|
|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| |||||||||
Prologis, Inc. 10-K 2009 Table of Contents
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-K
Commission File Number
001-13545
Securities registered pursuant
to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file
reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has
filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K
(§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein,
and will not be contained, to the best of registrants
knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this
Form 10-K
or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer
or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and
smaller reporting company in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the
Act). Yes o No þ
The aggregate market value of common shares held by
non-affiliates of the registrant (based upon the closing sale
price on the New York Stock Exchange) on June 30, 2008 was
$4,725,199,359.
As of February 24, 2009, there were 98,420,207 shares
of the registrants common stock outstanding.
Part III incorporates by reference portions of the
registrants Proxy Statement for its Annual Meeting of
Stockholders which the registrant anticipates will be filed no
later than 120 days after the end of its fiscal year
pursuant to Regulation 14A.
TABLES OF
CONTENTS
Table of Contents
Some of the information included in this annual report on
Form 10-K
contains forward-looking statements, which are made pursuant to
the safe-harbor provisions of Section 21E of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 27A of the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended. Because these
forward-looking statements involve numerous risks and
uncertainties, there are important factors that could cause our
actual results to differ materially from those in the
forward-looking statements, and you should not rely on the
forward-looking statements as predictions of future events. The
events or circumstances reflected in the forward-looking
statements might not occur. You can identify forward-looking
statements by the use of forward-looking terminology such as
believes, expects, may,
will, should, seeks,
approximately, intends,
plans, forecasting, pro
forma, estimates or anticipates,
or the negative of these words and phrases, or similar words or
phrases. You can also identify forward-looking statements by
discussions of strategy, plans or intentions. Forward-looking
statements should not be read as guarantees of future
performance or results, and will not necessarily be accurate
indicators of whether, or the time at which, such performance or
results will be achieved. There is no assurance that the events
or circumstances reflected in forward-looking statements will
occur or be achieved. Forward-looking statements are necessarily
dependent on assumptions, data or methods that may be incorrect
or imprecise and we may not be able to realize them.
The following factors, among others, could cause actual
results and future events to differ materially from those set
forth or contemplated in the forward-looking statements:
Table of Contents
Our success also depends upon economic trends generally,
various market conditions and fluctuations and those other risk
factors discussed under the heading Risk Factors in
Item 1A of this report. We caution you not to place undue
reliance on forward-looking statements, which reflect our
analysis only and speak as of the date of this report or as of
the dates indicated in the statements. All of our
forward-looking statements, including those in this report, are
qualified in their entirety by this statement. We assume no
obligation to update or supplement forward-looking
statements.
Unless the context otherwise requires, the terms
AMB, the Company, we,
us and our refer to AMB Property
Corporation, AMB Property, L.P. and their other controlled
subsidiaries, and the references to AMB Property Corporation
include AMB Property, L.P. and their controlled subsidiaries. We
refer to AMB Property, L.P. as the operating
partnership. The following marks are our registered
trademarks:
AMB®;
and High Throughput
Distribution®
(HTD®).
Table of Contents
PART I
The
Company
AMB Property Corporation, a Maryland corporation, organized in
1997, owns, acquires, develops and operates industrial
properties in key distribution markets tied to global trade in
the Americas, Europe and Asia. We use the terms industrial
properties or industrial buildings to describe
various types of industrial properties in our portfolio and use
these terms interchangeably with the following: logistics
facilities, centers or warehouses; distribution facilities,
centers or warehouses; High Throughput
Distribution®
(HTD®)
facilities; or any combination of these terms. We use the term
owned and managed to describe assets in which we
have at least a 10% ownership interest, we are the property or
asset manager and we currently intend to hold for the long term.
We use the term joint venture to describe all joint
ventures, which include co-investment ventures, as well as
ventures with third parties. We earn asset management
distributions or fees, or earn incentive distributions or
promote interests from the joint ventures. In certain cases, we
might provide development, leasing, property management
and/or
accounting services, for which we may receive compensation. We
use the term co-investment venture to describe joint
ventures with institutional investors that are managed by us,
from which we receive acquisition fees for third-party
acquisitions, portfolio and asset management distributions or
fees, as well as incentive distributions or promote interests.
We operate our business primarily through our subsidiary, AMB
Property, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, which we refer
to as the operating partnership. As of
December 31, 2008, we owned an approximate 96.6% general
partnership interest in the operating partnership, excluding
preferred units. As the sole general partner of the operating
partnership, we have the full, exclusive and complete
responsibility for and discretion in its day-to-day management
and control.
We are a self-administered and self-managed real estate
investment trust and expect that we have qualified, and will
continue to qualify, as a real estate investment trust for
federal income tax purposes beginning with the year ended
December 31, 1997. As a self-administered and self-managed
real estate investment trust, our own employees perform our
corporate administrative and management functions, rather than
our relying on an outside manager for these services. We manage
our portfolio of properties generally through direct property
management performed by our own employees. Additionally, within
our flexible operating model, we may from time to time establish
relationships with third-party real estate management firms,
brokers and developers that provide some property-level
administrative and management services under our direction.
Our global headquarters are located at Pier 1, Bay 1,
San Francisco, California 94111; our telephone number is
(415) 394-9000.
Our other principal office locations are in Amsterdam, Boston,
Chicago, Los Angeles, Mexico City, Shanghai, Singapore and
Tokyo. As of December 31, 2008, we employed 645
individuals: 171 in our San Francisco headquarters, 46 in
our Boston office, 54 in our Tokyo office, 58 in our Amsterdam
office, 64 in our Mexico City office and the remainder in our
other offices.
Our strategy focuses on providing industrial distribution
warehouse space to customers whose businesses are tied to global
trade and who value the efficient movement of goods through the
global supply chain. Our properties are primarily located in the
worlds busiest distribution markets: large,
supply-constrained infill locations with dense populations and
proximity to airports, seaports and major highway systems. When
measured by annualized base rent, on an owned and managed basis,
a substantial majority of our portfolio of industrial properties
is located in our target markets and much of this is in infill
submarkets within our target markets. Infill locations are
characterized by supply constraints on the availability of land
for competing projects as well as physical, political or
economic barriers to new development.
In many of our target markets, we focus on
HTD®
facilities, which are buildings designed to facilitate the rapid
distribution of our customers products rather than the
storage of goods. Our investment focus on
HTD®
assets is based on what we believe to be a global trend toward
lower inventory levels and expedited supply chains.
HTD®
Table of Contents
facilities generally have a variety of physical characteristics
that allow for the rapid transport of goods from point-to-point.
These physical characteristics could include numerous dock
doors, shallower building depths, fewer columns, large truck
courts and more space for trailer parking. We believe that these
building characteristics help our customers to reduce their
costs and become more efficient in their delivery systems. Our
customers include air express, logistics and freight forwarding
companies that have time-sensitive needs, and that value
facilities located in convenient proximity to transportation
infrastructure, such as major airports and seaports.
As of December 31, 2008, we owned, or had investments in,
on a consolidated basis or through unconsolidated co-investment
ventures, properties and development projects expected to total
approximately 160.0 million square feet (14.9 million
square meters) in 49 markets within 15 countries. Additionally,
as of December 31, 2008, we managed, but did not have an
ownership interest in, industrial and other properties totaling
approximately 1.1 million rentable square feet.
Of the approximately 160.0 million square feet as of
December 31, 2008:
Operating
Strategy
We believe that real estate is fundamentally a local business
and is best operated by local teams in each of our markets. As a
vertically integrated company, we actively manage our portfolio
of properties. In select markets, we may, from time to time,
establish relationships with third-party real estate management
firms, brokers and developers that provide some property-level
administrative and management services under our direction. We
offer a broad array of service offerings, including access to
multiple locations worldwide and build-to-suit developments.
Long Term
Growth Strategies
We seek to generate long-term internal growth through rent
increases on existing space and renewals on rollover space,
striving to maintain a high occupancy rate at our properties and
to control expenses by capitalizing on the economies of scale
inherent in owning, operating and growing a large, global
portfolio. We actively manage our portfolio, whether directly or
with an alliance partner, by establishing leasing strategies and
negotiating lease terms, pricing, and level and timing of
property improvements. We believe that our long-standing focus
on customer relationships and ability to provide global
solutions in fifteen countries for a well-diversified customer
base in the shipping, air cargo and logistics industries will
enable us to capitalize on opportunities as they arise.
We believe that our properties benefit from cost efficiencies
produced by an experienced, cycle-tested operations team
attentive to preventive maintenance and energy management and
from our ongoing programs to ensure that our property management
personnel remain focused on customer relations. Our goal is to
be well-situated to attract new customers and achieve solid
rental rates as a result of properties that are well-located,
well-designed and well-maintained, a reputation for high-quality
building services and responsiveness to customers and an ability
to offer expansion, consolidation and relocation alternatives
within our submarkets.
Table of Contents
We think that the development, redevelopment and expansion of
well-located, high-quality industrial properties provide us with
attractive investment opportunities at higher rates of return
than may be obtained from the purchase of existing properties.
Through the deployment of our in-house development and
redevelopment expertise, we seek to create value both through
new construction and the acquisition and management of
redevelopment opportunities. Additionally, we believe that our
historical focus on infill locations creates a unique
opportunity to enhance value through the select conversion of
industrial properties to higher and better uses, within our
value-added conversion business. Value-added conversion projects
generally involve a significant enhancement or a change in use
of the property from industrial distribution warehouse to a
higher and better use, such as office, retail or residential.
New developments, redevelopments and value-added conversions
require significant management attention, and development and
redevelopment require significant capital investment, to
maximize their returns. Completed development and redevelopment
properties are generally contributed to our co-investment
ventures and held in our owned and managed portfolio or sold to
third parties. Value-added conversion properties are generally
sold to third parties at some point in the
re-entitlement/conversion process, thus recognizing the enhanced
value of the underlying land that supports the propertys
repurposed use. We think our global market presence and
expertise will enable us to generate and capitalize on a diverse
range of development opportunities in the long term. At this
time, however, while development, redevelopment and value added
conversions will continue to be a fundamental part of our long
term growth strategy, we will limit this activity to situations
where we are fulfilling prior commitments until the financial
and real estate markets stabilize.
Although we have reduced our development staff in correlation to
reduced levels of development activity, our core team possesses
multidisciplinary backgrounds, which positions us to complete
the build out of our development pipeline and for future
development or redevelopment opportunities when stability
returns to the financial and real estate markets. We believe our
development team has extensive experience in real estate
development, both with us and with local, national or
international development firms. We pursue development projects
directly and in co-investment ventures and development joint
ventures, providing us with the flexibility to pursue
development projects independently or in partnerships, depending
on market conditions, submarkets or building sites and
availability of capital.
Our acquisition experience and our network of property
management, leasing and acquisition resources should continue to
provide opportunities for growth. In addition to our internal
resources, we have long-term relationships with leasing and
investment sales brokers, as well as third-party local property
management firms, which may give us access to additional
acquisition opportunities because such managers frequently
market properties on behalf of sellers. In addition, we seek to
redeploy capital from non-strategic assets into properties that
better fit our current investment focus. See Part II,
Item 7: Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Summary of Key Transactions in 2008. At this time, while
acquisitions will continue to be a fundamental part of our long
term growth strategy, we will limit this activity to situations
where we are fulfilling prior commitments until the financial
and real estate markets stabilize.
We are generally engaged in various stages of negotiations for a
number of acquisitions and other transactions, some of which may
be significant, that may include, but are not limited to,
individual properties, large multi-property portfolios or
property owning or real estate-related entities. We cannot
assure you that we will consummate any of these transactions.
Such transactions, if we consummate them, may be material
individually or in the aggregate.
Growth
through Global Expansion
Our long-term capital allocation goal is to have approximately
50% of our owned and managed operating portfolio invested in
markets outside the United States based on annualized base rent.
Expansion into target markets outside the United States
represents a natural extension of our strategy to invest in
industrial property markets with high population densities,
proximity to large customer clusters and available labor pools,
and major distribution centers serving global trade. Our
international expansion strategy mirrors our focus in the United
States on supply-
Table of Contents
constrained submarkets with political, economic or physical
constraints to new development. Our international investments
extend our offering of
HTD®
facilities to customers who value speed-to-market over storage.
We think that our established customer relationships, our
contacts in the air cargo, shipping and logistics industries,
our underwriting of markets and investments, our in-house
expertise and our strategic alliances with knowledgeable
developers and managers will assist us in competing
internationally. For a discussion of the amount of our revenues
attributable to the United States and international markets,
please see Part IV, Item 15: Note 16 of the
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
We, through AMB Capital Partners, LLC, our private capital
group, were one of the pioneers of the real estate investment
trust (REIT) industrys co-investment private capital
investment model and have more than 25 years of experience
meeting institutional investors real estate needs. We
co-invest in properties with private capital investors through
partnerships, limited liability companies or other joint
ventures. We have a direct and long-standing relationship with
institutional investors. More than 60% of our owned and managed
operating portfolio is owned through our eight co-investment
ventures. We tailor industrial portfolios to investors
specific needs in separate or commingled
accounts deploying capital in both close-ended and
open-ended structures and providing complete portfolio
management and financial reporting services. Generally, we will
own a 10-50%
interest in our co-investment ventures. Our co-investment
ventures typically allow us to earn acquisition and development
fees, asset management fees or priority distributions, as well
as promote interests or incentive distributions based on the
performance of the co-investment ventures. As of
December 31, 2008, we owned approximately 78.7 million
square feet of our properties (49.2% of the total operating and
development portfolio) through our consolidated and
unconsolidated co-investment ventures.
New
York Stock Exchange Certification
We submitted our 2008 annual Section 12(a) Chief Executive
Officer certification with the New York Stock Exchange. The
certification was not qualified in any respect. Additionally, we
filed with the SEC as exhibits to this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008, the Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer certifications required
under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and
furnished as exhibits to this Annual Report the Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer certifications required
under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Our website address is
http://www.amb.com.
Our annual reports on
Form 10-K,
quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q,
current reports on
Form 8-K
and any amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant
to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 are available on our website free of charge as soon as
reasonably practicable after we electronically file such
material with, or furnish it to, the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission, or SEC. The public may read and copy these
materials at the SECs Public Reference Room at
100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. The public may
obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room
by calling the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330.
The SEC maintains a website that contains such reports, proxy
and information statements and other information, and the
Internet address is
http://www.sec.gov.
Our Corporate Governance Principles and Code of Business Conduct
are also posted on our website. Information contained on our
website is not and should not be deemed a part of this report or
any other report or filing filed with or furnished to the SEC.
Table of Contents
Our operations involve various risks that could have adverse
consequences to us. These risks include, among others:
Risks of
the Current Economic Environment
If the
global market and economic crisis intensifies or continues in
the long term, disruptions in the capital and credit markets may
adversely affect our business, results of operations, cash flows
and financial condition.
Recent global market and economic conditions have been
unprecedented and challenging with tighter credit conditions,
slower growth through the fourth quarter of 2008 and recession
in most major economies continuing into 2009. Continued concerns
about the systemic impact of inflation, the availability and
cost of credit, declining real estate market, energy costs and
geopolitical issues have contributed to increased market
volatility and diminished expectations for the global economy.
In the fourth quarter of 2008, added concerns fueled by the
failure of several large financial institutions and government
interventions in the credit markets led to increased market
uncertainty and instability in the capital and credit markets.
These conditions, combined with declining business activity
levels and consumer confidence, increased unemployment and
volatile oil prices, have contributed to unprecedented levels of
volatility in the capital markets. If the global market and
economic crisis intensifies or continues in the long term,
disruptions in the capital and credit markets may adversely
affect our business, results of operations, cash flows and
financial condition.
As a result of these market conditions, the cost and
availability of credit have been and may continue to be
adversely affected by illiquid credit markets and wider credit
spreads. Concern about the stability of the markets generally
and the strength of counterparties specifically has led many
lenders and institutional investors to reduce, and in some
cases, cease to provide funding to businesses and consumers.
These factors have led to a decrease in spending by businesses
and consumers alike, and a corresponding decrease in global
infrastructure spending. While we currently believe that we have
sufficient working capital and capacity under our credit
facilities in the near term, continued turbulence in the global
markets and economies and prolonged declines in business and
consumer spending may adversely affect our liquidity and
financial condition, as well as the liquidity and financial
condition of our customers. If these market conditions persist
in the long term, they may limit our ability, and the ability of
our customers, to timely replace maturing liabilities, and
access the credit markets to meet liquidity needs.
If the long-term debt ratings of the operating partnership fall
below our current levels, the borrowing cost of debt under our
unsecured credit facilities and certain term loans may increase.
In addition, if the long-term debt ratings of the operating
partnership fall below investment grade, we may be unable to
request borrowings in currencies other than U.S. dollars or
Japanese Yen, as applicable; however, the lack of other currency
borrowings does not affect our ability to fully draw down under
the credit facilities or term loans. While we currently do not
expect our long-term debt ratings to fall below investment
grade, in the event that our ratings do fall below those levels,
we may be unable to exercise our options to extend the term of
our credit facilities or our $230 million secured term loan
credit agreement, and the loss of our ability to borrow in
foreign currencies could affect our ability to optimally hedge
our borrowings against foreign currency exchange rate changes.
