CommScope (CTV)

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

x        ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005

OR

o         TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from              to             

 

Commission file number: 001-12929

CommScope, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: NONE

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No x

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer or a non-accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2). Large accelerated filer x        Accelerated filer o        Non-accelerated filer o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2). Yes o No x

The aggregate market value of the shares of Common Stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant was approximately $940 million as of June 30, 2005 (based on the closing price for the Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange on that date). For purposes of this computation, shares held by affiliates and by directors and officers of the Registrant have been excluded.

As of February 17, 2006 there were 56,615,704 shares of the Registrant’s Common Stock outstanding.

Documents Incorporated by Reference
Portions of the Registrant’s Proxy Statement for the 2006 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are
incorporated by reference in Part III hereof.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

i

PART     I

Unless the context otherwise requires, references to “CommScope, Inc.,” “CommScope,” or “we,” “us,” or “our” are to CommScope, Inc. and its direct and indirect subsidiaries, on a consolidated basis.

This Form 10-K includes “Forward-looking Statements” within the meaning of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and related laws. These forward-looking statements are identified, including without limitation, by their use of such terms and phrases as “intends,” “intend,” “intended,” “goal,” “estimate,” “estimates,” “expects,” “expect,” “expected,” “project,” “projects,” “projected,” “projections,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “anticipated,” “should,” “think,” “thinks,” “designed to,” “foreseeable future,” “believe,” “believes” and “scheduled” and similar expressions. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date the statement was made. Item 1A of this Form 10-K sets forth more detailed information about the factors that may cause our actual results to differ, perhaps materially, from the views stated in such forward-looking statements. We do not intend, and are not undertaking any duty or obligation, to update any forward-looking statements to reflect developments or information obtained after the date of this Form 10-K.

ITEM 1.                BUSINESS

General

CommScope, Inc. is a world leader in the design and manufacture of cable and connectivity solutions for communications networks. We focus on the ‘last mile’ in communications networks, which is the distribution access, or final link to the customer. We believe we are a global leader in structured cabling for business enterprise applications and a global leader in broadband coaxial cables for the cable television industry. We also design, manufacture and market a broad line of high-performance electronic, coaxial and fiber optic cable products for data networking, Internet access, wireless communication, telephony and other broadband applications. In addition, we are an industry leader in the design and manufacture of environmentally secure enclosures to integrate complex equipment for digital subscriber line (DSL) and Fiber-to-the-Node (FTTN) deployments by telecommunication service providers in the United States.

We are a global manufacturer, employing state-of-the-art processes in 12 manufacturing facilities on five continents. We sell our products directly to customers and through a global network of distributors, system integrators and value-added resellers. We sell our products in more than 120 countries.

CommScope, Inc. was incorporated in Delaware on January 28, 1997.

For the year ended December 31, 2005, our revenues were $1.34 billion and our net income was $50.0 million. Historically, our operating performance is typically weaker during the first and fourth quarters and stronger during the second and third quarters. For further discussion of our current and prior year domestic and international revenues, see Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and the Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Form 10-K.

Our Acquisition of Connectivity Solutions

On January 31, 2004, we acquired the Connectivity Solutions business (Connectivity Solutions) from Avaya Inc. (Avaya). We acquired Connectivity Solutions primarily to expand our position in the ‘last mile’ of telecommunications, establish a leadership position in the global enterprise connectivity market and enhance our global growth opportunities. We believe that this complementary combination of our businesses creates the potential for significant synergies and positions us as a leading provider of cable products and apparatus to both the enterprise and telecommunications markets.

1

---

We acquired substantially all of the assets, subject to specified current liabilities, and also assumed approximately $65 million of other specified liabilities, primarily related to employee benefits, of Connectivity Solutions, for approximately $250 million in cash and approximately 1.8 million shares of our common stock valued at $32.4 million. The Connectivity Solutions business, as operated by Avaya, was organized into three product groups as follows:

·       SYSTIMAX®, which is a global leader in the design, development, manufacture and marketing of physical layer end-to-end structured cabling solutions for connecting telephones, workstations, local area networks (LANs), storage area networks and other critical communication devices through buildings or across campuses of businesses, enterprises and other organizations.

·       Integrated Cabinet Solutions (ICS), which provides secure environmental enclosures engineered to protect and optimize the performance of DSL, wireless and other electronic equipment, primarily in outdoor locations of telecommunications providers.

