loan guarantees to four U.S. firms to help build a new generation of nuclear reactors.<ref>[http://www.marketwatch.com/story/four-firms-to-win-nuclear-power-financing-wsj?d=nbst Letzing, John, Four power companies are expected to split $18.5 billion in federal financing to help build a new generation of nuclear reactors, according to a report published late Tuesday. MarketWatch June 16, 2009]</ref> | + | Uranium is a metal whose most well known commercial use is as fuel for [[Nuclear Energy|nuclear power plants]], which provided around 16% of the world's electricity in 2007.<ref name=wna>[http://www.world-nuclear.org/education/uran.htm World Nuclear Association - What is uranium? How does it work?]</ref> (Other uses include counterweights for helicopters, ammunition and radiation shields. The exact use depends on the specific isotope.) Nuclear power is slowly making a comeback as an electricity source of choice in the U.S. market. At the middle of 2009, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) had received 17 applications for combined construction and operating licenses (COL) for 26 new nuclear reactors.<ref name=COL>[http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/inf41.html Nuclear Power in the USA, World Nuclear Association, Accessed on January 5, 2010]</ref> Also, in June of 2009 there was evidence of growing U.S. government support; the Energy Department said it would invest $18.5 billion in federal loan guarantees to four U.S. firms to help build a new generation of nuclear reactors.<ref>[http://www.marketwatch.com/story/four-firms-to-win-nuclear-power-financing-wsj?d=nbst Letzing, John, Four power companies are expected to split $18.5 billion in federal financing to help build a new generation of nuclear reactors, according to a report published late Tuesday. MarketWatch June 16, 2009]</ref> |
| - | Nuclear power is also likely to be key to the ongoing emergence of such economies as [[China]] and [[India]],<ref>[http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/24/china-india-see-nuclear-energy-as-essential-to-electricity-plan/ Blogging Stocks - China, India see nuclear energy as essential to electricity plan]</ref> seen in their goals to double their nuclear capacity within the next 5-10 years.<ref name=china/><ref>[http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/inf53.html World Nuclear Association - Nuclear Power in China]</ref> On the supply side, uranium production has been growing at a snail's pace, the major players have started locking up long term supply, and [[Russia]] and the U.S. have slowed down their refined uranium sales programs.<ref name=sell1/><ref name=sell2/> As a result, demand for uranium has outstripped supply for every year since 1989.<ref name=super2/> Despite all this, uranium prices fell 40% from October 07 to March 09.<ref>[http://www.mineweb.com/mineweb/view/mineweb/en/page38?oid=63616&sn=Detail Mineweb - Uranium prices fall again as credit crunch bites]</ref><ref>[http://www.uxc.com/review/uxc_Prices.aspx UxC - Ux Price Indicators]</ref> The global [[financial crisis]] is to blame - nuclear power plants represent huge capital investments, and demand for electricity is driven by business activity. With cheap [[credit]] a luxury of the past, raising billions of dollars for projects that won't start earning for at least six years has become very difficult.<ref>[http://www.mineweb.com/mineweb/view/mineweb/en/page38?oid=63616&sn=Detail Mineweb - Uranium prices fall again as credit crunch bites]</ref> Still, expecting the nuclear industry to partially recover, analyst estimates compiled by Bloomberg in April of 2009 forecast that uranium prices will rise 30% by the end of the year.<ref>[http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&sid=aLd4oK0Xkk9g&refer=news Bloomberg - Copper’s Declining Demand Pushes Prices 21% Lower]</ref> | + | Nuclear power is also likely to be key to the ongoing emergence of such economies as [[China]] and [[India]],<ref>[http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/24/china-india-see-nuclear-energy-as-essential-to-electricity-plan/ Blogging Stocks - China, India see nuclear energy as essential to electricity plan]</ref> seen in their goals to double their nuclear capacity within the next 5-10 years.<ref>[http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/inf53.html World Nuclear Association - Nuclear Power in China]</ref> On the supply side, uranium production has been growing at a snail's pace, the major players have started locking up long term supply, and [[Russia]] and the U.S. have slowed down their refined uranium sales programs.