China's Piracy & Counterfeiting Problems

The Economist  Jan 11  Comment 
IN JUST a few short years Spotify has evolved from bête noir of some of the world’s most prominent recording artists to perhaps their greatest benefactor. The Swedish company transformed the way people listen to music, and got them used to...
The Hindu Business Line  Nov 27  Comment 
Digital piracy remains ‘most popular way of consuming music’
New York Times  Jul 6  Comment 
The viral media company, known for repackaging the content of others, has accused its rival 22 Words of “digital piracy and plagiarism” in a lawsuit.
New York Times  May 20  Comment 
Years after Napster, musicians are still victims of digital piracy, but now it is companies like Google and SiriusXM that make the theft possible.
Forbes  Nov 27  Comment 
We’ve heard it for a decade now. “We’re losing more than half  our music sales thanks to digital piracy,” proclaims the music industrial complex. The problem is that the music industry has freaked itself out so continually over hyped-up...
New York Times  Aug 18  Comment 
The move should also help Baidu regain ground against two other Chinese Internet giants, Alibaba and Tencent, which were quicker to add mobile capabilities.     
Automotive World  Jan 3  Comment 
In October 2012, the US Department of Transportation’s National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) issued a consumer safety advisory to alert vehicle owners and repair professionals to the dangers of counterfeit airbags. NHTSA had...
Forbes  Nov 2  Comment 
The movie business has finally figured out a way to combat piracy in China: Cut the locals in on the deal. One slick-talking New Yorker serves as gatekeeper--and lightning rod.
Sydney Morning Herald  Oct 29  Comment 
It's a wildly popular website laden with unlicensed songs and Hollywood movies, a prime exhibit of the digital piracy that is strangling the music industry in Asia and eroding legitimate online sales around the world.
New York Times  Jul 4  Comment 
Opponents said the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement, designed to crack down on digital piracy, was not democratic.


China's inability to safeguard intellectual property rights limits the manufacturing of high-end technology goods in China and erodes the value of brand names because the public confuses their products with shoddy counterfeits. Because many U.S. exports contain a high degree of proprietary intellectual property, China's failure to sufficiently enforce intellectual property laws may yield a major trade dispute.

Intellectual property rights in China are predominantly honored in the breach. And intellectual property theft in China has a far greater impact than a first glance would suggest. Commercial piracy extends far beyond the rampant proliferation of bootleg DVDs and CDs. In fact, many basic physical goods are greatly impacted by commercial counterfeits in China. For example, leading Western consumer goods firms, many of whom have spent tens of millions of dollar building their brand in China, regularly see knock-offs of their products appearing throughout the country – resulting in a loss of market share, a loss in sales, and a cheapening of their brand in the eyes of a consumer who buys a shoddy knockoff without any awareness that it is fake. Luxury goods manufacturers are especially at risk.

From an investment trends perspective, developments in China’s intellectual property protection regime have several important effects, ranging from lost profits to impacts on foreign direct investment, long-term productivity growth, and whether the country can move up-market in its technology and production.

What Companies are Hurt Most by Digital Media Piracy

Companies developing software, entertainment, intellectual property, or with name-brand recognition all stand to lose from piracy.

  • Pharmaceutical companies selling mass market drugs in Asia, Africa, and Latin America are harmed by exports of Chinese counterfeit drugs. The most endangered are makers of mass-market drugs like Viagra and Lipitor (from Pfizer (PFE)), Propecia by Merck (MRK), and Nexium by ASTRAZENECA (AZN).

Who Wins?

Domestic manufacturers and suppliers can benefit initially from copying other software or content but ultimately will face the same problem themselves from smaller competitors if they develop into a larger player.

Fighting Chinese piracy does create a few winners. Investigation firms like Kroll (a division of Marsh & McClennan), Securitas's Pinkerton, and Dun & Bradstreet.

Another winner thus far from piracy may be Chinese search engine Baidu. Baidu offered an MP3 search capability to let Chinese Internet users find songs online, regardless of whether such songs were posted illegally. Analysts suggest this feature greatly enhanced Baidu's popularity.

Companies that sell software, but reap the larger share of their revenue by charging for online community access or transactions are benefited by piracy because it spreads the software that users need to become paying members of the online community. Massive multiplayer online role playing games, such as Everquest (from Sony) and Worlds of Warcraft (from Vivendi) win when users pay their monthly fee, regardless of whether they bought the underlying software. Likewise, even if electronic storefront software is pirated, online exchanges like EBay (EBAY) still gain from transaction fees.

The Cost of Private Battles

The pursuit of pirates and counterfeits is expensive. Because Chinese law enforcement may not pursue such cases aggressively, often aggrieved Western companies will hire their own private detective to gather evidence of the counterfeiting, trace its source, and then bring a civil suit in China’s court system. However nearly 80% of U.S. firms that export to China are small and medium sized enterprises, rather than Fortune 500 companies. The cost of hiring private detectives and waging a lengthy legal battle in the Chinese court system can be particularly daunting to businesses of that size.

Large exporters to China, despite having deeper pockets to fight pirates, are also larger targets because pirates want to leverage the brand name of larger companies. Pharmaceutical industry experts, for example, estimate that China is the source of thirty percent of all counterfeit drugs produced worldwide, with a particular emphasis on bestsellers like Pfizer's Viagra. Similarly, well-known auto parts manufacturers face billions of dollars of Chinese counterfeits each year – resulting in both reduced sales and damage to their own brand name.

Trade War

On April 9, 2007, U.S. Trade Representative Susan Schwab announced that the United States will begin World Trade Organization (WTO) dispute settlement consultations with the People’s Republic of China over 1) deficiencies in China’s legal regime for protecting and enforcing copyrights and trademarks on a wide range of products, and 2) over China’s barriers to trade in books, music, videos and movies.

