|
|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
This excerpt taken from the C 10-K filed Feb 28, 2005. Global Investment Management Net IncomeRegional View
35 Global Investment Management net income increased $195 million in 2004 from the prior year, with increases in Latin America and Japan being partially offset by declines in all other regions. Latin America net income of $75 million in 2004 increased $248 million from 2003, resulting from higher Life Insurance and Annuities results of $184 million (primarily driven by the absence of realized investment losses and other actions from Argentina in 2003 of $134 million and a tax ruling confirming the deductibility of those losses in the 2004 third quarter of $47 million) and higher Asset Management results of $64 million (mainly reflecting the absence of impairments of a DAC asset in Argentina of $42 million and of Argentina GPNs of $9 million, and the absence of a loss on the sale of an El Salvador retirement services business of $10 million). Japan net income of $24 million in 2004 increased $19 million from 2003, primarily reflecting an increase of $16 million in Life Insurance and Annuities from higher business volumes. North America (excluding Mexico) net income of $1.015 billion in 2004 decreased $37 million from 2003, primarily driven by increased legal expenses in Asset Management, partially offset by the increase in income reported by TLA. Asia net income in 2004 of $37 million decreased $13 million from 2003, primarily related to the absence of an $18 million tax benefit arising from the application of APB 23 indefinite investment criteria in Life Insurance and Annuities. EMEA net income of $7 million in 2004 represented a decrease in income of $13 million from 2003, primarily related to the transfer of CAI Institutional performance fees to North America beginning in 2004 and higher expenses in Asset Management. Mexico net income of $153 million in 2004 decreased $9 million from 2003, primarily due to lower results in Asset Management (the impact of higher tax rates, partially offset by lower capital funding costs and higher business volumes). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||