Abercrombie & Fitch Company (ANF)

 

 

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

FORM 10-Q

þ		QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission File Number 1-12107

ABERCROMBIE & FITCH CO.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware		31-1469076
(State or other jurisdiction of		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
incorporation or organization)

6301 Fitch Path, New Albany, Ohio 43054

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (614) 283-6500

Not Applicable

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. þ Yes o No

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit and post such files).) þ Yes o No

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer þ		Accelerated filer o		Non-accelerated filer o		Smaller reporting company o
				(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). o Yes þ No

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Class A Common Stock		Outstanding at December 2, 2011
$.01 Par Value		85,960,568 Shares

 

 

ABERCROMBIE & FITCH CO.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Page No.
Part I. Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income Thirteen and Thirty-Nine Weeks Ended October 29, 2011 and October 30, 2010			3
Consolidated Balance Sheets October 29, 2011 and January 29, 2011			4
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows Thirty-Nine Weeks Ended October 29, 2011 and October 30, 2010			5
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements			6
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm			24
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations			25
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk			44
Item 4. Controls and Procedures			46
Part II. Other Information
Item 1. Legal Proceedings			47
Item 1A. Risk Factors			48
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds			49
Item 6. Exhibits			50
Exhibit 3.2
Exhibit 15
Exhibit 31.1
Exhibit 31.2
Exhibit 32
EX-101 INSTANCE DOCUMENT
EX-101 SCHEMA DOCUMENT
EX-101 CALCULATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT
EX-101 LABELS LINKBASE DOCUMENT
EX-101 PRESENTATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT
EX-101 DEFINITION LINKBASE DOCUMENT

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1.		FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ABERCROMBIE & FITCH CO.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(Thousands, except share and per share amounts)

(Unaudited)

		Thirteen Weeks Ended								Thirty-Nine Weeks Ended
		October 29, 2011				October 30, 2010				October 29, 2011				October 30, 2010
NET SALES		$	1,075,856			$	885,778			$	2,829,292			$	2,319,381
Cost of Goods Sold			429,334				321,346				1,056,067				838,186
GROSS PROFIT			646,522				564,432				1,773,225				1,481,195
Stores and Distribution Expense			461,683				385,135				1,286,108				1,104,027
Marketing, General and Administrative Expense			107,844				102,612				325,493				294,450
Other Operating Income, Net			(2,855	)			(1,692	)			(4,146	)			(4,507	)
OPERATING INCOME			79,850				78,377				165,770				87,225
Interest Expense, Net			533				671				2,469				2,303
INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE TAXES			79,317				77,706				163,301				84,922
Tax Expense from Continuing Operations			28,412				27,666				56,019				27,232
NET INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS		$	50,905			$	50,040			$	107,282			$	57,690
INCOME FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS, Net of Tax		$	—			$	—			$	796			$	—
NET INCOME		$	50,905			$	50,040			$	108,078			$	57,690
NET INCOME PER SHARE FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS:
BASIC		$	0.59			$	0.57			$	1.23			$	0.65
DILUTED		$	0.57			$	0.56			$	1.19			$	0.64
NET INCOME PER SHARE FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS:
BASIC		$	—			$	—			$	0.01			$	—
DILUTED		$	—			$	—			$	0.01			$	—
NET INCOME PER SHARE:
BASIC		$	0.59			$	0.57			$	1.24			$	0.65
DILUTED		$	0.57			$	0.56			$	1.20			$	0.64
WEIGHTED-AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING:
BASIC			86,962				88,236				87,170				88,184
DILUTED			89,707				90,069				90,167				89,731
DIVIDENDS DECLARED PER SHARE		$	0.175			$	0.175			$	0.525			$	0.525
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments		$	(6,012	)		$	8,866			$	10,492			$	6,631
Gain (Loss) on Marketable Securities, net of taxes of $513 and $543 for the thirteen-week periods ended October 29, 2011 and October 30, 2010, respectively, and $(444) and $(1,422) for the thirty-nine week periods ended October 29, 2011 and October 30, 2010, respectively			(873	)			(925	)			757				2,421
Unrealized gain (loss) on derivative financial instruments, net of taxes of $(589) and $1,170 for the thirteen-week periods ended October 29, 2011 and October 30, 2010, respectively and $(326) and $846 for the thirty-nine week periods ended October 29, 2011 and October 30, 2010			2,914				(1,991	)			2,467				(1,438	)
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)		$	(3,971	)		$	5,950			$	13,716			$	7,614
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME		$	46,934			$	55,990			$	121,794			$	65,304

The accompanying Notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

ABERCROMBIE & FITCH CO.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Thousands, except par value amounts)

(Unaudited)

		October 29, 2011				January 29, 2011
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash and Equivalents		$	488,341			$	826,353
Receivables			89,622				81,264
Inventories			679,341				385,857
Deferred Income Taxes			55,059				60,405
Other Current Assets			86,518				79,389
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS			1,398,881				1,433,268
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET			1,237,430				1,144,940
NON-CURRENT MARKETABLE SECURITIES			100,334				100,534
OTHER ASSETS			344,876				269,160
TOTAL ASSETS		$	3,081,521			$	2,947,902
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Accounts Payable		$	281,775			$	137,235
Accrued Expenses			311,693				306,587
Deferred Lease Credits			43,181				41,538
Income Taxes Payable			43,301				73,491
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES			679,950				558,851
LONG-TERM LIABILITIES:
Deferred Income Taxes			34,833				33,515
Deferred Lease Credits			192,130				192,619
Long-Term Debt			26,321				68,566
Other Liabilities			217,057				203,567
TOTAL LONG-TERM LIABILITIES			470,341				498,267
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY:
Class A Common Stock — $0.01 par value: 150,000 shares authorized and 103,300 shares issued at each of October 29, 2011 and January 29, 2011			1,033				1,033
Paid-In Capital			357,593				349,258
Retained Earnings			2,325,452				2,272,317
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), net of tax			7,200				(6,516	)
Treasury Stock, at Average Cost - 16,142 and 16,054 shares at October 29, 2011 and January 29, 2011, respectively			(760,048	)			(725,308	)
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY			1,931,230				1,890,784
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY		$	3,081,521			$	2,947,902

The accompanying Notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

ABERCROMBIE & FITCH CO.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Thousands)

(Unaudited)

		Thirty-Nine Weeks Ended
		October 29, 2011				October 30, 2010
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net Income		$	108,078			$	57,690
Impact of Other Operating Activities on Cash Flows:
Lessor Construction Allowances			30,976				26,769
Depreciation and Amortization			173,569				167,756
Loss on Disposal / Write-off of Assets			5,128				2,702
Amortization of Deferred Lease Credits			(33,019	)			(34,744	)
Share-Based Compensation			38,089				30,136
Tax Benefit (Deficiency) from Share-Based Compensation			3,031				(1,770	)
Deferred Taxes			6,623				(23,135	)
Non-Cash Charge for Asset Impairment			—				2,247
Changes in Assets and Liabilities:
Inventories			(292,839	)			(200,362	)
Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses			102,741				28,877
Income Taxes			(30,209	)			47,731
Other Assets and Liabilities			(47,712	)			(51,375	)
NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES			64,457				52,522
INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Capital Expenditures			(227,574	)			(116,965	)
Purchase of Trust-Owned Life Insurance Policies			—				(11,583	)
Proceeds from Sales of Marketable Securities			1,700				64,917
Other Investing			(22,267	)			—
NET CASH USED FOR INVESTING ACTIVITIES			(248,141	)			(63,631	)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from Share-Based Compensation			33,779				5,985
Purchase of Treasury Stock			(98,703	)			(29,207	)
Repayments of Borrowings Under the Credit Agreement			(45,002	)			—
Change in Outstanding Checks and Other			(1,083	)			(7,356	)
Dividends Paid			(45,847	)			(46,285	)
NET CASH USED FOR FINANCING ACTIVITIES			(156,856	)			(76,863	)
EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATES ON CASH			2,528				1,150
NET DECREASE IN CASH AND EQUIVALENTS:			(338,012	)			(86,822	)
Cash and Equivalents, Beginning of Period			826,353				680,113
CASH AND EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD		$	488,341				593,291
SIGNIFICANT NON-CASH INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Change in Accrual for Construction in Progress		$	31,593				17,479

The accompanying Notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

ABERCROMBIE & FITCH CO.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION

Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (“A&F”), through its wholly-owned subsidiaries (collectively, A&F and its wholly-owned subsidiaries are referred to as the “Company”), is a specialty retailer of high-quality, casual apparel for men, women and kids with an active, youthful lifestyle.