The WTO consultation request focuses on provisions of Chinese law that create a “safe harbor” for wholesalers and retailers who distribute or sell pirated and counterfeit products in China below a certain quantity. These safe harbors seem to allow sales of sufficient quantities of counterfeit goods that many large-scale wholesalers and distributors can operate below high thresholds without criminal liability, thus permitting large-scale piracy and counterfeiting. The U.S. also seeks that China destroy seized counterfeit goods, rather than allowing them to be sold into the marketplace after removal of their label. And that China protect foreign copyrights while such works are being reviewed by Chinese censors; and allow a greater importation of foreign media, such as movies.

A request for consultations is the first step in a WTO dispute. Under WTO rules, if the parties do not resolve a matter within a 60-day consultation period, then the complaining party may refer the matter to a WTO dispute settlement panel. Ultimately, this could trigger a trade war between the U.S. and China. See U.S. – China Trade Dispute

Damage to Brand Names

The U.S. Commerce Department estimates that, on average, twenty percent of all consumer products in the Chinese market are counterfeit. When counterfeit products fail, it can impact the real brand’s reputation as well. In China and around the world, counterfeit Chinese medicines have injured and killed hundreds of thousands, ranging from toothpaste and cold medicine in Panama to diet pills in Japan. Chinese authorities estimated that nearly 200,000 people were killed in China in 2001 due to counterfeit medicines. In a recent raid on a printing factory in the southern Chinese province of Guangdong, police seized bogus packaging and labels for Coca Cola bottles, Wrigley's chewing gum, General Mills'Trix breakfast cereal, and Nestle's Purina cat food. In order to prevent a scare similar to the Tylenol-tampering episode in the U.S. many years ago, foreign companies need shift into publicity overdrive to discredit and distinguish dangerous or shoddy counterfeit goods, lest their own products be tarred.

Similarly, counterfeit products impinge on the ability of Western companies to select and control their own distribution channels. Thus, even though Starbucks (SBUX) invested heavily in training its Chinese workers, it had to rush to court in 2003 to stop a copycat rival from misappropriating its logo and store look under the name “Xingbake” in 2003. "Xing" means "star" in Mandarin and "bake" sounds like "bucks" when pronounced in Chinese.

Effects Outside of China

The Motor and Equipment Manufacturer’s Association estimates that eighty percent of all counterfeit automobile parts imported into the U.S. originate in China or Hong Kong, costing the auto industry over $9 billion per year in lost sales. Likewise, hundreds of millions of dollars per year are lost to due to the export of China pirated DVDs and CDs each year; this figure may accelerate with the proliferation of new digital movie formats, including HD-DVD and Blu-Ray. U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) agents, working in conjunction with the Chinese government and private industry, conducted the first ever joint U.S.–Chinese enforcement action on the Chinese mainland and seized more than 210,000 counterfeit movie DVDs. Similarly, DHS agents recently stopped a combined Chinese and Middle-Eastern organization that was responsible for the smuggling and nationwide distribution of over 100 containers of counterfeit trademark merchandise, valued in excess of $400 million, that had already been smuggled into the U.S in less than a year..

Impact on Chinese Innovation and Future Export Potential

Chinese counterfeits are hurting the country’s own future export potential. A recent case of counterfeit ingredients poisoning medicines in Panama and Australia has put authorities there on guard against all Chinese imports of food and medicine. Similarly, dangerous fake dog food ingredients from China have made U.S. consumers wary of any foodstuffs coming from there. It is true.

Impact of Foreign Direct Investment

Foreign direct investment in China is limited by fears of counterfeiting. Many Western companies who possess proprietary technology are hesitant to move production, let alone research and development to China, for fear it will be copied. This means China is losing valuable opportunities to move its production to more sophisticated, higher value-add and higher margin products, as well as missing opportunities to train its workforce on more sophisticated product development techniques. As low-wage competitors like Vietnam develop their industrial output, China will be forced to compete solely on the basis of wages if it cannot improve its know-how and export product mix.

Future of China's Piracy & Counterfeiting problems and TRIPS laws

The Chinese have taken some steps to combat piracy and counterfeiting, although there remains much more to be done in actions vs. issuing statements. The recent creation of the State Intellectual Property Offices, is one small step.

China only joined the WTO in 2001, until recently the country was in a discretionary period which they have just gotten out of. This period gave them some leeway in terms of which of the organization's rules the country had to adhere to. Now that the probationary period has ended the country is trying to demonstrate an effort towards compliance. Universities are endeavoring towards IP law and there is some effort by the National Copyright Administration to close down unlawful websites and servers.

China has dramatically increased its patent filings producing over 200,000 patents in 2006. While some would say that this increase of patents gives them more reason to abide by international law, it remains to be seen whether this is proven.

Wikinvest © 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012. Use of this site is subject to express Terms of Service, Privacy Policy, and Disclaimer. By continuing past this page, you agree to abide by these terms. Any information provided by Wikinvest, including but not limited to company data, competitors, business analysis, market share, sales revenues and other operating metrics, earnings call analysis, conference call transcripts, industry information, or price targets should not be construed as research, trading tips or recommendations, or investment advice and is provided with no warrants as to its accuracy. Stock market data, including US and International equity symbols, stock quotes, share prices, earnings ratios, and other fundamental data is provided by data partners. Stock market quotes delayed at least 15 minutes for NASDAQ, 20 mins for NYSE and AMEX. Market data by Xignite. See data providers for more details. Company names, products, services and branding cited herein may be trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners. The use of trademarks or service marks of another is not a representation that the other is affiliated with, sponsors, is sponsored by, endorses, or is endorsed by Wikinvest.
Powered by MediaWiki