Burlington Northern Santa Fe 10-K 2010
Documents found in this filing:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
[x] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2009
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM ___________TO ___________
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER: 1-11535
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Table of Contents
Item 1. Business
Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corporation (BNSF, Registrant or Company) was incorporated in the State of Delaware on December 16, 1994. On September 22, 1995, the shareholders of Burlington Northern Inc. (BNI) and Santa Fe Pacific Corporation (SFP) became the shareholders of BNSF pursuant to a business combination of the two companies.
On December 30, 1996, BNI merged with and into SFP. On December 31, 1996, The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company merged with and into Burlington Northern Railroad Company (BNRR), and BNRR changed its name to The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company. On January 2, 1998, SFP merged with and into The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company. On January 20, 2005, The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company changed its name to BNSF Railway Company (BNSF Railway).
BNSF is a holding company that conducts no operating activities and owns no significant assets other than through its interests in its subsidiaries. Through its subsidiaries, BNSF is engaged primarily in the freight rail transportation business. At December 31, 2009, BNSF and its subsidiaries had approximately 35,000 employees. The rail operations of BNSF Railway Company (BNSF Railway), the principal operating subsidiary, comprise one of the largest railroad systems in North America.
Berkshire Hathaway Inc., a Delaware corporation (Berkshire), R Acquisition Company, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Berkshire (Merger Sub), and the Company have entered into a definitive Agreement and Plan of Merger (the Merger Agreement) dated as of November 2, 2009. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement and subject to the conditions set forth therein, the Company will merge with and into Merger Sub (the Merger) with Merger Sub surviving as an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Berkshire. The Merger is subject to the approval of (i) the holders of at least 66-2/3% of the issued and outstanding shares of Company common stock not owned by Berkshire or any of its affiliates or associates and (ii) the holders of a majority of the issued and outstanding shares of Company common stock, as well as to the satisfaction or waiver of other conditions as provided in the Merger Agreement. The Merger is expected to be completed on February 12, 2010. Further information on the proposed Merger is incorporated by reference from Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
BNSF’s internet address is www.bnsf.com. Through this internet Web site (under the “Investors” link), BNSF makes available, free of charge, its Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Current Reports on Form 8-K, as well as all amendments to those reports, as soon as reasonably practicable after these reports are electronically filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC). Filings on Forms 3, 4 and 5 are also available on this Web site as is BNSF’s annual proxy statement. BNSF makes available on its Web site other previously filed SEC reports, registration statements and exhibits via a link to the SEC’s Web site at www.sec.gov. The following documents are also made available on the Company’s Web site:
Further discussion of the Company’s business, including equipment and business sectors, is incorporated by reference from Item 2, “Properties.”
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Changes in government policy could negatively impact demand for the Company’s services, impair its ability to price its services or increase its costs or liability exposure.
Changes in United States and foreign government policies could change the economic environment and affect demand for the Company’s services. For example, changes in clean air laws or regulation of carbon dioxide emissions could reduce the demand for coal and revenues from the coal transportation services provided by BNSF Railway. Also, United States and foreign government agriculture tariffs or subsidies could affect the demand for grain. Developments and changes in laws and regulations as well as increased economic regulation of the rail industry through legislative action and revised rules and standards applied by the U.S. Surface Transportation Board in various areas, including rates, services and access to facilities could adversely impact the Company’s ability to determine prices for rail services and significantly affect the revenues, costs and profitability of the Company’s business. Additionally, because of the significant costs to maintain its rail network, a reduction in profitability could hinder the Company’s ability to maintain, improve or expand its rail network, facilities and equipment. Federal or state spending on infrastructure improvements or incentives that favor other modes of transportation could also adversely affect the Company’s revenues.
The Company’s success depends on its ability to continue to comply with the significant federal, state and local governmental regulations to which it is subject.
The Company is subject to a significant amount of governmental laws and regulation with respect to its rates and practices, railroad operations and a variety of health, safety, labor, environmental and other matters. Failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations could have a material adverse effect on the Company. Governments may change the legislative and/or regulatory framework within which the Company operates without providing the Company with any recourse for any adverse effects that the change may have on its business. Federal legislation enacted in 2008 mandates the implementation of positive train control technology by December 31, 2015, on certain mainline track where intercity and commuter passenger railroads operate and where toxic-by-inhalation hazardous materials are transported. This type of technology is new and deploying it across BNSF Railway’s system and other railroads may pose significant operating and implementation risks and will require significant capital expenditures.
As part of its railroad operations, the Company frequently transports chemicals and other hazardous materials, which could expose it to the risk of significant claims, losses and penalties.
BNSF Railway is required to transport these commodities to the extent of its common carrier obligation. An accidental release of these commodities could result in a significant loss of life and extensive property damage as well as environmental remediation obligations. The associated costs could have an adverse effect on the Company’s operating results, financial condition or liquidity as the Company is not insured above a certain threshold. Further, the rates BNSF Railway receives for transporting these commodities do not adequately compensate it should there be some type of accident. In addition, insurance premiums charged for some or all of the coverage currently maintained by the Company could increase dramatically or certain coverage may not be available to the Company in the future if there is a catastrophic event related to rail transportation of these commodities.
The Company faces intense competition from rail carriers and other transportation providers, and its failure to compete effectively could adversely affect its results of operations, financial condition or liquidity.
The Company operates in a highly competitive business environment. Depending on the specific market, the Company faces intermodal, intramodal, product and geographic competition. This competition from other railroads and motor carriers, as well as barges, ships and pipelines in certain markets, may be reflected in pricing, market share, level of services, reliability and other factors. For example, the Company believes that high service truck lines, due to their ability to deliver non-bulk products on an expedited basis, have had and will continue to have an adverse effect on the Company’s ability to compete for deliveries of non-bulk, time-sensitive freight. While the Company must build or acquire and maintain its rail system, trucks and barges are able to use public rights-of-way maintained by public entities. Any material increase in the capacity and quality of these alternative methods or the passage of legislation granting greater latitude to motor carriers with respect to size and weight restrictions could have an adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations, financial condition or liquidity. In addition, a failure to provide the level of service required by the Company’s customers could result in loss of business to competitors. Changes in the ports used by ocean carriers or the use of all-water routes from the Pacific Rim to the East Coast or other changes in the supply chain could also have an adverse effect on the Company’s volumes and revenues.
Downturns in the economy could adversely affect demand for the Company’s services.
Significant, extended negative changes in domestic and global economic conditions that impact the producers and consumers of the commodities transported by the Company may have an adverse effect on the Company’s operating results, financial condition or liquidity. Declines in or muted manufacturing activity, economic growth and international trade all could result in reduced revenues in one or more business units.
Negative changes in general economic conditions could lead to disruptions in the credit markets, increase credit risks and could adversely affect the Company’s financial condition or liquidity.
Challenging economic conditions may not only affect revenues due to reduced demand for many goods and commodities, but could result in payment delays, increased credit risk and possible bankruptcies of customers. Railroads are capital-intensive and must finance a portion of the building and maintenance of infrastructure as well as locomotives and other rail equipment. Economic slowdowns and related credit market disruptions may adversely affect the Company’s cost structure, its timely access to capital to meet financing needs and costs of its financings. The Company could also face increased counterparty risk for its cash investments and its hedge arrangements. Adverse economic conditions could also affect the Company’s costs for insurance or its ability to acquire and maintain adequate insurance coverage for risks associated with the railroad business if insurance companies experience credit downgrades or bankruptcies. Declines in the securities and credit markets could also affect the Company’s pension fund and railroad retirement tax rates, which in turn could increase funding requirements.
The Company is subject to stringent environmental laws and regulations, which may impose significant costs on its business operations.
The Company’s operations are subject to extensive federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations concerning, among other things, emissions to the air; discharges to waters; the generation, handling, storage, transportation and disposal of waste and hazardous materials; and the cleanup of hazardous material or petroleum releases. Changes to or limits on carbon dioxide emissions could result in significant capital expenditures to comply with these regulations with respect to BNSF Railway’s diesel locomotives, equipment, vehicles and machinery and its yards and intermodal facilities and the cranes and trucks serving those facilities. Emission regulations could also adversely affect fuel efficiency and increase operating costs. Further, local concerns on emissions and other forms of pollution could inhibit the Company’s ability to build facilities in strategic locations to facilitate growth and efficient operations. In addition, many land holdings are and have been used for industrial or transportation-related purposes or leased to commercial or industrial companies whose activities may have resulted in discharges onto the property. Environmental liability can extend to previously owned or operated properties, leased properties and properties owned by third parties, as well as to properties currently owned and used by the Company’s subsidiaries. Environmental liabilities have arisen and may continue to arise from claims asserted by adjacent landowners or other third parties in toxic tort litigation. The Company’s subsidiaries have been and may continue to be subject to allegations or findings to the effect that they have violated, or are strictly liable under, these laws or regulations. The Company’s operating results, financial condition or liquidity could be adversely affected as a result of any of the foregoing, and it may be required to incur significant expenses to investigate and remediate environmental contamination. The Company records liabilities for environmental cleanup when the amount of its liability is both probable and reasonably estimable.
Fuel supply availability and fuel prices may adversely affect the Company’s results of operations, financial condition or liquidity.