<ref name=sell1/><ref name=sell2/> As a result, demand for uranium has outstripped supply for every year since 1989.<ref name=super2/> Despite all this, uranium prices fell 40% from October 07 to March 09.<ref>[http://www.mineweb.com/mineweb/view/mineweb/en/page38?oid=63616&sn=Detail Mineweb - Uranium prices fall again as credit crunch bites]</ref><ref>[http://www.uxc.com/review/uxc_Prices.aspx UxC - Ux Price Indicators]</ref> The global [[financial crisis]] is to blame - nuclear power plants represent huge capital investments, and demand for electricity is driven by business activity. With cheap [[credit]] a luxury of the past, raising billions of dollars for projects that won't start earning for at least six years has become very difficult.<ref>[http://www.mineweb.com/mineweb/view/mineweb/en/page38?oid=63616&sn=Detail Mineweb - Uranium prices fall again as credit crunch bites]</ref> Still, expecting the nuclear industry to partially recover, analyst estimates compiled by Bloomberg in April of 2009 forecast that uranium prices will rise 30% by the end of the year.<ref>[http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&sid=aLd4oK0Xkk9g&refer=news Bloomberg - Copper’s Declining Demand Pushes Prices 21% Lower]</ref> |
| ''The chart at left shows continuos [[front-month]] futures prices for Uranium traded on the [[NYMEX]].'' | ''The chart at left shows continuos [[front-month]] futures prices for Uranium traded on the [[NYMEX]].'' | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
| *Uranium exploration companies like [[Hathor Exploration (V-HAT-TSX)]] and [[Uracan Resources (V-URC-TSX)]] benefit, as their finds become more valuable. | *Uranium exploration companies like [[Hathor Exploration (V-HAT-TSX)]] and [[Uracan Resources (V-URC-TSX)]] benefit, as their finds become more valuable. | ||
| - | *Uranium production companies benefit the most from high uranium prices. In 2007, over 85% of the estimated world production of U3O8 uranium came from seven companies: [[Cameco (CCJ)]] (19%), [[Rio Tinto (RTP)]] (17%), [[Areva (ARVCF.PK)]] (15%), KazAtomProm (12% - Khazakstani), ARMZ (8%), [[BHP Billiton (BHP)]] (8%), and NAVOI Mining Metallurgical Kombinat (6% - Uzbekistani).<ref name=percent>[http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/inf23.html World Nuclear Association - World Uranium Mining]</ref> Other players include Cogema, [[Energy Resources of Australia (ERA-ASX)]], [[Uranium One (UUU-TSX)]] , [[General Electric Company (GE)]], and Priargunsky Industrial Mining and Chemical Enterprise (Russian). | + | *Uranium production companies benefit the most from high uranium prices. In 2007, over 85% of the estimated world production of U3O8 uranium came from seven companies: [[Cameco (CCJ)]] (20%), [[Rio Tinto (RTP)]] (17%), [[Areva (ARVCF.PK)]] (15%), KazAtomProm (12% - Khazakstani), ARMZ (8%), [[BHP Billiton (BHP)]] (8%), and NAVOI Mining Metallurgical Kombinat (6% - Uzbekistani).<ref name=percent>[http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/inf23.html World Nuclear Association - World Uranium Mining]</ref> Other players include Cogema, [[Energy Resources of Australia (ERA-ASX)]], [[Uranium One (UUU-TSX)]] , [[General Electric Company (GE)]], and Priargunsky Industrial Mining and Chemical Enterprise (Russian). |
| *Other sources of fuel for electricity production like [[coal]] and [[natural gas]] all see increases in demand when the price of nuclear energy, one of their largest alternatives, increases. | *Other sources of fuel for electricity production like [[coal]] and [[natural gas]] all see increases in demand when the price of nuclear energy, one of their largest alternatives, increases. | ||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
| ==Who Loses From Rising Uranium Prices== | ==Who Loses From Rising Uranium Prices== | ||
| - | *[[Exelon]], [[Dominion Resources]], [[Entergy]], [[Duke Energy Corporation]], [[Constellation Energy Group (CEG)]], [[FPL Group (FPL)]], and [[Southern Company (SO)]], operators of nuclear power plants in the U.S., would not benefit from rising fuel expenses, as regulators may take their time or not even decide to raise prices. | + | *[[Exelon]], [[Dominion Resources]], [[Entergy]], [[Duke Energy Corporation (DUK)]], [[Constellation Energy Group (CEG)]], [[FPL Group (FPL)]], and [[Southern Company (SO)]], operators of nuclear power plants in the U.S., would not benefit from rising fuel expenses, as regulators may take their time or not even decide to raise prices. |
