|
|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
C » Topics » Impact on retained earnings of certain fair value elections in accordance with SFAS 159This excerpt taken from the C 10-Q filed Nov 5, 2007. Impact on retained earnings of certain fair value elections in accordance with SFAS 159 Detailed below are the December 31, 2006 carrying values prior to adoption of SFAS 159, the transition adjustments booked to opening retained earnings and the fair values (that is, the carrying values at January 1, 2007 after adoption) for those items that were selected for fair value option accounting and that had an impact on retained earnings:
Additional information regarding each of these items follows. Legg Mason convertible preferred equity securities The Legg Mason convertible preferred equity securities (Legg shares) were acquired in connection with the sale of Citigroup's Asset Management business in December 2005. We hold these shares as a non-strategic investment for long-term appreciation and, therefore, selected fair value option accounting in anticipation of the January 2008 implementation of the Investment Company Audit Guide Statement of Position 07-1, "Clarification of the Scope of Audit and Accounting Guide Audits of Investment Companies and Accounting by Parent Companies and Equity Method Investors for Investment Companies" (SOP). In October 2007, the FASB proposed to delay the implementation of the SOP indefinitely. Under the current investment company accounting model, investments held in investment company vehicles are recorded at full fair value (where changes in fair value are recorded in earnings) and are not subject to consolidation guidelines. Under the SOP, non-strategic investments not held in investment companies, which are deemed similar to non-strategic investments held in Citigroup's investment companies, must be accounted for at full fair value in order for Citigroup to retain investment company accounting in the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements. If investment company accounting requirements cannot be met (for example, if we failed to account for similar non-strategic investments at fair value with changes in value recorded in earnings), Citigroup would be required to account for each investment in the investment company under other relevant accounting standards, including consolidation of majority-owned or controlled investees. We believe that Citigroup's consolidation of non-strategic investments would not provide meaningful information and would confuse readers of our financial statements. Therefore, we have utilized the fair value option to migrate the Legg shares from available-for-sale (where changes in fair value are recorded in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)) to a full fair value model (where changes in value are recorded in earnings). On a prospective basis, as we acquire non-strategic public or private equity investments, we will consider electing fair value accounting for investments that are similar to those held in our investment companies. Prior to the election of fair value option accounting, the shares were classified as available-for-sale securities with the unrealized loss of $232 million as of December 31, 2006 included in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). In connection with the Company's adoption of SFAS 159, this unrealized loss was recorded as a reduction of January 1, 2007 retained earnings as part of the cumulative-effect adjustment. We have no intention of selling the Legg shares prior to our previously estimated recovery period. The Legg shares, which have a fair value of $707 million as of September 30, 2007, are now included in Trading account assets on Citigroup's Consolidated Balance Sheet. Dividends are included in Interest revenue. Selected portfolios of securities purchased under agreements to resell, securities borrowed, securities sold under agreements to repurchase, securities loaned, and certain non-collateralized short-term borrowings The Company elected the fair value option retrospectively for our United States and United Kingdom portfolios of fixed income securities purchased under agreements to resell and 81 fixed income securities sold under agreements to repurchase (and certain non-collateralized short-term borrowings). The fair value option was also elected prospectively from April 2007 for certain portfolios of fixed income securities lending and borrowing transactions based in Japan. In each case, the election was made because these positions are managed on a fair value basis. Specifically, related interest rate risk is managed on a portfolio basis, primarily with derivative instruments that are accounted for at fair value through earnings. Previously, these positions were accounted for on an accrual basis. The cumulative effect of $58 million pretax ($37 million after-tax) from adopting the fair value option for the U.S. and U.K. portfolios was recorded as an increase in the January 1, 2007 retained earnings balance. The September 30, 2007 net balance of $125.3 billion for securities purchased under agreements to resell and securities borrowed and $313.4 billion for securities sold under agreements to repurchase and securities loaned are included in their respective accounts in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The uncollateralized short-term borrowings of $5.3 billion are recorded in that account in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Changes in fair value for transactions in these portfolios are recorded in Principal transactions. The related interest revenue and interest expense are measured based on the contractual rates specified in the transactions and are reported as interest revenue and expense in the Consolidated Statement of Income. Selected letters of credit and revolving loans hedged by credit default swaps or participation notes The Company has elected fair value option accounting for certain letters of credit that are hedged with derivative instruments or participation notes. Upon electing the fair value option, the related portions of the allowance for loan losses and the allowance for unfunded lending commitments were reversed. Citigroup elected the fair value option for these transactions because the risk is managed on a fair value basis, and to mitigate accounting mismatches. The cumulative effect of $14 million pretax ($9 million after-tax) from adopting fair value option accounting was recorded as an increase in the January 1, 2007 retained earnings balance. The change in fair value as well as the receipt of related fees was reported as Principal transactions in the Company's Consolidated Statement of Income. The notional amount of these unfunded letters of credit was $1.4 billion as of September 30, 2007. The amount funded was insignificant with no amounts 90 days or more past due, or on a non-accrual status at September 30, 2007. These items have been classified appropriately in Trading account assets or Trading account liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Various miscellaneous eligible items Several miscellaneous eligible items previously classified as available-for-sale securities were selected for fair value option accounting. These items were selected in preparation for the adoption of the Investment Company Audit Guide SOP, as previously discussed. This excerpt taken from the C 10-Q filed Aug 3, 2007. Impact on retained earnings of certain fair value elections in accordance with SFAS 159 Detailed below are the December 31, 2006 carrying values prior to adoption of SFAS 159, the transition adjustments booked to opening retained earnings and the fair values (that is, the carrying values at January 1, 2007 after adoption) for those items that were selected for fair value option accounting and that had an impact on retained earnings:
(1) The Legg Mason securities as well as several miscellaneous items were previously reported at fair value within available-for-sale securities. The cumulative-effect adjustment represents the reclassification of the related unrealized gain/loss from Accumulated other comprehensive income to Retained earnings upon the adoption of the fair value option. (2) Excludes netting of the amounts due from securities purchased under agreements to resell and the amounts owed under securities sold under agreements to repurchase in accordance with FASB Interpretation No. 41, Offsetting of Amounts Related to Certain Repurchase and Reverse Repurchase Agreements. | EXCERPTS ON THIS PAGE:
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||