The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements include the historical financial statements of, and transactions applicable to, the Company and reflect its assets, liabilities, results of operations and cash flows.

The Company’s fiscal year ends on the Saturday closest to January 31. Fiscal years are designated in the consolidated financial statements and notes by the calendar year in which the fiscal year commences. All references herein to “Fiscal 2011” represent the 52-week fiscal year that will end on January 28, 2012, and to “Fiscal 2010” represent the 52-week fiscal year that ended January 29, 2011.

The Consolidated Financial Statements as of October 29, 2011 and for the thirteen and thirty-nine week periods ended October 29, 2011 and October 30, 2010 are unaudited and are presented pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Accordingly, these Consolidated Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto contained in A&F’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for Fiscal 2010 filed on March 29, 2011. The January 29, 2011 consolidated balance sheet data were derived from audited consolidated financial statements, but do not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”).

In the opinion of management, the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements reflect all adjustments (which are of a normal recurring nature) necessary to present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position and results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods, but are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations to be anticipated for Fiscal 2011.

Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.

The Consolidated Financial Statements as of October 29, 2011 and for the thirteen and thirty-nine week periods ended October 29, 2011 and October 30, 2010 included herein have been reviewed by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, and the report of such firm follows the notes to the consolidated financial statements.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP is not subject to the liability provisions of Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Act”) for their report on the consolidated financial statements because their report is not a “report” or a “part” of a registration statement prepared or certified by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.

2. SEGMENT REPORTING

The Company determines its operating segments on the same basis that it uses to evaluate performance internally. Operating segments have been aggregated and are reported as one reportable segment because they have similar economic characteristics and meet the required aggregation criteria. The Company believes its operating segments may be aggregated for financial reporting purposes because they are similar in each of the following areas: class of consumer, economic characteristics, nature of products, nature of production processes, and distribution methods.

Geographic Information

Financial information relating to the Company’s operations by geographic area is as follows:

Net Sales:

Net sales includes net merchandise sales through stores and direct-to-consumer operations, including shipping and handling revenue. Net sales are reported by geographic area based on the location of the customer.

		Thirteen Weeks Ended								Thirty-Nine Weeks Ended
(in thousands):		October 29, 2011				October 30, 2010				October 29, 2011				October 30, 2010
United States		$	820,188			$	721,950			$	2,146,029			$	1,903,329
Europe			193,566				110,044				528,429				278,142
Other			62,102				53,785				154,833				137,910
Total		$	1,075,856			$	885,778			$	2,829,292			$	2,319,381

Long-Lived Assets:

(in thousands):		October 29, 2011				January 29, 2011
United States		$	883,731			$	959,777
Europe			335,652				169,313
Other			163,324				127,741
Total		$	1,382,707			$	1,256,831

Long-lived assets in the table above include primarily property and equipment (net), store supplies and lease deposits.

3. SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION

Financial Statement Impact

The Company recognized share-based compensation expense of $13.7 million and $38.1 million for the thirteen and thirty-nine week periods ended October 29, 2011, respectively, and $10.2 million and $30.1 million for the thirteen and thirty-nine week periods ended October 30, 2010, respectively. The Company also recognized $5.1 million and $14.3 million in tax benefits related to share-based compensation expense for the thirteen and thirty-nine week periods ended October 29, 2011, respectively, and $3.7 million and $10.8 million for the thirteen and thirty-nine week periods ended October 30, 2010, respectively.

The fair value of share-based compensation awards is recognized as compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the awards’ requisite service period, net of forfeitures. For awards that are expected to result in a tax deduction, a deferred tax asset is recorded in the period in which share-based compensation expense is recognized. A current tax deduction arises upon the vesting of restricted stock units or the exercise of stock options and stock appreciation rights and is principally measured at the award’s intrinsic value. If the tax deduction is greater than the recorded deferred tax asset, the tax benefit associated with any excess deduction is considered a “windfall tax benefit” and is recognized as additional paid-in capital. If the tax deduction is less than the recorded deferred tax asset, the resulting difference, or shortfall, is first charged to additional paid-in capital, to the extent of the pool of “windfall tax benefits,” with any remainder recognized as tax expense. The amount of the Company’s pool of “windfall tax benefits” was approximately $83.9 million as of October 29, 2011, which is sufficient to fully absorb any shortfall which may develop associated with awards currently outstanding.

The Company adjusts share-based compensation expense on a quarterly basis for actual forfeitures and for changes to the estimate of expected award forfeitures. The effect of adjusting the forfeiture rate is recognized in the period the forfeiture estimate is changed. The effect of adjustments for forfeitures during the thirty-nine weeks ended October 29, 2011 was an expense of $1.3 million. The effect of adjustments for forfeitures during the thirty-nine weeks ended October 30, 2010 was income of $4.1 million.

Pursuant to an employment agreement, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) is eligible to receive “semi-annual grants,” as defined in the agreement. The semi-annual grants vest in equal annual installments over the four-year period following the grant date with the condition that each award becomes fully vested no later than February 1, 2014, except for the final semi-annual grant, which will become fully vested on the date of the grant.

A&F issues shares of Common Stock from treasury stock upon exercise of stock options and stock appreciation rights and vesting of restricted stock units. As of October 29, 2011, A&F had sufficient treasury stock available to settle stock options, stock appreciation rights and restricted stock units outstanding. Settlement of stock awards in Common Stock also requires that the Company has sufficient shares available in stockholder-approved plans at the applicable time.

In the event, at any reporting date during which share-based compensation awards remain outstanding, there are not sufficient shares of Common Stock available to be issued under the 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “2005 LTIP”) and the Amended and Restated 2007 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “Amended and Restated 2007 LTIP”), or under a successor or replacement plan, the Company may be required to designate some portion of the outstanding awards to be settled in cash, which would result in liability classification of such awards.

Plans

As of October 29, 2011, A&F had two primary share-based compensation plans: the 2005 LTIP, under which A&F grants stock options, stock appreciation rights and restricted stock units to associates of the Company and non-associate members of the A&F Board of Directors, and the Amended and Restated 2007 LTIP, under which A&F grants stock options, stock appreciation rights and restricted stock units to associates of the Company. A&F also has four other share-based compensation plans under which it granted stock options and restricted stock units to associates of the Company and non-associate members of the A&F Board of Directors in prior years.