Fuel supply availability could be impacted as a result of limitations in refining capacity, disruptions to the supply chain, rising global demand and international political and economic factors. A significant reduction in fuel availability could impact the Company’s ability to provide transportation services at current levels, increase fuel costs and impact the economy. Each of these factors could have an adverse effect on the Company’s operating results, financial condition or liquidity. If the price of fuel increases substantially, the Company expects to be able to offset a significant portion of these higher fuel costs through its fuel surcharge program. However, to the extent that the Company is unable to maintain and expand its existing fuel surcharge program, increases in fuel prices could have an adverse effect on the Company’s operating results, financial condition or liquidity.
Severe weather and natural disasters could disrupt normal business operations, which would result in increased costs and liabilities and decreases in revenues.
The Company’s success is dependent on its ability to operate its railroad system efficiently. Severe weather and natural disasters, such as tornados, flooding and earthquakes, could cause significant business interruptions and result in increased costs and liabilities and decreased revenues. In addition, damages to or loss of use of significant aspects of the Company’s infrastructure due to natural or man-made disruptions could have an adverse effect on the Company’s operating results, financial condition or liquidity for an extended period of time until repairs or replacements could be made. Additionally, during natural disasters, the Company’s workforce may be unavailable, which could result in further delays. Extreme swings in weather could also negatively affect the performance of locomotives and rolling stock.
The Company’s operational dependencies may adversely affect results of operations, financial condition or liquidity.
Due to the integrated nature of the United States’ freight transportation infrastructure, the Company’s operations may be negatively affected by service disruptions of other entities such as ports and other railroads which interchange with the Company. A significant prolonged service disruption of one or more of these entities could have an adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations, financial condition or liquidity.
Acts of terrorism or war, as well as the threat of war, may cause significant disruptions in the Company’s business operations.
Terrorist attacks and any government response to those types of attacks and war or risk of war may adversely affect the Company’s results of operations, financial condition or liquidity. The Company’s rail lines and facilities could be direct targets or indirect casualties of an act or acts of terror, which could cause significant business interruption and result in increased costs and liabilities and decreased revenues, which could have an adverse effect on operating results and financial condition. Such effects could be magnified if releases of hazardous materials are involved. Any act of terror, retaliatory strike, sustained military campaign or war or risk of war may have an adverse impact on the Company’s operating results and financial condition by causing unpredictable operating or financial conditions, including disruptions of BNSF Railway or connecting rail lines, loss of critical customers or partners, volatility or sustained increase of fuel prices, fuel shortages, general economic decline and instability or weakness of financial markets. In addition, insurance premiums charged for some or all of the coverage currently maintained by the Company could increase dramatically, the coverage available may not adequately compensate it for certain types of incidents and certain coverages may not be available to the Company in the future.
The Company depends on the stability and availability of its information technology systems.
The Company relies on information technology in all aspects of its business. A significant disruption or failure of its information technology systems could result in service interruptions, safety failures, security violations, regulatory compliance failures and the inability to protect corporate information assets against intruders or other operational difficulties. Although the Company has taken steps to mitigate these risks, including Business Continuity Planning, Disaster Recovery Planning and Business Impact Analysis, a significant disruption could adversely affect the Company’s results of operations, financial condition or liquidity. Additionally, if the Company is unable to acquire or implement new technology, it may suffer a competitive disadvantage, which could also have an adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations, financial condition or liquidity.
Personal injury claims constitute a significant expense, and increases in the amount or severity of these claims could adversely affect the Company’s operating results, financial condition and liquidity.
The Company is subject to various personal injury claims by third parties and employees, including claims by employees who worked around asbestos until 1985, when its use at BNSF was substantially eliminated. Personal injury claims by BNSF Railway employees are subject to the Federal Employees’ Liability Act (FELA), rather than state workers’ compensation laws. The Company believes that the FELA system, which includes unscheduled awards and a reliance on the jury system, can contribute to increased expenses. Future events, such as increases in the number of claims that are filed, developments in legislative and judicial standards and the costs of settling claims, could result in an adverse effect on the Company’s operating results, financial condition and liquidity.
Most of the Company’s employees are represented by unions, and failure to successfully negotiate collective bargaining agreements may result in strikes, work stoppages or substantially higher ongoing labor costs.
A significant majority of BNSF Railway’s employees are union-represented. BNSF Railway’s union employees work under collective bargaining agreements with various labor organizations. Wages, health and welfare benefits, work rules and other issues have traditionally been addressed through industry-wide negotiations. These negotiations have generally taken place over an extended period of time and have previously not resulted in any extended work stoppages. The existing agreements have remained in effect and will continue to remain in effect until new agreements are reached or the Railway Labor Act’s procedures (which include mediation, cooling-off periods and the possibility of Presidential intervention) are exhausted. While the negotiations have not yet resulted in any extended work stoppages, if BNSF Railway is unable to negotiate acceptable new agreements, it could result in strikes by the affected workers, loss of business and increased operating costs as a result of higher wages or benefits paid to union members, any of which could have an adverse effect on the Company’s operating results, financial condition or liquidity.
The unavailability of qualified personnel could adversely affect the Company’s operations.
Changes in demographics, training requirements and the unavailability of qualified personnel, particularly engineers and trainmen, could negatively impact the Company’s ability to meet demand for rail service. Recruiting and retaining qualified personnel, particularly those with expertise in the railroad industry, are vital to operations. Although the Company has adequate personnel for the current business environment, unpredictable increases in demand for rail services may exacerbate the risk of not having sufficient numbers of trained personnel, which could have a negative impact on operational efficiency and otherwise have a material adverse effect on the Company’s operating results, financial condition or liquidity.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
Item 2. Properties
BNSF Railway operates one of the largest railroad networks in North America with approximately 32,000 route miles of track, excluding multiple main tracks, yard tracks and sidings, approximately 23,000 miles of which are owned route miles, including easements, in 28 states and two Canadian provinces as of December 31, 2009. Approximately 9,000 route miles of BNSF Railway’s system consist of trackage rights that permit BNSF Railway to operate its trains with its crews over other railroads’ tracks.
As of December 31, 2009, the total BNSF Railway system, including single and multiple main tracks, yard tracks and sidings, consisted of approximately 50,000 operated miles of track, all of which are owned by or held under easement by BNSF Railway except for approximately 10,000 route miles operated under trackage rights. At December 31, 2009, approximately 26,000 miles of BNSF Railway’s track consisted of 112-pound per yard or heavier rail, including approximately 20,000 track miles of 131-pound per yard or heavier rail.
BNSF Railway owned or had under non-cancelable leases exceeding one year the following units of railroad rolling stock and other equipment as of the dates shown below. During 2009, BNSF continued phasing out intermodal equipment (domestic chassis, domestic containers and trailers) due to an increase in customers providing their own equipment for services versus BNSF maintaining a rail-controlled fleet. Certain prior period amounts have been adjusted to conform to current year presentation.
Capital Expenditures and Maintenance
The extent of BNSF Railway’s replacement and capacity program is outlined in the following table:
A breakdown of the Company’s cash capital expenditures for the three years ended December 31, 2009, is incorporated by reference from a table in Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations under the heading “Liquidity and Capital Resources; Investing Activities.”
BNSF’s planned 2010 capital commitments are incorporated by reference from Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations under the heading “Executive Summary; Capital Commitment Outlook for 2010.”
As of December 31, 2009, General Electric Company and Electro-Motive Diesel, Inc. performed locomotive maintenance and overhauls for BNSF Railway at its facilities under various maintenance agreements that covered approximately 4,000 locomotives.
Property and Facilities
BNSF Railway operates various facilities and equipment to support its transportation system, including its infrastructure and locomotives and freight cars. It also owns or leases other equipment to support rail operations, including containers, chassis and vehicles. Support facilities for rail operations include yards and terminals throughout its rail network, system locomotive shops to perform locomotive servicing and maintenance, a centralized network operations center for train dispatching and network operations monitoring and management in Fort Worth, Texas, regional dispatching centers, computers, telecommunications equipment, signal systems and other support systems. Transfer facilities are maintained for rail-to-rail as well as intermodal transfer of containers, trailers and other freight traffic. These facilities include 31 major intermodal hubs located across the system. BNSF Railway’s largest intermodal facilities in terms of 2009 volume were as follows:
BNSF Railway owns 22 automotive distribution facilities and serves eight port facilities where automobiles are loaded on or unloaded from multi-level rail cars in the United States and Canada.
BNSF Railway’s largest freight car classification yards based on the average daily number of cars processed (excluding cars that do not change trains at the terminal, intermodal and coal cars) are shown below:
As of December 31, 2009, certain BNSF Railway properties and other assets were subject to liens securing $94 million of mortgage debt. Certain locomotives, rolling stock and facilities of BNSF Railway were subject to equipment leases and financing obligations, as referred to in Notes 9 and 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Productivity, as measured by thousand gross ton miles per employee, is shown in the table below. Gross ton miles is defined as the product of the number of loaded and empty miles traveled and the combined weight of the car and contents.
A discussion of Employees and Labor Relations is incorporated by reference from Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, under the heading “Other Matters; Employee and Labor Relations.”
In serving the Midwest, Pacific Northwest and the Western, Southwestern and Southeastern regions and ports of the country, BNSF transports, through one operating transportation services segment, a range of products and commodities derived from manufacturing, agricultural and natural resource industries. Over half of the freight revenues of the Company are covered by contractual agreements of varying durations,while the balance is subject to common carrier, published prices or quotations offered by the Company. BNSF’s financial performance is influenced by, among other things, general and industry economic conditions at the international, national and regional levels. The following map illustrates the Company’s primary routes, including trackage rights, which allow BNSF to access major cities and ports in the western and southern United States as well as Canadian and Mexican traffic. In addition to major cities and ports, BNSF efficiently serves many smaller markets by working closely with approximately 200 shortline partners. BNSF has also entered into marketing agreements with CSX Transportation, Canadian National Railway Company and Kansas City Southern Railway Company, expanding the marketing reach for each railroad and their customers.
