EYE » Topics » Product Rationalization and Repositioning Plan

These excerpts taken from the EYE 10-K filed Feb 24, 2009.

2005 Product Rationalization and Repositioning Plan

On October 31, 2005, our board of directors approved a product rationalization and repositioning plan covering the discontinuation of non-strategic cataract surgical and eye care products and the elimination or redeployment of resources that support these product lines. The plan also included organizational changes and potential reductions in force in manufacturing, sales and marketing associated with these product lines, as well as organizational changes in research and development and other corporate functions designed to align the organization with our strategy and strategic business unit organization. Product rationalization covered the discontinuation of non-strategic cataract surgical and eye care products and the elimination or redeployment of resources that supported these product lines. This impacted the scope of our business by eliminating future sales from discontinued products. Business repositioning covered changes in our business strategy and business unit organization. A key driver of the change was our acquisition of VISX in May 2005 which added laser vision correction to our product portfolio. This action, along with other considerations, resulted in many changes, including the movement from a regional organizational structure to a global business unit structure focused by major product categories, strategic and tactical alignment of our business units around common customers and distribution channels and how we market and sell our products to these customers. These changes necessitated organizational shifts as well as workforce reductions in manufacturing, research and development and other corporate functions. Given all the above, the breadth and depth of these changes created a fundamental reorganization that affected the nature and focus of operations.

We incurred charges for such items as organizational changes, brand repositioning, productivity initiatives and sales and marketing. Charges incurred for organizational changes resulted from the reorganization of our management structure from a regional structure to a business unit structure. In connection with the change in management structure, we incurred costs to redefine our strategic planning process, financial reporting processes, realignment and redeployment of customer support and administrative functions and related changes to the underlying infrastructure. Charges incurred for brand repositioning resulted from the reorganization to a business unit structure. We incurred costs to implement a new strategy to link our various product offerings to common customers and distribution channels among our three business units which impacted the manner in which our business is conducted. Charges incurred for productivity initiatives and sales and marketing resulted from our identification of opportunities to make improvements in manufacturing, customer service, information technology, administrative functions and customer and distributor education to support the reorganization to a business unit structure.

 

36


Table of Contents

Severance, relocation and related costs were incurred for worldwide workforce reductions due to our discontinuation of certain non-core products and infrastructure and process improvements associated with our productivity initiatives. The majority of these costs occurred in the United States, Japan and Europe. Net asset gains resulted from disposals of long-lived assets from certain discontinued non-core products and relocation of certain facilities, offset by asset write-downs which resulted from the impairment and disposal of long-lived assets from the reduction in expected future cash flows. The fair values of impaired assets were based on probability weighted expected cash flows as determined in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-lived Assets (“SFAS 144”).

The plan further called for increasing our investment in key growth opportunities, specifically our refractive implant product line and international laser vision correction business, and accelerating the implementation of productivity initiatives.

In 2006, we incurred $62.7 million of pre-tax charges, which included $16.3 million for inventory, manufacturing related and other charges included in cost of sales, and $46.4 million included in operating expenses for severance, relocation and other one-time termination benefits of $13.7 million, productivity and brand repositioning costs of $37.6 million, offset by net asset disposal gains of $2.8 million and a net credit from settlement of contractual obligations of $2.1 million. In 2005, we incurred $42.3 million in pre-tax charges which included $12.6 million for inventory related charges included in cost of sales, and $29.7 million included in operating expenses for severance, relocation and other one-time termination benefits of $14.0 million, asset write-downs of $9.2 million, contractual obligations of $2.7 million and accelerated productivity and brand repositioning costs of $3.8 million. The plan was completed in 2006. The cumulative charges incurred of $105.0 million were within the range previously announced.

2005 Product Rationalization and
Repositioning Plan

On October 31, 2005, our board of directors approved a product rationalization and repositioning plan covering
the discontinuation of non-strategic cataract surgical and eye care products and the elimination or redeployment of resources that support these product lines. The plan also included organizational changes and potential reductions in force in
manufacturing, sales and marketing associated with these product lines, as well as organizational changes in research and development and other corporate functions designed to align the organization with our strategy and strategic business unit
organization. Product rationalization covered the discontinuation of non-strategic cataract surgical and eye care products and the elimination or redeployment of resources that supported these product lines. This impacted the scope of our business
by eliminating future sales from discontinued products. Business repositioning covered changes in our business strategy and business unit organization. A key driver of the change was our acquisition of VISX in May 2005 which added laser vision
correction to our product portfolio. This action, along with other considerations, resulted in many changes, including the movement from a regional organizational structure to a global business unit structure focused by major product categories,
strategic and tactical alignment of our business units around common customers and distribution channels and how we market and sell our products to these customers. These changes necessitated organizational shifts as well as workforce reductions in
manufacturing, research and development and other corporate functions. Given all the above, the breadth and depth of these changes created a fundamental reorganization that affected the nature and focus of operations.

