TrueCar, Inc. 10-Q 2009
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934
7700 Bonhomme Avenue, St. Louis, Missouri 63105
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ.
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
Centrue Financial Corporation
See Accompanying Notes to Unaudited Financial Statements
Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Centrue Financial Corporation (the Company) is a bank holding company organized under the laws of the State of Delaware. The Company provides a full range of banking services to individual and corporate customers located in markets extending from the far western and southern suburbs of the Chicago metropolitan area across Central Illinois down to the metropolitan St. Louis area. These services include demand, time, and savings deposits; business and consumer lending; and mortgage banking. Brokerage, asset management, and trust services are provided to our customers on a referral basis to third party providers. The Company is subject to competition from other financial institutions and nonfinancial institutions providing financial services. Additionally, the Company and its subsidiary, Centrue Bank (the Bank), are subject to regulations of certain regulatory agencies and undergo periodic examinations by those regulatory agencies.
Basis of presentation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and Centrue Bank. Intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Certain 2008 amounts have been reclassified to conform to the 2009 presentation. Assets held in an agency or fiduciary capacity are not assets of the Company and, accordingly, are not included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements of Centrue Financial Corporation have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission for interim financial reporting. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all normal and recurring adjustments which are necessary to fairly present the results for the interim periods presented have been included. The preparation of financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the recorded amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reported period. The allowance for loan losses, carrying value of goodwill, value of mortgage servicing rights, deferred taxes, and fair values of financial instruments are particularly subject to change. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
For further information with respect to significant accounting policies followed by the Company in the preparation of its consolidated financial statements, refer to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. The annualized results of operations during the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the results expected for the year ending December 31, 2009. All financial information is in thousands (000s), except shares and per share data.
Note 2. Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 were computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 were computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of shares outstanding, adjusted for the dilutive effect of the stock options and warrants. Computations for basic and diluted earnings per share are provided as follows:
Note 2. Earnings Per Share (continued)
There were approximately 674,669 and 406,300 options and 508,320 and 0 warrants outstanding at June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively that were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share. These options and warrants were anti-dilutive since the exercise prices were greater than the average market price of the common stock.
Note 3. Available for Sale Securities
The primary strategic objective related to the Companys $215,094 investment securities portfolio is to assist with liquidity and interest rate risk management. These securities are classified as available-for-sale and are carried at fair value. The Company does not have any securities classified as trading or held-to-maturity.
The fair value of available-for-sale securities and the related, gross unrealized gains and losses recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively:
Note 3. Available for Sale Securities (continued)
The amounts below include the activity for available-for-sale securities related to sales, maturities and calls:
Securities with unrealized losses not recognized in income are as follows presented by length of time individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position:
Note 3. Available for Sale Securities (continued)
The fair values of securities classified as available-for-sale at June 30, 2009, by contractual maturity, are shown as follows. Securities not due at a single maturity date, including mortgage-backed securities, collateralized mortgage obligations, and equity securities are shown separately.
The following table below presents a rollforward of the credit losses recognized in earnings for the three month period ended June 30, 2009:
See Note 9 on Fair Value for additional information about our analysis on the security portfolio related to the fair value and other-than-temporary impairment disclosures of these instruments.
Note 4. Loans
The following table describes the composition of loans by major categories outstanding as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively:
The following table presents data on impaired loans:
In originating loans, the Company recognizes that credit losses will be experienced and the risk of loss will vary with, among other things, current economic conditions; the type of loan being made; the creditworthiness of the borrower over the term of the loan; and in the case of a collateralized loan, the quality of the collateral for such loan. The allowance for loan losses represents the Companys estimate of the allowance necessary to provide for probable incurred losses in the loan portfolio. In making this determination, the Company analyzes the ultimate collectability of the loans in its portfolio; incorporating feedback provided by internal loan staff; the independent loan review function; and information provided by regulatory agencies. Included in the impaired loans above is $584 of trouble debt restructurings. These consist of 8 loans which are 1 to 4 family, installment, or home equity loans.
The Company has loans held for sale of $2,262 and $2,143 as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 respectively.
