CVS » Topics » 3. Long-Term Incentive Compensation

This excerpt taken from the CVS DEF 14A filed Mar 24, 2009.

3. Long-Term Incentive Compensation

The Committee believes strongly in the use of long-term incentive compensation for executives to reinforce four strategic objectives:

 

  n to focus on the importance of returns to stockholders;

 

  n to promote the achievement of long-term performance goals;

 

  n to encourage executive retention; and

 

  n to promote meaningful levels of Company stock ownership by executives.

The Committee has developed a multi-faceted integrated long-term incentive approach to achieve these strategic objectives. The key elements of this approach are an annual stock option grant, which serves to align the interests of executives with those of CVS Caremark’s stockholders; an annual restricted stock unit award, which vests contingent upon significant continued employment with the Company; and the LTIP, which rewards multi-year financial success and is paid equally in cash and Company common stock. The Committee believes that this three-pillar structure properly balances both the incentive required to drive achievement of the four strategic objectives noted above as well as the amount and timing of the rewards delivered for successful achievement of those objectives. All three of these long-term incentive compensation elements are delivered under the provisions of the stockholder-approved 1997 Incentive Compensation Plan (“1997 ICP”).

To determine the overall opportunity and appropriate proportions of the components, the Committee considered a variety of factors, including competitive market positioning against comparable executives in CVS Caremark’s peer group, potential economic value realized, timing of vesting, and taxation. All of these factors were considered within the context of the challenges presented by the strategic, financial and operating goals established for CVS Caremark by the full Board for both 2008 and the longer-term. In the first quarter of 2008, the Committee reviewed survey data compiled and analyzed by the external compensation consultant on total compensation packages and the value of long-term incentive awards at organizations within the Company’s peer group. The Committee also considered, except in the case of the award to the CEO, the recommendations of the CEO for each of the executive officers. In conjunction with the external market review, the Committee considered the potential effectiveness of the retentive value of the outstanding equity and other arrangements currently in place for the executive team to determine whether additional awards to secure continued employment with the Company were warranted.

The Committee considered the impact of the equity component of the long-term compensation programs on shares outstanding and the calculation of the Company’s “burn rate”, or share utilization for compensation purposes. Each of the three components of the CVS Caremark long-term executive compensation structure has a separate and distinct impact on the Company’s outstanding shares. The Committee considered these impacts, both individually and in the aggregate, in its determination of the appropriate relative levels of each component within the overall award opportunity. Restricted stock units dilute the outstanding shares when they vest regardless of the market price of the Company’s common stock. Since stock options become dilutive only if they are “in the money,” and their accounting cost is lower than that of the restricted stock units, each option is considered by the Committee to have potentially

 

21


Table of Contents

less of an impact on earnings per share. To determine the overall impact of the awards and anticipate share utilization, after consultation with its external compensation consultant, consistent with the practices of at least one institutional stockholder advisory service, and considering the Company’s accounting cost for options, the Committee assumed that one restricted stock unit equals four stock options.

The Committee established the vesting periods for restricted stock unit and stock option grants with the objective of maximizing executive retention and providing a competitively designed equity program. It also reaffirmed the three-year performance cycle of the LTIP as the appropriate interval to establish and measure achievement of a long-term financial goal as it is consistent with the Company’s strategic long-term planning cycle. The Committee was also mindful of the need to stagger these vesting and performance cycle dates to ensure the release of various awards over a period of successive years.

In February 2008, the Committee concluded its comprehensive assessment of the competitive landscape, the impact on shares outstanding and the timing and potential economic impact offered by the future vesting of restricted stock unit grants and the vesting and exercise of stock option grants. Several guiding principles emerged from this assessment:

(1) each of the three components (stock option grant, restricted stock unit grant, and the LTIP) will have a material role in the delivery of long-term compensation;

(2) the combination of the target opportunity for the three components will represent the majority of the target total direct compensation opportunity for each executive officer and generally will be at least 60% of the total direct compensation opportunity;

(3) each of the three components will be earned independently, i.e., successful achievement of the three-year financial goal established for the LTIP will not trigger or accelerate vesting of the restricted stock unit or stock option grants; conversely, any awards payable under the LTIP will be based solely on results as measured against the relevant performance metric and not affected by any value realized by the restricted stock unit or stock option grants;

(4) for the CEO, each component of the target long-term opportunity will have approximately equal weight;

(5) the combination of restricted stock units awarded through the annual grant plus the shares delivered through the LTIP will equal approximately one-half of the total long-term opportunity for the CEO and business segment presidents and one-third for other executive officers; and

(6) 50% of the LTIP will continue to be paid in cash due to the executives’ needs for current cash to meet tax obligations occasioned on the settlement of restricted stock unit awards, but the target cash component of the long-term incentive compensation component will not exceed 25% of the total target long-term compensation.

