|
|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| |||||||||
These excerpts taken from the EYE 10-K filed Feb 24, 2009. Goodwill, Intangible Assets and Long-Lived Assets Goodwill represents the excess of acquisition costs over the fair value of net assets of purchased businesses. Intangible assets include patents, licensing agreements, customer relationships and technology rights, which are amortized utilizing the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives ranging from 3 to 19 years, and non-amortizable trademarks.
38
Table of ContentsGoodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets are not amortized, but instead are subject to a periodic impairment review performed during the second quarter of each fiscal year. We also review the carrying amount of goodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets in interim periods whenever events and circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of these assets may not be recoverable. Impairment indicators include, among other conditions, cash flow deficits, historic or anticipated declines in revenue or operating profit and adverse legal or regulatory developments. We review the recoverability of our goodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets by comparing each units fair value to the book value of its net assets. In a business combination, goodwill is allocated to our various reporting units, which are the same as our reportable segments, based on relative fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. If the book value of the reporting units net assets exceeds its fair value, the goodwill is written down to its implied fair value. Goodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets are specifically identified to each reportable unit. Since each manufacturing plant is dedicated to a specific product category that corresponds to our reportable segments, assets and liabilities related to manufacturing operations are specifically identified to each reportable unit. Assets and liabilities of our commercial operations are not specifically identified since these amounts benefit multiple business units. We use revenue as a key measure in evaluating the performance of each business unit and the determination of resources to be dedicated to each business unit. Therefore, we believe that revenue generated by each reporting unit provides a reasonable measure to use as a basis to apply a consistent allocation methodology. Accordingly, assets and liabilities for our commercial operations have been assigned to the reporting units based on revenues generated by each reporting unit. In the second quarters of 2008, 2007 and 2006, we performed our annual impairment tests of our goodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets, and no impairment was indicated based on these tests. In the fourth quarter of 2008, as the result of a greater than 50% decline in the price of our common stock from mid-October through December 31, 2008 resulting from announced reductions in our projected revenues and operating results in October 2008 and overall declines in the broader stock markets, we believed that the carrying amount of goodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets may not be recoverable. Consequently, we reviewed the carrying amounts of these assets to determine the extent of impairment, if any. We first reviewed our non-amortizable VISX and IntraLase tradename intangible assets, and compared the fair values on a discounted cash flow basis to the carrying values. The fair values were determined using a discount rate of 13%, relief from royalty rates of 5-6% and projected revenues over the next 6 years plus a terminal value. The terminal value was determined under the Gordon Growth Model, using a discount rate of 13% and a long-term growth rate of 3%. After comparing their calculated fair values to their carrying values, we determined that the carrying value of the VISX tradename exceeded its fair value. Accordingly, an impairment charge of approximately $36.4 million was recognized in the year ended December 31, 2008. A 1% increase in the discount rate or a 1% decrease in the relief from royalty rate or long-term growth rate would not trigger an impairment of the Intralase tradename intangible asset. A 1% increase in the discount rate or a 1% decrease in the relief from royalty rate or long-term growth rate would increase the impairment charge in the VISX trade name by a range of $5 million to $16 million. After considering the recognized non-amortizable VISX tradename impairment, we evaluated our goodwill balances by comparing the fair values of our reporting units to their carrying values. Although the fair values of each reporting unit were determined individually using a discounted cash flow approach, the combined fair value of our reporting units was reconciled to the purchase price to be paid by Abbott, as we believe this amount is our best indicator of fair value. The fair value of each reporting unit was determined using projected cash flows over the next 6 years plus a terminal value, using discount rates for each reporting unit ranging from 13% to 18%. The terminal values were determined under the Gordon Growth Model, using the corresponding discount rates and long term growth rates of 3%. Based on the discounted cash flow analysis, we determined that the fair values of our refractive and cataract reporting units exceeded their carrying values, and, consequently, no goodwill impairment was recognized for these reporting units. However, we determined that goodwill for the eye care reporting unit was impaired, and, accordingly, performed a step 2 analysis to determine the amount of the impairment. As a result, an impairment charge of approximately $36.2 million was recognized in the year ended December 31, 2008 representing the entire goodwill balance of this reporting unit. A 1% increase in the discount rates or a 1% decrease in the long-term growth rates for each reporting unit would not trigger any additional goodwill impairment. We believe that the assumptions and rates used in our goodwill and non-amortizable intangible asset impairment testing are reasonable, but they are judgmental, and variations in any of the assumptions or rates could result in materially different calculations of fair values, and ultimately the amount, if any, of impairment charges that are recognized.