Note 4. Loans (continued)
The Company conducts a quarterly evaluation as to the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses. Transactions in the allowance for loan losses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 are summarized below:
Note 5. Share Based Compensation
In 1999, the Company adopted the 1999 Option Plan. Under the 1999 Option Plan, nonqualified options may be granted to employees and eligible directors of the Company and its subsidiaries to purchase the Companys common stock at 100% of the fair market value on the date the option is granted. The Company has authorized 50,000 shares for issuance under the 1999 Option Plan. During 1999, 40,750 of these shares were granted and are 100% fully vested. The options have an exercise period of ten years from the date of grant. There are 9,250 shares available for grant under this plan.
In April 2003, the Company adopted the 2003 Option Plan. Under the 2003 Option Plan, as amended on April 24, 2007, nonqualified options, incentive stock options, restricted stock and/or stock appreciation rights may be granted to employees and outside directors of the Company and its subsidiaries to purchase the Companys common stock at an exercise price to be determined by the Executive and Compensation committee. Pursuant to the 2003 Option Plan, 570,000 shares of the Companys unissued common stock have been reserved for issuance upon the exercise of options and rights granted under the 2003 Option Plan. The options have an exercise period of seven to ten years from the date of grant. There are 66,000 shares remaining for grants under this plan.
The Company awarded 5,000 restricted common stock awards in November, 2006 that were available under the restricted stock portion of the plan. The restricted shares were issued out of treasury shares with an aggregate grant date fair value of $90. The awards were granted using the fair value as the last sale price as quoted on the NASDAQ Stock Market on the date of grant of $18.03. The awarded shares vested at a rate of 20% of the initially awarded amount per year, beginning on the date of the award and were contingent upon continuous service by the recipient through the vesting date. As of April 3, 2009, the contingency was not fulfilled and the remaining 2,000 shares of unvested restricted stock were forfeited and returned to treasury stock.
Note 5. Share Based Compensation (continued)
A summary of the status of the option plans as of June 30, 2009, and changes during the period ended on those dates is presented below:
Options outstanding at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 were as follows:
Note 5. Share Based Compensation (continued)
Information related to the stock option plan during the quarter ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 was as follows:
The compensation cost that has been charged against income for the stock options portion of the Equity Incentive Plan was $155 and $232 for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008. For the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, it was $223 and $256. The compensation cost that has been charged against income for the restricted stock portion of the Equity Incentive Plan was $(17) and $4 for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008. The compensation cost that has been charged against income for the restricted stock portion of the Equity Incentive Plan was $(12) and $9 for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008. For the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2009, the negative amounts reflect the adjustment of previously recognized expense due to the forfeiture of the remainder of this restricted stock.
The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of grant using a closed form option valuation (Black-Scholes) model that uses the assumptions noted in the table below. Expected volatilities are based on historical volatilities of the Companys common stock. The Company uses historical data to estimate option exercise and post-vesting termination behavior. (Employee and management options are tracked separately). The expected term of options granted is based on historical data and represents the period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding, which takes into account that the options are not transferable. The risk-free interest rate for the expected term of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of the grant.
Unrecognized stock option compensation expense related to unvested awards (net of estimated forfeitures) for the remainder of 2009 and beyond is estimated as follows:
Note 6. Contingent Liabilities and Other Matters
Neither the Company nor its subsidiary is involved in any pending legal proceedings other than routine legal proceedings occurring in the normal course of business, which, in the opinion of management, in the aggregate, are not material to the Companys consolidated financial condition.
Note 7. Segment Information
The Company utilizes an internal reporting and planning process that focuses on lines of business (LOB). The reportable segments are determined by the products and services offered, primarily distinguished between retail, commercial, treasury, and other operations. Loans and deposits generate the revenues in the commercial segments; deposits, loans, secondary mortgage sales and servicing generates the revenue in the retail segment; investment income generates the revenue in the treasury segment; and holding company services generate revenue in the other operations segment. The net allocations line represents the allocation of the costs that are overhead being spread to the specific segments.
The accounting policies used with respect to segment reporting are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies as forth in Note 1. Segment performance is evaluated using net income.