| *Nuclear power plant manufacturers and maintenance companies Westinghouse Electric, [[Shaw Group (SGR)]], [[Fluor (FLR)]], and Bechtel see smaller demand for new power plants when their product becomes more expense to fuel. However, nuclear power plants are more than 30-60 year investments - short term fluctuations in uranium prices only marginally impact their business.<ref>[http://www.leonardo-energy.org/drupal/node/1530 Leonardo Energy - Life expectancy of nuclear power plants]</ref> | *Nuclear power plant manufacturers and maintenance companies Westinghouse Electric, [[Shaw Group (SGR)]], [[Fluor (FLR)]], and Bechtel see smaller demand for new power plants when their product becomes more expense to fuel. However, nuclear power plants are more than 30-60 year investments - short term fluctuations in uranium prices only marginally impact their business.<ref>[http://www.leonardo-energy.org/drupal/node/1530 Leonardo Energy - Life expectancy of nuclear power plants]</ref> | ||
| - | |||
| - | ==Uranium Mining Overview== | ||
| - | The major stages in the production of nuclear fuel are: | ||
| - | * Exploration | ||
| - | * Mining and milling | ||
| - | * Refining and conversion | ||
| - | * Enrichment and fuel fabrication (fuel manufacturing) | ||
| - | |||
| - | Similar to oil, mining companies generally explore for the largest concentrations of uranium. Though uranium itself is not scarce on Earth, only a small number of these concentrated deposits have been discovered worldwide. | ||
| - | |||
| - | With prices escalating, uranium-mining companies are eager to cultivate the material; though it generatlly takes seven to 10 years to find and bring a uranium discovery into production. That explains why uranium-mining production was only projected to increase 9% in 2007 over 2006.<ref>[http://www.moneymorning.com/reports/uranium.html Money Morning Report]</ref> | ||
| - | |||
| - | [[Mining]] companies will typically sell uranium concentrates to utility companies, which then turn the fuel into electricity for consumption. | ||
| - | |||
| - | The [[Concept:Uranium Prices|world production of uranium]] in 2007 was approximately 107 million pounds of U3O8,<ref name=countries>[http://www.uranium.info/index.cfm?go=c.page&id=48 TradeTech - World Uranium Production & Requirements]</ref> 90% of which came from eight countries,<ref name=countries/> which are, in order of greatest to least production: | ||
| - | * [[Canada]] (25 million pounds, 23% of world production) | ||
| - | * [[Australia]] | ||
| - | * [[Kazakhstan]] | ||
| - | * [[Russia]] | ||
| - | * [[Niger]] | ||
| - | * [[Namibia]] | ||
| - | * [[Uzbekistan]] | ||
| - | * [[United States]] | ||
| ==Drivers of Uranium Prices== | ==Drivers of Uranium Prices== | ||
| === Demand for Uranium Outstrips Supply === | === Demand for Uranium Outstrips Supply === | ||
| [[Image:Uraniumspotprices.jpg|400px|right]] | [[Image:Uraniumspotprices.jpg|400px|right]] | ||
| - | [[Image:world_uranium.jpg|thumb|400px|right| Source: World Nuclear Association<ref name=wna/>]] | + | [[Image:Uraniumnetproduction.png|thumb|400px|right| Source: World Nuclear Association and Metals Economics Group<ref name=meg/>]] |
| - | Every year since 1985, the [[Nuclear Energy|world's consumption of uranium]] has been greater than its production.<ref name=uran/> In 2006, uranium producers met only 62% of worldwide demand. To help meet this shortfall, reprocessed uranium and plutonium from the dismantling of Russian and U.S. nuclear weapons has been used.<ref name=cnn/> The World Nuclear Association estimates that uranium mining will need to increase by almost 300% in the next two decades.<ref name=cnn>[http://money.cnn.com/2008/03/26/news/international/uranium_kazakhstan.fortune/ CNN: "Nuclear power's white-hot metal"]</ref> | + | Every year since 1985, the [[Nuclear Energy|world's consumption of uranium]] has been greater than its production.<ref name=uran>[http://www.uranlimited.com.au/old/aboutUranium3.html About Uranium: World Market]</ref> In 2008, uranium producers met only 66% of worldwide demand. To help meet this shortfall, reprocessed uranium and plutonium from the dismantling of Russian and U.S. nuclear weapons has been used.<ref name=countries/><ref name=cnn/> The World Nuclear Association estimates that uranium mining will need to increase by almost 300% in the next two decades.<ref name=cnn>[http://money.cnn.com/2008/03/26/news/international/uranium_kazakhstan.fortune/ CNN: "Nuclear power's white-hot metal"]</ref> |