The Consumer Products’ freight business provided approximately 32 percent of freight revenues in 2009 and consisted of the following business sectors:
In 2009, the transportation of coal contributed about 26 percent of freight revenues. BNSF is one of the largest transporters of low-sulfur coal in the United States. More than 90 percent of all BNSF’s coal tons originated from the Powder River Basin of Wyoming and Montana. These coal shipments were destined for coal-fired electric generating stations located primarily in the North Central, South Central, Southeast, Mountain and Pacific Northwest regions of the United States. BNSF also transports coal from the Powder River Basin to markets in Canada, the eastern United States and Asian markets. Demand for Powder River Basin coal has increased substantially over time due to its relatively low sulfur content, abundant reserves, relatively inexpensive mine production and competitive-delivered cost to power plants.
Other BNSF coal shipments originate principally in Colorado, New Mexico and North Dakota. These shipments move to electrical generating stations and industrial plants in the Mountain and North Central regions of the United States and to Mexico.
The Industrial Products’ freight business provided approximately 21 percent of BNSF’s freight revenues in 2009 and consisted of the following five business areas:
The transportation of Agricultural Products provided approximately 21 percent of 2009 freight revenues. These products include wheat, corn, bulk foods, soybeans, oil seeds and meals, feeds, barley, oats and rye, flour and mill products, milo, oils, specialty grains, malt, ethanol and fertilizer. The BNSF system is strategically located to serve the grain-producing regions of the Midwest and Great Plains. The Company continues to develop and operate a shuttle network for grain and grain products, which allows more efficient use of equipment and improved cycle times. In addition to serving most grain-producing areas, BNSF serves a variety of terminal, storage, feeding and food-processing locations. Furthermore, BNSF has direct access to major export markets via the Pacific Northwest, western Great Lakes, Texas Gulf and Mexican gateways.
The following table sets forth certain freight statistics relating to rail operations for the periods indicated.
Revenues, cars/units and average revenue per car/unit information for the three years ended December 31, 2009, is incorporated by reference from a table in Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, under the heading “Results of Operations; Revenue Table.”
Government Regulation and Legislation
The Company is subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations generally applicable to all businesses. Rail operations are subject to the regulatory jurisdiction of the Surface Transportation Board (STB) of the United States Department of Transportation (DOT), the Federal Railroad Administration of the DOT, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), as well as other federal and state regulatory agencies and Canadian regulatory agencies for operations in Canada. The STB has jurisdiction over disputes and complaints involving certain rates, routes and services, the sale or abandonment of rail lines, applications for line extensions and construction and consolidation or merger with, or acquisition of control of, rail common carriers. The outcome of STB proceedings can affect the profitability of BNSF’s business.
DOT and OSHA have jurisdiction under several federal statutes over a number of safety and health aspects of rail operations, including the transportation of hazardous materials. State agencies regulate some aspects of rail operations with respect to health and safety in areas not otherwise preempted by federal law.
BNSF Railway’s rail operations, as well as those of its competitors, are also subject to extensive federal, state and local environmental regulation. These laws cover discharges to water, air emissions, toxic substances and the generation, handling, storage, transportation and disposal of waste and hazardous materials. This regulation has the effect of increasing the cost and liabilities associated with rail operations. Environmental risks are also inherent in rail operations, which frequently involve transporting chemicals and other hazardous materials.
Many of BNSF Railway’s land holdings are and have been used for industrial or transportation-related purposes or leased to commercial or industrial companies whose activities may have resulted in discharges onto the property. As a result, BNSF Railway is now subject to, and will from time to time continue to be subject to, environmental cleanup and enforcement actions. In particular, the federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), also known as the Superfund law, generally imposes joint and several liability for cleanup and enforcement costs on current and former owners and operators of a site, without regard to fault or the legality of the original conduct. Accordingly, BNSF Railway may be responsible under CERCLA and other federal and state statutes for all or part of the costs to clean up sites at which certain substances may have been released by BNSF Railway, its current lessees, former owners or lessees of properties, or other third parties. BNSF Railway may also be subject to claims by third parties for investigation, cleanup, restoration or other environmental costs under environmental statutes or common law with respect to properties they own that have been impacted by BNSF Railway operations. Further discussion is incorporated by reference from Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Railroad industry personnel are covered by the Railroad Retirement System instead of Social Security. BNSF Railway’s contributions under the Railroad Retirement System have been higher than those in industries covered by Social Security. The Railroad Retirement System, funded primarily by payroll taxes on covered employers and employees, includes a benefit roughly equivalent to Social Security (Tier I), an additional benefit similar to that allowed in some private defined-benefit plans (Tier II) and other benefits. For 2009, the Railroad Retirement System required a 19.75 percent contribution by railroad employers on eligible wages, while the Social Security and Medicare Acts only required a 7.65 percent contribution on similar wage bases.
The business environment in which BNSF Railway operates is highly competitive. Depending on the specific market, deregulated motor carriers and other railroads, as well as river barges, ships and pipelines in certain markets, may exert pressure on price and service levels. The presence of advanced, high service truck lines with expedited delivery, subsidized infrastructure and minimal empty mileage continues to affect the market for non-bulk, time-sensitive freight. The potential expansion of longer combination vehicles could further encroach upon markets traditionally served by railroads. In order to remain competitive, BNSF Railway and other railroads continue to develop and implement operating efficiencies to improve productivity.
As railroads streamline, rationalize and otherwise enhance their franchises, competition among rail carriers intensifies. BNSF Railway’s primary rail competitor in the Western region of the United States is the Union Pacific Railroad Company. Other Class I railroads and numerous regional railroads and motor carriers also operate in parts of the same territories served by BNSF Railway.
Based on weekly reporting by the Association of American Railroads, BNSF’s share of the western United States rail traffic in 2009 was approximately 49 percent.
Employee and Labor Relations
A significant majority of BNSF Railway’s employees are union-represented. Final agreements have been reached in the most recent bargaining round covering 100 percent of BNSF’s unionized workforce. These agreements resolved all wage, work rule, and health and welfare issues through December 31, 2009, and will remain in effect until new agreements are reached or the Railway Labor Act’s procedures (which include mediation, cooling-off periods and the possibility of U.S. presidential intervention) are exhausted. Negotiations for the new bargaining round began November 1, 2009.
In the new bargaining round, an agreement covering wage and work rules issues was reached with the Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen (BLET), representing nearly 7,000 BNSF engineers, which covers the period from January 1, 2010 through December 31, 2014. Also in the new bargaining round, BNSF has joined industry-wide (or “national”) bargaining with all unions on health and welfare issues and with all unions except BLET on wage and work rule issues.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
Beginning May 14, 2007, some 30 similar class action complaints were filed in six federal district courts around the country by rail shippers against BNSF Railway and other Class I railroads alleging that they have conspired to fix fuel surcharges with respect to unregulated freight transportation services in violation of the antitrust laws and seeking injunctive relief and unspecified treble damages. These cases have been consolidated and are currently pending in the federal district court of the District of Columbia for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings. (In re: Rail Freight Fuel Surcharge Antitrust Litigation, MDL No. 1869). Consolidated amended class action complaints were filed against BNSF Railway and three other Class I railroads in April 2008. The Company believes that these claims are without merit and continues to defend against the allegations vigorously. The Company does not believe that the outcome of these proceedings will have a material effect on its financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.
Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corporation and its Board of Directors, and in some cases Berkshire and R Acquisition Company, LLC, are named as defendants in putative class action lawsuits brought by alleged Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corporation stockholders challenging the merger described in Part 1, Item 1 of this Form 10-K. Four stockholder actions were filed in Tarrant County, Texas (the first of which was filed November 3, 2009), three actions were filed in Dallas County, Texas (the first of which was filed November 4, 2009), and five actions were filed in Delaware Chancery Court (the first of which was filed November 5, 2009). The Tarrant County, Texas actions have been consolidated as In re: Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corporation Shareholder Class Action Litigation, Cause No. 348-241465-09. The Dallas County, Texas actions were consolidated under the action styled Employees Retirement System of the City of New Orleans v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corporation, et al., Cause No. 09-14950 and have been abated. Plaintiffs in the Dallas County actions have taken steps seeking to refile or transfer the actions to Tarrant County. The Delaware actions have been consolidated as In re: Burlington Northern Santa Fe Shareholders Litigation, C.A. No. 5043-VCL.
The stockholder actions variously allege that Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corporation’s directors have breached their fiduciary duties based on allegations that (i) the consideration being offered is unfair and inadequate, (ii) Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corporation’s directors did not adequately seek to maximize stockholder value through open bidding or market check mechanisms, (iii) the “no shop” clause and termination fee are onerous devices designed to discourage a superior offer, (iv) Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corporation’s earnings forecasts were manipulated to drive its stock price down and thus make the proposed transaction appear more favorable to stockholders than it truly is, and/or (v) Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corporation’s disclosures relating to the proposed transaction have been, or will be, inadequate and materially misleading. Certain of the stockholder actions also allege that Berkshire aided and abetted the alleged breaches by Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corporation’s directors. The stockholder actions seek various remedies, including enjoining the transaction from being consummated in accordance with the agreed-upon terms.
