Apple (AAPL)

Barry et al. v. Apple Computer, Inc.

Two Plaintiffs filed this purported class action on May 16, 2006 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, San Jose Division, on behalf of a nationwide class of iPod purchasers between May 2002 and the present. The complaint alleged various problems with the iPod hard drive, including skipping and limited lifespan. Plaintiffs alleged violations of California Business & Professions Code §17200 (unfair competition), the Consumer Legal Remedies Act, the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act and breach of warranties. The complaint sought damages and equitable relief. The plaintiffs voluntarily dismissed this case, without prejudice, on September 18, 2006.

Barry et al. v.
Apple Computer, Inc.

Two Plaintiffs filed this
purported class action on May 16, 2006 in the United States District Court
for the Northern District of California, San Jose Division, on behalf of a
nationwide class of iPod purchasers between May 2002 and the present. The
complaint alleged various problems with the iPod hard drive, including skipping
and limited lifespan. Plaintiffs alleged violations of California Business &
Professions Code §17200 (unfair competition), the Consumer Legal Remedies Act,
the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act and breach of warranties. The complaint
sought damages and equitable relief. The plaintiffs voluntarily dismissed this
case, without prejudice, on September 18, 2006.

Barry et al. v. Apple Computer, Inc.

Two Plaintiffs filed this purported class action on May 16, 2006 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, San Jose Division, on behalf of a nationwide class of iPod purchasers between May 2002 and the present.  The complaint alleged various problems with the iPod hard drive, including skipping and limited lifespan.  Plaintiffs alleged violations of California Business & Professions Code §17200 (unfair competition), the Consumer Legal Remedies Act, the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act and breach of warranties.  The complaint sought damages and equitable relief. The plaintiffs voluntarily dismissed this case, without prejudice, on September 18, 2006.