STYLE="margin-top:12px;margin-bottom:0px; text-indent:4%">We incurred charges for such items as organizational changes, brand repositioning, productivity initiatives and sales and marketing. Charges incurred for
organizational changes resulted from the reorganization of our management structure from a regional structure to a business unit structure. In connection with the change in management structure, we incurred costs to redefine our strategic planning
process, financial reporting processes, realignment and redeployment of customer support and administrative functions and related changes to the underlying infrastructure. Charges incurred for brand repositioning resulted from the reorganization to
a business unit structure. We incurred costs to implement a new strategy to link our various product offerings to common customers and distribution channels among our three business units which impacted the manner in which our business is conducted.
Charges incurred for productivity initiatives and sales and marketing resulted from our identification of opportunities to make improvements in manufacturing, customer service, information technology, administrative functions and customer and
distributor education to support the reorganization to a business unit structure.

 


36







Table of Contents


Severance, relocation and related costs were incurred for worldwide workforce reductions due to our
discontinuation of certain non-core products and infrastructure and process improvements associated with our productivity initiatives. The majority of these costs occurred in the United States, Japan and Europe. Net asset gains resulted from
disposals of long-lived assets from certain discontinued non-core products and relocation of certain facilities, offset by asset write-downs which resulted from the impairment and disposal of long-lived assets from the reduction in expected future
cash flows. The fair values of impaired assets were based on probability weighted expected cash flows as determined in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment
or Disposal of Long-lived Assets (“SFAS 144”).

The plan further called for increasing our investment in key growth
opportunities, specifically our refractive implant product line and international laser vision correction business, and accelerating the implementation of productivity initiatives.

STYLE="margin-top:12px;margin-bottom:0px; text-indent:4%">In 2006, we incurred $62.7 million of pre-tax charges, which included $16.3 million for inventory, manufacturing related and other charges included in
cost of sales, and $46.4 million included in operating expenses for severance, relocation and other one-time termination benefits of $13.7 million, productivity and brand repositioning costs of $37.6 million, offset by net asset disposal gains of
$2.8 million and a net credit from settlement of contractual obligations of $2.1 million. In 2005, we incurred $42.3 million in pre-tax charges which included $12.6 million for inventory related charges included in cost of sales, and $29.7 million
included in operating expenses for severance, relocation and other one-time termination benefits of $14.0 million, asset write-downs of $9.2 million, contractual obligations of $2.7 million and accelerated productivity and brand repositioning costs
of $3.8 million. The plan was completed in 2006. The cumulative charges incurred of $105.0 million were within the range previously announced.

2005 Product Rationalization and
Repositioning Plan

On October 31, 2005, our board of directors approved a product rationalization and repositioning plan covering
the discontinuation of non-strategic cataract surgical and eye care products and the elimination or redeployment of resources that support these product lines. The plan also included organizational changes and potential reductions in force in
manufacturing, sales and marketing associated with these product lines, as well as organizational changes in research and development and other corporate functions designed to align the organization with our strategy and strategic business unit
organization. Product rationalization covered the discontinuation of non-strategic cataract surgical and eye care products and the elimination or redeployment of resources that supported these product lines. This impacted the scope of our business
by eliminating future sales from discontinued products. Business repositioning covered changes in our business strategy and business unit organization. A key driver of the change was our acquisition of VISX in May 2005 which added laser vision
correction to our product portfolio. This action, along with other considerations, resulted in many changes, including the movement from a regional organizational structure to a global business unit structure focused by major product categories,
strategic and tactical alignment of our business units around common customers and distribution channels and how we market and sell our products to these customers. These changes necessitated organizational shifts as well as workforce reductions in
manufacturing, research and development and other corporate functions. Given all the above, the breadth and depth of these changes created a fundamental reorganization that affected the nature and focus of operations.

STYLE="margin-top:12px;margin-bottom:0px; text-indent:4%">We incurred charges for such items as organizational changes, brand repositioning, productivity initiatives and sales and marketing. Charges incurred for
organizational changes resulted from the reorganization of our management structure from a regional structure to a business unit structure. In connection with the change in management structure, we incurred costs to redefine our strategic planning
process, financial reporting processes, realignment and redeployment of customer support and administrative functions and related changes to the underlying infrastructure. Charges incurred for brand repositioning resulted from the reorganization to
a business unit structure. We incurred costs to implement a new strategy to link our various product offerings to common customers and distribution channels among our three business units which impacted the manner in which our business is conducted.
Charges incurred for productivity initiatives and sales and marketing resulted from our identification of opportunities to make improvements in manufacturing, customer service, information technology, administrative functions and customer and
distributor education to support the reorganization to a business unit structure.

