AAPL » Topics » Stock-Based Compensation

This excerpt taken from the AAPL 10-K filed Jan 25, 2010.

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company accounts for stock-based payment transactions in which the Company receives employee services in exchange for (a) equity instruments of the enterprise or (b) liabilities that are based on the fair value of the enterprise’s equity instruments or that may be settled by the issuance of such equity instruments. Stock-based compensation cost for restricted stock units (“RSUs”) is measured based on the closing fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. Stock-based compensation cost for stock options is estimated at the grant date based on each option’s fair-value as calculated by the Black-Scholes-Merton (“BSM”) option-pricing model. The Company recognizes stock-based compensation cost as expense ratably on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period. The Company will recognize a benefit from stock-based compensation in equity if an incremental tax benefit is realized by following the ordering provisions of the tax law. In addition, the Company accounts for the indirect effects of stock-based compensation on the research tax credit, the foreign tax credit and the domestic manufacturing deduction through the income statement. Further information regarding stock-based compensation can be found in Note 8, “Shareholders’ Equity and Stock-Based Compensation” of this Form 10-K.

These excerpts taken from the AAPL 10-K filed Oct 27, 2009.

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company accounts for stock-based payment transactions in which the Company receives employee services in exchange for (a) equity instruments of the enterprise or (b) liabilities that are based on the fair value of the enterprise’s equity instruments or that may be settled by the issuance of such equity instruments. Stock-based compensation cost for restricted stock units (“RSUs”) is measured based on the closing fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. Stock-based compensation cost for stock options is estimated at the grant date based on each option’s fair-value as calculated by the Black-Scholes-Merton (“BSM”) option-pricing model. The Company recognizes stock-based compensation cost as expense ratably on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period. The Company will recognize a benefit from stock-based compensation in equity if an incremental tax benefit is realized by following the ordering provisions of the tax law. In addition, the Company accounts for the indirect effects of stock-based compensation on the research tax credit, the foreign tax credit and the domestic manufacturing deduction through the income statement. Further information regarding stock-based compensation can be found in Note 7, “Shareholders’ Equity and Stock-Based Compensation.”

Stock-Based Compensation

Stock-based compensation cost for RSUs is measured based on the closing fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. Stock-based compensation cost for stock options is estimated at the grant

 

81


Table of Contents

date based on each option’s fair-value as calculated by the BSM option-pricing model. The BSM option-pricing model incorporates various assumptions including expected volatility, expected life and interest rates. The expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of the Company’s common stock over the most recent period commensurate with the estimated expected life of the Company’s stock options and other relevant factors including implied volatility in market traded options on the Company’s common stock. The Company bases its expected life assumption on its historical experience and on the terms and conditions of the stock awards it grants to employees. The Company recognizes stock-based compensation cost as expense ratably on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period.

The weighted-average assumptions used for the three years ended September 26, 2009, and the resulting estimates of weighted-average fair value per share of options granted and of employee stock purchase plan rights (“stock purchase rights”) during those periods are as follows:

 

     2009     2008    2007

Expected life of stock options

   4.54 years  (a)    3.41 years    3.46 years

Expected life of stock purchase rights

   6 months     6 months    6 months

Interest rate - stock options

   2.04% (a)    3.40%    4.61%

Interest rate - stock purchase rights

     0.58%      3.48%    5.13%

Volatility - stock options

   50.98%  (a)    45.64%    38.13%

Volatility - stock purchase rights

   52.16%      38.51%    39.22%

Dividend yields

   —        —      —  

Weighted-average fair value of stock options granted during the year

   $46.71      $62.73    $31.86

Weighted-average fair value of employee stock purchase plan rights during the year

   $30.62      $42.27    $20.90

 

(a)

In conjunction with the Company’s 2009 equity compensation program changes, it began issuing primarily RSUs rather than stock options to employees, although the Company continues to grant stock options to non-employee directors. Accordingly the weighted average expected life of stock options was influenced by non-employee director stock option grants, which had a ten-year expected life. The weighted average expected life of stock options also affects the resulting interest rate and expected volatility assumptions.

