AZN » Topics » Arrangements with Merck

This excerpt taken from the AZN 20-F filed Mar 27, 2007.
Arrangements with Merck
Introduction
In 1982, Astra AB set up a joint venture with Merck & Co., Inc. for the purposes of selling, marketing and distributing certain Astra products in the US. In 1998, this joint venture was restructured (the “Restructuring”). Under the agreements relating to the Restructuring (the “Agreements”), a US limited partnership was formed, in which Merck is the limited partner and AstraZeneca is the general partner, and AstraZeneca obtained control of the joint venture’s business subject to certain limited partner and other rights held by Merck and its affiliates. These rights provide Merck with safeguards over the activities of the partnership and place limitations on AstraZeneca’s commercial freedom to operate. The Agreements provide for:

> Annual contingent payments.
> A payment to Merck in the event of a business combination between Astra and a third party in order for Merck to relinquish certain claims to that third party’s products.
> Termination arrangements which, if and when triggered, cause Merck to relinquish its interests in AstraZeneca’s products and activities.

These elements are discussed in further detail below together with a summary of their accounting treatments.

Annual contingent payments
AstraZeneca makes ongoing payments to Merck based on sales of certain of its products in the US (the “contingent payments” on the “agreement products”). As a result of the merger of Astra and Zeneca in 1999, these contingent payments (excluding those in respect of Prilosec and Nexium) cannot be less than annual minimum sums between 2002 and 2007 ranging from $125m to $225m. AstraZeneca’s payments have exceeded the minimum level in 2002 to 2006 and, notwithstanding the entry of a generic competitor to Toprol-XL in November 2006, AstraZeneca has no reason to believe that the annual payment in 2007, the final year in which minimum levels apply, will fall below the minimum obligations.


Back to Contents

134 ASTRAZENECA ANNUAL REPORT AND FORM 20-F INFORMATION 2006

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED

 

26

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES CONTINUED

Payment in the event of a business combination
On the merger of Astra and Zeneca, a one-time Lump Sum Payment of $809m was triggered. As a result of this payment, Merck relinquished any claims it may have had to Zeneca products.

Termination arrangements
The Agreements provided for arrangements and payments under which, subject to the exercise of certain options, the rights and interests in AstraZeneca’s activities and products held by Merck immediately prior to the merger would be terminated, including details of:

> The Advance Payment
> The Partial Retirement
> The First Option and True-Up
> The Loan Note Receivable
> The Second Option

Advance Payment
The merger between Astra and Zeneca triggered the first step in the termination arrangements. Merck relinquished all rights, including contingent payments on future sales, to potential Astra products with no existing or pending US patents at the time of the merger. As a result, AstraZeneca now has rights to such products and is relieved of potential obligations to Merck and restrictions in respect of those products (including annual contingent payments), affording AstraZeneca substantial freedom to exploit the products as it sees fit.

At the time of the merger, the Advance Payment was paid. It was calculated as the then net present value of $2.8bn discounted from 2008 to the date of merger at a rate of 13% per annum and amounted to $967m. It is subject to a true-up in 2008, as discussed under “First Option and True-Up” below.

Partial Retirement
In 2008, there will be a partial retirement of Merck’s limited partnership interest by payment to Merck of an amount calculated as a multiple of the average annual contingent payments from 2005 to 2007 on the relevant products, plus $750m. Upon the Partial Retirement, Merck’s rights in respect of certain of the agreement products will end. The products covered by the Partial Retirement include Toprol-XL, Pulmicort, Rhinocort and Symbicort, the last of which is planned to be launched in the US in the middle of 2007, although this timeline is dependent upon successful transfer of technology from development to manufacturing and completion of validation batches.

