|
|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
AYR » Topics » We operate in a highly competitive market for investment opportunities in aviation assets and for the leasing of aircraft.These excerpts taken from the AYR 10-K filed Mar 2, 2009. We
operate in a highly competitive market for investment
opportunities in aviation assets and for the leasing of
aircraft.
A number of entities compete with us to make the types of
investments that we plan to make. We compete with public
partnerships, investors and funds, commercial and investment
banks and commercial finance companies with respect to our
investments in debt investments. We compete with other operating
lessors, airlines, aircraft manufacturers, financial
institutions (including those seeking to dispose of repossessed
aircraft at distressed prices), aircraft brokers and other
investors with respect to aircraft acquisitions and aircraft
leasing. The aircraft leasing industry is highly competitive and
may be divided into three basic activities: (i) aircraft
acquisition, (ii) leasing or re-leasing of aircraft, and
(iii) aircraft sales. Competition varies among these three
basic activities. Currently, our competition is comprised of
aircraft leasing companies, including GE Commercial Aviation
Services, International Lease Finance Corp., CIT Group, AerCap
Holdings NV, Aviation Capital Group, Macquarie Aircraft Leasing,
RBS Aviation Capital, AWAS, Babcock & Brown Air Ltd.,
Genesis Lease Limited, Allco, BOC Aviation and airlines.
Several of our competitors are substantially larger and have
considerably greater financial, technical and marketing
resources than we do. Some competitors may have a lower cost of
funds and access to funding sources that are not available to
us. In addition, some of our competitors may have higher risk
tolerances or different risk assessments, which could allow them
to consider a wider variety of investments, establish more
relationships than us, bid more aggressively on aviation assets
available for sale and offer lower lease rates than us. For
instance, we may not be able to grant privileged rental rates to
airlines in return for equity investments or debt financings in
order to lease aircraft and minimize the number of aircraft off
lease (unless such equity investments or debt financings are in
connection with the bankruptcy, reorganization or similar
process of a lessee in settlement of expected or already
delinquent obligations, as permitted under the terms of certain
of our financings). Certain of our competitors, however, may
enter into similar arrangements with troubled lessees to
restructure the obligations of those lessees while maximizing
the number of aircraft remaining on viable leases to such
lessees and minimizing their overall cost. Such disparity could
make our acquisitions more costly, and impair our ability to
effectively compete in the marketplace, maximize our revenues
and grow our business. In addition, some competitors may provide
financial services, maintenance services or other inducements to
potential lessees that we cannot provide. As a result of
competitive pressures, we may not be able to take advantage of
attractive investment opportunities from time to time, and we
may not be able to identify and make investments that are
consistent with our investment objectives. Additionally, we may
not be able to compete effectively against present and future
competitors in the aircraft leasing market or aircraft sales
market. The competitive pressures we face may have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results
of operations.
Table of Contents
We operate in a highly competitive market for investment opportunities in aviation assets and for the leasing of aircraft. A number of entities compete with us to make the types of investments that we plan to make. We compete with public partnerships, investors and funds, commercial and investment banks and commercial finance companies with respect to our investments in debt investments. We compete with other operating lessors, airlines, aircraft manufacturers, financial institutions (including those seeking to dispose of repossessed aircraft at distressed prices), aircraft brokers and other investors with respect to aircraft acquisitions and aircraft leasing. The aircraft leasing industry is highly competitive and may be divided into three basic activities: (i) aircraft acquisition, (ii) leasing or re-leasing of aircraft, and (iii) aircraft sales. Competition varies among these three basic activities. Currently, our competition is comprised of aircraft leasing companies, including GE Commercial Aviation Services, International Lease Finance Corp., CIT Group, AerCap Holdings NV, Aviation Capital Group, Macquarie Aircraft Leasing, RBS Aviation Capital, AWAS, Babcock & Brown Air Ltd., Genesis Lease Limited, Allco, BOC Aviation and airlines. Several of our competitors are substantially larger and have considerably greater financial, technical and marketing resources than we do. Some competitors may have a lower cost of funds and access to funding sources that are not available to us. In addition, some of our competitors may have higher risk tolerances or different risk assessments, which could allow them to consider a wider variety of investments, establish more relationships than us, bid more aggressively on aviation assets available for sale and offer lower lease rates than us. For instance, we may not be able to grant privileged rental rates to airlines in return for equity investments or debt financings in order to lease aircraft and minimize the number of aircraft off lease (unless such equity investments or debt financings are in connection with the bankruptcy, reorganization or similar process of a lessee in settlement of expected or already delinquent obligations, as permitted under the terms of certain of our financings). Certain of our competitors, however, may enter into similar arrangements with troubled lessees to restructure the obligations of those lessees while maximizing the number of aircraft remaining on viable leases to such lessees and minimizing their overall cost. Such disparity could make our acquisitions more costly, and impair our ability to effectively compete in the marketplace, maximize our revenues and grow our business. In addition, some competitors may provide financial services, maintenance services or other inducements to potential lessees that we cannot provide. As a result of competitive pressures, we may not be able to take advantage of attractive investment opportunities from time to time, and we may not be able to identify and make investments that are consistent with our investment objectives. Additionally, we may not be able to compete effectively against present and future competitors in the aircraft leasing market or aircraft sales market. The competitive pressures we face may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Table of ContentsThis excerpt taken from the AYR 10-Q filed Nov 17, 2008. We
operate in a highly competitive market for investment
opportunities in aviation assets and for the leasing of
aircraft.
A number of entities compete with us to make the types of
investments that we plan to make. We compete with public
partnerships, investors and funds, commercial and investment
banks and commercial finance companies with respect to our
investments in debt investments. We compete with other operating
lessors, airlines, aircraft manufacturers, financial
institutions (including those seeking to dispose of repossessed
aircraft at distressed prices), aircraft brokers and other
investors with respect to aircraft acquisitions and aircraft
leasing. The aircraft leasing industry is highly competitive and
may be divided into three basic activities: (i) aircraft
acquisition, (ii) leasing or re-leasing of aircraft, and
(iii) aircraft sales. Competition varies among these three
basic activities. Currently, our competition is comprised of
aircraft leasing companies, including GE Commercial Aviation
Services, International Lease Finance Corp., CIT Group, AerCap,
Aviation Capital Group, Macquarie Aircraft Leasing,
RBS Aviation Capital, AWAS, Babcock & Brown and
BOC Aviation (formerly Singapore Aircraft Leasing Enterprise)
and airlines.
Several of our competitors are substantially larger and have
considerably greater financial, technical and marketing
resources than we do. Some competitors may have a lower cost of
funds and
Table of Contents
access to funding sources that are not available to us. In
addition, some of our competitors may have higher risk
tolerances or different risk assessments, which could allow them
to consider a wider variety of investments, establish more
relationships than us, and bid more aggressively on aviation
assets available for sale and offer lower lease rates than us.
For instance, we may not be able to grant privileged rental
rates to airlines in return for equity investments or debt
financings in order to lease aircraft and minimize the number of
aircraft off lease (unless such equity investments or debt
financings are in connection with the bankruptcy, reorganization
or similar process of a lessee in settlement of expected or
already delinquent obligations, as permitted under the terms of
certain of our credit facilities). Certain of our competitors,
however, may enter into similar arrangements with troubled
lessees to restructure the obligations of those lessees while
maximizing the number of aircraft remaining on viable leases to
such lessees and minimizing their overall cost. Such disparity
could make our acquisitions more costly, and impair our ability
to effectively compete in the marketplace, maximize our revenues
and grow our business. In addition, some competitors may provide
financial services, maintenance services or other inducements to
potential lessees that we cannot provide. As a result of
competitive pressures, we may not be able to take advantage of
attractive investment opportunities from time to time, and we
may not be able to identify and make investments that are
consistent with our investment objectives. Additionally, we may
not be able to compete effectively against present and future
competitors in the aircraft leasing market or aircraft sales
market. The competitive pressures we face may have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results
of operations.
| EXCERPTS ON THIS PAGE:
|
| |||||||