
|
|


Church & Dwight Company (CHD) |


Suggest other news sources for this topic

WIKI ANALYSISChurch & Dwight Company (NYSE: CHD) recorded 2007 total revenues of $2.2 billion. The company sells branded consumer products in the United States and abroad. The company's brands include Arm and Hammer and Trojan.[1] The company sells its consumer products through retailers such as Wal-Mart (WMT) [2]
In Q3 2008, falling consumer spending helped to increase purchases of Church & Dwight's value oriented products.[3] Also in 2007, Church & Dwight's sales to Wal-Mart Stores (WMT), its largest customer, accounted for 22% of the company's revenues giving Wal-Mart Stores (WMT) increased power to negotiate prices and volume discounts with Church & Dwight as well as exposing to company to decreased demand from the retailer.[4] In addition to facing pricing pressure from Wal-Mart Stores (WMT), Church & Dwight faces competitive pressure when raising prices. In 2006 the company raised the prices of some products 4-10%.[5] The price raises were partially negated because they resulted in decreased volume.[6] The company's consumer products compete with similar products from companies like Procter & Gamble Company (PG), Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) and Unilever NV (UN) while its specialty products compete with those produced by companies such as Ecolab (ECL).
Business OverviewChurch & Dwight produces consumer products under the Arm & Hammer, Brillo, Trojan, Nair and other brand names.[1] The company also sells speciality chemicals, animal nutrition products, and commercial cleaning products.[7] Consumers buy Church & Dwight products at supermarkets such as Safeway (SWY), mass merchandisers such as Wal-Mart Stores (WMT), wholesale clubs such as Costco Wholesale (COST) and similar retail outlets.[2]
Business and Financial Metrics
| Revenue and Income[9][10][11][12] ($ MM) | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 |
| Consumer Domestic | 1,717 | 1,574 | 1,389 | 1,218 |
| Consumer International | 420 | 388 | 337 | 297 |
| Specialty Products | 285 | 259 | 220 | 221 |
| Total Revenue | 2,422 | 2,221 | 1,946 | 1,737 |
| Operating Income | 340 | 305 | 252 | 213 |
| Net Income | 195 | 169 | 139 | 123 |
During 2008, Church & Dwight's total revenue increased by 9.1%.[13] 1.6% of this increase was due to the acquisition of Orajel while the rest of the increase resulted from increased volume and higher selling prices.[13] During the same period of time, gross margin increased from 39.1% to 40.1% as a result of increased prices and cost reduction programs.[13] Between 2006 and 2007, Church & Dwight's total revenue increased by over 14%. 8% of this increase was due to the acquisition of Orange Glo International and Spinbrush.[6] Another 5% of the increase in total revenue was due to increased sales volume while the remaining increase was due to favorable exchange rates.[6] Between 2005 and 2006, Church & Dwight's revenues grew 12%, 10% of which was due to acquisitions.[14]
Business Segments
Key Trends and Forces
3.1% decrease in consumer spending increases sales of Church & Dwight's value oriented products in Q3 2008During Q3 2008, real consumer spending fell 3.1%.[18] Normally, a decrease in consumer spending results in consumers trading down to less expensive goods. However, trading down helps Church & Dwight because value oriented products comprise over 30% of the company's consumer product offerings.[3] Thus, decreases in consumer spending lead to increases in sales of Church & Dwight's value oriented products as consumers seek less expensive alternatives.[3] This effect helped Church & Dwight achieve organic revenue growth of 4% between Q3 2007 and Q3 2008 despite the shrinking U.S. economy.[19]
Church & Dwight's sales to Wal-Mart Stores (WMT), its largest customer, accounted for 22% of the company's 2007 salesDuring 2005, Church & Dwight's sales to Wal-Mart Stores (WMT) accounted for 18% of the company's total sales.[20] In 2007, the percentage of Church & Dwight's sales to Wal-Mart Stores (WMT) increased to 22%.[20] Church & Dwight's dependence on Wal-Mart Stores (WMT) gives Wal-Mart Stores (WMT) increased power to negotiate prices and volume discounts with Church & Dwight as well as exposing to company to contract reductions from the retailer.[4]
Stiff competition from other branded consumer goods companies and store brands makes it hard for Church & Dwight to raise prices without losing salesBecause Church & Dwight faces stiff competition from other consumer products companies and store brands, when the company increases its prices it often receives lower demand. Church & Dwight faces especially strong competition from store brands because of 40% of grocery sales at Wal-Mart Stores (WMT) (Church & Dwight's largest customer) come from the company's store brands.[21] During 2006, Church & Dwight raised prices on products representing 35% of the Consumer Domestic segment's sales by 4-10%.[5] This increase in prices resulted in a 3% increase in the company's total revenues in 2006. However, the price increases made Church & Dwight's products less competitive with those produced by other consumer products companies and with store brands offered by retailers such as Wal-Mart Stores (WMT). As a result, decreases in volume caused by the price increases caused in a 2% decrease in the company's 2006 revenues, partially offsetting the revenue gains from the new prices.[6]
Key CompetitorsChurch & Dwight competes with other branded consumer products companies as well as store brands from retailers such as Safeway (SWY), Wal-Mart Stores (WMT), Walgreen Company (WAG). Church & Dwight's main competitors include:
Church & Dwight and Key Competitors 2007 ($ in millions)
| Company | Total Revenues | Net Income | Net Profit Margin |
| Church & Dwight | 2,221 | 169 | 8% |
| Procter & Gamble Company (PG) | 76,476 | 10,340 | 14% |
| Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) | 13,790 | 1,737 | 13% |
| Unilever NV (UN) | 55,084 | 5,329 | 10% |
| Ecolab (ECL) | 5,470 | 427 | 8% |
Note: Data forUnilever NV (UN)were converted to U.S. dollars using the average USD-EUR exchange rates for 2007.[26]
References


| |||||||