Information reported internally for performance assessment follows:
Note 7. Segment Information (continued)
Note 8. Borrowed Funds and Debt Obligations
On March 31, 2008, the Company entered into a loan agreement with Bank of America (BofA) consisting of three credit facilities: a secured revolving line of credit, a secured term facility, and a subordinated debt. In February, 2009, the loan agreement on the revolving line of credit was amended resulting in an aggregate principal amount of $20,250 in borrowings. The first credit facility consists of a $10,000 secured revolving line of credit which matured on June 30, 2009. The secured revolving line of credit was not renewed by BofA at maturity. When it matured on June 30, 2009, there was no balance on this line of credit while at December 31, 2008 it had a balance of $8,865. The second credit facility consists of a $250 secured term facility, which will mature on March 31, 2015. The balance on this facility was $250 as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008. The third credit facility consists of $10,000 in subordinated debt, which also matures on March 31, 2015. The balance on this facility was $10,000 as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008. The interest rate on the term and subordinated debt credit facilities is three month LIBOR plus 295 basis points. Repayment of each of the remaining two credit facilities is interest only on a quarterly basis, with the principal amount of the loan due at maturity. The term credit facilities are secured by a pledge of the stock of Centrue Bank. The subordinated debt credit facility is unsecured and is intended to qualify as Tier II capital for regulatory purposes.
Note 8. Borrowed Funds and Debt Obligations (continued)
The loan agreement contains customary covenants, including but not limited to, Centrue Banks maintenance of its status as well-capitalized, Centrue Banks minimum return on average assets on an annual basis of 0.50%, Centrue Banks maximum nonperforming assets to primary capital below 20%, and Centrue Banks minimum loan loss reserves to total loans of 1.00%. The Company submitted to BofA its covenant certification as required that it was in compliance with all of the debt covenants with the exception of the covenant related to the return of assets percentage which requires a ROA of 0.50% at the Bank level and the nonperforming asset ratio which requires the ratio to be 20% or below at the Bank level. The ROA at the Bank level was (0.52%) for the period ending June 30, 2009. The nonperforming asset ratio is 49.68%. The Company is using these credit facilities for general working capital purposes. The loan agreement contains no penalty for early repayment of either the revolving credit facility or the subordinated debt credit facility. As of June 30, 2009, the outstanding balance on these lines is $10,250. Additionally, the Company has a note outstanding to an individual with an imputed interest rate of 5.25% maturing on October 24, 2012 for a prior acquisition. The balance as of June 30, 2009 was $630 and December 31, 2008 was $711.
Note 9. Fair Value
SFAS No. 157 defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. SFAS No. 157 also establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The standard describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair values:
Level 1 Quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that the entity has the ability to access as of the measurement date.
Level 2 Quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that the entity has the ability to access as of the measurement date.
Level 3 Significant unobservable inputs that reflect a companys own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability.
The Company used the following methods and significant assumptions to estimate the fair value of each type of financial instrument:
Investment Securities: The fair value of securities available for sale is determined by obtaining quoted prices on nationally recognized securities exchanges (Level 1 inputs) or matrix pricing, which is a mathematical technique widely used in the industry to value debt securities without relying exclusively on quoted prices for the specific securities but rather by relying on the securities relationship to other benchmark quoted securities (Level 2 inputs). If the securities could not be priced using quoted market prices, observable market activity or comparable trades, the financial market was considered not active and the assets were classified as Level 3.
The assets included in Level 3 are trust preferred collateralized debt obligations (CDOs). These securities were historically priced using Level 2 inputs. However, in 2008, the decline in the level of observable inputs and market activity for trust preferred CDOs by the measurement date was significant and resulted in unreliable external pricing. As such, the Company uses an internal OTTI evaluation model to compare the present value of expected cash flows to the previous estimate to ensure there are no adverse changes in cash flows during the quarter. The OTTI model considers the structure and term of the CDO and the financial condition of the underlying issuers. Specifically, the model details interest rates, principal balances of note classes and underlying issuers, the timing and amount of interest and principal payments of the underlying issuers, and the allocation of the payments to the note classes. The current estimate of expected cash flows is based on the most recent trustee reports and any other relevant market information including announcements of interest payment deferrals or defaults of underlying trust preferred securities. Assumptions used in the model include expected future default rates and prepayments.
Note 9. Fair Value (continued)
We assume no recoveries on defaults and treat all interest payment deferrals as defaults. In addition we use the model to stress each CDO, or make assumptions more severe than expected activity, to determine the degree to which assumptions could deteriorate before the CDO could no longer fully support repayment of the Companys note class.
Each bank in the tranche was analyzed so that additional defaults and deferrals could be factored into the cash flow model. Three scenarios were developed that had different assumptions regarding the impact of the economic environment on additional defaults and deferrals. The cash flow for each tranche was updated for each scenario. A discount rate of 450 BP over LIBOR was applied to arrive at the net present value of the cash flows. The discount rate used is approximately 105 basis points above the spread implied by the yield of BBB US Bank debt relative to 3-month LIBOR at quarter end. The results of the three net present value calculations were weighted and one overall value was developed to value the instrument.