First Option and True-Up
In 2008, a calculation will be made of the Appraised Value, being the net present value of the future contingent payments in respect of all agreement products not covered by the Partial Retirement, other than Prilosec and Nexium. Payment of the Appraised Value to Merck in 2008 will take place only if Merck exercises the First Option. Should Merck not exercise this option in 2008, AstraZeneca may exercise it in 2010 for a sum equal to the 2008 Appraised Value. Contingent payments will continue from 2008 to 2010 if AstraZeneca exercises in 2010. Upon exercise of the First Option Merck will relinquish its rights over the agreement products not covered by the Partial Retirement, other than Nexium and Prilosec. If neither Merck nor AstraZeneca exercises the option, the contingent payment arrangements in respect of these agreement products will continue (as will AstraZeneca’s other obligations and restrictions in respect of these products) and the Appraised Value will not be paid.

Products covered by the First Option include Atacand, Plendil and certain compounds still in development. In addition, in 2008 there will be a true-up of the Advance Payment. The true-up amount will be based on a multiple of the average annual contingent payments from 2005 to 2007 in respect of all the agreement products with the exception of Prilosec and Nexium (subject to a minimum of $6.6bn), plus other defined amounts (totalling $912m). It is then reduced by the Appraised Value (whether paid or not), the Partial Retirement and the Advance Payment (at its undiscounted amount of $2.8bn) to determine the true-up amount. The true-up will be settled in 2008 irrespective of whether the First Option is exercised, and this could result in a further payment by AstraZeneca to Merck or a payment by Merck to AstraZeneca.

Should Merck exercise the First Option in 2008, AstraZeneca will make payments in respect of the Partial Retirement, the First Option and the true-up totalling a minimum of $4.7bn. If AstraZeneca exercises the First Option in 2010, the combined effect of the amounts paid to Merck in 2008 and 2010 will total the same amount.

Loan Note Receivable
Included in the assets and liabilities covered by the Restructuring is a loan note receivable by AstraZeneca from Merck with a face value of $1.4bn. In 2008, at the same time as the settlement of the Partial Retirement and the true-up, Merck will settle the loan note receivable by paying AstraZeneca $1.4bn.

Second Option
A Second Option exists whereby AstraZeneca has the option to re-purchase Merck’s interests in Prilosec and Nexium in the US. This option is exercisable by AstraZeneca two years after the exercise of the First Option, whether the First Option is exercised in either 2008 or 2010. Exercise of the Second Option by AstraZeneca at a later date is also provided for in 2017 or if combined annual sales of the two products fall below a minimum amount provided, in each case, that the First Option has been exercised. The exercise price for the Second Option is the net present value of the future annual contingent payments on Prilosec and Nexium as determined at the time of exercise. If the Second Option is exercised, Merck will then have relinquished all its interests in the partnership and the agreement products including rights to contingent payments.


Back to Contents

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 135
   

 

26 COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES CONTINUED
General
The precise amount and timing of settlements with Merck under the Partial Retirement, the First Option and the true-up cannot be determined at this time. Various components of the calculations are based, in part, on net sales between 2005 and 2007 and on forecasted performance beyond 2007, and payment of the First Option is contingent upon Merck (or AstraZeneca) exercising the First Option. Similarly, the timing and amount of the Second Option cannot be determined at this time.

With the exception of the interests in Nexium and Prilosec, the total of the payments yet to be made under the termination arrangements is based, in part, on the contingent payments made in 2005 to 2007 (subject to the minimum amount) and is likely to be substantially driven by the sales of Toprol-XL, Pulmicort, Rhinocort and Atacand. However, AstraZeneca anticipates that the benefits that accrue under all the termination arrangements arise:

> Currently, from the substantial freedom over products acquired or discovered post-merger.
   
> On occurrence of each stage of such arrangements, from enhanced contributions from, and substantial freedom over, those products that have already been launched (for example, Rhinocort and Atacand), those that are due to be launched in the US (in particular, Symbicort) and those that are in development. Benefits include relief from contingent payments, anticipated cost savings from cessation of manufacturing arrangements and other cost efficiencies together with the strategic advantages of increased freedom to operate.