The following table provides a summary of the stock-based compensation expense included in the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three years ended September 26, 2009 (in millions):

 

     2009    2008    2007

Cost of sales

   $ 114    $ 80    $ 35

Research and development

     258      185      77

Selling, general and administrative

     338      251      130
                    

Total stock-based compensation expense

   $ 710    $ 516    $ 242
                    

Stock-based compensation expense capitalized as software development costs was not significant as of September 26, 2009 or September 27, 2008. The income tax benefit related to stock-based compensation expense was $266 million, $169 million and $81 million for 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The total unrecognized compensation cost related to stock options and RSUs expected to vest was $1.4 billion as of September 26, 2009, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.53 years.

This excerpt taken from the AAPL 10-Q filed Apr 23, 2009.

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company accounts for stock-based compensation in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment. Under the provisions of SFAS No. 123R, stock-based compensation cost is estimated at the grant date based on the award’s fair-value as calculated by the Black-Scholes-Merton (“BSM”) option-pricing model and is recognized as expense ratably on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period. The BSM option-pricing model requires various judgmental assumptions including expected volatility, forfeiture rates, and expected option life. Significant changes in any of these assumptions could materially affect the fair value of stock-based awards granted in the future.

These excerpts taken from the AAPL 10-Q filed Jan 23, 2009.

Note 7 – Stock-Based Compensation

SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment, requires the use of a valuation model to calculate the fair value of stock-based awards. The Company uses the Black-Scholes-Merton (“BSM”) option-pricing model to calculate the fair value of stock-based awards. The BSM option-pricing model incorporates various assumptions including expected volatility, expected life, and interest rates. The expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of the Company’s common stock over the most recent period commensurate with the estimated expected life of the Company’s stock options and other relevant factors including implied volatility in market traded options on the Company’s common stock. The Company bases its expected life assumption on its historical experience and on the terms and conditions of the stock awards it grants to employees. Stock-based compensation cost is estimated at the grant date based on the award’s fair-value as calculated by the BSM option-pricing model and is recognized as expense ratably on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period.

The compensation expense incurred by the Company for RSUs is based on the closing market price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant and is amortized ratably on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period.

 

14


The weighted average assumptions used for the three months ended December 27, 2008 and December 29, 2007 and the resulting estimates of weighted-average fair value per share of options granted and of employee stock purchase plan rights (“stock purchase rights”) during those periods are as follows:

 

     Three Months Ended
     December 27, 2008    December 29, 2007

Expected life - stock options

     3.41 years      3.41 years

Expected life - stock purchase rights

     6 months      6 months

Interest rate - stock options

     1.76%      3.63%

Interest rate - stock purchase rights

     2.16%      4.98%

Expected volatility - stock options

     53.40%      45.80%

Expected volatility - stock purchase rights

     47.03%      30.92%

Expected dividend yields

     —        —  

Weighted-average fair value of options granted during the period

   $ 38.25    $ 64.22

Weighted-average fair value of stock purchase rights during the period

   $ 44.52    $ 28.36

The following table provides a summary of the stock-based compensation expense included in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months ended December 27, 2008 and December 29, 2007 (in millions):

 

     Three Months Ended
     December 27, 2008    December 29, 2007

Cost of sales

   $ 28    $ 18

Research and development

     60      39

Selling, general, and administrative

     82      53
             

Total stock-based compensation expense

   $ 170    $ 110
             

Stock-based compensation expense capitalized as part of software development costs was not significant as of December 27, 2008 or December 29, 2007. The income tax benefit related to stock-based compensation expense was $66 million and $34 million for the three months ended December 27, 2008 and December 29, 2007, respectively. As of December 27, 2008, the total unrecognized compensation cost related to outstanding stock options and RSUs expected to vest was $1.8 billion, which the Company expects to recognize over a weighted-average period of 3.02 years.

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company accounts for stock-based compensation in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment. Under the provisions of SFAS No. 123R, stock-based compensation cost is estimated at the grant date based on the award’s fair-value as calculated by the Black-Scholes-Merton (“BSM”) option-pricing model and is recognized as expense ratably on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period. The BSM option-pricing model requires various judgmental assumptions including expected volatility, forfeiture rates, and expected option life. Significant changes in any of these assumptions could materially affect the fair value of stock-based awards granted in the future.