In addition, while based on publicly available information
regarding our lenders, we currently do not expect to lose
borrowing capacity under our existing lines of credit and term
loans as a result of a dissolution, bankruptcy, consolidation,
merger or other business combination among our lenders, we
cannot assure you that continuing long-term disruptions in the
global economy and the continuation of tighter credit conditions
among, and potential failures of, third-party financial
institutions as a result of such disruptions will not have an
adverse effect on our borrowing capacity and liquidity position.
Our access to funds under our credit facilities is dependent on
the ability of the lenders that are parties to such facilities
to meet their funding commitments to us. We can not assure you
that if one of our lenders fails (some of whom are lenders under
a number of our facilities), we will be successful in finding a
replacement lender and, as a result, our borrowing capacity
under the applicable facilities may be permanently reduced. If
we do not have sufficient cash flows and income from our
operations to meet our financial commitments and those lenders
Table of Contents
are not able to meet their funding commitments to us, our
business, results of operations, cash flows and financial
condition could be adversely affected.
Certain of our third-party indebtedness is held by our
consolidated or unconsolidated joint ventures. In the event that
our joint venture partner is unable to meet its obligations
under our joint venture agreements or the third-party debt
agreements, we may elect to pay our joint venture partners
portion of debt to avoid foreclosure on the mortgaged property
or permit the lender to foreclose on the mortgaged property to
meet the joint ventures debt obligations. In either case,
we could face a loss of income and asset value on the property.
Until the financial and real estate markets stabilize, we have
limited our capital deployment activities to situations where we
are fulfilling prior commitments. There can be no assurance that
the markets will stabilize in the near future or that we will
choose to or be able to increase our levels of capital
deployment at such time or ever. In addition, a continued
increase in the cost of credit and inability to access the
capital and credit markets may adversely impact the occupancy of
our properties, the disposition of our properties, private
capital raising and contribution of properties to our
co-investment ventures. For example, an inability to fully lease
our properties may result in such properties not meeting our
investment criteria for contributions to our co-investment
ventures. If we are unable to contribute completed development
properties to our co-investment ventures or sell our completed
development projects to third parties, we will not be able to
recognize gains from the contribution or sale of such properties
and, as a result, our net income available to our common
stockholders and our funds from operations will decrease.
Additionally, business layoffs, downsizing, industry slowdowns
and other similar factors that affect our customers may
adversely impact our business and financial condition.
Furthermore, general uncertainty in the real estate markets has
resulted in conditions where the pricing of certain real estate
assets may be difficult due to uncertainty with respect to
capitalization rates and valuations, among other things, which
may add to the difficulty of buyers or our co-investment
ventures to obtain financing on favorable terms to acquire such
properties or cause potential buyers to not complete
acquisitions of such properties. The market uncertainty with
respect to capitalization rates and real estate valuations also
adversely impacts our net asset value. In addition, we may face
difficulty in refinancing our mortgage debt, or may be unable to
refinance such debt at all, if our property values significantly
decline. Such a decline may also cause a default under the
loan-to-value covenants in some of our joint ventures
mortgage debt, which may require our joint ventures to re-margin
or pay down a portion of the applicable debt. There can be no
assurance, however, that in such an event, we will be able to do
so to prevent foreclosure.
In the event that we do not have sufficient cash available to us
through our operations to continue operating our business as
usual, we may need to find alternative ways to increase our
liquidity. Such alternatives may include, without limitation,
divesting ourselves of properties, whether or not they otherwise
meet our strategic objectives to keep in the long term, at less
than optimal terms; issuing and selling our debt and equity in
public or private transactions under less than optimal
conditions; entering into leases with our customers at lower
rental rates or less than optimal terms; or entering into lease
renewals with our existing customers without an increase in
rental rates at turnover. There can be no assurance, however,
that such alternative ways to increase our liquidity will be
available to us. Additionally, taking such measures to increase
our liquidity may adversely affect our business, results of
operations and financial condition.
As of December 31, 2008, we had $223.9 million in cash
and cash equivalents. Our available cash and cash equivalents
are held in accounts managed by third-party financial
institutions and consist of invested cash and cash in our
operating accounts. The invested cash is invested in money
market funds that invest solely in direct obligations of the
government of the United States or in time deposits with certain
financial institutions. To date, we have experienced no loss or
lack of access to our invested cash or cash equivalents;
however, we can provide no assurances that access to our
invested cash and cash equivalents will not be impacted by
adverse conditions in the financial markets.
At any point in time, we also have a significant amount of cash
deposits in our operating accounts that are with third-party
financial institutions, and, as of December 31, 2008, the
amount in such deposits was approximately $176.6 million on
a consolidated basis. These balances exceed the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation insurance limits. While we monitor daily
the cash balances in our operating accounts and adjust the cash
balances as appropriate, these cash balances could be impacted
if the underlying financial institutions fail or be subject to
other
Table of Contents
adverse conditions in the financial markets. To date, we have
experienced no loss or lack of access to cash in our operating
accounts.
The
price per share of our stock may decline or fluctuate
significantly.
The market price per share of our common stock may decline or
fluctuate significantly in response to many factors, including:
Many of the factors listed above are beyond our control. These
factors may cause the market price of shares of our common stock
to decline, regardless of our financial condition, results of
operations, business or our prospects.
Debt
Financing Risks
We
face risks associated with the use of debt to fund our business
activities, including refinancing and interest rate
risks.
As of December 31, 2008, we had total debt outstanding of
$4.0 billion. As of December 31, 2008, we guaranteed
$1.2 billion of the operating partnerships
obligations with respect to the senior debt securities
referenced in our financial statements. We are subject to risks
normally associated with debt financing, including the risk that
our cash flow will be insufficient to meet required payments of
principal and interest. We anticipate that we will repay only a
small portion of the principal of our debt prior to maturity.
Accordingly, we will likely need to refinance at least a portion
of our outstanding debt as it matures. There is a risk that we
may not be able to refinance existing debt or that the terms of
any refinancing will not be as favorable as the terms of our
existing debt. If we are unable to refinance or extend principal
payments due at maturity or pay them with proceeds of other
capital
Table of Contents
transactions, then we expect that our cash flow will not be
sufficient in all years to repay all such maturing debt and to
pay cash dividends to our stockholders. Furthermore, if
prevailing interest rates or other factors at the time of
refinancing (such as the reluctance of lenders to make
commercial real estate loans) result in higher interest rates
upon refinancing, then the interest expense relating to that
refinanced indebtedness would increase. Higher interest rates on
newly incurred debt may negatively impact us as well. If
interest rates increase, our interest costs and overall costs of
capital will increase, which could adversely affect our
financial condition, results of operation and cash flow, the
market price of our stock, our ability to pay principal and
interest on our debt, our ability to pay cash dividends to our
stockholders and our capital deployment activity. In addition,
there may be circumstances that will require us to obtain
amendments or waivers to provisions in our credit facilities or
other financings. There can be no assurance that we will be able
to obtain necessary amendments or waivers at all or without
significant expense. In such case, we may not be able to fund
our business activities as planned, within budget or at all.
In addition, if we mortgage one or more of our properties to
secure payment of indebtedness and we are unable to meet
mortgage payments, then the property could be foreclosed upon or
transferred to the lender with a consequent loss of income and
asset value. A foreclosure on one or more of our properties
could adversely affect our financial condition, results of
operations, cash flow and ability to pay cash dividends to our
stockholders, and the market price of our stock.
As of December 31, 2008, we had outstanding bank guarantees
in the amount of $27.8 million used to secure contingent
obligations, primarily obligations under development and
purchase agreements, including $0.7 million guaranteed
under a purchase agreement entered into by an unconsolidated
joint venture. As of December 31, 2008, we also guaranteed
$49.6 million and $231.8 million on outstanding loans
for six of our consolidated co-investment ventures and four of
our unconsolidated co-investment ventures, respectively, as well
as the following credit facility held by AMB Europe Fund I,
FCP-FIS, one of our unconsolidated co-investment ventures. In
December 2008, we agreed to guarantee 50.2 million Euros
(approximately $70.1 million in U.S. dollars using the
exchange rate as of December 31, 2008) that our
European affiliate borrowers
and/or their
affiliates borrowed under an existing credit facility held by
AMB Europe Fund I, FCP-FIS. The European affiliate
borrowers are in the process of granting security interests to
the lender, as the security agent, under and in accordance with
the terms of such facility, all of which security interests are
expected to become effective in the first half of 2009. We
agreed to guarantee the 50.2 million Euro amount borrowed
under such existing credit facility only until the security
interests are granted, at which time the guarantees will be
extinguished. Also, we have entered into contribution agreements
with certain of our unconsolidated co-investment venture funds.
These contribution agreements require us to make additional
capital contributions to the applicable co-investment venture
fund upon certain defaults by the co-investment venture of its
debt obligations to the lenders. Such additional capital
contributions will cover all or part of the applicable
co-investment ventures debt obligation and may be greater
than our share of the co-investment ventures debt
obligation or the value of our share of any property securing
such debt. Our contribution obligations under these agreements
will be reduced by the amounts recovered by the lender and the
fair market value of the property, if any, used to secure the
debt and obtained by the lender upon default. Our potential
obligations under these contribution agreements were
$260.6 million as of December 31, 2008. We intend to
continue to guarantee debt of our unconsolidated co-investment
venture funds and make additional contributions to our
unconsolidated co-investment venture funds in connection with
property contributions to the funds. Such payment obligations
under such guarantees and contribution obligations under such
contribution agreements, if required to be paid, could be of a
magnitude that could adversely affect our financial condition,
results of operations, cash flow and ability to pay cash
dividends to our stockholders and the market price of our stock.
The credit ratings of our senior unsecured long-term debt and
preferred stock are based on our operating performance,
liquidity and leverage ratios, overall financial position and
other factors employed by the credit rating agencies in their
rating analyses of us. Our credit ratings can affect the amount
of capital we can access, as well as the terms and pricing of
any debt we may incur. There can be no assurance that we will be
able to maintain our current credit ratings, and in the event
our current credit ratings are downgraded, we would likely incur
higher borrowing costs and may encounter difficulty in obtaining
additional financing. Also, a downgrade in our credit ratings
may trigger additional payments or other negative consequences
under our current and future credit facilities
Table of Contents
and debt instruments. For example, if our credit ratings of our
senior unsecured long-term debt are downgraded to below
investment grade levels, we may not be able to obtain or
maintain extensions on certain of our existing debt. Adverse
changes in our credit ratings could negatively impact our
refinancing activities, our ability to manage our debt
maturities, our future growth, our financial condition, the
market price of our stock, and our development and acquisition
activity.
Covenants
in our debt agreements could adversely affect our financial
condition.
The terms of our credit agreements and other indebtedness
require that we comply with a number of financial and other
covenants, such as maintaining debt service coverage and
leverage ratios and maintaining insurance coverage. These
covenants may limit flexibility in our operations, and our
failure to comply with these covenants could cause a default
under the applicable debt agreement even if we have satisfied
our payment obligations. As of December 31, 2008, we had
certain non-recourse, secured loans, which are
cross-collateralized by multiple properties. If we default on
any of these loans, we may then be required to repay such
indebtedness, together with applicable prepayment charges, to
avoid foreclosure on all the cross-collateralized properties
within the applicable pool. Foreclosure on our properties, or
our inability to refinance our loans on favorable terms, could
adversely impact our financial condition, results of operations,
cash flow and ability to pay cash dividends to our stockholders
and the market price of our stock. In addition, our credit
facilities and senior debt securities contain certain
cross-default provisions, which are triggered in the event that
our other material indebtedness is in default. These
cross-default provisions may require us to repay or restructure
the credit facilities and the senior debt securities in addition
to any mortgage or other debt that is in default, which could
adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations,
cash flow and ability to pay cash dividends to our stockholders
and the market price of our stock.
We seek to manage our exposure to exchange and interest rate
volatility by using exchange and interest rate hedging
arrangements, such as cap agreements and swap agreements. These
agreements involve risks, such as the risk that the
counterparties may fail to honor their obligations under these
arrangements, that these arrangements may not be effective in
reducing our exposure to exchange or interest rate changes and
that a court could rule that such agreements are not legally
enforceable. Hedging may reduce overall returns on our
investments. Failure to hedge effectively against exchange and
interest rate changes may materially adversely affect our
results of operations.
In order to qualify as a real estate investment trust, we are
required each year to distribute to our stockholders at least
90% of our real estate investment trust taxable income
(determined without regard to the dividends-paid deduction and
by excluding any net capital gain) and are subject to tax to the
extent our income is not fully distributed. While historically
we have satisfied these distribution requirements by making cash
distributions to our stockholders, we may choose to satisfy
these requirements by making distributions of cash or other
property, including, in limited circumstances, our own stock.
For distributions with respect to taxable years ending on or
before December 31, 2009, recent Internal Revenue Service
guidance allows us to satisfy up to 90% of the distribution
requirements discussed above through the distribution of shares
of our stock, if certain conditions are met. Assuming we
continue to satisfy these distribution requirements with cash,
we may not be able to fund all future capital needs, including
acquisition and development activities, from cash retained from
operations and may have to rely on third-party sources of
capital. Further, in order to maintain our real estate
investment trust status and avoid the payment of federal income
and excise taxes, we may need to borrow funds on a short-term
basis to meet the real estate investment trust distribution
requirements even if the then-prevailing market conditions are
not favorable for these borrowings. These short-term borrowing
needs could result from differences in timing between the actual
receipt of cash and inclusion of income for federal income tax
purposes, or the effect of non-deductible capital expenditures,
the creation of reserves or required debt or amortization
payments. Our ability to access private debt and equity capital
on favorable terms or at all is dependent upon a number of
factors, including general
Table of Contents
market conditions, the markets perception of our growth
potential, our current and potential future earnings and cash
distributions and the market price of our securities.
We
could incur more debt, increasing our debt
service.
As of December 31, 2008, our share of total debt-to-our
share of total market capitalization ratio was 61.4%. Our
definition of our share of total market
capitalization is our share of total debt plus preferred
equity liquidation preferences plus market equity. See footnote
1 to the Capitalization Ratios table contained in Part II,
Item 7: Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operation
Liquidity and Capital Resources for our definitions of
market equity and our share of total
debt. As this ratio percentage increases directly with a
decrease in the market price per share of our capital stock, an
unstable market environment will impact this ratio in a volatile
manner. However, there can be no assurance that we would not
also become more highly leveraged, resulting in an increase in
debt service that could adversely affect the cash available for
distribution to our stockholders. Furthermore, if we become more
highly leveraged, we may not be in compliance with the debt
covenants contained in the agreements governing our
co-investment ventures, which could adversely impact our private
capital business.
Other
Real Estate Industry Risks
The investment returns available from equity investments in real
estate depend on the amount of income earned and capital
appreciation generated by the properties, as well as the
expenses incurred in connection with the properties. If our
properties do not generate income sufficient to meet operating
expenses, including debt service and capital expenditures, then
our ability to pay cash dividends to our stockholders could be
adversely affected. In addition, there are significant
expenditures associated with an investment in real estate (such
as mortgage payments, real estate taxes and maintenance costs)
that generally do not decline when circumstances reduce the
income from the property. Income from, and the value of, our
properties may be adversely affected by:
In addition, periods of economic slowdown or recession in the
United States and in other countries, rising interest rates,
diminished access to or availability of capital or declining
demand for real estate, may result in a general decrease in
rents, an increased occurrence of defaults under existing leases
or greater difficulty in financing our acquisition and
development activities, which would adversely affect our
financial condition and results of operations. Future terrorist
attacks may result in declining economic activity, which could
reduce the demand for and the value of our properties. To the
extent that future attacks impact our customers, their
businesses similarly could be adversely affected, including
their ability to continue to honor their existing leases.
Table of Contents
Our properties are concentrated predominantly in the industrial
real estate sector. As a result of this concentration, we feel
the impact of an economic downturn in this sector more acutely
than if our portfolio included other property types.