·       ExchangeMAX®, which is a provider of physical layer structured cabling solutions supporting central offices of telecommunications service providers in the U.S. We intend to exit the twisted pair telephone central office cable business, but retain the ExchangeMAX apparatus business.

Our historical financial information and other information given as of a date prior to January 31, 2004 reflects the business of CommScope prior to the acquisition of Connectivity Solutions, unless the context specifically requires otherwise. Financial and other information included in this Form 10-K relating to the Connectivity Solutions business as operated by Avaya for periods prior to the acquisition is not necessarily indicative of the future performance of the Connectivity Solutions business as operated by us. For a description of the factors affecting such future performance, see  Item 1A.

Strategy

Our strategic vision is to be the leading global developer, producer and seller of high-performance communications solutions for deployment by communication service providers and enterprise users. Our acquisition and the continuing integration of Connectivity Solutions are important milestones in achieving this objective. We strive to be recognized for the superior quality and performance of our products, outstanding service to our customers, excellence of our employees and value we deliver for our stockholders.

Our business strategy focuses on enhancing operational efficiency and internal growth from our existing businesses. We intend to enhance revenue growth by developing proprietary products and building upon our worldwide facilities and presence as well as our extensive global network of distributors, system integrators and value-added resellers. We will also consider opportunities for acquisitions, joint ventures or other investments that are a complementary fit strategically with our existing business. Our industry-leading research and development teams continue to spearhead innovative developments in cable and connectivity. We plan to build upon this legacy of innovation and leverage our portfolio of more than 1,300 worldwide patents and pending patent applications to provide leading-edge technology and new, high-performance cable and connectivity solutions products to our customers. We also intend to use our existing market channels to expand sales of our products.

We intend to improve efficiency by increasing operating focus, improving productivity and simplifying processes as we continue to integrate the Connectivity Solutions business. We also intend to maintain our emphasis on superior customer service, which we believe has helped us maintain our market leadership in enterprise and broadband applications.

2

---

Operating Segments

During 2003, our operations were conducted within one reportable business segment, based on the similarity of products, production processes, distribution methods and regulatory environment. During 2004, as a result of the acquisition of Connectivity Solutions, we reported results for two business segments: the Cable segment (53% of sales), which was the same as CommScope’s cable business prior to the acquisition of Connectivity Solutions, and the Connectivity Solutions segment (47% of sales), which was the acquired Connectivity Solutions business.

During 2005, as a result of the continued integration of the Connectivity Solutions business into our global operations and financial reporting systems, management changed the reportable segments used to evaluate results of operations. The new reportable segments are defined by major product category as follows: Enterprise, Broadband and Carrier. Results for prior periods have been restated to conform to the new reportable segments. Amounts reported for 2005 and 2004 include the results of the Connectivity Solutions business for the applicable periods since January 31, 2004, the date of the acquisition.

Net revenues are allocated among the reportable segments as follows:

 

See Note 18 in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Form 10-K for certain segment and geographic financial data relating to our business.

Enterprise

The Enterprise segment includes SYSTIMAX Solutions, which was acquired as part of the Connectivity Solutions acquisition, and Uniprise SolutionsÔ, previously referred to as the LAN product line. Through these brands, we believe we are the leading global provider of structured cabling systems for business enterprise applications. A structured cabling system is the transmission network inside a building or campus of buildings that connects voice and data communication devices, video and building automation devices, switching equipment and other information management systems to one another as well as to outside communications networks. It includes all the in-building and outside plant campus cabling and associated distribution components from the point of demarcation where the building or campus cabling connects to outside communications networks. A structured cabling system consists of various components, including transmission media (cable), circuit administration hardware, connectors, jacks, plugs, adapters, transmission electronics, electrical protection devices, wireless access devices and support hardware. Cables are classified by their construction, their data transmission capability and the environments in which they can be installed. Components are used to build elements, each having a specific purpose that allows easy implementation, moves, changes and maintenance as customer requirements change. A well-designed distribution system is independent of the equipment it serves and is capable of interconnecting many different devices, including computer and peripheral equipment, analog and digital telephones, personal computers and servers.

We believe that business enterprises are faced with a growing need for higher bandwidth connectivity solutions as network traffic and the number of network devices increases. Applications such as storage area networks, streaming audio/video, multi-site collaboration, database downloads, grid computing and large file transfers create an increasing demand for bandwidth and higher-performance structured cabling

3

---

systems. While the rate of technology adoption or application development is difficult to predict, we believe that desktop bandwidth growth should continue to increase.

