|
|
 | | | |
- close
- close
- close
- close
Impact of Internet Advertising |
| Revision as of 10:21, November 7, 2009 (edit) 99.225.136.115 (Talk) (→Who Loses Out) ← Previous diff |
Revision as of 01:45, October 11, 2010 (edit) (undo) 212.219.19.2 (Talk) (→Emerging channels) Next diff → |
||
| Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
| ==Emerging channels== | ==Emerging channels== | ||
| Video games and mobile phones are two channels that may threaten or accelerate Internet advertising companies. [[Game Consoles Wars: Xbox 360 vs. PS3 vs. Wii|Console video games]] (i.e., PlayStation, Xbox, and Wii) are increasingly connected, and Internet-based games themselves (e.g., large online multiplayer games) have risen in popularity. In addition, [[Mobile Phone Adoption in Developing Countries|mobile phones are one of the most popular devices in the world]] and have increased in capabilities through technology such as [[3G]], which enables a wide range of activity such as email, Internet browsing, and multimedia capabilities. Advertising on these channels is a small but rapidly growing trend. Internet advertising companies such as [[MSFT|MSN]] and [[Yahoo!]] may benefit from these trends if they build capabilities to leverage these channels; otherwise, these emerging media may take share away from "traditional" Internet advertising as advertisers seek innovative ways to reach potential customers--for instance, mobile advertising has the benefit of being location-based and highly targetable. Internet video advertising is also growing in popularity and companies such as [[MODAVOX INC (MDVX)]] are assisting publishers of online videos in monetizing online videos. Whereas traditional TV advertising has relied on per-show and DMA targeting, internet video marketing can tailor advertising delivery on a per-user basis, according to the interests, viewing habits, demographics, time and / or location of every individual viewer. Internet video delivery also allows insertion parameters to be adjusted and optimized to maximize performance on the fly.<ref>[http://www.reelseo.com/video-advertising-2008/ Online Video Advertising Industry Report For Q4 2008]</ref> | Video games and mobile phones are two channels that may threaten or accelerate Internet advertising companies. [[Game Consoles Wars: Xbox 360 vs. PS3 vs. Wii|Console video games]] (i.e., PlayStation, Xbox, and Wii) are increasingly connected, and Internet-based games themselves (e.g., large online multiplayer games) have risen in popularity. In addition, [[Mobile Phone Adoption in Developing Countries|mobile phones are one of the most popular devices in the world]] and have increased in capabilities through technology such as [[3G]], which enables a wide range of activity such as email, Internet browsing, and multimedia capabilities. Advertising on these channels is a small but rapidly growing trend. Internet advertising companies such as [[MSFT|MSN]] and [[Yahoo!]] may benefit from these trends if they build capabilities to leverage these channels; otherwise, these emerging media may take share away from "traditional" Internet advertising as advertisers seek innovative ways to reach potential customers--for instance, mobile advertising has the benefit of being location-based and highly targetable. Internet video advertising is also growing in popularity and companies such as [[MODAVOX INC (MDVX)]] are assisting publishers of online videos in monetizing online videos. Whereas traditional TV advertising has relied on per-show and DMA targeting, internet video marketing can tailor advertising delivery on a per-user basis, according to the interests, viewing habits, demographics, time and / or location of every individual viewer. Internet video delivery also allows insertion parameters to be adjusted and optimized to maximize performance on the fly.<ref>[http://www.reelseo.com/video-advertising-2008/ Online Video Advertising Industry Report For Q4 2008]</ref> | ||
| + | I THINK THAT HAIRY BALLS TASTE LIKE GYPYS I LOVE MY CARAVAN | ||
| ==Channel Maturation== | ==Channel Maturation== | ||
Revision as of 01:45, October 11, 2010
|
Error creating thumbnail: convert: unable to open image `/home/wikinvest/src_live_1/mediawiki/images/9/9f/Global_thinking.svg.png': No such file or directory @ blob.c/OpenBlob/2480. convert: unable to open file `/home/wikinvest/src_live_1/mediawiki/images/9/9f/Global_thinking.svg.png' @ png.c/ReadPNGImage/2889. convert: missing an image filename `/home/wikinvest/src_live_1/mediawiki/images/thumb/9/9f/Global_thinking.svg.png/30px-Global_thinking.svg.png' @ convert.c/ConvertImageCommand/2800. |
This article describes a concept which could impact a variety of companies, countries or industries. To see what companies and articles reference this concept page, click here. |
The breadth of U.S. advertisers across virtually all industries means that growth of advertising spend is highly correlated with the GDP, a measure of the country's productivity. The story becomes different when disaggregating advertising spend by channel. While TV, direct mail and newspapers account for nearly three-fourths of all advertising spending combined, the Internet channel has grown the fastest since 2001, taking share away from most traditional channels. Internet advertising grew at an annual clip of 18% from 2001-2006 and only cable TV (10%) was close to a double digit growth rate. Other channels basically kept pace with GDP growth (about 3%), with newspapers (1%) and radio (2%) most negatively affected. Total US internet advertising was $21.2B in 2007, a 26% increase over 2006. Consumer related advertising made up 55% of revenue. However, in the first quarter of 2008, for the first time in three years, quarterly internet ad revenues failed to set a new record.[1]
Contents |
Efficiency and Effectiveness
Advertising on the Internet has the dual benefit of being generally more efficient and effective compared to other media channels. A standard advertising cost metric is CPM or Cost per Thousand Impressions. For example, a $1 CPM equates to a cost of $1 to reach 1,000 theoretical viewers or readers (theoretical because not everyone will read or look at an advertisement). Internet CPM rates in 2006 averaged $6, much less than most traditional media (see table below). Compounding this lower cost is the effectiveness of Internet advertising, which can be measured using a variety of tracking methods. An advertiser can tell, for example, who clicked on an Internet ad and even who bought a product or service during an internet session. Companies such as Google and Yahoo! have leveraged the measure-ability of the Internet to charge advertisers for clicks rather than impressions, further attracting advertisers with its pay-for-performance model. On the other hand, it is extremely difficult to measure how effectively television, newspaper, radio or magazine ads drive sales.