On January 18, 2010, the parties to the litigation entered into a memorandum of understanding (the memorandum of understanding) providing for a settlement of the litigation, subject to the approval of the Delaware Chancery Court. Pursuant to the memorandum of understanding, the plaintiffs have withdrawn their application for preliminary injunctive relief, which was previously scheduled to be heard in the Delaware Chancery Court on February 3, 2010, and the defendants, while denying all allegations of wrongdoing and denying that the disclosures in the proxy statement/prospectus were inadequate, provided the supplemental disclosures set forth in the Current Report on Form 8-K that was filed on January 20, 2010.
The Company believes these claims are without merit and, if the proposed settlement is not approved, will vigorously defend any further proceedings seeking to prosecute these claims. The Company does not believe that the outcome of these proceedings will have a material effect on its financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.
Information concerning certain pending tax-related administrative or adjudicative state proceedings or appeals is incorporated by reference from Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, and information concerning other claims and litigation is incorporated by reference from Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
No matters were submitted by BNSF to a vote of its securities holders during the fourth quarter of 2009.
Executive Officers of the Registrant
Listed below are the names, ages and positions of all executive officers of BNSF and their business experience during the past five years. Executive officers hold office until their successors are elected or appointed, or until their earlier death, retirement, resignation or removal.
Matthew K. Rose, 50
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of BNSF since March 2002.
Thomas N. Hund, 56
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since January 2001.
Carl R. Ice, 53
Executive Vice President and Chief Operations Officer since January 2001.
John P. Lanigan, Jr., 54
Executive Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer since January 2003.
Linda Longo-Kazanova, 57
Vice President–Human Resources and Medical since May 2007. Prior to that, Senior Vice President, Human Resources and Business Optimization for Bell & Howell Company, later named ProQuest Company, from 2000.
Roger Nober, 45
Executive Vice President Law and Secretary since January 2007. Prior to that, partner of Steptoe & Johnson LLP, Washington, DC (law firm) from March 2006 and Chairman of the United States Surface Transportation Board from November 2002 – January 2006.
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity,
Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
BNSF’s common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “BNI.” Information as to the high and low sales prices of such stock for the two years ended December 31, 2009, and the frequency and amount of dividends declared on such stock during such periods, is set forth in Note 18 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. The approximate number of holders of record of the common stock at February 1, 2010, was 29,000.
Common Stock Repurchases
The following table presents repurchases by the Company of its common stock for each of the three months for the quarter ended December 31, 2009, (shares in thousands):
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
The following financial data should be read in conjunction with Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.” The table below presents, as of and for the dates indicated, selected historical financial information for the Company (in millions, except per share data).
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Management’s discussion and analysis relates to the financial condition and results of operations of Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corporation and its majority-owned subsidiaries (collectively BNSF, Registrant or Company). The principal operating subsidiary of BNSF is the BNSF Railway Company (BNSF Railway) through which BNSF derives substantially all of its revenues. All earnings per share information is stated on a diluted basis. Certain prior period amounts have been adjusted to conform to current year presentation.
Through its subsidiaries, BNSF is engaged primarily in the freight rail transportation business. BNSF’s primary operating subsidiary, BNSF Railway, operates one of the largest North American rail networks with about 32,000 route miles in 28 states and two Canadian provinces. Through its one operating transportation segment, BNSF Railway transports a wide range of products and commodities including Consumer Products, Coal, Industrial Products and Agricultural Products.
Additional operational information, including weekly intermodal and carload unit reports as submitted to the Association of American Railroads (AAR) and annual reports submitted to the Surface Transportation Board (STB), are available on the Company’s Web site at www.bnsf.com/investors.
Fiscal Year 2009 — Financial Overview
Capital Commitment Outlook for 2010
Proposed Merger with Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
Results of Operations
The following table presents BNSF’s revenue information by business group for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007.
Freight revenues include both revenue for transportation services and fuel surcharges. BNSF’s fuel surcharge program is intended to recover its incremental fuel costs when fuel prices exceed a threshold fuel price. Fuel surcharges are calculated differently depending on the type of commodity transported. In certain commodities, fuel surcharge is calculated using a fuel price from a time period that can be up to 60 days earlier. In a period of volatile fuel prices or changing customer business mix, changes in fuel expense and fuel surcharge may significantly differ.
The following table presents fuel surcharge and fuel expense information for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 (in millions).
a Total fuel expense includes locomotive and non-locomotive fuel as well as gains and losses from fuel hedges, which do not impact the fuel surcharge program.
The following table presents BNSF’s expense information for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 (in millions):
Year Ended December 31, 2009, Compared with Year Ended December 31, 2008
BNSF recorded net income for 2009 of $1,721 million, or $5.01 per share. In comparison, net income for 2008 was $2,115 million, or $6.06 per share.
Freight revenues of $13,588 million for 2009 were $3,915 million, or 22 percent lower than 2008. Freight revenues reflected a 16-percent decrease in unit volumes resulting from the economic downturn. Freight revenues included a decrease of $2,029 million in fuel surcharges compared with the same 2008 period. Decreased fuel surcharges were the primary driver of the 8-percent decrease in revenue per car/unit in 2009.
The Consumer Products’ freight business includes a significant intermodal component and consists of the following three business areas: international intermodal, domestic intermodal and automotive.
Consumer Products revenues of $4,316 million for 2009 were $1,748 million, or 29 percent lower than 2008. The decrease in revenue was driven by lower international intermodal, domestic intermodal and automotive volumes primarily due to the economy and lower revenue per unit driven by decreased fuel surcharges.
BNSF is one of the largest transporters of low-sulfur coal in the United States. More than 90 percent of all BNSF’s coal tons originate from the Powder River Basin of Wyoming and Montana.
Coal revenues of $3,564 million for 2009 declined $406 million, or 10 percent, versus a year ago, due to decreased fuel surcharges, lower unit volumes and a $66 million loss in excess of amounts previously accrued related to the unfavorable coal rate case decision during the first quarter of 2009 (see Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements under the heading “Coal Rate Case Decision.”) These declines were partially offset by improved yields and approximately $30 million for contract settlements and adjustments with specific customers.
The Industrial Products’ freight business consists of the following five business areas: construction products, building products, petroleum products, chemicals & plastic products and food & beverages.
Industrial Products revenues of $2,874 million for 2009 decreased $1,154 million, or 29 percent, due to lower unit volumes, driven primarily by decreased demand for construction and building products, and lower fuel surcharges, partially offset by improved yields.
The Agricultural Products’ freight business transports agricultural products including corn, wheat, soybeans, bulk foods, ethanol, fertilizer and other products.
Agricultural Products revenues of $2,834 million for 2009 were $607 million, or 18 percent lower than revenues for 2008. This decrease was due mainly to lower fuel surcharges, as well as lower unit volumes predominately due to reduced domestic loadings and international grain shipments, partially offset by improved yields.
Other revenues decreased $87 million, or 17 percent, to $428 million for 2009 compared to 2008. This decrease was primarily due to a decrease in BNSF Logistics volume-related revenues, which is a wholly-owned, third-party logistics company, and a decrease in charges for storage costs and demurrage.
Total operating expenses for 2009 were $10,754 million, a decrease of $3,352 million, or 24 percent versus 2008.
Compensation and Benefits
Compensation and benefits includes expenses for BNSF employee wages, health and welfare, payroll taxes and other related items. The primary factors influencing the expenses recorded are volume, headcount, utilization, wage rates, incentives earned during the period, benefit plan participation and pension expenses.
Compensation and benefits expenses of $3,481 million were $403 million, or 10 percent lower than 2008. This reduction was primarily the result of decreased unit volumes, effective cost controls, as well as lower incentive compensation costs, which cover nearly all non-union and about one quarter of union employees. The average number of employees decreased 9 percent compared with 2008.
Fuel expense is driven by market price, the level of locomotive consumption of diesel fuel and the effects of hedging activities. Substantially all fuel expense consists of fuel used in locomotives for transportation services. Fuel expense also includes non-locomotive fuel-related costs such as fuel used in vehicles (maintenance of way and other vehicles/equipment), fuel used in refrigerated cars, intermodal facilities’ fuel and fuel-based products used in servicing locomotives.
Fuel expenses of $2,372 million for 2009 were $2,268 million, or 49 percent lower than 2008. The decrease in fuel expense was primarily due to a decrease in the average all-in cost per gallon of locomotive diesel fuel. The average all-in cost per gallon of locomotive diesel fuel decreased by $1.27 to $1.89, or $1,520 million. The decrease in the average all-in cost reflected a decrease in the average purchase price per gallon of $1.43, or a $1,710 million decrease in locomotive fuel expense, offset by an increase in the hedge loss of 16 cents per gallon, or $190 million (2009 loss of $195 million less 2008 loss of $5 million). Locomotive fuel consumption in 2009 decreased 217 million gallons to 1,198 million gallons when compared with consumption in 2008, resulting in a $684 million decrease in fuel expense. The remainder of the decrease was primarily due to lower non-locomotive fuel prices.
Purchased services expense includes the following: ramping (lifting of containers onto and off of rail cars); drayage (highway movements to and from railway facilities); maintenance of locomotives, freight cars and equipment; transportation costs over other railroads; technology services outsourcing; professional services; and other contract services provided to BNSF. Purchased services expense also includes purchased transportation costs for BNSF Logistics. The expenses are driven by the rates established in the related contracts and the volume of services required.
