|
|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| |||||||||
Bank of the Ozarks 10-Q 2005 Table of ContentsSECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark one)
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005
For the transition period from to .
Commission File Number 0-22759
BANK OF THE OZARKS, INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (501) 978-2265
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes x No ¨
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrants classes of common stock, as of the latest practical date.
Table of ContentsFORM 10-Q March 31, 2005 INDEX
Table of ContentsCONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) Unaudited
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
1
Table of ContentsCONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) Unaudited
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
2
Table of ContentsCONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY (Dollars in thousands) Unaudited
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
3
Table of ContentsCONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Dollars in thousands) Unaudited
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
4
Table of ContentsNOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) 1. Principles of Consolidation
Bank of the Ozarks, Inc. (the Company) is a bank holding company headquartered in Little Rock, Arkansas, which operates under the rules and regulations of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. The Company owns a wholly-owned state chartered bank subsidiary - Bank of the Ozarks (the Bank), and three business trusts - Ozark Capital Statutory Trust II (Ozark II), Ozark Capital Statutory Trust III (Ozark III) and Ozark Capital Statutory Trust IV (Ozark IV) (collectively, the Trusts). The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and the Bank. Significant intercompany transactions and amounts have been eliminated in consolidation.
2. Basis of Presentation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared by the Company, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in Article 10 of Regulation S-X and with the instructions to Form 10-Q, and in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (GAAP) for interim financial information. Certain information, accounting policies and footnote disclosures normally included in complete financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted in accordance with such rules and regulations. These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. In the opinion of management all adjustments considered necessary, consisting of normal recurring items, have been included for a fair presentation of the accompanying consolidated financial statements. Operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2005 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year or future periods.
Certain reclassifications of prior period amounts have been made to conform with the current period presentation. These reclassifications had no impact on previously reported net income.
3. Earnings Per Share (EPS)
Basic EPS is computed by dividing reported earnings available to common shareholders by weighted-average shares outstanding. Diluted EPS is computed by dividing reported earnings available to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of shares outstanding after consideration of the dilutive effect of the Companys outstanding stock options. In computing dilution for stock options, a simple average share price of the Companys stock based on the daily ending trade as reported on Bloomberg is used for the reporting period. For the three month periods ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, all of the Companys outstanding stock options were included in the diluted EPS calculations.
Basic and diluted EPS are computed as follows:
(The remainder of this page intentionally left blank)
5
Table of Contents4. Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) Advances
FHLB advances with original maturities exceeding one year totaled $60.9 million at March 31, 2005. Interest rates on these advances ranged from 1.63% to 6.43% at March 31, 2005, with a weighted-average rate of 6.25%. FHLB advances of $60.0 million maturing in 2010 may be called quarterly. At March 31, 2005 aggregate annual maturities (dollars in thousands) and weighted-average interest rates of FHLB advances with an original maturity of over one year were as follows:
At March 31, 2005 the Company had FHLB advances of $129.0 million with a weighted-average rate of 2.75% and original maturities of one year or less which are not included in the above table.
5. Subordinated Debentures
On June 18, 1999, Ozark Capital Trust (Ozark) sold to investors in a public underwritten offering $17.3 million of 9% cumulative trust preferred securities (9% Securities). The proceeds were used to purchase an equal principal amount of 9% subordinated debentures (9% Debentures) of the Company. The 9% Securities and the 9% Debentures were prepaid in full on June 18, 2004. In connection with this prepayment, the Company recorded a charge of $852,000 to write-off the remaining unamortized debt issuance costs incurred in connection with the 9% Securities and the 9% Debentures.
On September 25, 2003, Ozark III sold to investors in a private placement offering $14 million of adjustable rate trust preferred securities, and on September 29, 2003, Ozark II sold to investors in a private placement offering $14 million of adjustable rate trust preferred securities (collectively, 2003 Securities). The 2003 Securities bear interest at 90-day LIBOR plus 2.95% for Ozark III and 90-day LIBOR plus 2.90% for Ozark II, adjustable quarterly. The aggregate proceeds of $28 million from the 2003 Securities were used to purchase an equal principal amount of adjustable rate subordinated debentures of the Company that bear interest, adjustable quarterly, at 90-day LIBOR plus 2.95% for Ozark III and 90-day LIBOR plus 2.90% for Ozark II (2003 Debentures). The weighted-average interest rate on the 2003 Securities and the 2003 Debentures was 5.80% at March 31, 2005.
