Annual Reports

 
Quarterly Reports

 
8-K

 
Other

  • Form 3 (Sep 14, 2017)
  • Form 4 (Aug 11, 2017)
  • Form 4 (Aug 3, 2017)
  • Form 4 (Jul 28, 2017)
  • Form 4 (Jul 17, 2017)
  • Form 4 (Jun 27, 2017)
BOK Financial DEF 14A 2014
BOKF-2013.12.31-Proxy

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Filed by the Registrant T
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant £
Check the appropriate box:
£ Preliminary Proxy Statement
£ Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
T Definitive Proxy Statement
£ Definitive Additional Materials
£ Soliciting Material Pursuant to (S)240.14a-12


BOK FINANCIAL CORPORATION
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
T No fee required.
£ Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
-----------------------------------------------------------------     
2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
------------------------------------------------------------------
3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11
(set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
------------------------------------------------------------------
4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
------------------------------------------------------------------
5) Total fee paid:
------------------------------------------------------------------

£ Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

£ Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

1) Amount Previously Paid:
 
------------------------------------------------------------------
2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
 
------------------------------------------------------------------
3) Filing Party:

------------------------------------------------------------------
4) Date Filed:
 
------------------------------------------------------------------









March 19, 2014




To Our Shareholders:

The Annual Meeting of Shareholders of BOK Financial Corporation will be held this year on Tuesday, April 29, 2013, at 2:00 p.m. local time. This year’s Annual Meeting will be a virtual meeting of shareholders. You will be able to participate in the meeting, vote, and submit questions during the meeting via live webcast by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/BOKF2014 and entering your secure control number, which can be found on the enclosed proxy card. Details of the business to be conducted at the annual meeting are given in the attached Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement. Also enclosed is our Annual Report to Shareholders, covering the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013.

We hope that you will be able to attend this meeting via live webcast, but all shareholders, whether or not they expect to attend the meeting, are requested to complete, date and sign the enclosed proxy and return it in the enclosed envelope as promptly as possible.



Sincerely,

George B. Kaiser, Chairman of the
Board of Directors


Steven G. Bradshaw, President and
Chief Executive Officer





TABLE OF CONTENTS

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

2









3


BOK FINANCIAL CORPORATION

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
To be held on April 29, 2014

To Our Shareholders:

Notice is hereby given that the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of BOK Financial Corporation (the “Company” or “BOK Financial”), an Oklahoma corporation, will be held via live webcast at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/BOKF2014 on April 29, 2014, at 2:00 p.m. local time, for the following purposes:

1.
To fix the number of directors to be elected at twenty-two (22) and to elect twenty-two (22) persons as directors for a term of one year or until their successors have been elected and qualified;

2.
To ratify the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent auditor for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2014;

3.
To consider an advisory vote to approve the compensation of the named executive officers; and

4.
To transact such other business as may properly be brought before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or adjournments thereof.

The meeting may be adjourned from time to time and, at any reconvened meeting, action with respect to the matters specified in this notice may be taken without further notice to shareholders unless required by the Company’s Bylaws.

The Board recommends that shareholders vote FOR (i) the director nominees named in the accompanying Proxy Statement, (ii) the ratification of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent auditor for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2014; and (iii) the approval of the named executive officers’ compensation.

Only shareholders of record at the close of business on February 28, 2014 shall be entitled to receive notice of, and to vote at, the annual meeting. A complete list of shareholders entitled to vote will be available for inspection at our offices, Bank of Oklahoma Tower, One Williams Center, Tulsa, OK 74172, and electronically during the annual meeting at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/BOKF2014.

BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

    

Frederic Dorwart, Secretary
March 19, 2014
Tulsa, Oklahoma



4


BOK FINANCIAL CORPORATION
Bank of Oklahoma Tower
Tulsa, Oklahoma 74172
PROXY STATEMENT FOR ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

To be held April 29, 2014
General

The enclosed proxy is solicited on behalf of the Board of Directors of BOK Financial Corporation for use at our annual meeting of shareholders. The annual meeting will be held on Tuesday, April 29, 2014, at 2:00 p.m. local time via live webcast at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/BOKF2014.

These proxy materials will be mailed on or about March 19, 2014 to holders of record of common stock as of the close of business on February 28, 2014.
Voting by Proxy

If you are the “record holder” of your shares (shares owned in your own name and not through a bank or brokerage firm), you may vote by phone, by mail, over the Internet, or in person (via live webcast) at the annual meeting. We encourage you to vote by phone, mail, or on the Internet in advance of the meeting even if you plan to attend the live webcast of the meeting.

If not revoked, your proxy will be voted at the annual meeting in accordance with your instructions marked on the proxy card. If you fail to mark your proxy with instructions, your proxy will be voted in accordance with the recommendations of the Board of Directors: (1) FOR the election of the twenty-two (22) nominees for director listed in this Proxy Statement, (2) FOR the ratification of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent auditor for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2014, and (3) FOR the approval of the named executives’ compensation. If you are voting shares held in the BOK Financial Thrift Plan and you fail to mark your proxy with instructions, your shares will be voted by the Trustee of the Thrift Plan in the same ratio as those shares credited to the account of the Thrift Plan members who do give instructions to the Trustee.
If you hold your shares in “street name” (shares held in the name of a bank or broker on a person’s behalf), you must vote by following the instructions on the form that you receive from your broker or nominee. Without your instructions, your broker or nominee is permitted to use its own discretion and vote your shares on certain routine matters (such as Item 2), but is not permitted to use discretion and vote your shares on non-routine matters (such as Items 1 and 3). Prior to 2010, the election of directors was considered a routine matter, but since that time brokers have not been permitted to vote your shares for the election of directors, and those votes will constitute broker non-votes. Therefore, we urge you to give voting instructions to your broker on all voting items.
As to any other matter that may properly be brought before the annual meeting, your proxy will be voted as the Board of Directors may recommend. If the Board of Directors makes no recommendation, your proxy will be voted as the proxy holder named in your proxy card deems advisable. The Board of Directors does not know of any other matter that is expected to be presented for consideration at the annual meeting.


5


Any shareholder executing a proxy retains the right to revoke it any time prior to exercise at the annual meeting. A proxy may be revoked by (i) delivery of written notice of revocation to Frederic Dorwart, Secretary, at 124 East Fourth Street, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74103, (ii) execution and delivery of a later proxy to the address indicated on the proxy card, or (iii) voting the shares electronically at the annual meeting. If not revoked, all shares represented by properly executed proxies will be voted as specified therein.
Voting and Quorum Requirements at the Meeting

Only holders of shares of common stock of the Company at the close of business on February 28, 2014 (the “record date”) are entitled to notice of and to vote at the annual meeting. On the record date, there were 70,854,544 shares of common stock entitled to vote.

You will have one vote for each share of common stock held by you on the record date.

In order to have a meeting it is necessary that a quorum be present. The presence in person or by proxy of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock is necessary to constitute a quorum at the annual meeting. Abstentions and broker non-votes will be counted for purposes of determining the presence or absence of a quorum. Abstentions and broker non-votes will not be counted as having voted either for or against a proposal.

The affirmative vote of the holders of shares representing a majority of the voting power of the shareholders present or represented at the meeting in which a quorum is present and entitled to vote is required for approval of all matters other than election of directors. Directors are elected by the affirmative vote of the holders of shares representing a majority of the voting power of the shareholders present or represented at the meeting in which a quorum is present and entitled to vote for the election of directors, but if the number of nominees exceeds the number of directors to be elected (i.e. a contested election), the shareholders shall instead elect the directors by plurality vote of the shares present in person or by proxy.

George B. Kaiser currently owns approximately 59.4% of the outstanding common stock and plans to vote all of his shares.
Solicitation of Proxies

We are paying for all our costs incurred in soliciting proxies for the annual meeting. In addition to solicitation by mail, we may use our directors, officers and regular employees to solicit proxies by telephone or otherwise. These personnel will not be specifically compensated for these services. We will pay persons holding shares of common stock for the benefit of others, such as nominees, brokerage houses, banks, and other fiduciaries, for the expense of forwarding solicitation materials to the beneficial owner.
Annual Report

Our Annual Report to Shareholders, covering the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, including audited financial statements, is enclosed. No parts of the Annual Report are incorporated in this Proxy Statement or are deemed to be a part of the material for the solicitation of proxies.

Principal Shareholders of the Company

To the extent known to the Board of Directors of the Company, as of February 28, 2014, the only shareholders of the Company having beneficial ownership of more than 5% of the shares of common stock of the Company are as set forth below:

6



Name & Address of Beneficial Owner
 
Beneficial Ownership
 
Class
 
 
 
 
 
George B. Kaiser(1)
 
42,104,369
 
59.4%
P.O. Box 21468, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74121-1468
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
George Kaiser Family Foundation
 
4,775,534
 
6.7%
7020 South Yale, Suite 220, Tulsa, OK, 74136
 
 
 
 

(1)
Includes 327,121shares owned by Assurances Company II, LLC of which Mr. Kaiser is the sole member.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

As of February 28, 2014, there were 70,854,544 shares of common stock issued and outstanding. The following table sets forth, as of February 28, 2014, the beneficial ownership of common stock of BOK Financial by each director and nominee, the executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table appearing at page 41, and, as a group, all such persons and other executive officers not named in the table.

Name of Beneficial Owner
 
Amount & Nature of Beneficial Ownership(1)
 
 
Percent of Class(2)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Gregory S. Allen
 
4,576

(3)
 
*

Alan S. Armstrong
 
225

 
 
*

Norman P. Bagwell
 
33,385

(4)
 
*

C. Fred Ball, Jr.
 
22,052

(5)
 
*

Sharon J. Bell
 
78,177

(6)
 
*

Peter C. Boylan, III
 
5,070

(7)
 
*

Steven G. Bradshaw
 
90,319

(8)
 
*

Chester Cadieux, III
 
1,750

 
 
*

Charles E. Cotter
 
27,431

(9)
 
*

Joseph W. Craft, III
 
1,259

 
 
*

Daniel H. Ellinor
 
100,160

(10)
 
*

John W. Gibson
 
1,116

 
 
*

David F. Griffin
 
40,841

(11)
 
*

V. Burns Hargis
 
20,304

(12)
 
*

Douglas D. Hawthorne
 
2,864

(13)
 
*

E. Carey Joullian, IV
 
4,477

(14)
 
*

George B. Kaiser
 
42,104,369

(15)
 
59.4

Robert J. LaFortune
 
41,796

 
 
*

Stanley A. Lybarger
 
75,716

(16)
 
*

Steven J. Malcolm
 
2,242

(17)
 
*

Steven E. Nell
 
81,132

(18)
 
*

E.C. Richards
 
3,292

(19)
 
*

John Richels
 
275

 
 
*

Michael C. Turpen
 
738

(20)
 
*

R. A. Walker
 
20

 
 
*

 
 
 
 
 
 
All directors, nominees, and executive officers listed on page 24 (31 persons)
 
42,971,404

 
 
60.6
%

* Less than one percent (1%)

7


(1)
Except as otherwise indicated, all shares are beneficially owned and the sole investment and voting power is held by the person named.

(2)
All percentages are rounded to the nearest tenth, and are based upon the number of shares outstanding as of the date set forth above. For purposes of computing the percentages of the outstanding shares owned by the persons in the table, any shares such persons are deemed to own by having a right to acquire such shares by exercise of an option are included, but shares acquirable by other persons by the exercise of stock options are not included.

(3)
Includes 3,158 shares owned jointly by Mr. Allen and Elizabeth Allen. Also includes 1,418 shares of restricted stock.

(4)
Includes options to purchase 3,200 shares of BOK Financial common stock immediately exercisable or becoming exercisable within 60 days. Also includes 16,702 shares of restricted stock.

(5)
Includes options to purchase 10,143 shares of BOK Financial common stock immediately exercisable or becoming exercisable within 60 days. Also includes 5,267 shares owned by C. Fred Ball, Jr. IRA.

(6)
Includes 2,791 shares owned by Ms. Bell’s spouse, Gregory Allen Gray. Also includes 18,440 shares indirectly owned by the J. A. Chapman and Leta M. Chapman Trust (1949), of which Ms. Bell is individual trustee, and 21,329 shares indirectly owned by the Leta McFarlin Chapman Trust (1974), of which Ms. Bell is co-trustee.

(7)
Includes 2,000 shares indirectly owned by Boylan Capital Partners, LP and 3,070 shares indirectly owned by the Peter C. Boylan III Revocable Trust.