Additionally an independent valuation of our portfolio was obtained. This was weighted as the final overall step to arrive at our valuation for June 30, 2009. Due to market conditions as well as the limited trading activity of these securities, the market value of the securities is highly sensitive to assumption changes and market volatility.
At June 30, 2009, the Company held nine pooled trust preferred CDOs with a book value of $19,525 (after second quarter 2009 impairment). These securities were rated high quality (A3 and above) at inception, but at June 30, 2009 S&P rated these securities as B+/B-, which are defined as highly speculative, and C, which is defined as default, with some recovery. The issuers in these securities are primarily banks, but some of the pools do include a limited number of insurance companies.
The Company performed a FAS 115 analysis and evaluated for other-than-temporary-impairment (OTTI) for each of the nine CDOs. Upon completion of the June 30, 2009 analysis, our model indicated other-than-temporary impairment on three of these CDOs, with an aggregate cost basis of $12,457. Total impairment for these three CDOs totaled $8,775, of which $4,538 was related to credit loss based on the Companys analysis of future cash flows. Management has determined that the remaining CDOs is deemed to be only temporarily impaired at quarter-end due to the projected cash flows adjusted for the possible further deterioration is sufficient to return the outstanding principal balance with interest at the stated rate.
During further evaluation of the securities portfolio, a collateralized mortgage obligation (CMO) with an aggregate cost of $1,918 was identified as falling below managements required collateral coverage of 4%. An impairment of $171 was taken on this instrument to bring the collateral coverage back to an acceptable level. This brought the total securities impairment charge for the quarter to $4,709.
The Companys unrealized losses on other securities relate primarily to its investment in pooled trust preferred securities. The decline in fair value is primarily attributable to temporary illiquidity and the financial crisis affecting these markets and not necessarily the expected cash flows of the individual securities. Due to the illiquidity in the market, it is unlikely that the Company would be able to recover its investment in these securities if the Company sold the securities at this time.
Note 9. Fair Value (continued)
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below:
Note 9. Fair Value (continued)
The table below presents a reconciliation and income statement classification of gains and losses for all assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the six months ended June 30, 2009:
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis are summarized below:
Impaired and restructured loans, which are measured for impairment using the fair value of the collateral for collateral dependent loans, had a carrying amount of $86,690 with a valuation allowance of $21,561, resulting in an additional provision for loan losses of $11,401 for the period.
The majority of our impaired loans are collateralized by real estate. The carrying value for these real estate secured impaired loans was based upon information in independent appraisals obtained on the underlying collateral. The methods and assumptions used to estimate fair value are described as follows:
The carrying amount is the estimated fair value for cash and due from banks, federal funds sold, short-term borrowings, accrued interest receivable and payable, demand deposits, short-term debt, and variable rate loans or deposits that reprice frequently and fully. Security fair values are based on the methods described above. The carrying value and fair value of the subordinated debentures issued to capital trusts are estimated using market data for similarly risk weighted items to value them. For fixed rate loans or deposits and for variable rate loans or deposits with infrequent repricing or repricing limits, the fair value is based on discounted cash flows using current market rates applied to the estimated life and credit risk. Fair values for impaired loans are estimated using discounted cash flow analysis or underlying collateral values. The fair value of loans held for sale is based on market quotes. The fair value of debt and redeemable stock is based on current rates for similar financing.
Note 9. Fair Value (continued)
It was not practicable to determine the fair value of the restricted securities due to restrictions placed on its transferability. The fair value of off-balance-sheet items is based on the current fees or cost that would be charged to enter into or terminate such arrangements.
U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles requires companies to perform an annual test for goodwill impairment. The Company performed its last annual goodwill impairment test as of December 31, 2008. Results for that test indicated no impairment since the fair value of the reporting unit exceeded its carrying value. Due primarily to the deterioration in the general economic environment, the resulting decline in the Companys share price and market capitalization in the second quarter, and in conjunction with the decline in earnings and increase in nonperforming loans, the Company engaged a third party consultant to conduct a goodwill impairment test in the second quarter 2009. The impairment test, used to measure the amount of impairment loss, involves a mark-to-market or fair value analysis of the Companys balance sheet. Results of the test indicated that the Company record a non-cash charge of $8,451 for impairment of goodwill recorded at Centrue Bank, in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards 142 Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.
