AAPL » Topics » Baghdasarian, et al. v. Apple Computer, Inc.

This excerpt taken from the AAPL 10-Q filed May 10, 2007.

Baghdasarian, et al. v. Apple Computer, Inc.

Plaintiffs filed this action in Los Angeles County Superior Court on October 31, 2005, on behalf of a purported nationwide class of all purchasers of all Apple wireless products (router, modem, or adaptor) sold at any time. The complaint alleged that the Company misrepresented the transmission rates of these products. The complaint alleged causes of action for breach of express warranty and for violations of the Consumer Legal Remedies Act, California Business & Professions Code §17200 (unfair competition), and California Business & Professions Code §17500 (false advertising). The complaint sought damages and equitable remedies. On December 15, 2005, the Company filed an answer denying all allegations and asserting numerous affirmative defenses. The parties have reached a settlement and the matter is concluded. The settlement did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

This excerpt taken from the AAPL 10-Q filed Feb 2, 2007.

Baghdasarian, et al. v. Apple Computer, Inc.

Plaintiffs filed this action in Los Angeles County Superior Court on October 31, 2005, on behalf of a purported nationwide class of all purchasers of all Apple wireless products (router, modem, or adaptor) sold at any time. The complaint alleges that the Company misrepresented the transmission rates of these products.  The complaint alleges causes of action for breach of express warranty and for violations of the Consumer Legal Remedies Act, California Business & Professions Code §17200 (unfair competition), and California Business & Professions Code §17500 (false advertising).  The complaint seeks damages and equitable remedies.  On December 15, 2005, the Company filed an answer denying all allegations and asserting numerous affirmative defenses.  The parties have reached a settlement and have filed a request for dismissal.  The settlement will not have a material effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

This excerpt taken from the AAPL 10-Q filed Dec 29, 2006.

Baghdasarian, et al. v. Apple Computer, Inc.

Plaintiffs filed this action in Los Angeles County Superior Court on October 31, 2005, on behalf of a purported nationwide class of all purchasers of all Apple wireless products (router, modem, or adaptor) sold at any time.  The complaint alleges that the Company misrepresented the transmission rates of these products.  The complaint alleges causes of action for breach of express warranty and for violations of the Consumer Legal Remedies Act, California Business & Professions Code §17200 (unfair competition) and California Business & Professions Code §17500 (false advertising).  The complaint seeks damages and equitable remedies.  On December 15, 2005, the Company filed an answer denying all allegations and asserting numerous affirmative defenses.  The parties have reached a tentative settlement, which is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

These excerpts taken from the AAPL 10-K filed Dec 29, 2006.

Baghdasarian, et al. v. Apple Computer, Inc.

Plaintiffs filed this action in Los Angeles County Superior Court on October 31, 2005, on behalf of a purported nationwide class of all purchasers of all Apple wireless products (router, modem, or adaptor) sold at any time. The complaint alleges that the Company misrepresented the transmission rates of these products. The complaint alleges causes of action for breach of express warranty and for violations of the Consumer Legal Remedies Act, California Business & Professions Code §17200 (unfair competition) and California Business & Professions Code §17500 (false advertising). The complaint seeks damages and equitable remedies. On December 15, 2005, the Company filed an answer denying all allegations and asserting numerous affirmative defenses. The parties have reached a tentative settlement, which is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

Baghdasarian, et
al. v. Apple Computer, Inc.



Plaintiffs filed this
action in Los Angeles County Superior Court on October 31, 2005, on behalf
of a purported nationwide class of all purchasers of all Apple wireless
products (router, modem, or adaptor) sold at any time. The complaint alleges
that the Company misrepresented the transmission rates of these products. The
complaint alleges causes of action for breach of express warranty and for
violations of the Consumer Legal Remedies Act, California Business &
Professions Code §17200 (unfair competition) and California Business &
Professions Code §17500 (false advertising). The complaint seeks damages and
equitable remedies. On December 15, 2005, the Company filed an answer
denying all allegations and asserting numerous affirmative defenses. The
parties have reached a tentative settlement, which is not expected to have a
material effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.



