|
|
 | | | |
- close
- close
- close
- close
This excerpt taken from the AAPL 10-Q filed May 5, 2006. Hirst v. Apple, were filed in Toronto, Ontario, Canada on August 15,
2005 and September 12, 2005, respectively. Both actions define the
purported class as a national class consisting of all persons in
Canada who have purchased or who own an iPod. In addition, a similar complaint
regarding iPod battery life, This excerpt taken from the AAPL 10-Q filed Feb 3, 2006. Hirst v. Apple,
were filed in Toronto, Ontario, Canada on August 15, 2005 and September 12,
2005, respectively. Both actions define
the purported class as a national class consisting of all persons in Canada who
have purchased or who own an iPod. A
motion for certification of the class proceeding has been scheduled for the
Spring of 2006.
These excerpts taken from the AAPL 10-K filed Dec 1, 2005. Hirst v. Apple, were filed in Toronto,
Ontario, Canada on August 15, 2005 and September 12, 2005,
respectively. Both actions define the class as a national class consisting of
all persons in Canada who have purchased or who own an iPod. A motion for
certification of the class proceeding has been scheduled for the Spring of
2006.
Hirst v. Apple, were filed in Toronto, Ontario, Canada on August 15, 2005 and September 12, 2005, respectively. Both actions define the class as a national class consisting of all persons in Canada who have purchased or who own an iPod. A motion for certification of the class proceeding has been scheduled for the Spring of 2006. | EXCERPTS ON THIS PAGE:
|
| |||||||