| The Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics estimates that uranium prices will rise 22% from $46.4 in 2009 to $56.7 in 2010 due to the widening gap between uranium supply and demand.<ref>[http://www.businessinsider.com/uranium-demand-will-outstrip-supply-in-2010-2009-11 Uranium Demand Could Outstrip Supply For Three Years Straight (CCJ)]</ref> NYMEX Uranium futures for December 2010 are in the $48.50 range. | The Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics estimates that uranium prices will rise 22% from $46.4 in 2009 to $56.7 in 2010 due to the widening gap between uranium supply and demand.<ref>[http://www.businessinsider.com/uranium-demand-will-outstrip-supply-in-2010-2009-11 Uranium Demand Could Outstrip Supply For Three Years Straight (CCJ)]</ref> NYMEX Uranium futures for December 2010 are in the $48.50 range. | ||
| Line 69: | Line 46: | ||
| *In France, the construction of a second European Pressured Water Reactor is expected to begin in 2012.<ref name=euro/> | *In France, the construction of a second European Pressured Water Reactor is expected to begin in 2012.<ref name=euro/> | ||
| *South Korea’s generation blueprint anticipates that by 2020 roughly half the country's electricity will be nuclear-generated.<ref name=euro/> | *South Korea’s generation blueprint anticipates that by 2020 roughly half the country's electricity will be nuclear-generated.<ref name=euro/> | ||
| - | *At the end of 2008, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) had received 17 applications for combined construction and operating licenses (COL) for 26 new nuclear reactors.<ref name=mda/> | + | *At the middle of 2009, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) had received 17 applications for combined construction and operating licenses (COL) for 26 new nuclear reactors.<ref name=COL/> |
| ===Factors Affecting Demand=== | ===Factors Affecting Demand=== | ||
| Line 78: | Line 55: | ||
| New nuclear power plants are very safe,<ref name=safe>[http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/inf06.html World Nuclear Association - Safety of Nuclear Power Reactors]</ref> and in a bid to combat global warming and keep up with soaring demand for electricity, countries are rushing to build [[nuclear power]] plants. As of October 2008, there were 439 nuclear reactors in operation that generate about 15% of the world's electricity.<ref name=nuclearinfo>[http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/reactors.html World Nuclear Association - World Nuclear Power Reactors 2007-08 and Uranium Requirements]</ref> In September 2007, 16 were under construction, 34 were on order and 86 were proposed.<ref>[http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/reactors.html World Nuclear Association - World Nuclear Power Reactors 2006-07 and Uranium Requirements]</ref> A year later, 26 were under construction, 99 were on order, and 232 have been proposed.<ref name=nuclearinfo/> That uranium prices have fallen 40% from October 2007 to October 2008, shows that the market expects large delays and cancellations. | New nuclear power plants are very safe,<ref name=safe>[http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/inf06.html World Nuclear Association - Safety of Nuclear Power Reactors]</ref> and in a bid to combat global warming and keep up with soaring demand for electricity, countries are rushing to build [[nuclear power]] plants. As of October 2008, there were 439 nuclear reactors in operation that generate about 15% of the world's electricity.<ref name=nuclearinfo>[http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/reactors.html World Nuclear Association - World Nuclear Power Reactors 2007-08 and Uranium Requirements]</ref> In September 2007, 16 were under construction, 34 were on order and 86 were proposed.<ref>[http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/reactors.html World Nuclear Association - World Nuclear Power Reactors 2006-07 and Uranium Requirements]</ref> A year later, 26 were under construction, 99 were on order, and 232 have been proposed.<ref name=nuclearinfo/> That uranium prices have fallen 40% from October 2007 to October 2008, shows that the market expects large delays and cancellations. | ||
| - | ====[[China's Energy Appetite|China's Energy Appetite]]==== | + | ====China and India's Uranium Demand==== |