This excerpt taken from the AAPL 10-Q filed May 5, 2006.

Baghdasarian, et al. v. Apple Computer, Inc.

Plaintiffs filed this action in Los Angeles County Superior Court on October 31, 2005, on behalf of a purported nationwide class of all purchasers of all Apple wireless products (router, modem, or adaptor) sold at any time. The complaint alleges that the Company misrepresented the transmission rates of these products. The complaint alleges causes of action for breach of express warranty and for violations of the Consumer Legal Remedies Act, California Business & Professions Code §17200 (unfair competition) and California Business & Professions Code §17500 (false advertising). The complaint seeks damages and equitable remedies. The Company filed an answer denying all allegations and asserting numerous affirmative defenses to the complaint on December 15, 2005.

 

This excerpt taken from the AAPL 10-Q filed Feb 3, 2006.

Baghdasarian, et al. v. Apple Computer, Inc.

Plaintiffs filed this action in Los Angeles County Superior Court on October 31, 2005, on behalf of a purported nationwide class of all purchasers of all Apple wireless products (router, modem, or adaptor) sold at any time.  The complaint alleges that the Company misrepresented the transmission rates of these products.  The complaint alleges causes of action for breach of express warranty and for violations of the Consumer Legal Remedies Act, California Business & Professions Code §17200 (unfair competition) and California Business & Professions Code §17500 (false advertising).  The complaint seeks damages and equitable remedies.  The Company filed an answer denying all allegations and asserting numerous affirmative defenses to the complaint on December 15, 2005.

 

These excerpts taken from the AAPL 10-K filed Dec 1, 2005.

Baghdasarian, et al. v. Apple Computer, Inc.

Plaintiffs filed this action in Los Angeles County Superior Court on October 31, 2005, on behalf of a purported nationwide class of all purchasers of all Apple wireless products (router, modem, or adaptor) sold at any time. The complaint alleges that the Company misrepresented the transmission rates of these products. The complaint alleges causes of action for breach of express warranty and for violations of the Consumer Legal Remedies Act, California Business & Professions Code §17200 (unfair competition) and California Business & Professions Code §17500 (false advertising). The complaint seeks damages and equitable remedies. The Company’s response to the complaint is not yet due.

Baghdasarian, et
al. v. Apple Computer, Inc.



Plaintiffs filed this
action in Los Angeles County Superior Court on October 31, 2005, on behalf
of a purported nationwide class of all purchasers of all Apple wireless
products (router, modem, or adaptor) sold at any time. The complaint alleges
that the Company misrepresented the transmission rates of these products. The
complaint alleges causes of action for breach of express warranty and for
violations of the Consumer Legal Remedies Act, California Business &
Professions Code §17200 (unfair competition) and California Business &
Professions Code §17500 (false advertising). The complaint seeks damages and
equitable remedies. The Company’s response to the complaint is not yet due.



Wikinvest © 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012. Use of this site is subject to express Terms of Service, Privacy Policy, and Disclaimer. By continuing past this page, you agree to abide by these terms. Any information provided by Wikinvest, including but not limited to company data, competitors, business analysis, market share, sales revenues and other operating metrics, earnings call analysis, conference call transcripts, industry information, or price targets should not be construed as research, trading tips or recommendations, or investment advice and is provided with no warrants as to its accuracy. Stock market data, including US and International equity symbols, stock quotes, share prices, earnings ratios, and other fundamental data is provided by data partners. Stock market quotes delayed at least 15 minutes for NASDAQ, 20 mins for NYSE and AMEX. Market data by Xignite. See data providers for more details. Company names, products, services and branding cited herein may be trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners. The use of trademarks or service marks of another is not a representation that the other is affiliated with, sponsors, is sponsored by, endorses, or is endorsed by Wikinvest.
Powered by MediaWiki