The current economic downturn has generally resulted in lower
real estate valuations, which has required us to recognize real
estate impairment charges on our assets. In the quarter ended
December 31, 2008, we recognized non-cash impairment
charges of approximately $207.2 million on an owned and
managed basis including $195.4 million of real estate
impairment losses ($193.9 million on a consolidated basis)
and $11.8 million of charges for the write-off of pursuit
costs related to development projects that we no longer plan to
commence and reserves against tax assets associated with the
reduction in development activity. To the extent that the book
value of a land parcel or development asset exceeded the fair
market value of the property, based on its intended holding
period, a non-cash impairment charge was recognized for the
shortfall. We examined the estimated fair value of all of our
assets under development and assets held for sale or
contribution. The estimated fair value of each of these assets
was calculated based upon our intent to sell or contribute these
properties, assumptions regarding rental rates, costs to
complete,
lease-up and
holding periods and sales prices or contribution values. To
determine the fair market value for our land holdings, we
considered our intent to sell or to develop the parcels and, in
the case of the latter, assumptions regarding rental rates,
costs to complete,
lease-up and
holding periods and sales prices or contribution values are
taken into account. There can be no assurance that the estimates
and assumptions we use to assess impairments are accurate and
will reflect actual results. Further deterioration in real
estate market conditions may lead to additional impairment
charges in the future, possibly against other assets we hold or
of a greater magnitude than we have currently recognized. A
worsening real estate market may cause us to reevaluate the
assumptions used in our impairment analysis and our intent to
hold, sell, develop or contribute properties. Impairment charges
could adversely affect our financial condition, results of
operations and our ability to pay cash dividends to our
stockholders and the market price of our stock. See Part IV,
Item 15: Note 3 of the Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements for a more detailed discussion of the
real estate impairment losses recorded in our results of
operations during the fourth quarter of 2008.
We may
be unable to renew leases or relet space as leases
expire.
As of December 31, 2008, on an owned and managed basis,
leases on a total of 16.8% of our industrial properties (based
on annualized base rent) will expire on or prior to
December 31, 2009. We derive most of our income from rent
received from our customers. Accordingly, our financial
condition, results of operations, cash flow and our ability to
pay dividends on, and the market price of, our stock could be
adversely affected if we are unable to promptly relet or renew
these expiring leases or if the rental rates upon renewal or
reletting are significantly lower than expected. Periods of
economic slowdown or recession are likely to adversely affect
our leasing activities. If a customer experiences a downturn in
its business or other type of financial distress, then it may be
unable to make timely rental payments or renew its lease.
Further, our ability to rent space and the rents that we can
charge are impacted, not only by customer demand, but by the
number of other properties we have to compete with to appeal to
customers.
Our results of operations, distributable cash flow and the value
of our stock would be adversely affected if a significant number
of our customers were unable to meet their lease obligations to
us. In the current economic environment, it is likely that
customer bankruptcies will increase. If a customer seeks the
protection of bankruptcy, insolvency or similar laws, such
customers lease may be terminated in the process and
result in a reduction of cash flow to us. In the event of a
significant number of lease defaults
and/or
tenant bankruptcies, our cash flow may not be sufficient to pay
cash dividends to our stockholders and repay maturing debt and
any other obligations. As of December 31, 2008, on an owned
and managed basis, we did not have any single customer account
for annualized
Table of Contents
base rent revenues greater than 4.1%. However, in the event of
lease defaults by a significant number of our customers, we may
incur substantial costs in enforcing our rights as landlord.
We intend to continue to divest ourselves of properties, which
are currently in our pipeline, are held for sale or which
otherwise do not meet our strategic objectives, and we may, in
certain circumstances, divest ourselves of properties to
increase our liquidity or to capitalize on opportunities that
arise. Our ability to dispose of properties on advantageous
terms or at all depends on factors beyond our control, including
competition from other sellers, current market conditions
(including capitalization rates applicable to our properties)
and the availability of financing for potential buyers of our
properties. If we are unable to dispose of properties at all or
on favorable terms or redeploy the proceeds of property
divestitures in accordance with our investment strategy, then
our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow,
ability to meet our debt obligations in a timely manner and
ability to pay cash dividends to our stockholders and the market
price of our stock could be adversely affected.
We compete with other owners, operators and developers of real
estate, some of which own properties similar to ours in the same
submarkets in which our properties are located. If our
competitors sell assets similar to assets we intend to divest in
the same markets
and/or at
valuations below our valuations for comparable assets, we may be
unable to divest our assets at all or at favorable pricing or on
favorable terms. In addition, if our competitors offer space at
rental rates below current market rates or below the rental
rates we currently charge our customers, we may lose potential
customers, and we may be pressured to reduce our rental rates
below those we currently charge in order to retain customers
when our customers leases expire. As a result, our
financial condition, cash flow, cash available for distribution,
trading price of our common stock and ability to satisfy our
debt service obligations could be materially adversely affected.
Although we are curtailing our capital deployment activities
until the financial and real estate markets stabilize, we may
contribute or sell properties to our co-investment ventures on a
case-by-case
basis. However, we may fail to contribute properties to our
co-investment ventures due to such factors as our inability to
acquire, develop, or lease properties that meet the investment
criteria of such ventures, or our co-investment ventures
inability to access debt and equity capital to pay for property
contributions or their allocation of available capital to cover
other capital requirements such as forward commitments, loan
maturities and future redemptions. If the co-investment ventures
are unable to raise additional capital on favorable terms after
currently available capital is depleted or if the value of such
properties are appraised at less than the cost of such
properties, then such contributions or sales could be delayed or
prevented, adversely affecting our financial condition, results
of operations, cash flow and ability to pay cash dividends to
our stockholders, and the market price of our stock. For
example, although we have acquired land for development and made
capital commitments, we cannot be assured that we ultimately
will be able to contribute such properties to our co-investment
ventures as we have planned.
A delay in these contributions could result in adverse effects
on our liquidity and on our ability to meet projected earnings
levels in a particular reporting period. Failure to meet our
projected earnings levels in a particular reporting period could
have an adverse effect on our results of operations,
distributable cash flow and the value of our securities.
We are
subject to risks and liabilities in connection with properties
owned through co-investment ventures, limited liability
companies, partnerships and other investments.
As of December 31, 2008, approximately 89.9 million
square feet of our properties were held through several joint
ventures, limited liability companies or partnerships with third
parties. Our organizational documents do not limit the amount of
available funds that we may invest in partnerships, limited
liability companies or co-investment ventures, and we may
continue to develop and acquire properties through co-investment
ventures, limited liability
Table of Contents
companies, partnerships with and investments in other entities
when warranted by the circumstances. Such partners may share
certain approval rights over major decisions and some partners
may manage the properties in the joint venture partnership,
limited liability company or joint venture investments.
Partnership, limited liability company or co-investment venture
investments involve certain risks, including:
We generally seek to maintain sufficient control or influence
over our partnerships, limited liability companies and joint
ventures to permit us to achieve our business objectives,
however, we may not be able to do so, and the occurrence of one
or more of the events described above could adversely affect our
financial condition, results of operations, cash flow and
ability to pay cash dividends to our stockholders and the market
price of our stock.
On a strategic and selective basis, we may develop, renovate and
redevelop properties. In the long term after the credit markets
stabilize, we may expand and increase our investment in our
development, renovation and redevelopment business. The real
estate development, renovation and redevelopment business
involves significant risks that could adversely affect our
financial condition, results of operations, cash flow and
ability to pay cash dividends to our stockholders and the market
price of our stock, which include the following risks:
Table of Contents
We may
be unable to consummate acquisitions at all or on advantageous
terms or acquisitions may not perform as we
expect.
On a strategic and selective basis, we may continue to acquire
properties, primarily industrial in nature. The acquisition of
properties entails various risks, including the risks that our
investments may not perform or grow in value as we expect, that
we may be unable to quickly and efficiently integrate our new
acquisitions into our existing operations or, if applicable,
contribute the acquired properties to a joint venture, and that
our cost estimates for bringing an acquired property up to
market standards may prove inaccurate. In addition, we expect to
finance future acquisitions through a combination of borrowings
under our unsecured credit facilities, proceeds from equity or
debt offerings by us or the operating partnership or our
subsidiaries and proceeds from property divestitures, which may
not be available and which could adversely affect our cash flow.
Further, we face significant competition for attractive
investment opportunities from other real estate investors,
including both publicly-traded real estate investment trusts and
private institutional investors and funds. This competition
increases as investments in real estate become increasingly
attractive relative to other forms of investment. As a result of
competition, we may be unable to acquire additional properties
as we desire or the purchase price may be significantly
elevated. Any of the above risks could adversely affect our
financial condition, results of operations, cash flow and the
ability to pay cash dividends to our stockholders, and the
market price of our stock.
Real estate assets are not as liquid as certain other types of
assets. Further, the Internal Revenue Code regulates the number
of properties that we, as a real estate investment trust, can
dispose of in a year, their tax bases and the cost of
improvements that we make to the properties. In addition, a
portion of the properties held directly or indirectly by certain
of our subsidiary partnerships were acquired in exchange for
limited partnership units in the applicable partnership. The
contribution agreements for such properties may contain
restrictions on certain sales, exchanges or other dispositions
of these properties, or a portion thereof, that result in a
taxable transaction for specified periods, following the
contribution of these properties to the applicable partnership.
These limitations may affect our ability to sell properties.
This lack of liquidity and the Internal Revenue Code
restrictions may limit our ability to vary our portfolio
promptly in response to changes in economic or other conditions
and, as a result, could adversely affect our financial
condition, results of operations and cash flow, the market price
of our stock, the ability to pay cash dividends to our
stockholders, and our ability to access capital necessary to
meet our debt payments and other obligations.
Table of Contents
We have acquired and developed, and may continue to acquire and
develop on a strategic and selective basis, properties outside
the United States. Because local markets affect our operations,
our international investments are subject to economic
fluctuations in the international locations in which we invest.
Access to capital may be more restricted, or unavailable
entirely or on favorable terms, in certain locations. In
addition, our international operations are subject to the usual
risks of doing business abroad such as revisions in tax treaties
or other laws and regulations, including those governing the
taxation of our international revenues, restrictions on the
transfer of funds, and, in certain parts of the world,
uncertainty over property rights and political instability. We
cannot predict the likelihood that any of these developments may
occur. Further, we have entered, and may in the future enter,
into agreements with
non-U.S. entities
that are governed by the laws of, and are subject to dispute
resolution in the courts of, another country or region. We
cannot accurately predict whether such a forum would provide us
with an effective and efficient means of resolving disputes that
may arise. Further, even if we are able to obtain a satisfactory
decision through arbitration or a court proceeding, we could
have difficulty enforcing any award or judgment on a timely
basis or at all.
We also have offices in many countries outside the United States
and, as a result, our operations may be subject to risks that
may limit our ability to effectively establish, staff and manage
our offices outside the United States, including:
Our global growth (including growth in new regions in the United
States) subjects us to certain risks, including risks associated
with funding increasing headcount, integrating new offices, and
establishing effective controls and procedures to regulate the
operations of new offices. In addition, payroll expenses are
paid in local currencies and, therefore, we are exposed to risks
associated with fluctuations in the rate of exchange between the
U.S. dollar and these currencies.
Further, our business has grown rapidly and may continue to grow
in a strategic and deliberate manner. If we fail to effectively
manage our international growth, then our financial condition,
results of operations, cash flow and ability to pay cash
dividends to our stockholders, and the market price of our stock
could be adversely affected.
We may pursue growth opportunities in international markets on a
strategic and selective basis. As we invest in countries where
the U.S. dollar is not the national currency, we are
subject to international currency risks from the potential
fluctuations in exchange rates between the U.S. dollar and
the currencies of those other countries. A significant
depreciation in the value of the currency of one or more
countries where we have a significant investment may materially
affect our results of operations. We attempt to mitigate any
such effects by borrowing in the currency of the country in
which we are investing and, under certain circumstances, by
putting in place international currency put option contracts to
hedge exchange rate fluctuations. For leases denominated in
international currencies, we may use derivative financial
instruments to manage the international currency exchange risk.
We cannot assure you, however, that our efforts will
successfully neutralize all international currency risks.
Table of Contents
We have acquired and may continue to acquire properties on a
strategic and selective basis in international markets that are
new to us. When we acquire properties located in these markets,
we may face risks associated with a lack of market knowledge or
understanding of the local economy, forging new business
relationships in the area and unfamiliarity with local
government and permitting procedures. We work to mitigate such
risks through extensive diligence and research and associations
with experienced partners; however, there can be no guarantee
that all such risks will be eliminated.
As of December 31, 2008, our industrial properties located
in California represented 23.7% of the aggregate square footage
of our industrial operating properties and 22.3% of our
industrial annualized base rent, on an owned and managed basis.
Our revenue from, and the value of, our properties located in
California may be affected by local real estate conditions (such
as an oversupply of or reduced demand for industrial properties)
and the local economic climate. Business layoffs, downsizing,
industry slowdowns, changing demographics and other factors may
adversely impact Californias economic climate. Because of
the number of properties we have located in California, a
downturn in Californias economy or real estate conditions
could adversely affect our financial condition, results of
operations, cash flow and ability to pay cash dividends to our
stockholders and the market price of our stock.
We carry commercial liability, property and rental loss
insurance covering all the properties that we own and manage in
types and amounts that we believe are adequate and appropriate
given the relative risks applicable to the property, the cost of
coverage and industry practice. Certain losses, such as those
due to terrorism, windstorms, floods or seismic activity, may be
insured subject to certain limitations, including large
deductibles or co-payments and policy limits. Although we have
obtained coverage for certain acts of terrorism, with policy
specifications and insured limits that we consider commercially
reasonable given the cost and availability of such coverage, we
cannot be certain that we will be able to renew coverage on
comparable terms or collect under such policies. In addition,
there are other types of losses, such as those from riots,
bio-terrorism or acts of war, that are not generally insured in
our industry because it is not economically feasible to do so.
We may incur material losses in excess of insurance proceeds and
we may not be able to continue to obtain insurance at
commercially reasonable rates. Given current market conditions,
there can also be no assurance that the insurance companies
providing our coverage will not fail or have difficulty meeting
their coverage obligations to us. Furthermore, we cannot assure
you that our insurance companies will be able to continue to
offer products with sufficient coverage at commercially
reasonable rates. If we experience a loss that is uninsured or
that exceeds our insured limits with respect to one or more of
our properties or if our insurance companies fail to meet their
coverage commitments to us in the event of an insured loss, then
we could lose the capital invested in the damaged properties, as
well as the anticipated future revenue from those properties
and, if there is recourse debt, then we would remain obligated
for any mortgage debt or other financial obligations related to
the properties. Moreover, as the general partner of the
operating partnership, we generally will be liable for all of
the operating partnerships unsatisfied recourse
obligations, including any obligations incurred by the operating
partnership as the general partner of co-investment ventures.
Any such losses or higher insurance costs could adversely affect
our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow and
ability to pay cash dividends to our stockholders and the market
price of our stock.
A number of our properties are located in areas that are known
to be subject to earthquake activity. U.S. properties
located in active seismic areas include properties in the
San Francisco Bay Area, Los Angeles, and Seattle. Our
largest concentration of such properties is in California where,
on an owned and managed basis, as of December 31, 2008, we
had 296 industrial buildings, aggregating approximately
31.2 million square feet and representing 23.7% of our
industrial operating properties based on aggregate square
footage and 22.3% based on industrial annualized base rent, on
an owned and managed basis. International properties located in
active seismic
Table of Contents
areas include Tokyo and Osaka, Japan and Mexico City, Mexico. We
carry earthquake insurance on all of our properties located in
areas historically subject to seismic activity, subject to
coverage limitations and deductibles that we believe are
commercially reasonable. We evaluate our earthquake insurance
coverage annually in light of current industry practice through
an analysis prepared by outside consultants.
A number of our properties are located in areas that are known
to be subject to hurricane
and/or flood
risk. We carry hurricane and flood hazard insurance on all of
our properties located in areas historically subject to such
activity, subject to coverage limitations and deductibles that
we believe are commercially reasonable. We evaluate our
insurance coverage annually in light of current industry
practice through an analysis prepared by outside consultants.
We have acquired and may in the future acquire properties
subject to liabilities and without any recourse, or with only
limited recourse, with respect to unknown liabilities. As a
result, if a liability were asserted against us based upon
ownership of any of these entities or properties, then we might
have to pay substantial sums to settle it, which could adversely
affect our cash flow. Contingent or unknown liabilities with
respect to entities or properties acquired might include:
We depend on the efforts of our executive officers and other key
employees. From time to time, our personnel and their roles may
change. As part of our cost savings plan, we have reduced our
total global headcount and may do so again in the future. While
we believe that we have retained our key talent and left our
global platform intact and can find suitable employees to meet
our personnel needs, the loss of key personnel, any change in
their roles, or the limitation of their availability could
adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations,
cash flow and ability to pay dividends to our stockholders, and
the market price of our stock. We do not have employment
agreements with any of our executive officers.
Because our compensation packages include equity-based
incentives, pressure on our stock price or limitations on our
ability to award such incentives could affect our ability to
offer competitive compensation packages to our executives and
key employees. If we are unable to continue to attract and
retain our executive officers, or if compensation costs required
to attract and retain key employees become more expensive, our
performance and competitive position could be materially
adversely affected.
From time to time, certain of our executive officers and
directors may own interests in other real-estate related
businesses and investments, including de minimis holdings of the
equity securities of public and private real estate companies.