Broadband

We design, manufacture and market coaxial and fiber optic cable, most of which is used in the cable television industry. We are the world’s largest manufacturer of coaxial cable and a leading domestic supplier of fiber optic cable for cable television and other video applications. Our coaxial and fiber optic cables are primarily used in Hybrid Fiber Coaxial (HFC) networks being deployed throughout the world. HFC networks utilize a combination of fiber optic and coaxial cable and are widely recognized as one of the most cost-effective ways to offer multi-channel video, voice and data services. Our broadband coaxial cables and zero water peak optical fiber cables provide bandwidth connectivity for services such as cable television, video on demand, high-speed Internet access, cable telephony and other interactive services.

Many other specialized markets or applications are served by multiple cable media such as coaxial, twisted pair, fiber optic or combinations of each. We are a leading producer of composite cables made of flexible coaxial and twisted copper pairs for full service communications providers worldwide. We also provide a variety of cable-in-conduit products for telecommunication applications.

Carrier

We also sell a variety of other solutions and products, including secure environmental enclosures, cables and components used by wireless providers to connect antennae to transmitters and structured cabling solutions for telephone central offices. These products are primarily used by telecommunication service providers or “carriers.”

Our ICS products are sturdy environmental enclosures for electronic devices and equipment deployed in the outside plant and inside buildings. Enclosures are designed to meet the needs of each customer, including thermal characteristics, and are used mostly by carriers to protect wireless equipment, transmission access equipment, switching equipment and broadband electronic equipment. Each cabinet is assembled, completely wired and system-tested to ensure high quality and ease of installation. We believe that we are a leading provider of environmental enclosures for domestic DSL and FTTN applications of telecommunications Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) and carriers.

Our wireless products include innovative, high frequency cables and components that connect wireless antennae to their transmitters. Semi-flexible coaxial cables are used to connect the antennae located at the top of wireless antenna towers to the radios and power sources located adjacent to or near the antenna site. Over the past few years, we developed and patented Cell ReachÔ, a line of smooth-wall copper or aluminum shielded semi-flexible coaxial cables and related connectors and accessories to address this market. Cell Reach has been installed in thousands of wireless base stations with leading service providers.

We also manufacture other broadband coaxial cables, fiber optic cables and twisted pair cables that are used for various wireless applications, including Third Generation Wireless (3G), Personal Communications Systems (PCS), Global System for Mobile Communications (GSM), Universal Mobile Telecommunications Systems (UMTS), Cellular, Multichannel Multipoint Distribution Service (MMDS), Local Multipoint Distribution System (LMDS), land mobile radio, paging, automotive and in-building wireless applications.

Our ExchangeMAX structured cabling systems are primarily deployed in U.S. central offices of telephone service providers. The ExchangeMAX solution combines our family of central office connectivity products with an overall system architecture to support the copper cable distribution networks of a central office. Our products include Unshielded Twisted Pair (UTP), shielded twisted pair and coaxial cable, copper main distributing frames, digital signal cross connect frames, connectors, patch cords and

4

---

cable management software. We manufacture and market the ExchangeMAX product line primarily to OEMs, telecommunication service providers and third-party vendors in the U.S. We have decided to exit the telephone central office cable business as we do not believe it is likely that it will generate acceptable future returns. We intend to retain the ExchangeMAX apparatus business.

Manufacturing

Most of our manufacturing facilities have received IS0 9000 certification, the most widely recognized standard for quality management. In addition, several of our facilities have the TL 9000 certification, which is a telecommunications specific standard for quality management. We employ a global manufacturing strategy and operate 12 manufacturing facilities located domestically in Nebraska, North Carolina, Alabama and Nevada and internationally in Seneffe, Belgium; Jaguariuna, Brazil; Bray, Ireland; Brisbane, Australia; and Suzhou, China, which became operational in mid-2005.

Communications Cables

We employ numerous advanced cable manufacturing processes. Many of these processes, some of which are proprietary and/or include trade secret information, are performed on equipment that has been modified for our purposes or specifically built to our specifications, often internally in our own machine shop facilities. These manufacturing processes include bimetallic wire fabrication, fine wire drawing, thermoplastic extrusion for insulating wires and cables, high-speed welding and swaging of metallic shields or outer conductors, braiding, cabling and stranding, and automated testing. Our manufacturing operations have a significant level of vertical integration. We outsource compounding and fabrication of selected materials when cost-effective.

