




Suggest other news sources for this topic

WIKI ANALYSIS
|
Cameco (NYSE:CCJ) is the world's largest producer of U3O8 uranium, a mineral whose only commercial use is to fuel nuclear power plants. Nuclear power accounts for about 15% of the world's electricity, and Cameco accounts for 20% of world uranium production, with 500 million pounds of proven and probable reserves.[1] It is involved in all stages of the uranium mining process, which includes exploration, fuel fabrication, and electricity generation (the latter through Bruce Power, a partnership with British Energy (LON:BGY)). As one of only three conversion suppliers in the western world, Cameco controls about 40% of the western world's capacity to produce uranium hexaflouride (UF6), a compound used in the uranium enrichment process that produces fuel for nuclear reactors.[2]
Every year since 1985, the world's consumption of uranium has been greater than its production.[3] As one of the most economical sources of energy on a per unit basis, nuclear energy is an attractive alternative to fossil fuels. Cameco stands to benefit from the excess demand for uranium, especially as economic growth in the developing world continues to contribute to the rising demand for energy.
In the U.S., however, government funding for renewable energy other than nuclear energy, such as wind, hydroelectric energy, and solar energy, makes it difficult for new nuclear power plants to be installed. In fact, the last commercial nuclear power plant to be installed in the U.S. was the Watts Bar Nuclear Generating Station in 1996.[4] Though nuclear power plant installations have stalled in the U.S., other countries are rapidly installing nuclear plants. China, India, South Korea, Russia, and several European countries have plans to install nuclear plants and to increase the percentage of energy provided by nuclear energy. Cameco will benefit from new nuclear plant installations as utility operators demand more uranium to run nuclear reactors.
Company Overview The major stages in the production of nuclear fuel are uranium exploration, mining and milling, refining and conversion, enrichment and fuel fabrication. When uranium deposits are discovered, ore is extracted and processed at a mill to produce uranium concentrates. Cameco operates uranium mines and enrichment/fabrication plants that sell uranium concentrates to utility companies that generate nuclear electricity.[5]
Business and Financial MetricsThird Quarter 2009 Summary Cameco reported net earnings of $172 million in the third quarter, up $37 million from $135 million in the third quarter of 2008.[6] Cameco underperformed analysts' estimates with earnings of 26 cents a share, which trailed the 33-cent average analyst estimate. Cameco increased its purchases of uranium for trading purposes in 2009, boosting its costs. Cameco's sales of uranium declined by 15 percent and the realized price of uranium fell by 9.6 percent in 2009.
| Cameco (CCJ) | 2008[7] | 2007[7] | 2008/2007 % change |
| Revenue (millions $Cdn) from uranium | 1,512 | 1,269 | 19.1% |
| Average realized price of uranium ($Cdn/lb) | 43.91 | 41.68 | 5.4% |
| Uranium sales volume (million lbs) | 34.1 | 30.2 | 12.9% |
| Uranium production volume (million lbs) | 17.0 | 19.8 | (14.1)% |
| Revenue from gold (million $US) | 677 | 405 | 67.2% |
| Realized price of gold ($US/ounce) | 853 | 691 | 23.4% |
| Gold sales volume (ounces) | 746,000 | 541,000 | 37.9% |
| Gold production (ounces) | 749,000 | 555,000 | 35.0% |
Business SegmentsCameco is one of the world’s largest uranium producers, accounting for approximately 20% of the world’s production in 2008 with about 500 million pounds of proven and probable mineral reserves of uranium.[1] Cameco operates four uranium mines located in Canada and the United States and has two mines under development in Canada and Kazakhstan.[5]
Cameco has a 52.7% interest in Centerra Gold Inc. Centerra is a Canadian gold producer that acquires and develops gold properties in Central Asia and Eastern Europe.[9] Centerra operates two gold mines in the Kyrgyz Republic and Mongolia.[9] As of December 2009, Cameco completely divested its interest in Centerra Gold.