On September 28, 2004, Ozark IV sold to investors in a private placement offering $15 million of adjustable rate trust preferred securities (2004 Securities). The 2004 Securities bear interest, adjustable quarterly, at 90-day LIBOR plus 2.22%. The aggregate proceeds of $15 million from the 2004 Securities were used to purchase an equal principal amount of adjustable rate subordinated debentures of the Company that bear interest, adjustable quarterly, at 90-day LIBOR plus 2.22% (2004 Debentures). The interest rate on the 2004 Securities and the 2004 Debentures was 5.07% at March 31, 2005.
In addition to the issuance of these adjustable rate securities, Ozark II and Ozark III collectively sold $0.9 million of trust common equity to the Company, and Ozark IV sold $0.4 million of trust common equity to the Company. The proceeds from the sales of the trust common equity were used to purchase $0.9 million of 2003 Debentures and $0.4 million of 2004 Debentures issued by the Company.
At March 31, 2005, the Company had an aggregate of $44.3 million of subordinated debentures outstanding and had an asset of $1.3 million representing its investment in the common equity issued by the Trusts. The Company has, through various contractual arrangements, fully and unconditionally guaranteed all obligations of the Trusts with respect to the 2003 Securities and the 2004 Securities. The sole assets of the Trusts are the adjustable rate debentures. The 2003 Securities and the 2003 Debentures mature in September 2033, and the 2004 Securities and the 2004 Debentures mature September 2034 (the thirtieth anniversary date of each issuance). However, these securities and debentures may be prepaid, subject to regulatory approval, prior to maturity at any time on or after the fifth anniversary date of issuance (September 25 and 29, 2008 for the two issues of 2003 Securities and 2003 Debentures and September 28, 2009 for the 2004 Securities and 2004 Debentures), or at an earlier date upon certain changes in tax laws, investment company laws or regulatory capital requirements.
6
Table of Contents6. Supplementary Data for Cash Flows
Cash payments for interest by the Company during the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 amounted to $8.2 million and $5.4 million, respectively. Cash payments for income taxes during the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 were $0.3 million and $1.0 million, respectively.
7. Guarantees and Commitments
Outstanding standby letters of credit are contingent commitments issued by the Company generally to guarantee the performance of a customer in third party borrowing arrangements. The maximum amount of future payments the Company could be required to make under these guarantees at March 31, 2005 is $6.1 million. The Company holds collateral to support guarantees when deemed necessary. The total of collateralized commitments at March 31, 2005 was $3.7 million.
At March 31, 2005, the Company had outstanding commitments to extend credit of $187.3 million. These commitments extend over varying periods of time with the majority to be disbursed or to expire within a one-year period.
8. Stock-Based Compensation
The Company adopted the fair value method of recording stock-based compensation in 2003 and uses the prospective transition method for all stock options granted after December 31, 2002. The Company continues to apply Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25 and related interpretations in accounting for stock options granted prior to January 1, 2003. Accordingly, no stock-based compensation cost is reflected in net income for stock options granted in periods prior to that date. The following table illustrates the effects on net income and EPS had the Company applied the fair value recognition provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123, as amended by SFAS No. 148, to its stock-based compensation plans for the three month periods ended March 31, 2005 and 2004:
The fair value of stock options is amortized over their respective vesting periods. No compensation expense is recognized for options that are forfeited before vesting. The pro forma disclosures may not be representative of the effects on net income and EPS in future periods.
In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. 123 (Revised 2004), Share-Based Payment (SFAS No. 123R). SFAS No. 123R eliminated the alternative to use APB Opinion No. 25s intrinsic value method of accounting that was provided in SFAS No. 123. SFAS No. 123R requires entities to measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value of the award. Such cost is to be recognized over the vesting period of the award. The provisions of SFAS No. 123R are effective for the first quarter of the first fiscal year that begins after June 15, 2005. Since the Company adopted the prospective transition method of fair value stock-based compensation accounting as provided for under the provision of SFAS No. 148, management expects the adoption of SFAS No. 123R will not have a material impact on the Companys financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
7
Table of Contents9. Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Unrealized gains and losses on investment securities available for sale are the only items included in accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income. Total comprehensive income (which consists of net income and unrealized gains and losses on investment securities available for sale, net of income taxes) was $4.3 million and $7.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
(The remainder of this page intentionally left blank)
8
Table of ContentsItem 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
General
Net income was $7.3 million for the first quarter of 2005, a 22.7% increase from net income of $6.0 million for the comparable quarter in 2004. Diluted earnings per share increased 22.2% to $0.44 for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 compared to $0.36 for the comparable quarter in 2004.