Apparatus Devices

Apparatus devices support a complete systems solution. These products include jacks, outlets, panels, cords, connectors, protectors and network management tools. The manufacture of a typical part includes the following steps: molding of the parts, stamping metal parts, forming of sheet metal parts, insertion of printed wiring boards, assembly, wire wrapping, labeling and packaging. These products are composed of various plastics, stamped metal components and purchased assembled components.

Solutions Approach

We utilize a unique, top-down systems approach to developing structured cabling systems. This approach is supported by modal decomposition and simulation techniques developed by our laboratories. Modal Decomposition Modeling is a sophisticated measurement and modeling tool to analyze the hundreds of interactions present in multi-conductor transmission systems. We believe that this proprietary tool increases measurement accuracy and can effectively cascade individual components mathematically into a link or a channel. After collection of the modal data for a large number of individual components, through a mathematical process we can simulate a link or channel as if all components were physically connected. We believe that this modeling tool allows us a more comprehensive understanding of the properties of a cabling channel than our competitors. In addition, we are better able to identify weak links and refine components for system tuning and optimization. With this optimization, a UTP cabling system can sustain speeds in the multi-gigabit range without radical new design. We believe that our unique tools help us create better-structured cabling solutions, deliver best-in-class total system performance and maintain a strong competitive position globally.

5

---

Integrated Cabinets

An integrated cabinet starts with base metal sheets that are stamped or cut and then formed to specification. These parts are then treated and sealed in a dry paint line process. The metal parts are then assembled and engineered around specific power and thermodynamic components and designs, some of which are developed internally and others of which are purchased from third party providers. A base line cabinet can then be assembled using cable or apparatus products and integrated to high-end electronic devices as provided by the end user drawings.

Cost Reduction Initiatives

In order to improve the long-term competitive position of our business, we initiated major restructuring initiatives in 2005 and 2004.

The purpose of the 2005 initiative, which began in the third quarter, is to reduce costs by improving manufacturing efficiency, primarily for our Enterprise and Broadband segment cable operations. This includes shifting production among our global manufacturing facilities and the closing of the Scottsboro, Alabama facility in late 2006. Implementation of this initiative is expected to be substantially completed by the end of 2006.

During the fourth quarter of 2004, Connectivity Solutions Manufacturing, Inc. (CSMI), our wholly-owned manufacturing subsidiary, adopted organizational and cost-reduction initiatives at its Omaha, Nebraska facility. The primary components of this restructuring are: a) a reorganized management structure that creates more focused stand-alone management organizations for cable, apparatus and cabinets, b) re-engineered, simplified business practices and manufacturing processes and c) a reduced number of management, production and support personnel. Implementation of this initiative was substantially completed by the middle of 2005.

See Note 6 in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Form 10-K for additional detail about the restructuring costs recognized and expected future costs related to these initiatives.

Restructured Relationship with Furukawa

From November 2001 through June 2004 we owned a minority equity interest in OFS BrightWave, LLC (OFS BrightWave), one of the world’s largest manufacturers of optical fiber and fiber optic cable. OFS BrightWave was formed by us and The Furukawa Electric Co., Ltd. (Furukawa) to operate certain fiber optic cable and transmission fiber assets of the Optical Fiber Solutions Group acquired from Lucent Technologies Inc. in 2001. The remaining equity interest in OFS BrightWave was owned by an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Furukawa.

Primarily as a result of the continuing weakness in the global fiber optic cable market and Furukawa’s efforts to restructure the OFS BrightWave operations, we agreed with Furukawa to amend our contractual arrangements in the second quarter of 2004 for the mutual benefit of both companies. In June 2004, we exercised our contractual right to sell and sold our 9.4% equity ownership interest in OFS BrightWave to Furukawa in exchange for the 7,656,900 shares of our common stock owned by Furukawa. We hold these shares as treasury stock. As a result of this transaction, we no longer own any equity interest in OFS BrightWave.

This transaction does not affect our right to receive full payment from OFS BrightWave under an existing $30 million loan, which is scheduled to mature in late 2006. In conjunction with the sale of our ownership interest in OFS BrightWave, we fully impaired the remaining balance of this loan due to market conditions and because we no longer had an equity ownership in OFS BrightWave. The impairment loss

6

---

was included in the net gain on sale in our 2004 consolidated statement of operations. OFS BrightWave has continued to make interest payments in accordance with the terms of the original loan agreement.

We recorded a net pretax gain during the second quarter of 2004 of $121.3 million ($76.4 million net of tax or $1.13 per diluted share), as a result of this transaction. For more information about this transaction, see Note 5 in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Form 10-K.

