close
Edit Metric
Company
Value
Source
Source URL
Notes
Cancel
 
close
Edit  |  History
Details
Company:
Value :
Source:
Source URL:
Notes:
 
Feedback
Get involved
FAQ

CNX Gas Corporation (NYSE:CXG) is a vertically integrated natural gas producer. Its main revenue stream comes from the sale of self mined natural gas to energy generators and wholesalers such as BP and ConocoPhillips. CXG extracts this natural gas from land that it owns, processes it for sale, and then ships it to customers using its transport network of pipelines. CNX Gas Corp is the 44th largest U.S. natural gas company by production volume.[1] The stock has nearly doubled since its IPO on January 26, 2006. This is directly attributable to the run up in natural gas prices. The price of this commodity has appreciated even more than crude oil in 2008.

The company was originally a subsidiary of CONSOL Energy (CNX), but was spun off in a public offering in 2005. CNX Gas was founded to extract coalbed methane from CONSOL's longwall coal mines. This relationship is still very strong today as 27% of CXG's production is in connection with CONSOL. [2] This is beneficial for CXG because CONSOL has already discovered the proven reserves and CXG saves money on exploration costs. CONSOL still retains an 81.5% stake in the company. Recently, CONSOL made public its intentions to buy back the remaining public shares in a stock-for-stock swap. It is doing so because it believes that the market is not valuing CXG properly.[3] CXG shareholders have resisted the buyout, and threatened to lawsuits against CONSOL should they continue the buyout. On March 25, CONSOL formally terminated the buyout offer.

Contents

[edit] Business Financials

[edit] CXG Income Statement Analysis

Financial Data (in $ Millions, except EPS)
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
Revenue 215.4 397.5 613.4 513.9 477.3
Gross Profit 137.0 183.7 220.8 310.3 323.0
Operating Income 80.0 132.7 166.7 256.4 220.2
Diluted Earnings/Share 0.32 0.66 0.76 1.06 0.90
Operating Margin 37.1% 33.4% 27.2% 50.0% 46.1%

Upon first glance, this income statement may be slightly confusing. This occurs especially when looking at the 2005 numbers. I have highlighted gross profit (sales - cost of goods sold) because it shows a clearer picture of the company's 'core' operations. There is also a corresponding linear increase in the net cash provided by operating activities. Below, I have further examined these 'core' operations:

Comparison of Sales/Extraordinary Income (in $ Millions)
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
Sales from Gas Production [4] 212.9 278.6 328.4 444.6 463.0
Extraordinary Income [5] 3.5 118.9 285.0 69.3 14.3
  • Sales from Gas Production - This includes outside sales to wholesalers, related party sales to affiliates and CONSOL, and master limited partnership royalty income. This is the 'core' of CXG's operations, and the healthy growth observed here shows that lower 2007 operating income does not translate into slowing operations. Additionally, the price of natural gas decreased in real terms from 2006 to 2007. This increase in sales shows CXG's growth potential despite a lackluster year for gas prices.
  • Extraordinary Income - This is the source of the skewing of CXG's financial results. This grouping includes income from derivative investments, hedging activity, and a variety of insurance measures. Included in these numbers is also purchased gas sales, which is when CXG purchases natural gas from another company and then sells it on the market. When this gas is purchased at a dip and then sold at a higher price, as was the case in 2005, it yields a tremendous windfall.

[edit] Natural Gas Sector Trends

Production Data all in Billions Cubic Feed
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
Domestic Production[6] 19,974 19,517 18,927 19,382 20,151
Yearly Growth (-2.3%) (-3.0%) 2.4% 4.0%
Total Production[7][8] 23,918 23,776 23,268 23,568 24,753
Yearly Growth (-0.6%) (-2.1%) 1.3% 5.0%
CXG Production[9] 44.4 48.6 48.4 56.1 58.2
CXG Yearly Growth 9.2% (-0.4%) 16.0% .3.8%.

After examining these U.S. production numbers, we can see that natural gas has moved back in to a growth stage of production. During this time, CXG's annual production has outpaced both domestic and total production. In 2007, this was not the case. CXG trailed both measures in terms of production growth. With the current pricing environment and growth of production, CXG could be increasing production and the strong balance sheet could easily support it. I will revisit this situation later in the balance sheet analysis section.