The Companys annualized return on average assets was 1.68% for the first quarter of 2005 compared to 1.70% for the first quarter of 2004. Its annualized return on average stockholders equity was 23.69% for the first quarter of 2005 compared with 23.45% for the comparable quarter of 2004.
Total assets increased to $1.797 billion at March 31, 2005 from $1.727 billion at December 31, 2004. Loans and leases were $1.176 billion at March 31, 2005 compared to $1.135 billion at December 31, 2004. Deposits were $1.394 billion at March 31, 2005 compared to $1.380 billion at December 31, 2004.
Stockholders equity increased to $126.7 million at March 31, 2005 from $121.4 million at December 31, 2004, resulting in book value per share increasing to $7.62 from $7.36.
Annualized results for these interim periods may not be indicative of those for the full year or future periods.
Analysis of Results of Operations
The Companys results of operations depend primarily on net interest income, which is the difference between the interest income from earning assets, such as loans, leases and investments, and the interest expense incurred on interest- bearing liabilities, such as deposits and other borrowings. The Company also generates non-interest income, including service charges on deposit accounts, mortgage lending income, trust income, bank owned life insurance income, other charges and fees and gains (losses) on sales of assets. The Companys non-interest expense consists primarily of employee compensation and benefits, occupancy and equipment and other operating expenses. The Companys results of operations are also impacted by its provision for loan and lease losses and its provision for income taxes. The following discussion provides a comparative summary of the Companys operations for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004.
(The remainder of this page intentionally left blank)
9
Table of ContentsNet Interest Income
Net interest income is analyzed in the discussion and tables below on a fully taxable equivalent (FTE) basis. The adjustment to convert certain income to an FTE basis consists of dividing tax-exempt income by one minus the Companys statutory federal income tax rate of 35%.
Net interest income (FTE) increased 18.7% to $17.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2005, compared to $14.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2004. The primary contributor to the increase in net interest income (FTE) for the first quarter of 2005 compared to the same period in 2004 was the Companys growth in average earning assets. Average earning assets increased 23.9% in the first quarter of 2005 compared to the first quarter of 2004. Net interest margin (FTE) was 4.33% for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, compared to 4.48% for the same quarter in 2004, a decrease of 15 basis points (bps). This decline in net interest margin (FTE) was a result of yields on interest-earning assets increasing 29 bps, while the costs of interest-bearing liabilities increased 45 bps. As the Federal Open Market Committee has increased the Fed Funds target rate in recent quarters, the yield curve has flattened and competitive pressures have intensified. The Company believes these factors have contributed to the decline in net interest margin.
Analysis of Net Interest Income (FTE = Fully Taxable Equivalent)
(The remainder of this page intentionally left blank)
10
Table of ContentsAverage Consolidated Balance Sheets and Net Interest Analysis
(The remainder of this page intentionally left blank)
11
Table of ContentsNon-Interest Income
The Companys non-interest income consists primarily of (1) service charges on deposit accounts, (2) mortgage lending income, (3) trust income, (4) bank owned life insurance (BOLI) income, (5) appraisal, credit life commissions and other credit related fees, (6) safe deposit box rental, operating lease income, brokerage fees and other miscellaneous fees and (7) net gains (losses) on sales of assets.
Non-interest income for the first quarter of 2005 increased 9.5% to $4.4 million compared with $4.0 million for the first quarter of 2004. The Companys service charges on deposit accounts for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 were up 4.6%, as compared to the same quarter in 2004 as the Company continued to grow its number of core deposit customers. For the quarter ended March 31, 2005, trust income was up 29.2% over the same period in 2004 primarily due to continued growth in both the number of the Companys trust customers and the market value of assets under trust management. BOLI income was up 77.5% in the first quarter of 2005 compared to the first quarter of 2004 primarily as a result of the purchase of $18 million of additional BOLI on October 1, 2004.
Mortgage lending income declined 17.7% for the first quarter of 2005 compared to the same quarter in 2004. This decline was primarily the result of a 14.4% decrease in the volume of mortgage loan originations in the first quarter of 2005 compared to the same period in 2004. Mortgage loans for home purchases totaled 55% of total originations during the quarter ended March 31, 2005 compared to 57% for the quarter ended March 31, 2004. Mortgage refinancings totaled 45% of total originations during the first quarter of 2005 compared to 43% for the first quarter of 2004.
The table below shows non-interest income for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004.