Our executive officers involvement in other real
estate-related activities could divert their attention from our
day-to-day operations. Our executive officers have entered into
non-competition agreements with us
Table of Contents
pursuant to which they have agreed not to engage in any
activities, directly or indirectly, in respect of commercial
real estate, and not to make any investment in respect of any
industrial or retail real estate, other than through ownership
of not more than 5% of the outstanding shares of a public
company engaged in such activities or through certain specified
investments. State law may limit our ability to enforce these
agreements. We will not acquire any properties from our
executive officers, directors or their affiliates unless the
transaction is approved by a majority of the disinterested and
independent (as defined by the rules of the New York Stock
Exchange) members of our board of directors with respect to that
transaction.
Our
role as general partner of the operating partnership may
conflict with the interests of our stockholders.
As the general partner of the operating partnership, we have
fiduciary obligations to the operating partnerships
limited partners, the discharge of which may conflict with the
interests of our stockholders. In addition, those persons
holding limited partnership units will have the right to vote as
a class on certain amendments to the operating
partnerships partnership agreement and individually to
approve certain amendments that would adversely affect their
rights. The limited partners may exercise these voting rights in
a manner that conflicts with the interests of our stockholders.
In addition, under the terms of the operating partnerships
partnership agreement, holders of limited partnership units will
have approval rights with respect to specified transactions that
affect all stockholders but which they may not exercise in a
manner that reflects the interests of all stockholders.
Under various environmental laws, ordinances and regulations, a
current or previous owner or operator of real estate may be
liable for the costs of investigation, removal or remediation of
certain hazardous or toxic substances or petroleum products at,
on, under, in or from its property. The costs of removal or
remediation of such substances could be substantial. These laws
typically impose liability and
clean-up
responsibility without regard to whether the owner or operator
knew of or caused the presence of the contaminants. Even if more
than one person may have been responsible for the contamination,
each person covered by the environmental laws may be held
responsible for all of the
clean-up
costs incurred. In addition, third parties may sue the owner or
operator of a site for damages based on personal injury,
property damage or other costs, including investigation and
clean-up
costs, resulting from the environmental contamination.
Environmental laws in some countries, including the United
States, also require that owners or operators of buildings
containing asbestos properly manage and maintain the asbestos,
adequately inform or train those who may come into contact with
asbestos and undertake special precautions, including removal or
other abatement, in the event that asbestos is disturbed during
building renovation or demolition. These laws may impose fines
and penalties on building owners or operators who fail to comply
with these requirements and may allow third parties to seek
recovery from owners or operators for personal injury associated
with exposure to asbestos. Some of our properties are known to
contain asbestos-containing building materials.
In addition, some of our properties are leased or have been
leased, in part, to owners and operators of businesses that use,
store or otherwise handle petroleum products or other hazardous
or toxic substances, creating a potential for the release of
such hazardous or toxic substances. Further, certain of our
properties are on, adjacent to or near other properties that
have contained or currently contain petroleum products or other
hazardous or toxic substances, or upon which others have
engaged, are engaged or may engage in activities that may
release such hazardous or toxic substances. From time to time,
we may acquire properties, or interests in properties, with
known adverse environmental conditions where we believe that the
environmental liabilities associated with these conditions are
quantifiable and that the acquisition will yield a superior
risk-adjusted return. In such an instance, we underwrite the
costs of environmental investigation,
clean-up and
monitoring into the acquisition cost and obtain appropriate
environmental insurance for the property. Further, in connection
with certain divested properties, we have agreed to remain
responsible for, and to bear the cost of, remediating or
monitoring certain environmental conditions on the properties.
Table of Contents
At the time of acquisition, we subject all of our properties to
a Phase I or similar environmental assessments by independent
environmental consultants and we may have additional
Phase II testing performed upon the consultants
recommendation. These environmental assessments have not
revealed, and we are not aware of, any environmental liability
that we believe would have a material adverse effect on our
financial condition or results of operations taken as a whole.
Nonetheless, it is possible that the assessments did not reveal
all environmental liabilities and that there are material
environmental liabilities unknown to us, or that known
environmental conditions may give rise to liabilities that are
greater than we anticipated. Further, our properties
current environmental condition may be affected by customers,
the condition of land, operations in the vicinity of the
properties (such as releases from underground storage tanks) or
by unrelated third parties. If the costs of compliance with
existing or future environmental laws and regulations exceed our
budgets for these items, then our financial condition, results
of operations, cash flow and ability to pay cash dividends to
our stockholders, and the market price of our stock could be
adversely affected.
Under the Americans with Disabilities Act, places of public
accommodation must meet certain federal requirements related to
access and use by disabled persons. Noncompliance could result
in the imposition of fines by the federal government or the
award of damages to private litigants. If we are required to
make unanticipated expenditures to comply with the Americans
with Disabilities Act, including removing access barriers, then
our cash flow and the amounts available for dividends to our
stockholders may be adversely affected. Our properties are also
subject to various federal, state and local regulatory
requirements, such as state and local fire and life-safety
requirements. We could incur fines or private damage awards if
we fail to comply with these requirements. While we believe that
our properties are currently in material compliance with these
regulatory requirements, the requirements may change or new
requirements may be imposed that could require significant
unanticipated expenditures by us that will affect our cash flow
and results of operations.
Our
failure to qualify as a real estate investment trust would have
serious adverse consequences to our stockholders.
We elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust under
Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of
1986, as amended (the Internal Revenue Code),
commencing with our taxable year ended December 31, 1997.
We believe we have operated so as to qualify as a real estate
investment trust under the Internal Revenue Code and believe
that our current organization and method of operation comply
with the rules and regulations promulgated under the Internal
Revenue Code to enable us to continue to qualify as a real
estate investment trust. However, it is possible that we have
been organized or have operated in a manner that would not allow
us to qualify as a real estate investment trust, or that our
future operations could cause us to fail to qualify.
Qualification as a real estate investment trust requires us to
satisfy numerous requirements (some on an annual and others on a
quarterly basis) established under highly technical and complex
sections of the Internal Revenue Code for which there are only
limited judicial and administrative interpretations, and
involves the determination of various factual matters and
circumstances not entirely within our control. For example, in
order to qualify as a real estate investment trust, we must
derive at least 95% of our gross income in any year from
qualifying sources. In addition, we must pay dividends to our
stockholders aggregating annually at least 90% of our real
estate investment trust taxable income (determined without
regard to the dividends paid deduction and by excluding capital
gains) and must satisfy specified asset tests on a quarterly
basis. While historically we have satisfied the distribution
requirement discussed above by making cash distributions to our
stockholders, we may choose to satisfy this requirement by
making distributions of cash or other property, including, in
limited circumstances, our own stock. For distributions with
respect to taxable years ending on or before December 31,
2009, recent Internal Revenue Service guidance allows us to
satisfy up to 90% of this distribution requirement through the
distribution of shares of our stock, if certain conditions are
met. The provisions of the Internal Revenue Code and applicable
Treasury regulations regarding qualification as a real estate
investment trust are more complicated in our case because we
hold our assets through the operating partnership. Legislation,
new regulations, administrative interpretations or
Table of Contents
court decisions could significantly change the tax laws with
respect to qualification as a real estate investment trust or
the federal income tax consequences of such qualification.
However, we are not aware of any pending tax legislation that
would adversely affect our ability to qualify as a real estate
investment trust.
If we fail to qualify as a real estate investment trust in any
taxable year, we will be required to pay federal income tax
(including any applicable alternative minimum tax) on our
taxable income at regular corporate rates. Unless we are
entitled to relief under certain statutory provisions, we would
be disqualified from treatment as a real estate investment trust
for the four taxable years following the year in which we lost
our qualification. If we lost our real estate investment trust
status, our net earnings available for investment or
distribution to stockholders would be significantly reduced for
each of the years involved. In addition, we would no longer be
required to make distributions to our stockholders.
Furthermore, we own a direct or indirect interest in certain
subsidiary REITs which elected to be taxed as a REIT under
Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code.
Provided that each subsidiary REIT qualifies as a REIT, our
interest in such subsidiary REIT will be treated as a qualifying
real estate asset for purposes of the REIT asset tests, and any
dividend income or gains derived by us from such subsidiary REIT
will generally be treated as income that qualifies for purposes
of the REIT gross income tests. To qualify as a REIT, the
subsidiary REIT must independently satisfy various REIT
qualification requirements. If such subsidiary REIT were to fail
to qualify as a REIT, and certain relief provisions did not
apply, it would be treated as a regular taxable corporation and
its income would be subject to United States federal income tax.
In addition, a failure of the subsidiary REIT to qualify as a
REIT would have an adverse effect on our ability to comply with
the REIT income and asset tests, and thus our ability to qualify
as a REIT.
From time to time, we may transfer or otherwise dispose of some
of our properties, including by contributing properties to our
co-investment venture funds. Under the Internal Revenue Code,
any gain resulting from transfers of properties we hold as
inventory or primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary
course of business is treated as income from a prohibited
transaction subject to a 100% penalty tax. We do not believe
that our transfers or disposals of property or our contributions
of properties into our co-investment ventures are prohibited
transactions. However, whether property is held for investment
purposes is a question of fact that depends on all the facts and
circumstances surrounding the particular transaction. The
Internal Revenue Service may contend that certain transfers or
dispositions of properties by us or contributions of properties
into our co-investment venture funds are prohibited
transactions. While we believe that the Internal Revenue Service
would not prevail in any such dispute, if the Internal Revenue
Service were to argue successfully that a transfer, disposition,
or contribution of property constituted a prohibited
transaction, we would be required to pay a 100% penalty tax on
any gain allocable to us from the prohibited transaction. In
addition, income from a prohibited transaction might adversely
affect our ability to satisfy the income tests for qualification
as a real estate investment trust.
We may
in the future choose to pay dividends in our own stock, in which
case you may be required to pay tax in excess of the cash you
receive.
We may distribute taxable dividends that are payable in our
stock. Under IRS Revenue Procedure
2009-15, up
to 90% of any such taxable dividend for 2008 and 2009 could be
payable in our stock. Taxable stockholders receiving such
dividends will be required to include the full amount of the
dividend as ordinary income to the extent of our current and
accumulated earnings and profits for United States federal
income tax purposes. As a result, a U.S. stockholder may be
required to pay tax with respect to such dividends in excess of
the cash received. If a U.S. stockholder sells the stock it
receives as a dividend in order to pay this tax, the sales
proceeds may be less than the amount included in income with
respect to the dividend, depending on the market price of our
stock at the time of the sale. Furthermore, with respect to
non-U.S. stockholders,
we may be required to withhold U.S. tax with respect to
such dividends, including in respect of all or a portion of such
dividend that is payable in stock. In addition, if a significant
number of our stockholders determine to sell shares of our stock
in order to pay taxes owed on dividends, it may put downward
pressure on the trading price of our stock.
Table of Contents
Risks
Associated with Ownership of Our Stock
Limitations
in our charter and bylaws could prevent a change in
control.
Certain provisions of our charter and bylaws may delay, defer or
prevent a change in control or other transaction that could
provide the holders of our common stock with the opportunity to
realize a premium over the then-prevailing market price for the
common stock. To maintain our qualification as a real estate
investment trust for federal income tax purposes, not more than
50% in value of our outstanding stock may be owned, actually or
constructively, by five or fewer individuals (as defined in the
Internal Revenue Code to include certain entities) during the
last half of a taxable year after the first taxable year for
which a real estate investment trust election is made.
Furthermore, our common stock must be held by a minimum of
100 persons for at least 335 days of a
12-month
taxable year (or a proportionate part of a short tax year). In
addition, if we, or an owner of 10% or more of our stock,
actually or constructively owns 10% or more of one of our
customers (or a customer of any partnership in which we are a
partner), then the rent received by us (either directly or
through any such partnership) from that customer will not be
qualifying income for purposes of the real estate investment
trust gross income tests of the Internal Revenue Code. To help
us maintain our qualification as a real estate investment trust
for federal income tax purposes, we prohibit the ownership,
actually or by virtue of the constructive ownership provisions
of the Internal Revenue Code, by any single person, of more than
9.8% (by value or number of shares, whichever is more
restrictive) of the issued and outstanding shares of each of our
common stock, series L preferred stock, series M
preferred stock, series O preferred stock, and
series P preferred stock (unless such limitations are
waived by our board of directors). We also prohibit the
ownership, actually or constructively, of any shares of our
series D preferred stock by any single person so that no
such person, taking into account all of our stock so owned by
such person, including any common stock or other series of
preferred stock, may own in excess of 9.8% of our issued and
outstanding capital stock (unless such limitations are waived by
our board of directors). We refer to this limitation as the
ownership limit. The charter provides that shares
acquired or held in violation of the ownership limit will be
transferred to a trust for the benefit of a designated
charitable beneficiary. The charter further provides that any
person who acquires shares in violation of the ownership limit
will not be entitled to any dividends on the shares or be
entitled to vote the shares or receive any proceeds from the
subsequent sale of the shares in excess of the lesser of the
price paid for the shares or the amount realized from the sale.
A transfer of shares in violation of the above limits may be
void under certain circumstances. The ownership limit may have
the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in
control and, therefore, could adversely affect our
stockholders ability to realize a premium over the
then-prevailing market price for the shares of our common stock
in connection with such transaction.
Our charter authorizes us to issue additional shares of common
and preferred stock and to establish the preferences, rights and
other terms of any series or class of preferred stock that we
issue. Our board of directors could establish a series or class
of preferred stock that could have the effect of delaying,
deferring or preventing a transaction, including a change in
control, that might involve a premium price for the common stock
or otherwise be in the best interests of our stockholders.
Our charter and bylaws and Maryland law also contain other
provisions that may impede various actions by stockholders
without the approval of our board of directors, which in turn
may delay, defer or prevent a transaction, including a change in
control. Those provisions in our charter and bylaws include:
Table of Contents
Those provisions provided for under Maryland law include:
In addition, our board could elect to adopt, without stockholder
approval, other provisions under Maryland law that may impede a
change in control.
If we
issue additional securities, then the investment of existing
stockholders will be diluted.
As a real estate investment trust, we are dependent on external
sources of capital and may issue common or preferred stock or
debt securities to fund our future capital needs. We have
authority to issue shares of common stock or other equity or
debt securities, and to cause the operating partnership or AMB
Property II, L.P., one of our subsidiaries, to issue limited
partnership units, in exchange for property or otherwise.
Existing stockholders have no preemptive right to acquire any
additional securities issued by the operating partnership, AMB
Property II, L.P., or us and any issuance of additional equity
securities may adversely effect the market price of our stock
and could result in dilution of an existing stockholders
investment.
As a real estate investment trust, the market value of our
equity securities, in general, is based primarily upon the
markets perception of our growth potential and our current
and potential future earnings and cash dividends. The market
value of our equity securities is based secondarily upon the
market value of our underlying real estate assets. For this
reason, shares of our stock may trade at prices that are higher
or lower than our net asset value per share. To the extent that
we retain operating cash flow for investment purposes, working
capital reserves, or other purposes, these retained funds, while
increasing the value of our underlying assets, may not
correspondingly increase the market price of our stock. Our
failure to meet the markets expectations with regard to
future earnings and cash dividends likely would adversely affect
the market price of our stock. Further, the distribution yield
on the stock (as a percentage of the price of the stock)
relative to market interest rates may also influence the price
of our stock. An increase in market interest rates might lead
prospective purchasers of our stock to expect a higher
distribution yield, which would adversely affect our
stocks market price. Additionally, if the market price of
our stock declines significantly, then we might breach certain
covenants with respect to our debt obligations, which could
adversely affect our liquidity and ability to make future
acquisitions and our ability to pay cash dividends to our
stockholders.
Our board of directors has decided to align our regular dividend
payments with the projected taxable income from recurring
operations alone. We may make special distributions going
forward, as necessary, related to taxable income associated with
any asset dispositions and gain activity. In the past, our board
of directors has suspended dividends to our stockholders, and it
is possible that they may do so again in the future, or decide
to pay dividends in our own stock as provided for in the
Internal Revenue Code.
We
could change our investment and financing policies without a
vote of stockholders.
Subject to our current investment policy to maintain our
qualification as a real estate investment trust (unless a change
is approved by our board of directors under certain
circumstances), our board of directors determines our investment
and financing policies, our growth strategy and our debt,
capitalization, distribution and operating policies. Our board
of directors may revise or amend these strategies and policies
at any time without a vote of stockholders. Any such changes may
not serve the interests of all stockholders and could adversely
affect our financial condition or results of operations,
including our ability to pay cash dividends to our stockholders.