Purchased services expenses of $1,873 million for 2009 were $260 million, or 12 percent lower than 2008. Variable expenses on lower volumes led to decreased costs in ramping, drayage, car repairs and other volume-related costs, including those of BNSF Logistics.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization expenses for the period are determined by using the group method of depreciation, which applies a single rate to the gross investment in a particular class of property. Due to the capital-intensive nature of BNSF’s operations, depreciation expense is a significant component of the Company’s operating expenses. The full effect of inflation is not reflected in operating expenses because depreciation is based on historical cost.
Depreciation and amortization expenses of $1,537 million for 2009 were $140 million, or 10 percent higher than 2008. This increase in depreciation expense was primarily due to capital expenditures.
Equipment rents expense includes long-term and short-term payments primarily for locomotives, freight cars, containers and trailers. The expense is driven primarily by volume, lease and rental rates, utilization of equipment and changes in business mix resulting in equipment usage variances.
Equipment rents expenses for 2009 of $777 million were $124 million, or 14 percent lower than 2008. Improved car velocity, lower volumes and the return of leased equipment all contributed to the decrease.
Materials and Other
Material expenses consist mainly of the costs involved to purchase mechanical and engineering materials, in addition to other items for maintenance of property and equipment. Other expenses principally include personal injury claims, environmental remediation and derailments as well as utilities, locomotive overhauls, property and miscellaneous taxes and employee separation costs. The total is offset by gains on land sales and insurance recoveries.
Materials and other expenses of $714 million for 2009 were $437 million, or 38 percent lower than 2008, due largely to expenses in connection with environmental matters in Montana during the second quarter of 2008, lower derailment and personal injury costs, reduced volumes and effective cost controls.
Interest expense of $613 million for 2009 was $80 million, or 15 percent higher than 2008. This increase was primarily attributable to a net $32 million loss for terminated treasury locks (see Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements). The unfavorable coal rate case decision further increased interest expense by $8 million (see Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements under the heading “Coal Rate Case Decision”). The remainder of the increase was primarily due to a higher average debt balance. Favorable tax settlements impacted interest expense for both 2009 and 2008.
The effective rate in 2009 was 34.8 percent compared with 37.2 percent for the prior year. The decrease was primarily related to a tax benefit related to the fourth-quarter donation of a portion of a line segment located in Washington State. There were also favorable tax settlements for both 2009 and 2008.
Year Ended December 31, 2008, Compared with Year Ended December 31, 2007
BNSF recorded net income for 2008 of $2,115 million, or $6.06 per share. In comparison, net income for 2007 was $1,829 million, or $5.06 per share.
Freight revenues of $17,503 million for 2008 were $2,154 million, or 14 percent higher than 2007. Freight revenues reflected a 3-percent decrease in unit volumes. Freight revenues included an increase of $1,469 million in fuel surcharges compared with the same 2007 period. Growth in prices and fuel surcharges drove average revenue per car/unit up 18 percent in 2008 to $1,751 from $1,488 in 2007.
Consumer Products revenues of $6,064 million for 2008 were $400 million, or 7 percent greater than 2007. Revenue gains were driven by higher revenue per unit due to increased fuel surcharges and improved yields along with slightly higher domestic traffic, partially offset by lower international and automotive volumes caused by economic softness.
Coal revenues of $3,970 million for 2008 rose $691 million, or 21 percent, versus a year ago, due to improved yields, contractual inflation escalators, increased fuel surcharges and higher unit volumes. Despite the flooding impact in the Powder River Basin and Midwest during May and June, 2008 was a record year for coal as volumes grew 2 percent. This was driven by continued strong demand for Powder River Basin coal, leading to organic growth of existing customers and new eastern U.S. conversions of power plants to burn Powder River Basin coal.
Industrial Products revenues increased $344 million, or 9 percent, to $4,028 million for 2008. The 14-percent increase in average revenue per car was mainly the result of higher fuel surcharges and improved yields. Units decreased 4 percent primarily due to a decline in building products resulting from weakness in the housing market, partially offset by increased construction product volumes.
Agricultural Products revenues of $3,441 million for 2008 were $719 million, or 26 percent higher than revenues for 2007. This increase was primarily due to improved yields, higher fuel surcharges and strong unit volume growth in ethanol, corn and soybeans.
Other revenues increased $62 million, or 14 percent, to $515 million for 2008 compared to 2007. This increase was primarily due to an increase in BNSF Logistics revenues and an increase in demurrage charges. The increase in BNSF Logistics revenues was primarily driven by acquisition activities.
Total operating expenses for 2008 were $14,106 million, an increase of $1,790 million, or 15 percent over 2007.
Compensation and Benefits
Compensation and benefits expenses of $3,884 million, were $111 million, or 3 percent higher than 2007. Wage inflation and increased incentive compensation costs, which cover all non-union and about one quarter of union employees, were partially offset by improved productivity and lower pension costs. The average number of employees decreased 1 percent compared with 2007.
Fuel expenses of $4,640 million for 2008 were $1,313 million, or 39 percent higher than 2007. The increase in fuel expense was primarily due to an increase in the average all-in cost per gallon of locomotive diesel fuel, partially offset by a decline in consumption related to improved fuel efficiency and lower volumes. The average all-in cost per gallon of locomotive diesel fuel increased by 94 cents to $3.16, or $1,330 million, which is comprised of an increase in the average purchase price of 91 cents, or $1,294 million, and a decrease in the hedge benefit of 3 cents, or $36 million (2008 loss of $5 million less 2007 benefit of $31 million). Locomotive fuel consumption in 2008 decreased 27 million gallons to 1,415 million gallons when compared with consumption in 2007, resulting in a $60 million decrease in fuel expense. The remainder of the increase was primarily due to higher non-locomotive fuel prices.
Purchased services expenses of $2,133 million for 2008 were $110 million, or 5 percent higher than 2007. Approximately 30 percent of the increase was due to purchased transportation costs for BNSF Logistics. An increase of approximately $30 million in freight car and locomotive contract maintenance expense as well as an increase of approximately $15 million in haulage payments for transportation over other railroads also contributed to the increase.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization expenses of $1,397 million for 2008 were $104 million, or 8 percent higher than 2007. This increase was due to capital expenditures and updated depreciation studies (see discussion under the heading “Critical Accounting Estimates; Depreciation”).
Equipment rents expenses for 2008 of $901 million were $41 million, or 4 percent lower than 2007, due to lower volumes and improved car velocity.
Materials and Other
Materials and other expenses of $1,151 million for 2008, which consisted of approximately $330 million of materials expense with the remainder consisting of numerous other items, were $193 million, or 20 percent higher than 2007. The increase was primarily due to (i) $125 million in higher environmental costs; (ii) a reduction in gains on land sales of about $20 million; (iii) higher derailment costs of about $20 million; and (iv) about $20 million higher property and other miscellaneous taxes.
Interest expense of $533 million for 2008 was $22 million, or 4 percent higher than 2007. This increase was primarily the result of a higher average debt balance, partially offset by the interest associated with a favorable tax settlement.
The effective rate in 2008 was 37.2 percent compared with 38.2 percent for the prior year. The decrease in the effective tax rate primarily reflects a favorable tax settlement.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Liquidity is a company’s ability to generate cash flows to satisfy current and future obligations. Cash generated from operations is BNSF’s principal source of liquidity. BNSF generally funds any additional liquidity requirements through debt issuance, including commercial paper, through leasing of assets and through the sale of a portion of its accounts receivable.
Net cash provided by operating activities was $3,413 million during 2009 compared with $3,977 million during 2008. The decrease was primarily the result of an increase in contributions to the pension plans of $257 million (see Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information) and payment of reparations in the amount of $120 million related to the unfavorable coal rate case decision during 2009 (see Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements under the heading “Coal Rate Case Decision.”)
Net cash provided by operating activities was $3,977 million during 2008 compared with $3,492 million during 2007. The increase was primarily the result of an increase in earnings before depreciation and amortization expense.
Net cash used for investing activities was $2,637 million during 2009 compared with $3,073 million during 2008. The decrease in cash used for investing activities was principally due to decreased acquisition of equipment of $216 million and a $176 million decrease in capital expenditures excluding equipment.
Net cash used for investing activities was $3,073 million during 2008 compared with $2,415 million during 2007. The increase in cash used for investing activities primarily reflects an increase in equipment acquired in 2008 that was not sold and leased back in the same year. This was partially offset by a decrease in capital expenditures excluding equipment.
A breakdown of capital expenditures during 2009, 2008 and 2007 is set forth in the following table (in millions):
a Other primarily includes signals, bridges, structures and other right of way improvements.
Acquisition of equipment includes the acquisition of locomotives, freight cars and other equipment, some or all of which may be sold and leased back by the Company through either an operating or capital lease. The cash received from any such sale-leaseback transaction is included in proceeds from sale of equipment financed in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
Net cash used for financing activities during 2009 was $140 million, primarily related to dividend payments of $546 million and common stock repurchases to satisfy tax withholding obligations for stock option exercises of $16 million, partially offset by net debt borrowings of $296 million, proceeds from stock options exercised of $59 million, proceeds from a facility financing obligation of $51 million and excess tax benefits from equity compensation plans of $29 million.