Cameco has a 31.6% interest in Bruce Power L.P. (BPLP), which operates four Bruce B nuclear reactors in Ontario, Canada.[9] Cameco provides 100% of the uranium concentrates for BPLP.[9] Cameco also supplies BPLP and Bruce Power A Limited Partnership (BALP) with all of their fuel conversion and fabrication services.[9] BPLP’s four B reactors have a combined net generation capacity of about 3,260 megawatts (MW), supplying about 15% of Ontario’s electricity.[5]
The fuel services segment involves the refining, conversion, and fabrication of uranium concentrate. Cameco operates refining facilities at Blind River, Canada, and conversion and fuel manufacturing facilities in Ontario, Canada.[9] The Blind River facility refines uranium concentrates into uranium trioxide (UO3), an intermediate product in the uranium conversion process.[9] At its Port Hope conversion facility, Cameco converts the UO3 to either uranium hexafluoride (UF6) or uranium dioxide (UO2). Cameco manufactures fuel bundles for use in Candu nuclear reactors.[9]
Acquisitions and DivestituresCameco announced a public offering of 88,618,472 common shares of Centerra Gold for net proceeds of approximately $871 million, effectively disposing of its entire interest in Centerra Gold Inc (CG).[10] Without a stake in Centerra, Cameco's earnings will drop by 20% in 2010. As a result, analysts believe that Cameco will use the proceeds of the Centerra divestiture to fund an acquisition of another energy company.
Cameco will use the proceeds from the sale of Centerra Gold to finish developing its Cigar Lake project in northern Saskatchewan and to fund any acquisition activity in 2010. Cameco's goal is to move Cigar Lake into production as part of its target to double uranium production by 2018.[11] The Cigar Lake uranium mine has been flooded for three years, but Cameco reported that it has stopped the inflow of water and is in the process of pumping out the mine, which should take six to 12 months.[11] Once the mine is operating, it is expected to produce 18 million pounds of uranium annually, half of which would belong to Cameco.[11] This would put the company, which is expected to produce 20 million pounds of uranium in 2009, approximately halfway to its goal of doubling production.[11]
In August 2008, Cameco completed the acquisition of a 70% interest in the Kintyre uranium exploration project in Western Australia.[9] A joint venture comprised of Cameco (70%) and Mitsubishi Development Pty Ltd (30%) purchased the Kintyre project from Rio Tinto.[9] Cameco has been actively exploring for uranium deposits in Australia since 1997 and has exploration licenses in Western, Northern, and Southern Australia. Its acquisition of Kintyre has expanded its access to uranium deposits in the region north of Perth, Australia.[12]
Also in 2008, Cameco acquired a 24% interest in Global Laser Enrichment (GLE) based in North Carolina. GLE is focused on developing a uranium enrichment process using laser technology.[9] The remainder of GLE is owned by General Electric Company (51%) and Hitachi Ltd. (25%), and the acquisition is an indication of Cameco's willingness to invest in research and development of new enrichment technologies.[13]
Key Trends and Forces
Demand for uranium outstrips supplyEvery year since 1985, the world's consumption of uranium has been greater than its production.[3] In 2006, uranium producers met only 62% of worldwide demand. To help meet this shortfall, reprocessed uranium and plutonium from the dismantling of Russian and U.S. nuclear weapons has been used.[14] The World Nuclear Association estimates that uranium mining will need to increase by almost 300% in the next two decades.[14] The Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics estimates that uranium prices will rise 22% from $46.4 in 2009 to $56.7 in 2010 due to the widening gap between uranium supply and demand.[15] NYMEX Uranium futures for December 2010 are in the $48.50 range.
In Cameco's uranium business, higher costs of sales adversely affected uranium profits in the second quarter of 2009, increasing by between 5% and 10%.[16] Since Cameco's production levels do not satisfy the demand for uranium, the company must purchase additional uranium from other miners at a significant mark-up. As a result, overall costs of sales are forecast to rise by 20% to 25%.[16]
As of January 2009, there were 436 nuclear reactors operating worldwide and a total of 115 reactors under construction or planned for completion by 2020.[17] The demand for processed uranium continues to rise as countries throughout the world increase their reliance on nuclear energy for electricity:
China and India's Uranium DemandCameco set up a marketing office in India in October 2009 as it expects India's demand for uranium to triple in the next 15 years.[18] Indian reactor demand for uranium was estimated at about 3 million pounds in 2009 and is expected to rise to as much as 10 million pounds in 15 years.[18] India has 17 reactors operating and six under construction, and another 23 reactors are expected to come on line in the next eight years. China has 11 reactors operating, 16 under construction and 35 new plants expected to come on line within the next eight years. China's uranium demand is expected to grow 4-6 times by 2020, as the country increases its annual installed nuclear power capacity to 40 million kilowatts from 9 million present.[19] The sharp increase in the demand for uranium from India and China will continue to raise the price of uranium and increase the profitability of Cameco's uranium sales.