The Amended and Restated 2007 LTIP, a stockholder-approved plan, permits A&F to annually grant awards covering up to 2.0 million of underlying shares of A&F’s Common Stock for each type of award, per eligible participant, plus any unused annual limit from prior years. The 2005 LTIP, a stockholder-approved plan, permits A&F to annually grant awards covering up to 250,000 of underlying shares of A&F’s Common Stock for each award type to any associate of the Company (other than the CEO) who is subject to Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, at the time of the grant, plus any unused annual limit from prior years. In addition, any non-associate director of A&F is eligible to receive awards under the 2005 LTIP. Under both plans, stock options, stock appreciation rights and restricted stock units vest primarily over four years for associates. Under the 2005 LTIP, restricted stock units typically vest after approximately one year for non-associate directors of A&F. Awards granted to the CEO have a vesting period defined as the shorter of four years or the award date through the end of the employment agreement. Under both plans, stock options have a ten-year term and stock appreciation rights have up to a ten-year term, subject to forfeiture under the terms of the plans. The plans provide for accelerated vesting if there is a change of control as defined in the plans.

Fair Value Estimates

The Company estimates the fair value of stock options and stock appreciation rights using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, which requires the Company to estimate the expected term of the stock options and stock appreciation rights and expected future stock price volatility over the expected term. Estimates of expected terms, which represent the expected periods of time the Company believes stock options and stock appreciation rights will be outstanding, are based on historical experience. Estimates of expected future stock price volatility are based on the volatility of A&F’s Common Stock price for the most recent historical period equal to the expected term of the stock option or stock appreciation right, as appropriate. The Company calculates the volatility as the annualized standard deviation of the differences in the natural logarithms of the weekly stock closing price, adjusted for stock splits and dividends.

In the case of restricted stock units, the Company calculates the fair value of the restricted stock units granted using the market price of the underlying Common Stock on the date of grant adjusted for anticipated dividend payments during the vesting period.

Stock Options

The Company did not grant any stock options during the thirty-nine weeks ended October 29, 2011 or October 30, 2010.

Below is a summary of stock option activity for the thirty-nine weeks ended October 29, 2011:

		Number of				Weighted-								Weighted-Average
		Underlying				Average				Aggregate				Remaining
Stock Options		Shares				Exercise Price				Intrinsic Value				Contractual Life
Outstanding at January 29, 2011			2,316,648			$	39.51
Granted			—				—
Exercised			(1,094,103	)			30.94
Forfeited or cancelled			(27,100	)			52.71
Outstanding at October 29, 2011			1,195,445			$	47.06			$	36,048,435				3.1
Stock options exercisable at October 29, 2011			1,102,395			$	46.10			$	34,241,480				2.8
Stock options expected to become exercisable in the future as of October 29, 2011			90,358			$	58.54			$	1,746,708				6.6

The total intrinsic value of stock options which were exercised during the thirty-nine weeks ended October 29, 2011 was $38.6 million. The total intrinsic value of stock options exercised during the thirty-nine weeks ended October 30, 2010 was $2.7 million.

The grant date fair value of stock options which vested during the thirty-nine weeks ended October 29, 2011 and October 30, 2010 was $2.3 million and $3.8 million, respectively.

As of October 29, 2011, there was $0.6 million of total unrecognized compensation cost, net of estimated forfeitures, related to stock options. The unrecognized compensation cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 0.3 years.

Stock Appreciation Rights

The weighted-average estimated fair value of stock appreciation rights granted during the thirty-nine weeks ended October 29, 2011 and October 30, 2010, and the weighted-average assumptions used in calculating such fair value, on the date of grant, were as follows:

		Thirty-Nine Weeks Ended
		Chairman and Chief Executive
		Officer								Other Executive Officers								All Other Associates
		October 29,				October 30,				October 29,				October 30,				October 29,				October 30,
		2011				2010				2011				2010				2011				2010
Grant date market price		$	56.86			$	44.86			$	54.87			$	44.86			$	54.93			$	44.28
Exercise price		$	56.86			$	44.86			$	54.87			$	44.86			$	54.93			$	44.28
Fair value		$	22.99			$	16.96			$	22.29			$	16.99			$	21.89			$	16.49
Assumptions:
Price volatility			53	%			50	%			53	%			51	%			55	%			53	%
Expected term (Years)			4.6				4.7				4.7				4.5				4.1				4.1
Risk-free interest rate			1.8	%			2.3	%			2.0	%			2.3	%			1.7	%			2.0	%
Dividend yield			1.5	%			2.1	%			1.6	%			2.1	%			1.6	%			2.1	%

Below is a summary of stock appreciation rights activity for the thirty-nine weeks ended October 29, 2011:

		Number of												Weighted-Average
		Underlying				Weighted-Average				Aggregate				Remaining
Stock Appreciation Rights		Shares				Exercise Price				Intrinsic Value				Contractual Life
Outstanding at January 29, 2011			7,136,189			$	34.08
Granted:
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer			1,879,195				56.86
Other Executive Officers			217,000				54.87
All Other Associates			156,700				54.93
Exercised			(287,600	)			32.99
Forfeited or cancelled			(54,375	)			41.14
Outstanding at October 29, 2011			9,047,109			$	39.66			$	336,075,490				5.4
Stock appreciation rights exercisable at October 29, 2011			853,157			$	36.84			$	34,103,192				5.5
Stock appreciation rights expected to become exercisable in the future as of October 29, 2011			8,090,112			$	39.89			$	298,673,670				5.3

The total intrinsic value of stock appreciation rights exercised during the thirty-nine weeks ended October 29, 2011 was $11.0 million. The total intrinsic value of stock appreciation rights exercised during the thirty-nine weeks ended October 30, 2010 was immaterial.

The grant date fair value of stock appreciation rights which vested during the thirty-nine weeks ended October 29, 2011 and October 30, 2010 was $11.2 million and $5.0 million, respectively.

As of October 29, 2011, there was $73.7 million of total unrecognized compensation cost, net of estimated forfeitures, related to stock appreciation rights. The unrecognized compensation cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.1 years.

Restricted Stock Units

Below is a summary of restricted stock unit activity for the thirty-nine weeks ended October 29, 2011:

		Number of Underlying				Weighted-Average Grant
Restricted Stock Units		Shares				Date Fair Value
Non-vested at January 29, 2011			1,147,754			$	49.59
Granted			558,450				54.38
Vested			(393,728	)			59.59
Forfeited			(94,848	)			43.26
Non-vested at October 29, 2011			1,217,628			$	49.01

The total fair value of restricted stock units granted during the thirty-nine weeks ended October 29, 2011 and October 30, 2010 was $30.4 million and $17.5 million, respectively.

The total grant date fair value of restricted stock units and restricted shares which vested during the thirty-nine weeks ended October 29, 2011 and October 30, 2010 was $23.5 million.

As of October 29, 2011, there was $39.8 million of total unrecognized compensation cost, net of estimated forfeitures, related to non-vested restricted stock units. The unrecognized compensation cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.1 years.

4. NET INCOME PER SHARE

Net income per basic share is computed based on the weighted-average number of outstanding shares of Common Stock. Net income per diluted share includes the weighted-average dilutive effect of stock options, stock appreciation rights and restricted stock units outstanding.

Weighted-Average Shares Outstanding and Anti-Dilutive Shares (in thousands):

		Thirteen Weeks Ended								Thirty-Nine Weeks Ended
		October 29, 2011				October 30, 2010				October 29, 2011				October 30, 2010
Shares of Common Stock issued			103,300				103,300				103,300				103,300
Treasury shares			(16,338	)			(15,064	)			(16,130	)			(15,116	)
Weighted-Average — Basic Shares			86,962				88,236				87,170				88,184
Dilutive effect of stock options, stock appreciation rights and restricted stock units			2,745				1,833				2,997				1,547
Weighted-Average — Diluted Shares			89,707				90,069				90,167				89,731
Anti-Dilutive Shares			2,403	(1)			5,271	(1)			2,137	(1)			5,098	(1)

5. CASH AND EQUIVALENTS

Cash and equivalents consisted of (in thousands):

		October 29, 2011				January 29, 2011
Cash and equivalents:
Cash		$	317,603			$	300,624
Cash equivalents			170,738				525,729
Total cash and equivalents		$	488,341			$	826,353

Cash and equivalents include amounts on deposit with financial institutions, United States treasury bills, and other investments, primarily held in money market accounts, with original maturities of less than three months. Any cash that is legally restricted from use is recorded in Other Assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The restricted cash balance was $31.7 million on October 29, 2011 and $26.3 million on January 29, 2011. Restricted cash includes various cash deposits with international banks that are used as collateralization for customary non-debt banking commitments and deposits into trust accounts to conform with standard insurance security requirements.