(8)
Includes 55,114 shares owned by the Steven G. Bradshaw Revocable Trust, of which Mr. Bradshaw and Marla Bradshaw are trustees, 32,652 shares of restricted stock, and 27 shares held in the BOK Thrift Plan.

(9)
Includes 27,410 shares owned by the Cotter Family Limited Partnership, and 21shares held in the BOK Thrift Plan.

(10)
Includes options to purchase 36,547 shares of BOK Financial common stock immediately exercisable or becoming exercisable within 60 days. Also includes 31,871 shares of restricted stock and 667 shares held in the BOK Thrift Plan.

(11)
Includes 38,903 shares indirectly owned by Doppler Investments, LP and 375 shares indirectly owned by the David F. Griffin Revocable Trust.

(12)
Includes 425 shares owned jointly by Mr. Hargis and Ann Hargis and 19,879 shares indirectly owned by Devonshire Holdings, LLC.

(13)
Includes 450 shares indirectly owned by Mr. Hawthorne’s wife’s partnership Tomahawk Springs, Ltd.

(14)
Includes 1,869 shares indirectly owned by JCAP, LLC.
    
(15)
Includes 327,121 shares indirectly owned by Assurances Company II, LLC, of which Mr. Kaiser is the sole member.


8


(16)
Includes 7,744 shares indirectly owned by Stanley A. Lybarger, IRA, 24,407 shares of restricted stock, and 27 shares held in the BOK Thrift Plan.

(17)
Includes 2,242 shares indirectly owned by the Steven J. Malcolm Revocable Trust.

(18)
Includes options to purchase 26,625 shares of BOK Financial common stock immediately exercisable or becoming exercisable within 60 days. Also includes 11,781 shares of restricted stock and 27 shares held in the BOK Thrift Plan.

(19)
Includes 2,427 shares indirectly owned by the Emmet C. Richards Revocable Trust and 865 shares owned by Core Investment Capital, LLC.

(20) Includes 738 shares owned jointly by Mr. Turpen and Susan Turpen.

9


PROPOSAL ONE

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Nominees and Vote Required to Elect Nominees

A board of twenty-two (22) directors is to be elected at the annual meeting. The nominees for director who receive a majority of shares voting “FOR” their election shall be elected as directors. You may vote the number of shares of common stock you own for up to twenty-two (22) persons. Unless you otherwise instruct by marking your proxy card, the proxy holders will vote the proxies received by them FOR the election of each of the twenty-two (22) nominees named below, unless you hold your shares in street name, in which case your broker is not permitted to use its discretion and those votes will constitute broker non-votes.

If at the time of the annual meeting any of the nominees is unwilling or unable to serve, all proxies received will be voted in favor of the remainder of those nominated and for such substitute nominees, if any, as shall be designated by the Board and nominated by any of the proxies named in the enclosed proxy form. We have no reason to believe that any of the nominees will be unable or unwilling to serve if elected.

Term of Office

The term of office of each person elected as a director will continue until the next annual meeting of shareholders or until his or her successor has been elected and qualified.

Family Relationships

There are no family relationships by blood, marriage or adoption between any director or executive officer of the company and any other director or executive officer of the company.

Information about Nominees

Certain information concerning the nominees to the Board of Directors of the company is set forth below based on information supplied by the nominees. All information is as of February 28, 2014. All references in this Proxy Statement to “BOKF” shall mean BOKF, National Association, the banking subsidiary of BOK Financial Corporation, which operates through the following regional divisions: Bank of Albuquerque, Bank of Arizona, Bank of Arkansas, Bank of Kansas City, Bank of Oklahoma (“BOK”), Bank of Texas (“BOT”), and Colorado State Bank and Trust. BOSC, Inc., a registered broker/dealer and registered investment adviser, is a wholly-owned subsidiary of BOK Financial Corporation. No other corporation or organization listed below is a parent, subsidiary, or other affiliate of BOK Financial Corporation unless otherwise indicated.






  


10




Name


Age
Principal Occupation and Business
Experience During Last 5 Years and
Directorships of Other Public Companies 
First Year Became a Director
 
 
 
 
Gregory S. Allen

51
Chief Executive Officer, Maine Street Holdings, Inc. (consulting firm to food industry). Mr. Allen retired from Advance Food Company Inc. in 2010, where he served as Chief Executive Officer from 2003. In addition, he is a director of American Fidelity Corporation (insurance holding company), Houston Baseball Partners, LLC (owner of baseball franchise and television cable network) and Airrosti Rehab Centers, LLC. We believe Mr. Allen’s qualifications to sit on our Board of Directors include his experience as an attorney and entrepreneur, as well as his management expertise.
2005
 
 
 
 
Alan S. Armstrong


51
Chief Executive Officer, President, and a Director of The Williams Companies, Inc. since January 2011. From 2002 until January 2011, Mr. Armstrong was Senior Vice President – Midstream and acted as President of Williams’ midstream business. Since January 2011, Mr. Armstrong has served as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Williams Partners GP LLC, the general partner of Williams Partners L.P. (subsidiaries of Williams), where he was Senior Vice President – Midstream from February 2010, and Chief Operating Officer and a director from 2005. We believe Mr. Armstrong’s qualifications to sit on our Board of Directors include his energy sector and management expertise.
2013
 
 
 
 
C. Fred Ball, Jr.
69
Senior Chairman of BOT, and formerly its Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, and President. Before joining BOT in 1997, Mr. Ball was Executive Vice President of Comerica Bank-Texas and later President of Comerica Securities, Inc. He is a director of Mid-Con Energy LP. We believe Mr. Ball’s qualifications to sit on our Board of Directors include his almost four decades of experience in the banking industry and his involvement with the Texas market.
1999
 
 
 
 
Sharon J. Bell
62
Attorney and Managing Partner, Rogers and Bell PLLC (Tulsa, Oklahoma); Trustee and General Counsel, Chapman-McFarlin Interests. Ms. Bell was formerly a Director and President of Red River Oil Company (oil and gas exploration and development). We believe Ms. Bell’s qualifications to sit on our Board of Directors include her experience as an attorney and trustee, and leadership skills demonstrated through her civic involvement.
1993
 
 
 
 
Peter C. Boylan, III
50
Co-Founder, Chairman, and Chief Executive Officer of Cypress Energy Holdings, LLC (an environmental and water solutions company serving the energy industry). Mr. Boylan was previously Chief Executive Officer of Boylan Partners, LLC (investment and advisory services) since early 2002. From 1994 through 2002, Mr. Boylan served in a variety of senior executive management positions of various public and private companies controlled by Liberty Media Corporation, including serving as a board member, Chairman, CEO, President, COO, and CFO of several different companies. Mr. Boylan serves as a director of MRC Global, Inc., a distribution company serving the energy and other industries. We believe Mr. Boylan’s qualifications to sit on our Board of Directors include his extensive corporate executive management and leadership experience, including accounting, finance, audit, risk, and compensation committee expertise, media and technology expertise, civic service, and experience with public boards of directors.
2005

11


Steven G. Bradshaw




54
President and Chief Executive Officer of BOK Financial and BOKF, effective January 1, 2014. Previously, Mr. Bradshaw served as Senior Executive Vice President of BOKF, responsible for Colorado State Bank and Trust and Bank of Kansas City, International Banking, Treasury Services, Consumer Banking, Wealth Management, BOKF Mortgage and Community Development, Business Banking, and Chairman of BOSC, Inc. We believe Mr. Bradshaw’s qualifications to sit on our Board of Directors include his years of leadership at BOKF and extensive knowledge of all aspects of our business.
nominee
 
 
 
 
Chester E. Cadieux, III
47
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of QuikTrip Corporation (a gasoline and retail convenience chain) since 2002. Mr. Cadieux previously served as Vice President of Sales at QuikTrip Corporation. We believe Mr. Cadieux’s qualifications to sit on our Board of Directors include his knowledge of finance and accounting, his management experience, and his knowledge of all of our geographic markets.
2005
 
 
 
 
Joseph W. Craft, III
63
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. (a diversified coal producer and marketer) since 1999. Mr. Craft also serves as Chairman, President, Director and Chief Executive Officer of Alliance Holdings GP, L.P. Previously, Mr. Craft served as President of MAPCO Coal Inc. since 1986. We believe Mr. Craft’s qualifications to sit on our Board of Directors include his extensive experience in corporate leadership, as well as his public company experience.
2007
 
 
 
 
Daniel H. Ellinor


52
Chief Operating Officer of BOK Financial and BOKF, effective January 1, 2014. Mr. Ellinor previously served as Senior Executive Vice President of BOKF, responsible for Bank of Arizona, Bank of Albuquerque, and Bank of Arkansas, Commercial Real Estate and Energy Lending, Oklahoma Commercial Banking, and TransFund. We believe Mr. Ellinor’s qualifications to sit on our Board of Directors include his experience in leadership roles at BOKF and extensive knowledge of all facets of our business.
nominee
 
 
 
 
John W. Gibson
61
Non-executive Chairman of ONEOK, Inc. and ONEOK Partners GP, L.L.C., the general partner of ONEOK Partners, L.P and ONE Gas Inc. He has served as the CEO of ONEOK, Inc. since 2007 and was appointed Chairman of the Board in May 2011. He served as the President and CEO of ONEOK, Inc. from 2010 through 2011, Chairman and CEO of ONEOK Partners GP, L.L.C. since 2007, and Chairman, President, and CEO from 2010 through 2011. Mr. Gibson joined ONEOK, Inc. in May 2000 from Koch Energy, Inc., a subsidiary of Koch Industries, where he was an Executive Vice President. We believe Mr. Gibson’s qualifications to sit on our Board of Directors include his extensive executive leadership and management experience and his involvement in the energy industry.
2008

12


David F. Griffin
48
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Griffin Capital, L.L.C. President and Chief Executive Officer, Griffin Communications, L.L.C. (owns and operates CBS- and CW-affiliated television stations plus associated websites in Oklahoma). Mr. Griffin was formerly President and General Manager, KWTV-9 (Oklahoma City). We believe Mr. Griffin’s qualifications to sit on our Board of Directors include his significant expertise, experience, and background in corporate management and his involvement with both the Oklahoma City and Tulsa markets.
2003
 
 
 
 
V. Burns Hargis
68
President, Oklahoma State University. Prior to becoming OSU President, Mr. Hargis served as Vice Chairman, BOK Financial and BOK and Director of BOSC, Inc. since 1993. Mr. Hargis was formerly Attorney and Shareholder of the law firm of McAfee & Taft (Oklahoma City, Oklahoma). He is also a director of Chesapeake Energy Corporation. We believe Mr. Hargis’ qualifications to sit on our Board of Directors include his nearly three decades practicing law with a focus on financial reporting and litigation, including representing financial institutions and their boards, as well as having served for many years as our Vice Chairman.
1993
 
 
 
 
Douglas D. Hawthorne


66
Chief Executive Officer, Texas Health Resources. Prior to helping create Texas Health Resources in 1997, Mr. Hawthorne was CEO of Presbyterian Healthcare Systems. We believe Mr. Hawthorne’s qualifications to sit on our Board of Directors include his knowledge of the healthcare sector and of the Texas market.
2013
 
 
 
 
E. Carey Joullian, IV
53
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Mustang Fuel Corporation and subsidiaries; President and Manager, Joullian & Co., L.L.C.; Manager, JCAP, L.L.C. We believe Mr. Joullian’s qualifications to sit on our Board of Directors include his significant experience and expertise in the oil and gas industry and his expertise in accounting.
1995
 
 
 
 
George B. Kaiser
71
Chairman of the Board and majority shareholder of BOK Financial and BOKF; President, Chief Executive Officer, and principal owner of GBK Corporation, parent of Kaiser-Francis Oil Company (independent oil and gas exploration and production company); founder of Excelerate Energy and Argonaut Private Equity. We believe Mr. Kaiser’s qualifications to sit on our Board of Directors include his four decades of executive leadership in the oil and gas industry, his broad perspective gained from involvement in diverse industries, his knowledge of our business, and his interest as the majority owner of our company.
1990
 
 
 
 
Robert J. LaFortune
87
Self-employed in the investment and management of personal financial holdings. Mr. LaFortune is also a director of Apco International Oil & Gas, Inc. We believe Mr. LaFortune’s qualifications to sit on our Board of Directors include his years of public service, including serving as mayor of the City of Tulsa, as well as his experience on other boards and their audit committees.
1993