Aggregate debt to mature in 2010 is $644 million. BNSF’s ratio of net debt to total capitalization was 41.5 percent at December 31, 2009, compared with 44.5 percent at December 31, 2008. The Company’s adjusted net debt to total capitalization was 50.5 percent at December 31, 2009, compared with 54.7 percent at December 31, 2008. BNSF’s adjusted net debt to total capitalization is a non-GAAP measure and should be considered in addition to, but not as a substitute or preferable to, the information prepared in accordance with GAAP. However, management believes that adjusted net debt to total capitalization provides meaningful additional information about the ability of BNSF to service long-term debt and other fixed obligations and to fund future growth.
The following table presents a reconciliation of the calculation of adjusted net debt to total capitalization percentage:
In September 2009, BNSF issued $750 million of 4.70 percent notes due October 1, 2019. The net proceeds from the sale of the notes were used for general corporate purposes including, but not limited to, working capital, capital expenditures and repayment of outstanding indebtedness.
At December 31, 2009, $750 million remained authorized to be issued by the Board of Directors (the Board) through the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) debt shelf registration process.
In July 2009, BNSF Railway entered into an 18-year equipment obligation totaling $75 million to finance locomotives and railcars.
In 2009, BNSF Railway entered into a 12-year capital lease to finance $368 million of locomotives and freight cars. Additionally, BNSF Railway entered into capital leases totaling $146 million to finance maintenance of way and other vehicles and equipment with lease terms of three to seven years.
In 2005, the Company commenced the construction of an intermodal facility that it intended to sell to a third party and subsequently lease back. In 2009, construction of the facility was completed for a cost of approximately $160 million. All improvements have been sold to the third party and BNSF leased the facility from the third party for 20 years. This sale leaseback transaction was accounted for as a financing obligation due to continuing involvement. The outflows from the construction of the facility were classified as investing activities, and the inflows from the associated financing proceeds were classified as financing activities in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
Net cash used for financing activities during 2008 was $601 million, primarily related to common stock repurchases of $1,147 million, including $60 million to satisfy tax withholding obligations for stock option exercises, and dividend payments of $471 million, which were partially offset by net debt borrowings of $772 million, excess tax benefits from equity compensation plans of $96 million, proceeds from stock options exercised of $91 million and proceeds from a facility financing obligation of $68 million.
In November 2008, BNSF issued $500 million of 7.00 percent notes due February 1, 2014. The net proceeds from the sale of the notes were used for general corporate purposes including, but are not limited to, working capital, capital expenditures, repurchase of common stock pursuant to the share repurchase program and repayment of short-term borrowings.
In March 2008, BNSF issued $650 million of 5.75 percent notes due March 15, 2018. The net proceeds from the sale of the notes were used for general corporate purposes including, but not limited to, working capital, capital expenditures, funding debt which matured in 2008, repurchase of common stock pursuant to the share repurchase program and repayment of short-term borrowings.
In 2008, BNSF Railway entered into a capital lease for approximately $158 million to finance locomotives and freight cars. The term of the lease is 20 years. Additionally, BNSF Railway entered into capital leases totaling $100 million to finance maintenance of way and other vehicles and equipment with lease terms of three to seven years.
Net cash used for financing activities during 2007 was $1,122 million, primarily related to common stock repurchases of $1,265 million, including $43 million to satisfy tax withholding obligations for stock option exercises, and dividend payments of $380 million, which were partially offset by net debt borrowings of $234 million, proceeds from stock options exercised of $142 million, excess tax benefits from equity compensation plans of $121 million and proceeds from a facility financing obligation of $41 million.
In April 2007, BNSF issued $650 million of 5.65 percent debentures and $650 million of 6.15 percent debentures due May 1, 2017 and May 1, 2037, respectively. The net proceeds from the sale of the debentures were used for general corporate purposes including, but not limited to, working capital, capital expenditures, funding the maturity of debt which matured in 2007, the repayment of commercial paper and the repurchase of common stock.
In 2007, BNSF Railway entered into several capital leases totaling approximately $325 million to finance locomotives and freight cars. The terms of the leases are between 15 and 20 years. Additionally, BNSF Railway entered into capital leases totaling $119 million to finance maintenance of way and other vehicles and equipment with lease terms of three to seven years.
Common stock dividends declared were $1.60, $1.44 and $1.14 per share annually for 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Dividends paid on common stock were $546 million, $471 million and $380 million during 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. On October 22, 2009, the Board declared a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share on outstanding shares of common stock, payable January 4, 2010 to shareholders of record on December 14, 2009. On January 25, 2010, the Board declared a conditional cash dividend on outstanding shares of common stock to shareholders of record on February 4, 2010. The dividend is expected to be paid on the closing date of the Merger and is contingent upon and subject to the satisfaction or waiver of all closing conditions set for in the Merger Agreement executed in connection with the Merger. If all of the closing conditions to the Merger are satisfied or waived, the dividend will be paid in an amount per share equal to (1) the number of calendar days between (and including) December 15, 2009 and the closing date of the Merger multiplied by (2) $0.0044, rounded to the nearest $0.01 per share. See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information related to the Merger.
Share Repurchase Program
BNSF did not repurchase shares related to its share repurchase program during 2009. During 2008 and 2007, the Company repurchased approximately 12 million and 15 million, respectively, of its common stock at average prices of $92.96 per share and $83.96 per share, respectively. Further information on this repurchase program is incorporated by reference from Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
In February 2007, the Board authorized the extension of the current BNSF share repurchase program, adding 30 million shares to the total of 180 million shares previously authorized in equal amounts in July 1997, December 1999, April 2000, September 2000, January 2003 and December 2005.
Long-Term Debt and Other Obligations
The Company’s business is capital intensive. BNSF has historically generated a significant amount of cash from operating activities, which it uses to fund capital additions, service debt, repurchase shares and pay dividends. Additionally, the Company relies on access to the debt and leasing markets to finance a portion of capital additions on a long-term basis.
In 2009 BNSF took delivery of 331 locomotives under a long-term commitment. At December 31, 2009, BNSF’s remaining commitment was to acquire 537 locomotives by 2013.
In connection with a transaction entered into in 2006, as amended, BNSF has remaining railcar purchase obligations for 837 covered hopper cars through 2010.
The locomotives and freight cars under these agreements have been or are expected to be financed from one or a combination of sources including, but not limited to, cash from operations, capital or operating leases and debt issuances. The decision on the method used for a particular acquisition financing will depend on market conditions and other factors at that time.
The Company’s ratio of earnings to fixed charges was 3.91 and 5.04 times for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Additionally, the Company’s ratio of net cash provided by operating activities divided by total average debt was 34 percent and 46 percent for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The decrease in the ratio of net cash provided by operating activities divided by total average debt was primarily due to decreased earnings and a higher average debt balance.
The following table summarizes the Company’s obligations under long-term debt and other contractual commitments at December 31, 2009 (in millions):
In the normal course of business, the Company enters into long-term contracts for future goods and services needed for the operations of the business. Such commitments are not in excess of expected requirements and are not reasonably likely to result in performance penalties or payments that would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s liquidity.
Commercial paper and the revolving credit agreement are discussed in Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. The $1.2 billion revolving credit agreement includes covenants and events of default typical for this type of facility, including a maximum debt-to-capital test and a $75 million cross-default provision. At December 31, 2009, there were no bank borrowings against the revolving credit agreements, and the Company was in compliance with its debt covenants. BNSF’s maximum debt-to-capital test provides approximately $8 billion of debt capacity above BNSF’s outstanding debt as of December 31, 2009, before an event of default would occur under these covenants. With the exception of a voluntary bankruptcy or insolvency, any event of default has either or both a cure period or notice requirement before termination of the agreement. A voluntary bankruptcy or insolvency would be considered an immediate termination event.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
Sale of Accounts Receivable
The accounts receivable sales program of Santa Fe Receivables Corporation, as described in Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, includes thresholds for dilution, delinquency and write-off ratios that, if exceeded, allow the investors participating in this program, at their option, to cancel the program. These provisions include a maximum debt-to-capital test, which is the same as in the BNSF revolving credit agreements described above. BNSF’s maximum debt-to-capital test provides approximately $8 billion of debt capacity above BNSF’s outstanding debt as of December 31, 2009. At December 31, 2009, the Company’s capacity to sell undivided interests to investors under the accounts receivable sales program was $700 million, which was comprised of two $175 million, 364-day accounts receivable facilities and two $175 million, 3-year accounts receivable facilities. In November 2009, BNSF Railway extended the commitment termination date of the two, 364-day facilities to November 2010. The two 3-year facilities were entered into in November 2007 and have a commitment termination date of November 2010. There was no outstanding undivided interest held by investors as of December 31, 2009. Outstanding undivided interests held by investors under the accounts receivable sales program were $50 million at December 31, 2008.
The amount of undivided interests in the accounts receivable sold by BNSF Railway to investors fluctuates based on borrowing needs and upon the availability of receivables and is directly affected by changing business volumes and credit risks, which may, from time to time, reduce the effective capacity of the program to less than the $700 million. At December 31, 2009, the effective capacity under the accounts receivable sales program was $611 million.
The accounts receivable sales program provides efficient financing at a competitive interest rate as compared with traditional borrowing arrangements and provides diversification of funding sources. See Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information and Note 16 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for information about recent accounting pronouncements that will have an impact on the accounts receivable sales program upon adoption.
The Company acts as guarantor for certain debt and lease obligations. During the past several years, the Company has primarily utilized guarantees to allow third-party entities to obtain favorable terms to finance the construction of assets that will benefit the Company. Additionally, in the ordinary course of business, BNSF enters into agreements with third parties that include indemnification clauses. The Company does not expect performance under these guarantees or indemnities to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s liquidity in the foreseeable future (see Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information).