 


36







Table of Contents


Severance, relocation and related costs were incurred for worldwide workforce reductions due to our
discontinuation of certain non-core products and infrastructure and process improvements associated with our productivity initiatives. The majority of these costs occurred in the United States, Japan and Europe. Net asset gains resulted from
disposals of long-lived assets from certain discontinued non-core products and relocation of certain facilities, offset by asset write-downs which resulted from the impairment and disposal of long-lived assets from the reduction in expected future
cash flows. The fair values of impaired assets were based on probability weighted expected cash flows as determined in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment
or Disposal of Long-lived Assets (“SFAS 144”).

The plan further called for increasing our investment in key growth
opportunities, specifically our refractive implant product line and international laser vision correction business, and accelerating the implementation of productivity initiatives.

STYLE="margin-top:12px;margin-bottom:0px; text-indent:4%">In 2006, we incurred $62.7 million of pre-tax charges, which included $16.3 million for inventory, manufacturing related and other charges included in
cost of sales, and $46.4 million included in operating expenses for severance, relocation and other one-time termination benefits of $13.7 million, productivity and brand repositioning costs of $37.6 million, offset by net asset disposal gains of
$2.8 million and a net credit from settlement of contractual obligations of $2.1 million. In 2005, we incurred $42.3 million in pre-tax charges which included $12.6 million for inventory related charges included in cost of sales, and $29.7 million
included in operating expenses for severance, relocation and other one-time termination benefits of $14.0 million, asset write-downs of $9.2 million, contractual obligations of $2.7 million and accelerated productivity and brand repositioning costs
of $3.8 million. The plan was completed in 2006. The cumulative charges incurred of $105.0 million were within the range previously announced.

These excerpts taken from the EYE 10-K filed Mar 3, 2008.

2005 Product Rationalization and Repositioning Plan

On October 31, 2005, our Board of Directors approved a product rationalization and repositioning plan covering the discontinuation of non-strategic cataract surgical and eye care products and the elimination or redeployment of resources that support these product lines. The plan also included organizational changes and potential reductions in force in manufacturing, sales and marketing associated with these product lines, as well as organizational changes in research and development and other corporate functions designed to align the organization with our strategy and strategic business unit organization. Product rationalization covered the discontinuation of non-strategic cataract surgical and eye care products and the elimination or redeployment of resources that supported these product lines. This impacted the scope of our business by eliminating future sales from discontinued products. Business repositioning covered changes in our business strategy and business unit organization. A key driver of the change was our acquisition of VISX in May 2005 which added laser vision correction to our product portfolio. This action, along with other considerations, resulted in many changes, including the movement from a regional organizational structure to a global business unit structure focused by major product categories, strategic and tactical alignment of our business units around common customers and distribution channels and how we market and sell our products to these customers. These changes necessitated organizational shifts as well as workforce reductions in manufacturing, research and development and other corporate functions. Given all the above, the breadth and depth of these changes created a fundamental reorganization that affected the nature and focus of operations.

We incurred charges for such items as organizational changes, brand repositioning, productivity initiatives and sales and marketing. Charges incurred for organizational changes resulted from the reorganization of our management structure from a regional structure to a business unit structure. In connection with the change in management structure, we incurred costs to redefine our strategic planning process, financial reporting processes, realignment and redeployment of customer support and administrative functions and related changes to the underlying infrastructure. Charges incurred for brand repositioning resulted from the reorganization to a business unit structure. We incurred costs to implement a new strategy to link our various product offerings to common customers and distribution channels among our three business units which impacted the manner in which our business is conducted. Charges incurred for productivity initiatives and sales and marketing resulted from our identification of opportunities to make improvements in manufacturing, customer service, information technology, administrative functions and customer and distributor education to support the reorganization to a business unit structure.

Severance, relocation and related costs were incurred for worldwide workforce reductions due to our discontinuation of certain non-core products and infrastructure and process improvements associated with our productivity initiatives. The majority of these costs occurred in the United States, Japan and Europe. Net asset gains resulted from disposals of long-lived assets from certain discontinued non-core products and relocation of certain facilities, offset by asset write-downs which resulted from the impairment and disposal of long-lived assets from the reduction in expected future cash flows. The fair values of impaired assets were based on probability weighted expected cash flows as determined in accordance with SFAS 144.

The plan further called for increasing our investment in key growth opportunities, specifically our refractive implant product line and international laser vision correction business, and accelerating the implementation of productivity initiatives.

In 2006, we incurred $62.7 million of pre-tax charges, which included $16.3 million for inventory, manufacturing related and other charges included in cost of sales and $46.4 million included in operating expenses for severance, relocation and other one-time termination benefits of $13.7 million, productivity and brand repositioning costs of $37.6 million, offset by net asset disposal gains of $2.8 million and a net credit from settlement of contractual obligations of $2.1 million. In 2005, we incurred $42.3 million in pre-tax charges which included $12.6 million for inventory related charges included in cost of sales and $29.7 million included in operating expenses for severance, relocation and other one-time termination benefits of $14.0 million, asset write-downs of $9.2 million, contractual obligations of $2.7 million and accelerated productivity and brand repositioning costs of $3.8 million. The plan was completed in 2006. We do not expect to incur additional charges associated with this plan. The cumulative charges incurred of $105.0 million were within the range previously announced.