13


Stanley A. Lybarger
64
Former President and Chief Executive Officer of BOK Financial and BOKF. Mr. Lybarger was previously President of BOK Oklahoma City Regional Office and Executive Vice President of BOK with responsibility for corporate banking. We believe Mr. Lybarger’s qualifications to sit on our Board of Directors include his prior role as our Chief Executive Officer, his three decades of leadership positions with BOKF, and his extensive knowledge of all facets of the banking industry.
1991
 
 
 
 
Steven J. Malcolm
65
Retired Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of The Williams Companies, Inc. (energy holding company) and Williams Partners L.P. Mr. Malcolm was previously President and Chief Executive Officer of Williams Energy Services after serving as senior vice president and general manager of Midstream Gas and Liquids for Williams Energy Services. In December 2011, Mr. Malcolm became a director of ONEOK, Inc. and ONEOK Partners. We believe Mr. Malcolm’s qualifications to sit on our Board of Directors include his experience in the energy sector as well as his public company and executive management expertise.
2002
 
 
 
 
E.C. Richards
64
Managing Member of Core Investment Capital, LLC. Prior to September 1999, Mr. Richards served as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer for Sooner Pipe Corporation (distributor of tubular products worldwide with domestic and international operations), a subsidiary of Oil States International. Mr. Richards previously served on the BOK Financial Board of Directors from 1997 through 2001. We believe Mr. Richards’ qualifications to sit on our Board of Directors include his diverse background in the private equity and distribution industries and his civic involvement.
2008
 
 
 
 
John Richels


63
President and Chief Executive Officer of Devon Energy Corporation since June 2010. Mr. Richels joined the board of directors of Devon in 2007. He has served as president of Devon since 2004, and prior to 2004 was senior vice president of Devon and president and chief executive officer of Devon’s Canadian subsidiary. Mr. Richels joined Devon through its 1998 acquisition of Canadian-based Northstar Energy Corporation, where he held the office of executive vice president and chief financial officer. Prior to joining Northstar, Mr. Richels was managing and chief operating partner of the Canadian-based national law firm, Bennett Jones. We believe Mr. Richels’ qualifications to sit on our Board of Directors include his experience in the energy sector and his legal expertise.
2013
 
 
 
 
Michael C. Turpen
64
Partner at the law firm of Riggs, Abney, Neal, Turpen, Orbison & Lewis in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. Mr. Turpen previously served as Attorney General for the State of Oklahoma. We believe Mr. Turpen’s qualifications to sit on our Board of Directors include his legal expertise, his public service experience, and leadership skills demonstrated through extensive involvement with non-profit boards and organizations.
2011

14


R. A. Walker
57
Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer of Anadarko Petroleum Corporation. Mr. Walker was named Chairman in May 2013, having been named CEO in May 2012. He previously served as President and Chief Operating Officer since February 2010, and was Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from 2005 until his appointment as COO. Mr. Walker is a director of CenterPoint Energy, Inc., Western Gas Equity Holdings, LLC, and serves on the boards and executive committees of the American Petroleum Institute and America’s Natural Gas Alliance. We believe Mr. Walker’s qualifications to sit on our Board of Directors include his knowledge of the energy sector and his public company expertise.
2013

The Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR the twenty-two nominees.



15


PROPOSAL TWO
RATIFICATION OF SELECTION OF AUDITOR
Ernst & Young LLP began serving as the Company’s independent auditor since its inception on October 24, 1990. The Audit Committee has selected Ernst & Young LLP as our independent auditor for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2014.

While we are not required to do so, the Company is submitting the selection of Ernst & Young LLP to serve as our independent auditor for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2014, for ratification in order to ascertain the views of our shareholders on this appointment. If the selection is not ratified, the Audit Committee will reconsider its selection. Representatives of Ernst & Young LLP are expected to participate in the annual meeting, will be available to answer shareholder questions and will have the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so.

The Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR the ratification of the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as the independent auditor of BOK Financial and its subsidiaries for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2014.

16


PROPOSAL THREE
ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE THE COMPENSATION OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Pursuant to Section 951 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”), which added a new section 14A to the Securities Exchange Act, shareholders can vote to approve, not less frequently than once every three years, the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers disclosed in the Proxy Statement. This is commonly known as a “say on pay” vote.  This allows our shareholders the opportunity to communicate annually to the Board of Directors their views on the compensation of our named executive officers through the following resolution:
“RESOLVED, that the compensation paid to the company’s named executive officers, as disclosed in this Proxy Statement pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and narrative discussion, is hereby APPROVED.”
We are asking you to vote for the above resolution approving the compensation of our named executive officers. This vote is advisory in nature and non-binding; however, the Board of Directors will consider the shareholder vote when making future decisions regarding executive compensation. Our “say on pay” vote is included in our Proxy Statement every year, and the next vote on the frequency of the “say on pay” proposal will be during the 2017 proxy season.

The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of common stock, present in person or by proxy, voted at the meeting, is required for the advisory approval of this resolution.

The Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR the approval of the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers as disclosed in this Proxy Statement.


17


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Director Compensation

All non-officer directors of BOK Financial and BOKF previously received a single retainer of 50 shares of BOK Financial common stock per quarter, and in the second quarter of 2013 began receiving a retainer of 75 shares per quarter, in accordance with the BOK Financial Directors Stock Compensation Plan, whether serving on one or both of the Boards of Directors. Director compensation shares are issued to each director on or before the 15th day following the end of each calendar quarter during which such director served as a member of the Board of Directors of BOK Financial or BOKF.

All non-officer directors are also paid $750 in cash for each Board of Directors meeting attended (increased from $500 in the second quarter of 2013), $500 in cash for each committee meeting attended (provided only one fee is paid when two or more committees meet contemporaneously), and $1,500 in cash for each committee meeting chaired (increased from $1,000 in the second quarter of 2013). No such fees are paid for meetings not attended. In addition, the Chairman of the Risk Committee and the Audit Committee receives $250 for each quarterly earnings release conference and upon application to, and subject to the discretion of, the Audit Committee, $250 for each additional substantive conference with the Company's independent auditors. Non-officer Company directors were paid the following in 2013:

Name(1)
Fees Earned or
Paid in Cash
($)

Stock Awards(2)
($)

Total
($)
Gregory S. Allen
10,500
15,387.08
25,887.08
Alan S. Armstrong
9,250
9,553.28
18,803.28
Sharon J. Bell
9,250
15,387.08
24,637.08
Peter C. Boylan, III
15,250
15,387.08
30,637.08
Chester Cadieux, III
12,500
15,387.08
27,887.08
Joseph W. Craft
14,000
15,387.08
29,387.08
William E. Durrett
500
5,833.80
6,333.80
John W. Gibson
10,750
15,387.08
26,137.08
David F. Griffin
23,250
15,387.08
38,637.08
V. Burns Hargis
11,750
15,387.08
27,137.08
Douglas D. Hawthorne
3,750
9,553.28
13,303.28
E. Carey Joullian, IV
19,000
15,387.08
34,387.08
Robert J. LaFortune
9,750
15,387.08
25,137.08
Steven J. Malcolm
11,250
15,387.08
26,637.08
E.C. Richards
9,500
15,387.08
24,887.08
John Richels
3,500
12,674.78
16,174.78
Michael C. Turpen
8,000
15,387.08
23,387.08
R. A. Walker
10,286.48
1,266.80
11,553.28

(1)
George B. Kaiser, a non-officer director, is not listed as he does not receive payment for serving as a director.
    
(2)
The BOK Financial Directors Stock Compensation Plan provides that the issuance price for the director compensation shares is the average of the mid-points between the highest price and the lowest price at which trades occurred on NASDAQ on the five trading days immediately preceding the end of the calendar quarter. Director shares were granted in 2013 at the following prices: first quarter, $62.43; second quarter, $63.34; third quarter, $64.04; and fourth quarter, $65.83. The Stock Awards column reflects payments made in 2013 for service in the fourth quarter of 2012 (director shares granted at $54.25) and the first three quarters of 2013. The total BOK Financial common stock owned by each director as of February 28, 2014 may be found in the Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management table on page 7.

18


Attendance of Meetings

The entire Board of Directors of BOK Financial met four times during 2013.  All directors of BOK Financial attended at least 75% of all meetings of the Board of Directors and committees on which they served.  Although BOK Financial does not have a policy with respect to attendance by the directors at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders, directors are encouraged to attend.  Thirteen of the twenty members of the Board of Directors attended the 2013 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.  The Board of Directors intends to meet at least four times in 2014.

Director Nominations

While the Board of Directors does not have a standing nomination committee, director candidates identified by management and members of the Board of Directors are discussed regularly at Board of Directors meetings. The Board has adopted a written policy on qualifications of directors, which states that directors will have all of the following characteristics: (i) impeccable integrity, (ii) strong sense of professionalism, and (iii) capability of serving the interests of stockholders, along with several of the following characteristics: (i) prominence in the community, (ii) ability to represent the views of under-represented constituencies in the Company’s market areas, (iii) financial analytical skill and expertise, and (iv) vision for social trends.

While the policy on director qualifications does not formally require diversity on the Board and the Company does not have a diversity policy, the policy states that the Board should encompass a diverse range of skill and expertise sufficient to provide prudent guidance to the Company, and have the right mix of characteristics and talents for the optimal functioning of the Board in its oversight of the Company. In considering a particular nominee, the Board will consider, in addition to the qualifications and characteristics described above, whether the potential director assists in achieving a mix of Board members that represents a diversity of background, perspective, and experience, including with respect to age, gender, race, place of residence, and specialized expertise.

The Board of Directors will consider director candidates recommended by stockholders if provided with the following: (i) evidence in accordance with Rule 14a-8 of compliance with stockholder eligibility requirements, (ii) the written consent of the candidate(s) for nomination as a director and verification as to the accuracy of the biographical and other information submitted in support of the candidate, (iii) a resume or other written statement of the qualifications of the candidate(s) for nomination as a director, and (iv) all information regarding the candidate(s) and the submitting stockholder that would be required to be disclosed in a proxy statement filed with the SEC if the candidate(s) were nominated for election to the Board of Directors. Any recommendations received from stockholders will be evaluated in the same manner that potential nominees suggested by Board members, management or other parties are evaluated. The Board of Directors encourages stockholder director candidate recommendations.

Any stockholder that wishes to present a director candidate for consideration should submit the information identified above pursuant to the procedures set forth below under “Communication with the Board of Directors” on page 21.

Director Independence

The Board of Directors has determined that BOK Financial is a “controlled company,” as defined in Rule 5615(c)(1) of the NASDAQ listing standards, based on Mr. Kaiser's beneficial ownership of approximately 59.4% of the outstanding common stock. Accordingly, BOK Financial is exempt from certain requirements of the NASDAQ listing standards, including the requirement to maintain a majority of independent directors on the Company's Board of Directors and the requirements regarding the determination

19


of compensation of executive officers and the nomination of directors by independent directors. Nevertheless, the Company does maintain a substantial majority of independent directors, determines upper level management compensation through an independent board committee, and nominates new board members through board consensus. Further, the Audit Committee is comprised solely of independent board members. Further discussion regarding determination of independence may be found in the sections entitled “Audit Committee” and “Independent Compensation Committee” herein.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

No voting member of the Compensation Committee has served as an officer of the Company, including its affiliates, at any time. None of our executive officers serves as a member of the Compensation Committee of any other company that has an executive officer serving as a member of the Company’s Board of Directors. None of our executive officers serves as a member of the board of directors of any other company that has an executive officer serving as a member of our Board’s Compensation Committee.

Committees of the Board of Directors

The Risk Committee, Audit Committee, Independent Compensation Committee, and Credit Committee are described below.

Risk Committee

During 2013, the Board of Directors of BOK Financial had a standing Risk Committee comprised solely of independent directors. The Risk Committee has the responsibility, among other things, for overseeing the Company’s enterprise-wide risk management, capital planning and adequacy, liquidity, corporate-wide policies and procedures, insurance coverage, mergers and acquisitions, alternative investments and innovations, information technology and operations risk, counterparty risk and vendor management. 

The members of the Risk Committee in 2013 were Messrs. Cadieux (Chairman), Boylan, Hawthorne, and Walker, and Ms. Bell. The Risk Committee held five meetings in fiscal 2013.