6. INVESTMENTS

Investments consisted of (in thousands):

		October 29, 2011				January 29, 2011
Marketable securities — Non-Current:
Available-for-sale securities:
Auction rate securities — student loan backed		$	84,897			$	85,732
Auction rate securities — municipal authority bonds			15,437				14,802
Total available-for-sale securities			100,334				100,534
Rabbi Trust assets: (1)
Money market funds			774				343
Municipal notes and bonds			11,572				11,870
Trust-owned life insurance policies (at cash surrender value)			72,472				70,288
Total Rabbi Trust assets			84,818				82,501
Total Investments		$	185,152			$	183,035

At October 29, 2011, the Company’s investment grade auction rate securities (“ARS”) consisted of insured student loan backed securities and municipal authority bonds, with maturities ranging from 17 to 32 years. Each investment in student loans is insured by (1) the U.S. government under the Federal Family Education Loan Program, (2) a private insurer or (3) a combination of both. The percentage of insurance coverage of the outstanding principal and interest of the ARS varies by security.

The par and carrying values, and related cumulative temporary impairment charges for the Company’s available-for-sale marketable securities as of October 29, 2011 were as follows:

						Temporary				Carrying
(in thousands)		Par Value				Impairment				Value
Available-for-sale securities:
Auction rate securities — student loan backed		$	93,925			$	(9,028	)		$	84,897
Auction rate securities — municipal authority bonds			19,975				(4,538	)			15,437
Total available-for-sale securities		$	113,900			$	(13,566	)		$	100,334

See Note 7, “Fair Value,” for further discussion on the valuation of the ARS.

An impairment is considered to be other-than-temporary if an entity (i) intends to sell the security, (ii) more likely than not will be required to sell the security before recovering its amortized cost basis, or (iii) does not expect to recover the security’s entire amortized cost basis, even if there is no intent to sell the security. The Company has not incurred any credit-related losses on available-for-sale ARS and, furthermore, the issuers continued to perform under their respective obligations, including making scheduled interest payments, and the Company expects that this will continue going forward.

The irrevocable rabbi trust (the “Rabbi Trust”) is intended to be used as a source of funds to match respective funding obligations to participants in the Abercrombie & Fitch Co. Nonqualified Savings and Supplemental Retirement Plan I, the Abercrombie & Fitch Co. Nonqualified Savings and Supplemental Retirement Plan II and the Chief Executive Officer Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan. The Rabbi Trust assets are consolidated and recorded at fair value, with the exception of the trust-owned life insurance policies which are recorded at cash surrender value. The Rabbi Trust assets are included in Other Assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and are restricted as to their use as noted above. Net unrealized gains and losses related to the municipal notes and bonds held in the Rabbi Trust were not material for the thirteen and thirty-nine week periods ended October 29, 2011 and October 30, 2010. The change in cash surrender value of the trust-owned life insurance policies held in the Rabbi Trust resulted in a realized gain of $0.7 million for both the thirteen weeks ended October 29, 2011 and October 30, 2010 and realized gains of $2.2 million and $1.8 million for the thirty-nine weeks ended October 29, 2011 and October 30, 2010, respectively, recorded as part of Interest Expense, Net on the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income.

7. FAIR VALUE

Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The inputs used to measure fair value are prioritized based on a three-level hierarchy. The three levels of inputs to measure fair value are as follows:

•

Level 1 — inputs are unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities that are available in active markets.

•

Level 2 — inputs are other than quoted market prices included within Level 1 that are observable for assets or liabilities, directly or indirectly.

•

Level 3 — inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable.

The lowest level of significant input determines the placement of the entire fair value measurement in the hierarchy. The three levels of the hierarchy and the distribution of the Company’s assets and liabilities, measured at fair value, within it were as follows:

		Assets and Liabilities at Fair Value as of October 29, 2011
		(in thousands)
		Level 1				Level 2				Level 3				Total
ASSETS:
Money market funds(1)		$	171,513			$	—			$	—			$	171,513
ARS — available-for-sale — student loan backed			—				—				84,897				84,897
ARS — available-for-sale — municipal authority bonds			—				—				15,437				15,437
Municipal notes and bonds held in the Rabbi Trust			11,572				—				—				11,572
Derivative financial instruments			—				1,457				—				1,457
Total assets measured at fair value		$	183,085			$	1,457			$	100,334			$	284,876
LIABILITIES:
Derivative financial instruments			—				922				—				922
Total liabilities measured at fair value		$	—			$	922			$	—			$	922

The level 2 liabilities consist of derivative financial instruments, primarily forward foreign exchange contracts. The fair value of forward foreign exchange contracts is determined by using quoted market prices of the same or similar instruments, adjusted for counterparty risk.

The level 3 assets include investments in insured student loan backed ARS and insured municipal authority bond ARS which are available-for-sale.

The Company measures the fair value of its ARS primarily using a discounted cash flow model as well as a comparison to similar securities in the market. Certain significant inputs into the model are unobservable in the market including the periodic coupon rate, market rate of return and expected term.

As of October 29, 2011, approximately 47% of the Company’s ARS were “AAA” rated, approximately 20% were “AA” rated, and approximately 33% were “A-” rated, in each case as rated by one or more of the major credit rating agencies.

The table below includes a roll-forward of the Company’s level 3 assets and liabilities from January 29, 2011 to October 29, 2011. When a determination is made to classify an asset or liability within level 3, the determination is based upon the lack of significance of the observable parameters to the overall fair value measurement. However, the fair value determination for level 3 financial assets and liabilities may include observable components.

		Available-for-sale
		ARS - Student				Available-for-sale
(in thousands)		Loans				ARS - Muni Bonds				Total
Fair value, January 29, 2011		$	85,732			$	14,802			$	100,534
Redemptions			(1,700	)							(1,700	)
Gains and (losses), net:
Reported in Other Comprehensive Income			865				635				1,500
Fair value, October 29, 2011		$	84,897			$	15,437			$	100,334

8. INVENTORIES

Inventories are principally valued at the lower of average cost or market utilizing the retail method. The Company determines market value as the anticipated future selling price of the merchandise less a normal margin. An initial markup is applied to inventory at cost in order to establish a cost-to-retail ratio. Permanent markdowns, when taken, reduce both the retail and cost components of inventory on-hand so as to maintain the already established cost-to-retail relationship. At first and third fiscal quarter end, the Company reduces inventory value by recording a valuation reserve that represents the expected future markdowns on current season inventory. At second and fourth fiscal quarter end, the Company reduces inventory value by recording a valuation reserve that represents the expected future markdowns on any remaining carryover inventory from the season then ending. The valuation reserve was $38.1 million, $24.4 million and $34.3 million at October 29, 2011, January 29, 2011 and October 30, 2010, respectively.