These excerpts taken from the AAPL 10-K filed Nov 5, 2008.

Note 7—Stock-Based Compensation

 

SFAS No. 123R requires the use of a valuation model to calculate the fair value of stock-based awards. The Company uses the BSM option-pricing model to calculate the fair value of stock-based awards. The BSM option-pricing model incorporates various assumptions including expected volatility, expected life, and interest rates. The expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of the Company’s common stock over the most recent period commensurate with the estimated expected life of the Company’s stock options and other relevant factors including implied volatility in market traded options on the Company’s common stock. The Company bases its expected life assumption on its historical experience and on the terms and conditions of the stock awards it grants to employees. Stock-based compensation cost is estimated at the grant date based on the award’s fair-value as calculated by the BSM option-pricing model and is recognized as expense ratably on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period.

The compensation expense incurred by the Company for RSUs is based on the closing market price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant and is amortized ratably on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period.

The weighted-average assumptions used for the three fiscal years ended September 27, 2008, and the resulting estimates of weighted-average fair value per share of options granted and of employee stock purchase plan rights during those periods are as follows:

 

    2008    2007    2006

Expected life of stock options

    3.41 years      3.46 years      3.56 years

Expected life of stock purchase rights

    6 months      6 months      6 months

Interest rate—stock options

    3.40%      4.61%      4.60%

Interest rate—stock purchase rights

    3.48%      5.13%      4.29%

Volatility—stock options

    45.64%      38.13%      40.34%

Volatility—stock purchase rights

    38.51%      39.22%      39.56%

Dividend yields

             

Weighted-average fair value of stock options granted during the year

  $ 62.73    $ 31.86    $ 23.16

Weighted-average fair value of employee stock purchase plan rights during the year

  $ 42.27    $ 20.90    $ 14.06

Note 7—Stock-Based Compensation

SIZE="1"> 


SFAS No. 123R requires the use of a valuation model to calculate the fair value of stock-based awards. The
Company uses the BSM option-pricing model to calculate the fair value of stock-based awards. The BSM option-pricing model incorporates various assumptions including expected volatility, expected life, and interest rates. The expected
volatility is based on the historical volatility of the Company’s common stock over the most recent period commensurate with the estimated expected life of the Company’s stock options and other relevant factors including implied volatility
in market traded options on the Company’s common stock. The Company bases its expected life assumption on its historical experience and on the terms and conditions of the stock awards it grants to employees. Stock-based compensation cost is
estimated at the grant date based on the award’s fair-value as calculated by the BSM option-pricing model and is recognized as expense ratably on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period.

STYLE="margin-top:6px;margin-bottom:0px">The compensation expense incurred by the Company for RSUs is based on the closing market price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant and is amortized
ratably on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period.

The weighted-average assumptions used for the three fiscal years ended
September 27, 2008, and the resulting estimates of weighted-average fair value per share of options granted and of employee stock purchase plan rights during those periods are as follows:

STYLE="font-size:12px;margin-top:0px;margin-bottom:0px"> 


























































































































  2008  2007  2006

Expected life of stock options

  3.41 years   3.46 years   3.56 years

Expected life of stock purchase rights

  6 months   6 months   6 months

Interest rate—stock options

  3.40%   4.61%   4.60%

Interest rate—stock purchase rights

  3.48%   5.13%   4.29%

Volatility—stock options

  45.64%   38.13%   40.34%

Volatility—stock purchase rights

  38.51%   39.22%   39.56%

Dividend yields

        

Weighted-average fair value of stock options granted during the year

 $62.73  $31.86  $23.16

Weighted-average fair value of employee stock purchase plan rights during the year

 $42.27  $20.90  $14.06
This excerpt taken from the AAPL 10-Q filed Jul 23, 2008.

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company accounts for stock-based compensation in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment. Under the provisions of SFAS No. 123R, stock-based compensation cost is estimated at the grant date based on the award’s fair-value as calculated by the Black-Scholes-Merton (“BSM”) option-pricing model and is recognized as expense ratably on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period. The BSM option-pricing model requires various judgmental assumptions including expected volatility, forfeiture rates, and expected option life. Significant changes in any of these assumptions could materially affect the fair value of stock-based awards granted in the future.

