|
|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| |||||||||
ATVI » Topics » Accounting Changes and Error Corrections - A Replacement of APB Opinion No. 20 and FASB Statement No. 3This excerpt taken from the ATVI 10-K filed Jun 9, 2006. Accounting Changes and Error Corrections A
Replacement of APB Opinion No. 20 and FASB Statement No. 3.
SFAS No. 154 changes the requirements for the accounting and reporting of
a change in accounting principle and correction of errors. Under previous
guidance, changes in accounting principle were recognized as a cumulative
effect in the net income of the period of the change. The new statement
requires retrospective application of changes in accounting principle and
correction of errors, limited to the direct effects of the change, to prior
periods financial statements, unless it is impracticable to determine either
the period-specific effects or the cumulative effect of the change. SFAS
No. 154 is effective for accounting changes and correction of errors made
in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. In the event that we
have an accounting change or an error correction, SFAS No. 154 could have
a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
On February 16, 2006, the FASB issued Statement No. 155 (SFAS No. 155), This excerpt taken from the ATVI 10-Q filed Feb 8, 2006. Accounting Changes
and Error Corrections A Replacement of APB Opinion No. 20 and FASB
Statement No. 3. SFAS No. 154
changes the requirements for the accounting and reporting of a change in accounting
principle and correction of errors. Under previous guidance, changes in
accounting principle were recognized as a cumulative effect in the net income
of the period of the change. The new statement requires retrospective
application of changes in accounting principle and correction of errors,
limited to the direct effects of the change, to prior periods financial
statements, unless it is impracticable to determine either the period-specific
effects or the cumulative effect of the change.
SFAS No. 154 is effective for accounting changes and correction of
errors made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. In the
event that we have an accounting change or an error correction, SFAS No. 154
could have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
On October 22, 2004, the President of the United States signed the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (the Act). The Act raises a number of issues with respect to accounting for income taxes. For companies that pay U.S. income taxes on manufacturing activities in the U.S., the Act provides a deduction from taxable income equal to a stipulated percentage of qualified income from domestic production activities. The manufacturing deduction provided by the Act replaces the extraterritorial income (ETI) deduction currently in place. We currently derive benefits from the ETI exclusion which was repealed by the Act. Our exclusion for fiscal 2006 and 2007 will be limited to 75% and 45% of the otherwise allowable exclusion and no exclusion will be available in fiscal 2008 and thereafter. The Act also creates a temporary incentive for U.S. multinationals to repatriate accumulated income earned abroad by providing an 85 percent dividends received deduction for certain dividends from controlled foreign corporations (Homeland Investment Act). The deduction is subject to a number of limitations. The Act also provides for other changes in tax law that will affect a variety of taxpayers. On December 21, 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued two FASB Staff Positions (FSP) regarding the accounting implications of the Act related to (1) the deduction for qualified domestic production activities and (2) the one-time tax benefit for the repatriation of foreign earnings. The FASB determined that the deduction for qualified domestic production activities should be accounted for as a special deduction under FASB Statement No. 109, This excerpt taken from the ATVI 10-Q filed Nov 3, 2005. Accounting Changes
and Error Corrections A Replacement of APB Opinion No. 20 and FASB
Statement No. 3. SFAS No. 154
changes the requirements for the accounting and reporting of a change in
accounting principle and correction of errors.
49
Under previous guidance, changes in accounting principle were recognized as a cumulative effect in the net income of the period of the change. The new statement requires retrospective application of changes in accounting principle and correction of errors, limited to the direct effects of the change, to prior periods financial statements, unless it is impracticable to determine either the period-specific effects or the cumulative effect of the change. SFAS No. 154 is effective for accounting changes and correction of errors made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005.
On October 22, 2004, the President of the United States signed the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (the Act). The Act raises a number of issues with respect to accounting for income taxes. For companies that pay U.S. income taxes on manufacturing activities in the U.S., the Act provides a deduction from taxable income equal to a stipulated percentage of qualified income from domestic production activities. The manufacturing deduction provided by the Act replaces the extraterritorial income (ETI) deduction currently in place. We currently derive benefits from the ETI exclusion which was repealed by the Act. Our exclusion for fiscal 2006 and 2007 will be limited to 75% and 45% of the otherwise allowable exclusion and no exclusion will be available in fiscal 2008 and thereafter. The Act also creates a temporary incentive for U.S. multinationals to repatriate accumulated income earned abroad by providing an 85 percent dividends received deduction for certain dividends from controlled foreign corporations. The deduction is subject to a number of limitations. The Act also provides for other changes in tax law that will affect a variety of taxpayers. On December 21, 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued two FASB Staff Positions (FSP) regarding the accounting implications of the Act related to (1) the deduction for qualified domestic production activities and (2) the one-time tax benefit for the repatriation of foreign earnings. The FASB determined that the deduction for qualified domestic production activities should be accounted for as a special deduction under FASB Statement No. 109, | EXCERPTS ON THIS PAGE:
RELATED TOPICS for ATVI: |
| |||||||