AAPL » Topics » Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation

This excerpt taken from the AAPL DEF 14A filed Jan 12, 2010.

Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation

As previously announced, the Company is providing its shareholders with the opportunity to cast an advisory vote on executive compensation as described below. The Company believes that it is appropriate to seek the views of shareholders on the design and effectiveness of the Company’s executive compensation program.

The Company’s goal for its executive compensation program is to attract and retain a talented, entrepreneurial and creative team of executives who will provide leadership for the Company’s success in dynamic, competitive markets. The Company seeks to accomplish this goal in a way that is aligned with the long-term interests of the Company’s shareholders. The Company believes that its executive compensation program, which emphasizes long-term equity awards, satisfies this goal and is strongly aligned with the long-term interests of its shareholders. The Company’s total shareholder return over the prior 1-, 3- and 5-year periods was 63%, 141% and 857%, respectively.

The Compensation Discussion and Analysis beginning on page 19 of this Proxy Statement, describes the Company’s executive compensation program and the decisions made by the Compensation Committee in 2009 in more detail. Highlights of the program include the following:

 

   

Mr. Jobs’s total compensation consists of a salary of $1 per year. Mr. Jobs has not received an equity award since 2003.

 

   

Mr. Jobs owns approximately 5.5 million shares of the Company’s common stock, which significantly aligns his interests with those of the Company’s shareholders.

 

   

Cash compensation (base salary and annual performance-based cash bonus award) levels for the other named executive officers are substantially below the levels generally provided by peer companies. The Company has no long-term cash compensation program for its named executive officers.

 

   

The named executive officers, other than Mr. Jobs, receive long-term equity awards in the form of RSUs subject to long-term vesting requirements. RSUs constitute the majority of each executive’s total compensation opportunity. The Company believes these awards ensure that a significant portion of the executives’ compensation is tied to long-term stock price performance.

 

   

None of the named executive officers has an employment agreement or severance arrangement. In addition, the Company generally does not provide any perquisites, tax reimbursements, or change in control benefits to the named executive officers that are not available to other employees.

 

   

Each of the named executive officers is employed at will and is expected to demonstrate exceptional personal performance in order to continue serving as a member of the executive team.

The Company believes the compensation program for the named executive officers was instrumental in helping the Company achieve strong financial performance in the challenging macroeconomic environment. In addition to the 1-, 3- and 5-year performance of the Company’s stock noted above, in 2009 the Company’s revenue grew to $36.5 billion, representing an increase of $4.1 billion or 12% over the prior year. Net income also increased to $5.7 billion in 2009, an increase of $870 million or 18% over the prior year, and the Company’s gross margin in 2009 was 36.0%, up from 34.3% in the prior year. The Company’s strong earnings and operational excellence helped drive a cash balance at the end of 2009 of $34 billion, an increase of $9.5 billion over the prior year.

The Company requests shareholder approval of the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers as disclosed pursuant to the SEC’s compensation disclosure rules (which disclosure includes the Compensation Committee Report, the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, and the compensation tables).

 

48


As an advisory vote, this proposal is not binding upon the Company. However, the Compensation Committee, which is responsible for designing and administering the Company’s executive compensation program, values the opinions expressed by shareholders in their vote on this proposal, and will consider the outcome of the vote when making future compensation decisions for named executive officers.

Vote Required

Approval of Proposal No. 4 requires the affirmative vote of (i) a majority of the shares present or represented by proxy and voting at the Annual Meeting and (ii) a majority of the shares required to constitute the quorum.

Recommendation of the Board

"Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation" elsewhere:

Microsoft (MSFT)
Cisco Systems (CSCO)
Wikinvest © 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012. Use of this site is subject to express Terms of Service, Privacy Policy, and Disclaimer. By continuing past this page, you agree to abide by these terms. Any information provided by Wikinvest, including but not limited to company data, competitors, business analysis, market share, sales revenues and other operating metrics, earnings call analysis, conference call transcripts, industry information, or price targets should not be construed as research, trading tips or recommendations, or investment advice and is provided with no warrants as to its accuracy. Stock market data, including US and International equity symbols, stock quotes, share prices, earnings ratios, and other fundamental data is provided by data partners. Stock market quotes delayed at least 15 minutes for NASDAQ, 20 mins for NYSE and AMEX. Market data by Xignite. See data providers for more details. Company names, products, services and branding cited herein may be trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners. The use of trademarks or service marks of another is not a representation that the other is affiliated with, sponsors, is sponsored by, endorses, or is endorsed by Wikinvest.
Powered by MediaWiki