This excerpt taken from the AAPL 10-Q filed May 1, 2008.

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company accounts for stock-based compensation in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment. Under the provisions of SFAS No. 123R, stock-based compensation cost is estimated at the grant date based on the award’s fair-value as calculated by the Black-Scholes-Merton (“BSM”) option-pricing model and is recognized as expense ratably on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period. The BSM option-pricing model requires various judgmental assumptions including expected volatility, forfeiture rates, and expected option life. Significant changes in any of these assumptions could materially affect the fair value of stock-based awards granted in the future.

This excerpt taken from the AAPL 10-Q filed Feb 1, 2008.

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company accounts for stock-based compensation in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment (“SFAS No. 123R”). Under the provisions of SFAS No. 123R, stock-based compensation cost is estimated at the grant date based on the award’s fair-value as calculated by the Black-Scholes-Merton (“BSM”) option-pricing model and is recognized as expense ratably on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period. The BSM model requires various judgmental assumptions including expected volatility, forfeiture rates, and expected option life. If any of the assumptions used in the BSM model change significantly, stock-based compensation expense may differ materially in the future from that recorded in the current period.

These excerpts taken from the AAPL 10-K filed Nov 15, 2007.

Note 7—Stock-Based Compensation

The Company has provided pro forma disclosures in Note 1 of the effect on net income and earnings per share for the year ended September 24, 2005 as if the fair value method of accounting for stock-based compensation had been used for its employee stock option grants and employee stock purchase plan purchases. These pro forma effects have been estimated at the date of grant and beginning of the period, respectively, using the BSM option-pricing model.

The Company uses the BSM option-pricing model to calculate the fair value of stock-based awards. The BSM option-pricing model incorporates various assumptions including expected volatility, expected life, and interest rates. The expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of the Company's common stock over the most recent period commensurate with the estimated expected life of the Company's stock options and other relevant factors including implied volatility in market traded options on the Company's common stock. The Company bases its expected life assumption on its historical experience and on the terms and conditions of the stock awards it grants to employees. Stock-based compensation cost is estimated at the grant date based on the award's fair-value as calculated by the BSM option-pricing model and is recognized as expense ratably on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period.

The weighted average assumptions used for 2007, 2006, and 2005 and the resulting estimates of weighted-average fair value per share of options granted and for stock purchases during those periods are as follows:

 
  2007
  2006
  2005
 
Expected life of stock options     3.46 years     3.56 years     3.57 years  
Expected life of stock purchases     6 months     6 months     6 months  
Interest rate—stock options     4.61 %   4.60 %   3.73 %
Interest rate—stock purchases     5.13 %   4.29 %   2.54 %
Volatility—stock options     38.13 %   40.34 %   39.52 %
Volatility—stock purchases     39.22 %   39.56 %   40.88 %
Dividend yields              
Weighted-average fair value of options granted during the year   $ 31.86   $ 23.16   $ 14.41  
Weighted-average fair value of stock purchases during the year   $ 20.90   $ 14.06   $ 7.55  

Note 7—Stock-Based Compensation



The Company has provided pro forma disclosures in Note 1 of the effect on net income and earnings per share for the year ended September 24, 2005 as if the fair
value method of accounting for stock-based compensation had been used for its employee stock option grants and employee stock purchase plan purchases. These pro forma effects have been estimated at
the date of grant and beginning of the period, respectively, using the BSM option-pricing model.



The
Company uses the BSM option-pricing model to calculate the fair value of stock-based awards. The BSM option-pricing model incorporates various assumptions including expected volatility, expected
life, and interest rates. The expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of the Company's common stock over the most recent period commensurate with the estimated expected life of the
Company's stock options and other relevant factors including implied volatility in market traded options on the Company's common stock. The Company bases its expected life assumption on its historical
experience and on the terms and conditions of the stock awards it grants to employees. Stock-based compensation cost is estimated at the grant date based on the award's fair-value as
calculated by the BSM option-pricing model and is recognized as expense ratably on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period.