Construction of new nuclear power plants is prohibitively expensiveThough there are plans to install many nuclear power plants worldwide, the cost of plant installation is prohibitive. Nuclear power plants typically have high capital costs for building the plant, but low fuel costs. For example, researchers from the Keystone Center consulted with 27 nuclear power companies and contractors and concluded that the cost of building new reactors is between $3,600 and $4,000 per installed kilowatt.[20] They also projected that the operating costs are 30¢/kilowatt-hour for the first 13 years until construction costs are paid followed by 18¢/kWh over the remaining lifetime of the plant, compared to 10¢/kWh for residential electricity.[20] In real terms, Florida Power & Light estimated the cost for building two new nuclear units at Turkey Point in South Florida to be $24 billion.[20] In addition to high construction costs, nuclear power plants incur large decommissioning and nuclear waste storage costs.
Uranium prices are dictated by long term contractsUranium spot prices have increased dramatically since 2003, when the commodity was under $10 per pound. Its peak spot price in 2007 was over $125 per pound and has since fallen to about $42.50 as of March 2009.[21] Cameco's stock price appreciated nearly 13-fold between January 2003 and June 2007 as a result of this increase in uranium spot prices.[22] Most utility companies secure a significant percent of their uranium fuel through long-term (i.e., multi-year) contracts with companies such as CCJ. These contracts are often priced in accordance to market conditions with uranium spot prices (i.e., short-term purchases for uranium within one year).[5] CCJ benefits from rising uranium spot prices because it earns more revenue for each unit of uranium concentrate it sells to nuclear power plants and electricity producers when the uranium spot price is higher.
Alternative energy competes with nuclear energyWind, hydroelectric energy, and solar energy all compete with nuclear power for a share of the alternative energy market. In 2008, production costs were 8.8 cents (U.S.) per kilowatt hour for nuclear, 7.4 cents (U.S.) for coal, and 10.6 cents (U.S.) for natural gas.[23] Though renewable energy sources will need to become more affordable and more widely adopted in order to become a more serious competitor to uranium, advances in technology are making investment in renewable energy more attractive.
| Fixed Cost (cents/kWh) | Variable Cost (cents/kWh) | Total Cost (cents/kWh) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coal | 4.1 | 3.3 | 7.4 |
| Natural gas | 2.8 | 7.8 | 10.6 |
| Nuclear | 8.0 | 0.8 | 8.8 |
| Wind | 8.2 | 0.0 | 8.2 |
| Energy return on Energy Invested | |
|---|---|
| Coal-fired power plant | 2.5 |
| Nuclear power | 4.5 |
| Hydroelectric power | 10 |
| Wind power | 35 |
| Natural gas | 10.3 |
Legislation restricts the use of nuclear powerNuclear energy and uranium demand are dependent on key legislation issues, including environmental and safety concerns surrounding nuclear power plants as well as electricity deregulation. For example, due to regulatory hurdles, the last commercial nuclear power plant to be installed in the U.S. was the Watts Bar Nuclear Generating Station in 1996.[25] Regulators must approve the construction, continued operation, and decommissioning of most of Cameco’s facilities.[5] These facilities are subject to numerous laws and regulations regarding safety and environmental matters, including the management of hazardous wastes and materials.
