|
|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
This excerpt taken from the ADLR DEF 14A filed Apr 4, 2008. Deductibility of Certain Compensation Payments made during 2007 to the Companys executives under the various programs discussed above were made with regard to the provisions of section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code that became effective on January 1, 1994. Section 162(m) limits the deduction that may be claimed by a public company for compensation paid to certain individuals to $1,000,000 except to the extent that any excess compensation is performance-based compensation. The definition of performance-based compensation includes compensation deemed paid on the exercise of certain stock options. The exercised stock options must have an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the option shares on the grant date to qualify as performance-based compensation. The 1994 Plan and the 2003 Plan are intended to ensure that the exercise of such stock options will qualify as performance-based compensation. Through December 31, 2007, this provision has not affected our tax deductions, and the Committee believes that, at the present time, it is quite unlikely that the compensation paid to any of our employees in a taxable year, which is subject to the deduction limit, will exceed $1,000,000. The Committee intends to continue to evaluate the effects of the statute and any applicable regulations and to comply with Internal Revenue Code section 162(m) in the future to the extent consistent with the best interests of the Company.
- 24 -
Table of ContentsThis excerpt taken from the ADLR DEF 14A filed Mar 29, 2007. Deductibility of Certain Compensation Payments made during 2006 to the Companys executives under the various programs discussed above were made with regard to the provisions of section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code that became effective on January 1, 1994. Section 162(m) limits the deduction that may be claimed by a public company for compensation paid to certain individuals to $1,000,000 except to the extent that any excess compensation is performance-based compensation. The definition of performance-based compensation includes compensation deemed paid on the exercise of certain stock options. The exercised stock options must have an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the option shares on the grant date to qualify as performance-based compensation. The 1994 Plan and the 2003 Plan are intended to ensure that the exercise of such stock options will qualify as performance-based compensation. Through December 31, 2006, this provision has not affected our tax deductions, and the Committee believes that, at the present time, it is quite unlikely that the compensation paid to any of our employees in a taxable year, which is subject to the deduction limit, will exceed $1,000,000. The Committee intends to continue to evaluate the effects of the statute and any applicable regulations and to comply with Internal Revenue Code section 162(m) in the future to the extent consistent with the best interests of the Company. This excerpt taken from the ADLR DEF 14A filed Mar 29, 2006. Deductibility of Certain Compensation Payments during 2005 to the Companys executives under the various programs discussed above were made with regard to the provisions of section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code that became effective on January 1, 1994. Section 162(m) limits the deduction that may be claimed by a public company for compensation paid to certain individuals to $1,000,000 except to the extent that any excess compensation is performance-based compensation. The definition of performance-based compensation includes compensation deemed paid on the exercise of certain stock options. The exercised stock options must have an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the option shares on the grant date to qualify as performance-based compensation. The 1994 Plan and the 2003 Plan are intended to ensure that the exercise of such stock options will qualify as performance-based compensation. Through December 31, 2005, this provision has not affected our tax deductions, and the Compensation Committee believes that, at the present time, it is quite unlikely that the compensation paid to any of our employees in a taxable year, which is subject to the deduction limit, will exceed $1,000,000. The Compensation Committee intends to continue to evaluate the effects of the statute and any applicable regulations and to comply with Internal Revenue Code section 162(m) in the future to the extent consistent with the best interests of the Company. MEMBERS OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE Claude Nash, Ph.D. (Chairman) Armando Anido Robert Nelsen This excerpt taken from the ADLR DEF 14A filed Apr 27, 2005. Deductibility of Certain Compensation
Payments during 2004 to the Companys executives under the various programs discussed above were made with regard to the provisions of section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code that became effective on January 1, 1994. Section 162(m) limits the deduction that may be claimed by a public company for compensation paid to certain individuals to $1,000,000 except to the extent that any excess compensation is performance-based compensation. The definition of performance-based compensation includes compensation deemed paid on the exercise of certain stock options. The exercised stock options must have an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the option shares on the grant date to qualify as performance-based compensation. The 1994 Plan and the 2003 Plan are intended to ensure that the exercise of such stock options will qualify as performance-based compensation. Through December 31, 2004, this provision has not affected our tax deductions, and the Compensation Committee believes that, at the present time, it is quite unlikely that the compensation paid to any of our employees in a taxable year, which is subject to the deduction limit, will exceed $1,000,000. The Compensation Committee intends to continue to evaluate the effects of the statute and any applicable regulations and to comply with Internal Revenue Code section 162(m) in the future to the extent consistent with the best interests of the Company.
MEMBERS OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
Claude Nash, Ph.D. (Chair) Armando Anido Robert Nelsen
- 15 -
Table of Contents | EXCERPTS ON THIS PAGE:
|
| |||||||