The
weighted average assumptions used for 2007, 2006, and 2005 and the resulting estimates of weighted-average fair value per share of options granted and for stock purchases during those periods are
as follows:




































































































































 
 2007
 2006
 2005
 
Expected life of stock options  3.46 years  3.56 years  3.57 years 
Expected life of stock purchases  6 months  6 months  6 months 
Interest rate—stock options  4.61% 4.60% 3.73%
Interest rate—stock purchases  5.13% 4.29% 2.54%
Volatility—stock options  38.13% 40.34% 39.52%
Volatility—stock purchases  39.22% 39.56% 40.88%
Dividend yields       
Weighted-average fair value of options granted during the year $31.86 $23.16 $14.41 
Weighted-average fair value of stock purchases during the year $20.90 $14.06 $7.55 




This excerpt taken from the AAPL 10-Q filed Aug 8, 2007.

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company accounts for stock-based compensation in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123 (revised 2004) (“SFAS No. 123R”), Share-Based Payment.  Under the provisions of SFAS No. 123R, stock-based compensation cost is estimated at the grant date based on the award’s fair-value as calculated by the Black-Scholes-Merton (“BSM”) option-pricing model and is recognized as expense ratably over the requisite service period.  The BSM model requires various highly judgmental assumptions including volatility, forfeiture rates, and expected option life.  If any of the assumptions used in the BSM model change significantly, stock-based compensation expense may differ materially in the future from that recorded in the current period.

20




This excerpt taken from the AAPL 10-Q filed May 10, 2007.

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company accounts for stock-based compensation in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123 (revised 2004) (“SFAS No. 123R”), Share-Based Payment. Under the provisions of SFAS No. 123R, stock-based compensation cost is estimated at the grant date based on the award’s fair-value as calculated by the Black-Scholes-Merton (“BSM”) option-pricing model and is recognized as expense ratably over the requisite service period. The BSM model requires various highly judgmental assumptions including volatility, forfeiture rates, and expected option life. If any of the assumptions used in the BSM model change significantly, stock-based compensation expense may differ materially in the future from that recorded in the current period.

20




This excerpt taken from the AAPL 10-Q filed Feb 2, 2007.

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company accounts for stock-based compensation in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123 (revised 2004) (“SFAS No. 123R”), Share-Based Payment.  Under the provisions of SFAS No. 123R, stock-based compensation cost is estimated at the grant date based on the award’s fair-value as calculated by the Black-Scholes-Merton (“BSM”) option-pricing model and is recognized as expense ratably over the requisite service period.  The BSM model requires various highly judgmental assumptions including volatility, forfeiture rates, and expected option life.  If any of the assumptions used in the BSM model change significantly, stock-based compensation expense may differ materially in the future from that recorded in the current period.

This excerpt taken from the AAPL 10-Q filed Dec 29, 2006.

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company accounts for stock-based compensation in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123 (revised 2004) (“SFAS No. 123R”), Share-Based Payment.  Under the provisions of SFAS No. 123R, stock-based compensation cost is estimated at the grant date based on the award’s fair-value as calculated by the Black-Scholes-Merton (“BSM”) option-pricing model and is recognized as expense ratably over the requisite service period.  The BSM model requires various highly judgmental assumptions including volatility, forfeiture rates, and expected option life.  If any of the assumptions used in the BSM model change significantly, stock-based compensation expense may differ materially in the future from that recorded in the current period.

In connection with the Company’s restatement of its consolidated financial statements, the Company has applied judgment in choosing whether to revise measurement dates for prior option grants.  Information regarding the restatement, including ranges of possible additional stock-based compensation expense if other measurement dates had been selected for certain grants, is set forth in the “Explanatory Note” immediately preceding Part I, Item 1.

33




These excerpts taken from the AAPL 10-K filed Dec 29, 2006.

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company accounts for stock-based compensation in accordance with SFAS No. 123R. Under the provisions of SFAS No. 123R, stock-based compensation cost is estimated at the grant date based on the award’s fair value as calculated by the Black-Scholes-Merton (“BSM”) option-pricing model and is recognized as expense ratably over the requisite service period. The BSM model requires various highly

52




judgmental assumptions including volatility, forfeiture rates, and expected option life. If any of the assumptions used in the BSM model change significantly, stock-based compensation expense may differ materially in the future from that recorded in the current period.