| - | As one of the least expensive energy sources on a per unit basis, [[nuclear energy]] will see increases in demand as the appetite for energy in large growing economies increase. China has announced its intention to increase nuclear energy production in its country 455% by 2020, and 1677% by 2030.<ref name=china>[http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/inf63.html World Nuclear Association - Nuclear Power in China]</ref> | + | In 2009 Indian reactor demand for uranium was estimated at about 3 million pounds and is expected to rise to as much as 10 million pounds in 15 years.<ref name=bloombergindia>[http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601082&sid=a2_TiMJslNUQ Bloomberg: Cameco Will Open Office in India as Uranium Demand May Triple]</ref> India has 17 reactors operating and six under construction, and another 23 reactors are expected to come on line in the next eight years. China has 11 reactors operating, 16 under construction and 35 new plants expected to come on line within the next eight years. China's uranium demand is expected to grow 4-6 times by 2020, as the country increases its annual installed nuclear power capacity to 40 million kilowatts from 9 million present.<ref>[http://www.forbes.com/feeds/afx/2007/05/17/afx3730966.html China's uranium demand for nuclear power to rise 4-6 times by 2020]</ref> The sharp increase in the demand for uranium from India and China will continue to raise the price of uranium. |
| ====Cost of Coal & Natural Gas==== | ====Cost of Coal & Natural Gas==== | ||
| As the price of coal and natural gas increase, electricity production based on traditional sources of fuel becomes more expensive. Nevertheless, [[nuclear energy]] is still the most expensive of the three.<ref name=comparison>[http://www.nrdc.org/nuclear/pnucpwr.asp Natural Resources Defense Council - The Future Role of Nuclear Power in the United States]</ref> Several things could change that. One, government incentives have and will continue to make the construction and operation of select nuclear plants profitable. Two, the implementation of carbon taxes or a [[carbon trading]] scheme (as President Barack Obama has suggested)<ref>[http://ictsd.net/i/news/bridgesweekly/33951/ International Centre for Trade And Development - Obama Calls for Carbon Trading Scheme, Vows Strong Action on Climate]</ref> would make nuclear energy significantly cheaper than fossil fuels.<ref name=comparison/> | As the price of coal and natural gas increase, electricity production based on traditional sources of fuel becomes more expensive. Nevertheless, [[nuclear energy]] is still the most expensive of the three.<ref name=comparison>[http://www.nrdc.org/nuclear/pnucpwr.asp Natural Resources Defense Council - The Future Role of Nuclear Power in the United States]</ref> Several things could change that. One, government incentives have and will continue to make the construction and operation of select nuclear plants profitable. Two, the implementation of carbon taxes or a [[carbon trading]] scheme (as President Barack Obama has suggested)<ref>[http://ictsd.net/i/news/bridgesweekly/33951/ International Centre for Trade And Development - Obama Calls for Carbon Trading Scheme, Vows Strong Action on Climate]</ref> would make nuclear energy significantly cheaper than fossil fuels.<ref name=comparison/> | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===Alternative energy competes with nuclear energy=== | ||
| + | [[Wind Energy|Wind]], [[hydroelectric energy]], and [[Solar Power|solar energy]] all compete with nuclear power for a share of the alternative energy market. In 2008, production costs were 8.8 cents (U.S.) per kilowatt hour for nuclear, 7.4 cents (U.S.) for coal, and 10.6 cents (U.S.) for natural gas.<ref name=abc/> Though renewable energy sources will need to become more affordable and more widely adopted in order to become a more serious competitor to uranium, advances in technology are making investment in renewable energy more attractive. | ||
| + | |||
| + | {| class="toccolours" border="1" cellpadding="3" style="border-collapse:collapse" | ||
| + | |+ '''Power Generation Costs for Various Energy Sources in 2008'''<ref name=abc>[http://www.meic.org/energy/global_warming_pollution/renewable-energy-alternatives-1/wind_cost Montana Environmental Information Center]</ref> | ||
| + | |- bgcolor= lightblue | ||
| + | ! | ||
| + | !Fixed Cost (cents/kWh) | ||
| + | !Variable Cost (cents/kWh) | ||
| + | !Total Cost (cents/kWh) | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |Coal | ||
| + | |4.1 | ||
| + | |3.3 | ||
| + | |7.4 | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |Natural gas | ||
| + | |2.8 | ||
| + | |7.8 | ||
| + | |10.6 | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |Nuclear | ||
| + | |8.0 | ||
| + | |0.8 | ||
| + | |8.8 | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |Wind | ||
| + | |8.2 | ||
| + | |0.0 | ||
| + | |8.2 | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |} | ||
| + | |||
| + | {| class="toccolours" border="1" cellpadding="3" style="border-collapse:collapse" | ||
