C » Topics » Selected letters of credit and revolving loans hedged by credit default swaps or participation notes

This excerpt taken from the C 10-Q filed Nov 6, 2009.

Selected letters of credit and revolving loans hedged by credit default swaps or participation notes

        The Company has elected the fair-value option for certain letters of credit that are hedged with derivative instruments or participation notes. Upon electing the fair-value option, the related portions of the allowance for loan losses and the allowance for unfunded lending commitments were reversed. Citigroup elected the fair-value option for these transactions because the risk is managed on a fair-value basis and to mitigate accounting mismatches.

        The notional amount of these unfunded letters of credit was $1.8 billion as of September 30, 2009 and $1.4 billion as of December 31, 2008. The amount funded was insignificant with no amounts 90 days or more past due or on a non-accrual status at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008.

        These items have been classified in Trading account assets or Trading account liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Changes in fair value of these items are classified in Principal transactions in the Company's Consolidated Statement of Income.

This excerpt taken from the C 8-K filed Oct 13, 2009.

Selected letters of credit and revolving loans hedged by credit default swaps or participation notes

 

The Company has elected the fair-value option for certain letters of credit that are hedged with derivative instruments or participation notes. Upon electing the fair-value option, the related portions of the allowance for loan losses and the allowance for unfunded lending commitments were reversed. Citigroup elected the fair-value option for these transactions because the risk is managed on a fair-value basis and to mitigate accounting mismatches. The notional amount of these unfunded letters of credit was $1.4 billion as of December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007. The amount funded was insignificant with no amounts 90 days or more past due or on a non-accrual status at December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007.

 

These items have been classified appropriately in Trading account assets or Trading account liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Changes in fair value of these items are classified in Principal transactions in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Income.

 

This excerpt taken from the C 10-Q filed Aug 7, 2009.

Selected letters of credit and revolving loans hedged by credit default swaps or participation notes

        The Company has elected the fair-value option for certain letters of credit that are hedged with derivative instruments or participation notes. Upon electing the fair-value option, the related portions of the allowance for loan losses and the allowance for unfunded lending commitments were reversed. Citigroup elected the fair-value option for these transactions because the risk is managed on a fair-value basis and to mitigate accounting mismatches.

        The notional amount of these unfunded letters of credit was $2 billion as of June 30, 2009 and $1.4 billion as of December 31, 2008. The amount funded was insignificant with no amounts 90 days or more past due or on a non-accrual status at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008.

        These items have been classified in Trading account assets or Trading account liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Changes in fair value of these items are classified in Principal transactions in the Company's Consolidated Statement of Income.

This excerpt taken from the C 10-Q filed May 11, 2009.

Selected letters of credit and revolving loans hedged by credit default swaps or participation notes

        The Company has elected the fair-value option for certain letters of credit that are hedged with derivative instruments or participation notes. Upon electing the fair-value option, the related portions of the allowance for loan losses and the allowance for unfunded lending commitments were reversed. Citigroup elected the fair-value option for these transactions because the risk is managed on a fair-value basis and to mitigate accounting mismatches.

        The notional amount of these unfunded letters of credit was $1.4 billion as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008. The amount funded was insignificant with no amounts 90 days or more past due or on a non-accrual status at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008.

        These items have been classified appropriately in Trading account assets or Trading account liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Changes in fair value of these items are classified in Principal transactions in the Company's Consolidated Statement of Income.

These excerpts taken from the C 10-K filed Feb 27, 2009.

Selected letters of credit and revolving loans hedged by credit default swaps or participation notes

The Company has elected the fair-value option for certain letters of credit that are hedged with derivative instruments or participation notes. Upon electing the fair-value option, the related portions of the allowance for loan losses and the allowance for unfunded lending commitments were reversed. Citigroup elected the fair-value option for these transactions because the risk is managed on a fair-value basis and to mitigate accounting mismatches.


 

204


Table of Contents

 

The notional amount of these unfunded letters of credit was $1.4 billion as of December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007. The amount funded was insignificant with no amounts 90 days or more past due or on a non-accrual status at December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007.

These items have been classified appropriately in Trading account assets or Trading account liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Changes in fair value of these items are classified in Principal transactions in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Income.

Selected letters of credit and revolving loans hedged by credit default swaps or participation notes

The Company has elected the fair-value option for certain letters of credit that are hedged with derivative instruments or participation notes. Upon electing the fair-value option, the related portions of the allowance for loan losses and the allowance for unfunded lending commitments were reversed. Citigroup elected the fair-value option for these transactions because the risk is managed on a fair-value basis and to mitigate accounting mismatches.


 

204


Table of Contents

 

The notional amount of these unfunded letters of credit was $1.4 billion as of December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007. The amount funded was insignificant with no amounts 90 days or more past due or on a non-accrual status at December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007.

These items have been classified appropriately in Trading account assets or Trading account liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Changes in fair value of these items are classified in Principal transactions in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Income.

This excerpt taken from the C 8-K filed Jan 23, 2009.