This non-cash impairment charge has no effect on liquidity, cash flows, operations, tangible book value, or regulatory capital ratios at Centrue Bank or Centrue Financial Corporation. The impairment charge represents 34.5% of the $24,494 in total goodwill (prior to impairment charge being taken) as of December 31, 2008 and the net goodwill after the impairment is now $15,880. The goodwill was primarily associated with the November 2006 merger of Centrue Financial Corporation and UnionBancorp, Inc.
The estimated fair values of the Companys financial instruments were as follows:
In addition, other assets and liabilities of the Company that are not defined as financial instruments are not included in the above disclosures, such as property and equipment. Also, nonfinancial instruments typically not recognized in financial statements nevertheless may have value but are not included in the above disclosures. These include, among other items, the estimated earnings power of core deposit accounts, the earnings potential of the trained work force, customer goodwill, and similar items.
Note 10. Participation in the Treasury Capital Purchase Program
On January 9, 2009, the Company completed the sale of $32,668 in preferred shares to the U.S. Department of the Treasury as part of the governments Capital Purchase Program. In exchange for the aggregate consideration of $32,668, the Company issued 32,668 shares of Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series C, with a $1,000 per share liquidation preference, and a warrant to purchase up to 508,320 shares of the Companys common stock at an exercise price of $9.64 per share. Management is accreting the discount on the preferred stock over a five year life using an effective yield.
The preferred securities issued by Centrue pay cumulative dividends of 5% a year for the first five years and 9% a year thereafter. Centrue may, at its option, redeem the preferred securities at their liquidation preference plus accrued and unpaid dividends at any time. Both the preferred securities and the warrant will be accounted for as components of regulatory Tier 1 capital. The securities purchase agreement, between the Company and the Treasury, limits the payment of dividends on the Common Stock to a quarterly cash dividend of $0.14 per share, limits the Companys ability to repurchase its Common Stock, and subjects the Company to certain executive compensation limitations.
Note 11. Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Goodwill initially recorded is subject to the completion of the valuation of assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Purchase accounting adjustments are the adjustments to the initial goodwill recorded at the time an acquisition is completed. Such adjustments generally consist of adjustments to the assigned fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed resulting from the completion of appraisals or other valuations and adjustments to initial estimates recorded for transaction costs or exit liabilities. Goodwill is not amortized but is subject to impairment tests on at least an annual basis. Management performed its annual review of goodwill at December 31, 2008 using the comparable transaction approach and has updated that review each quarter as the stock prices in the financial services sector generally remained out of favor. Due to continued pressures created by the economy on asset quality, the Company hired a third party to conduct an in-depth step one analysis per FAS 142 Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. The results of this analysis showed that the Company failed step one. The third party conducted a step two test which indicated an impairment of $8,451. However, if the economy remains stressed and bank stocks remain out of favor, no assurance can be given that future impairment tests will not result in a charge to earnings.
The change in balance of goodwill during the year is as follows:
In late 2008, the Company completed the sale of their asset management and brokerage product lines. Additionally, the Company entered into an agreement to sell its Trust product line to Hometown National Bank in LaSalle, Illinois. This transaction was completed during the first quarter of 2009. The goodwill impairment related to the sale of Wealth Management, Asset Management and Brokerage is the result of these transactions.
Note 11. Goodwill and Intangible Assets (continued)
Acquired Intangible Assets
Acquired intangible assets were as follows as of the quarter ending:
The core deposit intangible asset recorded in the 2006 merger with Centrue Financial Corporation was $13,035. Aggregate amortization expense was $807 and $990 for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008.
Estimated amortization expense for subsequent periods is as follows:
Note 12. Subsequent Events
As defined in FAS 165, subsequent events are events or transactions that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or available to be issued. Financial statements are considered issued when they are widely distributed to shareholders and other financial statement users for general use and reliance in a form and format that complies with GAAP. The Company has evaluated subsequent events through August 10, 2009, which is the date that the Companys financial statements are being issued.