| + | |+ '''Energy Return by Source in 2008'''<ref name=10k22>[http://www.suzlon.com/Publication.aspx?cp=3_1 Suzlon FY 07-08 Annual Report, Management Discussion and Analysis, p. 5]</ref> | ||
| + | |- bgcolor= lightblue | ||
| + | ! | ||
| + | !Energy return on Energy Invested | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |Coal-fired power plant | ||
| + | |2.5 | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |Nuclear power | ||
| + | |4.5 | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |Hydroelectric power | ||
| + | |10 | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |Wind power | ||
| + | |35 | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |Natural gas | ||
| + | |10.3 | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |} | ||
| ====Alternative Energy Is Becoming Cheaper==== | ====Alternative Energy Is Becoming Cheaper==== | ||
| Line 93: | Line 126: | ||
| ====Nuclear Weapons==== | ====Nuclear Weapons==== | ||
| Because nuclear weapons contain ultra-enriched uranium, a single ton of military high-enriched uranium is equivalent to 350 tons of uranium oxide.<ref name=supply/> Since 2000, uranium from the U.S. and former countries of the USSR has provided 13% of the world's uranium requirements.<ref name=supply>[http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/inf75.html World Nuclear - Supply of Uranium]</ref> However, Russia's supply is slated to end around 2013,<ref name=sell2>[http://www.miningweekly.com/print_version.php?a_id=110948 Mining Weekly - South Africa seen as pivotal source of uranium supply]</ref> and the U.S. has started to downsize its uranium selling program.<ref name=sell1>[http://www.stockinterview.com/News/05072007/DOE-uranium-sales-this-year.html StockInterview.com - U.S. Government May Sell ‘Very Small’ Amount of Uranium in 2007]</ref> | Because nuclear weapons contain ultra-enriched uranium, a single ton of military high-enriched uranium is equivalent to 350 tons of uranium oxide.<ref name=supply/> Since 2000, uranium from the U.S. and former countries of the USSR has provided 13% of the world's uranium requirements.<ref name=supply>[http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/inf75.html World Nuclear - Supply of Uranium]</ref> However, Russia's supply is slated to end around 2013,<ref name=sell2>[http://www.miningweekly.com/print_version.php?a_id=110948 Mining Weekly - South Africa seen as pivotal source of uranium supply]</ref> and the U.S. has started to downsize its uranium selling program.<ref name=sell1>[http://www.stockinterview.com/News/05072007/DOE-uranium-sales-this-year.html StockInterview.com - U.S. Government May Sell ‘Very Small’ Amount of Uranium in 2007]</ref> | ||
| + | |||
| + | ====Lower Inventory Supplies and Higher Prices==== | ||
| + | Traditionally 20-40% less than consumption (last 25 years), production is closing the gap enabled by positive pressures on uranium prices (which directly affect the rate at which new projects are developed) and declining inventory supplies/sales. Between 2007 and 2010 primary production rose 25%.<ref name=meg>{{cite web|url=http://www.metalseconomics.com/pdf/Uranium%20Supply%20Pipeline%202010.pdf|title=Uranium miners respond to supply deficit by increasing mine production|date=2010-09-08}}</ref> | ||
| ==Notes== | ==Notes== | ||
|
Error creating thumbnail: convert: unable to open image `/home/wikinvest/src_live_1/mediawiki/images/1/15/Commodity.bmp': No such file or directory @ blob.c/OpenBlob/2480. convert: missing an image filename `/home/wikinvest/src_live_1/mediawiki/images/thumb/1/15/Commodity.bmp/40px-Commodity.bmp.png' @ convert.c/ConvertImageCommand/2800. |
This article describes a commodity traded on a commodities exchange. View articles referencing this commodity. |
Uranium is a metal whose most well known commercial use is as fuel for nuclear power plants, which provided around 16% of the world's electricity in 2007.[1] (Other uses include counterweights for helicopters, ammunition and radiation shields. The exact use depends on the specific isotope.) Nuclear power is slowly making a comeback as an electricity source of choice in the U.S. market. At the middle of 2009, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) had received 17 applications for combined construction and operating licenses (COL) for 26 new nuclear reactors.[2] Also, in June of 2009 there was evidence of growing U.S. government support; the Energy Department said it would invest $18.5 billion in federal loan guarantees to four U.S. firms to help build a new generation of nuclear reactors.[3]
