|
|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
This excerpt taken from the ALL DEF 14A filed Apr 2, 2008. Change-in-Control and Post-Termination Benefits We do not view the change-in-control benefits or post-termination benefits as additional elements of compensation due to the fact that a change-in-control or other triggering event may never occur. However, the use and structure of our changein-control and post-termination plans are consistent with our compensation objectives to attract, motivate and retain highly talented executives. In addition, we believe the change-in-control arrangements preserve morale and productivity, provide a long-term commitment to job stability and financial security, and encourage retention in the face of the possibly disruptive impact of an actual or potential change-in-control of Allstate. Our change-in-control policies ensure that the interests of our executives will be materially consistent with the interests of our shareholders when considering corporate transactions. Our change-in-control arrangements are intended to reassure executives that they will receive previously deferred compensation and that prior equity grants will be honored because decisions as to whether to provide these amounts are not left to management and the directors in place after a change-in-control. We also provide certain protections for annual and long-term incentive awards, and benefits if an executive's employment is terminated within a specific period after a change-in-control. These benefits following a change-in-control are intended to provide executives with sufficient incentive to stay with Allstate in the event of a change-in-control, and provide executives with some measure of job and financial security so that they are not distracted from working on behalf of stockholders prior to or after a change-in-control. The change-in-control and post-termination arrangements which are described in the "Potential Payments as a Result of Termination or Change-in-Control" section are not provided exclusively to the named executives. With the exception of the pension benefit enhancement for Mr. Liddy, a larger group of management employees, and with respect to certain cash severance benefits all regular full-time and regular part-time employees, are eligible to receive the post-termination benefits described in this section. In 2007, the Compensation and Succession Committee directed its executive compensation consultant to review the change-in-control arrangements afforded Allstate's officers relative to competitive practice, generally and within the industry. The resulting analysis showed that Allstate's arrangements were generally consistent with market practice. However, the analysis did identify certain benefits, related to potential payments upon change-in-control, that were not aligned with current market practice. In addition, Allstate identified various provisions of the change-in-control agreements that required revision to comply with new Internal Revenue Service regulations. In November 2007, the Committee approved amended agreements effective December 31, 2007, which Messrs. Ruebenson, Simonson and Wilson executed on or after February 26, 2008. The following is a summary of the more significant changes:
Both Mr. Hale and Mr. Liddy elected to terminate their change-in-control agreements on February 26, 2008 in light of their retirements on March 31, 2008 and April 30, 2008, respectively. |
| |||||||