Note 13. Recent Accounting Developments
On March 19, 2008, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (SFAS 161), which is intended to improve financial reporting for derivative instruments and hedging activities. Additional disclosures will be required that require disclosure of the fair values of derivative instruments and their gains and losses in tabular format. It also requires disclosure of derivatives features that are credit risk-related. These changes will enable investors to better understand their effects on an entitys financial position, financial performance and cash flows. It was effective for financial statements for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008. The impact of this statement did not have a material effect on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
Note 13. Recent Accounting Developments (continued)
In January 2009, the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force finalized Issue No. 99-20-1, Amendments to the Impairment Guidance of EITF Issue No. 99-20. This issue amends the impairment guidance in EITF Issue No. 99-20, Recognition of Interest Income and Impairment on Purchased Beneficial Interests and Beneficial Interests that Continue to be Held by a Transferor in Securitized Financial Assets, to achieve more consistent determination of whether an other-than-temporary impairment has occurred. The FSP also retains and emphasizes the objective of other-than-temporary impairment assessment and the related disclosure requirements in FASB Statement No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities, and other related guidance. If the fair value of an available-for-sale or held-to-maturity debt security is less than its cost basis at the measurement date, generally accepted accounting principles require that the reporting entity assess the impaired security to determine whether the impairment is other than temporary. Other-than-temporary impairments are recognized through earnings. This amendment allows for changes which include using reasonable judgment of the probability that the holder will be unable to collect amounts due rather than using the EITF 99-20s previous requirement to estimate a market participants view of cash flows. Beginning on March 31, 2009, the Company has applied this FSP in determining if our securities have any other-than-temporary impairments.
In April 2009, the FASB issued Staff Position No. 115-2 and No. 124-2, Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments, which amends existing guidance for determining whether impairment is other-than-temporary for debt securities. The FSP requires an entity to assess whether it intends to sell, or it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell a security in an unrealized loss position before recovery of its amortized cost basis. If either of these criteria is met, the entire difference between amortized cost and fair value is recognized in earnings. For securities that do not meet the aforementioned criteria, the amount of impairment related to other factors is recognized in other comprehensive income. Additionally, the FSP expands and increases the frequency of existing disclosures about other-than-temporary impairments for debt and equity securities. This FSP is effective for interim and annual reporting periods after June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009. The Company elected to early-adopt this FSP as of January 1, 2009. During the six months ended June 30, 2009, the Company recognized a $5,746 non-cash impairment charge to write down one of our collateralized debt obligations due to other-than- temporary impairment, which was credit related. Please see Note 9 of the Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Interim Financial Statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
In April 2009, the FASB issued Staff Position No. 157-4, Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset and Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly. This FSP emphasizes that even if there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity, the objective of a fair value measurement remains the same. Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction (that is, not a forced liquidation or distressed sale) between market participants. The FSP provides a number of factors to consider when evaluating whether there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability in relation to normal market activity. In addition, when transactions or quoted prices are not considered orderly, adjustments to those prices based on the weight of available information may be needed to determine the appropriate fair value. The FSP also requires increased disclosures. This FSP is effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009, and shall be applied prospectively. Early adoption is permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009. The Company elected to early-adopt this FSP as of January 1, 2009. The adoption of this FSP did not have a significant impact to the Companys financial statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued Staff Position No. 107-1 and APB 28-1, Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments. This FSP amends FASB Statement No. 107, Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments, to require disclosures about fair value of financial instruments for interim reporting periods of publicly traded companies as well as in annual financial statements. This FSP also amends APB Opinion No. 28, Interim Financial Reporting, to require these disclosures in summarized financial information at interim reporting periods. This FSP is effective for interim reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009. The Company elected to early-adopt this FSP for the three months ended March 31, 2009, and the fair value disclosures are included in this Form 10-Q.
Note 13. Recent Accounting Developments (continued)
In April 2009, the FASB issued Staff Position No. 141(R)-1, Accounting for Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed in a Business Combination that Arise from Contingencies. This FSP amends and clarifies FASB Statement No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations, to address application issues raised by preparers, auditors, and members of the legal profession on initial recognition and measurement, subsequent measurement and accounting, and disclosure of assets and liabilities arising from contingencies in a business combination. This FSP is effective for assets and liabilities arising from contingencies in business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a material effect on the Companys results of operations or financial position.
In June 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) EITF 03-6-1, Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Shared-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities. This FSP addresses whether instruments granted in share-based payment transactions are participating securities prior to vesting and, therefore, need to be included in the earnings allocation in computing earnings per share (EPS). This FSP is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those years. All prior-period EPS data presented shall be adjusted retrospectively. The Company has adopted this FSP for the quarter ending March 31, 2009. There was no material impact to earnings per share. Please refer to Note 2. Earnings Per Share.
