|
|
 | | | |
- close
- close
- close
- close
| |||||||||
This excerpt taken from the EYE 10-Q filed May 10, 2006. Sovereign phacoemulsification systems and replacement
cassettes infringe the patents. Alcon is seeking damages and a permanent
injunction. At Alcon’s request, the case has been stayed in Texas while the
parties seek re-examination by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office on the
Haines Patents in light of another patent we allege invalidates the Haines
Patents.
On January 4, 2005, Dr. James Nielsen filed a complaint against us and Allergan, Inc. in the U.S. District Court of the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division, for infringement of U.S. Patent No. 5,158,572. Dr. Nielsen alleges that our This excerpt taken from the EYE 10-K filed Mar 14, 2006. Sovereign phacoemulsification systems and
replacement cassettes infringe the patents. Alcon is seeking damages and a
permanent injunction. At Alcon’s request, the case has been stayed in Texas
while the parties seek re-examination by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
on the Haines Patents in light of another patent the Company alleges
invalidates the Haines Patents.
On January 4, 2005, Dr. James Nielsen filed a complaint against the Company and Allergan, Inc. in the U.S. District Court of the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division, for infringement of U.S. Patent No. 5,158,572. Dr. Nielsen alleges that the Company’s | EXCERPTS ON THIS PAGE:
RELATED TOPICS for EYE: |
| |||||||