In connection with the Company’s restatement of its consolidated financial statements, the Company has applied judgment in choosing whether to revise measurement dates for prior option grants. Information regarding the restatement, including ranges of possible additional stock-based compensation expense if other measurement dates had been selected for certain grants, is set forth in the “Explanatory Note” immediately preceding Part I, Item 1 and in Note 2, “Restatement of Consolidated Financial Statements” in Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of this Form 10-K.

Stock-Based
Compensation



The Company accounts for stock-based compensation in
accordance with SFAS No. 123R. Under the provisions of SFAS No. 123R,
stock-based compensation cost is estimated at the grant date based on the award’s
fair value as calculated by the Black-Scholes-Merton (“BSM”) option-pricing
model and is recognized as expense ratably over the requisite service period. The
BSM model requires various highly




52










judgmental assumptions including volatility,
forfeiture rates, and expected option life. If any of the assumptions used in
the BSM model change significantly, stock-based compensation expense may differ
materially in the future from that recorded in the current period.



In connection with the
Company’s restatement of its consolidated financial statements, the Company has
applied judgment in choosing whether to revise measurement dates for prior
option grants. Information regarding the restatement, including ranges of
possible additional stock-based compensation expense if other measurement dates
had been selected for certain grants, is set forth in the “Explanatory Note”
immediately preceding Part I, Item 1 and in Note 2, “Restatement of
Consolidated Financial Statements” in Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements of this Form 10-K.



This excerpt taken from the AAPL 10-Q filed May 5, 2006.

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company accounts for stock-based compensation in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123R,

This excerpt taken from the AAPL 10-Q filed Feb 3, 2006.

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company accounts for stock-based compensation in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123R,

These excerpts taken from the AAPL 10-K filed Dec 3, 2004.

Note 9—Stock-Based Compensation

The Company has provided pro forma disclosures in Note 1 of these Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of the effect on net income and earnings per share as if the fair value method of accounting for stock compensation had been used for its employee stock option grants and employee stock purchase plan purchases. These pro forma effects have been estimated at the date of grant and beginning of the period, respectively, using the Black-Scholes option pricing model.

For purposes of the pro forma disclosures provided pursuant to SFAS No. 123, the option awards issued in October 2003 and the awards cancelled as part of the Employee Stock Option Exchange Program have been accounted for using modification accounting. In accordance with SFAS No. 123, the grant date of the awards issued is the date of acceptance of the exchange offer by participating employees. The cancellation of certain of the Company's CEO's options and replacement with restricted shares in March 2003 is also being accounted for using modification accounting for purposes of the pro forma disclosures provided pursuant to SFAS No. 123.

93



The assumptions used for each of the last three fiscal years and the resulting estimate of weighted-average fair value per share of options granted during those years are as follows:

 
  2004
  2003
  2002
 
Expected life of stock options     3.5 years     3.5-4 years     4 years  
Expected life of stock purchases     6 months     6 months     6 months  
Interest rate—stock options     2.33%-3.15 %   2.14%-2.45 %   2.90 %
Interest rate—stock purchases     0.96%-1.67 %   1.10%-1.77 %   2.71 %
Volatility—stock options     40 %   40%-63 %   64 %
Volatility—stock purchases     32%-44 %   35%-44 %   51 %
Dividend yields              

Weighted-average fair value of options granted during the year

 

$

7.37

 

$

6.63

 

$

10.11

 
Weighted-average fair value of stock purchases during the year   $ 5.56   $ 4.24   $ 6.73  

For purposes of the pro forma disclosures provided pursuant to SFAS No. 123, the expected volatility assumptions used by the Company prior to the third quarter of 2003 had been based solely on the historical volatility of the Company's common stock over the most recent period commensurate with the estimated expected life of the Company's stock options. Beginning in the third quarter of 2003, the Company has modified this approach to consider other relevant factors including implied volatility in market traded options on the Company's common stock and the impact of unusual fluctuations not reasonably expected to recur on the historical volatility of the Company's common stock. The Company will continue to monitor these and other relevant factors in developing the expected volatility assumption used to value future awards.