2005 Product Rationalization and Repositioning Plan

STYLE="margin-top:6px;margin-bottom:0px; text-indent:4%">On October 31, 2005, our Board of Directors approved a product rationalization and repositioning plan covering the discontinuation of non-strategic
cataract surgical and eye care products and the elimination or redeployment of resources that support these product lines. The plan also included organizational changes and potential reductions in force in manufacturing, sales and marketing
associated with these product lines, as well as organizational changes in research and development and other corporate functions designed to align the organization with our strategy and strategic business unit organization. Product rationalization
covered the discontinuation of non-strategic cataract surgical and eye care products and the elimination or redeployment of resources that supported these product lines. This impacted the scope of our business by eliminating future sales from
discontinued products. Business repositioning covered changes in our business strategy and business unit organization. A key driver of the change was our acquisition of VISX in May 2005 which added laser vision correction to our product portfolio.
This action, along with other considerations, resulted in many changes, including the movement from a regional organizational structure to a global business unit structure focused by major product categories, strategic and tactical alignment of our
business units around common customers and distribution channels and how we market and sell our products to these customers. These changes necessitated organizational shifts as well as workforce reductions in manufacturing, research and development
and other corporate functions. Given all the above, the breadth and depth of these changes created a fundamental reorganization that affected the nature and focus of operations.

STYLE="margin-top:12px;margin-bottom:0px; text-indent:4%">We incurred charges for such items as organizational changes, brand repositioning, productivity initiatives and sales and marketing. Charges incurred for
organizational changes resulted from the reorganization of our management structure from a regional structure to a business unit structure. In connection with the change in management structure, we incurred costs to redefine our strategic planning
process, financial reporting processes, realignment and redeployment of customer support and administrative functions and related changes to the underlying infrastructure. Charges incurred for brand repositioning resulted from the reorganization to
a business unit structure. We incurred costs to implement a new strategy to link our various product offerings to common customers and distribution channels among our three business units which impacted the manner in which our business is conducted.
Charges incurred for productivity initiatives and sales and marketing resulted from our identification of opportunities to make improvements in manufacturing, customer service, information technology, administrative functions and customer and
distributor education to support the reorganization to a business unit structure.

Severance, relocation and related costs were incurred
for worldwide workforce reductions due to our discontinuation of certain non-core products and infrastructure and process improvements associated with our productivity initiatives. The majority of these costs occurred in the United States, Japan and
Europe. Net asset gains resulted from disposals of long-lived assets from certain discontinued non-core products and relocation of certain facilities, offset by asset write-downs which resulted from the impairment and disposal of long-lived assets
from the reduction in expected future cash flows. The fair values of impaired assets were based on probability weighted expected cash flows as determined in accordance with SFAS 144.

STYLE="margin-top:12px;margin-bottom:0px; text-indent:4%">The plan further called for increasing our investment in key growth opportunities, specifically our refractive implant product line and international
laser vision correction business, and accelerating the implementation of productivity initiatives.

In 2006, we incurred $62.7 million of
pre-tax charges, which included $16.3 million for inventory, manufacturing related and other charges included in cost of sales and $46.4 million included in operating expenses for severance, relocation and other one-time termination benefits of
$13.7 million, productivity and brand repositioning costs of $37.6 million, offset by net asset disposal gains of $2.8 million and a net credit from settlement of contractual obligations of $2.1 million. In 2005, we incurred $42.3 million in pre-tax
charges which included $12.6 million for inventory related charges included in cost of sales and $29.7 million included in operating expenses for severance, relocation and other one-time termination benefits of $14.0 million, asset write-downs of
$9.2 million, contractual obligations of $2.7 million and accelerated productivity and brand repositioning costs of $3.8 million. The plan was completed in 2006. We do not expect to incur additional charges associated with this plan. The cumulative
charges incurred of $105.0 million were within the range previously announced.

This excerpt taken from the EYE 10-K filed Mar 1, 2007.

Product Rationalization and Repositioning Plan

On October 31, 2005, our Board of Directors approved a product rationalization and repositioning plan covering the discontinuation of non-strategic cataract surgical and eye care products and the elimination or redeployment of resources that support these product lines. The plan also included organizational changes and potential reductions in force in manufacturing, sales and marketing associated with these product lines, as well as organizational changes in research and development and other corporate functions designed to align the organization with our strategy and strategic business unit organization.

The plan further called for increasing our investment in key growth opportunities, specifically our refractive implant product line and international laser vision correction business, and accelerating the implementation of productivity initiatives.