 

22


Table of Contents

To determine the target proportions of each long-term compensation component for 2008, the Committee applied the principles described above, incorporated its assessment of competitive positioning and dilutive impact on shares outstanding and determined the following allocations:

 

      % of Overall Target Long-Term
Opportunity
Executive    LTIP    Stock Option
Grant
   Stock
Grant

Thomas M. Ryan

   32%    34%    34%

David B. Rickard

   40%    45%    15%

Chris W. Bodine

   42%    29%    29%

Howard A. McLure

   38%    31%    31%

Larry J. Merlo

   38%    31%    31%

Douglas A. Sgarro

   38%    47%    15%

The annual cycle for setting goals, establishing award opportunities, assessing performance and determining final awards for the long-term incentive compensation plans parallels that of the annual incentive plan. As described above, the Committee sets a range of long-term award opportunity for each of the executive officers for each of the three components of long-term compensation: the LTIP, stock options, and restricted stock units. A more detailed overview of each of the three components is presented below.

The Committee conducted a final review of the total equity-denominated awards that are included in the target compensation opportunities for the executive officers in the context of the Company’s overall equity compensation program. It reviewed estimates of stock option and restricted stock unit awards to be made to CVS Caremark officers and other employees during the balance of fiscal 2008 against the Company’s desired burn rate of less than 1.5% and the reserve of shares established under the 1997 ICP. The Committee determined that it could make the proposed awards to the executive officers and the projected additional awards to other employees and still remain within the Company’s targeted burn rate.

Following is an overview and the 2008 results for each of the components of CVS Caremark’s long-term incentive compensation.

This excerpt taken from the CVS DEF 14A filed Mar 28, 2008.

3. Long-Term Incentive Compensation

The Committee believes strongly in the use of long-term incentive compensation for executives to reinforce four strategic objectives:

 

  n to focus on the importance of returns to stockholders;

 

  n to promote the achievement of long-term performance goals;

 

23


Table of Contents
  n to encourage executive retention; and

 

  n to promote meaningful levels of Company stock ownership by executives.

The Committee has developed a multi-faceted integrated long-term incentive approach to achieve these strategic objectives. The key elements of this approach are an annual stock option grant, which serves to align the interests of executives with those of CVS Caremark’s stockholders; an annual restricted stock unit award, which vests contingent upon significant continued employment with the Company; and the LTIP, which rewards multi-year financial success and is paid equally in cash and Company common stock. The Committee believes that this three-pillar structure properly balances both the incentive required to drive achievement of the four strategic objectives noted above as well as the amount and timing of the rewards delivered for successful achievement of those objectives. All three of these long-term incentive compensation elements are delivered under the provisions of the stockholder-approved 1997 ICP.

To determine the overall opportunity and appropriate proportions of the components, the Committee considered a variety of factors, including competitive market positioning against comparable executives in CVS Caremark’s peer group, potential economic value realized, timing of vesting, and taxation. All of these factors were considered within the context of the challenges presented by the strategic, financial and operating goals established for CVS Caremark by the full Board for both 2007 and the longer-term. In the first quarter of 2007, the Committee reviewed survey data compiled and analyzed by the external compensation consultant on total compensation packages and the value of long-term incentive awards at organizations within the Company’s peer group. The Committee also considered, except in the case of the award to the CEO, the recommendations of the CEO for each of the executive officers. In conjunction with the external market review, the Committee considered the potential effectiveness of the retentive value of the outstanding equity and other arrangements currently in place for the executive team to determine whether additional awards to secure continued employment with the Company were warranted.

The Committee considered the impact of the equity component of the long-term compensation programs on shares outstanding and the calculation of the Company’s “burn rate”, or share utilization for compensation purposes. Each of the three components of the CVS Caremark long-term executive compensation structure has a separate and distinct impact on the Company’s outstanding shares. The Committee considered these impacts, both individually and in the aggregate, in its determination of the appropriate relative levels of each component within the overall award opportunity. Restricted stock units dilute the outstanding shares when they vest regardless of the market price of the Company’s common stock. Since stock options become dilutive only if they are “in the money,” and their accounting cost is lower than that of the restricted stock units, each option is considered by the Committee to have potentially less of an impact on earnings per share. To determine the overall impact of the awards and anticipate share utilization, after consultation with its external compensation consultant, consistent with the practices of at least one institutional shareholder advisory service, and considering the Company’s accounting cost for options, the Committee assumed that one restricted stock unit equals four stock options.

The Committee established the vesting periods for restricted stock unit and stock option grants with the objective of maximizing executive retention and providing a competitively designed equity program. It also reaffirmed the three-year performance cycle of the LTIP as the appropriate interval to establish and measure achievement of a long-term financial goal as it is consistent with the Company’s strategic long-term planning cycle. The Committee was also mindful of the need to stagger these vesting and performance cycle dates to ensure the release of various rewards over a period of successive years.