Additionally, as part of inventory valuation, inventory shrinkage estimates based on historical trends from actual physical inventories are made that reduce the inventory value for lost or stolen items. The Company performs physical inventories on a periodic basis and adjusts the shrink reserve accordingly. The shrink reserve was $4.4 million, $7.6 million and $2.9 million at October 29, 2011, January 29, 2011 and October 30, 2010, respectively.

The inventory balance, net of the above mentioned reserves, was $679.3 million, $385.9 million and $511.8 million at October 29, 2011, January 29, 2011 and October 30, 2010, respectively.

9. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET

Property and equipment, net, consisted of (in thousands):

		October 29, 2011				January 29, 2011
Property and equipment, at cost		$	2,649,636			$	2,451,414
Accumulated depreciation and amortization			(1,412,206	)			(1,306,474	)
Property and equipment, net		$	1,237,430			$	1,144,940

Long-lived assets, primarily comprised of property and equipment, are reviewed periodically for impairment or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that full recoverability of net asset balances through future cash flows is in question. Factors used in the evaluation include, but are not limited to, management’s plans for future operations, recent operating results, and projected cash flows.

Store-related assets are considered level 3 assets in the fair value hierarchy and the fair values were determined at the store level, primarily using a discounted cash flow model. The estimation of future cash flows from operating activities requires significant estimates of factors that include future sales, gross margin performance and operating expenses. In instances where the discounted cash flow analysis indicated a negative value at the store level, the market exit price based on historical experience was used to determine the fair value by asset type. Included in property and equipment, net, are store-related assets previously impaired and measured at fair value of $10.7 million and $14.6 million, net of accumulated depreciation, as of October 29, 2011 and January 29, 2011, respectively.

10. DEFERRED LEASE CREDITS

Deferred lease credits are derived from payments received from landlords to wholly or partially offset store construction costs and are classified between current and long-term liabilities. The amounts, which are amortized over the respective lives of the related leases, consisted of the following (in thousands):

		October 29, 2011				January 29, 2011
Deferred lease credits		$	577,064			$	544,223
Amortized deferred lease credits			(341,753	)			(310,066	)
Total deferred lease credits, net		$	235,311			$	234,157

11. INCOME TAXES

The provision for income taxes is based on the current estimate of the annual effective tax rate adjusted to reflect the impact of items discrete to the thirteen weeks ended October 29, 2011. The effective tax rate from continuing operations for the thirteen weeks ended October 29, 2011 was 35.8% compared to 35.6% for the thirteen weeks ended October 30, 2010. The effective tax rate from continuing operations for the thirty-nine weeks ended October 29, 2011 was 34.3% compared to 32.1% for the thirty-nine weeks ended October 30, 2010.

Cash payments of income taxes made during the thirteen weeks ended October 29, 2011 and October 30, 2010 were approximately $6.2 million and $11.8 million, respectively. Cash payments of income taxes made during the thirty-nine weeks ended October 29, 2011 and October 30, 2010 were approximately $107.8 million and $29.7 million, respectively.

12. LONG-TERM DEBT

On July 28, 2011, the Company entered into an Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the “Amended and Restated Credit Agreement”) under which up to $350 million is available. This Amended and Restated Credit Agreement serves to amend and restate in its entirety the syndicated unsecured credit agreement dated April 15, 2008 as previously amended (the “Prior Credit Agreement”). The primary reasons for entering into this agreement are to extend the termination date from April 12, 2013 to July 27, 2016 and to reduce fees and interest rates. As stated in the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, the primary purposes of the agreement are for trade and stand-by letters of credit in the ordinary course of business, as well as to fund working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions and investments, and other general corporate purposes.

The facility fees payable under the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement are based on the Company’s Leverage Ratio (i.e., the ratio, on a consolidated basis, of (a) the sum of total debt (excluding trade letters of credit) plus 600% of forward minimum rent commitments to (b) consolidated earnings, as adjusted, before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization and rent (“Consolidated EBITDAR”) for the trailing four-consecutive-fiscal-quarter periods. The facility fees accrue at a rate of 0.125% to 0.30% per annum based on the Leverage Ratio for the most recent determination date. The Amended and Restated Credit Agreement requires that the Leverage Ratio not be greater than 3.75 to 1.00 at the end of each testing period. The Amended and Restated Credit Agreement also requires that the Coverage Ratio for A&F and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis of (i) Consolidated EBITDAR for the trailing four-consecutive-fiscal-quarter period to (ii) the sum of, without duplication, (x) net interest expense for such period, (y) scheduled payments of long-term debt due within twelve months of the date of determination and (z) the sum of minimum rent and contingent store rent, not be less than 2.00 to 1.00. The Company was in compliance with the applicable ratio requirements and other covenants at October 29, 2011. Interest rates on borrowings under the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement are generally based upon market rates plus a margin based on the Leverage Ratio.

The terms of the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement include customary events of default such as payment defaults, cross-defaults to other material indebtedness, undischarged material judgments, bankruptcy and insolvency, the occurrence of a defined change in control, or the failure to observe the negative covenants and other covenants related to the operation and conduct of the business of A&F and its subsidiaries. Upon an event of default, the lenders will not be obligated to make loans or other extensions of credit and may, among other things, terminate their commitments to the Company, and declare any then outstanding loans due and payable immediately.

The Amended and Restated Credit Agreement will mature on July 27, 2016. The Company had no trade letters of credit outstanding at October 29, 2011 and January 29, 2011. Stand-by letters of credit outstanding, under either the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement or Prior Credit Agreement as applicable, on October 29, 2011 and January 29, 2011 were immaterial.

As of October 29, 2011 the Company did not have any borrowing under the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement and had $43.8 million outstanding under the Prior Credit Agreement as of January 29, 2011. The amounts outstanding under the Prior Credit Agreement were denominated in Japanese Yen and were fully repaid during the thirty-nine weeks ended October 29, 2011.

As of October 29, 2011 and January 29, 2011, the Company also had $26.3 million and $24.8 million, respectively, of long-term debt related to the landlord financing obligation for certain leases where the Company is deemed the owner of the project for accounting purposes, as substantially all of the risk of ownership during construction of a leased property is held by the Company. The landlord financing obligation is amortized over the life of the related lease.

As of October 29, 2011, the carrying value of the Company’s long-term debt approximated fair value. Total interest expense was $1.8 million and $1.9 million for the thirteen weeks ended October 29, 2011 and October 30, 2010, respectively, and $6.2 million and $5.7 million for the thirty-nine weeks ended October 29, 2011 and October 30, 2010, respectively. There was no long-term debt recorded under the Amended & Restated Credit Agreement for the thirteen weeks ended October 29, 2011. The average interest rate for the long-term debt that has been previously outstanding under the Prior Credit Agreement was 2.4% for the thirty-nine weeks ended October 29, 2011.

13. DERIVATIVES

The Company is exposed to risks associated with changes in foreign currency exchange rates and uses derivatives, primarily forward contracts, to manage the financial impacts of these exposures. The Company does not use forward contracts to engage in currency speculation and does not enter into derivative financial instruments for trading purposes.

In order to qualify for hedge accounting treatment, a derivative must be considered highly effective at offsetting changes in either the hedged item’s cash flows or fair value. Additionally, the hedge relationship must be documented to include the risk management objective and strategy, the hedging instrument, the hedged item, the risk exposure, and how hedge effectiveness will be assessed prospectively and retrospectively. The extent to which a hedging instrument has been and is expected to continue to be effective at achieving offsetting changes in fair value or cash flows is assessed and documented at least quarterly. Any hedge ineffectiveness is reported in current period earnings and hedge accounting is discontinued if it is determined that the derivative is not highly effective.