Audit Committee

The Audit Committee is responsible for oversight of the accounting and financial reporting processes of the Company, the selection and reporting of the Company’s independent auditors, the audits of the financial statements of the Company, related party reporting (other than related party credit transactions overseen by the Credit Committee), reports of internal audit, compliance with laws and regulations and reports of examination from regulators. 

The members of the Audit Committee in 2013 were Messrs. Joullian (Chairman), Craft, Gibson, Malcolm, and Richels. The Board of Directors designated Mr. Joullian as its "audit committee financial expert," as defined in Item 407(d) of Regulation S-K. All the members of the Audit Committee are “independent” as defined in Rule 5605(a)(2) of the NASDAQ listing standards. Director independence is determined through the procedures described under “Related Party Transaction Review and Approval Policy” herein. The Audit Committee held seven meetings in fiscal 2013. The Report of the Audit Committee is on page 22 of this Proxy Statement.





20


Independent Compensation Committee

In December 2002, the Board of Directors established an Independent Compensation Committee, consisting of independent directors, to administer a performance-based compensation plan for senior executives in accordance with the provisions of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code. The Independent Compensation Committee has a charter, which is available on the Company’s website at www.bokf.com. The Independent Compensation Committee consists of Messrs. Allen (Chairman), Cadieux (non-voting), Craft, Griffin (non-voting), Kaiser (non-voting) and Malcolm. The Committee held three meetings in fiscal 2013. Compensation of the Chief Executive Officer, the direct reports to the Chief Executive Officer, and other officers participating in the Company’s Executive Incentive Plan are approved by the Independent Compensation Committee. The Committee does not delegate this authority. Compensation for all other officers is, in practice, determined by the Chief Executive Officer and Mr. Kaiser, the Chairman of the Board. The Independent Compensation Committee Report on Executive Compensation and the Compensation Discussion and Analysis may be found on pages 39 and 26 respectively.

Credit Committee

The purpose of the Credit Committee is to review and report to the Board of Directors regarding the quality of the Company’s credit portfolio and trends affecting the credit portfolio. It also oversees the effectiveness and administration of credit-related policies and related party credit transactions, and reviews the appropriateness of the allowance for loan losses and accrual for off-balance sheet credit losses. The members of the Credit Committee are Messrs. Griffin (Chairman), Armstrong, Boylan, Craft, Hargis, Kaiser, LaFortune, Lybarger, Richards, and Turpen. The Credit Committee met eleven times during 2013 and plans to meet at least eleven times in 2014.

Independent Director Meetings

The Board of Directors has adopted a policy of regularly scheduled executive sessions where independent directors meet separately from management. The independent directors plan to meet in executive session after all regularly scheduled Board of Directors meetings. The independent directors held three executive sessions during 2013. The presiding director at the executive sessions is Mr. Kaiser. Stockholders of the Company may communicate their concerns to the non-management directors in accordance with the procedures described below under "Communication with the Board of Directors."

Communication with the Board of Directors

The Board of Directors of BOK Financial believes that it is important for stockholders to have a process to send communications to the Board. Accordingly, stockholders who wish to communicate with the Board of Directors, or a particular director, may do so by sending a letter to the Director of Investor Relations of BOK Financial at P.O. Box 2300, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74192. The mailing envelope should contain a clear notation indicating that the enclosed letter is a "Stockholder-Board Communication" or "Stockholder-Director Communication." Such letters should identify the author as a stockholder and state whether the intended recipients are all members of the Board of Directors or certain specified individual directors. The Director of Investor Relations and the General Counsel will independently review the content of the letters. Communications which are constructive suggestions for the conduct of the business or policies of the Company will be promptly delivered to the identified director or directors. Communications which are complaints about specific incidents involving banking or brokerage service will be directed to the appropriate business unit for review. Director nominations will be reviewed for compliance with the requirements identified in the section of this proxy entitled “Director Nominations,” and if meeting such requirements, promptly forwarded to the director or directors identified in the communication.

21


Report of the Audit Committee    

In 2013, the Audit Committee (the “Committee”) oversaw the Company’s financial reporting process on behalf of the Board of Directors. The Company’s management has the primary responsibility for the financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for assessing the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, the Committee discussed and reviewed the audited consolidated financial statements included in the Annual Report with management, including a discussion of the quality, not just the acceptability, of the accounting policies, reasonableness of significant judgments, and the clarity of disclosures in the financial statements.

The Committee reviewed with Ernst & Young LLP, the independent registered public accounting firm, their opinion on the conformity of the audited consolidated financial statements with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. This discussion included their judgments as to the quality, not just the acceptability, of the Company's accounting policies, and other matters as required to be discussed with the Committee by the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB), including PCAOB Auditing Standard No. 16, Communications with Audit Committees, the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission and other applicable regulations. In addition, the Committee has discussed with Ernst & Young LLP the firm’s independence from the Company, including matters in the firm’s independence letter required by the PCAOB, and considered the compatibility of any non-audit services with the firm’s independence.

The Committee also reviewed and discussed with management and Ernst & Young LLP the results of management’s assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, and the firm’s audit of internal control over financial reporting. The Committee meets at least quarterly with the Company's internal auditors and Ernst & Young LLP, with and without management present, regarding the overall scope and plans for their respective audits and the results of those audits, including their evaluations of internal control over financial reporting and the overall quality of the Company’s financial reporting.

The Committee is governed by a charter. Each of the members of the Committee qualifies as an “independent” Director under the current NASDAQ listing standards and Rule 10A-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Board of Directors has appointed E. Carey Joullian IV as the “audit committee financial expert”.

In reliance on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Committee recommended to the Board of Directors, and the Board has approved, that the audited consolidated financial statements and management’s assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting be included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

The Committee and the Board have also recommended, subject to shareholder approval, the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2014.

E. Carey Joullian IV, Audit Committee Chairman
Joseph W. Craft, III
John W. Gibson
Steven J. Malcolm
John Richels


22


Principal Accountant Fees and Services

Audit Fees. Fees paid to Ernst & Young LLP (“EY”) for the audit of the annual consolidated financial statements included in BOK Financial’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, for the review of the consolidated financial statements included in BOK Financial’s Forms 10-Q for the quarters included in the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 and various subsidiary audits were $1,548,015 and $1,063,200 respectively.

Audit-Related Fees. Fees paid to EY for SOC 1 reports and other audit-related functions were $102,103 and $62,000 respectively, for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012.

Tax Fees. Fees paid to EY associated with tax return review and tax planning were $66,016 and $54,547 respectively, for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012.

All Other Fees. Fees paid to EY for other services were $263,644 and $6,000, for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012.

The Audit Committee has a policy on auditor independence requiring the approval by the Committee of all professional services rendered by BOK Financial’s independent auditor prior to the commencement of the specified services. The services described in ”Audit Fees”, “Audit-Related Fees”, “Tax Fees” and “All Other Fees” were all approved by the Audit Committee in accordance with BOK Financial’s policy on auditor independence and approval of fees.

Board Leadership Structure

The positions of Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board are not held by the same person. Mr. Bradshaw, the current Chief Executive Officer, brings Company-specific experience and expertise to the role, as did Mr. Lybarger, who held the position of Chief Executive Officer for fiscal 2013, while Mr. Kaiser, the Chairman of the Board, brings experience, oversight, and expertise from outside the Company and industry. Mr. Kaiser is also the majority shareholder of BOK Financial, giving him additional incentive to ensure the success of the Company. Keeping the positions of CEO and Chairman separate allows the CEO to focus on our day-to-day business, while allowing the Chairman to lead the Board in its fundamental role of providing advice to, and independent oversight of, management. The Board believes that having separate CEO and Chairman positions and having an independent outside director serve as Chairman is the appropriate leadership structure for the Company at this time, given the characteristics and circumstances of the Company, and demonstrates our commitment to good corporate governance. It provides the appropriate balance between strategy development and independent oversight of management.

Board Role in Oversight of Risk

The Board has an active role, as a whole and also at the committee level (as disclosed in the descriptions of the committees in this Proxy Statement), in overseeing management of the Company’s risks. The full Board maintains responsibility for general oversight of strategic risks, and regularly reviews information regarding the Company’s credit, liquidity and operations, as well as the risks associated with each. The Company’s Independent Compensation Committee is responsible for overseeing the management of risks relating to the Company’s compensation policies and programs. The Risk Committee manages enterprise-wide risk management programs including capital planning, liquidity, interest rate, and operations risk. The Audit Committee manages risks associated with accounting and financial reporting, internal controls, and compliance with legal and regulatory requirements. The Credit Committee manages risks associated with the Company’s credit portfolio and credit-related policies. While each committee is responsible for evaluating certain risks and overseeing the management of such risks, the entire Board of Directors oversees

23


overall strategic and reputational risks, and is regularly informed through committee reports and reports directly from officers responsible for oversight of various risks within the Company.

Executive Officers

Certain information concerning the executive officers of BOK Financial and its subsidiaries, as determined pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 3b-7, is set forth below:

Norman P. Bagwell, age 51, is Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of BOT, with responsibility for the regional markets (those outside Oklahoma), which includes all lines of business in those markets, with specific emphasis on commercial lending. Mr. Bagwell has over 25 years of banking experience in Texas. Prior to joining BOT in 2008, he served as President of the Dallas Region for JPMorgan Chase, and previously served as President of the Dallas Region for Bank One.  

C. Fred Ball, Jr., age 69, is Senior Chairman of BOT. Mr. Ball was previously Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, and President of BOT with responsibility for banking activities in Texas for BOK Financial. Before joining BOT in 1997, he was Executive Vice President of Comerica Bank-Texas and later President of Comerica Securities, Inc.

Steven G. Bradshaw, age 54, is President and Chief Executive Officer of BOK Financial and BOKF. Previously, he was Senior Executive Vice President of BOKF, responsible for Colorado State Bank and Trust and Bank of Kansas City, International Banking, Treasury Services, Consumer Banking, Wealth Management, BOKF Mortgage and Community Development, Business Banking, and Chairman of BOSC, Inc. Before joining BOK Financial, Mr. Bradshaw spent six years managing the brokerage operation at Sooner Federal. Mr. Bradshaw has been with BOKF since 1991.

Daniel H. Ellinor, age 52, is Chief Operating Officer of BOK Financial and BOKF, responsible for commercial lending activities across all markets and lines of business. Previously, he was Senior Executive Vice President of BOKF, responsible for Bank of Arizona, Bank of Albuquerque, and Bank of Arkansas, Commercial Real Estate and Energy Lending, Oklahoma Commercial Banking, and TransFund. Before joining BOK Financial in 2003, Mr. Ellinor served as regional president for Compass Bank in Dallas, where he oversaw Compass’ North Texas operations. Prior to that time, Mr. Ellinor was Bank of America’s market executive for the North Texas Commercial Banking Division.

Scott B. Grauer, age 49, is Executive Vice President, Wealth Management and Chief Executive Officer of BOSC, Inc. He was named president and CEO of the firm and assumed responsibilities for retail, institutional and investment banking activities when BOK Financial first combined these units under one organization. Previously, he was manager of BOSC retail. Mr. Grauer joined BOK Financial in 1991.

Stephen D. Grossi, age 50, is Executive Vice President and Chief Human Resource Officer. Before joining BOK Financial, Mr. Grossi was Senior Vice President with PNC Financial Services, where he led human resource efforts related to large acquisitions and realignments, workforce planning, organizational change, compensation and benefits, as well as talent acquisition and development. He joined BOK Financial in 2011.

John C. Morrow, age 58, is Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer. He joined BOK Financial in 1993. He was previously with Ernst & Young LLP for 10 years.


24


Stacy C. Kymes, age 43, is Executive Vice President and Chief Credit Officer of BOKF, and Manager of the Credit Administration Division.  Previously Mr. Kymes acted for BOKF as Assistant Chief Credit Officer, Director of Mergers & Acquisitions, Treasurer, Corporate Controller and Chief Auditor.  Mr. Kymes joined BOKF in 1996.  Prior to joining BOKF, Mr. Kymes was with KPMG LLP. 

Steven E. Nell, age 52, is Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer for BOK Financial and BOKF. Mr. Nell previously served as Senior Vice President and Corporate Controller for BOK Financial. Before joining BOK Financial in 1992, Mr. Nell was with Ernst & Young LLP for eight years.