Due to the capital-intensive nature of BNSF’s business, the full effect of inflation is not reflected in operating expenses because depreciation is based on historical cost. An assumption that all operating assets were depreciated at current price levels would result in substantially greater expense than historically reported amounts.
The Company uses derivatives to hedge against increases in diesel fuel prices and interest rates as well as to convert a portion of its fixed-rate long-term debt to floating-rate debt. The Company does not use derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. The Company formally documents the relationship between the hedging instrument and the hedged item, as well as the risk management objective and strategy for the use of the hedging instrument. This documentation includes linking the derivatives that are designated as fair value or cash flow hedges to specific assets or liabilities on the balance sheet, commitments or forecasted transactions. The Company assesses at the time a derivative contract is entered into, and at least quarterly thereafter, whether the derivative item is effective in offsetting the changes in fair value or cash flows. Any change in fair value resulting from ineffectiveness, as defined by authoritative accounting guidance related to derivatives and hedging, is recognized in current period earnings. For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges, the effective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative instrument is recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss (AOCL) as a separate component of stockholders’ equity and reclassified into earnings in the period during which the hedge transaction affects earnings. Cash flows related to fuel and interest rate hedges are classified as operating activities in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
BNSF monitors its hedging positions and credit ratings of its counterparties and does not anticipate losses due to counterparty nonperformance. As of December 31, 2009, BNSF’s counterparties have credit ratings of A2/A or higher.
BNSF measures the fair value of fuel hedges from data provided by various external counterparties. The Company uses the forward commodity price for the periods hedged to value its fuel-hedge swaps and costless collars. This methodology is a market approach, which under authoritative accounting guidance related to fair value measurements utilizes Level 2 inputs as it uses market data for similar instruments in active markets. Certain of the Company’s fuel-hedge instruments are covered by an agreement which includes a provision such that the Company either receives or posts collateral if the position of the instruments exceeds a certain net asset or net liability threshold, respectively. Further information on BNSF’s fuel hedging program is incorporated by reference from Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
From January 1, 2010, through February 11, 2010, the Company entered into additional swaps utilizing New York Mercantile Exchange (NYMEX) #2 Heating Oil (HO). The supporting tables below provide fuel hedge data for hedges entered into subsequent to December 31, 2009.
From January 1, 2010, through February 11, 2010, the Company entered into additional costless collar agreements utilizing West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude oil. The supporting table below provides fuel hedge data for hedges entered into subsequent to December 31, 2009.
From January 1, 2010, through February 11, 2010, the Company entered into additional swaps utilizing the HO refining spread (HO-WTI). The supporting tables below provide fuel hedge data for hedges entered into subsequent to December 31, 2009.
From time to time, the Company enters into various interest rate hedging transactions for the purpose of managing exposure to fluctuations in interest rates by establishing rates in anticipation of both future debt issuances and the refinancing of leveraged leases, as well as converting a portion of its fixed-rate long-term debt to floating-rate debt. The Company uses interest rate swaps and treasury locks as part of its interest rate risk management strategy.
BNSF’s measurement of the fair value of interest rate derivatives is based on estimates of the mid-market values for the transactions which are provided by the counterparties to these agreements. BNSF reviews these estimates for reasonableness. This methodology is a market approach, which under authoritative accounting guidance related to fair value measurements utilizes Level 2 inputs as it uses market data for similar instruments in active markets. Further information on BNSF’s interest hedging program is incorporated by reference from Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Seattle Sound Transit
In December 2003, BNSF Railway entered into several agreements with Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority (Sound Transit), a government authority established by King, Pierce and Snohomish counties within the State of Washington. BNSF has agreed to sell to Sound Transit, under the threat of condemnation, four easements enabling Sound Transit to offer commuter rail service over existing BNSF track from Seattle to Everett. Sound Transit agreed to pay BNSF approximately $260 million for four commuter easements to operate trains on the segment between Seattle and Everett and entered into agreements both for service on the commuter easements and joint use of track for commuter and freight purposes. The sale proceeds were received between 2003 and 2007 and will be recognized in income over the average life of the associated track structure (approximately 37 years).
New Mexico Department of Transportation
In the fourth quarter of 2005, BNSF Railway Company entered into agreements with the New Mexico Department of Transportation to sell the Company’s rail line and certain adjacent property between Belen, New Mexico and Trinidad, Colorado for $75 million, through a series of sales agreements, while retaining freight easement rights on the line. The Company recognized an impairment charge in 2005 related to this agreement of $71 million. To date, the Company has received all funds and closed on two line segments, recognizing gains of $22 million. The impairment charge and the gains were recorded as a component of materials and other expense.
In the fourth quarter of 2009, BNSF Railway donated a portion of a line segment located in the State of Washington, resulting in a tax benefit of $0.25 per diluted share.
Gain on Land Sale
On January 11, 2010, BNSF transferred operations which completed the sale of a line segment in the State of Washington, which will result in a gain of $74 million in the first quarter of 2010. The gain will be reported in the Consolidated Statement of Income in materials and other.
Critical Accounting Estimates
In the ordinary course of business, the Company makes a number of estimates and assumptions related to the reporting of results of operations and financial position in the preparation of its financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates under different assumptions and conditions. The following discussion addresses the Company’s most critical accounting estimates.
Management has discussed the development and selection of the critical accounting estimates described below with the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors, and the Audit Committee has reviewed the Company’s disclosure relating to them in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
The most significant estimates using management’s judgment for legal claims are made with respect to personal injury claims and environmental matters. These matters are discussed in more detail below.
Personal injury claims, including asbestos claims and employee work-related injuries and third-party injuries (collectively, other personal injury), are a significant expense for the railroad industry. Personal injury claims by BNSF Railway employees are subject to the provisions of the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (FELA) rather than state workers’ compensation laws. FELA’s system of requiring the finding of fault, coupled with unscheduled awards and reliance on the jury system, contributed to increased expenses in past years. Other proceedings include claims by non-employees for punitive as well as compensatory damages. A few proceedings purport to be class actions. The variability present in settling these claims, including non-employee personal injury and matters in which punitive damages are alleged, could result in increased expenses in future years. BNSF has implemented a number of safety programs designed to reduce the number of personal injuries as well as the associated claims and personal injury expense.
BNSF records a liability for personal injury claims when the expected loss is both probable and reasonably estimable. The liability and ultimate expense projections are estimated using standard actuarial methodologies. Liabilities recorded for unasserted personal injury claims are based on information currently available. Due to the inherent uncertainty involved in projecting future events such as the number of claims filed each year, developments in judicial and legislative standards and the average costs to settle projected claims, actual costs may differ from amounts recorded. Expense accruals and any required adjustments are classified as materials and other in the Consolidated Statements of Income.
The Company is party to a number of personal injury claims by employees and non-employees who may have been exposed to asbestos. The heaviest exposure for BNSF employees was due to work conducted in and around the use of steam locomotive engines that were phased out between the years of 1950 and 1967. However, other types of exposures, including exposure from locomotive component parts and building materials, continued after 1967 until they were substantially eliminated at BNSF by 1985.
BNSF assesses its unasserted liability exposure on an annual basis during the third quarter. BNSF determines its asbestos liability by estimating its exposed population, the number of claims likely to be filed, the number of claims that will likely require payment and the estimated cost per claim. Estimated filing and dismissal rates and average cost per claim are determined utilizing recent claim data and trends.
Key elements of the assessment include:
From these assumptions, BNSF projected the incidence of each type of disease to the estimated population to arrive at an estimate of the total number of employees that could potentially assert a claim. Historical claim filing rates were applied for each type of disease to the total number of employees that could potentially assert a claim to determine the total number of anticipated claim filings by disease type. Historical dismissal rates, which represent claims that are closed without payment, were then applied to calculate the number of future claims by disease type that would likely require payment by the Company. Finally, the number of such claims was multiplied by the average settlement value to estimate BNSF’s future liability for unasserted asbestos claims.
The most sensitive assumptions for this accrual are the estimated future filing rates and estimated average claim values. Asbestos claim filings are typically sporadic and may include large batches of claims solicited by law firms. To reflect these factors, BNSF used a multi-year calibration period (i.e., the average historical filing rate for the period 2004-2006) because it believed it would be most representative of its future claim experience. In addition, for non-malignant claims, the number of future claims to be filed against BNSF declines at a rate consistent with both mortality and age as there is a decreasing propensity to file a claim as the population ages. BNSF believes the average claim values by type of disease from the historical period 2005-2007 are most representative of future claim values. Non-malignant claims, which represent approximately 90 percent of the total number and 75 percent of the cost of estimated future asbestos claims, were priced by age of the projected claimants. Historically, the ultimate settlement value of these types of claims is most sensitive to the age of the claimant. A 10-percent increase or decrease in either the forecasted number of unasserted claims or the average claim values would result in an approximate $20 million increase or decrease in the liability recorded for unasserted asbestos claims.
Further discussion on asbestos is incorporated by reference from Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Other Personal Injury
BNSF estimates its other personal injury liability claims and expense quarterly based on the covered population, activity levels and trends in frequency and the costs of covered injuries. Estimates include unasserted claims except for certain repetitive stress and other occupational trauma claims that allegedly result from prolonged repeated events or exposure. Such claims are estimated on an as-reported basis because the Company cannot estimate the range of reasonably possible loss due to other non-work related contributing causes of such injuries and the fact that continued exposure is required for the potential injury to manifest itself as a claim. BNSF has not experienced any significant adverse trends related to these types of claims in recent years.