For derivatives that either do not qualify for hedge accounting or are not designated as hedges, all changes in the fair value of the derivative are recognized in earnings. For qualifying cash flow hedges, the effective portion of the change in the fair value of the derivative is recorded as a component of Other Comprehensive Income (“OCI”) and recognized in earnings when the hedged cash flows affect earnings. The ineffective portion of the derivative gain or loss, as well as changes in the fair value of the derivative’s time value are recognized in current period earnings. The effectiveness of the hedge is assessed based on changes in the fair value attributable to changes in spot prices. The changes in the fair value of the derivative contract related to the changes in the difference between the spot price and the forward price are excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness and are also recognized in current period earnings. If the cash flow hedge relationship is terminated, the derivative gains or losses that are deferred in OCI will be recognized in earnings when the hedged cash flows occur. However, for cash flow hedges that are terminated because the forecasted transaction is not expected to occur in the original specified time period, or a two-month period thereafter, the derivative gains or losses are immediately recognized in earnings.

The Company uses derivative instruments, primarily forward contracts designated as cash flow hedges, to hedge the foreign currency exposure associated with forecasted foreign-currency-denominated intercompany inventory sales to foreign subsidiaries and the related settlement of the foreign-currency-denominated inter-company receivable. Fluctuations in exchange rates will either increase or decrease the Company’s U.S. dollar equivalent cash flows and affect the Company’s U.S. dollar earnings. Gains or losses on the foreign exchange forward contracts that are used to hedge these exposures are expected to partially offset this variability. Foreign exchange forward contracts represent agreements to exchange the currency of one country for the currency of another country at an agreed-upon settlement date. As of October 29, 2011, the maximum length of time over which forecasted foreign-currency-denominated inter-company inventory sales were hedged was twelve months. The sale of the inventory to the Company’s customers will result in the reclassification of related derivative gains and losses that are reported in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss). Substantially all of the remaining unrealized gains or losses related to foreign-currency-denominated inter-company inventory sales that have occurred as of October 29, 2011 will be recognized in costs of goods sold over the following two months at the values at the date the inventory was sold to the respective subsidiary.

The Company nets derivative assets and liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets to the extent that master netting arrangements meet the specific accounting requirements set forth by U.S. GAAP.

As of October 29, 2011, the Company had the following outstanding foreign exchange forward contracts that were entered to hedge either a portion or all of forecasted foreign-currency-denominated inter-company inventory sales, the resulting settlement of the foreign-currency-denominated inter-company accounts receivable, or both:

		Notional Amount(1)
Euro		$	53,699
British Pound		$	34,001
Canadian Dollar		$	14,853

The Company also uses foreign exchange forward contracts to hedge certain foreign currency denominated net monetary assets/liabilities. Examples of monetary assets/liabilities include cash balances, receivables, payables, and debt. Fluctuations in exchange rates result in transaction gains/(losses) being recorded in earnings as U.S. GAAP requires that monetary assets/liabilities be remeasured at the spot exchange rate at quarter-end or upon settlement. The Company has chosen not to apply hedge accounting to these instruments because there are no differences in the timing of gain or loss recognition on the hedging instrument and the hedged item.

As of October 29, 2011, the Company had the following outstanding currency forward contracts that were entered into to hedge foreign currency denominated net monetary assets/liabilities:

		Notional Amount(1)
Japanese Yen		$	16,921
Euro		$	9,584
British Pound		$	4,706

The location and amounts of derivative fair values on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of October 29, 2011 and January 29, 2011 were as follows:

		Balance Sheet		Asset Derivatives								Balance Sheet		Liability Derivatives
(in thousands)		Location		October 29, 2011				January 29, 2011				Location		October 29, 2011				January 29, 2011
Derivatives Designated as Hedging Instruments:
Foreign Exchange Forward Contracts		Other Current Assets		$	1,457			$	727			Other Liabilities		$	227			$	763
Derivates Not Designated as Hedging Instruments:
Foreign Exchange Forward Contracts		Other Current Assets		$	—			$	—			Other Liabilities		$	695			$	380
Total		Other Current Assets		$	1,457			$	727			Other Liabilities		$	922			$	1,143

Refer to Note 7, “Fair Value,” for further discussion of the determination of the fair value of derivatives.

The location and amounts of derivative gains and losses for the thirteen and thirty-nine weeks ended October 29, 2011 and October 30, 2010 on the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income were as follows:

				Thirteen Weeks Ended								Thirty-Nine Weeks Ended
				October 29,				October 30,				October 29,			October 30,
				2011				2010				2011			2010
(in thousands)		Location		Gain/(Loss)				Gain/(Loss)				Gain/(Loss)			Gain/(Loss)
Derivatives not designated as Hedging Instruments:
Foreign Exchange Forward Contracts		Other Operating Income, Net		$	(150	)		$	(801	)		$	(1,529)		$	(1,368	)

																				Location of
																				Gain (Loss)
																				Recognized in
										Location of										Earnings on
										Gain (Loss)										Derivative
										Reclassified										Contracts
										from										(Ineffective
										Accumulated										Portion and		Amount of Gain (Loss)
		Amount of Gain (Loss)								OCI into		Amount of Gain (Loss)								Amount		Recognized in Earnings on
		Recognized in OCI on								Earnings		Reclassified from								Excluded from		Derivative Contracts (Ineffective
		Derivative Contracts								(Effective		Accumulated OCI into								Effectiveness		Portion and Amount Excluded
		(Effective Portion)								Portion)		Earnings (Effective Portion)								Testing)		from Effectiveness Testing)
		(a)										(b)										(c)
		Thirteen Weeks Ended
		October 29,				October 30,						October 29,				October 30,						October 29,				October 30,
(in thousands)		2011				2010						2011				2010						2011				2010
Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationships
Foreign Exchange Forward Contracts		$	2,907			$	(1,574	)		Cost of Goods Sold		$	(596	)		$	1,587			Other Operating Expense (Income), Net		$	(331	)		$	27
		Thirty-Nine Weeks Ended
		October 29,				October 30,						October 29,				October 30,						October 29,				October 30,
(in thousands)		2011				2010						2011				2010						2011				2010
Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationships
Foreign Exchange Forward Contracts		$	805			$	(94	)		Cost of Goods Sold		$	(1,988	)		$	2,190			Other Operating Expense (Income), Net		$	(830	)		$	155

14.

DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

On June 16, 2009, A&F’s Board of Directors approved the closure of the Company’s 29 RUEHL branded stores and related direct-to-consumer operations. The Company completed the closure of the RUEHL branded stores and related direct-to-consumer operations during the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2009. Accordingly, the results of operations of RUEHL are reflected in Income from Discontinued Operations, Net of Tax on the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income for the thirty-nine weeks ended October 29, 2011 and October 30, 2010. Net income for the thirty-nine weeks ended October 29, 2011, included net income per diluted share of $0.01 from discontinued operations related to the settlement of outstanding lease obligations. Results from discontinued operations for the thirty-nine weeks ended October 30, 2010, were immaterial.

Costs associated with exit or disposal activities are recorded when the liability is incurred. Below is a roll forward from January 29, 2011 of the liabilities recognized on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of October 29, 2011 related to the closure of RUEHL branded stores and related direct-to-consumer operations (in millions):

		Thirty-Nine Weeks Ended
		October 29, 2011
Beginning Balance		$	17.2
Interest Accretion / Other, Net(1)			(1.3	)
Cash Payments			(15.7	)
Ending Balance(2)		$	0.2

15. SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN

Effective February 2, 2003, the Company established a Chief Executive Officer Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (the “SERP”) to provide additional retirement income to its Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”). Subject to service requirements, the CEO will receive a monthly benefit equal to 50% of his final average compensation (as defined in the SERP) for life. The final average compensation used for the calculation is based on actual compensation, base salary and cash incentive compensation, averaged over the last 36 consecutive full calendar months ending before the CEO’s retirement. The Company recorded expense of $0.1 million and $1.6 million for the thirteen and thirty-nine weeks ended October 29, 2011, respectively, associated with the SERP. The Company recorded expense of $0.5 million and $2.4 million for the thirteen and thirty-nine weeks ended October 30, 2010, respectively, associated with the SERP.