Donald T. Parker, age 53, is Executive Vice President, Chief Risk Officer, and Chief Information Officer of BOK Financial. Mr. Parker joined BOK Financial in 2005. He previously served as Senior Vice President and Director of Information Services of Comerica Bank, a position he held from 1999 to 2005. Prior to joining Comerica Bank, Mr. Parker was a Senior Vice President and General Manager of Consolidation Services at National City Incorporated in Cleveland, Ohio.

Patrick E. Piper, age 54, is Executive Vice President, Consumer Banking Services. Mr. Piper has been with BOK Financial since 1982.



25


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Executive Compensation Program Overview

The BOK Financial executive compensation program is designed to attract and retain executives whose judgment, leadership abilities and special efforts result in successful operations for the Company and an increase in shareholder value. Various components of the program work together to:

Reward sustained, above peer performance
Encourage both individual performance and teamwork
Link compensation to operational results
Align executive interests with shareholder interests
Keep BOK Financial compensation competitive with peer banks
Create long-term commitment to the Company

The BOK Financial executive compensation program includes:

Salary
Executive Incentive Compensation (annual and long-term)
401(k) Plan
Deferred Compensation
True-Up Plan

In 2002, the Board of Directors established the Independent Compensation Committee (for purposes of this discussion and analysis, the “Committee”) to administer performance-based compensation plans for senior executives in accordance with the provisions of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code. The Committee, the voting members of which are independent within the meaning of 162(m), has responsibility for establishing, implementing and approving the Company’s general compensation philosophy with regard to the senior executive officers who participate in the Company’s Executive Incentive Plan (referred to as the “Executive Incentive Plan” or the “Plan”) which was approved by shareholders in 2003 and last amended and approved by shareholders in 2013. The Committee receives guidance from the Chief Executive Officer (the “CEO”), who assists in evaluating employee performance, recommending business performance targets and objectives and suggesting salary levels and awards for executives (other than himself).

Throughout this proxy statement, the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and the other individuals included in the Summary Compensation Table on page 41 are referred to as the “named executives.”

2013 Executive Compensation Summary

Preparation for Succession of Stanley A. Lybarger, Chief Executive Officer

After forty years with the Company, Mr. Lybarger retired from his position as President and Chief Executive Officer effective December 31, 2013. As a result, several of the Company’s existing executive management team assumed new roles and responsibilities. Throughout 2013, the Committee worked to create incentive packages for executive officers that reflected these new roles and responsibilities and promoted retention of these key executives. The Committee considered executive positions, experience and comparable peer group compensation to establish a salary and incentive compensation structure for each executive officer for 2014.
    

26


Preparation for the True-Up Payout and Post True-Up Compensation

The purpose of the True-Up Plan, which was approved by shareholders in 2011, is to address inequity in annual and long-term incentive which may result from the anticipated earnings per share percentile “bounce-back” by peer banks that performed poorly during the recent economic anomaly. The True-Up Plan is designed to allow for the restoration of the Company’s named executives’ and certain other executive officers’ annual and long-term compensation to levels comparable to that of executives at the peer banks with comparative earnings per share performance from years 2006 through 2013 (the “True-Up Period”). Conversely, the True-Up Plan also provides for the repayment by the Company’s named executives and certain other executive officers those amounts paid to them during the True-Up Period which exceed compensation paid to named executives at the peer banks who had comparative earnings. True-Up payments will be determined as of December 31, 2103 based on proxy statement and financial data that will be published by peer banks during the first quarter of 2014. The final amount due under the 2011 True-Up Plan will be distributed on or before May 31, 2014.

In anticipation of the True-Up Plan ending in 2013, in 2012 the Committee evaluated all components of the existing Executive Incentive Plan.  The Committee determined that the Company would benefit from amending the Executive Incentive Plan to provide an executive compensation plan that is designed to attract and retain executives whose judgment, leadership abilities and special efforts result in successful operations for the Company and an increase in shareholder value.  The Board of Directors received shareholder approval of the amended Executive Incentive Plan at the 2013 annual meeting of shareholders to be effective January 1, 2014. Various components of the plan work together to reward sustained, above peer performance, encouraging both individual performance and teamwork and aligning executive interest with shareholder interest.  

Committee Consideration of Say-On-Pay

Also in 2013, the Committee considered the results of the advisory vote by shareholders on the “say-on-pay” proposal presented to shareholders at the April 30, 2013 annual meeting. As reported in the Company’s Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on May 3, 2013, there was significant support by shareholders for the compensation program offered to the Company’s named executive officers. Accordingly, the Committee made no direct changes to the Company’s executive compensation program as a result of the say-on-pay vote. The Company’s executive compensation program continued to focus on pay for performance, as exhibited by the amendments to the Executive Incentive Plan noted above, aligning executive interests with those of the Company’s shareholders, achieving a balance between annual and long-term incentives and monitoring for the creation of improper risk incentives.
Promoting Long-Term Growth and Discouraging Excessive Risk Taking

Review and Oversight of Risk

In 2010, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the Federal Reserve Board of Governors and other regulatory agencies issued Interagency Guidance on Sound Incentive Compensation Policies (the “Compensation Guidance”). In response, Company management formed a review committee consisting of members from human resources, audit, risk, accounting, finance, legal, compliance and the various business lines (the “Incentive Risk Review Committee”). The Incentive Risk Review Committee undertook review of all the compensation policies of the Company in accordance with the Compensation Guidance. The Compensation Guidance required the Company to assess the balance of risk and reward in all compensation plans, the effectiveness of controls and risk management and the effectiveness of corporate governance, including Board of Director oversight. The Incentive Risk Review Committee reported to the Committee

27


that the Company plans, (1) had a satisfactory balance of risk and reward and (2) that controls, risk management and corporate governance were adequate.
        
Significant Equity Ownership

All long-term executive compensation is paid in stock options or restricted stock. The stock ownership guideline for the CEO is 75,000 shares of BOK Financial stock. The stock ownership guideline for all other named executives is 25,000 shares of BOK Financial stock. Executives may not sell any shares received as compensation until such time as the ownership guidelines are achieved. The result is that BOK Financial executive officers own, and must continue to hold, a significant amount of BOK Financial stock at all times. For a further accounting of BOK Financial named executive equity ownership see page 7.
Shareholder and Chief Executive Officer Emphasis on Long-Term Success

Mr. George Kaiser, the largest BOK Financial shareholder and Chairman of the BOK Financial Board, and Mr. Steve Bradshaw, BOK Financial President and Chief Executive Officer, emphasize a long-term approach to management, reducing pressure on executives to realize short-term gains to the detriment of overall long-term success.
    
Recoupment of Incentive Compensation

Under the Plan, in the event incorrect financial information or results were used as a basis for calculation of incentive compensation under the Plan, the Board of Directors may direct remedial action including the forfeiture of unpaid incentive compensation and/or the restitution of paid incentive compensation. The Board of Directors may require forfeiture or restitution from any executive who is accountable for the incorrect financial information or results, as well as any executive who erroneously benefits from the incorrect financial information or results.
Evaluating Executive Compensation Relative to Peer and Overall Earnings Performance

By basing the Executive Incentive Plan on peer bank comparison, the Company avoids penalizing executives for general industry and economic downturns and encourages executives to produce the best possible results in good and bad economic times. All of the named executives receive annual incentive based on the per share earnings growth (“EPS Growth”) of the Company compared to peer banks’ EPS Growth. Mr. Ellinor, Mr. Bradshaw and Mr. Bagwell receive 50% of their annual incentive based on EPS Growth. The CEO and CFO receive 100% of their annual incentive based on EPS Growth. Long-term compensation is based on comparison to the peer bank median and is paid in stock options and restricted stock, which by their nature or terms are performance based. The Committee’s goal has always been to provide competitive remuneration to executives to enable BOK Financial to hire and retain top talent. The Committee has reviewed previous years’ earnings per share performance relative to the peer banks and compensation paid to named executives relative to compensation paid for similar positions at the peer banks.
Factors Used for Establishing Executive Compensation

The following is an explanation of the primary data, metrics and criteria used by the Committee to determine compensation as more fully described in “Components of Compensation” below:
Earnings Per Share Growth Compared to Peers

EPS Growth is used to measure the annual incentive under the Executive Incentive Plan.

28



The Committee views EPS Growth as an important variable used in public markets to measure profitability and determine the Company’s stock price and, thus, shareholder value.
Net Direct Contribution

Net Direct Contribution is a mathematical calculation designed to compare the actual financial contribution of a business unit to its planned performance. Net Direct Contribution is determined, generally, by calculating the net operating income of a business unit and subtracting net loan charge offs and all gains and/or losses on repossessed assets related to the business unit. The net results of the valuation of mortgage servicing rights (“MSR”) and the related MSR hedge activity are also included in Mr. Bradshaw’s 2013 results as he was responsible for Mortgage Banking.

Prior to the beginning of the new fiscal year, the CEO asked Mr. Ellinor, Mr. Bradshaw and Mr. Bagwell to develop business plans which include anticipated expenses and targeted revenue for their respective areas of responsibility (the “Net Direct Contribution Plans”). The CEO and CFO, in concert with the responsible executive, reviewed and modified the Net Direct Contribution Plans. The CEO and CFO then aggregated the Net Direct Contribution Plans to develop an overall Company-wide budget and plan (the “Annual Plan”).

For Mr. Ellinor, 2013 Net Direct Contribution was linked to financial performance of Commercial Banking in Oklahoma, New Mexico, Arizona and Arkansas, Commercial Real Estate, Energy Lending, and TransFund. For Mr. Bradshaw, 2013 Net Direct Contribution was linked to the financial performance of the Consumer Banking, Mortgage Banking, Treasury Services, Wealth Management and Commercial Banking activities in Kansas City and Colorado. For Mr. Bagwell, 2013 Net Direct Contribution was linked to financial performance in the Texas market.

Prior to the beginning of the new fiscal year, the CEO asked Mr. Cotter, as Chief Credit Officer, to develop a plan for Company credit quality which is to be measured against peer bank credit quality (the “Credit Quality Plan”). The measures in the Credit Quality Plan include charge-offs, nonperforming, criticized and classified assets. The CEO and the CFO, in concert with Mr. Cotter, reviewed and modified the Credit Plan. The Credit Quality Plan, like the Net Direct Contributions Plans, is included in the Annual Plan.

The Annual Plan is presented to the Company Board of Directors for review and comment.

Linking compensation to Net Direct Contribution motivates executives to achieve superior results in their particular business units, contributing to Company-wide profitability.
Individual Performance Goals

At the beginning of each year, the CEO meets with each of the named executives to establish individual performance goals.

Progress is discussed with each executive periodically throughout the year.



29


Compensation may be adjusted downward in the event executives fail to meet individual performance goals.
Peer Group Compensation Data

The Company’s internal compensation group completes an annual peer review of executive compensation using publicly available information, including proxy statements.

The Committee uses this information to assist in setting salary and, in future years, to establish annual and long-term compensation targets in accordance with the Plan and also to determine payments under the True-Up Plan.

The Committee annually updates the peer group of bank holding companies in accordance with the following guidelines:

The peer banks will include only publicly-traded, SEC registered, United States bank holding companies (BHCs).

The peer banks include an equal number of BHCs above and below the Company, with the Company being the median bank; provided, however, that BHCs with assets greater than 300% of the Company’s assets or less than 50% of the Company’s assets (as of the date for which the calculation is being made) shall be excluded from the peer banks.

Notwithstanding the foregoing or anything to the contrary in the Plan, in the event the peer banks contain any financial institution that does not have sufficient compensation or earnings data to complete the contemplated calculation under the Plan, such financial institution shall be eliminated from the group of peer banks and replaced with the financial institution that has the next smallest amount of assets of those financial institutions eligible for the peer banks that are not already included in the peer group, even if such financial institution has total assets less than 50% of the Company. Asset size means total assets at the end of the calendar year for which the compensation is being paid.

For 2013, the peer banks include:

Financial Institution
Total Assets ($000) 1
Comerica Inc
$65,227,000
Huntington Bancshares, Inc.
$59,476,344
Zion's Bancorporation
$56,031,127
First Niagara
$37,628,362
City National Corp
$29,717,951
SVB Financial
$26,417,189
Synovus Financial Corp
$26,201,604
East West Bancorp
$24,730,068
Cullen/Frost Bkrs
$24,313,000
Associated Banc
$24,226,920
BOK Financial Corporation
$27,015,432

1 For period ending December 31, 2013.

30


Components of Executive Compensation

Salary – Executives receive a base salary which is paid in cash twice monthly. Each year the Committee reviews executive base salaries to determine if adjustments should be made in view of a change in the executives’ roles and responsibilities, value added to the Company, individual performance, experience, evaluation of peer data and overall success of the Company.