In May 2009, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 165, Subsequent Events, (FAS 165). Under FAS 165, the effects of events that occur subsequent to the balance-sheet date should be evaluated through the date the financial statements are either issued or available to be issued. Companies should disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated and whether that date is the date the financial statements were issued or the date the financial statements were available to be issued. FAS 165 requires companies to reflect in their financial statements the effects of subsequent events that provide additional evidence about conditions at the balance-sheet date (recognized subsequent events). The Statement prohibits companies from reflecting in their financial statements the effects of subsequent events that provide evidence about conditions that arose after the balance-sheet date (nonrecognized subsequent events), but requires information about the events to be disclosed if the financial statements would otherwise be misleading. FAS 165 was effective for interim and annual financial periods ending after June 15, 2009 with prospective application. At June 30, 2009, the Company applied this Statement and included the required disclosure in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Centrue Financial Corporation (the Company) is a bank holding company organized under the laws of the State of Delaware. The Company provides a full range of products and services to individual and corporate customers extending from the far western and southern suburbs of the Chicago metropolitan area across Central Illinois down to the metropolitan St. Louis area. These products and services include demand, time, and savings deposits; lending; mortgage banking, brokerage, asset management, and trust services. Brokerage, asset management, and trust services are provided to our customers on a referral basis to third party providers. The Company is subject to competition from other financial institutions, including banks, thrifts and credit unions, as well as nonfinancial institutions providing financial services. Additionally, the Company and its subsidiary Centrue Bank (the Bank) are subject to regulations of certain regulatory agencies and undergo periodic examinations by those regulatory agencies.
The following discussion provides an analysis of the Companys results of operations and financial condition for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 as compared to the same period in 2008. In the opinion of management, all normal and recurring adjustments which are necessary to fairly present the results for the interim periods presented have been included. The preparation of financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the recorded amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reported period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
For further information with respect to significant accounting policies followed by the Company in the preparation of its consolidated financial statements, refer to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. The annualized results of operations during the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the results expected for the year ending December 31, 2009. Certain 2008 amounts have been reclassified to conform to the 2009 presentation. All financial information is in thousands (000s), except shares and per share data.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. By their nature, changes in these assumptions and estimates could significantly affect the Companys financial position or results of operations. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Those critical accounting policies that are of particular significance to the Company are discussed in Note 1 of the Companys 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Allowance for Loan Losses: The allowance for loan losses is a valuation allowance for probable incurred credit losses, increased by the provision for loan losses and decreased by charge-offs less recoveries. Management estimates the allowance balance required based on past loan loss experience, the nature and volume of the portfolio, information about specific borrower situations and estimated collateral values, current economic conditions and other factors. Allocations of the allowance may be made for specific loans, but the entire allowance is available for any loan that, in managements judgment, should be charged off. Loan losses are charged against the allowance when management believes that the uncollectibility of a loan balance is confirmed.
Securities: Available-for-sale securities are those that the Company intends to hold for an indefinite period of time, but not necessarily to maturity. Any decision to sell a security classified as available-for-sale would be based on various factors, including significant movements in interest rates, changes in the maturity mix of the Companys assets and liabilities, liquidity needs, regulatory capital considerations, and other similar factors. Securities available-for-sale are carried at fair value with unrealized gains or losses, net of the related income tax effect, reported in other comprehensive income. Declines in the fair value of securities below their cost that are other than temporary are reflected as realized losses when the Company is unable to retain their position in the instrument allowing it to recover. If the Company is able to retain the instrument and allow it to recover its value, only the credit component of any identified impairment is recognized through the income statement. The fair values of securities available for sale is determined by obtaining quoted prices on nationally recognized securities exchanges (Level 1 inputs) or matrix pricing, which is a mathematical technique widely used in the industry to value debt securities without relying exclusively on quoted prices for the specific securities but rather by relying on the securities relationship to other benchmark quoted securities (Level 2 inputs). If the securities could not be priced using quoted market prices, observable market activity or comparable trades, the financial market was considered not active and the assets were classified as Level 3. The assets included in Level 3 are trust preferred CDOs and one CMO. These securities were historically priced using Level 2 inputs. In 2008, the decline in the level of observable inputs and market activity for trust preferred CDOs by the measurement date was significant and resulted in unreliable external pricing. As such, these investments are now considered Level 3 inputs and are priced using an internal model. The following information is incorporated into the pricing model utilized in determining individual security valuations:
Due to market conditions as well as the limited trading activity of these securities, the market value of the securities is highly sensitive to assumption changes and market volatility.