In addition, we agreed with an affiliate of Furukawa to continue our existing optical fiber supply relationship by entering into a new four-year supply agreement that expires June 2008. We will continue to have access to a broad array of technologically advanced optical fibers as well as a cross-license agreement for key intellectual property.

Research and Development

Our research and development (R&D) expenditures for the creation and application of new and improved products and processes were $31.3 million, $29.3 million and $6.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The increase in R&D in 2005 and 2004 over 2003 is primarily the result of our acquisition of the Connectivity Solutions business. In connection with this acquisition we gained over 100 research and development professionals who focus on product development and enhancements and manufacturing processes related to Connectivity Solutions products. During 2005 and 2004, our major R&D activities related to developing new enterprise structured cabling solutions as well as more cost effective designs for cables, apparatus and cabinets.

Many of our professionals maintain a presence in standards-setting organizations so that our products can be formulated to achieve broad market acceptance. These organizations include the Telecommunications Industry Association, the Electronic Industry Association, the Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers, the Society of Cable Telecommunications Engineers and the International Standards Organization.

Sales and Distribution

We market our products directly to telecommunication service providers and through an extensive global network of distributors, system integrators and value-added resellers. We support our sales organization with regional service centers in locations around the world. A key aspect of our North American customer support and distribution system is the use of our private truck fleet, which primarily serves our Broadband segment customers. We believe that our ability to offer rapid delivery services, materials management and logistics services to customers in the continental U.S. utilizing our private truck fleet is an important competitive advantage.

Our Broadband segment products are primarily sold directly to cable television system operators. According to the National Cable & Telecommunications Association, the five largest cable television system operators account for nearly 70% of the cable television subscribers in the United States. The major cable television system operators include such companies as Comcast Corporation (Comcast), Time Warner Inc., Charter Communications, Inc., Cox Communications, Inc. and Adelphia Communications Corporation (Adelphia). Although we sell to a wide variety of customers dispersed across many different geographic areas, sales to the five largest domestic broadband service providers represented 17%, 18% and 39% of our net sales during 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Sales to Comcast accounted for 18% of our net sales for the year ended December 31, 2003. No other Broadband customer accounted for 10% or more of our net sales during 2005, 2004 or 2003.

Our Enterprise segment products are sold to customers primarily through independent distributors, system integrators and value-added resellers. During 2005 and 2004, sales of enterprise products to the top

7

---

five distributors, system integrators and value-added resellers represented 45% and 50%, respectively, of our consolidated net sales. During 2005 and 2004, Anixter International and its affiliates (Anixter) accounted for 32% and 35%, respectively, of our net sales. No other enterprise customer accounted for more than 10% of our net sales during 2005 or 2004. Selling products through distributors has associated risks, including, without limitation, that sales can be negatively affected on a short-term basis as a result of changes in inventory levels maintained by distributors; these inventory changes may be unrelated to the purchasing trends by the ultimate customer.

We believe the enterprise structured cabling market has three segments: premium, mid-tier and basic. Products in the premium segment consist of end-to-end solutions created from cable, connectors and components that are specifically designed for compatibility to provide cutting-edge performance and best-in-class system transmission. Products in the mid-tier segment generally consist of value-oriented solutions based on established technology or cable that is matched with connectors from a variety of manufacturers. Products in the basic segment consist of lower performance cables typically used for telephone wiring or lower speed networks.

We deploy a two-tier strategy to address different market needs with our enterprise brands. Our SYSTIMAX branded products focus on the premium segment and are purchased primarily by large, multinational companies. Our Uniprise branded products focus on the middle-tier market and are purchased primarily by large and medium sized enterprises in the U.S.

We sell our Carrier segment products both directly and through distribution, primarily to large, domestic telecommunication service providers and OEMs. Our customer service and engineering groups maintain particularly close working relationships with these carrier customers due to the significant amount of design and customization associated with some of these products.

Our international sales consist primarily of our Enterprise and Broadband segment products. Our primary channels to international markets are through distributors and direct sales to end users and OEMs. We support our international sales efforts with sales representatives based in Europe, Latin America, Asia/Pacific Rim and other regions throughout the world. Our net sales from international operations were $450.4 million, $373.7 million and $110.8 million during 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

The effect of changes in the relative value of currencies on our results of operations may be favorable or unfavorable. We sometimes engage in foreign currency hedging transactions to mitigate these effects. For more information about our foreign currency exposure management, see Note 11 in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Form 10-K.

Patents and Trademarks

We pursue an active policy of seeking intellectual property protection, namely patents and registered trademarks, for new products and designs. As of December 31, 2005, on a worldwide basis, we held over 1,300 patents and pending patent applications, including those we acquired as part of the Connectivity Solutions acquisition. As of December 31, 2005, we also had over 700 registered trademarks and pending trademark applications worldwide. We consider our patents and trademarks to be valuable assets, but no single patent or trademark is material to our operations as a whole. We intend to rely on our intellectual property rights, including our proprietary knowledge, trade secrets and continuing technological innovation, to develop and maintain our competitive position. We have and will continue to protect certain key intellectual property rights.

We have entered into cross-licensing arrangements with Furukawa, providing us with access to key technology for communications cables, especially fiber optic cables.

8

---

Backlog

At December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, we had an order backlog of $81 million, $91 million and $24 million, respectively. Orders typically fluctuate from quarter to quarter based on customer demand and general business conditions. Backlog includes only orders for products scheduled to be shipped within six months. In some cases, unfilled orders may be canceled prior to shipment of goods; but cancellations historically have not been material. However, our current order backlog may not be indicative of future demand.

Competition

The market for cable products and structured cabling systems is highly competitive and subject to rapid technological change. We encounter competition in substantially all areas of our business and from both international and domestic companies. Our competitors include large, diversified companies, some of which have substantially greater assets and financial resources than we do, as well as medium to small companies. We also face competition from certain smaller companies that have concentrated their efforts in one or more areas of the Broadband, Enterprise or Carrier markets. Some of our representative competitors by segment include: Enterprise—ADC Telecommunications, Inc., Belden CDT, Inc., Corning Incorporated, General Cable Corp., Ortronics, Inc., Nexans SA, Panduit Corp. and Tyco Electronics Corporation; Broadband—Amphenol Corporation, Corning Incorporated and Pirelli & C. SpA; Carrier—Alcatel, ADC Telecommunications, Inc., Andrew Corporation, Eupen Cable, Inc. and Emerson Electric Co.

We compete primarily on the basis of product specifications, quality, price, engineering, customer service and delivery time. We believe that we have a strong competitive position in the Broadband segment markets due to our position as a low-cost, high-volume cable producer and reputation as a high-quality provider of state-of-the-art cables with a strong orientation toward customer service. We believe that our structured cabling systems have a strong competitive position in the Enterprise segment markets because of long-standing relationships with distributors, system integrators and value-added resellers, strong brand recognition and premium product features and reliability. We believe that the ICS and wireless products within our Carrier segment are able to compete effectively in these markets based on strong technological capabilities and customer relationships.

Raw Materials

Our manufacturing operations are process oriented and we use significant quantities of various raw materials, including plastics and other polymers, fluoropolymers, fabricated aluminum, bimetals, copper, optical fiber and steel, among others. Fluorinated ethylene propylene is the primary raw material used throughout the industry for producing flame-retarding cables for LAN applications in North America. We use fabricated aluminum, copper and steel in the manufacture of coaxial and twisted pair cables. Most of these metal materials are purchased under supply arrangements with some portion of the unit pricing indexed to commodity market prices for these metals. We have adopted a hedging policy pursuant to which we may, from time to time, purchase physical inventory or attempt to match futures contracts or option contracts for a specific metal with some portion of the anticipated metal purchases for the same periods. Optical fiber is a primary raw material used for making fiber optic cables.

Our profitability may be materially affected by changes in the market price of our raw materials, most of which are linked to the commodity markets. Prices for copper, fluoropolymers and certain polymers derived from oil and natural gas have increased substantially over the past two years. As a result, we have increased our prices for certain Enterprise and Broadband segment products and may have to increase prices again in the future. Our inability to recover costs through increased prices could have a material adverse impact on the results of our operations.

9

---

Environment

We are subject to various federal, state, local and foreign environmental laws and regulations governing, among other things, discharges to air and water, management of hazardous substances, the handling and disposal of solid and hazardous waste, and the investigation and remediation of hazardous substance contamination. Because of the nature of our business, we have incurred, and will continue to incur, costs relating to compliance with these environmental laws and regulations. Compliance with current laws and regulations has not had and is not expected to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition. However, new laws and regulations, including those regulating the types of substances allowable in certain of our products, stricter enforcement of existing laws and regulations, the discovery of previously unknown contamination or the imposition of new remediation or discharge requirements could require us to incur costs or become the basis for new or increased liabilities that could have a material adverse effect on our business. Our Enterprise segment cable products and many of our Broadband segment cable products are compliant with the European Union Directive on Restriction of Hazardous Substances (RoHS) in electrical and electronic equipment and we intend that the balance of our products subject to the directive will be compliant prior to the July 1, 2006 effective date.

Pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act and similar state statutes, current or former owners or operators of a contaminated property, as well as companies that generated, disposed of, or arranged for the disposal of hazardous substances at a contaminated property, can be held jointly and severally liable for the costs of investigation and remediation of the contaminated property, regardless of fault. Certain of our owned facilities, including the Omaha facility of CSMI acquired in the Connectivity Solutions acquisition, are the subject of ongoing investigation and/or remediation of hazardous substance contamination in the soil and/or groundwater. Costs relating to these investigations or remediation activities are being indemnified by prior owners and operators of these facilities. Based on currently available information and the availability of indemnification, we do not believe that the costs associated with these contaminated sites will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations. However, our present and former facilities have or had been in operation for many years and, over such time, these facilities have used substances or generated and disposed of wastes that are or may be considered hazardous. Therefore, it is possible that environmental liabilities may arise in the future which we cannot now predict.

Employees

As of December 31, 2005, we employed approximately 4,400 people. The majority of our employees are located in the U.S., but we also have employees in foreign countries, including Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Ireland, Singapore, China and The Netherlands.

CSMI has collective bargaining agreements with the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW), Locals 1614 and 1974. In connection with our acquisition of Connectivity Solutions, CSMI assumed these agreements, with modifications, effective January 31, 2004. These collective bargaining agreements that expire on May 31, 2006 govern the pay, benefits and working conditions for approximately 715 production, maintenance and clerical employees represented by the two IBEW Locals. In February 2006, the IBEW Local representing the production and maintenance employees ratified a new agreement that will be in effect from June 1, 2006 through December 31, 2008.

We believe that our relations with our employees and unions are satisfactory.

Available Information

Our website (www.commscope.com) contains frequently updated information about us and our operations. Our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on Form 10-K, Form 10-Q and Form 8-K and all amendments to those reports can be viewed and downloaded free of charge as soon

10

---

as reasonably practicable after the reports and amendments are electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC by accessing www.commscope.com and clicking on Investor Relations/News and then clicking on SEC Filings.

New York Stock Exchange Annual CEO Certification

Our common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange. In accordance with New York Stock Exchange rules, on June 1, 2005 we filed the annual certification by our CEO that, as of the date of the certification, he was unaware of any violation by CommScope of the New York Stock Exchange’s corporate governance listing standards.

ITEM 1A.        RISK FACTORS

The Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and other related laws provide a “safe harbor” for forward-looking statements. Our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, our Annual Report to Stockholders, any Form 10-Q or Form 8-K of ours, or any other oral or written statements made by us or on our behalf, may include forward-looking statements which reflect our current views with respect to future events and financial performance. These forward-looking statements are identified by their use of such terms and phrases as “intends,” “intend,” “intended,” “goal,” “estimate,” “estimates,” “expects,” “expect,” “expected,” “project,” “projects,” “projected,” “projections,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “anticipated,” “should,” “think,” “thinks,” “designed to,” “foreseeable future,” “believe,” “believes,” “scheduled” and similar expressions. This list of indicative terms and phrases is not intended to be all-inclusive. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date the statement was made. We do not intend, and are not undertaking any duty or obligation, to update any forward-looking statements to reflect developments or information obtained after the date of this Form 10-K.

Our actual results may differ significantly from the results discussed in forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause such a difference include, but are not limited to (a) the general political, military, economic and competitive conditions in the United States and other markets where we operate; (b) changes in capital availability or costs, such as changes in interest rates, market perceptions of the industry in which we operate, security ratings or general stock market fluctuations; (c) workforce factors; (d) authoritative generally accepted accounting principles or policy changes from such standard-setting bodies as the Financial Accounting Standards Board, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC); (e) the impact of corporate governance, accounting and securities law reforms by the United States Congress, the SEC and the New York Stock Exchange; (f) risks related to production and inventory, including warranty costs, obsolescence charges, excess capacity and material and labor costs; and (g) the factors set forth below.

We are dependent on a limited number of key customers or distributors for a substantial portion of the net sales in each of our business segments.

