CNC » Topics » Kent Cerneka - Centene Corporation - Director, Contracting and Network Development

This excerpt taken from the CNC 8-K filed Oct 3, 2005.

Kent Cerneka - Centene Corporation – Director, Contracting and Network Development

 

Good morning. As Debra said, my name is Kent Cerneka. I’m the director of contracting and network development here at Centene. And I’m going to cover a couple topics to Model One, which has been addressed so far, as well as our processes and controls and standards that we have in place to ensure that completed contracts meet our requirements and can be put into the system effectively and cause claims to pay accurately and timely.

 

We’re going to start with the Model One and we’re going to try to cover, first of all, what is a Model One? How do we manage it - excuse me - with our physician partners? And then finally, what are the benefits to both the doctors and to Centene and our health plans in the Model One? So, initially, it’s a standard risk compensation program for primary care physicians. Effectively - it’s similar to the professional services cap except for the fact that we also share with them on facility or institutional services.

 

It encourages appropriate use of healthcare. What that means is right services, right place, right time. Examples could [include] making sure that your patients get an annual dental exam. Ultimately, that’s going to cause us to spend a lot less money on patients with more significant dental problems down the road. Another example might be I need to obtain an MRI for a particular patient. Well, that MRI might be available for $500 at a hospital or $300 down the road from a freestanding facility. Well, this is the right place. Let’s get the MRI at the freestanding facility. There’s no reduction in quality, no reduction in service, less cost.

 

It encourages management of the ED [emergency] department. We’ve talked about this at length. It’s come up in Dr. Drozda’s presentation as well as Debra Halladay’s presentation. There [are] opportunities for physicians to reach out to their membership and bring them into the office in lieu of using the ED for routine care. There [are] also opportunities to utilize preventive care to ensure that the services don’t occur at the end of the day in the emergency department for more significant problems.

 

It rewards physicians for achieving specific quality measures. All of our Model One arrangements have quality bonus arrangements in place. The key to this is a) that those quality bonus arrangements be measurable; and b) that they be realistically achievable by the physicians. What you’ll see in some of our arrangements are, for example, bonuses tied to immunizations rates. We’ll see bonuses tied to, again, going back to it, annual dental exams. And we’ll see bonuses tied to, for example, appropriate use of the emergency department.

 

And finally, it’s an opportunity for our primary care physician partners to be compensated at greater than standard Medicaid fees.


 

So, how do we manage it? Well, the first thing we do is we provide a tool. It’s a large suite of management reports that we’ve developed over a period of years. We feel like this is something that’s very unique to Centene. It’s not something that we’ve seen our competitors be able to produce. And it’s not something that you can go buy off the shelf. These reports are critical to the success. They provide the physicians with the information that they need to manage the services being provided in this model.

 

Some examples would be giving them the status of their funds. Where do we stand today? Another example would be who is charging large claims to these funds? Let’s make sure that they know which patients have different conditions and what they’re being treated - what they’re being treated for and how they’re being treated. And another example would be our ED frequent flyer reports.

 

Other management tools, quarterly meetings - we hold quarterly meetings with each of our Model One physician groups. Those quarterly meetings, we’re going to cover all of those reports, try to identify any things that are actionable in those reports, and then develop action plans around it. We’re going to have a clinical component to these meetings, which is going to include the VPMA from the health plan and physicians from the group. They’re going to look at utilization trends. They’re going to look at the quality measures. And they’re going to again, identify action plans around those items.

 

And we’re also going to have an operational component to the group - to the meeting. And the operational component’s going to include again, physicians as well as probably administrative staff from the physician group. And it’s also going to include contracting, provider affairs and operational folks from the health plan. And they’re going to talk more about process issues, operational questions, contractual questions, transactional questions. And again, this is a critical element to successfully managing these relationships.

 

I’m going to move onto Model One benefits. These are benefits to physicians as well as benefits to the health plan. First of all, the physicians can improve the quality and the effectiveness of the care. We’ve talked about that throughout this. It’s an opportunity for greater reimbursement. Again, if they’re generating surpluses, if they’re earning their quality bonuses, they’re going to walk home with more than a standard Medicaid fee schedule — payment rate.

 

There’s also benefits to Centene, of course. We’ve aligned our incentives with the physicians and that’s, again, on the basis of quality and cost. The efficiencies and the delivery of healthcare - right place, right service, right time - that’s very important to us. And then again, if the physicians are willing to take more of our patients, open up their panels and let more Centene patients in, it’s going to increase our capacity and allow us to grow.

 

Here’s sort of some status on where we are today with Model One. We are - we currently utilize the Model One in five health plans. We use it in our Buckeye Community Health Plan in Ohio; Managed Health Services in Wisconsin; Managed Health Services in Indiana; Superior in


Texas; and First Guard. We’re also rolling it out in Georgia, as a matter of fact, as we do our Georgia development and are getting some very positive reception from some large physician groups.

 

Right now, Model One is most prevalent in two of our larger health plans and that’s Superior and Managed Health Services Indiana. In fact, 63% of our members in those health plans are assigned to over 800 primary care physicians under Model One contracts. The HBR, again, in those two health plans for our Model One groups is running 3 to 5% below the HBR for the entire health plan. And bear in mind, that’s after we’ve distributed the surplus and the quality bonus funds to the physicians. So, the physicians are making more and we’re running a better HBR.