39
Table of ContentsShould the merger with Abbott not be consummated on the terms and timing currently anticipated, or at all, the market values of our common stock and our debt could decline from the current values, which may result in material impairment charges in future periods. In accordance with SFAS 144, we assess potential impairment to our long-lived assets, including amortizable intangible assets, when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be fully recoverable. If required, an impairment loss is recognized as the difference between the carrying value and the fair value of the assets. In the fourth quarter of 2008, we reviewed the recoverability of our long-lived assets in conjunction with the goodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets, and concluded that the long-lived assets were recoverable and no impairment was indicated. Goodwill, Intangible Assets and Long-Lived Assets STYLE="margin-top:6px;margin-bottom:0px; text-indent:4%">Goodwill represents the excess of acquisition costs over the fair value of net assets of purchased businesses. Intangible assets include patents,licensing agreements, customer relationships and technology rights, which are amortized utilizing the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives ranging from 3 to 19 years, and non-amortizable trademarks. STYLE="margin-top:0px;margin-bottom:0px"> 38 Table of ContentsGoodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets are not amortized, but instead are subject to a periodic assets. In a business combination, goodwill is allocated to our various reporting units, which are the same as our reportable segments, based on relative fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. If the book value of the reporting units net assets exceeds its fair value, the goodwill is written down to its implied fair value. Goodwill and non-amortizable impairment was indicated based on these tests. In the fourth quarter of 2008, as the result of a greater than 50% decline in the price of our common stock from mid-October through December 31, 2008 resulting from announced reductions in our projected revenues and operating results in October 2008 and overall declines in the broader stock markets, we believed that the carrying amount of goodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets may not be recoverable. Consequently, we reviewed the carrying amounts of these assets to determine the extent of impairment, if any. We first reviewed our non-amortizable VISX and IntraLase tradename intangible assets, and compared the fair values on a discounted cash flow basis to the carrying values. The fair values were determined using a discount rate of 13%, relief from royalty rates of 5-6% and projected revenues over the next 6 years plus a terminal value. The terminal value was determined under the Gordon Growth Model, using a discount rate of 13% and a long-term growth rate of 3%. After comparing their calculated fair values to their carrying values, we determined that the carrying value of the VISX tradename exceeded its fair value. Accordingly, an impairment charge of approximately $36.4 million was recognized in the year ended December 31, 2008. A 1% increase in the discount rate or a 1% decrease in the relief from royalty rate or long-term growth rate would not trigger an impairment of the Intralase tradename intangible asset. A 1% increase in the discount rate or a 1% decrease in the relief from royalty rate or long-term growth rate would increase the impairment charge in the VISX trade name by a range of $5 million to $16 million. After considering the recognized non-amortizable VISX tradename impairment, we evaluated our goodwill balances by comparing the fair values of our judgmental, and variations in any of the assumptions or rates could result in materially different calculations of fair values, and ultimately the amount, if any, of impairment charges that are recognized. STYLE="margin-top:0px;margin-bottom:0px"> 39 Table of ContentsShould the merger with Abbott not be consummated on the terms and timing currently anticipated, or at FACE="Times New Roman" SIZE="2">In accordance with SFAS 144, we assess potential impairment to our long-lived assets, including amortizable intangible assets, when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset FACE="Times New Roman" SIZE="2">Income Taxes We account for income taxes under the asset and liability method, whereby deferred tax Taxes An Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (FIN 48), which requires income tax positions to meet a more-likely-than-not recognition threshold to be recognized in the financial statements. Under FIN 48, tax positions that previously failed to meet the more-likely-than-not threshold should be recognized in the first subsequent financial reporting period in which that threshold is met. Previously recognized tax positions that no longer meet the more-likely-than-not threshold should be derecognized in the first subsequent financial reporting period in which that threshold is no longer met. As a multinational corporation, we are subject to taxation in many jurisdictions, our income tax returns in several locations are being examined by the local tax authorities and the calculation of our tax liabilities involves dealing with uncertainties in the application of complex tax laws and regulations in various tax jurisdictions. The application of tax laws and regulations is subject to legal and factual interpretation, judgment and uncertainty. Tax laws and regulations themselves are subject to change