The expense for the thirty-nine weeks ended October 30, 2010, included an expense of $2.1 million to correct a cumulative under accrual of the SERP relating to prior periods, primarily Fiscal 2008. The Company does not believe this correction was material to the periods affected.

16. CONTINGENCIES

A&F is a defendant in lawsuits and other adversary proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. Legal costs incurred in connection with the resolution of claims and lawsuits are generally expensed as incurred, and the Company establishes reserves for the outcome of litigation where it deems appropriate to do so under applicable accounting rules. Actual liabilities may exceed the amounts reserved, and there can be no assurance that final resolution of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

The Company intends to defend the following pending matters vigorously, as appropriate. The Company is unable to quantify the potential exposure of the following pending matters. However, the Company’s assessment of the current exposure could change in the event of the discovery of additional facts with respect to legal matters pending against the Company or determinations by judges, juries, administrative agencies or other finders of fact that are not in accordance with the Company’s evaluation of the claims. The Company’s identified contingencies include the following matters:

On June 23, 2006, Lisa Hashimoto, et al. v. Abercrombie & Fitch Co. and Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc., was filed in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles. In that action, plaintiffs alleged, on behalf of a putative class of California store managers employed in Hollister and abercrombie kids stores, that they were entitled to receive overtime pay as “non-exempt” employees under California wage and hour laws. The complaint sought injunctive relief, equitable relief, unpaid overtime compensation, unpaid benefits, penalties, interest and attorneys’ fees and costs. The defendants answered the complaint on August 21, 2006, denying liability. On June 23, 2008, the defendants settled all claims of Hollister and abercrombie kids store managers who served in stores from June 23, 2002 through April 30, 2004, but continued to oppose the plaintiffs’ remaining claims. On January 29, 2009, the Court certified a class consisting of all store managers who served at Hollister and abercrombie kids stores in California from May 1, 2004 through the future date upon which the action concludes. The parties then continued to litigate the claims of that putative class. On May 24, 2010, plaintiffs filed a notice that they did not intend to continue to pursue their claim that members of the class did not exercise independent managerial judgment and discretion. They also asked the Court to vacate the August 9, 2010 trial date previously set by the Court. On July 20, 2010, the trial court vacated the trial date and the defendants then moved to decertify the putative class. On April 7, 2011, the trial court granted defendants’ motion and decertified the putative class. The parties continued to litigate the claims of the individual plaintiffs until November of 2011, when all of those claims were settled for an immaterial amount and released.

On September 16, 2005, a derivative action, styled The Booth Family Trust v. Michael S. Jeffries, et al., was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, naming A&F as a nominal defendant and seeking to assert claims for unspecified damages against nine of A&F’s present and former directors, alleging various breaches of the directors’ fiduciary duty and seeking equitable and monetary relief. In the following three months, four similar derivative actions were filed (three in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio and one in the Court of Common Pleas for Franklin County, Ohio) against present and former directors of A&F alleging various breaches of the directors’ fiduciary duty allegedly arising out of antecedent employment law and securities class actions brought against the Company. A consolidated amended derivative complaint was filed in the federal proceeding on July 10, 2006. On February 16, 2007, A&F announced that its Board of Directors had received a report of the Special Litigation Committee established by the Board to investigate and act with respect to claims asserted in the derivative cases, which concluded that there was no evidence to support the asserted claims and directed the Company to seek dismissal of the derivative cases. On September 10, 2007, the Company moved to dismiss the federal derivative cases on the authority of the Special Litigation Committee Report. On March 12, 2009, the Company’s motion was granted and, on April 10, 2009, plaintiffs filed an appeal from the order of dismissal in the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. On April 5, 2011, a panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit reversed the decision of the District Court and remanded the action for further proceedings. The state court has stayed further proceedings in the state-court derivative action until resolution of the consolidated federal derivative cases. On November 1, 2011, the District Court entered an order which gave preliminary approval to a proposed settlement of the consolidated derivative litigation. The District Court also set a hearing (the “Fairness Hearing”) for December 13, 2011 to determine whether the proposed settlement, which provides for revisions to certain of the Company’s corporate governance regulations, should be finally approved and to consider an award of fees and expenses to plaintiffs’ counsel. The District Court also directed that notice be given to the Company’s stockholders concerning the proposed settlement and their right to be heard in connection with the Fairness Hearing.

On December 21, 2007, Spencer de la Cruz, a former employee, filed an action against Abercrombie & Fitch Co. and Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc. (collectively, the “Defendants”) in the Superior Court of Orange County, California. He sought to allege, on behalf of himself and a putative class of past and present employees in the period beginning on December 19, 2003, claims for failure to provide meal breaks, for waiting time penalties, for failure to keep accurate employment records, and for unfair business practices. By successive amendments, plaintiff added 10 additional plaintiffs and additional claims seeking injunctive relief, unpaid wages, penalties, interest, and attorney’s fees and costs. Defendants have denied the material allegations of plaintiffs’ complaints throughout the litigation and have asserted numerous affirmative defenses. On July 23, 2010, plaintiffs moved for class certification in the action. On December 9, 2010, after briefing and argument, the trial court granted in part and denied in part plaintiffs’ motion, certifying sub-classes to pursue meal break claims, meal premium pay claims, work related travel claims, travel expense claims, termination pay claims, reporting time claims, bag check claims, pay record claims, and minimum wage claims. The parties are continuing to litigate questions relating to the Court’s certification order and to the merits of plaintiffs’ claims.

17. RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

Accounting Standards Codification 820-10 “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,” (“ASC 820-10”) was amended in January 2010 to require additional disclosures related to recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements. The guidance requires disclosure of transfers of assets and liabilities between Levels 1 and 2 of the fair value hierarchy, including the reasons and the timing of the transfers; and information on purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements on a gross basis in the reconciliation of the assets and liabilities measured under Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. The guidance was effective for the Company beginning on January 31, 2010. The disclosure guidance adopted on January 31, 2010, did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In May 2011, ASC 820-10 was further amended to clarify certain disclosure requirements and improve consistency with international reporting standards. This amendment is to be applied prospectively and is effective for the Company beginning January 28, 2012. The Company does not expect its adoption to have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.

Accounting Standards Codification Topic 220, “Comprehensive Income,” was amended in June 2011 to require entities to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. The amendment does not change the items that must be reported in other comprehensive income or when an item of other comprehensive income must be reclassified to net income under current GAAP. This guidance is effective for the Company’s fiscal year and interim periods beginning January 29, 2012. The Company does not expect its adoption to have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and
Stockholders of Abercrombie & Fitch Co.:

We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Abercrombie & Fitch Co. and its subsidiaries as of October 29, 2011 and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income for each of the thirteen and thirty-nine week periods ended October 29, 2011 and October 30, 2010 and the consolidated statements of cash flows for the thirty-nine week periods ended October 29, 2011 and October 30, 2010. These interim financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management.

We conducted our review in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the accompanying consolidated interim financial statements for them to be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet as of January 29, 2011, and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income, of stockholders’ equity and of cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein), and in our report dated March 29, 2011, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of January 29, 2011, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.