Specifically, the Committee considers the reports and recommendations of the CEO as to the individual performance of each executive in determining salary. The CEO reports on the attainment of individual goals. These annual goals are specific to each executive and align with the current objectives of the Company. The goals may include achievement of Net Direct Contribution targets and completion of initiatives to enhance operational efficiency, reduce expenses, improve risk management and compliance, implement new products or technologies, and strengthen human capital. The Committee also considers salaries in light of overall corporate performance by considering the Company’s success financially through reports of earnings and operationally through reports of compliance and management from regulators and the audit committee.

The Committee also considers peer data compiled by the Company’s internal compensation group and validated by an independent compensation consultant. The Committee has historically sought to align executive salaries with the peer bank median for related executives roles and experience. The Committee generally considers base salary that is within plus or minus 10% of peer median to be an acceptable range of deviation. For 2013, the BOK Financial base salary for the named executives compared to the median of its Peer Group was as follows:

Executive
BOKF Base Pay Compared to Peer Group Median for Comparable Executive Position
Stanley A. Lybarger
97.0%
Steven E. Nell
92.0%
Steven G. Bradshaw
99.6%
Daniel H. Ellinor
99.6%
Norman P. Bagwell
96.0%
Charles E. Cotter
91.1%

Executive Incentive Compensation – The Executive Incentive Plan allows the named executives, and certain executives that report directly to, or are designated by, the CEO, to earn (1) an annual cash incentive, which has historically been paid in the first quarter of the year following that to which the service relates, and (2) long-term incentive, which is paid in stock options or performance shares, or a combination thereof (at the option of the executive). No annual cash incentive for any one participant may exceed $2,000,000. No more than 60,000 shares of restricted stock and 200,000 stock options may be issued to a single participant in any one year. Stock options and performance shares are awarded on the second business Friday of January.

(1)
Comparable Executive Position. For purposes of both annual and long-term incentive, each named executive’s position is compared to the peer banks’ executive positions, based upon information reported in shareholder proxy statements, as follows (each a “Comparable Executive Position”): the Company’s Chief Executive Officer is compared against the chief executive officers of the peer banks; the Chief Financial Officer is compared against the chief financial

31


officers of the peer banks; Dan Ellinor and Steve Bradshaw are compared to the average of the two highest paid positions (excluding the chief executive officer and the chief financial officer) of the peer banks; Norm Bagwell is compared to the average of the 2nd and 3rd highest paid positions of the peer banks (excluding the chief executive officer and the chief financial officer); and Chuck Cotter is compared to the third highest paid position of the peer banks (excluding the chief executive officer and the chief financial officer).

(2)
Annual Incentive Bonus. The “Annual Incentive Bonus” is determined as follows:

(i)
The two year average EPS Growth (“Average Growth”) is calculated for each peer bank based upon such peer bank’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and for the Company. The Company and the peer banks are then ranked starting with the highest Average Growth and ending with the lowest Average Growth (the “EPS Percentile Ranking”). The EPS Percentile Ranking for 2013 was the 10th percentile which resulted in an incentive payment for all named executives based on the EPS Growth measure. Those executives who also receive a portion of their Annual Incentive Bonus based upon Net Direct Contribution did receive some Annual Incentive Bonus as further described in paragraphs 2(vi) and (vii) below and in column (g) of the Summary Compensation Table on page 41.

(ii)
The two year average annual bonus amount for each Comparable Executive Position at each peer bank is then calculated based upon such peer bank’s past two proxy statements (the “Peer Bank Annual Bonus Amount”). The Peer Bank Annual Bonus Amount for each Comparable Executive Position is then ranked starting with the highest Peer Bank Annual Bonus Amount and ending with the lowest Peer Bank Annual Bonus Amount (the “Peer Bank Annual Bonus Percentile Ranking”).

(iii)
The Company’s EPS Percentile Ranking is then applied to the Peer Bank Annual Bonus Percentile Ranking for each Comparable Executive Position to determine a Plan participant’s “Peer Bank Annual Bonus Match”. For example, if the Company’s EPS Percentile Ranking is at the 10th percentile, then the Peer Bank Annual Bonus Match for the Company’s Chief Executive Officer would be at the 10th percentile of the Chief Executive Officer Annual Bonus Amount in the Peer Bank Annual Bonus Percentile Ranking. The Peer Bank Annual Bonus Match amount for each named executive in 2013 was the 10th percentile.

(iv)
The Annual Incentive Bonus for the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and its Chief Financial Officer equals that of their respective Peer Bank Annual Bonus Match.

(v)
The Annual Incentive Bonus for named executives (other than the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer) equals (i) 50% of the amount of their Peer Group Annual Bonus Match and (ii) the Business Unit Annual Incentive Bonus (as hereafter defined).

(vi)
The Business Unit Annual Incentive Bonus is based upon the applicable business unit Net Direct Contribution matrix pursuant to which 33% of the

32


target will be earned if 80% of the goal is met, 100% of the target will be earned if 100% of the goal is met and 200% of the target will be earned if 120% of the goal is met (the “Business Unit Annual Incentive Bonus”). The target opportunity for the Business Unit Annual Incentive Bonus will be calculated as a percentage of base salary, determined individually for each executive. Such target opportunity and the business unit goals, are established by the Chief Executive Officer and approved by the Committee.

The determination of the percentage of base salary used as the Business Unit Annual Incentive Bonus target opportunity is subjective. The Chief Executive Officer recommends the percentage and it is approved by the Committee. The Chief Executive Officer has historically recommended that the percentages of base salary used as Business Unit Annual Incentive Bonus target opportunities be the median of peer annual incentive bonus targets provided in peer proxy data.

The Annual Incentive Bonus target opportunity for Mr. Bradshaw and Mr. Ellinor is the median of peer annual incentive compensation for the executive III and IV positions as disclosed in peer proxy data, which is 60% of base salary. The Business Unit Annual Incentive Bonus accounts for half of Mr. Bradshaw and Mr. Ellinor’s Annual Incentive Bonus target, which would be 30% of base salary. The other half of the Annual Incentive Bonus target is set at the Peer Group Annual Bonus median. Actual payout is based on EPS Percentile Ranking as described above.

The Annual Incentive Bonus Target opportunity for Mr. Bagwell is the median of peer annual incentive compensation for executive IV and V positions as disclosed in the peer proxy data, which is 50% of base salary.  The Business Unit Annual Incentive Bonus accounts for half of Mr. Bagwell’s Annual Incentive Bonus target, which would be 25% of base salary.  The other half of the Annual Incentive Bonus target is set at the Peer Group Annual Bonus median.  Actual payout is based on EPS Percentile Ranking as described above.



33


(vii)
The Business Unit Annual Incentive Bonus for the three named executives (other than the CEO and CFO, whose annual incentive is based solely on EPS Growth as described herein), is 100% of the planned Net Direct Contribution (described on page 29) for such named executive’s respective area of responsibility for Mr. Ellinor, Mr. Bradshaw and Mr. Bagwell and 100% Credit Quality versus performance for Mr. Cotter. For 2013, the Net Direct Contribution targets were as follows (in thousands): Mr. Ellinor - $246,988, Mr. Bradshaw - $264,311 and Mr. Bagwell - $127,082. For Mr. Cotter, the Credit Quality target was the 50th percentile of the peer banks for charge-offs and the 40th percentile of peer banks for nonperforming and criticized and classified assets. For 2013, the named executives attained their Net Direct Contribution targets as follows: Mr. Ellinor attained 96.8%, Mr. Bradshaw attained 82.2%, Mr. Bagwell attained 99.7% and Mr. Cotter attained 152.9%. For the two year average (2012 and 2013), the named executives attained their Net Direct Contribution targets as follows: Mr. Ellinor attained 104.3%, Mr. Bradshaw attained 100.8%, Mr. Bagwell attained 102.5% and Mr. Cotter attained 146.8%. The two year average of Net Direct Contribution performance equates to an annual incentive payment of approximately 121.3% of target for Mr. Ellinor, 103.9% of target for Mr. Bradshaw, 112.6% of target for Mr. Bagwell and 200% for Mr. Cotter

(3)
Long Term Incentive Compensation. “Long Term Incentive Compensation” is determined as follows:

(i)
The two year average long term incentive compensation amount for each Comparable Executive Position at each peer bank is calculated based upon such peer banks’ past two proxy statements (the “Peer Bank Long Term Incentive Compensation Amount”).

(ii)
The Long Term Incentive Compensation awarded to each named executive equals the median of all the Peer Bank Long Term Incentive Compensation Amounts corresponding to such Plan participant’s Comparable Executive Position. The amounts paid to the Executives as stock awards and options awards in columns (e) and (f) of the Summary Compensation Table on page 41 reflect the median amounts of the Peer Bank Long Term Incentive Compensation.

(iii)
Each named executive will, immediately prior to the date of grant each year, specify the percentage of the Long Term Incentive Compensation that the Plan participant desires to receive by the issuance of options and the percentage the participant desires to receive by the issuance of restricted stock. The elections available to each participant will be (i) 100% options; (ii) 100% restricted stock, or (iii) 50% options and 50% restricted stock. The number of options or shares will be based on the value of each option or performance share and the total Long Term Incentive Compensation intended to be granted.

(iv)
To the extent a named executive elects to receive all or any portion of his Long Term Incentive Compensation through an issuance of restricted stock, the measure against which such Plan participant’s performance will be based

34


is as follows. To the extent the Company’s earnings per share for the year following the grant of restricted stock does not equal or exceed $1.00 per share (adjusted for stock dividends or distributions, recapitalization, merger, consolidation, exchange of shares, stock splits or the like), the named executive shall forfeit all the restricted stock granted to him the previous year on or before March 15 of the year following that in which the grant occurred. Dividends paid on restricted stock will not be forfeited, even if the restricted stock itself is forfeited. To the extent the Company’s earnings per share for the year following the grant of restricted stock equal or exceed $1.00 per share (adjusted for stock dividends or distributions, recapitalization, merger, consolidation, exchange of shares, stock splits or the like), the Plan participant shall retain all the restricted stock granted to him the previous year.

True-Up Plan - The purpose of the True-Up Plan, which was approved by shareholders in 2011, is to address inequity in annual and long-term incentive which may result from the anticipated earnings per share percentile “bounce-back” by peer banks that performed poorly during the recent economic anomaly. The True-Up Plan is designed to allow for the restoration of the Company’s named executives’ annual and long-term compensation to levels comparable to that of named executives at the peer banks with comparative earnings per share performance from years 2006 through 2013 (the “True-Up Period”). Conversely, the True-Up Plan also provides for the repayment by the Company’s named executives those amounts paid to them during the True-Up Period which exceed compensation paid to named executives at the peer banks who had comparative earnings. True-Up payments for each named executive will be calculated in April, 2014.

Calculation of the True-Up amount is summarized below.

1)
True-Up Period compensation for the Peer Group executives is determined and ranked. The “Peer Bank Compensation Ranking” is determined by taking the total base salary, annual bonus and stock–based incentive of each executive at the peer banks during the entire True-Up Period and ranking the peer banks’ comparable executives from highest compensation to lowest compensation (e.g. taking all the CEOs of the peer banks and ranking them from highest compensated CEO to lowest compensated CEO).

2)
True-Up Period compensation for the Company’s executives is calculated. “Company Compensation” for the CEO and CFO equals total base salary, annual bonus and stock-based incentive awarded during the True-Up Period. “Company Compensation” for other named executives equals total base salary, annual bonus and stock-based incentive awarded to such named executive during the True-Up period minus amounts earned above the target opportunity for his Business Unit Annual Incentive Bonus or plus amounts earned below the Business Unit Annual Incentive Bonus. For more information regarding Business Unit Annual Incentive Bonus see page 32.

3)
Company earnings per share performance is compared to the peer banks. The “True-Up Performance Measure” consists of two calculations. The first, meant to capture pre and post-recession performance, considers the EPS Growth beginning with the average earnings per share for 2006 and 2007 for the Company and each peer bank and ending with the average earnings per share for 2012 and 2013 for the Company and each peer bank existing as of December 31, 2013 (the “Pre and Post Recession Performance”). The second, meant to capture recessionary period performance, calculates growth in cumulative earnings per share for the Company and each peer bank as of December 31, 2011 for 2008 through 2011 over the average of 2006 and

35


2007 earnings per share for the Company and each peer bank respectively as of December 31, 2012. The Recessionary Period Performance for the Company was 407.8%.

