|
|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| |||||||||
These excerpts taken from the CHK 10-K filed Feb 29, 2008. Oil and Natural Gas Properties Chesapeake follows the full-cost method of accounting under which all costs associated with property acquisition, exploration and development activities are capitalized. We capitalize internal costs that can be directly identified with our acquisition, exploration and development activities and do not include any costs related to production, general corporate overhead or similar activities (see Note 11). Capitalized costs are amortized on a composite unit-of-production method based on proved oil and natural gas reserves. As of December 31, 2007, approximately 79% of our proved reserves were evaluated by independent petroleum engineers, with the balance evaluated by our internal reservoir engineers. In addition, our internal engineers review and update our reserves on a quarterly basis. The average composite rates used for depreciation, depletion and amortization were $2.57 per mcfe in 2007, $2.35 per mcfe in 2006 and $1.91 per mcfe in 2005. Proceeds from the sale of properties are accounted for as reductions of capitalized costs unless such sales involve a significant change in the relationship between costs and the value of proved reserves or the underlying value of unproved properties, in which case a gain or loss is recognized. The costs of unproved properties are excluded from amortization until the properties are evaluated. We review all of our unevaluated properties quarterly to determine whether or not and to what extent proved reserves have been assigned to the properties and otherwise if impairment has occurred. Unevaluated properties are grouped by major prospect area where individual property costs are not significant and are assessed individually when individual costs are significant. We review the carrying value of our oil and natural gas properties under the full-cost accounting rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission on a quarterly basis. This quarterly review is referred to as a ceiling test. Under the ceiling test, capitalized costs, less accumulated amortization and related deferred income taxes, may not exceed an amount equal to the sum of the present value of estimated future net revenues (adjusted for cash flow hedges) less estimated future expenditures to be incurred in developing and producing the proved reserves, less any related income tax effects. In calculating future net revenues, current prices and costs used are those as of the end of the appropriate quarterly period. Such prices are utilized except where different prices are fixed and determinable from applicable contracts for the remaining term of those contracts, including the effects of derivatives qualifying as cash flow hedges. Our qualifying cash flow hedges as of December 31, 2007, which consisted of swaps and collars, covered 358 bcfe, 82 bcfe and 10 bcfe in 2008, 2009 and 2010, respectively. Our oil and natural gas hedging activities are discussed in Note 10 of these consolidated financial statements. Two primary factors impacting the ceiling test are reserve levels and current prices, and their associated impact on the present value of estimated future net revenues. Revisions to estimates of natural gas and oil reserves and/or an increase or decrease in prices can have a material impact on the present value of estimated future net revenues. Any excess of the net book value, less deferred income taxes, is generally written off as an expense. Under SEC regulations, the excess above the ceiling is not expensed (or is reduced) if, subsequent to the end of the period, but prior to the release of the financial statements, oil and natural gas prices increase sufficiently such that an excess above the ceiling would have been eliminated (or reduced) if the increased prices were used in the calculations.
72
Table of ContentsIndex to Financial StatementsCHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
We account for seismic costs in accordance with Rule 4-10 of Regulation S-X. Specifically, Rule 4-10 requires that all companies that use the full-cost method capitalize exploration costs as part of their oil and natural gas properties (i.e., full-cost pool). Exploration costs may be incurred both before acquiring the related property and after acquiring the property. Further, exploration costs include, among other things, geological and geophysical studies and salaries and other expenses of geologists, geophysical crews and others conducting those studies. Such costs are capitalized as incurred. Seismic costs directly associated with the acquisition and evaluation of unproved properties are excluded from the amortization computation until it is determined whether or not proved reserves can be assigned to the properties. The company reviews its unproved properties and associated seismic costs quarterly in order to ascertain whether impairment has incurred. To the extent that seismic costs cannot be directly associated with specific unevaluated properties, they are included in the amortization base as incurred. Oil and Natural Gas Properties SIZE="2">Chesapeake follows the full-cost method of accounting under which all costs associated with property acquisition, exploration and development activities are capitalized. We capitalize internal costs that can be directly identified with our relationship between costs and the value of proved reserves or the underlying value of unproved properties, in which case a gain or loss is recognized. FACE="Times New Roman" SIZE="2">The costs of unproved properties are excluded from amortization until the properties are evaluated. We review all of our unevaluated properties quarterly to determine whether or not and to what extent proved reserves We review the carrying value of our oil and natural gas properties under the full-cost accounting rules of the Securities and Two primary