Nuclear power is also likely to be key to the ongoing emergence of such economies as China and India,[4] seen in their goals to double their nuclear capacity within the next 5-10 years.[5] On the supply side, uranium production has been growing at a snail's pace, the major players have started locking up long term supply, and Russia and the U.S. have slowed down their refined uranium sales programs.[6][7] As a result, demand for uranium has outstripped supply for every year since 1989.[8] Despite all this, uranium prices fell 40% from October 07 to March 09.[9][10] The global financial crisis is to blame - nuclear power plants represent huge capital investments, and demand for electricity is driven by business activity. With cheap credit a luxury of the past, raising billions of dollars for projects that won't start earning for at least six years has become very difficult.[11] Still, expecting the nuclear industry to partially recover, analyst estimates compiled by Bloomberg in April of 2009 forecast that uranium prices will rise 30% by the end of the year.[12]
The chart at left shows continuos front-month futures prices for Uranium traded on the NYMEX.
Contents |
Prices, Ticker, Delivery DatesUranium Futures contracts are traded on the New York Mercantile Exchange under ticker symbol UX and are delivered in every month of the year. (For more information on commodity tickers, check out the commodity ticker construction page.)
Uranium spot prices have increased dramatically since 2003, when the commodity was under $10 per pound. Its peak spot price in 2007 was over $125 per pound and have since fallen to $50 as of November 2008.
Most utility companies secure a significant percent of their uranium fuel through long-term (i.e., multi-year) contracts with companies such as CCJ. These contracts are often priced in accordance to market conditions with uranium spot prices (i.e., short-term purchases for uranium within one year).
Who Benefits From Rising Uranium Prices
Who Loses From Rising Uranium Prices
Drivers of Uranium Prices
Demand for Uranium Outstrips Supply Every year since 1985, the world's consumption of uranium has been greater than its production.[18] In 2008, uranium producers met only 66% of worldwide demand. To help meet this shortfall, reprocessed uranium and plutonium from the dismantling of Russian and U.S. nuclear weapons has been used.[19][20] The World Nuclear Association estimates that uranium mining will need to increase by almost 300% in the next two decades.[20] The Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics estimates that uranium prices will rise 22% from $46.4 in 2009 to $56.7 in 2010 due to the widening gap between uranium supply and demand.[21] NYMEX Uranium futures for December 2010 are in the $48.50 range.
As of January 2009, there were 436 nuclear reactors operating worldwide and a total of 115 reactors under construction or planned for completion by 2020.[22] The demand for processed uranium continues to rise as countries throughout the world increase their reliance on nuclear energy for electricity:
Factors Affecting Demand
The Global Economy Is SlowingNuclear energy is expensive. Said in 2005 by the CEO of Dominion Resources, "A new 1,400-megawatt nuclear power plant is going to cost about $2.6 billion. It is going to take 6 1/2 years to build. While you are building, you have to issue equity, you have to service that equity. You have to issue bonds; you have to service the bonds with interest. You don't have any money coming in. You have an average of $1.3 billion out for 6 1/2 years that is not earning anything."[23]. This was said 2 years before the credit crunch, and 3 years before the credit collapse. Now, the cost of borrowing $2.6 billion is going to be much higher. Furthermore, with economies across the globe slowing down, demand growth for electricity is falling off. The combination of the two makes nuclear power plants a bad investment, which is why uranium prices have been falling at a record pace - from $138 in July 07[24] to $45 in October 08.[25]
Nuclear Energy Is Gaining Acceptance as a Clean, Reliable AlternativeNew nuclear power plants are very safe,[26] and in a bid to combat global warming and keep up with soaring demand for electricity, countries are rushing to build nuclear power plants. As of October 2008, there were 439 nuclear reactors in operation that generate about 15% of the world's electricity.[27] In September 2007, 16 were under construction, 34 were on order and 86 were proposed.[28] A year later, 26 were under construction, 99 were on order, and 232 have been proposed.[27] That uranium prices have fallen 40% from October 2007 to October 2008, shows that the market expects large delays and cancellations.
