Apple (AAPL)

Teleshuttle Technologies, LLC and BTG International Inc. v. Microsoft and Apple Computer, Inc.

Plaintiffs filed this case on July 20, 2004 in United States District Court for the Northern District of California alleging infringement of U.S. patent 6,557,054, entitled “Method and System for Distributing Updates by Presenting Directory of Software Available for User Installation That is Not Already Installed on User Station.” Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint on September 7, 2004, adding a second patent, U.S. patent 6,769,009 entitled “Method and System for Selecting a Personalized Set of Information Channels.” Plaintiffs seek unspecified damages and other relief. The Company filed an answer on October 18, 2004, denying all material allegations and asserting numerous affirmative defenses. On August 22, 2005, the Company filed an amended answer to add charges of inequitable conduct. The case is in discovery. Markman briefing is completed. A technology tutorial and Markman hearing are tentatively scheduled for January 13, 20, and 27, 2006.

Teleshuttle
Technologies, LLC and BTG International Inc. v. Microsoft and Apple
Computer, Inc.

Plaintiffs filed this case
on July 20, 2004 in United States District Court for the Northern District
of California alleging infringement of U.S. patent 6,557,054, entitled “Method
and System for Distributing Updates by Presenting Directory of Software
Available for User Installation That is Not Already Installed on User Station.”
Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint on September 7, 2004, adding a
second patent, U.S. patent 6,769,009 entitled “Method and System for Selecting
a Personalized Set of Information Channels.” Plaintiffs seek unspecified
damages and other relief. The Company filed an answer on October 18, 2004,
denying all material allegations and asserting numerous affirmative defenses.
On August 22, 2005, the Company filed an amended answer to add charges of
inequitable conduct. The case is in discovery. Markman briefing is completed. A
technology tutorial and Markman hearing are tentatively scheduled for January 13,
20, and 27, 2006.

Teleshuttle Technologies, LLC and BTG International Inc. v. Microsoft and Apple Computer, Inc.

Plaintiffs filed this case on July 20, 2004 in United States District Court for the Northern District of California alleging infringement of U.S. patent 6,557,054, entitled “Method and System for Distributing Updates by Presenting Directory of Software Available for User Installation That is Not Already Installed on User Station.” Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint on September 7, 2004, adding a second patent, U.S. patent 6,769,009 entitled “Method and System for Selecting a Personalized Set of Information Channels.” Plaintiffs seek unspecified damages and other relief. The Company filed an answer on October 18, 2004, denying all material allegations and asserting numerous affirmative defenses. The case is in discovery.  A Markman hearing is tentatively set for October 28, 2005.

Teleshuttle Technologies, LLC and BTG International Inc. v. Microsoft and Apple Computer, Inc.

Plaintiffs filed this case on July 20, 2004 in United States District Court for the Northern District of California alleging infringement of U.S. patent 6,557,054, entitled “Method and System for Distributing Updates by Presenting Directory of Software Available for User Installation That is Not Already Installed on User Station.” Plaintiffs seek unspecified damages and other relief. Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint on September 7, 2004, adding a second patent, U.S. patent 6,769,009 entitled “Method and System for Selecting a Personalized Set of Information Channels.” The Company filed an answer on October 18, 2004, denying all material allegations and asserting numerous affirmative defenses. The case is in discovery.  Tentative Markman hearing dates are set for September 9, and 16, 2005.

Teleshuttle Technologies, LLC and BTG International Inc. v. Microsoft and Apple Computer, Inc.

Plaintiffs filed this case on July 20, 2004 in United States District Court for the Northern District of California alleging infringement of U.S. patent 6,557,054, entitled “Method and System for Distributing Updates by Presenting Directory of Software Available for User Installation That is Not Already Installed on User Station.” Plaintiffs seek unspecified damages and other relief. Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint on September 7, 2004, adding a second patent, U.S. patent 6,769,009 entitled “Method and System for Selecting a Personalized Set of Information Channels.” The Company filed an answer on October 18, 2004, denying all material allegations and asserting numerous affirmative defenses. The case is in discovery.

Teleshuttle Technologies, LLC and BTG International Inc. v. Microsoft and Apple Computer, Inc.

Plaintiffs filed this case on July 20, 2004 in United States District Court for the Northern District of California alleging infringement of U.S. patent 6,557,054, entitled "Method and System for Distributing Updates by Presenting Directory of Software Available for User Installation That is Not Already Installed on User Station." Plaintiffs seek unspecified damages and other relief. Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint on September 7, 2004, adding a second patent, US patent 6,769,009 entitled "Method and System for Selecting a Personalized Set of Information Channels." The Company filed an answer on October 18, 2004, denying all allegations and asserting numerous affirmative defenses.

Teleshuttle Technologies, LLC and BTG International Inc. v. Microsoft and Apple Computer, Inc.

Plaintiffs
filed this case on July 20, 2004 in United States District Court for the Northern District of California alleging infringement of U.S. patent 6,557,054, entitled "Method and System
for Distributing Updates by Presenting Directory of Software Available for User Installation That is Not Already Installed on User Station." Plaintiffs seek unspecified damages and other relief.
Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint on September 7, 2004, adding a second patent, US patent 6,769,009 entitled "Method and System for Selecting a Personalized Set of Information Channels."
The Company filed an answer on October 18, 2004, denying all allegations and asserting numerous affirmative defenses.