| Media Channel | 2006 |
|---|---|
| Internet | $6 |
| TV (Network, Cable) | $18 |
| Radio (Network, Spot) | $7 |
| Magazine | $11 |
| Newspaper | $26 |
Click Fraud
Click fraud involves a person or automated script that clicks on a Pay-per-click ad in order to generate a charge without actually having interest in the target ad. Pay-per-click (PPC) Internet ad companies face threats from click fraud, which artificially inflate the prices paid by advertisers and benefit the advertising companies such as Yahoo! and Google, which generate revenue from clicks. Both of these companies have settled several lawsuits claiming that the company did not do enough to stem click fraud. It is currently under debate how much of their PPC business is fraudulent.
Emerging channels
Video games and mobile phones are two channels that may threaten or accelerate Internet advertising companies. Console video games (i.e., PlayStation, Xbox, and Wii) are increasingly connected, and Internet-based games themselves (e.g., large online multiplayer games) have risen in popularity. In addition, mobile phones are one of the most popular devices in the world and have increased in capabilities through technology such as 3G, which enables a wide range of activity such as email, Internet browsing, and multimedia capabilities. Advertising on these channels is a small but rapidly growing trend. Internet advertising companies such as MSN and Yahoo! may benefit from these trends if they build capabilities to leverage these channels; otherwise, these emerging media may take share away from "traditional" Internet advertising as advertisers seek innovative ways to reach potential customers--for instance, mobile advertising has the benefit of being location-based and highly targetable. Internet video advertising is also growing in popularity and companies such as MODAVOX INC (MDVX) are assisting publishers of online videos in monetizing online videos. Whereas traditional TV advertising has relied on per-show and DMA targeting, internet video marketing can tailor advertising delivery on a per-user basis, according to the interests, viewing habits, demographics, time and / or location of every individual viewer. Internet video delivery also allows insertion parameters to be adjusted and optimized to maximize performance on the fly.[2]
I THINK THAT HAIRY BALLS TASTE LIKE GYPYS I LOVE MY CARAVAN
Channel Maturation
Internet penetration and total page views in the U.S. have slowed in recent months, potentially signaling channel maturation. Internet advertising depends heavily on online traffic and if these trends continue, advertising spend on this may not grow at the same rate as recently (18% per year from 2001-2006).
| Year | Revenue ($ million) | Y-o-Y Growth |
|---|---|---|
| 2007 | $21,206 | 26% |
| 2006 | $16,879 | 35% |
| 2005 | $12,542 | 30% |
| 2004 | $9,626 | 33% |
| 2003 | $7,267 | 21% |
Who Benefits from Internet Advertising
- Online ad companies such as Google, Yahoo! and Microsoft's MSN account for a large portion of all PPC advertising (mostly search). Google in particular dominates the field, growing at a faster rate than Internet advertising overall while maintaining its leading position in the industry.
- Media companies with less exposure to traditional advertising and a greater dependence on other revenues drivers such as subscription (e.g., cable TV, satellite radio, premium newspapers) may benefit relative to their peers.
- Time Warner derives a larger portion of business outside of advertising compared to other media conglomerates. Even within its advertising business, the company is more heavily exposed to the Internet (13% of revenue from traditional advertising, about half of which is digital).
- The Dow Jones company, publisher of the Wall Street Journal, is ahead of its newspaper peers in terms of penetration into Internet advertising and online subscription revenue across its various properties such ask WSJ.com
- Companies such as Cisco and Juniper provide infrastructure products and services for the Internet. If Internet traffic--and hence, advertising--grows, then these companies may benefit for the demand of higher bandwidth and faster connections (e.g., online videos)
- Advertising agencies focused on Internet advertising would benefit from the increase in agency services in this space. aQuantive, a leading online advertising agency, was purchased by Microsoft in May 2007 at nearly double their market price previous to the announcement.
- Technology platform developers such as MODAVOX INC (MDVX) allow organizations to create, manage, and monetize internet radio and video content.
Who Loses Out
- Traditional media companies such as Time Warner, Viacom, Walt Disney Company (DIS), News Corp, Cablevision Systems (CVC), Time Warner Cable, Hearst-Argyle Television (HTV) and CBS depend heavily on advertising in traditional channels. Some media companies, however, are more exposed than others and several have even focused on building up their own Internet property portfolio.
- CBS is particularly dependent on traditional advertising, which drives over 70% of their overall revenue.
- Newspaper companies such as the New York Times and Washington Post Company (WPO) have suffered losses in both print advertising and subscription revenue as readers increasingly seek news online. In addition, a large portion of their online advertising business depends on advertising companies such as Google, which provide the inventory of ads and advertisers for sites such as About.com and NYTimes.com (Google shares the revenue generated by such ads).
- Major advertising agency conglomerates such as Omnicom Group (OMC) and Interpublic Group of Companies (IPG) source a large portion of revenue from media buying. If Internet advertising continues to put pricing pressure on more expensive media channels (such as newspaper and TV), traditional agencies' revenues may be negatively affected.
- Paper companies who provide stock for newspapers, magazines, yellow pages, and direct mail may see business decline, as the Internet continues to take advertising away from print media. Several newspapers such as the Wall Street Journal have also moved to reduce the size of their physical newspaper.
| |||||||