/s/PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Columbus, Ohio

December 6, 2011

ITEM 2.		MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

OVERVIEW

The Company’s fiscal year ends on the Saturday closest to January 31. Fiscal years are designated in the consolidated financial statements and notes by the calendar year in which the fiscal year commences. All references herein to “Fiscal 2011” represent the 52-week fiscal year that will end on January 28, 2012, and to “Fiscal 2010” represent the 52-week fiscal year that ended January 29, 2011.

The Company is a specialty retailer that operates stores and direct-to-consumer operations in North America, Europe, and Asia. The Company sells casual sportswear apparel, including knit tops and woven shirts, graphic t-shirts, fleece, jeans and woven pants, shorts, sweaters, outerwear, personal care products and accessories for men, women and kids under the Abercrombie & Fitch, abercrombie kids and Hollister brands. In addition, the Company operates stores and direct-to-consumer operations under the Gilly Hicks brand offering bras, underwear, personal care products, sleepwear and at-home products for women.

Abercrombie & Fitch is rooted in East Coast traditions and Ivy League heritage, the essence of privilege and casual luxury. Abercrombie & Fitch is a combination of classic and sexy creating an atmosphere that is confident and just a bit provocative. abercrombie kids directly follows in the footsteps of its older sibling, Abercrombie & Fitch. abercrombie kids has an energetic attitude and is popular, wholesome and athletic — the signature of All-American cool. Hollister is young, spirited, with a sense of humor and brings Southern California to the world. Gilly Hicks is the cheeky cousin of Abercrombie & Fitch, inspired by the free spirit of Sydney, Australia. Gilly Hicks is classic and vibrant, always confident and is the All-American brand with a Sydney sensibility.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

During the third quarter of Fiscal 2011, net sales increased 21% to $1.076 million from $885.8 million for the third quarter of Fiscal 2010. The impact of foreign currency on sales (based on converting prior year sales at current year exchange rates) for the thirteen weeks ended October 29, 2011 was a benefit of approximately 0.6% of sales. The gross profit rate for the third quarter of Fiscal 2011 was 60.1% compared to 63.7% for the third quarter of Fiscal 2010. Operating income was $79.9 million for the third quarter of Fiscal 2011 compared to $78.4 million for the third quarter of Fiscal 2010. The Company had net income of $50.9 million for the third quarter of Fiscal 2011 compared to net income of $50.0 million for the third quarter of Fiscal 2010. Net income per diluted share was $0.57 for the third quarter of Fiscal 2011 compared to $0.56 for the third quarter of Fiscal 2010. Results from discontinued operations were immaterial for the thirteen weeks ended October 29, 2011 and October 30, 2010.

During the Fiscal 2011 year-to-date period, net sales increased 22% to $2.829 billion from $2.319 billion in Fiscal 2010. The impact of foreign currency on sales for the thirty-nine weeks ended October 29, 2011 was a benefit of approximately 1.0% of sales. The gross profit rate for the Fiscal 2011 year-to-date period was 62.7% compared to 63.9% for the comparable year-to-date period for Fiscal 2010. Operating income was $165.8 million in the Fiscal 2011 year-to-date period, compared to $87.2 million in Fiscal 2010. The Company had net income of $108.1 million in the Fiscal 2011 year-to-date period compared to net income of $57.7 million in Fiscal 2010. Net income per diluted share was $1.20 in the Fiscal 2011 year-to-date period compared to $0.64 in Fiscal 2010. Fiscal 2010 year-to-date net income per share included a charge of $0.02 per diluted share associated with store closures. Fiscal 2011 year-to-date net income per share included a benefit of $0.01 per diluted share from discontinued operations. Results from discontinued operations were immaterial for the Fiscal 2010 year-to-date period.

As of October 29, 2011, the Company had $488.3 million in cash and equivalents, no borrowings under the credit agreement and immaterial outstanding letters of credit, compared to $593.3 million in cash and equivalents, borrowings under the credit agreement of $57.2 million and outstanding letters of credit of $10.6 million as of October 30, 2010. The decrease in letters of credit outstanding is related to an adjustment to vendor payment terms.

Net cash provided by operating activities was $64.5 million for the thirty-nine weeks ended October 29, 2011. In addition, the Company used cash of $227.6 million for capital expenditures, $45.0 million for the repayment of the outstanding balance under the credit agreement, $45.8 million for dividends, and $98.7 million to repurchase 1.5 million shares of A&F’s Common Stock during the thirty-nine weeks ended October 29, 2011.

Total inventory, at cost, was $679.3 million as of October 29, 2011, compared to $511.8 million as of October 30, 2010, an 33% increase.

Due to seasonal variations in the retail industry, the results of operations for any current period are not necessarily indicative of the results expected for the full fiscal year. The seasonality of the Company’s operations may also lead to significant fluctuations in certain asset and liability accounts.

The following data represents the amounts shown in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income for the thirteen and thirty-nine week periods ended October 29, 2011 and October 30, 2010, expressed as a percentage of net sales:

		Thirteen Weeks Ended								Thirty-Nine Weeks Ended
		October 29,				October 30,				October 29,				October 30,
		2011				2010				2011				2010
NET SALES			100.0	%			100.0	%			100.0	%			100.0	%
Cost of Goods Sold			39.9	%			36.3	%			37.3	%			36.1	%
GROSS PROFIT			60.1	%			63.7	%			62.7	%			63.9	%
Stores and Distribution Expense			42.9	%			43.5	%			45.5	%			47.6	%
Marketing, General and Administrative Expense			10.0	%			11.6	%			11.5	%			12.7	%
Other Operating Income, Net			(0.3	)%			(0.2	)%			(0.1	)%			(0.2	)%
OPERATING INCOME			7.4	%			8.8	%			5.9	%			3.8	%
Interest Expense, Net			0.0	%			0.1	%			0.1	%			0.1	%
INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE TAXES			7.4	%			8.8	%			5.8	%			3.7	%
Tax Expense from Continuing Operations			2.6	%			3.1	%			2.0	%			1.2	%
NET INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS			4.7	%			5.6	%			3.8	%			2.5	%
INCOME FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS, Net of Tax			—				—				0.0	%			—
NET INCOME			4.7	%			5.6	%			3.8	%			2.5	%

Financial Summary

The following summarized financial and statistical data compare the thirteen and thirty-nine week periods ended October 29, 2011 to the thirteen and thirty-nine week periods ended October 30, 2010:

		Thirteen Weeks Ended								Thirty-Nine Weeks Ended
		October 29, 2011				October 30, 2010				October 29, 2011				October 30, 2010
Net sales by brand (millions)		$	1,075.9			$	885.8			$	2,829.3			$	2,319.4
Abercrombie & Fitch		$	436.1			$	384.1			$	1,161.1			$	1,023.4
abercrombie		$	104.2			$	99.9			$	274.1			$	257.7
Hollister		$	518.0			$	392.5			$	1,346.7			$	1,012.9
Gilly Hicks*		$	17.6			$	9.3			$	47.4			$	25.4
Increase in net sales from prior year			21	%			18	%			22	%			16	%
Abercrombie & Fitch			14	%			18	%			13	%			17	%
abercrombie			4	%			10	%			6	%			11	%
Hollister			32	%			18	%			33	%			16	%
Gilly Hicks			89	%			79	%			87	%			50	%
Increase in comparable store sales**			7	%			7	%			8	%			5	%
Abercrombie & Fitch			4	%			8	%			5	%			7	%
abercrombie			6	%			2	%			8	%			3	%
Hollister			8	%			7	%			10	%			3	%
Increase in net sales from prior year			21	%			18	%			22	%			16	%
U.S.***			14	%			8	%			13	%			7	%
International***			56	%			87	%			64	%			90	%
Direct-to-consumer sales (including shipping & handling)			41	%			31	%			34	%			39	%