Non-Interest Income
(The remainder of this page intentionally left blank)
12
Table of ContentsNon-Interest Expense
Non-interest expense for the first quarter of 2005 increased 13.3% to $9.5 million compared with $8.4 million for the comparable period in 2004. This increase in non-interest expense for the first quarter of 2005 as compared to the first quarter of 2004 is primarily the result of the Companys continued growth and expansion. At March 31, 2005, the Company had 54 full service banking offices compared to 42 at March 31, 2004, and the Companys full time equivalent employees were 578 at March 31, 2005 compared to 495 at March 31, 2004.
The Companys efficiency ratio (non-interest expense divided by the sum of non-interest income and net interest income - FTE) improved to 43.96% for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 compared to 45.31% for the quarter ended March 31, 2004.
The table below shows non-interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004.
Non-Interest Expense
Income Taxes
The provision for income taxes was $3.5 million for the first quarter of 2005 compared to $2.8 million for the same period in 2004. The effective income tax rate was 32.4% for the first quarter of 2005 compared to 32.1% for the first quarter of 2004. The Company has made certain investments resulting in federal and state income tax credits and other adjustments to the Companys state and federal income tax expense in 2005 and 2004. The Companys aggregate state and federal income tax expense was reduced by $17,000 and $143,000, respectively, during the quarters ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, as a result of these investments. These benefits were partially offset by impairment charges of $13,000 incurred during the first quarter 2005 and $83,000 incurred during the first quarter of 2004 to reduce the carrying value of these investments to estimated fair value.
(The remainder of this page intentionally left blank)
13
Table of ContentsAnalysis of Financial Condition
Loan and Lease Portfolio
At March 31, 2005 the Companys loan and lease portfolio was $1.176 billion, an increase from $1.135 billion at December 31, 2004. As of March 31, 2005, the Companys loan and lease portfolio consisted of approximately 81.2% real estate loans, 6.3% consumer loans, 8.6% commercial and industrial loans, 2.0% leases and 1.6% agricultural loans (non-real estate).
The amount and type of loans and leases outstanding at March 31, 2005 and 2004 and December 31, 2004 are reflected in the following table.
Loan and Lease Portfolio
Nonperforming Assets
Nonperforming assets consist of (1) nonaccrual loans and leases, (2) accruing loans and leases 90 days or more past due, (3) certain restructured loans and leases providing for a reduction or deferral of interest or principal because of a deterioration in the financial position of the borrower or lessee and (4) real estate or other assets that have been acquired in partial or full satisfaction of loan or lease obligations or upon foreclosure.
The Company generally places a loan or lease on nonaccrual status when payments are contractually past due 90 days, or earlier when doubt exists as to the ultimate collection of payments. The Company may continue to accrue interest on certain loans or leases contractually past due 90 days if such loans or leases are both well secured and in the process of collection. At the time a loan or lease is placed on nonaccrual status, interest previously accrued but uncollected is generally reversed and charged against interest income. Nonaccrual loans and leases are generally returned to accrual status when payments are less than 90 days past due and the Company reasonably expects to collect all payments. If a loan or lease is determined to be uncollectible, the portion of the principal determined to be uncollectible will be charged against the allowance for loan and lease losses. Income on nonaccrual loans or leases is recognized on a cash basis when and if actually collected.
(The remainder of this page intentionally left blank)
14
Table of ContentsThe following table presents information concerning nonperforming assets, including nonaccrual and certain restructured loans and leases and foreclosed assets held for sale.
Nonperforming Assets
The increase in foreclosed assets held for sale and repossessions is primarily attributable to the Company gaining title and possession during the first quarter of 2005 to a large piece of improved real estate which was in nonaccrual loan status at December 31, 2004.
Allowance and Provision for Loan and Lease Losses
Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses: The following table shows an analysis of the allowance for loan and lease losses for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 and the year ended December 31, 2004.
15
Table of ContentsProvisions to and the adequacy of the allowance for loan and lease losses are based on managements judgment and evaluation of the loan and lease portfolio utilizing objective and subjective criteria. The objective criteria utilized by the Company to assess the adequacy of its allowance for loan and lease losses and required additions to such reserve are (1) an internal grading system, (2) a peer group analysis and (3) an historical analysis. In addition to these objective criteria, the Company subjectively assesses adequacy of the allowance for loan and lease losses and the need for additions thereto, with consideration given to the nature and volume of the portfolio, overall portfolio quality, review of specific problem loans and leases, national, regional and local business and economic conditions that may affect the borrowers or lessees ability to pay or the value of property securing loans and leases, and other relevant factors.