Environmental regulation compliance in the U.S. and Canada imposes costsThe world production of uranium in 2005 was approximately 105 million pounds of U3O8, 90% of which came from eight countries, which are, in order of greatest to least production: Canada (30 million pounds, 29% of world production), Australia, Kazakhstan, Niger, Russia, Namibia, Uzbekistan, and the U.S.[1] Increasingly stringent environmental regulations in Canada and the U.S. result in higher administration costs and capital expenditures for compliance. One example of a regulatory challenge that has significantly impacted Cameco's cost structure is the requirement to reduce the concentrations of molybdenum and selenium in the effluent released from a uranium mill in Key Lake, Canada.[5] Total capital expenditures to add the molybdenum and selenium removal circuit totaled $30 million ($Cdn).[5]
Political instability in Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan, boasting one fifth of the world's uranium reserves, is ruled by an autocratic government known for bribery and ranked near the bottom of Transparency International's global corruption index in 2008.[14] Since Kazakhstan gained independence after the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991, Nursultan Nazarbayev, Kazakhstan's leader, has controlled the media through censorship and oppressive media laws. The political situation in Kazakhstan poses risks for Cameco, which has entered into a joint venture with Kazatomprom, Kazakhstan's state-owned nuclear company, to build a 12,000-ton nuclear fuel conversion plant.[14] Cameco and Kazatomprom are already joint owners of the Inkai mine in Kazakhstan, which has faced delays coming to production due to a sulphuric acid shortages in Kazakhstan.[27]
The low cost of uranium production in Kazakhstan and the abundance of uranium deposits make Kazakhstan a leading player in the uranium production market. Kazakhstan in 2007 passed Rio Tinto (RTP) and Areva (ARVCF.PK) as the world's second-largest production company behind Cameco, providing about 5,000 pounds, or 12% of global supply.[14] Given political uncertainties in Kazakhstan, however, Cameco's investments in that country are exposed to some level of risk, especially through its joint ventures with Kazatomprom.
Unionized workers create an environment of workforce instabilityIn September 2009, 137 unionized Cameco workers (organized by the United Steelworkers union) went on strike demanding higher wages.[28] It took four months for the company to settle a deal with the striking workers, which included a three-year deal guaranteeing a five percent wage hike. Cameco's fuel manufacturing business, which employs 370 people in total, is located at sites in Port Hope and Cobourg, Ontario.[28] At Cameco's Cobourg plant, nuclear reactor tubes and component parts are made and in Port Hope the pellets are put into the tubes and made into fuel bundles for nuclear reactors. Most of the striking employees who will be returning to work in January are involved in the production of fuel bundles.[28]
Competition In 2008, Cameco was the largest uranium mining company in Canada and the largest producer of U3O8 uranium in the world, producing 19.8 million pounds of uranium. In 2007, 11 countries were responsible for 97% of the global uranium extraction.
| Comparison to Competitors | Cameco (CCJ) | Rio Tinto (RTP) | BHP Billiton (BHP) | Denison Mines (DNN) |
| Total Revenue (2007)[35] | $2.3B | $29.7B | $47.4B | $76.8M |
| Operating Income (2007)[35] | $472M | $8.6B | $19.7B | $(7.01M) |
| Net Income (2007)[35] | $434M | $7.3B | $13.4B | $35.5M |
| Net Profit Margin (2007)[35] | 18.9% | 10.0% | 20.1% | (65.47)% |
| Uranium production (million lbs U3O8) | 19.8[7] | 9.0[36] | 8.0[37] | 1.7[34] |
| Market Share by Production | Cameco (CCJ) | Rio Tinto (RTP) | BHP Billiton (BHP) | Denison Mines (DNN) | Areva (ARVCF.PK) | Kazatomprom | Other |
| Market Share by Uranium Production (%) | 20%[1] | 13%[29] | 9%[32] | 2%[34] | 12%[31] | 9%[33] | 35% |
References
| Energy Companies Anadarko Petroleum BP ChevronTexaco Arch Coal Cameco ConocoPhillips Enbridge Consolidated Edison Entergy Exelon Exxon Mobil Frontier Oil GE Halliburton Philips Massey Energy Occidental Petroleum PG&E Peabody Energy Shell Sasol Schlumberger Sinopec Suncor Sunoco SunPower Suntech Suzlon Toshiba Valero Xcel |




| ||||||