This excerpt taken from the AZN 6-K filed Mar 6, 2007.
Arrangements with Merck
Introduction
In 1982, Astra AB set up a joint venture with Merck & Co., Inc. for the purposes of selling, marketing and distributing certain Astra products in the US. In 1998, this joint venture was restructured (the “Restructuring”). Under the agreements relating to the Restructuring (the “Agreements”), a US limited partnership was formed, in which Merck is the limited partner and AstraZeneca is the general partner, and AstraZeneca obtained control of the joint venture’s business subject to certain limited partner and other rights held by Merck and its affiliates. These rights provide Merck with safeguards over the activities of the partnership and place limitations on AstraZeneca’s commercial freedom to operate. The Agreements provide for:

> Annual contingent payments.
> A payment to Merck in the event of a business combination between Astra and a third party in order for Merck to relinquish certain claims to that third party’s products.
> Termination arrangements which, if and when triggered, cause Merck to relinquish its interests in AstraZeneca’s products and activities.

These elements are discussed in further detail below together with a summary of their accounting treatments.

Annual contingent payments
AstraZeneca makes ongoing payments to Merck based on sales of certain of its products in the US (the “contingent payments” on the “agreement products”). As a result of the merger of Astra and Zeneca in 1999, these contingent payments (excluding those in respect of Prilosec and Nexium) cannot be less than annual minimum sums between 2002 and 2007 ranging from $125m to $225m. AstraZeneca’s payments have exceeded the minimum level in 2002 to 2006 and, notwithstanding the entry of a generic competitor to Toprol-XL in November 2006, AstraZeneca has no reason to believe that the annual payment in 2007, the final year in which minimum levels apply, will fall below the minimum obligations.


Back to Contents

134 ASTRAZENECA ANNUAL REPORT AND FORM 20-F INFORMATION 2006

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED

 

26

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES CONTINUED

Payment in the event of a business combination
On the merger of Astra and Zeneca, a one-time Lump Sum Payment of $809m was triggered. As a result of this payment, Merck relinquished any claims it may have had to Zeneca products.

Termination arrangements
The Agreements provided for arrangements and payments under which, subject to the exercise of certain options, the rights and interests in AstraZeneca’s activities and products held by Merck immediately prior to the merger would be terminated, including details of:

> The Advance Payment
> The Partial Retirement
> The First Option and True-Up
> The Loan Note Receivable
> The Second Option

Advance Payment
The merger between Astra and Zeneca triggered the first step in the termination arrangements. Merck relinquished all rights, including contingent payments on future sales, to potential Astra products with no existing or pending US patents at the time of the merger. As a result, AstraZeneca now has rights to such products and is relieved of potential obligations to Merck and restrictions in respect of those products (including annual contingent payments), affording AstraZeneca substantial freedom to exploit the products as it sees fit.

At the time of the merger, the Advance Payment was paid. It was calculated as the then net present value of $2.8bn discounted from 2008 to the date of merger at a rate of 13% per annum and amounted to $967m. It is subject to a true-up in 2008, as discussed under “First Option and True-Up” below.

Partial Retirement
In 2008, there will be a partial retirement of Merck’s limited partnership interest by payment to Merck of an amount calculated as a multiple of the average annual contingent payments from 2005 to 2007 on the relevant products, plus $750m. Upon the Partial Retirement, Merck’s rights in respect of certain of the agreement products will end. The products covered by the Partial Retirement include Toprol-XL, Pulmicort, Rhinocort and Symbicort, the last of which is planned to be launched in the US in the middle of 2007, although this timeline is dependent upon successful transfer of technology from development to manufacturing and completion of validation batches.

First Option and True-Up
In 2008, a calculation will be made of the Appraised Value, being the net present value of the future contingent payments in respect of all agreement products not covered by the Partial Retirement, other than Prilosec and Nexium. Payment of the Appraised Value to Merck in 2008 will take place only if Merck exercises the First Option. Should Merck not exercise this option in 2008, AstraZeneca may exercise it in 2010 for a sum equal to the 2008 Appraised Value. Contingent payments will continue from 2008 to 2010 if AstraZeneca exercises in 2010. Upon exercise of the First Option Merck will relinquish its rights over the agreement products not covered by the Partial Retirement, other than Nexium and Prilosec. If neither Merck nor AstraZeneca exercises the option, the contingent payment arrangements in respect of these agreement products will continue (as will AstraZeneca’s other obligations and restrictions in respect of these products) and the Appraised Value will not be paid.

