|
|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
These excerpts taken from the AAPL 10-K filed Dec 19, 2003. BIAX Corporation v. Apple Computer, Inc. Plaintiff BIAX filed this action on September 5, 2001 in the United States District Court in Delaware claiming patent infringement relating to dual processor technology. IBM and Motorola were added as defendants in an amended complaint. Plaintiff sought unspecified damages and other relief. The Company answered the complaint, denied all allegations and asserted numerous affirmative defenses. The Company also asserted counterclaims for declaratory judgment for non-infringement, unenforceability and invalidity. The parties settled this case in August 2003 and the matter is concluded. Settlement of this matter did not have a material effect on the Company's financial position or results of operations. BIAX Corporation v. Apple Computer, Inc. Plaintiff BIAX filed this action on September 5, 2001 in the United States District Court in Delaware claiming patent infringement relating to dual processor technology. These excerpts taken from the AAPL 10-K filed Dec 19, 2002. BIAX Corporation v. Apple Computer, Inc. Plaintiff BIAX filed this action on September 5, 2001 in the United States District Court in Delaware claiming patent infringement relating to dual processor technology. IBM and Motorola were added as defendants in an amended complaint. Plaintiff seeks unspecified damages and other relief. The Company has answered the complaint, denying all allegations and asserting numerous affirmative defenses. The Company also asserted counterclaims requesting a declaratory judgment for non-infringement, unenforceability and invalidity. The parties are in discovery. BIAX Corporation v. Apple Computer, Inc. Plaintiff BIAX filed this action on September 5, 2001 in the United States District Court in Delaware claiming patent infringement relating to dual processor technology. | EXCERPTS ON THIS PAGE:
|
| |||||||