The Pre and Post Recession Performance of the Company and each peer bank is ranked from highest to lowest and the Company’s percentile ranking is determined (the “Company Pre and Post Recession Performance Ranking”). The Recessionary Period Performance of the Company and each peer bank is ranked from highest to lowest and the Company’s percentile ranking determined (the “Company Recessionary Period Performance Ranking”). The Company’s Recessionary Performance Ranking was the 90th percentile.

The Company Pre and Post Recession Performance Ranking and the Company Recessionary Period Performance Ranking as determined above are averaged with the result being the “Company Performance Percentile Ranking”.

4)
The Company Performance Percentile Ranking is then applied to the Peer Bank Compensation ranking for each executive position to determine each of the Company’s named executives’ respective “Peer Bank Comparable Compensation. If the Peer Bank Comparable Compensation is more than that of the respective named executive, the Committee will award the differential to the named executive (the “Company True-Up Amount”). If the Peer Bank Comparable Compensation is less than the respective Company Executive Compensation, the named executive will compensate the Company for the difference (the “Executive True-Up Amount”).

5)
Payment under the True-Up Plan is awarded in cash and restricted shares. In the event a named executive is owed a Company True-Up Amount, the Committee shall award the named executive the Company True-Up Amount in cash (“Cash True-Up”) and restricted shares (“Share True-Up”) in proportion to the average cash to stock ratio awarded by the peer banks during the True-Up Period. The Plan period ends December 31, 2013. Awards under the Plan will not be finalized until 2013 Peer Proxy data is available. Final payment is to be made on or before May 31, 2014 (the “True-Up Payment Date”) pending Independent Compensation Committee approval. Any 2010 restricted shares will vest without restriction on December 31, 2014. The maximum Company True-Up Amount which may be paid to any one named executive is $20 million. In the event the Company is owed an Executive True-Up Amount, the Committee shall determine a reasonable time frame and methodology for the named executive to compensate the Company for the Executive True-Up Amount.

401(k) PlanExecutives may contribute to the BOKF 401(k) Plan. Employee contributions are matched by the Company up to 6% of the base compensation based on years of service. Participants may direct the investments of their accounts in a variety of options, including BOK Financial common stock.

Pension Plan - The Pension Plan was established in 1987 as a cash balance defined benefit pension plan. Benefits are determined based on a hypothetical account balance that accumulates over time. The account balances grow based on an interest credit defined in the Pension Plan on prior balances. In 2006, the company curtailed its contributions to the pension plan for all employees, including named executives; however, the hypothetical amounts continue to grow based on interest credit.

Deferred Compensation – Four of the five named executives are party to an individual Deferred Compensation Agreement that permitted, until year-end 2004, the deferral of certain compensation. The CEO is the only named executive officer that is party to an Amended and Restated 409A Deferred Compensation Agreement which currently allows awards of performance shares and options to be deferred. The executive

36


Deferred Compensation agreements are discussed in further detail under “Nonqualified Deferred Compensation” on page 52.

Perquisites and Other Personal Benefits – Other than the participation in the plans and programs described above, benefits disclosed in footnote six to the Summary Compensation Table on page 41, or benefits which are provided to employees generally such as health and dental insurance, the Company does not provide perquisites or other personal benefits to named executive officers.

Compensation Philosophy and Objectives

The BOK Financial executive compensation program has many objectives, all of which are designed to enhance Company value. Because no single type of compensation award or performance criteria could achieve all objectives, several types of compensation performance criteria and awards are used to achieve the maximum benefit from executive compensation.

There is no pre-established policy or target for allocating executive compensation between cash and equity, long-term and short-term. Rather, the Committee considers its varied objectives, personal performance, Company performance and data regarding peer bank compensation to establish the appropriate level and mix of incentive compensation. The Committee has generally chosen not to consider the benefits to named executives from previously awarded compensation other than to establish a baseline for future compensation.

Company executive compensation objectives include:

Sustained, Above Peer Performance – BOK Financial rewards sustained above peer performance through the Executive Incentive Plan consisting of a two year EPS Growth look back for annual compensation.

Individual Performance and Teamwork - Annual incentive compensation promotes individual performance with a percentage of annual incentive compensation being based on Net Direct Contribution (except for the CEO and CFO) and a percentage being based on EPS Growth, with potential downward adjustments for failure to meet individual performance goals. Long-term compensation, which is awarded entirely as equity, promotes teamwork by aligning all executives’ interests with the success of the Company as a whole.

Link Compensation to Operational Results – By using EPS Growth and Net Direct Contribution as the metrics for performance, both annual and long-term compensation are directly tied to financial performance of the Company. The Committee also considers the financial success of the Company when determining salary.

Competition with Peer Banks –To attract and retain superior executives, BOK Financial strives to provide levels of compensation comparable to competitor banks. The Committee considers peer compensation data when establishing salary and incentive compensation targets.

Align Executive Interests with Shareholder Interests – While BOK Financial does not have a specific policy or target for determining the allocation between equity and cash awards, the Company does promote equity ownership to align executive interests with shareholder interests. All long-term executive compensation is paid in stock options or performance shares. Stock ownership guidelines require the CEO to own 75,000 shares of company stock. All other named executives must own 25,000 shares of company stock. Executives who fail to meet the stock ownership guidelines may not sell BOK Financial stock until such ownership amounts are attained.


37


Change in Control and Termination Benefits

The Company has a limited number of changes in control benefits for executive officers.  If an executive, or any employee of BOK Financial, is terminated within one year after a “change in control” (as defined in footnote 3 on page 55), and such termination is other than “for cause” (as defined in footnote 2 on page 55), then all unvested performance shares and stock options he or she has been granted vest.  Stock options must then be exercised within 90 days of the change in control. 

Executive officers receive the same severance benefits as other BOK Financial employees which are based upon the amount of time a person has been employed by the Company.  Mr. Nell, Mr. Bradshaw, Mr. Ellinor and Mr. Bagwell are entitled to receive additional severance pursuant to their employment agreements as more fully described in Potential Payments upon Termination found on pages 53 to 55.  The Company believes that the severance and termination payments help recruit and retain senior executives by protecting them in the event their positions are adversely impacted by an unexpected change in circumstance and are consistent with those offered by competitors.
Stock Option Grant Policy

In 2004, BOK Financial initiated a policy of granting all Company stock options, to both named executives and all other Company employees, on the first business Friday in January. This date was chosen by the Chief Executive Officer and the Chairman of the Board and is also the date that performance shares are awarded pursuant to the Executive Incentive Plan. In 2006, the pre-established grant date was changed to the second business Friday in January to account for administrative challenges during the holiday season (the “Grant Date”).

The exercise price for stock options awarded by BOK Financial is the fair market value for BOK Financial common stock on NASDAQ as of the Grant Date. There is no program or policy to coordinate the granting of options with the release of material non-public information as all grants occur on the Grant Date, including those made to new executive officers.
Tax and Accounting Considerations

Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code - Both annual incentive and long-term awards made pursuant to the Executive Incentive Plan are designed to comply with Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code. Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code generally limits to $1 million the amount that a publicly-held company is allowed to deduct each year for the compensation paid to each of the corporation’s chief executive officer and three most highly compensated executive officers other than the chief financial officer. However, performance-based compensation determined in accordance with IRS regulations is not subject to the limit. In order to qualify as performance-based compensation, payments must be computed on the basis of an objective, performance-based standard determined by a committee that consists solely of two or more voting outside directors and the material terms under which the compensation is to be paid, including the performance goals, must be disclosed to and approved by the shareholders.

Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code – If an executive is entitled to nonqualified deferred compensation benefits that are subject to Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code, and such benefits do not comply with Section 409A, then the benefits are taxable in the first year they are not subject to substantial risk of forfeiture. In such case, the Service Provider is subject to regular federal income tax, interest and an additional federal income tax of 20% of the benefit included in the income plus interest. The Company believes all deferred compensation benefits currently comply with 409A.

38


Committee Report

The Committee meets as often as necessary to perform its duties and responsibilities. The Committee held three meetings during fiscal year 2013. The Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K with management. Based upon such review, the related discussions and such other matters deemed relevant and appropriate by the Committee, the Committee has recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement and delivered to shareholders.

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
Greg S. Allen (Chairman)            
Chester E. Cadieux, III (non-voting)        
Joseph W. Craft, III                
David F. Griffin (non-voting)
George B. Kaiser (non-voting)
Steven J. Malcolm


39


EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
The following table provides information about the Company's equity compensation plans in effect at December 31, 2013. The 2009 Omnibus Incentive Plan and the BOK Financial Directors Stock Compensation Plan are included in the table. The material features of the compensation plans are described within Note 12 of the Company's Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, which was included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 26, 2014.
Plan Category
Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants, and rights
Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants, and rights
Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in the first column)(1)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders: stock options and restricted shares
1,135,105
$49.09
3,509,607
Non-vested common shares
647,989
Not applicable
Not applicable
Sub-total
1,783,094
 
3,509,607
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders
None
None
None

Total

1,783,094
 
3,509,607

(1)    Includes 428,719 shares of common stock which may be awarded pursuant to the BOK Financial Directors Stock Compensation Plan.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION TABLES
The following tables represent compensation of named executive officers over the periods represented in each table. The True-Up Plan, which was approved by shareholders in 2011, was created to address inequity in annual and long-term incentive which may result from the anticipated earnings per share percentile “bounce-back” by peer banks that performed poorly during the recent economic anomaly as described in more detail beginning on page 35 of the Compensation Discussion and Analysis. The True-Up Plan is designed to allow for the restoration of the Company’s named executives’ annual and long-term compensation to levels comparable to that of named executives at the peer banks with comparative earnings per share performance from years 2006 through 2013. Conversely, the True-Up Plan also provides for the repayment by the Company’s named executives those amounts paid to them during the True-Up Period which exceed compensation paid to named executives at the peer banks who had comparative earnings. The final amount due under the 2011 True-Up Plan will be determined from information that will be published by peer banks during the first quarter of 2014, using December 31, 2013 as the determination date, and distributed on or before May 31, 2014. As of December 31, 2013, we estimated that approximately $69 million would be payable under the 2011 True-Up Plan. For additional information on the True-Up Plan, see pages 35 to 37.

40


SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

The following table sets forth summary information concerning the compensation for the past three fiscal years of those persons who were, at December 31, 2013, (i) the Chief Executive Officer (Mr. Lybarger until December 31, 2013), (ii) the Chief Financial Officer (Mr. Nell), (iii) the three other most highly compensated executive officers of the Company who were serving as executive officers at the end of 2013, and (iv) the Chief Credit Officer (Mr. Cotter) who retired in March 2013 so was not serving as an executive officer at the end of 2013, but is included because of the discretionary bonus he received at retirement.

(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
(h)
(i)
(j)
Name and
Principal Position
Year
Salary
($)
Bonus
($)
Stock
Awards
($)(1)(3)
Option Award
($)(2)(3)

Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation
($)(4)
Change in Pension Value
&
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings
($)(5)
All Other Compensation
($)(6)
Total
($)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Stanley A. Lybarger President & Chief Executive Officer, BOK Financial and BOKF
2013

$864,410


$0


$1,360,446


$0


$558,808


$3,652,099


$45,382


$6,481,145

2012

$849,314


$0


$1,469,939


$0


$978,169


$1,973,239


$41,613


$5,312,274

2011

$828,600


$0


$828,618


$1,105,604


$0


$103,012


$41,178


$2,907,012

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Steven E. Nell Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, BOK Financial and BOKF
2013

$439,354


$0


$248,991


$248,964


$259,838


$26,119


$30,600


$1,253,866

2012

$413,439


$0


$180,529


$99,519


$321,431


$16,585


$30,000


$1,061,503

2011

$405,001


$0


$0


$572,907


$0


$4,712


$29,400


$1,012,019

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Steven G. Bradshaw Senior Executive Vice President, BOKF
2013

$484,275


$0


$229,091


$229,063


$248,085


$24,943


$47,068


$1,262,525

2012

$466,377


$0


$437,413


$131,895


$382,462


$12,091


$41,862


$1,472,100

2011

$455,001


$0


$306,216


$289,361


$273,000


--$8,352


$39,946


$1,355,172

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Daniel H. Ellinor Senior Executive Vice President, BOKF
2013

$484,275


$0


$458,127


$0


$273,430


$964


$24,694


$1,241,490

2012

$466,377


$0


$592,658


--$16,927


$415,888


$1,712


$25,920


$1,485,628

2011

$455,001


$0


$308,688


$291,432


$259,772


--$5,165


$24,748


$1,334,475

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Norman P. Bagwell
Chief Executive Officer, Bank of Texas (7)
2013

$403,054


$0


$429,254


$0


$209,681


$0


$211,458


$1,253,447

2012

$389,546


$0


$397,056


--$10,897


$281,064


$0


$25,473


$1,082,242

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Charles E. Cotter Executive Vice President, Chief Credit Officer, BOKF (8)
2013

$106,585


$0


$92,528


$0


$269,610


$8,126


$1,250,755


$1,727,604

2012

$368,010


$0


$204,779


--$25,299


$292,881


$11,051


$30,000


$881,422

2011

$357,875


$0


$0


$391,787


$194,554


$10,487


$39,924

$994,627


(1)
The amounts in column (e) are the grant date fair value of the non-vested stock awards. As described in more detail in footnote (3), amounts reported for 2012 and for 2011 have been adjusted for the actual performance of the 2009 and 2008 performance grant, respectively.