Products covered by the First Option include Atacand, Plendil and certain compounds still in development. In addition, in 2008 there will be a true-up of the Advance Payment. The true-up amount will be based on a multiple of the average annual contingent payments from 2005 to 2007 in respect of all the agreement products with the exception of Prilosec and Nexium (subject to a minimum of $6.6bn), plus other defined amounts (totalling $912m). It is then reduced by the Appraised Value (whether paid or not), the Partial Retirement and the Advance Payment (at its undiscounted amount of $2.8bn) to determine the true-up amount. The true-up will be settled in 2008 irrespective of whether the First Option is exercised, and this could result in a further payment by AstraZeneca to Merck or a payment by Merck to AstraZeneca.

Should Merck exercise the First Option in 2008, AstraZeneca will make payments in respect of the Partial Retirement, the First Option and the true-up totalling a minimum of $4.7bn. If AstraZeneca exercises the First Option in 2010, the combined effect of the amounts paid to Merck in 2008 and 2010 will total the same amount.

Loan Note Receivable
Included in the assets and liabilities covered by the Restructuring is a loan note receivable by AstraZeneca from Merck with a face value of $1.4bn. In 2008, at the same time as the settlement of the Partial Retirement and the true-up, Merck will settle the loan note receivable by paying AstraZeneca $1.4bn.

Second Option
A Second Option exists whereby AstraZeneca has the option to re-purchase Merck’s interests in Prilosec and Nexium in the US. This option is exercisable by AstraZeneca two years after the exercise of the First Option, whether the First Option is exercised in either 2008 or 2010. Exercise of the Second Option by AstraZeneca at a later date is also provided for in 2017 or if combined annual sales of the two products fall below a minimum amount provided, in each case, that the First Option has been exercised. The exercise price for the Second Option is the net present value of the future annual contingent payments on Prilosec and Nexium as determined at the time of exercise. If the Second Option is exercised, Merck will then have relinquished all its interests in the partnership and the agreement products including rights to contingent payments.


Back to Contents

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 135
   

 

26 COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES CONTINUED
General
The precise amount and timing of settlements with Merck under the Partial Retirement, the First Option and the true-up cannot be determined at this time. Various components of the calculations are based, in part, on net sales between 2005 and 2007 and on forecasted performance beyond 2007, and payment of the First Option is contingent upon Merck (or AstraZeneca) exercising the First Option. Similarly, the timing and amount of the Second Option cannot be determined at this time.

With the exception of the interests in Nexium and Prilosec, the total of the payments yet to be made under the termination arrangements is based, in part, on the contingent payments made in 2005 to 2007 (subject to the minimum amount) and is likely to be substantially driven by the sales of Toprol-XL, Pulmicort, Rhinocort and Atacand. However, AstraZeneca anticipates that the benefits that accrue under all the termination arrangements arise:

> Currently, from the substantial freedom over products acquired or discovered post-merger.
   
> On occurrence of each stage of such arrangements, from enhanced contributions from, and substantial freedom over, those products that have already been launched (for example, Rhinocort and Atacand), those that are due to be launched in the US (in particular, Symbicort) and those that are in development. Benefits include relief from contingent payments, anticipated cost savings from cessation of manufacturing arrangements and other cost efficiencies together with the strategic advantages of increased freedom to operate.

This excerpt taken from the AZN 6-K filed Aug 4, 2006.
Arrangements with Merck
As described in more detail in the Annual Report and Form 20-F Information 2005, AstraZeneca has significant arrangements with Merck & Co., Inc. relating to certain of our products and development compounds. These arrangements include exit provisions from 2008 onwards and we regularly monitor the value of the benefits we expect to receive.