In 2006, we incurred $62.7 million of pre-tax charges, which included $16.3 million for inventory, manufacturing related and other charges included in cost of sales and $46.4 million included in operating expenses for severance, relocation and other one-time termination benefits of $13.7 million, productivity and brand repositioning costs of $37.6 million, offset by net asset disposal gains of $2.8 million and a net credit from settlement of contractual obligations of $2.1 million.  In 2005, we incurred $42.3 million in pre-tax charges which included $12.6 million for inventory related charges included in cost of sales and $29.7 million included in operating expenses for severance, relocation and other one-time termination benefits of $14.0 million, asset write-downs of $9.2 million, contractual obligations of $2.7 million and accelerated productivity and brand repositioning costs of $3.8 million.  We do not expect to incur additional charges associated with this plan.  The cumulative charges incurred of $105.0 million were within the range previously announced.

This excerpt taken from the EYE 10-Q filed Nov 8, 2006.

Product Rationalization and Repositioning Plan

On October 31, 2005, our Board of Directors approved a product rationalization and repositioning plan covering the discontinuation of non-strategic cataract surgical and eye care products and the elimination or redeployment of resources that support these product lines. The plan also includes organizational changes and potential reductions in force in manufacturing, sales and marketing associated with these product lines, as well as organizational changes in research and development and other corporate functions designed to align the organization with our strategy and strategic business unit organization. A substantial portion of expected operating cost benefits will result from reductions in force and associated annualized employee compensation of approximately $17.9 million.

The plan further calls for increasing our investment in key growth opportunities, specifically our refractive implant product line and international laser vision correction business, and accelerating the implementation of productivity initiatives.

In the three months ended September 29, 2006, we incurred $4.0 million of pre-tax charges, which included $4.5 million for inventory, manufacturing related and other charges included in cost of sales and net credit of $0.5 million included in operating expenses. The net credit included in operating expenses comprised severance, relocation and other one-time termination benefits of $0.2 million and productivity and brand repositioning costs of $6.5 million, offset by net asset disposal gains of $4.9 million and a net credit from settlement of a contractual obligation of $2.3 million.  In the nine months ended September 29, 2006, we incurred $61.5 million of pre-tax charges, which included $15.1 million for inventory, manufacturing related and other charges included in cost of sales and $46.4 million included in operating expenses. Charges included in operating expenses comprised productivity and brand repositioning costs of $37.6 million and  severance, relocation and other one-time termination benefits of $13.7  million, offset by net asset disposal gains of $2.8 million and a net credit from settlement of contractual obligations of $2.1 million.

Following an analysis of our IOL manufacturing capabilities in the second quarter of 2006, we decided to consolidate certain operations. In addition, we expanded the scope of our eye care rationalization initiatives in order to maximize manufacturing capacity and seize growth opportunities. Together, these separate actions are expected to result in additional charges of approximately $25 million in 2006.  When combined with the initial estimated charges of $70 million to $80

20




million, the estimated total charges for the expanded product rationalization and repositioning plan will be approximately $105 million.  Through September 29, 2006, we incurred cumulative charges of $103.8 million.  We expect to incur additional charges of approximately $1.2 million in the fourth quarter of 2006 in connection with the consolidation of our IOL manufacturing capabilities.

Certain foreign jurisdictions have laws and regulations which require consultations and negotiations with works councils, labor organizations and local authorities. The outcome of these discussions will determine, in part, the restructuring steps to be implemented and the associated cost. Therefore, the final costs of the business repositioning plan may be different from our initial estimates.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES

The preparation of consolidated financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make judgments, assumptions and estimates that affect the amounts reported. Certain of these significant accounting policies are considered to be critical accounting policies, as defined below.

A critical accounting policy is defined as one that is both material to the presentation of AMO’s consolidated financial statements and requires management to make difficult, subjective or complex judgments that could have a material effect on AMO’s financial condition or results of operations. Specifically, these policies have the following attributes: (1) AMO is required to make assumptions about matters that are highly uncertain at the time of the estimate; and (2) different estimates AMO could reasonably have used, or changes in the estimate that are reasonably likely to occur, would have a material effect on AMO’s financial condition or results of operations.

Estimates and assumptions about future events and their effects cannot be determined with certainty. AMO bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions believed to be applicable and reasonable under the circumstances. These estimates may change as new events occur, as additional information is obtained and as AMO’s operating environment changes. These changes have historically been minor and have been included in the consolidated financial statements as soon as they became known. In addition, management is periodically faced with uncertainties, the outcomes of which are not within its control and will not be known for prolonged periods of time. These uncertainties are discussed in the section of our 2005 Form 10-K entitled “Risk Factors” and the section below entitled “Certain Factors and Trends Affecting AMO and Its Businesses.” Based on a critical assessment of its accounting policies and the underlying judgments and uncertainties affecting the application of those policies, management believes that AMO’s consolidated financial statements are fairly stated in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and provide a meaningful presentation of AMO’s financial condition and results of operations.

