|
|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| |||||||||
These excerpts taken from the ACHN 10-K filed Mar 11, 2010. Comparison of the Years Ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 The decrease in revenue in 2008 is primarily due to a change in estimate of our remaining performance obligations under our collaboration with Gilead. Under the proportionate performance method, periodic revenue related to up-front license and milestone payments is recognized as the percentage of actual effort expended in that period to total effort expected for all of our performance obligations under the arrangement. The most recent project plan agreed upon by the joint research committee resulted in an increase to our total efforts under the collaboration and extended our estimated obligation period under the collaboration to the second half of 2010, resulting in an adjustment to our proportion of completed performance. Accordingly, in the fourth quarter of 2008, we recorded a decrease to revenue under the cumulative catch up method to reflect the Companys proportionate performance through December 31, 2008. This adjustment reflected our increased remaining performance obligations, which effectively reduced the proportion of our performance obligations that have been completed to date. This change in estimate caused a non-cash reduction in amounts previously recognized as revenue under the collaboration resulting in negative revenue for the fourth quarter of 2008.
58
Table of ContentsComparison of the Years Ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 The decrease in research and development expenses from 2007 to 2008 was primarily due to lower outsourced research costs related to phase II trials for elvucitabine and the completion of preclinical testing of ACH-702 in 2007 partially offset by increased costs associated with ACH-1625 preclinical studies and an upfront license fee under a collaboration with FOB Synthesis which was terminated in April 2009. In addition, the State of Connecticut provides companies with the opportunity to forego certain research and development tax credit carryforwards in exchange for cash. The program provides for such exchange of the research and development credits at a rate of 65% of the annual incremental and non-incremental research and development credits, as defined. The $828,000 decrease from 2007 to 2008 is due to the decrease in the incremental portion of the credit resulting from comparable eligible research and development expenditures in 2008 and 2007.
59
Table of ContentsComparison of the Years Ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 The slight increase in general and administrative expenses from 2007 to 2008 was primarily due to increased non-cash stock compensation, offset by a decrease in professional costs associated with certain market studies performed during 2007 that were not repeated in 2008. Comparison of the Years Ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 Interest income (expense). Interest income was $707,000 and $2.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The $1.8 million decrease from 2007 to 2008 was primarily due to decreased average cash balances combined with lower interest rates paid on those balances.
60
Table of ContentsInterest expense was $1.1 million and $964,000 for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. These excerpts taken from the ACHN 10-K filed Mar 27, 2009. Comparison of the Years Ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 The decrease in revenue in 2008 is primarily due to a change in estimate of our remaining performance obligations under our collaboration with Gilead. Under the proportionate performance method, periodic revenue related to up-front license and milestone payments is recognized as the percentage of actual effort expended in that period to total effort expected for all of our performance obligations under the arrangement. The most recent project plan agreed upon by the joint research committee resulted in an increase to our total efforts under the collaboration and extended our estimated obligation period under the collaboration to the second half of 2010, resulting in an adjustment to our proportion of completed performance. Accordingly, in the fourth quarter of 2008, we recorded a decrease to revenue under the cumulative catch up method to reflect the Companys proportionate performance through December 31, 2008. This adjustment reflected our increased remaining performance obligations, which effectively reduced the proportion of our performance obligations that have been completed to date. This change in estimate caused a non-cash reduction in amounts previously recognized as revenue under the collaboration resulting in negative revenue for the fourth quarter of 2008. Comparison of the Years Ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 The decrease in research and development expenses from 2007 to 2008 was primarily due to lower outsourced research costs related to phase II trials for elvucitabine and the completion of preclinical testing of ACH-702 in 2007, partially offset by increased costs associated with ACH-1625 preclinical studies and an upfront license fee under our collaboration with FOB Synthesis. We expect a slight reduction in research and development expenses over the next twelve months as a result of the reduction of expenses related to the near completion of the phase II clinical program for elvucitabine, the reduction of expenses relating to ACH-702 and the termination of our collaboration agreement with FOB Synthesis, offset by increased expenses related to the initiation of human clinical trials for ACH-1095 and ACH-1625. Comparison of the Years Ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 The slight increase in general and administrative expenses from 2007 to 2008 was primarily due to increased non-cash stock compensation, offset by a decrease in professional costs associated with certain market studies performed during 2007 that were not repeated in 2008. We expect that general and administrative expenses will remain substantially unchanged over the next twelve months. Comparison of the Years Ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 Interest income (expense). Interest income was $707,000 and $2.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The $1.8 million decrease from 2007 to 2008 was primarily due to decreased average cash balances combined with lower interest rates paid on those balances. Interest expense was $1.1 million and $964,000 for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Tax benefit. The State of Connecticut provides companies with the opportunity to forego certain research and development tax credit carryforwards in exchange for cash. The program provides for such exchange of the research and development credits at a rate of 65% of the annual incremental and non-incremental research and development credits, as defined. The amount of tax benefit we recognized in connection with this exchange program was $132,000 and $960,000 for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The $828,000 decrease from 2007 to 2008 is due to the decrease in the incremental portion of the credit resulting from comparable eligible research and development expenditures in 2008 and 2007. Comparison of the Years Ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 STYLE="margin-top:6px;margin-bottom:0px; text-indent:4%">The decrease in research and development expenses from 2007 to 2008 was primarily due to lower outsourced research costs related to phase II trials forelvucitabine and the completion of preclinical testing of ACH-702 in 2007, partially offset by increased costs associated with ACH-1625 preclinical studies and an upfront license fee under our collaboration with FOB Synthesis. We expect a slight reduction in research and development expenses over the next twelve months as a result of the reduction of expenses related to the near completion of the phase II clinical program for elvucitabine, the reduction of expenses relating to ACH-702 and the termination of our collaboration agreement with FOB Synthesis, offset by increased expenses related to the initiation of human clinical trials for ACH-1095 and ACH-1625. FACE="Times New Roman" SIZE="2">Comparison of the Years Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 The increase in research and
57 Table of ContentsComparison of the Years Ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 STYLE="margin-top:6px;margin-bottom:0px; text-indent:4%">The slight increase in general and administrative expenses from 2007 to 2008 was primarily due to increased non-cash stock compensation, offset by adecrease in professional costs associated with certain market studies performed during 2007 that were not repeated in 2008. We expect that general and administrative expenses will remain substantially unchanged over the next twelve months. | EXCERPTS ON THIS PAGE:
RELATED TOPICS for ACHN: |
| |||||||