The Companys allowance for loan and lease losses was $16.4 million at March 31, 2005, or 1.40% of total loans and leases, compared with $16.1 million, or 1.42% of total loans, at December 31, 2004 and $14.5 million, or 1.52% of total loans, at March 31, 2004. The increase in the Companys allowance for loan and lease losses from December 31, 2004 and March 31, 2004 primarily reflects the growth in the Companys loan and lease portfolio. While management believes the current allowance is adequate, changing economic and other conditions may require future adjustments to the allowance for loan and lease losses.
Provision for Loan and Lease Losses: The loan and lease loss provision is based on managements judgment and evaluation of the loan and lease portfolio utilizing the criteria discussed above. The provision for loan and lease losses was $500,000 for the first quarter of 2005 compared to $745,000 for the first quarter of 2004.
Investment Securities
The Companys investment securities portfolio is the second largest component of earning assets and a significant source of revenue. The Company determines the funds available for investment based upon anticipated loan and lease and deposit growth, liquidity needs, pledging requirements and other factors. The table below presents the book value and the fair value of investment securities on each of the dates indicated.
Investment Securities
The Companys investment securities portfolio is reported net of unrealized losses of $7.9 million at March 31, 2005 and $2.9 million at December 31, 2004, and net of unrealized gains of $2.3 million at March 31, 2004. At March 31, 2005 management believes that all of its unrealized losses on investment securities available for sale are the result of fluctuations in interest rates and do not reflect any deterioration in the credit quality of its investments. Accordingly management considers these unrealized losses to be temporary in nature and the Company has both the ability and the intent to hold these investments until maturity or until such time as fair value recovers above cost.
Deposits
The Companys bank subsidiary lending and investment activities are funded primarily by deposits, approximately 58.2% of which were time deposits and approximately 41.8% of which were demand and savings deposits at March 31, 2005. The Companys total deposits were $1.394 billion at March 31, 2005, as compared to $1.380 billion at December 31, 2004 and $1.147 billion at March 31, 2004.
16
Table of ContentsLiquidity and Capital Resources
Growth and Expansion. During the first quarter of 2005, the Company relocated its temporary banking office in Mountain Home, Arkansas to its first permanent office there. The Company also added three new Arkansas banking offices including its fourth office in North Little Rock, its second office in Mountain Home and its first office in Bentonville. All of these offices are in permanent facilities except the Bentonville office which is in a temporary facility until a permanent banking office is completed.
At March 31, 2005, the Company, through its state chartered subsidiary bank, conducted banking operations through 51 offices in 28 communities throughout northern, western and central Arkansas, three Texas banking offices, and loan production offices in Little Rock, Arkansas and Charlotte, North Carolina.
Early in the second quarter of 2005, the Company opened a loan production office in Fayetteville, Arkansas and subsequently converted this loan production office to a temporary banking office. The Company also expects to add its second permanent banking office in Benton, Arkansas during the second quarter.
The Company expects to continue its growth and de novo branching strategy. For the full year of 2005, it expects to open between eight and eleven new banking offices, depending, among other factors, on the time required to obtain permits and approvals and to design, construct, equip and staff such offices. Opening new offices or converting existing loan production offices to banking offices is subject to availability of suitable sites, hiring qualified personnel, obtaining regulatory and other approvals and many other conditions and contingencies that the Company cannot predict with certainty.
During the first three months of 2005, the Company spent $6.9 million on capital expenditures for premises and equipment. The Companys capital expenditures for the full year of 2005 are expected to be in the range of $20 to $29 million including progress payments on construction projects expected to be completed in 2005 and 2006, furniture and equipment costs and acquisition of sites for future development. Actual expenditures may vary significantly from those expected, primarily depending on the number and cost of additional sites acquired for future development and construction projects commenced.
Bank Liquidity. Liquidity represents an institutions ability to provide funds to satisfy demands from depositors, borrowers and lessees by either converting assets into cash or accessing new or existing sources of incremental funds. Generally the Companys bank subsidiary relies on customer deposits and loan and lease repayments as its primary sources of funds. The Company has used these funds, together with Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) advances and other borrowings, to make loans and leases, acquire investment securities and other assets and to fund continuing operations.
