|
|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
This excerpt taken from the C 8-K filed Oct 13, 2009. Wachovia/Wells Fargo Litigation
On September 29, 2008, Citigroup Inc. announced that it had reached an agreement-in-principle to acquire all of the banking subsidiaries of Wachovia Corporation (Wachovia) in an open-bank transaction assisted by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. On October 3, 2008, Wachovia announced that it had entered into an agreement with Wells Fargo & Co. (Wells Fargo) for Wells Fargo to purchase Wachovia. Since October 4, 2008, litigation has been instigated by all three parties and others in various courts, including the New York State Supreme Court and the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. In this litigation, Citigroup seeks compensatory and punitive damages from Wachovia and Wells Fargo and their respective directors and advisors on various claims, including violation of a binding exclusivity agreement (the Exclusivity Agreement) between Citigroup and Wachovia; tortious interference with the Exclusivity Agreement; and unjust enrichment. Wachovia and Wells Fargo seek, among other relief, a declaration that the Wells Fargo-Wachovia transaction is valid and proper and not prohibited by the Exclusivity Agreement.
125
This excerpt taken from the C 10-Q filed Aug 7, 2009. Wachovia/Wells Fargo Litigation On July 13, 2009, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York ruled that Section 126(c) of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 bars the enforcement of the Citigroup-Wachovia Exclusivity Agreement in connection with the Wachovia-Wells Fargo transaction. Citi plans to pursue further proceedings in this litigation, including an appeal of the court's ruling. These excerpts taken from the C 10-K filed Feb 27, 2009. Wachovia/Wells Fargo Litigation On September 29, 2008, Citigroup Inc. announced that it had reached an agreement-in-principle to acquire all of the banking subsidiaries of Wachovia Corporation (Wachovia) in an open-bank transaction assisted by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. On October 3, 2008, Wachovia announced that it had entered into an agreement with Wells Fargo & Co. (Wells Fargo) for Wells Fargo to purchase Wachovia. Since October 4, 2008, litigation has been instigated by all three parties and others in various courts, including the New York State Supreme Court and the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. In this litigation, Citigroup seeks compensatory and punitive damages from Wachovia and Wells Fargo and their respective directors and advisors on various claims, including violation of a binding exclusivity agreement (the Exclusivity Agreement) between Citigroup and Wachovia; tortious interference with the Exclusivity Agreement; and unjust enrichment. Wachovia and Wells Fargo seek, among other relief, a declaration that the Wells Fargo-Wachovia transaction is valid and proper and not prohibited by the Exclusivity Agreement. Wachovia/Wells Fargo Litigation On September 29, 2008, Citigroup Inc. announced that it had reached an agreement-in-principle to acquire all of the banking subsidiaries of Wachovia Corporation (Wachovia) in an open-bank transaction assisted by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. On October 3, 2008, Wachovia announced that it had entered into an agreement with Wells Fargo & Co. (Wells Fargo) for Wells Fargo to purchase Wachovia. Since October 4, 2008, litigation has been instigated by all three parties and others in various courts, including the New York State Supreme Court and the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. In this litigation, Citigroup seeks compensatory and punitive damages from Wachovia and Wells Fargo and their respective directors and advisors on various claims, including violation of a binding exclusivity agreement (the Exclusivity Agreement) between Citigroup and Wachovia; tortious interference with the Exclusivity Agreement; and unjust enrichment. Wachovia and Wells Fargo seek, among other relief, a declaration that the Wells Fargo-Wachovia transaction is valid and proper and not prohibited by the Exclusivity Agreement. This excerpt taken from the C 10-Q filed Oct 31, 2008. Wachovia/Wells Fargo Litigation On September 29, 2008, Citigroup Inc. announced that it had reached an agreement-in-principle to acquire all of the banking subsidiaries of Wachovia Corporation ("Wachovia") in an open-bank transaction assisted by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. On October 3, 2008, Wachovia announced that it had entered into an agreement with Wells Fargo & Co. ("Wells Fargo") for Wells Fargo to purchase Wachovia. Since October 4, 2008, litigation has been instigated by all three parties and others in various courts, including the New York State Supreme Court and the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. In this litigation, Citigroup seeks compensatory and punitive damages from Wachovia and Wells Fargo and their respective directors and advisors on various claims, including violation of a binding exclusivity agreement (the "Exclusivity Agreement") between Citigroup and Wachovia; tortious interference with the Exclusivity Agreement; and unjust enrichment. Wachovia and Wells Fargo seek, among other relief, a declaration that the proposed Wells Fargo-Wachovia transaction is valid and proper and not prohibited by the Exclusivity Agreement and an injunction barring Citigroup from taking any steps to interfere with or impede the Wells Fargo-Wachovia transaction. | EXCERPTS ON THIS PAGE:
RELATED TOPICS for C: |
| |||||||