In February 2007, the Committee concluded its comprehensive assessment of the competitive landscape, the impact on shares outstanding and the timing and potential economic impact offered by the future vesting of restricted stock unit grants and the vesting and exercise of stock option grants. Several guiding principles emerged from this assessment:

(1) each of the three components (stock option grant, restricted stock unit grant, and the LTIP) will have a material role in the delivery of long-term compensation;

 

24


Table of Contents

(2) the combination of the target opportunity for the three components will represent the majority of the target total direct compensation opportunity for each executive officer and generally will be at least 60% of the total direct compensation opportunity;

(3) each of the three components will be earned independently, i.e., successful achievement of the three-year financial goal established for the LTIP will not trigger or accelerate vesting of the restricted stock unit or stock option grants; conversely, any awards payable under the LTIP will be based solely on results as measured against the relevant performance metric and not affected by any value realized by the restricted stock unit or stock option grants;

(4) for the CEO, each component of the target long-term opportunity will have approximately equal weight;

(5) the combination of restricted stock units awarded through the annual grant plus the shares delivered through the LTIP will equal approximately one-third (one-half for the CEO) of the total long-term opportunity; and

(6) 50% of the LTIP will continue to be paid in cash due to the executives’ needs for current cash to meet tax obligations occasioned on the settlement of restricted stock unit awards, but the target cash component of the long-term incentive compensation component will not exceed 25% of the total target long-term compensation.

To determine the target proportions of each long-term compensation component for 2007, the Committee applied the principles described above, incorporated its assessment of competitive positioning and dilutive impact on shares outstanding and determined the following allocations:

 

     

% of Overall Target Long-Term

Opportunity (“LTO”)

Executive    Total
LTIP
   Stock Option
Grant
   Stock
Grant

Thomas M. Ryan

   36%    32%    32%

David B. Rickard

   40%    45%    15%

Chris W. Bodine

   41%    44%    15%

Howard A. McLure

   41%    44%    15%

Larry J. Merlo

   41%    44%    15%

Douglas A. Sgarro

   38%    47%    15%

The annual cycle for setting goals, establishing award opportunities, assessing performance and determining final awards for the long-term incentive compensation plans parallels that of the annual incentive plan. As described above, the Committee sets a range of long-term award opportunity for each of the executive officers for each of the three components of long-term compensation: the LTIP, stock options, and restricted stock units. A more detailed overview of each of the three components is presented below.

The Committee conducted a final review of the total equity-denominated awards that are included in the target compensation opportunities for the executive officers in the context of the Company’s overall equity compensation program. It reviewed estimates of stock option and restricted stock unit awards to be made to CVS Caremark officers and other employees during the balance of fiscal 2007 against the Company’s desired burn rate of less than 1.5% and the reserve of shares established under the 1997 ICP. The Committee determined that it could make the proposed awards to the executive officers and the projected additional awards to other employees and still remain within the Company’s targeted burn rate.

 

25


Table of Contents

Following is an overview and the 2007 results for each of the components of CVS Caremark’s long-term incentive compensation.

This excerpt taken from the CVS DEF 14A filed Mar 24, 2006.

Long-Term Incentive Compensation

 

The Committee believes strongly in the use of long-term incentive compensation for executives to reinforce four strategic objectives: to focus on the importance of returns to stockholders, to promote the achievement of long-term performance goals, to encourage executive retention, and to promote meaningful levels of Company stock ownership by executives. The Committee has developed an integrated long-term incentive approach utilizing both equity and cash to achieve these strategic objectives. The key elements of this approach are: an annual stock option grant, which serves to align the interests of executives with those of CVS’ stockholders; a restricted stock unit award, which vests contingent upon significant continued employment with the Company; and the Long-Term Performance Share Plan, which rewards multi-year financial success.

 

This excerpt taken from the CVS DEF 14A filed Mar 25, 2005.

Long-Term Incentive Compensation

 

The Committee believes strongly in the use of long-term incentive compensation for executives to reinforce four strategic objectives: to focus on the importance of returns to stockholders, to promote the achievement of long-term performance goals, to encourage executive retention, and to promote meaningful levels of Company stock ownership by executives. The Committee has developed an integrated long-term incentive approach utilizing both equity and cash to achieve these strategic objectives. The key elements of this approach are an annual stock option grant, which serves to align the interests of executives with those of CVS’ stockholders, a restricted stock unit award, which vests contingent upon significant continued employment with the Company, and the Long-Term Performance Share Plan, which rewards multi-year financial success.

 

13


Table of Contents
Wikinvest © 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012. Use of this site is subject to express Terms of Service, Privacy Policy, and Disclaimer. By continuing past this page, you agree to abide by these terms. Any information provided by Wikinvest, including but not limited to company data, competitors, business analysis, market share, sales revenues and other operating metrics, earnings call analysis, conference call transcripts, industry information, or price targets should not be construed as research, trading tips or recommendations, or investment advice and is provided with no warrants as to its accuracy. Stock market data, including US and International equity symbols, stock quotes, share prices, earnings ratios, and other fundamental data is provided by data partners. Stock market quotes delayed at least 15 minutes for NASDAQ, 20 mins for NYSE and AMEX. Market data by Xignite. See data providers for more details. Company names, products, services and branding cited herein may be trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners. The use of trademarks or service marks of another is not a representation that the other is affiliated with, sponsors, is sponsored by, endorses, or is endorsed by Wikinvest.
Powered by MediaWiki