The operating partnership and AMB Property II, L.P. had
3,439,522 common limited partnership units issued and
outstanding as of December 31, 2008, all of which are
currently exchangeable on a one-for-one basis into shares of our
common stock. In the future, the operating partnership or AMB
Property II, L.P. may issue additional limited
Table of Contents
partnership units, and we may issue shares of common stock, in
connection with the acquisition of properties or in private
placements. These shares of common stock and the shares of
common stock issuable upon exchange of limited partnership units
may be sold in the public securities markets over time, pursuant
to registration rights that we have granted, or may grant in
connection with future issuances, or pursuant to Rule 144
under the Securities Act of 1933. In addition, common stock
issued under our stock option and incentive plans may also be
sold in the market pursuant to registration statements that we
have filed or pursuant to Rule 144. As of December 31,
2008, under our stock option and incentive plans, we had
8,447,215 shares of common stock reserved and available for
future issuance, had outstanding options to purchase
6,206,678 shares of common stock (of which 5,161,609 are
vested and exercisable and 178,890 have exercise prices below
market value at December 31, 2008) and had 859,026
unvested restricted shares of common stock outstanding. Future
sales of a substantial number of shares of our common stock in
the market or the perception that such sales might occur could
adversely affect the market price of our common stock. Further,
the existence of the common limited partnership units of the
operating partnership and AMB Property II, L.P. and the shares
of our common stock reserved for issuance upon exchange of
limited partnership units and the exercise of options, and
registration rights referred to above, may adversely affect the
terms upon which we are able to obtain additional capital
through the sale of equity securities.
The design and effectiveness of our disclosure controls and
procedures and internal control over financial reporting may not
prevent all errors, misstatements or misrepresentations. While
management will continue to review the effectiveness of our
disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over
financial reporting, there can be no guarantee that our internal
control over financial reporting will be effective in
accomplishing all control objectives all of the time.
Furthermore, our disclosure controls and procedures and internal
control over financial reporting with respect to entities that
we do not control or manage or third-party entities that we may
acquire may be substantially more limited than those we maintain
with respect to the subsidiaries that we have controlled or
managed over the course of time. Deficiencies, including any
material weakness, in our internal control over financial
reporting which may occur in the future could result in
misstatements of our results of operations, restatements of our
financial statements, a decline in our stock price, or otherwise
materially adversely affect our business, reputation, results of
operations, financial condition or liquidity.
None.
INDUSTRIAL
PROPERTIES
As of December 31, 2008, we owned and managed 1,116
industrial buildings aggregating approximately
131.5 million rentable square feet (on a consolidated
basis, we had 696 industrial buildings aggregating approximately
72.8 million rentable square feet), excluding development
and renovation projects and recently completed development
projects available for sale or contribution, located in 49
global markets throughout the Americas, Europe and Asia. Our
industrial properties were 95.1% leased to 2,602 customers, the
largest of which accounted for no more than 4.1% of our
annualized base rent from our industrial properties. See
Part IV, Item 15: Note 16 of Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements for segment information
related to our operations.
Property Characteristics. Our industrial
properties, which consist primarily of warehouse distribution
facilities suitable for single or multiple customers, are
typically comprised of multiple buildings.
Table of Contents
The following table identifies types and characteristics of our
industrial buildings and each types percentage, based on
square footage, of our total owned and managed operating
portfolio:
Lease Terms. Our industrial properties are
typically subject to leases on a triple net basis,
in which customers pay their proportionate share of real estate
taxes, insurance and operating costs, or are subject to leases
on a modified gross basis, in which customers pay
expenses over certain threshold levels. In addition, most of our
leases include fixed rental increases or Consumer Price
Index-based rental increases. Lease terms typically range from
three to ten years, with a weighted average of six years,
excluding renewal options. However, the majority of our
industrial leases do not include renewal options.
Overview of Our Global Market Presence. Our
industrial properties are located in the following markets:
Within these metropolitan areas, our industrial properties are
generally concentrated in locations with limited new
construction opportunities within established, relatively large
submarkets, which we believe should provide a higher rate of
occupancy and rent growth than properties located elsewhere.
These infill locations are typically near major airports or
seaports or convenient to major highway systems and rail lines,
and are proximate to large and diverse labor pools. There is
typically broad demand for industrial space in these
centrally-located submarkets due to a diverse mix of industries
and types of industrial uses, including warehouse distribution,
light assembly and manufacturing. We generally avoid locations
at the periphery of metropolitan areas where there are fewer
constraints to the supply of additional industrial properties.
Table of Contents
Portfolio
Overview
The following includes our owned and managed operating portfolio
and development properties, investments in operating properties
through non-managed unconsolidated joint ventures, and recently
completed developments that have not yet been placed in
operations but are being held for sale or contribution:
Table of Contents
The following table summarizes the lease expirations for our
owned and managed operating properties for leases in place as of
December 31, 2008, without giving effect to the exercise of
renewal options or termination rights, if any, at or prior to
the scheduled expirations:
Table of Contents
Top Customers. As of December 31, 2008,
our largest customers by annualized base rent, on an owned and
managed basis, are set forth in the table below:
Table of Contents
OWNED AND
MANAGED OPERATING STATISTICS
Owned
and Managed Operating and Leasing
Statistics(1)
The following table summarizes key operating and leasing
statistics for all of our owned and managed operating properties
as of and for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and
2006:
Table of Contents
Owned
and Managed Same Store Operating
Statistics(1)
The following table summarizes key operating and leasing
statistics for our owned and managed same store operating
properties as of and for the years ended December 31, 2008,
2007 and 2006:
Table of Contents
Development
Properties
Development
Pipeline(1)
The following table sets forth the properties owned by us as of
December 31, 2008, that are currently under development.
Industrial
Projects Under Development
(Dollars in thousands)
Table of Contents
Completed
Development Projects Available for Sale or
Contribution(1)
The following table sets forth completed development projects
that we intend to either sell or contribute to co-investment
funds as of December 31, 2008 (dollars in thousands):
Table of Contents
Properties
Held Through Co-investment Ventures, Limited Liability Companies
and Partnerships
The following table summarizes our eight consolidated and
unconsolidated significant co-investment ventures as of
December 31, 2008:
Consolidated
Joint Ventures
As of December 31, 2008, we held interests in co-investment
ventures, limited liability companies and partnerships with
institutional investors and other third parties, which we
consolidate in our financial statements. We determine
consolidation based on standards set forth in FASB
Interpretation No. 46(R), Consolidation of Variable
Interest Entities An Interpretation of ARB
No. 51 (FIN 46) or EITF Issue
No. 04-5
(EITF 04-5),
Determining Whether a General Partner, or the General
Partners as a Group, Controls a Limited Partnership or Similar
Entity When the Limited Partners Have Certain Rights and
SOP 78-9,
Accounting for Investments in Real Estate Ventures. Based
on the guidance set forth in
EITF 04-5,
we consolidate certain joint venture investments because we
exercise significant control over major operating decisions,
such as approval of budgets, selection of property managers,
asset management, investment activity and changes in financing.
We are the general partner (or equivalent of a general partner
in entities not structured as partnerships) in a number of our
consolidated joint venture investments. In all such cases, the
limited partners in such investments (or equivalent of limited
partners in such investments which are not structured as
partnerships) do not have rights described in
EITF 04-5,
which would preclude consolidation. We consolidate certain other
joint ventures where we are not the general partner (or
equivalent of a general partner in entities not structured as
partnerships) because we have control over those entities
through majority ownership, retention of the majority of
economics, and a combination of substantive kick-out rights
and/or
substantive participating rights.
Under the agreements governing the co-investment ventures, we
and the other party to the co-investment venture may be required
to make additional capital contributions and, subject to certain
limitations, the co-investment ventures may incur additional
debt. Such agreements also impose certain restrictions on the
transfer of co-investment venture interests by us or the other
party to the co-investment venture and typically provide certain
rights to us or the other party to the co-investment venture to
sell our or their interest in the co-investment venture to the
co-investment venture or to the other co-investment venture
partner on terms specified in the agreement. In addition, under
certain circumstances, many of the co-investment ventures
include buy/sell provisions. See Part IV, Item 15:
Notes 9 and 10 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements for additional details.
Table of Contents
The table that follows summarizes our consolidated joint
ventures as of December 31, 2008 (dollars in thousands):
Unconsolidated
Joint Ventures
As of December 31, 2008, we held interests in five
significant equity investment co-investment ventures that are
not consolidated in our financial statements. We determine
consolidation based on standards set forth in FASB
Interpretation No. 46(R), Consolidation of Variable
Interest Entities An Interpretation of ARB
No. 51 (FIN 46) or EITF Issue
No. 04-5
(EITF 04-5),
Determining Whether a General Partner, or the General
Partners as a Group, Controls a Limited Partnership or Similar
Entity When the Limited Partners Have Certain Rights and
SOP 78-9,
Accounting for Investments in Real Estate Ventures. For
joint ventures that are variable interest entities as defined
under FIN 46 where we are not the primary beneficiary, we
do not consolidate the joint venture for financial reporting
purposes. For joint ventures under
EITF 04-5
where we do not exercise significant control over major
operating and management decisions, but where we exercise
significant influence, we use the equity method of accounting
and do not consolidate the joint venture for financial reporting
purposes. In such unconsolidated joint ventures, either we are
not the general partner (or general partner equivalent) and do
not hold sufficient capital or any rights that would require
consolidation or, alternatively, we are the general partner (or
the general partner equivalent) and the other partners (or
equivalent) hold substantive participating rights that override
the presumption of control.
Table of Contents
The table that follows summarizes our unconsolidated joint
ventures as of December 31, 2008 (dollars in thousands):
Table of Contents
On December 30, 2004, we formed AMB-SGP Mexico, LLC, a
co-investment venture with Industrial (Mexico) JV Pte. Ltd., a
subsidiary of GIC Real Estate Pte. Ltd., the real estate
investment subsidiary of the Government of Singapore Investment
Corporation, in which we retained an approximate 20% interest.
This interest increased to approximately 22% upon our
acquisition of AMB Property Mexico. During 2008, we contributed
three completed development projects totaling approximately
1.4 million square feet to this co-investment venture for
approximately $90.5 million. During 2007, we contributed
one approximately 0.1 million square foot operating
property for approximately $4.6 million to this
co-investment venture. In addition, we recognized development
profits from the contribution to this co-investment venture of
two completed development projects aggregating approximately
0.3 million square feet with a contribution value of
$22.9 million.
On June 30, 2005, we formed AMB Japan Fund I, L.P., a
co-investment venture with 13 institutional investors, in which
we retained an approximate 20% interest. The 13 institutional
investors have committed 49.5 billion Yen (approximately
$545.9 million in U.S. dollars, using the exchange
rate at December 31, 2008) for an approximate 80%
equity interest. During 2008, we contributed to this
co-investment venture two completed development projects,
aggregating approximately 0.9 million square feet for
approximately $174.9 million (using the exchange rate on
the date of contribution). During 2007, we contributed to this
co-investment venture one completed development project
aggregating approximately 0.5 million square feet for
approximately $84.4 million (using the exchange rate on the
date of contribution).
On October 17, 2006, we formed AMB DFS Fund I, LLC, a
merchant development co-investment venture with GE Real Estate
(GE), in which we retained an approximate 15%
interest. The co-investment venture has total investment
capacity of approximately $500.0 million to pursue
development-for-sale opportunities primarily in
U.S. markets other than those we identify as our target
markets. GE and we have committed $425.0 million and
$75.0 million of equity, respectively. No properties were
contributed to this co-investment venture during 2008. During
the year ended December 31, 2007, we contributed to this
co-investment venture approximately 82 acres of land with a
contribution value of approximately $30.3 million.
Effective October 1, 2006, we deconsolidated AMB
Institutional Alliance Fund III, L.P., an open-ended
co-investment partnership formed in 2004 with institutional
investors, on a prospective basis, due to the re-evaluation of
our accounting for our investment because of changes to the
partnership agreement regarding the general partners
rights effective October 1, 2006. On July 1, 2008, the
partners of AMB Partners II, L.P. (previously, a consolidated
co-investment venture) contributed their interests in AMB
Partners II, L.P. to AMB Institutional Alliance Fund III,
L.P. in exchange for interests in AMB Institutional Alliance
Fund III, L.P., an unconsolidated co-investment venture.
During 2008, we contributed to this co-investment venture one
approximately 0.8 million square foot operating property
and four completed development projects, aggregating
approximately 2.7 million square feet, for approximately
$274.3 million. During 2007, we contributed to this
co-investment venture one approximately 0.2 million square
foot operating property and four completed development projects,
aggregating approximately 1.0 million square feet for
approximately $116.6 million.
On June 12, 2007, we formed AMB Europe Fund I,
FCP-FIS, a Euro-denominated open-ended co-investment venture
with institutional investors, in which we retained an
approximate 20% interest upon formation. At the time of
formation, the institutional investors committed approximately
263.0 million Euros (approximately $367.5 million in
U.S. dollars, using the exchange rate at December 31,
2008) for an approximate 80% equity interest. During 2008,
we contributed to this co-investment venture two development
projects, aggregating approximately
Table of Contents
0.2 million square feet, for approximately
$35.2 million (using the exchange rate on the date of
contribution). During 2007, we contributed approximately
4.2 million square feet of operating properties and
approximately 1.8 million square feet of completed
development projects to this co-investment venture for
approximately $799.3 million (using the exchange rates on
the dates of contribution).
During 2008, we recognized gains from the contribution of real
estate interests, net, of approximately $20.0 million,
representing the portion of our interest in the contributed
properties acquired by the third-party investors for cash, as a
result of the contribution of approximately 0.8 million
square feet of operating properties to AMB Institutional
Alliance Fund III, L.P. These gains are presented in gains
from sale or contribution of real estate interests, in the
consolidated statements of operations.
During 2008, we recognized development profits of approximately
$73.9 million, as a result of the contribution 11 completed
development projects, aggregating approximately 5.2 million
square feet, to AMB Institutional Alliance Fund III, L.P.,
AMB Europe Fund I, FCP-FIS, AMB Japan Fund I, L.P. and
AMB-SGP Mexico, LLC. During 2007, we recognized development
profits of approximately $95.7 million, as a result of the
contribution of 15 completed development projects and
two land parcels, aggregating approximately 82 acres
of land, to AMB Europe Fund I, FCP-FIS, AMB-SGP Mexico,
LLC, AMB Institutional Alliance Fund III, L.P., AMB DFS
Fund I, LLC, and AMB Japan Fund I, L.P.
Under the agreements governing the co-investment ventures, we
and the other parties to the co-investment ventures may be
required to make additional capital contributions and, subject
to certain limitations, the co-investment ventures may incur
additional debt.
AMB Pier One, LLC, is a joint venture related to the 2000
redevelopment of the pier which holds our global headquarters in
San Francisco, California. On June 30, 2007, we
exercised our option to purchase the remaining equity interest
from an unrelated third party, based on the fair market value as
stipulated in the joint venture agreement in AMB Pier One, LLC,
for a nominal amount. As a result, the investment was
consolidated as of June 30, 2007.
In August 2008, a subsidiary of ours sold its approximate 5%
interest in IAT Air Cargo Facilities Income Fund, a Canadian
income trust specializing in aviation-related real estate at
Canadas international airports, as part of a tender offer
for interests in the income trust. This equity investment of
approximately $2.1 million (valued as of December 31,
2007) was included in other assets on the consolidated
balance sheets as of December 31, 2007.
As of December 31, 2008, we had $1.5 billion of
secured indebtedness, net of unamortized premiums, secured by
deeds of trust or mortgages. As of December 31, 2008, the
total gross investment book value of those properties securing
the debt was $2.1 billion. Of the $1.5 billion of
secured indebtedness, $808.1 million was consolidated
co-investment venture debt secured by properties with a gross
investment value of $1.4 billion. For additional details,
see Part II, Item 7: Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations Liquidity and Capital Resources and
Part IV, Item 15: Note 6 of Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements included in this report.
As of December 31, 2008, there were no material pending
legal proceedings to which we were a party or of which any of
our properties was the subject, the adverse determination of
which we anticipate would have a material adverse effect upon
our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
None.
Table of Contents
Our common stock trades on the New York Stock Exchange under the
symbol AMB. As of February 24, 2009, there were
approximately 470 holders of record of our common stock
(excluding shares held through The Depository
Trust Company, as nominee). Set forth below are the high
and low sales prices per share of our common stock, as reported
on the NYSE composite tape, and the distribution per share paid
or payable by us during the period from January 1, 2007
through December 31, 2008:
The payment of dividends and other distributions by us is at the
discretion of our board of directors and depends on numerous
factors, including our cash flow, financial condition and
capital requirements, real estate investment trust provisions of
the Internal Revenue Code and other factors.
Table of Contents
The following line graph compares the change in our cumulative
total stockholder return on shares of our common stock from
December 31, 2003 to December 31, 2008 to the
cumulative total return of the Standard and Poors 500
Stock Index and the NAREIT Equity REIT Total Return Index from
December 31, 2003 to December 31, 2008. The graph
assumes an initial investment of $100 in the common stock of AMB
Property Corporation and each of the indices on
December 31, 2003 and, as required by the SEC, the
reinvestment of all distributions. The return shown on the graph
is not necessarily indicative of future performance.
COMPARISON
OF 5 YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN*
Among AMB Property Corporation, The S&P 500 Index And The FTSE NAREIT Equity Index
This graph and the accompanying text are not soliciting
material, are not deemed filed with the SEC and are not to
be incorporated by reference in any filing by us under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date
hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language in
any such filing.