[edit] Key Trends and Forces

[edit] Continued Global Growth

World economic growth is at an all time high. A byproduct of this growth is a large spike in energy demand. As this increase in demand of the past few years has driven Oil Prices to record highs, the spot and futures market prices for natural gas have followed. This is mainly due to the growing demand for electricity. As described below, natural gas is most dependent on this sector to maintain demand. As more developing nations are industrialized and developed at the current breakneck rates, more power plants and factories will consume natural gas. China is now a net importer for coal, and has begun to work on using alternative fuels to power its rapidly developing electricity grid.

[edit] Oil Demand/Price Inflation

Although the pricing patterns of oil and gas commodities are similar, they are not as linked as some may think. Because the end use distribution of the two is so different, the prices may deviate a great deal. Nearly 2/3 of the petroleum distillates end up in automobiles.[10] Thus, the demand environment is much different. Because so much of the demand for oil comes from transportation, natural gas often has a reactive pricing environment. IE- When oil becomes expensive in the summer because of increases in auto travel demand, natural gas looks cheap to the industrial sector. Although traditionally the price relationship is 6:1 in crude oil's favor, it has widened to nearly 10:1. This 6:1 ratio is derived from the heat content of each commodity. One barrel of crude oil generates approximately 6 times as many BTU of heat as a Million cubic feet of natural gas.[11] But as described above, the demand for each goes beyond just heat generation and their prices can deviate a great deal. Although we are at a wide point in the relationship, natural gas prices equaled crude oil's 13 times this decade.[12]

[edit] Demand for Power from Utilities Directly Benefits CXG

Electrical generation is the number one usage of natural gas. The chart below shows that natural gas consumption is at the same level now as it was in 2007.

Natural Gas Consumption by End Usage (Tcf)
2002 2007
Total Consumption 23,007 23,055
Electric Power 24.7% 29.8%
Industrial Use 32.6% 28.8%
Residential Use 21.2% 20.5%
Commercial Use 13.7% 13.0%
Plant, Pipeline, & Distribution 7.7% 7.7%

Despite this flat consumption growth, the end usage shares have changed drastically. Usage for electrical generation has grown and every other form of consumption has fallen. This new makeup of end usage shows the importance of the utility market in the natural gas industry. Forces that greatly affect utility power consumption, such as weather, are the most important to a natural gas company investor. When winters drag on and and cold weather persists into spring, home heating usage increases and so does the demand for natural gas. When a summer is milder than average and air conditioning usage falls, so does the demand for natural gas.

Price to Generate 1 Million BTU of Heat (2/28/08)
Coal Natural Gas Oil
$3.50 $9.20 $16.67[13]

Price efficiency also comes into play. Coal still has significant pricing power over natural gas when it comes to electricity generation. However, increased CO2 fines and environmental regulation will bring the cost of coal up artificially. Carbon Trading markets are also adding to the inherent cost of generating electricity from coal. Additionally, natural gas plants are much easier to fund. JP Morgan, Citigroup, and Morgan Stanley have now enacted a set of "Carbon Principles." What this means is that they give investment priority to clean energy groups (ie- natural gas, solar, wind, etc) and force coal-fired plants to prove that they are decreasing their CO2 emissions.[14] This means that it is easier for a natural gas fired electric plant to receive funding than a coal plant. The more natural gas utilities constructed, the more demand for natural gas, the more sales and profits for CXG and its peers.

[edit] Domestic Industrial Production Growth

Of the 23.1 TrillionCF of natural gas delivered to U.S. consumers in 2007, 28.8% was used in an industrial capacity. Considering that a slightly smaller 24% of oil consumed and a minuscule 7% of coal are used in industrial production, natural gas is more heavily dependent on the United States' manufacturing output.[15] Two major U.S. economic indicators that investors in natural gas companies should keep an eye on are the Index of Industrial Production[16] and the manufacturing portion of the Employment Report[17]. Since both of these have slid considerably over the last 12 months and projections call for further falls, there should be downward pressure on natural gas prices from the industrial sector in the short term. This is one of the major reasons that natural gas has trailed oil and coal's price increases.