 

Finally, what does this all mean? I think it means that the Model One, for us, has continued to demonstrate that it’s an effective tool for us to improve the quality of healthcare. It’s an effective tool for the health plans in terms of growth. It’s an effective tool for the health plans in terms of physician relationships. And finally, it’s an opportunity to produce better medical cost experience.

 

I’m going to move to the next topic, not necessarily quite as exciting as Model One, but we’ll go through it. And this is - we’ve got a contracting process and, at the end of the day, when we create a contract, we’ve got to be able to pay a claim in the system and we want to pay it accurately. We want to pay it timely. In our contracting process, to ensure that we can do that at the end of the day, we have a series of standards, we have a series of processes and controls and we’ve got accountability.

 

For example, in standards, we have a standard language that are produced and put out into the health plan. It’s a defined set of language within a contract that meets our medical management and other operational requirements, systems requirements, financial requirements and legal and compliance requirements. We also produce a tool. It’s a drafting workbook that gives the contracting team a defined set of contracting alternatives. Those are pre-approved and, in a negotiation, they can move to those alternatives. And again, we already know that all the different disciplines within the organization have said, yes, that still meets our business requirements.

 

We also have templates or standards around reimbursement methodology and this goes to what Deborah Halladay was talking about earlier. We’ve got certain types of methodologies that we want to use and types that we don’t want to use. So, we build templates around that. And then, we’ve got standards around rate levels. As Dr. Drozda said earlier, we want to be Medicaid fee for service equivalent or better. So we built standards around that.

 

And that’s going to take us to the controls. Anytime that we deviate from, for example, the standard language for approved alternatives, it has to go through corporate contracting. And then corporate contracting brings together the different disciplines, medical management, systems, legal and compliance, to ensure that either, a) this is something that we can do — we can put this in place, or b) it’s something that we can’t. And so it’s either going to be approved, rejected or an alternative can be offered.

 

The same is true for our reimbursement methodology. Any deviation from the standard template for reimbursement has to go to corporate contracting for approval. And again, the role of corporate contracting is to bring together the different disciplines and make sure that we’re meeting the business requirements of the health plan. In fact, any deviation or any, I should call it a new reimbursement or compensation program for physicians, has to go to corporate contracting and then to legal for review to ensure that it’s compliant with safe harbors.

 

And then the reimbursement levels, not just the rate methodology, but are we — how are we paying? Are we going outside the standards that we’ve established, i.e., Medicaid fee-for-service equivalency? That’s going to go through our healthcare economics unit, which is part of the corporate finance department, to ensure that it meets our operating plan for that health plan, that we’re going to still hit our HBR targets, our medical cost targets, before that’s going to be approved.

 

And then finally, the accountability piece - I jumped ahead there — touch on accountability. We have contract managers or sometimes we call them contract implementation managers in our health plans, and they’re responsible for this end-to-end process. At the beginning of the process, the contracting process, they’re going to ensure that the templates are used; if we’re deviating from the templates that we’re following the appropriate exception process; and that all documentation is appropriate at the end of the day. So they’ve got an end-to-end process from there to the point that that contract is signed.

 

So at this point we’ve got a signed contract, it’s an executed contract and we’re going to move into the contract setup process. And our contract setup process we also have standards. Those standards are going to include templates that are pre-built and pre-tested for configuration in the system. As long as we’re following our standard template at the front end, at the contracting end, that template can be just auto-loaded into the system and it’s ready to go. And, in fact, the vast majority of our providers are on those standard reimbursement methodologies, those standard templates.


We’ve also got standards for any deviations. There’s certain documentation and processes that have to occur in order for that deviation to be put into the system because if there’s a deviation there’s going to have to be unique configurations.

 

So there’s a final quality review. If we see something that we didn’t expect, we can go back in and correct the system. If we again pass it through the quality review, we’ve got a final contract in the system. So again, our accountability goes back to this contract manager who end-to-end, from the beginning of the contract process to the end of the contract setup process, has accountability to make sure that this gets done correctly.

 

So we believe that we’ve got the proper set of standards, processes, controls, even technology and accountability to ensure that we’re going to get the contracts in the system to be able to pay the claims correctly and timely once those contracts are uploaded.

 

So thank you. And I think Dr. Drozda’s going to come back and wrap up for us.

 

Wikinvest © 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012. Use of this site is subject to express Terms of Service, Privacy Policy, and Disclaimer. By continuing past this page, you agree to abide by these terms. Any information provided by Wikinvest, including but not limited to company data, competitors, business analysis, market share, sales revenues and other operating metrics, earnings call analysis, conference call transcripts, industry information, or price targets should not be construed as research, trading tips or recommendations, or investment advice and is provided with no warrants as to its accuracy. Stock market data, including US and International equity symbols, stock quotes, share prices, earnings ratios, and other fundamental data is provided by data partners. Stock market quotes delayed at least 15 minutes for NASDAQ, 20 mins for NYSE and AMEX. Market data by Xignite. See data providers for more details. Company names, products, services and branding cited herein may be trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners. The use of trademarks or service marks of another is not a representation that the other is affiliated with, sponsors, is sponsored by, endorses, or is endorsed by Wikinvest.
Powered by MediaWiki