This excerpt taken from the EYE 10-Q filed Aug 9, 2006.

Product Rationalization and Repositioning Plan

On October 31, 2005, our Board of Directors approved a product rationalization and repositioning plan covering the discontinuation of non-strategic cataract surgical and eye care products and the elimination or redeployment of resources that support these product lines. The plan also includes organizational changes and potential reductions in force in manufacturing, sales and marketing associated with these product lines, as well as organizational changes in research and development and other corporate functions designed to align the organization with our strategy and strategic business unit organization. A substantial portion of expected operating cost benefits will result from reductions in force and associated annualized employee compensation of approximately $17.9 million.

The plan further calls for increasing our investment in key growth opportunities, specifically our refractive implant product line and international laser vision correction business, and accelerating the implementation of productivity initiatives.

In the three months ended June 30, 2006, we incurred $25.1 million of pre-tax charges, which included $7.4 million for inventory, manufacturing related and other charges included in cost of sales and $17.7 million included in operating expenses. Charges included in operating expenses comprised severance, relocation and other one-time termination benefits of $11.9 million, productivity and brand repositioning costs of $4.9 million, asset write-downs of $0.7 million and contractual obligations of $0.2 million. In the six months ended June 30, 2006, we incurred $54.6 million of pre-tax charges, which included $7.6 million for inventory and manufacturing related charges included in cost of sales and $47.0 million included in operating expenses. Charges included in operating expenses comprised productivity and brand repositioning costs of $31.1 million, severance, relocation and other one-time termination benefits of $13.5 million, asset write-downs of $2.1 million and contractual obligations of $0.3 million.

Following an analysis of our IOL manufacturing capabilities in the second quarter of 2006, we have decided to consolidate certain operations. In addition, we expanded the scope of our eye care rationalization initiatives in order to maximize manufacturing capacity and seize growth opportunities. Together, these separate actions are expected to result in additional charges of approximately $20 million to $25 million in 2006.  When combined with the initial estimated charges of $70 million to $80 million, the estimated total charges for the expanded product rationalization and repositioning plan will be approximately $105 million.  Through June 30, 2006, we incurred cumulative charges of $99.8 million.  We expect to incur additional charges of approximately $5 million in the remainder of 2006.

19




 

Certain foreign jurisdictions have laws and regulations which require consultations and negotiations with works councils, labor organizations and local authorities. The outcome of these discussions will determine, in part, the restructuring steps to be implemented and the associated cost. Therefore, the final costs of the business repositioning plan may be significantly different from our initial estimates.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES

The preparation of consolidated financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make judgments, assumptions and estimates that affect the amounts reported. Certain of these significant accounting policies are considered to be critical accounting policies, as defined below.

A critical accounting policy is defined as one that is both material to the presentation of AMO’s consolidated financial statements and requires management to make difficult, subjective or complex judgments that could have a material effect on AMO’s financial condition or results of operations. Specifically, these policies have the following attributes: (1) AMO is required to make assumptions about matters that are highly uncertain at the time of the estimate; and (2) different estimates AMO could reasonably have used, or changes in the estimate that are reasonably likely to occur, would have a material effect on AMO’s financial condition or results of operations.

Estimates and assumptions about future events and their effects cannot be determined with certainty. AMO bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions believed to be applicable and reasonable under the circumstances. These estimates may change as new events occur, as additional information is obtained and as AMO’s operating environment changes. These changes have historically been minor and have been included in the consolidated financial statements as soon as they became known. In addition, management is periodically faced with uncertainties, the outcomes of which are not within its control and will not be known for prolonged periods of time. These uncertainties are discussed in the section of our 2005 Form 10-K entitled “Risk Factors” and the section below entitled “Certain Factors and Trends Affecting AMO and Its Businesses.” Based on a critical assessment of its accounting policies and the underlying judgments and uncertainties affecting the application of those policies, management believes that AMO’s consolidated financial statements are fairly stated in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and provide a meaningful presentation of AMO’s financial condition and results of operations.

This excerpt taken from the EYE 8-K filed Jun 6, 2006.

Product Rationalization and Repositioning Plan

On October 31, 2005, our Board of Directors approved a product rationalization and repositioning plan covering the discontinuation of non-strategic cataract surgical and eye care products and the elimination or redeployment of resources that support these product lines. The plan also includes organizational changes and potential reductions in force in manufacturing, sales and marketing associated with these product lines, as well as organizational changes in research and development and other corporate functions designed to align the organization with our strategy and strategic business unit organization. A substantial portion of expected operating cost benefits will result from reductions in force and associated annualized employee compensation of approximately $14.2 million.

The plan further calls for increasing our investment in key growth opportunities, specifically our refractive implant product line and international laser vision correction business, and accelerating the implementation of productivity initiatives.