[edit] Liquefied Natural Gas Imports

Historical and Projected Natural Gas Imports, courtesy of the EIA
Historical and Projected Natural Gas Imports, courtesy of the EIA

[edit] Effect on U.S. Suppliers like CXG

Just a few short years ago liquid natural gas (LNG) importation was an almost non-existent market. From 2002-2007, LNG imports rose a staggering 237% to 771 BillionCF. Pipeline imports from Canada only increased 11% to 3380 BillionCF in the same period. [18] This represents an increase of LNG from 1.1% to 3.8% of total U.S. marketed supply.[19] Great strides in LNG technology and economies of scale have made the LNG industry much more accessible to both sides of the market. As the chart to the right illustrates, the U.S. Energy Information Administration expects LNG imports to surpass Canada pipeline imports by 2015.[20] As Canada's natural gas reserves continue to be depleted, this market will become an even larger player in the U.S. natural gas industry. The ease and efficiency at which these LNG imports can enter the U.S. market will prevent significant realized price appreciation by U.S. based suppliers.

[edit] Global Trade and Current Market Conditions

There are two significant pressures that are keeping the price of natural gas at its slow upward march. The significant increase in U.S. natural gas exploration and production is keeping the price from moving up toward global averages which are 20-30% the U.S. spot price. The massive migration of LNG imports towards more demand driven markets in the Eastern Hemisphere is keeping the price from moving down to much lower historical averages dictated by domestic supply level growth. Despite the fact that current LNG prices and economies of scale are making importation much more feasible for buyers and suppliers, increased demand from nations such as Japan and India is causing the level of U.S. LNG imports to fall year over year. At current rates, the U.S. will import 3.4% less LNG than it did in 2007.[21] This decrease in imports comes somewhat counterintuitively with a 6.6% increase in U.S. based production.[22] This illustrates that despite the fact that prices and demand are increasing in the U.S. market, LNG imports are moving instead to foreign markets with higher local prices.


Informative article on the inefficiencies of the global LNG trade in the Wall Street Journal[23]

[edit] Competition

[edit] Balance Sheet/Assets

CNX Gas's balance sheet has very little net debt (interest bearing debt applied against cash on hand) relative to its peers. Its $35.7 million of net debt represents only 7% of its equity. Considering the oil & gas sector's average is 73%, CXG has positioned itself well for growth without taking on significant debt. Although corporate valuation theory would suggest that they are incredibly under-leveraged, this is not necessarily a bad problem to have in the face or a recession and falling energy demand.

Comparison of Balance Sheets (FY 07)
MarketCap (3/3) Net Debt Debt/Equity Return On Assets Return On Equity
Questar Corp 9,840 1,370 0.54 9.56% 21.22%
Range Resources 9,230 1,150 0.66 5.96% 11.19%
CNX Gas Corp 5,560 36 0.07 10.76% 14.26%
Quicksilver Resources 5,520 786 0.76 6.38% 58.32%
Cabot Oil&Gas 4,910 350 0.33 8.08% 16.61%

[edit] Reserves

The cause behind the lack of leverage on CXG's equity may lie in the substantial reserves that CXG already has in its possession. Since CXG already has massive reserves at its disposal, it does need to take on debt to purchase more land or resources. It can determine its own growth rate through increasing production/extraction.

Reserves/Production Comparison in Bcfe (FY 07)
MarketCap (3/3) Estimated Proved Reserves Developed Reserves Production Developed/Estimated Reserves Production/Estimated Reserves
Questar Corp 9,840 1,669 987 121.9 59.2% 7.3%
Range Resources 9,230 1,833 1,145 89.6 62.5% 4.9%
CNX Gas Corp 5,560 1,340 668 57.9 49.8% 4.3%
Quicksilver Resources 5,520 662 380 38.9 57.4% 5.9%
Cabot Oil&Gas 4,910 1,616 1,176 85.5 72.8% 5.3%


However, it is clear when we look at some secondary calculations in regard to CXG's production numbers that they could benefit from growth in operations. Their developed/estimated reserves ratio is the lowest in this peer group. This suggests that they could take on more debt to bring more of their assets into the operational phase. CXG's production as a share of estimated reserves is also the lowest. This suggests that despite their large potential, CXG may not be leveraging their operations enough. With natural gas prices at their highest in years, and futures activity suggesting that they will increase by 15% in the next twelve months,[24] CXG should be ramping up operations and growth to take advantage of the pricing environment. CXG, unlike their competitors, has such a strong balance sheet that they can take on major debt at current low market interest rates.