as a result of changes in fiscal policy, changes in legislation, evolution of regulations and court rulings. Therefore, the actual liability for U.S. or foreign taxes may be materially different from our estimates, which could result in the need to record additional tax liabilities or potentially to reverse previously recorded tax liabilities. Goodwill, Intangible Assets and Long-Lived Assets STYLE="margin-top:6px;margin-bottom:0px; text-indent:4%">Goodwill represents the excess of acquisition costs over the fair value of net assets of purchased businesses. Intangible assets include patents,licensing agreements, customer relationships and technology rights, which are amortized utilizing the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives ranging from 3 to 19 years, and non-amortizable trademarks. STYLE="margin-top:0px;margin-bottom:0px"> 38 Table of ContentsGoodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets are not amortized, but instead are subject to a periodic assets. In a business combination, goodwill is allocated to our various reporting units, which are the same as our reportable segments, based on relative fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. If the book value of the reporting units net assets exceeds its fair value, the goodwill is written down to its implied fair value. Goodwill and non-amortizable impairment was indicated based on these tests. In the fourth quarter of 2008, as the result of a greater than 50% decline in the price of our common stock from mid-October through December 31, 2008 resulting from announced reductions in our projected revenues and operating results in October 2008 and overall declines in the broader stock markets, we believed that the carrying amount of goodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets may not be recoverable. Consequently, we reviewed the carrying amounts of these assets to determine the extent of impairment, if any. We first reviewed our non-amortizable VISX and IntraLase tradename intangible assets, and compared the fair values on a discounted cash flow basis to the carrying values. The fair values were determined using a discount rate of 13%, relief from royalty rates of 5-6% and projected revenues over the next 6 years plus a terminal value. The terminal value was determined under the Gordon Growth Model, using a discount rate of 13% and a long-term growth rate of 3%. After comparing their calculated fair values to their carrying values, we determined that the carrying value of the VISX tradename exceeded its fair value. Accordingly, an impairment charge of approximately $36.4 million was recognized in the year ended December 31, 2008. A 1% increase in the discount rate or a 1% decrease in the relief from royalty rate or long-term growth rate would not trigger an impairment of the Intralase tradename intangible asset. A 1% increase in the discount rate or a 1% decrease in the relief from royalty rate or long-term growth rate would increase the impairment charge in the VISX trade name by a range of $5 million to $16 million. After considering the recognized non-amortizable VISX tradename impairment, we evaluated our goodwill balances by comparing the fair values of our judgmental, and variations in any of the assumptions or rates could result in materially different calculations of fair values, and ultimately the amount, if any, of impairment charges that are recognized. STYLE="margin-top:0px;margin-bottom:0px"> 39 Table of ContentsShould the merger with Abbott not be consummated on the terms and timing currently anticipated, or at FACE="Times New Roman" SIZE="2">In accordance with SFAS 144, we assess potential impairment to our long-lived assets, including amortizable intangible assets, when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset FACE="Times New Roman" SIZE="2">Income Taxes We account for income taxes under the asset and liability method, whereby deferred tax Taxes An Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (FIN 48), which requires income tax positions to meet a more-likely-than-not recognition threshold to be recognized in the financial statements. Under FIN 48, tax positions that previously failed to meet the more-likely-than-not threshold should be recognized in the first subsequent financial reporting period in which that threshold is met. Previously recognized tax positions that no longer meet the more-likely-than-not threshold should be derecognized in the first subsequent financial reporting period in which that threshold is no longer met. As a multinational corporation, we are subject to taxation in many jurisdictions, our income tax returns in several locations are being examined by the local tax authorities and the calculation of our tax liabilities involves dealing with uncertainties in the application of complex tax laws and regulations in various tax jurisdictions. The application of tax laws and regulations is subject to legal and factual interpretation, judgment and uncertainty. Tax laws and regulations themselves are subject to change as a result of changes in fiscal policy, changes in legislation, evolution of regulations and court rulings. Therefore, the actual liability for U.S. or foreign taxes may be materially different from our estimates, which could result in the need to record additional tax liabilities or potentially to reverse previously recorded tax liabilities. Goodwill, Intangible Assets and Long-Lived Assets Goodwill represents the excess of acquisition costs over the fair value of net assets of purchased businesses. Intangible assets include