The Company evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment at least on a quarterly basis, and more frequently when economic and market concerns warrant such valuation. Consideration is given to the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, and the intent and ability of the Company to retain its investment in the issuer for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value. In analyzing an issuers financial condition, the Company may consider whether the securities are issued by the federal government or its agencies, whether downgrades by bond rating agencies have occurred, and the results of reviews of the issuers financial condition. For additional discussion on securities, see Notes 3 and 9 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of this Form 10-Q.
Goodwill and other intangible assets: Goodwill results from business acquisitions and represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of acquired tangible assets and liabilities and identifiable intangible assets. Goodwill is assessed at least annually for impairment and any such impairment will be recognized in the period identified. Other intangible assets consist of core deposit and acquired customer relationship intangible assets arising from whole bank, and branch company acquisitions. They are initially measured at fair value and then are amortized over their estimated useful lives, which is ten years.
Second Quarter 2009 Results:
Results of Operations
Net Income (Loss)
Net income (loss) for the second quarter ended June 30, 2009 equaled $(16,215) or $(2.77) per common diluted share as compared to $2,705 or $0.44 per common diluted share in the same period of 2008. For the six months ended June 30, 2008, net income (loss) equaled $(15,150) or $(2.66) per common diluted share as compared to $5,150 or $0.83 per common diluted share in the same period during 2008. The results for the second quarter 2009 were adversely impacted by a $13,064 provision for loan losses related to asset quality downgrades in the Companys land development, construction and commercial real estate credits and a non-cash charge of $8,451 for impairment of goodwill in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards 142 Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. Also contributing to the loss was a $4,709 non-cash impairment charge related to securities largely reflective of continued deterioration of general economic conditions and extraordinary volatility in the securities markets. Excluding the one-time non-cash goodwill impairment charge, the second quarter 2009 net loss equaled $8,500, or $1.48 per common diluted share.
Return on average equity was (45.09)% for the second quarter 2009 as compared to 9.26% for the same period in 2008. Return on average assets was (4.82)% for the second quarter 2009 compared to 0.80% for the same period in 2008.
Return on average equity was (20.97)% for the six month period ended June 30, 2009 compared to 8.74% for the same period in 2008. Return on average assets was (2.23)% for the six month period ended June 30, 2009 compared to 0.76% for the same period in 2008.
Net Interest Income/ Margin
The Companys net interest income is affected by changes in the amount and mix of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, referred to as volume change. It is also affected by changes in yields earned on interest-earning assets and rates paid on interest-bearing deposits and other borrowed funds referred to as rate change. The following table details each category of average amounts outstanding for interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, average rate earned on all interest-earning assets, average rate paid on all interest-bearing liabilities and the net yield on average interest-earning assets. In addition, the table reflects the changes in net interest income stemming from changes in interest rates and from asset and liability volume, including mix. The change in interest attributable to both rate and volume has been allocated to the changes in the rate and the volume on a pro rata basis.
Fully tax equivalent net interest income for the second quarter 2009 decreased 3.2% to $9,918 as compared to $10,251 for the same period in 2008. The decline in net interest income was due to downward pressure on the net interest margin and interest income lost due to non-accrual loans and loans charged-off.
The net interest margin, on a tax equivalent basis, was 3.27% for the second quarter, representing decreases of 15 basis points from 3.42% recorded in the first quarter of 2009 and 7 basis points from 3.34% recorded in the second quarter of 2008. Over the past four quarters, declining loan yields outpaced the decline in funding costs, reducing both net interest spread and margin compared with the second quarter 2008. Due largely to continued competition in pricing loans and deposits, the protracted economic downturn, the increase of nonaccrual loans, and the Companys interest rate sensitivity, the margin will likely remain under pressure throughout 2009.
Fully tax equivalent net interest income for the six months ended June 30, 2009 totaled $20,504, representing an increase of $285 or 1.4% compared to the $20,219 earned during the same period in 2008. The increase of net interest income was driven by a decrease in the funding balances and a shift to less expensive funding as well as the decline in funding costs exceeded the decline in yields on the earning asset portfolio.
AVERAGE BALANCE SHEET