41


(2)
The amounts in column (f) are the grant date fair value of the non-vested option awards. As described in more detail in footnote (3), amounts reported for 2012 and for 2011 have been adjusted for the actual performance of the 2009 and 2008 performance grant, respectively.  

(3)
The chart below shows the dollar amounts of the grant date fair value of stock and option awards in 2012 for the 2012 grants and the adjustments for 2009 made in 2012, at the end of the three year performance period. Options for 2009 were granted at the maximum (150% of target) and Stock Awards were granted at probable outcome. The 2009 performance grants were adjusted to 136% of target at the end of the performance period which resulted in a decrease for options and an increase for stock awards.
Name
Stock
Options
2009 Adjustment Value
Stock
Options
2012 Grant Value
Option
Award Total
(column (f) above)
Stock
Awards
2009 Adjustment Value
Stock
Awards
2012 Grant Value
Stock Award Total
(column (e) above)
Stanley A. Lybarger

$0


$0


$0


$596,589


$873,350


$1,469,939

Steven E. Nell

--$14,397


$113,916


$99,519


$66,593


$113,936


$180,529

Steven G. Bradshaw

--$16,541


$148,436


$131,895


$288,985


$148,428


$437,413

Daniel H. Ellinor

--$16,927


$0


--$16,927


$295,802


$296,856


$592,658

Norman P. Bagwell

--$10,897


$0


--$10,897


$190,397


$206,659


$397,056

Charles E. Cotter

--$4,720


$0


--$25,299


$0


$204,779


$204,779


The chart below shows the dollar amounts of the grant date fair value of stock and option awards in 2011 for the 2011 grants and the adjustments for 2008 made in 2011, at the end of the three year performance period. The 2008 performance grants were adjusted to 150% of target at the end of the performance period which resulted in an increase from the probable outcome for options and for stock awards.
Name
Stock
Options
2008 Adjustment Value
Stock
Options
2011 Grant Value
Option
Award Total
(column (f) above)
Stock
Awards
2008 Adjustment Value
Stock
Awards
2011 Grant Value
Stock Award Total
(column (e) above)
Stanley A. Lybarger

$0


$1,105,604


$1,105,604


$828,618


$0


$828,618

Steven E. Nell

$143,418


$429,489


$572,907


$0


$0


$0

Steven G. Bradshaw

$83,145


$206,216


$289,361


$100,021


$206,195


$306,216

Daniel H. Ellinor

$85,216


$206,216


$291,432


$102,493


$206,195


$308,688

Charles E. Cotter

$124,707


$267,080


$391,787


$0


$0


$0


(4)
The amounts in column (g) reflect the annual cash awards made pursuant to the Executive Incentive Plan, which is discussed in further detail on page 31 under the heading “Components of Executive Compensation.” Incentive amounts are paid at a targeted percentile of our peer group.

(5)
The amounts in column (h) for 2013 include (i) the actuarial increase in the present value of the named executive officer’s benefits under the Company pension plan using a discount rate defined in the Pension Plan and (ii) Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings further described in column (d) of the Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table on page 52. Because of the value of Mr. Lybarger’s pension benefit, which reflects 32 years of service, and the fact that a greater portion of Mr. Lybarger’s compensation has been deferred, column (h) for Mr. Lybarger differs significantly from the other named executives. Executives who did not have the ability to defer income or who chose not to defer income are not required to disclose investment income on the Summary Compensation Table.

(6)
The amounts in column (i) for 2013 are derived from Company matching contributions to the 401(k) Thrift Plan as follows: Lybarger $30,600; Nell, $30,600; Ellinor, $15,300; Bradshaw, $30,600; Bagwell, $15,300; and Cotter, $10,186. Amounts also include: trip earnings (personal portion of a trip such as an accompanying spouse or a free day) as follows: Lybarger $14,782; Ellinor $9,394; Bradshaw $16,468; and Bagwell $8,959. Amounts also include a discretionary bonus for Mr. Bagwell of $187,199, an employer HSA contribution for Mr. Cotter of $250, and, in connection with Mr. Cotter’s March 31, 2013 retirement, a discretionary bonus of $1,120,000 and a car costing $120,319.

(7)
Mr. Bagwell was not a named executive officer in 2011.

(8)
Mr. Cotter was not a named executive officer in 2012. Mr. Cotter retired on March 31, 2013 so was not serving as an executive officer at the end of fiscal 2013.

42


OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED

The following table includes certain information concerning the exercise of stock options and the vesting of performance shares by the named executive officers during fiscal year 2013:

 
Option Awards
Stock Awards
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)

Name

Number of Shares Acquired
on Exercise
(#)
Value Realized
on Exercise
($)
Number of Shares Acquired
on Vesting
(#)
Value Realized
on Vesting
($)
Stanley A. Lybarger
6,398(1)
$478,255(1)

41,448

$4,078,348

Steven E. Nell
9,944

$917,212

4,626

$455,287

Steven G. Bradshaw
2,926

$272,282

5,314

$522,933

Daniel H. Ellinor
13,001

$170,288

5,439

$535,269

Norman P. Bagwell
816

$67,968

3,774

$344,532

Charles E. Cotter
35,173

$644,838

0

$0


(1)
Includes 4,970 shares acquired on exercise and $309,728 realized on exercise in columns (b) and (c) respectively deferred at the option of Mr. Lybarger.
GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS

The following table sets forth certain information with respect to (i) non-equity annual incentive awards made pursuant to the Executive Incentive Plan and (ii) the options and performance shares awarded as long-term compensation pursuant to the Executive Incentive Plan.
 
 
Estimated Future Payouts Under
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards
Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards



 
 
 
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
(h)
(i)
(j)
(k)
(l)
EMPLOYEE NAME
Grant Date
(m/dd/yy)
Threshold ($)
Target ($)
Maximum ($)
Threshold (#)
Target (#)
Maximum (#)
All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units (#)
All Other Option Awards: Number of Securities Under-lying Options (#)




Exercise or Base Price of Option Award ($/sh)(8)

Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards
($)(9)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Stanley A. Lybarger(1)
 

$0

$558,808
$558,808
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1/11/2013 (7)
 
 
 
 
 
 
24,407
 

$55.74


$1,360,446

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Steven E. Nell(1)
 

$0


$259,838


$259,838

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1/11/2013 (6)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
25,746
 

$248,964

 
1/11/2013 (7)
 
 
 
 
 
 
4,467
 

$55.74


$248,991

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


43


Steven G. Bradshaw(1)
 

$0


$96,065


$96,065

 
 
 
 
 
 
 


(2)

$48,740


$146,220


$292,400

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1/11/2013 (6)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
23,688
 

$229,063

 
1/11/2013 (7)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 4,110
 

$55.74


$229,091

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Daniel H. Ellinor(1)
 

$0


$96,065


$96,065

 
 
 
 
 
 
 


(2)

$48,740


$146,220


$292,440

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1/11/2013 (7)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 8,219
 

$55.74


$458,127

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Norman P. Bagwell(1)
 

$0


$95,492


$95,492

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(2)

$33,778


$101,375


$202,750

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1/13/2012 (7)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 7,701
 
 $55.74


$429,254

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Charles E. Cotter(1)
 

$0


$66,813


$66,813

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(3) 

$21,543


$64,665


$129,330

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(4) 

$12,305


$36,951


$73,903

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(5) 

$6,171


$18,476


$36,591

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1/11/2013
 (7)(10)
 
 
 
 
 
 
1,660
 

$55.74


$92,528


(1)
Mr. Lybarger and Mr. Nell receive 100%, Mr. Ellinor, Mr. Bradshaw and Mr. Bagwell receive 50% and Mr. Cotter receives 35% of their annual incentive based on EPS Growth. Annual incentive cash awards were finalized and approved by the Independent Compensation Committee on February 25, 2014 and are provided in column (g), “Summary Compensation Table” on page 41 herein. The total annual incentive cannot exceed $2,000,000 per the Executive Incentive plan for any participant.

(2)
Represents annual incentive targets for Business Unit Annual Incentive Bonus for Mr. Bradshaw, Mr. Ellinor and Mr. Bagwell established by the Independent Compensation Committee on February 26, 2013 for service performed in 2013. Mr. Ellinor, Mr. Bradshaw and Mr. Bagwell received 50% of their annual incentive based on Business Unit Performance. The cash awards were finalized and approved by the Independent Compensation Committee on February 25, 2014 and are provided in column (g), “Summary Compensation Table” on page 41 herein. The total annual incentive cannot exceed $2,000,000 per the Executive Incentive plan for any participant.

(3)
Represents annual incentive targets for Charge-off Performance relative to Pay Peers for Mr. Cotter established by the Independent Compensation Committee on February 26, 2013 for service performed in 2013. Mr. Cotter received 35% of his annual incentive based on Charge-off Performance. The cash award was finalized and approved by the Independent Compensation Committee on February 25, 2014 and is provided in column (g), “Summary Compensation Table” on page 41 herein. The total annual incentive cannot exceed $2,000,000 per the Executive Incentive Plan for any participant.

(4)
Represents annual incentive targets for Non-Performing Assets Performance relative to Pay Peers for Mr. Cotter established by the Independent Compensation Committee on February 26, 2013 for service performed in 2013. Mr. Cotter received 20% of his annual incentive based on Charge-off Performance. The cash award was finalized and approved by the Independent Compensation Committee on February 25, 2014 and is provided in column (g), “Summary Compensation Table” on page 41 herein. The total annual incentive cannot exceed $2,000,000 per the Executive Incentive Plan for any participant.

(5)
Represents annual incentive targets for Criticized Assets Performance relative to Pay Peers for Mr. Cotter established by the Independent Compensation Committee on February 26, 2013 for service performed in 2013. Mr. Cotter received 10% of his annual incentive based on Charge-off Performance. The cash award was finalized and approved by the Independent Compensation Committee on February 25, 2014 and is provided in column (g), “Summary

44


Compensation Table” on page 41 herein. The total annual incentive cannot exceed $2,000,000 per the Executive Incentive Plan for any participant.

(6)
Represents stock options granted as long-term incentive pursuant to the Executive Incentive Plan. The awards relate to services performed in 2012. The stock options vest 1/7 each year in accordance with the BOK Financial 2009 Omnibus Incentive Plan and terminate three years after vesting.

(7)
Represents performance shares granted as long-term incentive pursuant to the Executive Incentive plan. The awards relate to services performed in 2012. Performance shares vest on the third anniversary of the last day of the year for which the performance shares were issued. The performance shares may not be sold for two years unless certain stock ownership guidelines are met as further described in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” on page 26 herein.

(8)
The exercise price for all stock option awards as reported in column (k) is the fair market value of BOK Financial common stock on the date the award is granted. For further discussion of the Company’s Stock Option Grant Policy see page 38 herein.

(9)
Amounts reported in column (l) represent the grant-date fair value of non-vested stock and stock options awarded. The Company’s policy regarding the valuation of stock compensation is included in footnote 1 and assumptions used in the calculation of the grant-date fair value of stock compensation are included in footnote 12 of the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2013 which was included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 26, 2014.

(10) Mr. Cotter was awarded these performance shares but forfeited them upon retirement.




45


OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END

The following table includes stock options and performance shares outstanding as of December 31, 2013.