Table of Contents
SELECTED
COMPANY FINANCIAL AND OTHER DATA(1)
The following table sets forth selected consolidated historical
financial and other data for AMB Property Corporation on a
historical basis as of and for the years ended December 31:
Note: Effective October 1, 2006, we deconsolidated AMB
Institutional Alliance Fund III, L.P. on a prospective
basis. See footnote 2 below for further discussion of the
comparability of selected financial and other data.
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Please read the following discussion and analysis of our
consolidated financial condition and results of operations in
conjunction with the notes to the consolidated financial
statements.
Managements
Overview
Recent global market and economic conditions have been
unprecedented, challenging and unpredictable with significantly
tighter credit and declining economic growth through the fourth
quarter of 2008. Continued concerns about the availability and
cost of credit, declining real estate market and geopolitical
issues have contributed to increased market volatility and
decreased expectations for the global economy. In the fourth
quarter, added concerns fueled by the failure of several large
financial institutions and government interventions in the
U.S. financial system led to increased market uncertainty
and instability in the global capital and credit markets. These
conditions, combined with declining business activity levels and
consumer confidence and increased unemployment, have contributed
to unprecedented levels of volatility.
In light of this economic downturn, we are increasing our focus
on our operations with a special emphasis on tenant retention
and occupancy. Until the financial and real estate markets
stabilize, we are limiting our acquisition and development
activities to fulfilling prior commitments. We have realigned
and streamlined internal resources as well as our overhead
structure to meet the current and future needs of the business
and have taken further steps to strengthen our capital and
liquidity position. Our priorities are the strength of our
balance sheet, controlling expenses and managing our business
for the long term. Our goal is to do what we consider best for
long-term value creation and enhancement of our net asset value.
As we look forward, our objective is to emerge from this
downturn in a competitive position to take advantage of
opportunities as they arise, with our long term earnings
capacity enhanced.
The primary source of our revenue and earnings is rent received
from customers under long-term (generally three to ten years)
operating leases at our properties, including reimbursements
from customers for certain operating costs. We may also generate
earnings from our private capital business, which consists of
asset management fees and priority distributions, acquisition
and development fees, and promote interests and incentive
distributions from our co-investment ventures. Additionally, we
may generate earnings from the contributions of development
properties to our co-investment ventures, from the disposition
of projects in our development-for-sale and value-added
conversion programs and from land sales. We believe that our
long-term growth will be driven by our ability to:
Focus
on our balance sheet and cost structure
To position ourselves to meet the challenges of the current
business environment, we implemented a broad based cost
reduction plan in the fourth quarter of 2008. As a result, we
recognized a restructuring charge of approximately
$12.3 million in the quarter, associated with severance,
office closures and the termination of certain contractual
obligations. About one-third of the restructuring charges were
non-cash. As part of this plan, we reduced our total global
headcount by approximately 22% as well as certain forecasted
third-party expenditures. In executing these cost saving
efforts, we believe that we have preserved our ability to serve
our global customers and manage our operating portfolio. While
we have removed excess capacity in our deployment teams, we
believe that we have retained our key talent and left our global
platforms intact. Cost reductions were also made to the back
Table of Contents
office, support functions and third party costs, particularly
those that related to our global expansion efforts in India and
Poland.
During the fourth quarter, we suspended our regular quarterly
common stock dividend as we had met our 2008 REIT dividend
distribution requirement. In addition, we aligned our 2009
regular quarterly dividend payments with the projected taxable
income from recurring operations alone. Together, we believe
these actions will improve our cash position by allowing us to
retain $53.0 million of cash in the fourth quarter of 2008
and an additional $98 million over the course of 2009. We
may make special distributions going forward, as necessary,
related to taxable income associated with any asset dispositions
and gain activity.
We are currently exploring various options to monetize some of
our development and operating assets, including asset sales and
the formation of new joint ventures. On an owned and managed
basis, we have properties available for sale or contribution
with an estimated total investment upon completion of
$1.1 billion as of December 31, 2008. We may use some
or all of the proceeds from these transactions to decrease our
debt obligations, but there can be no assurance that we will
consummate any such transactions or use the proceeds to pay our
debt obligations.
Our
liquidity position
As a result of the current market conditions, the cost and
availability of credit has been and may continue to be adversely
affected by illiquid credit markets and wider credit spreads.
Concern about the stability of the markets generally and the
strength of counterparties specifically has led many lenders and
institutional investors to reduce, and in some cases, cease to
provide funding to businesses and consumers. We believe our
current maturity schedule is well-laddered. As of
December 31, 2008, our total consolidated debt maturities
for 2009 were $782.6 million, excluding principal
amortization. Assuming that we exercise available extension
options, our total 2009 consolidated debt maturities would be
$340.7 million, excluding principal amortization. Our total
unconsolidated debt maturities for 2009 were $212.1 million
as of December 31, 2008, excluding principal amortization.
Assuming we exercise available extension options, our total 2009
unconsolidated debt maturities would be $173.4 million,
excluding principal amortization. As of December 31, 2008,
we had $710.2 million available for future borrowings under
our three multi-currency lines of credit and had cash and cash
equivalents of $223.9 million. While we believe that we
have sufficient working capital and capacity under our credit
facilities to continue our business operations as usual in the
near-term, continued turbulence in the global markets and
economies and prolonged declines in business and consumer
spending may adversely affect our liquidity and financial
condition, as well as the liquidity and financial condition of
our customers. If these market conditions persist in the
long-term, they may limit our ability, and the ability of our
customers, to timely replace maturing liabilities and access the
capital markets to meet liquidity needs.
If the long-term debt ratings of the operating partnership fall
below current levels, the borrowing cost of debt under our
unsecured credit facilities and certain term loans may increase.
In addition, if the long-term debt ratings of the operating
partnership fall below investment grade, we may be unable to
request borrowings in currencies other than U.S. dollars or
Japanese Yen, as applicable. However, the lack of other currency
borrowings does not affect our ability to fully draw down under
the credit facilities or term loans. While we currently do not
expect the long-term debt ratings of the operating partnership
to fall below investment grade, in the event that the ratings do
fall below those levels, we may be unable to exercise our
options to extend the term of our credit facilities or our
$230.0 million secured term loan credit agreement, and the
loss of our ability to borrow in foreign currencies could affect
our ability to optimally hedge our borrowings against foreign
currency exchange rate changes. In addition, based on publicly
available information regarding our lenders, we currently do not
expect to lose borrowing capacity under our existing lines of
credit and as a result of a dissolution, bankruptcy,
consolidation, merger or other business combination among our
lenders. Our access to funds under our credit facilities is
dependent on the ability of the lenders that are parties to such
facilities to meet their funding commitments to us. If we do not
have sufficient cash flows and income from our operations to
meet our financial commitments and lenders are not able to meet
their funding commitments to us, our business, results of
operations, cash flows and financial condition could be
adversely affected.
Certain of our third party indebtedness is held by our
consolidated or unconsolidated joint ventures. In the event that
our joint venture partner is unable to meet its obligations
under our joint venture agreements or the third
Table of Contents
party debt agreements, we may elect to pay our joint venture
partners portion of debt to avoid foreclosure on the
mortgaged property or permit the lender to foreclose on the
mortgaged property to meet the joint ventures debt
obligations. In either case, we would face a loss of income and
asset value on the property.
In addition, a continued increase in the cost of credit and
inability to access the capital and credit markets may adversely
impact the occupancy of our properties, the disposition of our
properties, private capital raising and contribution of
properties to our co-investment ventures. If we are unable to
contribute completed development properties to our co-investment
ventures or sell our completed development projects to third
parties, we will not be able to recognize gains from the
contribution or sale of such properties and, as a result, our
net income available to our common stockholders and our funds
from operations will decrease. Additionally, business layoffs,
downsizing, industry slowdowns and other similar factors that
affect our customers may adversely impact our business and
financial condition. Furthermore, general uncertainty in the
real estate markets has resulted in conditions where the pricing
of certain real estate assets may be difficult due to
uncertainty with respect to capitalization rates and valuations,
among other things, which may add to the difficulty of buyers or
our co-investment ventures to obtain financing on favorable
terms to acquire such properties or cause potential buyers to
not complete acquisitions of such properties. The market
uncertainty with respect to capitalization rates and real estate
valuations also adversely impacts our net asset value.
In the event that we do not have sufficient cash available to us
through our operations to continue operating our business as
usual, we may need to find alternative ways to increase our
liquidity. Such alternatives may include, without limitation,
divesting ourselves of properties, whether or not they otherwise
meet our strategic objectives to keep in the long term, at less
than optimal terms; issuing and selling our debt and equity in
public or private transactions under less than optimal
conditions; entering into leases with our customers at lower
rental rates or less than optimal terms; or entering into lease
renewals with our existing customers without an increase in
rental rates at turnover. There can be no assurance, however,
that such alternative ways to increase our liquidity will be
available to us. Additionally, taking such measures to increase
our liquidity may adversely affect our business, results of
operations and financial condition.
Our main financial covenants with respect to our credit
facilities generally relate to fixed charge or debt service
coverage, liabilities to asset value, debt to asset value and
unencumbered cash flow. As of December 31, 2008, we were in
compliance with all of these covenants. There can be no
assurance, however, that if the financial markets and economic
conditions continue to deteriorate, that we will be able to
continue to comply with our financial covenants.
Impairment
and restructuring charges
We recognized charges in the fourth quarter of 2008 related to
the valuation of our development program and reduction in
personnel of approximately $219.5 million on an owned and
managed basis ($218.0 million on a consolidated basis);
these charges were almost entirely non-cash. The impairment
charge on the assets under development and those available for
sale or contribution on an owned or managed basis totaled
approximately $100.7 million ($99.2 million on a
consolidated basis), reflecting a 16% decline from the
$617.4 million cost basis of the assets written down. The
majority of the impairment charges related to assets in the
Americas, with the remainder primarily in Europe. The impairment
charge on the land inventory totaled approximately
$94.7 million, reflecting a 34% decline from the
$278.9 million cost basis of the land written down. These
impairments were related to land inventory in the Americas. We
also incurred approximately $11.8 million in charges for
the write-off of pursuit costs related to development projects
that we no longer plan to commence and reserves against tax
assets associated with the reduction in development activity, as
well as approximately $12.3 million of restructuring
charges associated with severance, office closures and the
termination of certain contractual obligations.
An impairment charge is recognized when the book value of a
property or land parcel is greater than its estimated fair
value, based on the intended use and holding period. The
intended use of an asset, either held for sale or held for the
long term, can significantly impact how impairment is measured.
If an asset is intended to be sold, impairment is determined
using the estimated fair value. If an asset is intended to be
held for the long term, impairment is recognized if undiscounted
cash flows over the entire holding period, including a residual
value, are less than the cost basis. We determined impairment
based upon estimated fair market values which are consistent
Table of Contents
with our business model to sell or contribute the assets we
develop. When available, current market information was used to
determine capitalization and rental growth rates. When market
information was not readily available, the inputs were based on
our understanding of market conditions and the experience of the
management team, although actual results could differ
significantly from our estimates. In a few instances, current
comparative sales values were available and used to establish
fair value. Additional impairments may be necessary in the
future in the event that market conditions continue to
deteriorate and impact the factors used to estimate fair value.
We also utilized the knowledge of our regional teams and the
recent valuations of our two open-ended funds, which contain a
large, geographically-diversified pool of assets, all of which
were subject to third-party appraisals at year end.
In order to comply with disclosure requirements as outlined in
SFAS No. 157, the designation of the level of inputs
used in the fair value models must be determined. Inputs used in
establishing fair value for real estate assets generally fall
within level three, which are characterized as requiring
significant judgment as little or no current market activity may
be available for validation. The main indicator used to
establish the classification of the inputs was current market
conditions that, in many instances, resulted in the use of
significant unobservable inputs in establishing fair value
measurements. See Part IV, Item 15: Note 3 of the
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a
more detailed discussion of the real estate impairment losses
recorded in our results of operations during the fourth quarter
of 2008.
Market
price of our shares
Recent global financial market and economic conditions have
adversely impacted the market price per share of our common
stock. Our market equity was $2.39 billion as of
December 31, 2008, compared to $5.94 billion as of
December 31, 2007. We define market equity as the total
number of outstanding shares of our common stock and common
limited partnership units multiplied by the closing price per
share of our common stock at the relevant period end. The
factors impacting the price per share of our common stock are
discussed under the heading Business Risks in
Part I, Item 1A of this report.
Customer
bankruptcies
From a customer receivables standpoint, as of December 31,
2008, we believe that account receivables delinquency levels
were consistent with our historical norms and we believe that we
maintain adequate bad debt reserves. Although we believe that
the number of bankruptcies of our customers increased during the
fourth quarter of 2008, we believe the impact of such
bankruptcies on our business was not significant for the year
ended December 31, 2008. Our account receivables
delinquencies may not continue at the same levels, our bad debt
reserves may not be sufficient to cover such delinquencies as
they occur and the level of customer bankruptcies may increase
to levels that could be significant to our operations.
Real estate fundamentals in the United States continued to
weaken in the fourth quarter of 2008 as the national economy
slowed further. We anticipate that the U.S. and global
economies will decline further in 2009. Customer decision-making
is prolonged, as commitments for new space are being eliminated
or put on hold with only time critical leasing decisions being
made. According to data provided by Torto Wheaton Research as of
February 19, 2009, availability in the United States was
11.4% for the quarter ended December 31, 2008, up
70 basis points from the prior quarter and 200 basis
points from the fourth quarter of 2007. Also, according to Torto
Wheaton Research, absorption was negative 47.1 million
square feet in the fourth quarter of 2008, and construction
completions were 44.5 million square feet, down from
45.6 million square feet in the prior quarter. For 2008,
absorption was negative 94.1 million square feet, the
lowest since 2001. While we expect the delivery pipeline to
decline substantially, we expect net absorption to be negative
in 2009.
We believe the strongest industrial markets in the United States
continue to be the primary infill coastal markets tied to global
trade. While demand has weakened notably across the U.S., due
primarily to the weakening economy, we believe our coastal
markets will continue to outperform other U.S. industrial
markets. Outside the United States, while activity is
moderating, we believe that we will continue to experience
demand for our
Table of Contents
distribution facilities due to the reconfiguration of supply
chains and customer requirements for upgraded distribution space
to modern facilities.
The table below summarizes key operating and leasing statistics
for our owned and managed operating properties for the years
ended December 31, 2008 and 2007:
Although the economy continued to slow, we maintained strong
occupancy levels at December 31, 2008 compared to
September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007. Our owned
and managed portfolio occupancy at December 31, 2008 was
95.1%, down from 95.4% at September 30, 2008 and 96.0% at
December 31, 2007, while average occupancy was 94.9%, down
from 95.0% at September 30, 2008 and 95.1% at
December 31, 2007. During the three months ended
December 31, 2008, rent on renewed and re-leased space in
our operating portfolio increased 2.5% on an owned and managed
basis, excluding expense reimbursements, rental abatements,
percentage rents and straight-line rents. Rental rates on lease
renewals and rollovers in our portfolio increased 3.1% for the
trailing four quarters ended December 31, 2008. During
2008, cash-basis same store net operating income, with and
without the effect of lease termination fees, grew by 4.0% and
0.2%, respectively, on an owned and managed basis. Excluding the
impact of foreign currency exchange rate movements against the
U.S. dollar, cash-basis same store net operating income
without the effect of lease termination fees increased 2.3%
during the year ended
Table of Contents
December 31, 2008. At December 31, 2008, cash-basis
same store net operating income, with and without the effect of
lease termination fees, increased by 4.4% and 3.7%,
respectively, on an owned and managed basis. See
Supplemental Earnings Measures for a discussion of
cash-basis same store net operating income and a reconciliation
of cash-basis same store net operating income and net income.
Our development business consists of conventional development,
build-to-suit development, redevelopment, value-added
conversions and land sales. We generate earnings from our
development business through the disposition or contribution of
projects from these activities.
Despite the cyclical downturn in the U.S. and global
economies, we believe that, over the long term, customer demand
for new industrial space in strategic markets tied to global
trade will continue to outpace supply, most notably in major
gateway markets in Asia and Europe. To capitalize on this
demand, we intend to opportunistically develop in many of our
global markets that are essential to global trade. However,
given the uncertainty in the global economy, we curtailed
development activity, and as a result, development starts for
the full year decreased 50% over 2007 with 69% of our 2008
development starts outside the United States. For 2009, our
development activity will be limited to fulfilling prior
commitments until the financial and real estate markets
stabilize. In addition to our committed development pipeline, we
hold a total of 2,503 acres of land for future development
or sale, approximately 86% of which is located in North America,
including 79 acres that are held in an unconsolidated joint
venture. We currently estimate that these 2,503 acres of
land could support approximately 45.1 million square feet
of future development. Our long-term capital allocation goal is
to have approximately 50% of our owned and managed operating
portfolio invested in
non-U.S. markets
based on annualized base rent.