Deposit levels may be affected by a number of factors, including rates paid by competitors, general interest rate levels, returns available to customers on alternative investments and general economic and market conditions. Loan and lease repayments are a relatively stable source of funds but are subject to the borrowers and lessees ability to repay the loans and leases, which can be adversely affected by a number of factors including changes in general economic conditions, adverse trends or events affecting business industry groups, reductions in real estate values or markets, business closings or lay-offs, inclement weather and natural disasters. Furthermore, loans and leases generally are not readily convertible to cash. Accordingly, the Company may be required from time to time to rely on secondary sources of liquidity to meet loan, lease and withdrawal demands or otherwise fund operations. Such sources include FHLB advances, federal funds lines of credit from correspondent banks, Federal Reserve Bank (FRB) borrowings and brokered deposits.
At March 31, 2005 the Companys bank subsidiary had substantial unused borrowing availability. This availability was primarily comprised of the following four sources: (1) $143.9 million of available blanket borrowing capacity with the FHLB, (2) $62.7 million of investment securities available to pledge for federal funds borrowings, (3) $15.0 million of available unsecured federal funds borrowing lines and (4) up to $124.3 million from borrowing programs of the FRB. As of March 31, 2005, the Company had outstanding brokered deposits of $95.0 million.
Management anticipates the Companys bank subsidiary will continue to rely primarily on customer deposits and loan and lease repayments to provide liquidity. Additionally, where necessary, the sources of funds described above will be used to augment the Companys primary funding sources.
17
Table of ContentsCapital Compliance. Bank regulatory authorities in the United States impose certain capital standards on all bank holding companies and banks. These capital standards require compliance with certain minimum risk-based capital ratios and a minimum leverage ratio. The risk-based capital ratios consist of (1) Tier 1 capital (i.e. common stockholders equity excluding goodwill, certain intangibles and net unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale investment securities, but including, subject to limitations, trust preferred securities (TPS) and other qualifying items) to risk-weighted assets and (2) total capital (Tier 1 capital plus Tier 2 capital which is the qualifying portion of the allowance for loan and lease losses and the portion of TPS not counted as Tier 1 capital) to risk-weighted assets. The leverage ratio is measured as Tier 1 capital to adjusted quarterly average assets.
The Companys risk-based capital and leverage ratios exceeded these minimum requirements at March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, and are presented below, followed by the risk-based capital and leverage ratios of the Companys bank subsidiary at March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004.
Consolidated Capital Ratios
Capital Ratios of Bank Subsidiary
(The remainder of this page intentionally left blank)
18
Table of ContentsDividend Policy. During the first quarter of 2005, the Company paid a dividend of $0.08 per share compared to $0.07 per share during the first quarter of 2004. On April 19, 2005, the Companys board of directors approved a dividend of $0.09 per share to be paid during the second quarter of 2005. The determination of future dividends on the Companys common stock will depend on conditions existing at that time. The Companys goal is to continue at approximately the current level of quarterly dividend with consideration given to future changes depending on the Companys earnings, capital and liquidity needs.
Critical Accounting Policy
Managements determination of the adequacy of the allowance for loan and lease losses is considered to be a critical accounting policy. Provisions to and the adequacy of the allowance for loan and lease losses are based on managements judgment and evaluation of the loan and lease portfolio utilizing objective and subjective criteria. Changes in these criteria or the availability of new information could cause the allowance to be increased or decreased in future periods. In addition bank regulatory agencies, as part of their examination process, may require adjustments to the allowance for loan and lease losses based on their judgments and estimates.
Forward-Looking Information
This Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, other filings made by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission and other oral and written statements or reports by the Company and its management, include certain forward-looking statements including, without limitation, statements about economic and competitive conditions, goals and expectations for net income, earnings per share, net interest margin including the effects of the Companys efforts to increase variable rate loans as a percentage of its total loans, net interest income, non-interest income, including service charge, mortgage lending and trust income, non-interest expense, efficiency ratio, asset quality, nonperforming loans and leases, nonperforming assets, net charge-offs, past due loans and leases, interest rate sensitivity including the effects of possible interest rate changes on our net interest margin and net interest income, future growth and expansion, including the plans for opening new offices and converting loan production offices to full-service banking offices, opportunities and goals for market share growth, loan, lease and deposit growth and other similar forecasts and statements of expectation. Words such as anticipate, believe, estimate, expect, intend and similar expressions, as they relate to the Company or its management, identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements made by the Company and its management are based on estimates, projections, beliefs and assumptions of management at the time of such statements and are not guarantees of future performance. The Company disclaims any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statement based on the occurrence of future events, the receipt of new information or otherwise.