Selected letters of credit and revolving loans hedged by credit default swaps or participation notes

 

The Company has elected fair-value accounting for certain letters of credit that are hedged with derivative instruments or participation notes. Upon electing the fair-value option, the related portions of the allowance for loan losses and the allowance for unfunded lending commitments were reversed. Citigroup elected the fair-value option for these transactions because the risk is managed on a fair-value basis, and to mitigate accounting mismatches.

 

The cumulative effect of $14 million pretax ($9 million after-tax) of adopting fair-value option accounting was recorded as an increase in the January 1, 2007 Retained earnings balance. The change in fair value as well as the receipt of related fees was reported as Principal transactions in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Income.

 

The notional amount of these unfunded letters of credit was $1.4 billion as of December 31, 2007. The amount funded was insignificant with no amounts 90 days or more past due or on a non-accrual status at December 31, 2007.

 

These items have been classified appropriately in Trading account assets or Trading account liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

 

This excerpt taken from the C 10-Q filed Oct 31, 2008.

Selected letters of credit and revolving loans hedged by credit default swaps or participation notes

        The Company has elected fair-value accounting for certain letters of credit that are hedged with derivative instruments or participation notes. Upon electing the fair-value option, the related portions of the allowance for loan losses and the allowance for unfunded lending commitments were reversed. Citigroup elected the fair-value option for these transactions because the risk is managed on a fair-value basis and to mitigate accounting mismatches.

        The cumulative effect of $14 million pretax ($9 million after-tax) of adopting fair-value option accounting was recorded as an increase in the January 1, 2007 Retained earnings balance. The change in fair value, as well as the receipt of related fees, were reported as Principal transactions in the Company's Consolidated Statement of Income.

        The notional amount of these unfunded letters of credit was $1.4 billion as of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007. The amount funded was insignificant with no amounts 90 days or more past due or on a non-accrual status at September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007.

        These items have been classified appropriately in Trading account assets or Trading account liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

This excerpt taken from the C 8-K filed Aug 14, 2008.

Selected letters of credit and revolving loans hedged by credit default swaps or participation notes

 

The Company has elected fair-value accounting for certain letters of credit that are hedged with derivative instruments or participation notes. Upon electing the fair-value option, the related portions of the allowance for loan losses and the allowance for unfunded lending commitments were reversed. Citigroup elected the fair-value option for these transactions because the risk is managed on a fair-value basis, and to mitigate accounting mismatches.

 

The cumulative effect of $14 million pretax ($9 million after-tax) of adopting fair-value option accounting was recorded as an increase in the January 1, 2007 Retained earnings balance. The change in fair value as well as the receipt of related fees was reported as Principal transactions in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Income.

 

The notional amount of these unfunded letters of credit was $1.4 billion as of December 31, 2007. The amount funded was insignificant with no amounts 90 days or more past due or on a non-accrual status at December 31, 2007.

 

These items have been classified appropriately in Trading account assets or Trading account liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

 

This excerpt taken from the C 10-Q filed Aug 1, 2008.

Selected letters of credit and revolving loans hedged by credit default swaps or participation notes

        The Company has elected fair-value accounting for certain letters of credit that are hedged with derivative instruments or participation notes. Upon electing the fair-value option, the related portions of the allowance for loan losses and the allowance for unfunded lending commitments were reversed. Citigroup elected the fair-value option for these transactions because the risk is managed on a fair-value basis and to mitigate accounting mismatches.

        The cumulative effect of $14 million pretax ($9 million after-tax) of adopting fair-value option accounting was recorded as an increase in the January 1, 2007 Retained earnings balance. The change in fair value, as well as the receipt of related fees, were reported as Principal transactions in the Company's Consolidated Statement of Income.

        The notional amount of these unfunded letters of credit was $1.4 billion as of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007. The amount funded was insignificant with no amounts 90 days or more past due or on a non-accrual status at June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007.

        These items have been classified appropriately in Trading account assets or Trading account liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

This excerpt taken from the C 10-Q filed May 2, 2008.

Selected letters of credit and revolving loans hedged by credit default swaps or participation notes

        The Company has elected fair-value accounting for certain letters of credit that are hedged with derivative instruments or participation notes. Upon electing the fair-value option, the related portions of the allowance for loan losses and the allowance for unfunded lending commitments were reversed. Citigroup elected the fair-value option for these transactions because the risk is managed on a fair-value basis, and to mitigate accounting mismatches.

        The cumulative effect of $14 million pretax ($9 million after-tax) of adopting fair-value option accounting was recorded as an increase in the January 1, 2007 Retained earnings balance. The change in fair value as well as the receipt of related fees was reported as Principal transactions in the Company's Consolidated Statement of Income.

        The notional amount of these unfunded letters of credit was $1.4 billion as of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively. The amount funded was insignificant with no amounts 90 days or more past due or on a non-accrual status at March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007.

        These items have been classified appropriately in Trading account assets or Trading account liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

This excerpt taken from the C 10-K filed Feb 22, 2008.