Key elements of the actuarial assessment include:
From these assumptions, BNSF estimates the number of open claims by accident year that will likely require payment by the Company. The projected number of open claims by accident year that will require payment is multiplied by the expected average cost per claim by accident year and type to determine BNSF’s estimated liability for all asserted claims. Additionally, BNSF estimates the number of its incurred but not reported claims that will likely result in payment based upon historical emergence patterns by type of claim. The estimated number of projected claims by accident year requiring payment is multiplied by the expected average cost per claim by accident year and type to determine BNSF’s estimated liability for incurred but not reported claims.
The most sensitive assumptions for this accrual are the expected average cost per claim and the projected frequency rates for the number of claims that will ultimately result in payment. A 10-percent increase or decrease in either the expected average cost per claim or the frequency rate for claims with payment would result in an approximate $37 million increase or decrease in BNSF’s recorded other personal injury reserves.
Further discussion on other personal injury is incorporated by reference from Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
The Company’s operations, as well as those of its competitors, are subject to extensive federal, state and local environmental regulation. BNSF’s operating procedures include practices to protect the environment from the risks inherent in railroad operations, which frequently involve transporting chemicals and other hazardous materials. Additionally, many of BNSF’s land holdings are and have been used for industrial or transportation-related purposes or leased to commercial or industrial companies whose activities may have resulted in discharges onto the property. As a result, BNSF is subject to environmental cleanup and enforcement actions. In particular, the federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA), also known as the Superfund law, as well as similar state laws, generally impose joint and several liability for cleanup and enforcement costs on current and former owners and operators of a site without regard to fault or the legality of the original conduct. BNSF has been notified that it is a potentially responsible party (PRP) for study and cleanup costs at Superfund sites for which investigation and remediation payments are or will be made or are yet to be determined (the Superfund sites) and, in many instances, is one of several PRPs. In addition, BNSF may be considered a PRP under certain other laws. Accordingly, under CERCLA and other federal and state statutes, BNSF may be held jointly and severally liable for all environmental costs associated with a particular site. If there are other PRPs, BNSF generally participates in the cleanup of these sites through cost-sharing agreements with terms that vary from site to site. Costs are typically allocated based on such factors as relative volumetric contribution of material, the amount of time the site was owned or operated and/or the portion of the total site owned or operated by each PRP.
Liabilities for environmental cleanup costs are recorded when BNSF’s liability for environmental cleanup is probable and reasonably estimable. Subsequent adjustments to initial estimates are recorded as necessary based upon additional information developed in subsequent periods. Environmental costs include initial site surveys and environmental studies as well as costs for remediation of sites determined to be contaminated.
BNSF estimates the ultimate cost of cleanup efforts at its known environmental sites on an annual basis during the third quarter. Ultimate cost estimates for environmental sites are based on historical payment patterns, current estimated percentage to closure ratios and benchmark patterns developed from data accumulated from industry and public sources, including the Environmental Protection Agency and other governmental agencies. These factors incorporate experience gained from cleanup efforts at other similar sites into the estimates for which remediation and restoration efforts are still in progress. The most significant assumptions are as follows: (i) historical payment patterns of site development and (ii) variance from benchmark costs. A 10 percent change in any of these individual assumptions could result in an approximate increase or decrease of approximately $25 million in BNSF’s estimated environmental liability.
Further discussion on environmental is incorporated by reference from Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Other Claims and Litigation
In addition to asbestos, other personal injury and environmental matters discussed above, BNSF and its subsidiaries are also parties to a number of other legal actions and claims, governmental proceedings and private civil lawsuits arising in the ordinary course of business, including those related to disputes and complaints involving certain transportation rates and charges (including complaints seeking refunds of prior charges paid for coal transportation and the prescription of future rates for such movements and claims relating to service under contract provisions or otherwise). Some of the legal proceedings include claims for punitive as well as compensatory damages, and a few proceedings purport to be class actions. Although the final outcome of these matters cannot be predicted with certainty, considering among other things the meritorious legal defenses available and liabilities that have been recorded along with applicable insurance, it is the opinion of BNSF that none of these items, when finally resolved, will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position or liquidity. However, an unexpected adverse resolution of one or more of these items could have a material adverse effect on the results of operations in a particular quarter or fiscal year.
Further discussion on other claims and litigation is incorporated by reference from Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
BNSF is subject to various federal, state and local income taxes in the taxing jurisdictions where the Company operates. BNSF accounts for income taxes by providing for taxes payable or refundable in the current year and for deferred tax assets and liabilities for future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in financial statements or tax returns.
BNSF recorded total income tax expense, including federal, state and other income taxes, of $920 million, $1,253 million and $1,128 million for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. BNSF’s Consolidated Balance Sheets reflect $290 million and $442 million of net current deferred tax assets at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Also included in BNSF’s Consolidated Balance Sheets are $9,322 million and $8,590 million of net non-current deferred tax liabilities at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Classification of deferred tax assets and liabilities as current or non-current is determined by the financial statement classification of the asset or liability to which the temporary difference is related. If a temporary difference is not related to an asset or liability for financial reporting, it is classified according to the expected reversal date of the temporary difference.
Valuation allowances are established to reduce deferred tax assets if it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. BNSF has not recorded a valuation allowance, as it believes that the deferred tax assets will be fully realized in the future.
All federal income tax returns of BNSF are closed through 1999. Internal Revenue Service (IRS) examination of the years 2000 through 2007 for BNSF is completed, and the un-agreed issues for 2000 through 2007 are pending before IRS Appeals. It is anticipated that a settlement with the IRS for the years 2000 through 2005 may be reached within the next twelve months. BNSF is currently under examination for year 2008.
BNSF and its subsidiaries have various state income tax returns in the process of examination, administrative appeal or litigation. State income tax returns are generally subject to examination for a period of three to five years after filing of the respective return. The state impact of any federal changes remains subject to examination by various states for a period of up to one year after formal notification to the states.
A significant portion of the audit issues relate to state income tax issues with various taxing authorities and with the IRS related to whether certain valuations of donated property are appropriate. A provision for taxes resulting from ongoing and future federal and state audits is based on an estimation of aggregate adjustments that may be required as a result of the audits. The Company believes that adequate provision has been made for any adjustment that might be assessed for open years through 2009.
BNSF makes estimates of the potential liability based on its assessment of all potential tax exposures. In addition, the Company uses factors such as applicable tax laws and regulations, current information and past experience with similar issues to make these judgments.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using the tax rates that apply to taxable income in the period in which the deferred tax asset or liability is expected to be realized or paid. Changes in the Company’s estimates regarding the statutory tax rate to be applied to the reversal of deferred tax assets and liabilities could materially affect the effective tax rate.
The Company has not significantly changed its methodology for calculating income tax expense for the years presented, and there are currently no known trends, demands, commitments, events or uncertainties that are reasonably likely to occur and materially affect the methodology or assumptions described above. Further information on federal and state income taxes and uncertain tax positions is incorporated by reference from Notes 2 and 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Employment Benefit Plans
BNSF sponsors a funded, noncontributory qualified pension plan, the BNSF Retirement Plan, which covers most non-union employees, and an unfunded non-tax-qualified pension plan, the BNSF Supplemental Retirement Plan, which covers certain officers and other employees. The benefits under these pension plans are based on years of credited service and the highest consecutive sixty months of compensation for the last ten years of salaried employment with BNSF. BNSF’s funding policy is to contribute annually not less than the regulatory minimum and not more than the maximum amount deductible for income tax purposes with respect to the funded plan.
Certain salaried employees of BNSF that have met age and years of service requirements are eligible for life insurance coverage and medical benefits, including prescription drug coverage, during retirement. This postretirement benefit plan, referred to as the retiree health and welfare plan, is contributory and provides benefits to retirees, their covered dependents and beneficiaries. Retiree contributions are adjusted annually. The plan also contains fixed deductibles, coinsurance and out-of-pocket limitations. The basic life insurance plan is noncontributory and covers retirees only. Optional life insurance coverage is available for some retirees; however, the retiree is responsible for the full cost. BNSF’s policy is to fund benefits payable under the medical and life insurance plans as they come due. Generally, employees beginning salaried employment with BNSF subsequent to September 22, 1995, are not eligible for medical benefits during retirement.
The amounts recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Income for the pension and the retiree health and welfare plans were as follows (in millions):
At December 31, 2009, BNSF had net losses, excluding prior service credits, of $792 million and $25 million related to the pension and retiree health and welfare benefits plans, respectively, which had been recognized as a component of AOCL under authoritative accounting guidance, as described in Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. These losses were comprised of gains and losses from changes in discount rates, actuarial assumptions and census data as well as market gains and losses and will be recognized as a component of net pension and retiree health and welfare costs over the next 17 and 14 years, respectively. The expected amortization of deferred losses is as follows:
The Company estimates liabilities and expenses for the pension and retiree health and welfare plans. Estimated amounts are based on historical information, current information and estimates about future events and circumstances. Significant assumptions used in the valuation of the pension or retiree health and welfare obligations include expected return on plan assets, discount rate, rate of increase in compensation levels and the health care cost trend rate.
From time to time, the Company will change pension and retiree health and welfare assumptions in response to current conditions and expected future experience. Significant assumptions for the past three years are as follows: