AYR » Topics » If we were treated as engaged in a trade or business in the United States, we would be subject to U.S. federal income taxation on a net income basis, which would adversely affect our business and result in decreased cash available for distribution to our

These excerpts taken from the AYR 10-K filed Mar 2, 2009.
If AL were treated as engaged in a trade or business in the United States, AL would be subject to U.S. federal income taxation on a net income basis, which would adversely affect our business and result in decreased cash available for distribution to our shareholders.
 
If, contrary to expectations, AL were treated as engaged in a trade or business in the United States, the portion of its net income, if any, that was “effectively connected” with such trade or business would be subject to U.S. federal income taxation at a maximum rate of 35%. In addition, AL would be subject to the U.S. federal branch profits tax on its effectively connected earnings and profits at a rate of 30%. The imposition of such taxes would adversely affect AL’s business and would result in decreased cash available for distribution to our shareholders.
 
If there is not sufficient trading in our shares, or if 50% of our shares are held by certain 5% shareholders, we could lose our eligibility for an exemption from U.S. federal income taxation on rental income from our aircraft used in “international traffic” and could be subject to U.S. federal income taxation which would adversely affect our business and result in decreased cash available for distribution to our shareholders.
 
We expect that we are currently eligible for an exemption under Section 883 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) which provides an exemption from U.S. federal income taxation with respect to rental income derived from aircraft used in international traffic, by certain foreign corporation. No assurances can be given that we will continue to be eligible for this exemption as our stock is traded on the market and changes in our ownership or the amount of our shares that are traded could cause us to cease to be eligible for such exemption. To qualify for this exemption in respect of rental income, the lessor of the aircraft must be organized in a country that grants a comparable exemption to U.S. lessors (Bermuda and Ireland each do), and certain other requirements must be satisfied. We can satisfy these requirements in any year if, for more than half the days of such year, our shares are primarily and regularly traded on a recognized exchange and certain shareholders, each of whom owns 5% or more of our shares (applying certain attribution rules), do not collectively own more than 50% of our shares. Our shares will be considered to be primarily and regularly traded on a recognized exchange in any year if: (1) the number of trades in our shares effected on such recognized stock exchanges exceed the number of our shares (or direct interests in our shares) that are traded during the year on all securities markets; (2) trades in our shares are effected on such stock exchanges in more than de minimis quantities on at least 60 days during every calendar quarter in the year; and (3) the aggregate number of our shares traded on such stock exchanges during the taxable year is at least 10% of the average number of our shares outstanding in that class during that year. If our shares cease to


35


Table of Contents

satisfy these requirements, then we may no longer be eligible for the Section 883 exemption with respect to rental income earned by aircraft used in international traffic. If we were not eligible for the exemption under Section 883 of the Code, we expect that the U.S. source rental income of Aircastle Bermuda generally would be subject to U.S. federal taxation, on a gross income basis, at a rate of not in excess of 4% as provided in Section 887 of the Code. If, contrary to expectations, Aircastle Bermuda did not comply with certain administrative guidelines of the Internal Revenue Service, such that 90% or more of Aircastle Bermuda’s U.S. source rental income were attributable to the activities of personnel based in the United States, Aircastle Bermuda’s U.S. source rental income would be treated as income effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business in the United States. In such case, Aircastle Bermuda’s U.S. source rental income would be subject to U.S. federal income taxation on its net income at a maximum rate of 35% as well as state and local taxation. In addition, Aircastle Bermuda would be subject to the U.S. federal branch profits tax on its effectively connected earnings and profits at a rate of 30%. The imposition of such taxes would adversely affect our business and would result in decreased cash available for distribution to our shareholders.
 
If AL
were treated as engaged in a trade or business in the United
States, AL would be subject to U.S. federal income taxation
on a net income basis, which would adversely affect our business
and result in decreased cash available for distribution to our
shareholders.



 



If, contrary to expectations, AL were treated as engaged in a
trade or business in the United States, the portion of its net
income, if any, that was “effectively connected” with
such trade or business would be subject to U.S. federal
income taxation at a maximum rate of 35%. In addition, AL would
be subject to the U.S. federal branch profits tax on its
effectively connected earnings and profits at a rate of 30%. The
imposition of such taxes would adversely affect AL’s
business and would result in decreased cash available for
distribution to our shareholders.


 




If
there is not sufficient trading in our shares, or if 50% of our
shares are held by certain 5% shareholders, we could lose our
eligibility for an exemption from U.S. federal income taxation
on rental income from our aircraft used in “international
traffic” and could be subject to U.S. federal income
taxation which would adversely affect our business and result in
decreased cash available for distribution to our
shareholders.



 



We expect that we are currently eligible for an exemption under
Section 883 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended (the “Code”) which provides an exemption from
U.S. federal income taxation with respect to rental income
derived from aircraft used in international traffic, by certain
foreign corporation. No assurances can be given that we will
continue to be eligible for this exemption as our stock is
traded on the market and changes in our ownership or the amount
of our shares that are traded could cause us to cease to be
eligible for such exemption. To qualify for this exemption in
respect of rental income, the lessor of the aircraft must be
organized in a country that grants a comparable exemption to
U.S. lessors (Bermuda and Ireland each do), and certain
other requirements must be satisfied. We can satisfy these
requirements in any year if, for more than half the days of such
year, our shares are primarily and regularly traded on a
recognized exchange and certain shareholders, each of whom owns
5% or more of our shares (applying certain attribution rules),
do not collectively own more than 50% of our shares. Our shares
will be considered to be primarily and regularly traded on a
recognized exchange in any year if: (1) the number of
trades in our shares effected on such recognized stock exchanges
exceed the number of our shares (or direct interests in our
shares) that are traded during the year on all securities
markets; (2) trades in our shares are effected on such
stock exchanges in more than de minimis quantities on at least
60 days during every calendar quarter in the year; and
(3) the aggregate number of our shares traded on such stock
exchanges during the taxable year is at least 10% of the average
number of our shares outstanding in that class during that year.
If our shares cease to





35





Table of Contents






satisfy these requirements, then we may no longer be eligible
for the Section 883 exemption with respect to rental income
earned by aircraft used in international traffic. If we were not
eligible for the exemption under Section 883 of the Code,
we expect that the U.S. source rental income of Aircastle
Bermuda generally would be subject to U.S. federal
taxation, on a gross income basis, at a rate of not in excess of
4% as provided in Section 887 of the Code. If, contrary to
expectations, Aircastle Bermuda did not comply with certain
administrative guidelines of the Internal Revenue Service, such
that 90% or more of Aircastle Bermuda’s U.S. source
rental income were attributable to the activities of personnel
based in the United States, Aircastle Bermuda’s
U.S. source rental income would be treated as income
effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business in
the United States. In such case, Aircastle Bermuda’s
U.S. source rental income would be subject to
U.S. federal income taxation on its net income at a maximum
rate of 35% as well as state and local taxation. In addition,
Aircastle Bermuda would be subject to the U.S. federal
branch profits tax on its effectively connected earnings and
profits at a rate of 30%. The imposition of such taxes would
adversely affect our business and would result in decreased cash
available for distribution to our shareholders.


 




This excerpt taken from the AYR 10-Q filed Nov 17, 2008.
If we were treated as engaged in a trade or business in the United States, we would be subject to U.S. federal income taxation on a net income basis, which would adversely affect our business and result in decreased cash available for distribution to our shareholders.
 
If, contrary to expectations, we were treated as engaged in a trade or business in the United States, the portion of our net income, if any, that was “effectively connected” with such trade or business would be subject to U.S. federal income taxation at a maximum rate of 35%. In addition, we would be subject to the U.S. federal branch profits tax on its effectively connected earnings and profits at a rate of 30%. The imposition of such taxes would adversely affect our business and would result in decreased cash available for distribution to our shareholders.
 
If there is not sufficient trading in our shares, Aircastle Bermuda and certain of our Irish subsidiaries could lose their eligibility for an exemption from U.S. federal income taxation on rental income from their aircraft used in “international traffic” and could be subject to U.S. federal income taxation on a net income basis which would adversely affect our business and result in decreased cash available for distribution to our shareholders.
 
Beginning in the 2008 taxable year, Aircastle Bermuda and certain of our Irish subsidiaries expect to qualify for an exemption from U.S. federal income taxation under Section 883 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, with respect to income derived from aircraft used in “international traffic”. For this purpose, “international traffic” includes all flights other than those that are conducted from one point in the United States to another point in the United States. To qualify for this exemption in respect of rental income derived from international traffic, in addition to satisfying certain other requirements, our shares must be primarily and regularly traded on a recognized exchange for more than half the days of the taxable year. Our shares will be considered to be primarily and regularly traded on a recognized exchange in any taxable year if: (1) the number of trades in our shares effected on such recognized stock exchanges exceed the number of our shares (or direct interests in our shares) that are traded during the year on all securities markets; (2) trades in our shares are effected on such stock exchanges in more than de minimis quantities on at least 60 days during every calendar quarter in the year; and (3) the aggregate number of our shares traded on such stock exchanges during the taxable year is at least 10% of the average number of our shares outstanding in that class during that year. If our shares cease to be treated as regularly traded in a taxable year, then we may no longer be eligible for the section 883 exemption for such taxable year. In such case, each of Aircastle Bermuda’s and, if they were to fail to qualify for the benefits of the Irish Treaty, certain of our Irish subsidiaries’ U.S. source rental income may be subject to U.S. federal income taxation at a maximum rate of 35% as well as state and local taxation. In addition, each of Aircastle Bermuda and, if they were to fail to qualify for the benefits of the Irish Treaty, certain of our Irish subsidiaries may be subject to the U.S. federal branch profits tax on its effectively connected


78


Table of Contents

earnings and profits at a rate of 30%. The imposition of such taxes would adversely affect our business and would result in decreased cash available for distribution to our shareholders.
 
In taxable years prior to 2008, if substantially all of the U.S. source rental income of Aircastle Bermuda were attributable to activities of Aircastle personnel based in the United States, Aircastle Bermuda could be subject to U.S. federal income taxation on a net income basis rather than at a rate of 4% of its U.S. source gross rental income, which would adversely affect our business and result in decreased cash available for distribution to our shareholders.
 
For years prior to 2008, we adopted certain operating procedures designed to limit the amount of income generated by Aircastle Bermuda that is treated as effectively connected with a U.S. trade or business. Accordingly, it is generally expected that Aircastle Bermuda’s U.S. source rental income in taxable years prior to 2008 will be subject to U.S. federal taxation, on a gross income basis, at a rate not in excess of 4%. If, contrary to expectations, we did not comply with certain administrative guidelines of the Internal Revenue Service, such that 90% or more of Aircastle Bermuda’s U.S. source rental income were attributable to the activities of personnel based in the United States in taxable years prior to 2008, Aircastle Bermuda’s U.S. source rental income in such taxable years could be treated as income effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business in the United States. In such case, Aircastle Bermuda’s U.S. source rental income in such taxable years would be subject to U.S. federal income taxation on its net income at a maximum rate of 35% and as well as state and local taxation. In addition, Aircastle Bermuda would be subject to the U.S. federal branch profits tax on its effectively connected earnings and profits in such taxable years at a rate of 30%. The imposition of such taxes would adversely affect our business and would result in decreased cash available for distribution to our shareholders.
 
Wikinvest © 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012. Use of this site is subject to express Terms of Service, Privacy Policy, and Disclaimer. By continuing past this page, you agree to abide by these terms. Any information provided by Wikinvest, including but not limited to company data, competitors, business analysis, market share, sales revenues and other operating metrics, earnings call analysis, conference call transcripts, industry information, or price targets should not be construed as research, trading tips or recommendations, or investment advice and is provided with no warrants as to its accuracy. Stock market data, including US and International equity symbols, stock quotes, share prices, earnings ratios, and other fundamental data is provided by data partners. Stock market quotes delayed at least 15 minutes for NASDAQ, 20 mins for NYSE and AMEX. Market data by Xignite. See data providers for more details. Company names, products, services and branding cited herein may be trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners. The use of trademarks or service marks of another is not a representation that the other is affiliated with, sponsors, is sponsored by, endorses, or is endorsed by Wikinvest.
Powered by MediaWiki