The exit provisions are subject to a minimum overall net payment of $3.3 billion and will offer AstraZeneca unencumbered discretion in its operations in the US market (except in respect of Prilosec™ and Nexium™) without the restrictions of various contractual obligations that are currently imposed as a result of Merck’s interests, together with relief from contingent payment obligations. The projected value of the benefits to be obtained in 2008 depends on a number of factors including the future contributions from products that have already been launched, those that are due to be launched in the US and those that are in development, together with the further value that AstraZeneca can extract from greater freedom to operate in the US.

20






This excerpt taken from the AZN 6-K filed Feb 6, 2006.

Arrangements with Merck

As described in more detail in the Annual Report and Form 20-F Information 2004, AstraZeneca has significant arrangements with Merck & Co., Inc. relating to certain of our products and development compounds (the agreement products). These arrangements include exit provisions from 2008 onwards and we regularly monitor the value of the benefits we expect to receive.

The exit provisions are subject to a minimum overall net payment of $3.3 billion and will offer AstraZeneca unencumbered discretion in its operations in the US market (except in respect of Prilosec™ and Nexium™) without the restrictions of various contractual obligations that are currently imposed as a result of Merck’s interests, together with relief from contingent payment obligations. The projected value of the benefits obtained in 2008 depends on a number of factors including the future contributions from products that have already been launched, those that are due to be launched in the US and those that are in development together with the further value AstraZeneca can extract from greater freedom to operate in the US.

22






This excerpt taken from the AZN 6-K filed Nov 8, 2005.
Arrangements with Merck
As described in more detail in the Annual Report and Form 20-F Information 2004, AstraZeneca has significant arrangements with Merck & Co., Inc. relating to certain of our products and development compounds (the agreement products). These arrangements include exit provisions from 2008 onwards and we regularly monitor the value of the benefits we expect to receive.

The exit provisions are subject to a minimum overall net payment of $3.3 billion and will offer AstraZeneca unencumbered discretion in its operations in the US market (except in respect of Prilosec™ and Nexium™) without the restrictions of various contractual obligations that are currently imposed as a result of Merck’s interests, together with relief from contingent payment obligations. The projected value of the benefits obtained in 2008 depends on a number of factors including the future contributions from products that have already been launched, those that are due to be launched in the US and those that are in development together with the further value AstraZeneca can extract from greater freedom to operate in the US.

17




This excerpt taken from the AZN 6-K filed Aug 5, 2005.
Arrangements with Merck
As described in more detail in the Annual Report and Form 20-F Information 2004, AstraZeneca has significant arrangements with Merck & Co., Inc. relating to certain of our products and development compounds (the agreement products). These arrangements include exit provisions from 2008 onwards and we regularly monitor the value of the benefits we expect to receive.

The exit provisions are subject to a minimum overall payment of $3.3 billion and will offer AstraZeneca unencumbered discretion in its operations in the US market without the restrictions of various contractual obligations that are currently imposed as a result of Merck’s interests, together with relief from contingent payment obligations. The projected value of the benefits obtained in 2008 depends on a number of factors including the future contributions from products that have already been launched, those that are due to be launched in the US and those that are in development together with the further value AstraZeneca can extract from greater freedom to operate in the US.

18






Wikinvest © 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012. Use of this site is subject to express Terms of Service, Privacy Policy, and Disclaimer. By continuing past this page, you agree to abide by these terms. Any information provided by Wikinvest, including but not limited to company data, competitors, business analysis, market share, sales revenues and other operating metrics, earnings call analysis, conference call transcripts, industry information, or price targets should not be construed as research, trading tips or recommendations, or investment advice and is provided with no warrants as to its accuracy. Stock market data, including US and International equity symbols, stock quotes, share prices, earnings ratios, and other fundamental data is provided by data partners. Stock market quotes delayed at least 15 minutes for NASDAQ, 20 mins for NYSE and AMEX. Market data by Xignite. See data providers for more details. Company names, products, services and branding cited herein may be trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners. The use of trademarks or service marks of another is not a representation that the other is affiliated with, sponsors, is sponsored by, endorses, or is endorsed by Wikinvest.
Powered by MediaWiki