In the fourth quarter of 2005, we incurred $42.3 million of pre-tax charges, which included $12.6 million for inventory related charges included in cost of sales and $29.7 million included in operating expenses for severance, relocation and other one-time termination benefits of $14.0 million, asset write-downs of $9.2 million, contractual obligations of $2.7 million and accelerated productivity and brand repositioning costs of $3.8 million. We expect to incur an additional $28 million to $38 million of charges in the first half of 2006, which will be recognized as the services are performed and actions occur. The total charges that are expected to be incurred are within the range previously announced.


Certain foreign jurisdictions have laws and regulations which require consultations and negotiations with works councils, labor organizations and local authorities. The outcome of these discussions will determine, in part, the restructuring steps to be implemented and the associated cost. Therefore, the final costs of the business repositioning plan may be significantly different from our initial estimates.

This excerpt taken from the EYE 10-Q filed May 10, 2006.

Product Rationalization and Repositioning Plan

 

On October 31, 2005, our Board of Directors approved a product rationalization and repositioning plan covering the discontinuation of non-strategic cataract surgical and eye care products and the elimination or redeployment of resources that support these product lines. The plan also includes organizational changes and potential reductions in force in manufacturing, sales and marketing associated with these product lines, as well as organizational changes in research and development and other corporate functions designed to align the organization with our strategy and strategic business unit organization. A substantial portion of expected operating cost benefits will result from reductions in force and associated annualized employee compensation of approximately $14.2 million.

 

The plan further calls for increasing our investment in key growth opportunities, specifically our refractive implant product line and international laser vision correction business, and accelerating the implementation of productivity initiatives.

 

In the first quarter of 2006, we incurred $32.4 million of pre-tax charges, which included $3.2 million for inventory and manufacturing related charges included in cost of sales and $29.2 million included in operating expenses. Charges included in operating expenses comprised productivity and brand repositioning costs of $26.2 million, severance, relocation and other one-time termination benefits of $1.6 million and  asset write-downs of $1.4 million. In connection with the approved product rationalization and repositioning plan, we expect to incur an additional $3 million to $5 million of charges in the second quarter of 2006, which will be recognized as the services are performed and actions occur. The total charges that are expected to be incurred are within the range previously announced.

 

Following an analysis of our IOL manufacturing capabilities, we have decided to consolidate certain operations. In addition, we have decided to further expand the scope of our eye care rationalization initiatives in order to maximize manufacturing capacity and seize growth opportunities. Together, these separate actions are expected to result in additional charges of approximately $20 million to $25 million in the remainder of 2006. The estimated total charges for the expanded product rationalization and repositioning plan will be approximately $90 million to $105 million.

 

Certain foreign jurisdictions have laws and regulations which require consultations and negotiations with works councils, labor organizations and local authorities. The outcome of these discussions will determine, in part, the restructuring

 

18



 

steps to be implemented and the associated cost. Therefore, the final costs of the business repositioning plan may be significantly different from our initial estimates.

 

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES

 

The preparation of consolidated financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make judgments, assumptions and estimates that affect the amounts reported. Certain of these significant accounting policies are considered to be critical accounting policies, as defined below.

 

A critical accounting policy is defined as one that is both material to the presentation of AMO’s consolidated financial statements and requires management to make difficult, subjective or complex judgments that could have a material effect on AMO’s financial condition or results of operations. Specifically, these policies have the following attributes: (1) AMO is required to make assumptions about matters that are highly uncertain at the time of the estimate; and (2) different estimates AMO could reasonably have used, or changes in the estimate that are reasonably likely to occur, would have a material effect on AMO’s financial condition or results of operations.

 

Estimates and assumptions about future events and their effects cannot be determined with certainty. AMO bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions believed to be applicable and reasonable under the circumstances. These estimates may change as new events occur, as additional information is obtained and as AMO’s operating environment changes. These changes have historically been minor and have been included in the consolidated financial statements as soon as they became known. In addition, management is periodically faced with uncertainties, the outcomes of which are not within its control and will not be known for prolonged periods of time. These uncertainties are discussed in the section of our 2005 Form 10-K entitled “Risk Factors” and the section below entitled “Certain Factors and Trends Affecting AMO and Its Businesses.” Based on a critical assessment of its accounting policies and the underlying judgments and uncertainties affecting the application of those policies, management believes that AMO’s consolidated financial statements are fairly stated in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and provide a meaningful presentation of AMO’s financial condition and results of operations.

 

This excerpt taken from the EYE 10-K filed Mar 14, 2006.

Product Rationalization and Repositioning Plan

 

On October 31, 2005, our Board of Directors approved a product rationalization and repositioning plan covering the discontinuation of non-strategic cataract surgical and eye care products and the elimination or redeployment of resources that support these product lines. The plan also includes organizational changes and potential reductions in force in manufacturing, sales and marketing associated with these product lines, as well as organizational changes in research and development and other corporate functions designed to align the organization with our strategy and strategic business unit organization. A substantial portion of expected operating cost benefits will result from reductions in force and associated annualized employee compensation of approximately $14.2 million.