Actual future performance, outcomes and results may differ materially from those expressed in forward-looking statements made by the Company and its management due to certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Certain factors that may affect operating results of the Company include, but are not limited to, the following: (1) potential delays or other problems in implementing the Companys growth and expansion strategy including delays in identifying satisfactory sites, obtaining permits, designing, constructing and opening new offices, obtaining regulatory and other approvals and employing additional personnel; (2) the ability to attract new deposits and loans; (3) interest rate fluctuations; (4) competitive factors and pricing pressures; (5) general economic conditions, including their effect on investment securities values and on the credit worthiness of borrowers and collateral values; (6) changes in legal and regulatory requirements; (7) adoption of new accounting standards or changes in existing accounting requirements; and (8) adverse results in future litigation, as well as other factors described in this and other Company reports and statements. Should one or more of the foregoing risks materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results or outcomes may vary materially from those described in the forward-looking statements.
(The remainder of this page intentionally left blank)
19
Table of ContentsSelected and Supplemental Financial Data
The following table sets forth selected consolidated financial data of the Company for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, and is qualified in its entirety by the consolidated financial statements, including the notes thereto, included elsewhere herein.
Selected Consolidated Financial Data (Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) Unaudited
20
Table of ContentsBank of the Ozarks, Inc. Supplemental Quarterly Financial Data (Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) Unaudited
21
Table of ContentsPART I (continued)
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
The Companys interest rate risk management is the responsibility of the ALCO and Investments Committee (ALCO), which reports to the board of directors. The ALCO establishes policies that monitor and coordinate the Companys sources, uses and pricing of funds. The ALCO is also involved with management in the Companys planning and budgeting process.
The Company regularly reviews its exposure to changes in interest rates. Among the factors considered are changes in the mix of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, interest rate spreads and repricing periods. Typically the ALCO reviews on at least a quarterly basis the bank subsidiarys relative ratio of rate sensitive assets (RSA) to rate sensitive liabilities (RSL) and the related cumulative gap for different time periods. Additionally, the ALCO and management utilize a simulation model in assessing the Companys interest rate sensitivity.
This simulation modeling process projects a baseline net interest income (assuming no changes in interest rate levels) and estimates changes to that baseline net interest income resulting from changes in interest rate levels. The Company relies primarily on the results of this model in evaluating its interest rate risk. In addition to the data in the gap table presented below, this model incorporates a number of additional factors. These factors include (1) the expected exercise of call features on various assets and liabilities, (2) the expected rates at which various RSA and RSL will reprice, (3) the expected growth in various interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and the expected rates on such new assets and liabilities, (4) the expected relative movements in different interest rate indexes which are used as the basis for pricing or repricing various assets and liabilities, (5) existing and expected contractual cap and floor rates on various assets and liabilities, (6) expected changes in administered rates on interest-bearing transaction, savings, money market and time deposit accounts and the expected impact of competition on the pricing or repricing of such accounts and (7) other factors. Inclusion of these factors in the model is intended to more accurately project the Companys changes in net interest income resulting from interest rate changes. The Company models its change in net interest income assuming interest rates go up 100 bps, up 200 bps, down 100 bps and down 200 bps. For purposes of this model, the Company has assumed that the change in interest rates phases in over the 12-month period commencing April 1, 2005. While the Company believes this model provides a more accurate projection of its interest rate risk, the model includes a number of assumptions and predictions which may or may not be correct and may impact the model results. These assumptions and predictions include inputs to compute baseline net interest income, growth rates, competition and a variety of other factors that are difficult to accurately predict. Accordingly, there can be no assurance the simulation model will reflect future results.
The following table presents the simulation models projected impact of a change in interest rates on the projected baseline net interest income for a 12-month period commencing April 1, 2005. This change in interest rates does not take into account changes in the slope of the yield curve.
In the event of a shift in interest rates, management may take certain actions intended to mitigate the negative impact to net interest income or to maximize the positive impact to net interest income. These actions may include, but are not limited to, restructuring of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, seeking alternative funding sources or investment opportunities and modifying the pricing or terms of loans and deposits.