We believe that our historical investment focus on industrial
real estate in some of the worlds most strategic infill
markets positions us to create value through the select
conversion of industrial properties to higher and better uses
(value-added conversions). Generally, we expect to sell to third
parties these value-added conversion projects at some point in
the re-entitlement/conversion process, thus recognizing the
enhanced value of the underlying land that supports the
propertys repurposed use. Value-added conversions involve
the repurposing of industrial properties to a higher and better
use, including office, residential, retail, research &
development or manufacturing. Activities required to prepare the
property for conversion to a higher and better use may include
such activities as rezoning, redesigning, reconstructing and
retenanting. The sales price of a value-added conversion project
is generally based on the underlying land value, reflecting its
ultimate higher and better use and as such, little to no
residual value is ascribed to the industrial building. Due to
dislocation in the housing industry, we do not believe that this
is the optimal time to market certain value-added conversion
projects, in particular, those intended to include a residential
component. We remain committed to the viability of this
development activity and believe that a well-timed approach to
executing value-added conversion transactions will enhance
stockholder value over the long term.
Since our initial public offering in 1997, we have formed eleven
co-investment ventures and raised approximately
$3.1 billion of private capital from third parties as
equity in such co-investment ventures. Eight of these
co-investment ventures are still active in the United States,
Mexico, Europe and Japan: AMB Institutional Alliance
Fund III, L.P., AMB Europe Fund I, FCP-FIS, AMB Japan
Fund I, L.P., AMB-SGP Mexico, LLC, AMB DFS Fund I,
LLC, AMB-SGP, L.P., AMB Institutional Alliance Fund II,
L.P., and
AMB-AMS, L.P.
We believe that our co-investment program with private-capital
investors will continue to serve as a source of revenues and
capital for new investments. Through these co-investment
ventures, we typically earn acquisition fees, asset management
fees and priority distributions, as well as promote interests
and incentive distributions based on the performance of the
co-investment ventures; however, we cannot assure you that we
will continue to do so. Through contribution of development
properties to our co-investment ventures, we expect to recognize
value creation from our development pipeline. In anticipation of
the formation of future co-investment ventures, we may also hold
acquired and newly developed properties for contribution to such
future co-investment ventures.
Table of Contents
Equityholders in two of our co-investment ventures, AMB
Institutional Alliance Fund III, L.P. and AMB Europe
Fund I, FCP-FIS, have a right to request that the ventures
redeem their interests under certain conditions. The redemption
right of investors in AMB Institutional Alliance Fund III,
L.P. is currently exercisable, and as of December 31, 2008,
this co-investment venture had $132.7 million of
outstanding redemption requests based on the co-investment
ventures net asset value at December 31, 2008. The
redemption right of investors in AMB Europe Fund I, FCP-FIS
is exercisable beginning after July 1, 2011. Although such
redemption rights generally do not require the co-investment
ventures to allocate newly acquired capital to cover redemption
activity, there can be no assurance that such allocation will
not occur and will not occur in such magnitude that will affect
our contribution of properties to the ventures. While we have no
obligation to fund redemption requests, we plan to meet our
redemptions as cash becomes available through property sales,
financings and new capital contributions.
As of December 31, 2008, we owned approximately
78.7 million square feet of our properties (49.2% of the
total operating and development portfolio) through our
consolidated and unconsolidated co-investment ventures. We may
make additional investments through these co-investment ventures
or new co-investment ventures in the future and presently plan
to do so. Given the current economic environment, however, the
pace of new private capital commitments has slowed significantly.
Summary
of Key Transactions in 2008
During the year ended December 31, 2008, we completed the
following significant capital deployment and other transactions:
See Part IV, Item 15: Notes 4 and 5 of the
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a
more detailed discussion of our acquisition, development and
disposition activity.
During the year ended December 31, 2008, we completed the
following significant capital markets and other financing
transactions:
Table of Contents
See Part IV, Item 15: Notes 6, 9 and 11 of the
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a
more detailed discussion of our capital markets transactions.
Our discussion and analysis of financial condition and results
of operations is based on our consolidated financial statements,
which have been prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the U.S. (GAAP). The
preparation of these financial statements requires us to make
estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of
assets, liabilities and contingencies as of the date of the
financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during the reporting periods. We evaluate our
assumptions and estimates on an on-going basis. We base our
estimates on historical experience and on various other
assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the
circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making
judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities
that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results
may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or
conditions. We believe the following critical accounting
policies affect our more significant judgments and estimates
used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.
Investments in Real Estate. Investments in
real estate and leasehold interests are stated at cost unless
circumstances indicate that cost cannot be recovered, in which
case, an adjustment to the carrying value of the property is
made to reduce it to its estimated fair value. We also regularly
review the impact of above or below-market leases, in-place
leases and lease origination costs for acquisitions, and record
an intangible asset or liability accordingly.
Carrying values for financial reporting purposes are reviewed
for impairment on a
property-by-property
basis whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that
the carrying value of a property may not be fully recoverable.
When the carrying value of a property or land parcel is greater
than its estimated fair value, based on the intended use and
holding period, an impairment charge to earnings is recognized
for the excess over its estimated fair value less costs to sell.
The intended use of an asset, either held for sale or held for
the long term, can significantly impact how impairment is
measured. If an asset is intended to be held for the long term,
the impairment
Table of Contents
analysis is based on a two-step test. The first test measures
estimated expected future cash flows over the holding period,
including a residual value (undiscounted and without interest
charges), against the carrying value of the property. If the
asset fails the test, then the asset carrying value is measured
against the lower of cost or the present value of expected cash
flows over the expected hold period. An impairment charge to
earnings is recognized for the excess of the assets
carrying value over the lower of cost or the present values of
expected cash flows over the expected hold period. If an asset
is intended to be sold, impairment is determined using the
estimated fair value less costs to sell. The estimation of
expected future net cash flows is inherently uncertain and
relies on assumptions regarding current and future economic and
market conditions and the availability of capital. We determine
the estimated fair values based on our assumptions regarding
rental rates, costs to complete,
lease-up and
holding periods, as well as sales prices or contribution values.
When available, current market information was used to determine
capitalization and rental growth rates. When market information
was not readily available, the inputs were based on our
understanding of market conditions and the experience of the
management team. Actual results could differ significantly from
our estimates. The discount rates used in the fair value
estimates ranged from 8-11% and represent a rate commensurate
with the indicated holding period with a premium layered on for
risk. In a few instances, current comparative sales values were
available and used to establish fair value. We also utilize the
knowledge of our regional teams and the recent valuations of our
two open-ended funds, which contain a large, geographically
diversified pool of assets, all of which are subject to
third-party appraisals at year end.
Revenue Recognition. We record rental revenue
from operating leases on a straight-line basis over the term of
the leases and maintain an allowance for estimated losses that
may result from the inability of our customers to make required
payments. If customers fail to make contractual lease payments
that are greater than our allowance for doubtful accounts,
security deposits and letters of credit, then we may have to
recognize additional doubtful account charges in future periods.
We monitor the liquidity and creditworthiness of our customers
on an on-going basis by reviewing their financial condition
periodically as appropriate. Each period we review our
outstanding accounts receivable, including straight-line rents,
for doubtful accounts and provide allowances as needed. We also
record lease termination fees when a customer has executed a
definitive termination agreement with us and the payment of the
termination fee is not subject to any conditions that must be
met or waived before the fee is due to us. If a customer remains
in the leased space following the execution of a definitive
termination agreement, the applicable termination fees are
deferred and recognized over the term of such customers
occupancy.
Property Dispositions. We report real estate
dispositions in three separate categories on our consolidated
statements of operations. First, when we divest a portion of our
interests in real estate entities or properties, gains from the
sale represent the interests acquired by third-party investors
for cash and are included in gains from sale or contribution of
real estate interests in the statement of operations. Second, we
dispose of value-added conversion projects and build-to-suit and
speculative development projects for which we have not generated
material operating income prior to sale. The gain or loss
recognized from the disposition of these projects is reported
net of estimated taxes, when applicable, and are included in
development profits, net of taxes, within continuing operations
of the statement of operations. Third, we dispose of value-added
conversion and other redevelopment projects for which we may
have generated material operating income prior to sale. The gain
or loss recognized is reported net of estimated taxes, when
applicable, in the development gains line within discontinued
operations. Lastly, Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(SFAS) No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or
Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, requires us to separately
report as discontinued operations the historical operating
results attributable to operating properties sold and the
applicable gain or loss on the disposition of the properties,
which is included in development gains and gains from
dispositions of real estate, net of taxes and minority
interests, in the statement of operations. The consolidated
statements of operations for prior periods are also adjusted to
conform with this classification. There is no impact on our
previously reported consolidated financial position, net income
or cash flows. In all cases, gains and losses are recognized
using the full accrual method of accounting. Gains relating to
transactions which do not meet the requirements of the full
accrual method of accounting are deferred and recognized when
the full accrual method of accounting criteria are met.
Joint Ventures. We hold interests in both
consolidated and unconsolidated joint ventures. We determine
consolidation based on standards set forth in FASB
Interpretation No. 46(R), Consolidation of Variable
Interest Entities An Interpretation of ARB
No. 51 (FIN 46) or EITF Issue
No. 04-5
(EITF 04-5),
Determining Whether a General Partner, or the General
Partners as a Group, Controls a Limited Partnership or Similar
Entity When the
Table of Contents
Limited Partners Have Certain Rights and
SOP 78-9,
Accounting for Investments in Real Estate Ventures. For
joint ventures that are variable interest entities as defined
under FIN 46 where we are not the primary beneficiary, we
do not consolidate the joint venture for financial reporting
purposes. Based on the guidance set forth in
EITF 04-5,
we consolidate certain joint venture investments because we
exercise significant control over major operating decisions,
such as approval of budgets, selection of property managers,
asset management, investment activity and changes in financing.
We are the general partner (or equivalent of a general partner
in entities not structured as partnerships) in a number of our
consolidated joint venture investments. In all such cases, the
limited partners in such investments (or equivalent of limited
partners in such investments which are not structured as
partnerships) do not have rights described in
EITF 04-5,
which would preclude consolidation. We consolidate certain other
joint ventures where we are not the general partner (or
equivalent of a general partner in entities not structured as
partnerships) because we have control over those entities
through majority ownership, retention of the majority of
economics, and a combination of substantive kick-out rights
and/or
substantive participating rights. For joint ventures under
EITF 04-5
where we do not exercise significant control over major
operating and management decisions, but where we exercise
significant influence, we use the equity method of accounting
and do not consolidate the joint venture for financial reporting
purposes. In such unconsolidated joint ventures, either we are
not the general partner (or general partner equivalent) and do
not hold sufficient capital or any rights that would require
consolidation or, alternatively, we are the general partner (or
the general partner equivalent) and the other partners (or
equivalent) hold substantive participating rights that override
the presumption of control.
Based on the guidance set forth in
EITF 04-5,
we consolidate certain co-investment venture investments because
we exercise significant control over major operating decisions,
such as approval of budgets, selection of property managers,
asset management, investment activity and changes in financing.
For co-investment ventures under
EITF 04-5,
where we do not exercise significant control over major
operating and management decisions, but where we exercise
significant influence, we use the equity method of accounting
and do not consolidate the co-investment venture for financial
reporting purposes.
Capitalized General and Administrative
Expenses. In conformity with
SFAS No. 67, Accounting for Costs and Initial
Rental Operations of Real Estate Projects, we capitalize
costs, such as general and administrative expenses that are
directly related to our development projects, based on time
spent on development activities.
Real Estate Investment Trust. As a real estate
investment trust, we generally will not be subject to corporate
level federal income taxes in the United States if we meet
minimum distribution requirements, and certain income, asset and
share ownership tests. However, some of our subsidiaries may be
subject to federal and state taxes. In addition, foreign
entities may also be subject to the taxes of the host country.
An income tax allocation is required to be estimated on our
taxable income arising from our taxable real estate investment
trust subsidiaries and international entities. A deferred tax
component could arise based upon the differences in GAAP versus
tax income for items such as depreciation and gain recognition.
However, we believe the net deferred tax is an immaterial
component of our consolidated balance sheet.
Foreign Currency Remeasurement and
Translation. Transactions that require the
remeasurement and translation of a foreign currency are recorded
according to the guidance set forth in SFAS No. 52,
Foreign Currency Translation. The U.S. dollar is the
functional currency for our subsidiaries formed in the United
States, Mexico and certain subsidiaries in Europe. Other than
Mexico and certain subsidiaries in Europe, the functional
currency for our subsidiaries operating outside the United
States is generally the local currency of the country in which
the entity or property is located, mitigating the effect of
currency exchange gains and losses. Our subsidiaries whose
functional currency is not the U.S. dollar translate their
financial statements into U.S. dollars. Assets and
liabilities are translated at the exchange rate in effect as of
the financial statement date. We translate income statement
accounts using the average exchange rate for the period and
significant nonrecurring transactions using the rate on the
transaction date.
Our international subsidiaries may have transactions denominated
in currencies other than their functional currencies. In these
instances, non-monetary assets and liabilities are reflected at
the historical exchange rate, monetary assets and liabilities
are remeasured at the exchange rate in effect at the end of the
period and income statement accounts are remeasured at the
average exchange rate for the period. We also record gains or
losses in the income statement when a transaction with a third
party, denominated in a currency other than the entitys
functional
Table of Contents
currency, is settled and the functional currency cash flows
realized are more or less than expected based upon the exchange
rate in effect when the transaction was initiated.
CONSOLIDATED
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The analysis below includes changes attributable to same store
growth, acquisitions, development activity and divestitures. The
same store pool includes all properties that are owned as of the
end of both the current and prior year reporting periods and
excludes development properties stabilized after
December 31, 2006 (generally defined as properties that are
90% leased or properties that have been substantially complete
for at least 12 months). As of December 31, 2008, the
same store industrial pool consisted of properties aggregating
approximately 65.0 million square feet. Our future
financial condition and results of operations, including rental
revenues, may be impacted by the acquisition of additional
properties and dispositions. Our future revenues and expenses
may vary materially from historical results.
For
the Years Ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 (dollars in
millions):
U.S. industrial same store rental revenues decreased
$35.4 million from the prior year primarily due to the
decrease of $40.6 million in same store revenues from the
contribution of the interests in AMB Partners II, L.P.
(previously, a consolidated co-investment venture) to AMB
Institutional Alliance Fund III, L.P., an unconsolidated
co-investment venture, on July 1, 2008. Same store rental
revenues for the year ended December 31, 2008 would have
been $574.7 million if the interests in AMB Partners II,
L.P. had not been contributed as of December 31, 2008. The
decrease of $40.6 million related to the contribution of
interests in AMB Partners II, L.P. was offset by an
increase of $5.2 million, primarily due to increased rates
and decreases in free rent. The increase in rental revenues from
development of $0.5 million was primarily due to increased
occupancy at several of our development projects. Other
industrial revenues include rental revenues from development
projects that have reached certain levels of operation but are
not yet part of the same store operating pool of properties. The
increase in these revenues of
Table of Contents
$8.1 million reflects the number of projects that have
reached these levels of operation and higher rent levels during
2008. The increase in revenues from
non-U.S. industrial
properties of $32.7 million was primarily due to the
acquisition of 2.4 million square feet of operating
properties during 2008 as well as an increase in square footage
leased at our completed development properties. The increase in
private capital revenues of $36.7 million was primarily due
to the receipt of an incentive distribution of
$33.0 million for AMB Institutional Alliance Fund III,
L.P., an incentive distribution of $1.0 million in
connection with the sale of the partnership interests in
AMB/Erie, L.P., including its final real estate asset to AMB
Institutional Alliance Fund III, L.P., and an increase in
asset management fees as a result of an increase in total
unconsolidated assets under management, partially offset by a
decrease in acquisition fees.
Same store properties operating expenses decreased
$14.0 million from the prior year primarily due to a
decrease of $10.5 million from the contribution of the
interests in AMB Partners II, L.P. (previously, a consolidated
co-investment venture) to AMB Institutional Alliance
Fund III, L.P., an unconsolidated co-investment venture, on
July 1, 2008. The decrease of $3.5 million, excluding
the effect of the AMB Partners II, L.P. contribution, was
primarily due to decreased repairs and maintenance expense as
well as decreases in real estate taxes and insurance expense.
Other industrial expenses include expenses from divested
properties that have been contributed to unconsolidated
co-investment ventures, which are not classified as discontinued
operations in our consolidated financial statements, and
development properties that have reached certain levels of
operation but are not yet part of the same store operating pool
of properties. The decrease in these costs of $2.1 million
during the year ended December 31, 2008 was primarily due
to the decrease in our development-start and acquisition
activities. Development starts for the full year 2008 totaled
$544.7 million, a 50 percent decrease from
$1.1 billion in 2007. The decrease was partially offset by
the contribution of one operating property totaling
0.8 million square feet during 2008. The increase in
property operating costs for
non-U.S. industrial
properties of $28.1 million was primarily due to the
acquisition of 2.4 million square feet of operating
properties during 2008, as well as an increase in square footage
leased at our completed development properties. The increase in
depreciation and amortization expense of $6.8 million was
primarily due to the recognition of $4.3 million of
depreciation expense resulting from
Table of Contents
the reclassification of $76.7 million from properties held
for contribution to investments in real estate. The increase in
general and administrative expenses of $14.5 million was
primarily due to an increase in personnel costs, resulting from
increased employee headcount in the first three quarters of 2008
as well as an increase in professional services, and taxes.