China and India's Uranium DemandIn 2009 Indian reactor demand for uranium was estimated at about 3 million pounds and is expected to rise to as much as 10 million pounds in 15 years.[29] India has 17 reactors operating and six under construction, and another 23 reactors are expected to come on line in the next eight years. China has 11 reactors operating, 16 under construction and 35 new plants expected to come on line within the next eight years. China's uranium demand is expected to grow 4-6 times by 2020, as the country increases its annual installed nuclear power capacity to 40 million kilowatts from 9 million present.[30] The sharp increase in the demand for uranium from India and China will continue to raise the price of uranium.
Cost of Coal & Natural GasAs the price of coal and natural gas increase, electricity production based on traditional sources of fuel becomes more expensive. Nevertheless, nuclear energy is still the most expensive of the three.[31] Several things could change that. One, government incentives have and will continue to make the construction and operation of select nuclear plants profitable. Two, the implementation of carbon taxes or a carbon trading scheme (as President Barack Obama has suggested)[32] would make nuclear energy significantly cheaper than fossil fuels.[31]
Alternative energy competes with nuclear energyWind, hydroelectric energy, and solar energy all compete with nuclear power for a share of the alternative energy market. In 2008, production costs were 8.8 cents (U.S.) per kilowatt hour for nuclear, 7.4 cents (U.S.) for coal, and 10.6 cents (U.S.) for natural gas.[33] Though renewable energy sources will need to become more affordable and more widely adopted in order to become a more serious competitor to uranium, advances in technology are making investment in renewable energy more attractive.
| Fixed Cost (cents/kWh) | Variable Cost (cents/kWh) | Total Cost (cents/kWh) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coal | 4.1 | 3.3 | 7.4 |
| Natural gas | 2.8 | 7.8 | 10.6 |
| Nuclear | 8.0 | 0.8 | 8.8 |
| Wind | 8.2 | 0.0 | 8.2 |
| Energy return on Energy Invested | |
|---|---|
| Coal-fired power plant | 2.5 |
| Nuclear power | 4.5 |
| Hydroelectric power | 10 |
| Wind power | 35 |
| Natural gas | 10.3 |
Alternative Energy Is Becoming CheaperWith every passing day coal power, wind energy, hydroelectricity and solar power all become more cost efficient and eco-friendly. Nuclear energy is still the cheapest renewable source of energy.[35] That lead won't last forever though. New technological developments are making the most viable of the competition, solar energy and wind energy, cheaper every year.[36] However, it'll take a very long time until widespread reliance on alternative energy will be possible. Even the most optimistic projections by the Energy Information Administration (EIA) don't see more than the addition of a couple gigawatts of renewable energy capacity over the next ten years.[37]
Factors Affecting Supply
Growing Economies Are Locking Up SupplyAs the importance of securing renewable sources of energy rises, uranium is becoming more valuable. China is involved with long term deals that would effectively take Kazakhstan and some African countries out of the uranium production market.[38] Russia has stopped selling its uranium at market prices, and is now building up large stockpiles for future use.[39] Russia has also started signing deals with Australia, one of the two largest producers of uranium in the world.[8] China isn't leaving Australia for Russia though, having made a multi-billion dollar deal themselves.[39] Although these deals will take large supply off of the market, it will also take large demand with it. However, in a market where demand outstrips supply, these deals will take out a higher percentage of supply than demand, pushing the price of uranium upwards.
Nuclear WeaponsBecause nuclear weapons contain ultra-enriched uranium, a single ton of military high-enriched uranium is equivalent to 350 tons of uranium oxide.[40] Since 2000, uranium from the U.S. and former countries of the USSR has provided 13% of the world's uranium requirements.[40] However, Russia's supply is slated to end around 2013,[7] and the U.S. has started to downsize its uranium selling program.[6]
Lower Inventory Supplies and Higher PricesTraditionally 20-40% less than consumption (last 25 years), production is closing the gap enabled by positive pressures on uranium prices (which directly affect the rate at which new projects are developed) and declining inventory supplies/sales. Between 2007 and 2010 primary production rose 25%.[17]
Notes
| |||||||