 

The plan further calls for increasing our investment in key growth opportunities, specifically our refractive implant product line and international laser vision correction business, and accelerating the implementation of productivity initiatives.

 

In the fourth quarter of 2005, we incurred $42.3 million of pre-tax charges, which included $12.6 million for inventory related charges included in cost of sales and $29.7 million included in operating expenses for severance, relocation and other one-time termination benefits of $14.0 million, asset write-downs of $9.2 million, contractual obligations of $2.7 million and accelerated productivity and brand repositioning costs of $3.8 million. We expect to incur an additional $28 million to $38 million of charges in the first half of 2006, which will be recognized as the services are performed and actions occur. The total charges that are expected to be incurred are within the range previously announced.

 

Certain foreign jurisdictions have laws and regulations which require consultations and negotiations with works councils, labor organizations and local authorities. The outcome of these discussions will determine, in part, the restructuring steps to be implemented and the associated cost. Therefore, the final costs of the business repositioning plan may be significantly different from our initial estimates.

 

30



 

This excerpt taken from the EYE 10-Q filed Nov 8, 2005.

Product Rationalization and Repositioning Plan

 

On October 31, 2005, our Board of Directors approved a product rationalization and repositioning plan covering the discontinuation of non-strategic cataract surgical and eye care products and the elimination or redeployment of resources that support these product lines. The plan also includes organizational changes and potential reductions in force in manufacturing, sales and marketing associated with these product lines, as well as organizational changes in research and development and other corporate functions designed to align the organization with our strategy and strategic business unit organization.

 

The plan further calls for increasing our investment in key growth opportunities, specifically our refractive implant product line and international laser vision correction business, and accelerating the implementation of productivity initiatives.

 

Certain foreign jurisdictions have laws and regulations which require consultations and negotiations with works councils, labor organizations and local authorities. The outcome of these discussions will determine, in part, the restructuring steps to be implemented and the associated cost. Therefore, the final costs of the business repositioning plan may be significantly different from our initial estimates.

 

We expect to incur business repositioning charges for restructuring actions relating to severance, relocation and other one-time termination benefits, inventory and other asset write-offs, incremental costs for transition and implementation activities and contract terminations. We currently estimate that the non-recurring pre-tax charges resulting from the business repositioning will be in the range of $70 to $80 million, of which $43 million to $48 million are expected to be cash expenditures. Charges associated with this plan are expected to be incurred primarily in the fourth quarter of 2005 and the first half of 2006. We expect to complete these activities in 2006.

 

Business repositioning charges for severance, relocation and other one-time termination benefits are estimated to be in the range of $18 million to $20 million. The associated workforce reduction activities and related charges are expected to begin

 

19


Table of Contents

in the fourth quarter of 2005 and be completed in the first half of 2006. As noted above, the final costs of the business repositioning plan will be impacted by the outcome of the discussions and negotiations with works council, labor organizations and local authorities.

 

Estimated charges for inventory and other asset write-offs are expected to be in the range of $27 million to $32 million. These estimated charges are primarily for excess inventory, product returns, leasehold improvements and related assets at impacted facilities and other asset write-offs. These charges are expected to be recognized primarily in the fourth quarter of 2005 and continue through the first half of 2006.

 

Incremental costs for transition and implementation activities to accelerate manufacturing and operational productivity and product and brand repositioning activities are estimated to be in the range of $21 million to $23 million. These costs will be recognized as the related services and actions occur over the course of the next several quarters through the first half of 2006.

 

Restructuring charges for contract terminations, primarily for leases and purchase commitments, are estimated to be in the range of $4 million to $5 million and will be recognized primarily in the fourth quarter of 2005.

 

Wikinvest © 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012. Use of this site is subject to express Terms of Service, Privacy Policy, and Disclaimer. By continuing past this page, you agree to abide by these terms. Any information provided by Wikinvest, including but not limited to company data, competitors, business analysis, market share, sales revenues and other operating metrics, earnings call analysis, conference call transcripts, industry information, or price targets should not be construed as research, trading tips or recommendations, or investment advice and is provided with no warrants as to its accuracy. Stock market data, including US and International equity symbols, stock quotes, share prices, earnings ratios, and other fundamental data is provided by data partners. Stock market quotes delayed at least 15 minutes for NASDAQ, 20 mins for NYSE and AMEX. Market data by Xignite. See data providers for more details. Company names, products, services and branding cited herein may be trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners. The use of trademarks or service marks of another is not a representation that the other is affiliated with, sponsors, is sponsored by, endorses, or is endorsed by Wikinvest.
Powered by MediaWiki