72 Table of ContentsIndex to Financial StatementsCHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES STYLE="margin-top:6px;margin-bottom:0px" ALIGN="center">NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
We account for seismic costs in accordance with Rule 4-10 of Regulation S-X. Specifically, Rule 4-10 This excerpt taken from the CHK 10-Q filed Nov 9, 2007. Oil and Natural Gas Properties Through multiple acquisitions completed in the Current Period, we invested $623 million in proved properties and $1.885 billion in leasehold and unproved property acquisitions, including capitalized interest. Additionally, we recorded approximately $130 million of deferred income taxes to reflect the tax effect of the cost paid in excess of the tax basis acquired on certain corporate acquisitions. This excerpt taken from the CHK 10-Q filed Aug 8, 2007. Oil and Natural Gas Properties Through multiple acquisitions completed in the Current Period, we invested $397 million in proved properties and, we invested $1.075 billion in leasehold and unproved property acquisitions, including capitalized interest. Additionally we recorded approximately $101 million of deferred income taxes to reflect the tax effect of the cost paid in excess of the tax basis acquired on certain corporate acquisitions. This excerpt taken from the CHK 10-Q filed May 8, 2007. Oil and Natural Gas Properties Through multiple acquisitions completed in the Current Quarter, we invested $215 million in proved properties, including approximately $7 million of deferred income taxes to reflect the tax effect of the cost paid in excess of the tax basis acquired on certain corporate acquisitions. Additionally, we invested $258 million in unproved property acquisitions. This excerpt taken from the CHK 10-K filed Mar 1, 2007. Oil and Natural Gas Properties Through multiple purchases completed in 2006, we invested $1.355 billion in proved properties, including approximately $179.7 million of deferred income taxes to reflect the tax effect of the cost paid in excess of the tax basis acquired on certain corporate acquisitions. Additionally we invested $2.856 billion in unproved property acquisitions. On November 14, 2005, Chesapeake completed its acquisition of Columbia Natural Resources, LLC (CNR), an Appalachian Basin natural gas producer with properties principally located in West Virginia, Kentucky, Ohio, Pennsylvania and New York. The cash purchase price totaled $2.2 billion and was allocated based on the fair values of the assets and liabilities acquired at the date of acquisition. The acquisition was accounted for using the purchase method of accounting and has been included in the consolidated financial statements of Chesapeake since the date of acquisition. The purchase price paid for CNR was allocated as follows ($ in thousands):
111
Table of ContentsIndex to Financial StatementsCHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
The pro forma information below is presented for illustrative purposes only and is based on estimates and assumptions deemed appropriate by Chesapeake. The pro forma information should not be relied upon as an indication of the operating results that Chesapeake would have achieved if the acquisition had occurred at the beginning of each period presented, or of Chesapeakes results after the CNR acquisition. The pro forma information for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 reflect the CNR acquisition as if the acquisition occurred on January 1, 2004.
This excerpt taken from the CHK 10-Q filed Nov 7, 2006. Oil and Natural Gas Properties The following table describes oil and natural gas property acquisitions of proved and unproved properties that we completed in the Current Period ($ in millions):
We also recorded approximately $177.7 million of deferred income taxes to reflect the tax effect of the cost paid in excess of the tax basis acquired on certain corporate acquisitions. This excerpt taken from the CHK 10-Q filed Aug 9, 2006. Oil and Natural Gas Properties The following table describes oil and natural gas property acquisitions of proved and unproved properties that we completed in the Current Period ($ in millions):
We also recorded approximately $81.4 million of deferred taxes to reflect the tax effect of the cost paid in excess of the tax basis acquired on certain corporate acquisitions. This excerpt taken from the CHK 10-Q filed May 10, 2006. Oil and Natural Gas Properties The following table describes oil and natural gas property acquisitions of proved and unproved properties that we completed in the Current Quarter ($ in millions):
We also recorded approximately $81.1 million of deferred taxes to reflect the tax effect of the cost paid in excess of the tax basis acquired on certain corporate acquisitions. | EXCERPTS ON THIS PAGE:
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||