Selected letters of credit and revolving loans hedged by credit default swaps or participation notes

The Company has elected fair-value accounting for certain letters of credit that are hedged with derivative instruments or participation notes. Upon electing the fair-value option, the related portions of the allowance for loan losses and the allowance for unfunded lending commitments were reversed. Citigroup elected the fair-value option for these transactions because the risk is managed on a fair-value basis, and to mitigate accounting mismatches.

The cumulative effect of $14 million pretax ($9 million after-tax) of adopting fair-value option accounting was recorded as an increase in the January 1, 2007 Retained earnings balance. The change in fair value as well as the receipt of related fees was reported as Principal transactions in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Income.

The notional amount of these unfunded letters of credit was $1.4 billion as of December 31, 2007. The amount funded was insignificant with no amounts 90 days or more past due or on a non-accrual status at December 31, 2007.

These items have been classified appropriately in Trading account assets or Trading account liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

This excerpt taken from the C 10-Q filed Nov 5, 2007.

Selected letters of credit and revolving loans hedged by credit default swaps or participation notes

        The Company has elected fair value option accounting for certain letters of credit that are hedged with derivative instruments or participation notes. Upon electing the fair value option, the related portions of the allowance for loan losses and the allowance for unfunded lending commitments were reversed. Citigroup elected the fair value option for these transactions because the risk is managed on a fair value basis, and to mitigate accounting mismatches.

        The cumulative effect of $14 million pretax ($9 million after-tax) from adopting fair value option accounting was recorded as an increase in the January 1, 2007 retained earnings balance. The change in fair value as well as the receipt of related fees was reported as Principal transactions in the Company's Consolidated Statement of Income.

        The notional amount of these unfunded letters of credit was $1.4 billion as of September 30, 2007. The amount funded was insignificant with no amounts 90 days or more past due, or on a non-accrual status at September 30, 2007.

        These items have been classified appropriately in Trading account assets or Trading account liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

This excerpt taken from the C 10-Q filed Aug 3, 2007.

Selected letters of credit and revolving loans hedged by credit default swaps or participation notes

The Company has elected fair value option accounting for certain letters of credit that are hedged with derivative instruments or participation notes. Upon electing the fair value option, the related portions of the allowance for loan losses and the allowance for unfunded lending commitments were reversed. Citigroup elected the fair value option for these transactions because the risk is managed on a fair value basis, and to mitigate accounting mismatches.

The cumulative effect of $14 million pretax ($9 million after-tax) from adopting fair value option accounting was recorded as an increase in the January 1, 2007 retained earnings balance.  The change in fair value as well as the receipt of related fees was reported as Principal transactions in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Income.

The notional amount of these unfunded letters of credit was $1.4 billion as of June 30, 2007.  The amount funded was insignificant with no amounts 90 days or more past due, or on a non-accrual status at June 30, 2007.

These items have been classified appropriately in Trading account assets or Trading account liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

This excerpt taken from the C 10-Q filed May 4, 2007.

Selected letters of credit and revolving loans hedged by credit default swaps or participation notes

        The Company has elected fair value option accounting for certain letters of credit that are hedged with derivative instruments or participation notes. Upon electing the fair value option, the related portions of the allowance for loan losses and the allowance for unfunded lending commitments were reversed. Citigroup elected the fair value option for these transactions because the risk is managed on a fair value basis, and to mitigate accounting mismatches

        The cumulative effect of $14 million pretax ($9 million after-tax) from adopting fair value option accounting was recorded as an increase in the January 1, 2007 retained earnings balance. The 2007 first quarter change in fair value for these items was a pretax gain of $1.7 million. This change in fair value as well as the receipt of related fees was reported as Principal transactions in the Company's Consolidated Statement of Income

        The notional amount of these unfunded letters of credit was $1.9 billion as of March 31, 2007. The amount funded was insignificant and, accordingly, no amounts were 90 days past due or on non-accrual status at March 31, 2007.

        These items have been classified in Trading account assets or Trading account liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

Wikinvest © 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012. Use of this site is subject to express Terms of Service, Privacy Policy, and Disclaimer. By continuing past this page, you agree to abide by these terms. Any information provided by Wikinvest, including but not limited to company data, competitors, business analysis, market share, sales revenues and other operating metrics, earnings call analysis, conference call transcripts, industry information, or price targets should not be construed as research, trading tips or recommendations, or investment advice and is provided with no warrants as to its accuracy. Stock market data, including US and International equity symbols, stock quotes, share prices, earnings ratios, and other fundamental data is provided by data partners. Stock market quotes delayed at least 15 minutes for NASDAQ, 20 mins for NYSE and AMEX. Market data by Xignite. See data providers for more details. Company names, products, services and branding cited herein may be trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners. The use of trademarks or service marks of another is not a representation that the other is affiliated with, sponsors, is sponsored by, endorses, or is endorsed by Wikinvest.
Powered by MediaWiki