CVS » Topics » Statement of CVS Board Recommending a Vote AGAINST the Central Laborers Proposal

This excerpt taken from the CVS DEF 14A filed Mar 25, 2005.

Statement of CVS’ Board Recommending a Vote AGAINST the Central Laborers’ Proposal

 

CVS’ Board of Directors unanimously recommends that you vote against the Central Laborers’ Proposal because it is unnecessary and it is not in the best interests of CVS or its stockholders.

 

28


Table of Contents

CVS has already adopted and implemented the Long-Term Performance Share Plan (the “LTP Share Plan”), a share grant program for senior executives that includes the features described in the Central Laborers’ Proposal. The LTP Share Plan is intended to encourage executives to balance short-term goals with long-term profit financial progress, while simultaneously promoting executive retention. Awards under the LTP Share Plan are granted by the Management Planning and Development Committee (the “Committee”), which is comprised entirely of independent directors.

 

The first feature of the Central Laborers’ Proposal is that the restricted share plan “utilize justifiable performance criteria combined with challenging benchmarks for each criteria utilized.” As described on page 14 of this proxy statement, grants of awards under the LTP Share Plan have been based on CVS’ performance relative to annual return on invested capital (“ROIC”) over a three-year performance cycle, although the Committee may use any of the other performance criteria set forth in the 1997 Incentive Compensation Plan approved by CVS’ stockholders. At the beginning of each cycle, senior executives are given the opportunity to earn a target dollar value, payable in cash and CVS common stock. At the end of each cycle, the actual dollar value awarded may be higher or lower than the target number, depending on CVS’ performance relative to ROIC.

 

The Central Laborers’ Proposal further states that “clear disclosure should be provided on the performance benchmarks associated with each performance criteria to the extent this information can be provided without revealing proprietary information.” As permitted by SEC rules, CVS does not disclose performance benchmarks, as CVS considers such benchmarks to be confidential commercial or business information, the disclosure of which would adversely affect its competitive position. As such, performance benchmarks would not be required to be disclosed under the Central Laborers’ Proposal.

 

The second feature of the Central Laborers’ Proposal is that the restricted share plan include “a time-based vesting requirement of at least three years.” The LTP Share Plan consists of three-year performance cycles, with a new cycle commencing each year. Awards under the LTP Share Plan are essentially subject to a vesting period, substantively the same as the three-year restriction suggested by the Central Laborers’ Proposal, given that the performance targets are based on a three-year cycle. Accordingly, a senior executive is restricted from full enjoyment of any awards until the three-year performance cycle has ended.

 

In any event, it is critical that the Committee have full flexibility in designing the overall compensation program, including equity incentive compensation, for our officers and employees. The Committee reviews the composition of executive officer equity compensation on an ongoing basis and utilizes an independent compensation consulting firm, as necessary, to assist in formulating fair and competitive equity compensation programs that closely align the interests of executive officers with stockholders’ interests and enhance CVS’ high-growth strategy. This includes comparing compensation programs to a core peer group of companies, as well as general industry standards. By seeking to limit the Committee’s flexibility in regard to designing and implementing compensation programs in ways it deems appropriate, the Central Laborers’ Proposal would put us at a competitive disadvantage and would hinder CVS’ ability to attract, retain and motivate the highest caliber executive officers in a competitive environment.

 

The Board of Directors recommends a vote AGAINST the Central Laborers’ Proposal.

 

29


Table of Contents
Wikinvest © 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012. Use of this site is subject to express Terms of Service, Privacy Policy, and Disclaimer. By continuing past this page, you agree to abide by these terms. Any information provided by Wikinvest, including but not limited to company data, competitors, business analysis, market share, sales revenues and other operating metrics, earnings call analysis, conference call transcripts, industry information, or price targets should not be construed as research, trading tips or recommendations, or investment advice and is provided with no warrants as to its accuracy. Stock market data, including US and International equity symbols, stock quotes, share prices, earnings ratios, and other fundamental data is provided by data partners. Stock market quotes delayed at least 15 minutes for NASDAQ, 20 mins for NYSE and AMEX. Market data by Xignite. See data providers for more details. Company names, products, services and branding cited herein may be trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners. The use of trademarks or service marks of another is not a representation that the other is affiliated with, sponsors, is sponsored by, endorses, or is endorsed by Wikinvest.
Powered by MediaWiki