patents, licensing agreements, customer relationships and technology rights, which are amortized utilizing a straight-line method over their estimated useful lives ranging from 3 to 19 years, and non-amortizable trademarks. Goodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets are not amortized, but instead are subject to a periodic impairment review performed during the second quarter of each fiscal year. The Company also reviews the carrying amount of goodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets in interim periods whenever events and circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of these assets may not be recoverable. Impairment indicators include, among other conditions, cash flow deficits, historic or anticipated declines in revenue or operating profit and adverse legal or regulatory developments. The Company reviews the recoverability of its goodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets by comparing each units fair value to the book value of its net assets. In a business combination, goodwill is allocated to the Companys various reporting units, which are the same as the Companys reportable segments, based on relative fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. If the book value of the reporting units net assets exceeds its fair value, the goodwill is written down to its implied fair value. Goodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets are specifically identified to each reportable unit. Since each manufacturing plant is substantially dedicated to a specific product category that corresponds to its reportable segment, assets and liabilities related to manufacturing operations are specifically identified to each reportable unit. Assets and liabilities of our commercial operations are not specifically identified since these amounts benefit multiple business units. The Company uses revenue as a key measure in evaluating the performance of each business unit and the determination of resources to be dedicated to each business unit. Therefore, the Company believes that revenue generated by each reporting unit provides a reasonable measure to use as a basis to apply a consistent allocation methodology. Accordingly, assets and liabilities for our commercial operations have been assigned to the reporting units based on revenues generated by each reporting unit. In the second quarters of 2008, 2007 and 2006, the Company performed its annual impairment tests of its goodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets, and no impairment was indicated based on these tests. However, in the fourth quarter of 2008, an interim test of goodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets was performed. See Note 5.
64
Table of ContentsIn accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-lived Assets (SFAS 144), the Company assesses potential impairment to its long-lived assets, including amortizable intangible assets, when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be fully recoverable. If required, an impairment loss is recognized as the difference between the carrying value and the fair value of the assets. In the fourth quarter of 2008, management reviewed the recoverability of its long-lived assets in conjunction with the goodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets and concluded that the long-lived assets were recoverable and no impairment was indicated. Goodwill, Goodwill represents the excess of acquisition costs over the fair value of net assets of Goodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets are not amortized, but instead are subject to a periodic of its net assets. In a business combination, goodwill is allocated to the Companys various reporting units, which are the same as the Companys reportable segments, based on relative fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. If the book value of the reporting units net assets exceeds its fair value, the goodwill is written down to its implied fair value. SIZE="2">Goodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets are specifically identified to each reportable unit. Since each manufacturing plant is substantially dedicated to a specific product category that corresponds to its reportable segment, assets In the second quarters of 2008, 2007 and 2006, the Company performed its annual impairment tests of its goodwill and non-amortizable 64 Table of ContentsIn accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 144, The Goodwill, Goodwill represents the excess of acquisition costs over the fair value of net assets of Goodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets are not amortized, but instead are subject to a periodic of its net assets. In a business combination, goodwill is allocated to the Companys various reporting units, which are the same as the Companys reportable segments, based on relative fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. If the book value of the reporting units net assets exceeds its fair value, the goodwill is written down to its implied fair value. SIZE="2">Goodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets are specifically identified to each reportable unit. Since each manufacturing plant is substantially dedicated to a specific product category that corresponds to its reportable segment, assets In the second quarters of 2008, 2007 and 2006, the Company performed its annual impairment tests of its goodwill and non-amortizable 64 Table of ContentsIn accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 144, The | EXCERPTS ON THIS PAGE:
|
| |||||||