RECENT NEWS
New York Times  Dec 19  Comment 
President Obama said his decision to act unilaterally on immigration this year is a prime example of how he plans to keep using executive power even as he reaches out to Republicans to try and find agreement on a range of issues.
New York Times  Dec 19  Comment 
The Maricopa County sheriff, known for crackdowns on people living in the country illegally, is giving up his last major foothold in immigration enforcement efforts.
CNNMoney.com  Dec 18  Comment 
Read full story for latest details.
New York Times  Dec 17  Comment 
Mr. Bush, the former governor of Florida, could commandeer the center-right of the Republican Party, but his views on immigration and education may not please more conservative members.
New York Times  Dec 17  Comment 
Senators confirmed over Republican objections Sarah Saldaña as director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Antony Blinken to be deputy secretary of state.
New York Times  Dec 17  Comment 
A federal judge in Pennsylvania issued an opinion on Tuesday declaring unconstitutional President Obama’s executive actions on immigration, but the finding had no immediate effect.
New York Times  Dec 15  Comment 
The secretary of Homeland Security told a crowd in South Texas that a new facility, especially designed for women and children, should help deter illegal border crossings.
guardian.co.uk  Dec 15  Comment 
Rolling coverage of all the day’s political developments as they happen, including Ed Miliband’s immigration speech and David Cameron’s economy speech Lunchtime summary David Cameron’s economy speech - Summary and analysis 6.21pm...
Financial Times  Dec 15  Comment 
Labour plans new law against exploitation of migrant workers
MarketWatch  Dec 14  Comment 
The Senate on Saturday night passed and sent to President Barack Obama a $1.1 trillion government spending bill in a rare weekend session triggered by a conservative revolt against the measure over immigration.




 
TOP CONTRIBUTORS

A lot. More today than a year ago.Because of Obamacare, no company in America ofefrs stand alone children's health insurance.Why? Obamacare dictates that it is guaranteed issue, without rate ups, regardless of health. Therefore, there is no reason to purchase it until there is a claim needing to be paid.That's not health insurance. That's a confiscatory tax on health insurance companies. Fortunately, they aren't slaves yet, so they exercised the F U clause in the contract with the purple bellies from Washington and just refused to do business where they are guaranteed to lose money.How do you fix the problem of un- and under-insured? By making health insurance affordable.How do you make it affordable? By removing ALL government mandates, loser pays tort reform, encouraging competition between providers (enforce existing anti-trust laws), eliminate the AMA monopoly on billing codes, and eliminate the connection between employment and health insurance.Do these things and we'll see health insurance cost less than auto insurance. More people will be covered, more people will be healthy.

Wikinvest © 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012. Use of this site is subject to express Terms of Service, Privacy Policy, and Disclaimer. By continuing past this page, you agree to abide by these terms. Any information provided by Wikinvest, including but not limited to company data, competitors, business analysis, market share, sales revenues and other operating metrics, earnings call analysis, conference call transcripts, industry information, or price targets should not be construed as research, trading tips or recommendations, or investment advice and is provided with no warrants as to its accuracy. Stock market data, including US and International equity symbols, stock quotes, share prices, earnings ratios, and other fundamental data is provided by data partners. Stock market quotes delayed at least 15 minutes for NASDAQ, 20 mins for NYSE and AMEX. Market data by Xignite. See data providers for more details. Company names, products, services and branding cited herein may be trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners. The use of trademarks or service marks of another is not a representation that the other is affiliated with, sponsors, is sponsored by, endorses, or is endorsed by Wikinvest.
Powered by MediaWiki