|
|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
C » Topics » Citigroups businesses may be materially adversely affected if it is unable to hire and retain qualified employees.These excerpts taken from the C 10-K filed Feb 27, 2009. Citigroups businesses may be materially adversely affected if it is unable to hire and retain qualified employees. Citigroups performance is largely dependent on the talents and efforts of highly skilled individuals. The Companys continued ability to compete effectively in its businesses, to manage its businesses effectively and to expand into new businesses and geographic regions depends on the Companys ability to attract new employees and to retain and motivate its existing employees. Competition from within the financial services industry and from businesses outside of the financial services industry for qualified employees has often been intense. This is particularly the case in emerging markets, where Citigroup is often competing for qualified employees with entities that have a significantly greater presence or more extensive experience in the region. In addition, in 2008 the market price of Citigroup common stock declined significantly during the year. A substantial portion of the Companys annual bonus compensation paid to its senior employees has been paid in the form of equity, meaning that such awards are not as valuable from a compensatory or retention perspective. Moreover, Citigroup is subject to certain significant compensation restrictions applicable to a broad group of its senior management as a result of its receipt of TARP funding in December 2008 as well as other recently-adopted governmental programs and legislation. Such restrictions include restricted executive incentives, deferral of some executive compensation, equity awards with performance-vesting features, clawback provisions and elimination or restriction of severance pay to senior executives.
49
Table of Contents
Citigroups businesses may be materially adversely affected if it is unable to hire and retain qualified employees. Citigroups performance is largely dependent on the talents and efforts of highly skilled individuals. The Companys continued ability to compete effectively in its businesses, to manage its businesses effectively and to expand into new businesses and geographic regions depends on the Companys ability to attract new employees and to retain and motivate its existing employees. Competition from within the financial services industry and from businesses outside of the financial services industry for qualified employees has often been intense. This is particularly the case in emerging markets, where Citigroup is often competing for qualified employees with entities that have a significantly greater presence or more extensive experience in the region. In addition, in 2008 the market price of Citigroup common stock declined significantly during the year. A substantial portion of the Companys annual bonus compensation paid to its senior employees has been paid in the form of equity, meaning that such awards are not as valuable from a compensatory or retention perspective. Moreover, Citigroup is subject to certain significant compensation restrictions applicable to a broad group of its senior management as a result of its receipt of TARP funding in December 2008 as well as other recently-adopted governmental programs and legislation. Such restrictions include restricted executive incentives, deferral of some executive compensation, equity awards with performance-vesting features, clawback provisions and elimination or restriction of severance pay to senior executives.
49
Table of Contents
| EXCERPTS ON THIS PAGE:
|
| |||||||