During the year ended December 31, 2008, we recorded
$12.3 million in restructuring charges due to the
implementation of a broad-based cost reduction plan, which
included a reduction in global headcount, office closure costs
and the termination of certain contractual obligations. The
increase in real estate impairment losses was primarily a result
of changes in the economic environment in addition to the
write-off of pursuit costs. See Part IV, Item 15:
Note 3 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements for a more detailed discussion of the real
estate impairment losses recorded in our results of operations
during the fourth quarter of 2008. The decrease in other
expenses of $4.6 million was primarily due to a loss on our
non-qualified deferred compensation plans during the year ended
December 31, 2008, compared to a gain during the year ended
December 31, 2007.
Development profits represent gains from the sale or
contribution of development projects including land. See the
development sales and development contributions tables and
Property Divestitures in Capital
Resources for a discussion of the development asset sales
and contributions and the associated development profits during
the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007. During the year
ended December 31, 2008, we contributed an operating
property for approximately $66.2 million, aggregating
approximately 0.8 million square feet, into AMB
Institutional Alliance Fund III, L.P. As a result, we
recognized a gain of $20.0 million on the contribution,
representing the portion of our interest in the contributed
property acquired by the third-party investors for cash. During
the year ended December 31, 2007, we contributed
4.2 million square feet in operating properties into AMB
Europe Fund I, FCP-FIS, contributed a 0.2 million
square foot operating property into AMB Institutional Alliance
Fund III, L.P., and contributed an operating property
aggregating approximately 0.1 million square feet into
AMB-SGP Mexico, LLC, for a total of approximately
$524.9 million. As a result of these contributions, we
recognized gains from the contribution of real estate interests
of approximately $73.4 million, representing the portion of
our interest in the contributed properties acquired by the
third-party investors for cash.
The increase in equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint
ventures of $9.7 million for the year ended
December 31, 2008 as compared to the year ended
December 31, 2007 was primarily due to the contribution of
the interests in AMB Partners II, L.P. (previously, a
consolidated co-investment venture) to AMB Institutional
Alliance Fund III, L.P., an unconsolidated co-investment
venture, as well as growth in our unconsolidated assets under
management. Other (expense) income decreased $25.4 million
from the prior year primarily due to foreign currency exchange
rate loss, a loss on our non qualified deferred compensation
plan of $7.8 million, the recognition of a
$5.5 million loss on impairment of an investment and a
decrease in interest income of approximately $3.3 million,
partially offset by an increase in third party management fees.
During the year ended December 31, 2007, we recognized a
gain on currency remeasurement of approximately
$3.1 million, compared to a loss of approximately
$5.7 million in 2008. Additionally, other income during the
year ended December 31, 2007 included insurance proceeds of
approximately $2.9 million related to losses from
Hurricanes Katrina and Wilma. Interest expense increased
$6.6 million as result of increased total consolidated debt
at December 31, 2008.
Table of Contents
During the year ended December 31, 2008, we sold an
approximate 0.1 million square foot industrial operating
property for a sale price of $3.6 million, with a resulting
net gain of $0.7 million, and also recognized a deferred
gain of approximately $1.1 million on the divestiture of
one industrial building, aggregating approximately
0.1 million square feet, for a price of $3.5 million,
which was disposed of on December 31, 2007. During the year
ended December 31, 2007, we divested ourselves of three
industrial buildings, aggregating approximately 0.3 million
square feet, for an aggregate price of $120.0 million, with
a resulting net gain of $2.0 million, and two value-added
conversion projects resulting in a gain of approximately
$60.0 million.
On April 17, 2007, the operating partnership redeemed all
800,000 of its outstanding 7.95% Series J Cumulative
Redeemable Preferred Limited Partnership Units and all 800,000
of its outstanding 7.95% Series K Cumulative Redeemable
Preferred Limited Partnership Units. In addition, AMB Property
II, L.P., one of our subsidiaries, repurchased all 510,000 of
its outstanding 8.00% Series I Cumulative Redeemable
Preferred Limited Partnership Units. As a result of the
redemptions and repurchase, we recognized a reduction of income
available to common stockholders of $2.9 million for the
original issuance costs during the year ended December 31,
2007. No repurchases were made during the year ended
December 31, 2008.
58
Table of Contents
For the Years Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
(dollars in millions):
Effective October 1, 2006, we deconsolidated AMB
Institutional Alliance Fund III, L.P., on a prospective
basis, due to the re-evaluation of the accounting for our
investment in the fund because of changes to the partnership
agreement regarding the general partners rights effective
October 1, 2006. As a result, our results of operations
presented below are not comparable between years presented.
U.S. industrial same store rental revenues decreased
$26.0 million from the prior year due primarily to the
deconsolidation of AMB Institutional Alliance Fund III,
L.P., on October 1, 2006. Same store rental revenues for
the year ended December 31, 2006 would have been
$542.1 million if AMB Institutional Alliance Fund III,
L.P. had been deconsolidated as of January 1, 2006. The
increase of $27.4 million, excluding the deconsolidation of
AMB Institutional Alliance Fund III, L.P., is primarily due
to increased occupancy, rent increases on renewals and rollovers
as well as decreases in free rent. The 2007 acquisitions
consisted of seven properties, aggregating approximately
0.7 million square feet. The increase in rental revenues
from development was primarily due to increased occupancy at
several of our development projects where development activities
have been substantially completed as well as an increase in the
number of development projects. Other industrial revenues
include rental revenues from properties that have been
contributed to an unconsolidated co-investment venture, and
accordingly are not classified as discontinued operations in our
consolidated financial statements, and development projects that
have reached certain levels of operation and are not yet part of
the same store operating pool of properties. The increase in
other industrial revenues was primarily due to an increase in
base rents. The decrease in revenues from
non-U.S. industrial
properties was primarily due to the contribution of
4.2 million square feet of operating properties and
approximately 1.8 million square feet of completed
development projects into AMB Europe Fund I, FCP-FIS. The
decrease in private capital income of $14.4 million was
primarily due to a decrease in incentive fees, acquisition fees,
and disposition fees offset by an increase in asset management
fees as a result of an increase in total assets under management.
Table of Contents
Same store properties operating expenses increased
$4.0 million from the prior year, despite a decrease of
approximately $12.7 million due to the deconsolidation of
AMB Institutional Alliance Fund III, L.P., on
October 1, 2006. Same store operating expenses for the year
ended December 31, 2006 would have been $145.7 million
if AMB Institutional Alliance Fund III, L.P. had been
deconsolidated as of January 1, 2006. The increase of
approximately $16.7 million, had AMB Institutional Alliance
Fund III, L.P. been deconsolidated as of January 1,
2006, was primarily due to increased insurance costs, real
estate taxes, roads and grounds expense, and management fees.
The 2007 acquisitions consisted of seven properties, aggregating
approximately 0.7 million square feet. The increase in
development operating costs was primarily due to increased
operations in certain development projects which have been
substantially completed. This increase was primarily due to
increases in real estate taxes and utilities. The increase in
other industrial property operating costs was primarily due to
insurance, cleaning and non-reimbursable expenses. The decrease
in property operating costs from
non-U.S. industrial
properties is primarily due to the contribution of
4.2 million square feet of operating properties and
approximately 1.8 million square feet of completed
development projects into AMB Europe Fund I, FCP-FIS. The
decrease in depreciation and amortization expense was due to the
deconsolidation of AMB Institutional Alliance Fund III,
L.P. The increase in general and administrative expenses was
primarily due to additional staffing and the opening of new
offices both domestically and internationally. The decrease of
fund costs from the prior year was due primarily to the
deconsolidation of AMB Institutional Alliance Fund III,
L.P. The impairment losses during the year ended
December 31, 2007 were taken on non-core assets as a result
of leasing activities and changes in the economic environment.
The impairment losses during the year ended December 31,
2006 were taken on several non-core assets as a result of
leasing activities and changes in the economic environment and
the holding period of certain assets. Other expenses increased
approximately $2.5 million from the prior year due
primarily to an increase in dead deal expenditures.
60
Table of Contents
Development profits, net of taxes, represent gains from the sale
or contribution of development projects including land. See the
development sales and development contributions tables and
Property Divestitures in Capital
Resources for a discussion of the development asset sales
and contributions and the associated development profits during
the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006. During the year
ended December 31, 2007, we contributed 4.2 million
square feet in operating properties into AMB Europe Fund I,
FCP-FIS, contributed a 0.2 million square foot operating
property into AMB Institutional Alliance Fund III, L.P.,
and contributed an operating property aggregating approximately
0.1 million square feet into AMB-SGP Mexico, LLC, for a
total of approximately $524.9 million. As a result of these
contributions, we recognized gains from contribution of real
estate interests of approximately $73.4 million,
representing the portion of our interest in the contributed
properties acquired by the third-party investors for cash. The
decrease in equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures
of approximately $15.8 million was primarily due to a
decrease in gains from the sale of real estate interests by our
unconsolidated joint ventures partially offset by the
deconsolidation of AMB Institutional Alliance Fund III,
L.P. Other income increased approximately $10.4 million
from the prior year due primarily to an increase in the gain on
currency remeasurement of approximately $3.9 million, an
increase in insurance proceeds of approximately
$2.9 million related to losses from Hurricanes Katrina and
Wilma and an increase in interest income of $2.3 million.
The decrease in interest expense, including amortization, was
due primarily to decreased borrowings on unsecured credit
facilities and the deconsolidation of AMB Institutional Alliance
Fund III, L.P.
During 2007, we divested ourselves of three industrial
properties, aggregating approximately 0.3 million square
feet for $120.0 million, with a resulting gain of
approximately $2.0 million, and two value-added conversion
projects resulting in a gain of approximately
$60.0 million. During 2006, we divested ourselves of 17
industrial properties, aggregating approximately
3.5 million square feet, for an aggregate price of
approximately $175.3 million, with a resulting net gain of
approximately $42.6 million.
61
Table of Contents
In August 2006, we issued 2,000,000 shares of 6.85%
Series P Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock. The
increase in preferred stock dividends is due to the then newly
issued shares. On April 17, 2007, the operating partnership
redeemed all 800,000 of its outstanding 7.95% Series J
Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Limited Partnership Units and
all 800,000 of its outstanding 7.95% Series K Cumulative
Redeemable Preferred Limited Partnership Units. In addition, on
April 17, 2007, AMB Property II, L.P., one of our
subsidiaries, repurchased all 510,000 of its outstanding 8.00%
Series I Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Limited
Partnership Units. As a result of the redemptions and
repurchase, we recognized a reduction of income available to
common stockholders of $2.9 million for the original
issuance costs during the year ended December 31, 2007.
During the year ended December 31, 2006, AMB Property II,
L.P., one of our subsidiaries, repurchased all 840,000 of its
outstanding 8.125% Series H Cumulative Redeemable Preferred
Limited Partnership Units, all 220,440 of its outstanding 7.75%
Series E Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Limited
Partnership Units, all 201,139 of its outstanding 7.95%
Series F Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Limited
Partnership Units and all 729,582 of its outstanding 5.00%
Series N Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Limited
Partnership Units. As a result, we recognized a decrease in
income available to common stockholders of $1.1 million for
the original issuance costs, net of discount on repurchase.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Balance Sheet Strategy. In general, we use
unsecured lines of credit, unsecured notes, preferred stock and
common equity (issued by us
and/or the
operating partnership and its subsidiaries) to capitalize our
wholly-owned assets. Over time, we plan to retire non-recourse,
secured debt encumbering our wholly-owned assets and replace
that debt with unsecured notes where practicable. In managing
the co-investment ventures, in general, we use non-recourse,
secured debt to capitalize our co-investment ventures.
We currently expect that our principal sources of working
capital and funding for debt service, development, acquisitions,
expansion and renovation of properties will include:
We currently expect that our principal funding requirements will
include:
Table of Contents
To maintain our qualification as a real estate investment trust,
we must pay dividends to our stockholders aggregating annually
at least 90% of our taxable income. While historically we have
satisfied this distribution requirement by making cash
distributions to our stockholders, we may choose to satisfy this
requirement by making distributions of cash or other property,
including, in limited circumstances, our own stock. As a result
of this distribution requirement, we cannot rely on retained
earnings to fund our on-going operations to the same extent that
other corporations that are not real estate investment trusts
can. We may need to continue to raise capital in both the debt
and equity markets to fund our working capital needs,
acquisitions and developments.
If the long-term debt ratings of the operating partnership fall
below its current levels, the borrowing cost of debt under our
unsecured credit facilities and certain term loans will
increase. In addition, if the long-term debt ratings of the
operating partnership fall below investment grade, we may be
unable to request borrowings in currencies other than
U.S. dollars or Japanese Yen, as applicable, however, the
lack of other currency borrowings does not affect our ability to
fully draw down under the credit facilities or term loans. In
the event the long-term debt ratings of the operating
partnership fall below investment grade, we may be unable to
exercise our options to extend the term of our credit facilities
or our $230 million secured term loan credit agreement.
However, our lenders will not be able to terminate our credit
facilities or certain term loans in the event that the operating
partnerships credit rating falls below investment grade
status. None of our credit facilities or such term loans
contains covenants regarding our stock price or market
capitalization, thus a decrease in our stock price is not
expected to impact our ability to borrow under our existing
lines of credit and term loans. Based on publicly available
information regarding our lenders, we currently do not expect to
lose borrowing capacity under our existing lines of credit and
term loans as a result of a consolidation, merger or other
business combination among our lenders. However, our access to
funds under our credit facilities is dependent on the ability of
the lenders that are parties to such facilities to meet their
funding commitments to us. We continue to closely monitor global
economic conditions and the lenders who are parties to our
credit facilities, as well as our long-term debt and credit
ratings and outlooks, our customers financial positions,
private capital raising and capital market activity.
Should we face a situation in which we do not have sufficient
cash available to us through our operations to continue
operating our business as usual, we may need to find alternative
ways to increase our liquidity. Such alternatives may include,
without limitation, divesting ourselves of properties, whether
or not the sales price is optimal or if they otherwise meet our
strategic objectives to keep for the long term; issuing and
selling our debt and equity in public or private transactions
whether or not at favorable pricing or on favorable terms;
entering into leases with our customers at lower rental rates or
entering into lease renewals with our existing customers without
an increase in rental rates at turnover or, in either case, on
suboptimal terms.
Cash Flows. As of December 31, 2008, cash
provided by operating activities was $301.0 million as
compared to $240.5 million for the same period in 2007.
This change was primarily due to an increase in impairment
losses, a decrease in income from operations, development
profits and gains from sales and contributions of real estate
interests, net, and changes in our accounts receivable and other
assets and accounts payable and other liabilities. Cash used in
investing activities was $888.2 million for the year ended
December 31, 2008, as compared to cash used in investing
activities of $632.2 million for the same period in 2007.
This increase was primarily due to an increase in cash paid for
property acquisitions, a decrease in net proceeds from
divestiture of real estate and securities, an increase in loans
made to affiliates and the purchase of additional equity
interest in G. Accion, offset by an increase in repayment of
mortgage and loan receivables and a decrease in additions to
land, buildings, development costs, building improvements and
lease costs. Cash provided by financing activities was
$581.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2008,
as compared to cash provided by financing activities of
$420.0 million for the same period in 2007. This increase
was due primarily to an increase in borrowings on other debt,
net of payments, an increase in proceeds from issuances of
senior debt, net of payments, an increase in borrowings on
unsecured credit facilities, net of payments, a decrease in the
repurchase of preferred units and a decrease in distributions to
minority interests. This activity was partially offset by a
decrease in the issuance of common stock.
Subject to the above discussion, we believe our sources of
working capital, specifically our cash flow from operations, and
borrowings available under our unsecured credit facilities, are
adequate for us to meet our current liquidity requirements.
However, there can be no assurance that our sources of capital
will continue to be available at all or in amounts sufficient to
meet our needs. The unavailability of capital could adversely
affect our financial
Table of Contents
condition, results of operations, cash flow and ability to pay
cash dividends to our stockholders, and the market price of our
stock.
Capital
Resources
Development Completions. Development
completions are generally defined as properties that are
substantially complete and 90% occupied or pre-leased, or that
have been substantially complete for at least 12 months.
Development completions during the years ended December 31,
2008 and 2007 were as follows (dollars in thousands):
Development sales to third parties during the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 were as follows (dollars
in thousands):
Table of Contents
Development contribution activity during the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 was as follows (dollars in
thousands):
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||