 CNX Gas
closeMetrics
    Cancel
     
    closeCompanies
      Cancel
       
      Most Recent Data Available

      [edit] Notes

      1. U.S. Energy Information Administration Annual Report, page 10
      2. 2007 CNX Gas Corp Annual Report, page 31
      3. http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=66439&p=irol-newsArticle&ID=1101131&highlight=
      4. CXG 10-K, page 34
      5. CXG 10-K, page 34
      6. U.S. Energy Information Administration, Annual Marketed Production, Bcf
      7. Domestic + All Imported Natural Gas
      8. U.S. Energy Information Administration
      9. CXG 2005 & 2007 10-K
      10. U.S. EIA, Energy Breakdown for 2006
      11. http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2005893/posts
      12. http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2005893/posts
      13. Price data from www.bloomberg.com and http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/coal/page/coalnews/coalmar.html
      14. JP Morgan Press Release
      15. U.S. Energy Information Administration, 2007 Annual Coal Report
      16. www.investopedia.com
      17. www.bls.gov
      18. U.S. Energy Information Administration
      19. U.S. Energy Information Administration
      20. U.S. Energy Information Administration, Natural Gas Outlook
      21. U.S. Energy Information Administration
      22. U.S. Energy Information Administration
      23. Wall Street Journal Online
      24. NYMEX Futures Interests
      25. COG, 10K of 2006, Item 8, Page 59
      26. COG, 10K of 2006, Item 1, Page 9
      27. COG, 10K of 2006, Item 7, Page 46
      28. COG, 10K of 2006, Item 1, Page 14
      29. COG, 10K of 2006, Item 7, Page 44
      30. CXG 10K, 2007
      31. CXG 10K, 2007
      32. STR, 10k for 2007, Item 8 pg 43
      33. STR, 10k for 2007, Item 2 pg 17
      34. 34.0 34.1 STR, 10k for 2007, Item 2 pg 18
      35. STR, 10k for 2007, Item 2 pg 18
      36. KWK, 10K for 2006, Item 8, Page 57
      37. KWK, 10K for 2006, Item 2, Page 23
      38. 38.0 38.1 KWK, 10K for 2006, Item 2, Page 25
      39. KWK, 10K for 2006, Item 2, Page 27
      40. RRC, 10K for 2006, Item 15, Page F-6
      41. RRC, 10K for 2006, Item 2, Page 15
      42. 42.0 42.1 RRC, 10K for 2006, Item 7, Page 24
      43. RRC, 10K for 2006, Item 2, Page 17


      The Shelf
      Contributions
      Help make Wikinvest better! Learn how to get involved. And create an account to build your reputation.
      Did you know…?
      Bookmarks
      Worried about pump and dump?
      We review changes
      for stock spam
      Want to make Wikinvest better?
      We need your help,
      contribute today
      Do you write software?
      We are recruiting
      the best engineers
      Like Wikinvest?
      Spread the word —
      Tell your friends!
      Wikinvest © 2006, 2007, 2008. Use of this site is subject to express Terms of Service, Privacy Policy, and Disclaimer. By continuing past this page, you agree to abide by these terms. Any information provided by Wikinvest, including but not limited to company data, competitors, business analysis, market share, sales revenues and other operating metrics, earnings call analysis, conference call transcripts, industry information, or price targets should not be construed as research, trading tips or recommendations, or investment advice and is provided with no warrants as to its accuracy. Stock market data, including US and International equity symbols, stock quotes, share prices, earnings ratios, and other fundamental data is provided by data partners. Stock market quotes delayed at least 15 minutes for NASDAQ, 20 mins for NYSE and AMEX. See data providers for more details. Company names, products, services and branding cited herein may be trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners. The use of trademarks or service marks of another is not a representation that the other is affiliated with, sponsors, is sponsored by, endorses, or is endorsed by Wikinvest.
      Powered by MediaWiki