Beginning in the third quarter of 2003, the Company shortened its estimate of the expected life of new options granted to its employees from 4 years to 3.5 years. The Company bases its expected life assumption on its historical experience and on the terms and conditions of the stock options it grants to employees. The change in the expected life assumption made during the third quarter of 2003 was the result of the expected impact of shortening the contractual life of new options granted to employees from 10 years to 7 years and changing the vesting provisions of new options granted to employees from 4 year straight-line annual vesting to 4 year straight-line quarterly vesting.

Note 9—Stock-Based Compensation



The
Company has provided pro forma disclosures in Note 1 of these Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of the effect on net income and earnings per share as if the fair value method of
accounting for stock compensation had been used for its employee stock option grants and employee stock purchase plan purchases. These pro forma effects have been estimated at the date of grant and
beginning of the period, respectively, using the Black-Scholes option pricing model.



For
purposes of the pro forma disclosures provided pursuant to SFAS No. 123, the option awards issued in October 2003 and the awards cancelled as part of the Employee Stock Option
Exchange Program have been accounted for using modification accounting. In accordance with SFAS No. 123, the grant date of the awards issued is the date of acceptance of the exchange offer by
participating employees. The cancellation of certain of the Company's CEO's options and replacement with restricted shares in March 2003 is also being accounted for using modification
accounting for purposes of the pro forma disclosures provided pursuant to SFAS No. 123.



93











The
assumptions used for each of the last three fiscal years and the resulting estimate of weighted-average fair value per share of options granted during those years are as follows:




































































































































 
 2004
 2003
 2002
 
Expected life of stock options  3.5 years  3.5-4 years  4 years 
Expected life of stock purchases  6 months  6 months  6 months 
Interest rate—stock options  2.33%-3.15% 2.14%-2.45% 2.90%
Interest rate—stock purchases  0.96%-1.67% 1.10%-1.77% 2.71%
Volatility—stock options  40% 40%-63% 64%
Volatility—stock purchases  32%-44% 35%-44% 51%
Dividend yields       


Weighted-average fair value of options granted during the year

 

$


7.37

 

$


6.63

 

$


10.11

 
Weighted-average fair value of stock purchases during the year $5.56 $4.24 $6.73 




For
purposes of the pro forma disclosures provided pursuant to SFAS No. 123, the expected volatility assumptions used by the Company prior to the third quarter of 2003 had been based solely on
the historical volatility of the Company's common stock over the most recent period commensurate with the estimated expected life of the Company's stock options. Beginning in the third quarter of
2003, the Company has modified this approach to consider other relevant factors including implied volatility in market traded options on the Company's common stock and the impact of unusual
fluctuations not reasonably expected to recur on the historical volatility of the Company's common stock. The Company will continue to monitor these and other relevant factors in developing the
expected volatility assumption used to value future awards.



Beginning
in the third quarter of 2003, the Company shortened its estimate of the expected life of new options granted to its employees from 4 years to 3.5 years. The Company bases its
expected life assumption on its historical experience and on the terms and conditions of the stock options it grants to employees. The change in the expected life assumption made during the third
quarter of 2003 was the result of the expected impact of shortening the contractual life of new options granted to employees from 10 years to 7 years and changing the vesting provisions
of new options granted to employees from 4 year straight-line annual vesting to 4 year straight-line quarterly vesting.



Wikinvest © 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012. Use of this site is subject to express Terms of Service, Privacy Policy, and Disclaimer. By continuing past this page, you agree to abide by these terms. Any information provided by Wikinvest, including but not limited to company data, competitors, business analysis, market share, sales revenues and other operating metrics, earnings call analysis, conference call transcripts, industry information, or price targets should not be construed as research, trading tips or recommendations, or investment advice and is provided with no warrants as to its accuracy. Stock market data, including US and International equity symbols, stock quotes, share prices, earnings ratios, and other fundamental data is provided by data partners. Stock market quotes delayed at least 15 minutes for NASDAQ, 20 mins for NYSE and AMEX. Market data by Xignite. See data providers for more details. Company names, products, services and branding cited herein may be trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners. The use of trademarks or service marks of another is not a representation that the other is affiliated with, sponsors, is sponsored by, endorses, or is endorsed by Wikinvest.
Powered by MediaWiki