|
|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| |||||||||
This excerpt taken from the AKS DEF 14A filed Apr 17, 2008. Policy with Respect to Deductibility of Executive Compensation Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code generally places a $1,000,000 limit on the deductibility for federal income tax purposes of the annual compensation paid to a companys chief executive officer and each of its other four most highly compensated executive officers (excluding the Chief Financial Officer). However, qualified performance-based compensation is exempt from this deductibility limitation. Qualified performance-based compensation is compensation paid based solely upon the achievement of objective performance goals, the material terms of which are approved by the shareholders of the paying corporation. Historically, compensation attributable to the exercise of stock options and performance shares granted under the Stock Plan, as well as incentive awards paid under the Annual Incentive Plan and the Long Term Plan, have been deemed to be qualified performance-based compensation and thus excluded from the $1,000,000 deductibility limit imposed by Section 162(m). A recent revenue ruling (IRS Rev. Rul. 2008-13, dated February 21, 2008) by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has altered the historical definition of qualified performance-based compensation used by the IRS. The new IRS ruling has prospective application only and by its terms will not adversely affect the deductibility of the compensation of any of the NEOs for 2008 or for any prior year. The Committee is continuing to evaluate this ruling and its application by the IRS and will timely consider whether revisions to any of the Companys incentive plans or agreements are appropriate in light of the ruling. The Committee considers the anticipated tax treatment to the Company when determining executive compensation and routinely seeks to structure its executive compensation program in a way which preserves the deductibility of compensation payments and benefits. It should be noted, however, that there are many factors which are considered by the Committee in determining executive compensation and, similarly, there are many factors which may affect the deductibility of executive compensation. In order to maintain the flexibility to be able to compensate NEOs in a manner designed to promote varying corporate goals, the Committee has not adopted a strict policy that all executive compensation must be deductible under Section 162(m). This excerpt taken from the AKS DEF 14A filed Apr 16, 2007. Policy with Respect to Deductibility of Executive Compensation Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code generally places a $1,000,000 limit on the deductibility for federal income tax purposes of the annual compensation paid to a companys chief executive officer and each of its other four most highly compensated executive officers. However, qualified performance-based compensation is exempt from this deductibility limitation. Qualified performance-based compensation is compensation paid based solely upon the achievement of objective performance goals, the material terms of which are approved by the shareholders of the paying corporation. Compensation attributable to the exercise of stock options and performance shares granted under the Stock Plan, as well as incentive awards paid under the Annual Incentive Plan and the Long Term Plan, are qualified performance-based compensation and thus are excluded from the $1,000,000 deductibility limit imposed by Section 162(m). The Committee considers the anticipated tax treatment to the Company when determining executive compensation and routinely seeks to structure its executive compensation program in a way which preserves the deductibility of compensation payments and benefits. It should be noted, however, that there are many factors which are considered by the Committee in determining executive compensation and, similarly, there are many factors which may affect the deductibility of executive compensation. In order to maintain the flexibility to be able to compensate Executive Officers in a manner designed to promote varying corporate goals, the Committee has not adopted a strict policy that all executive compensation must be deductible under Section 162(m). With respect to the 2006 performance awards under the Annual Incentive Plan, the Committee made a decision (discussed above) in January 2007 to change the parameters for the performance factor used to determine the portion of the performance award attributable to quality. As a consequence, a portion of the Annual Incentive Plan performance award for 2006 paid to Mr. Wainscott does not constitute qualified performance-based compensation exempt from the deductibility limitation of Section 162(m). The financial impact on the Company resulting from the loss of such exemption as to that portion of his 2006 Annual Incentive Plan performance award is expected to be less than $70,000 in additional federal income tax payments for 2006, or less than one-tenth of a penny per share. This excerpt taken from the AKS DEF 14A filed Apr 17, 2006. Policy with Respect to Deductibility of Executive Compensation
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code (the Code) generally places a $1,000,000 limit on the deductibility for federal income tax purposes of the annual compensation paid to a companys chief executive officer and each of its other four most highly compensated executive officers. However, qualified performance-based compensation is exempt from this deductibility limitation. Qualified performance-based compensation is compensation paid based solely upon the achievement of objective performance goals, the material terms of which are approved by the stockholders of the paying corporation. Compensation attributable to the exercise of stock options and performance shares granted under the SIP, as well as incentive awards paid under the MIP and the LTPP, are qualified performance-based compensation and thus are excluded from the $1,000,000 deductibility limit imposed by Section 162(m) of the Code. The Committee considers the anticipated tax treatment to the Company when determining executive compensation and routinely seeks to structure its executive compensation program in a way which preserves the deductibility of compensation payments and benefits. It should be noted, however, that there are many factors which are considered by the Committee in determining executive compensation, and similarly, there are many factors which may affect the deductibility of executive compensation. In order to maintain the flexibility to be able to compensate executive officers in a manner designed to promote varying corporate goals, the Committee has not adopted a strict policy that all executive compensation must be deductible under Section 162(m) of the Code.
This excerpt taken from the AKS DEF 14A filed Apr 22, 2005. Policy with Respect to Deductibility of Executive Compensation
Section 162(m) of the Code generally places a $1,000,000 limit on the deductibility for federal income tax purposes of the annual compensation paid to a companys chief executive officer and each of its other four most highly compensated executive officers. However, qualified performance-based compensation is exempt from this deductibility limitation. Qualified performance-based compensation is compensation paid based solely upon the achievement of objective performance goals, the material terms of which are approved by the shareholders of the paying corporation. Compensation attributable to the exercise of options granted under the SIP, as well as incentive awards paid under the MIP and the LTPP, are qualified performance-based compensation and thus are excluded from the $1,000,000 deductibility limit imposed by Section 162(m). Also, as noted above, in order to qualify the Performance Shares as qualified performance-based compensation, the Company has amended and restated the SIP, and has submitted it for approval at the Companys 2005 annual meeting of shareholders. It further should be noted, however, that in order to maintain flexibility in compensating executive officers in a manner designed to promote varying corporate goals, the Committee has not adopted a policy that all executive compensation must be deductible.
| EXCERPTS ON THIS PAGE:
|
| |||||||