The Companys simple static gap analysis is shown in the following table. At March 31, 2005 the cumulative ratios of RSA to RSL at six months and one year were 82.30% and 84.83%, respectively. A financial institution is considered to be liability sensitive, or as having a negative gap, when the amount of its interest-bearing liabilities maturing or repricing within a given time period exceeds the amount of its interest-earning assets also maturing or repricing within that time period. Conversely, an institution is considered to be asset sensitive, or as having a positive gap, when the amount of its interest-bearing liabilities maturing and repricing is less than the amount of its interest-earning assets also maturing or repricing during the same period. Generally, in a falling interest rate environment, a negative gap should result in an increase in net interest income, and in a rising interest rate environment this negative gap should adversely affect net interest income. The converse would be true for a positive gap. Due to inherent limitations in any static gap analysis and since conditions change on a daily basis, these expectations may not reflect future results. As already noted the Company believes the simulation model results presented above are a more meaningful estimate of its interest rate risk.
22
Table of ContentsRate Sensitive Assets and Liabilities
The data used in the table above is based on contractual repricing dates for variable or adjustable rate instruments except for non-maturity interest-bearing deposit accounts. With respect to non-maturity interest-bearing deposit accounts, management believes these deposit accounts are core to the Companys banking operations and do not reprice on a one-to-one basis as a result of interest rate movements. At March 31, 2005 management estimates the co-efficient for change in interest rates is approximately 18% for its interest-bearing money market account balances, approximately 38% for its MaxYield account balances and approximately 7% for its other interest-bearing transaction and savings account balances. Accordingly management has included these portions of the non-maturity interest-bearing deposit accounts as repricing immediately, with the remaining portions shown as repricing beyond five years. Management revises its estimates of these co-efficients for change periodically, typically quarterly, based on its ongoing assessment of competitive conditions, its relative level of interest rates paid compared to the rates paid by competitors, its expectations and strategies for adjusting its rate paid as market rates change, and other factors. Callable investment securities or borrowings are scheduled on their contractual maturity unless the Company has received notification the investment security or borrowing will be called. In the event the Company has received notification of call, the investment security or borrowing is placed in the fixed rate category for the time period in which the call occurs or is expected to occur. Collateralized mortgage obligations and other mortgage-backed securities are scheduled over maturity periods utilizing Bloomberg consensus prepayment speeds based on interest rate levels at that time. Other financial instruments are scheduled on their contractual maturity.
The Companys variable rate loans were 41.2% of total loans and leases at March 31, 2005, compared to 33.6% of total loans and leases at March 31, 2004. Over the past several years the Company has sought to increase variable rate loans as a percentage of its total loans and leases in order to better manage interest rate risk. The Company believes this increase in variable rate loans has reduced the interest rate risk in its loan and lease portfolio. The Company intends to continue its efforts to increase the percentage of variable rate loans to total loans and leases as part of its strategy to manage interest rate risk. At March 31, 2005, total outstanding loans and leases repricing or repaying within one year, two years and three years totaled 60%, 72% and 83%, respectively, of total outstanding loans and leases. These loans and leases repricing or repaying include variable rate loans that are repricing, fixed rate loans and leases that are maturing and principal cash flows from regularly scheduled payments on fixed rate loans and leases during each of the respective time periods.
This simple gap analysis gives no consideration to a number of factors which can have a material impact on the Companys interest rate risk position. Such factors include among other things, call features on certain assets and liabilities, prepayments, interest rate floors and caps on various assets and liabilities, the current interest rates on assets and liabilities to be repriced in each period, and the relative changes in interest rates on different types of assets and liabilities.
(The remainder of this page intentionally left blank)
23
Table of ContentsItem 4. Controls and Procedures.
(a) Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures.
An evaluation as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of the Companys management, including the Companys Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and its Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures, which are defined under SEC rules as controls and other procedures of a company that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within required time periods. Based upon that evaluation, the Companys Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and its Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer, concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
(b) Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting.
The Companys management, including the Companys Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and its Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer, has evaluated any changes in the Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarterly period covered by this report, and has concluded that there was no change during the quarterly period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
(The remainder of this page intentionally left blank)
24
Table of ContentsOther Information
The Company is party to various litigation matters arising in the ordinary course of business. Although the ultimate resolution of these matters cannot be determined at this time, management of the Company does not believe that such matters, individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on the future results of operations or financial condition of the Company.
Item 2. Changes in Securities, Use of Proceeds and Issuer Purchase of Equity Securities
The Company did not purchase any of its common stock during the quarter covered by this report.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
Not Applicable
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
The 2005 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company was held on April 19, 2005. The following item of business was presented to the stockholders:
The fourteen (14) directors were elected as proposed in the Proxy Statement dated March 11, 2005, under the caption Election of Directors with votes cast as follows:
Not Applicable
Reference is made to the Exhibit Index contained at the end of this report.
25
Table of Contents
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
26
Table of ContentsExhibit Index
27 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||