Within each of our business segments, a limited number of key customers or distributors account for a substantial portion of our net sales:

Enterprise

We distribute enterprise and certain other products through a worldwide network of more than 2,000 distributors, system integrators and value-added resellers. For the year ended December 31, 2005, sales of such products to the top three distributors, system integrators and value-added resellers represented approximately 42% of our consolidated net sales. In particular, Anixter International Inc. and affiliates accounted for approximately 32% of our consolidated net sales during such period.

11

Broadband

Although the domestic cable television industry is comprised of thousands of cable systems, a small number of cable television operators own a majority of cable television systems and account for a majority of the capital expenditures made by cable television operators. Although we sell to a wide variety of customers dispersed across many different geographic areas, sales of our broadband products to the five largest domestic cable television operators represented approximately 17% of our consolidated net sales for the year ended December 31, 2005.

Carrier

Sales of carrier products are concentrated among a limited number of large telecommunication service providers.

The concentration of our net sales among these key customers or distributors subjects us to a variety of risks that could have a material adverse impact on our net sales and profitability, including, without limitation:

·       loss of one or more of our key customers or distributors, including failure to renegotiate new distributor agreements;

·       financial difficulties experienced by one or more of our key customers resulting in reduced purchases of our products and/or uncollectible accounts receivable balances;

·       reductions in inventory levels held by distributors, which may be unrelated to purchasing trends by the ultimate customer;

·       consolidations in the cable television and/or telecommunications industry could result in delays in purchasing decisions, or reduced purchases, by the merged businesses;

·       the cable television and telecommunications industry are each subject to significant  government regulation and implementation of new or existing laws or regulations could impact capital spending plans and, therefore, adversely impact our business;

·       increases in the cost of capital and/or reductions in the amount of capital available to the cable television and telecommunications industry could reduce the level of their capital spending and, therefore, adversely impact our business;

·       reductions in the level of capital spending in the corporate information technology sector could have an adverse impact on sales of our enterprise products;

·       reductions in the level of spending on network maintenance and/or capital improvements by cable television and/or telecommunications customers could have an adverse impact on our sales of broadband and/or carrier products; and

·       competition for cable television operators from satellite and wireless television providers, telephone companies or others could result in lower capital spending and have an adverse impact on our sale of broadband products.

We face competitive pressures with respect to all of our major products.

In each of our major product groups, we compete with a substantial number of foreign and domestic companies, some of which have greater resources (financial or otherwise), or lower operating costs, than we have. The rapid technological changes occurring in the telecommunications industry could lead to the entry of new competitors. Existing competitors’ actions, such as price reductions or introduction of new innovative products, use of internet auctions by customers or competitors, and new entrants may have a

12

---

material adverse impact on our sales and profitability. We cannot assure you that we will continue to compete successfully with our existing competitors or that we will be able to compete successfully with new competitors.

Fiber optic technology presents a potential substitute for some of the communications cable products we sell. A significant decrease in the cost of fiber optic systems could make these systems superior on a price/performance basis to copper systems. A significant decrease in the cost of fiber optic systems would reasonably be expected to have a materially adverse effect on our coaxial and twisted pair cable sales.

There are various complementary and competitive wireless technologies that could be a potential substitute for some of the communications cable products we sell. A significant technological breakthrough or significant decrease in the cost of deploying these wireless technologies could have a material adverse effect on our cable sales.

Successful implementation and roll-out of product innovations is necessary to preserve customer relationships.

Many of our markets are characterized by advances in information processing and communications capabilities which require increased transmission speeds and greater capacity, or “bandwidth,” for carrying information. These advances require ongoing improvements in the capabilities of wire and cable products. We believe that our future success will depend in part upon our ability to enhance existing products and to develop and manufacture new products that meet or anticipate these changes. The failure to introduce successful new or enhanced products on a timely and cost-competitive basis or the inability to continue to market existing products on a cost-competitive basis could materially adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

Our dependence on commodities subjects us to price fluctuations and potential availability constraints which could materially adversely affect our profitability.

Our profitability may be materially affected by changes in the market price and availability of certain raw materials, most of which are linked to the commodity markets. The principal raw materials we purchase are plastics and other polymers, copper, steel, fabricated aluminum and optical fiber. Polymers are used to insulate and protect cables, and fabricated aluminum, copper and steel are used in the production of coaxial and twisted pair cables. Prices for copper, fluoropolymers and certain other polymers, derived from oil and natural gas, have been volatile as a result of increased global demand and supply disruptions. As a result, we have significantly increased our prices for certain products and may have to increase prices again in the future. Delays in implementing price increases and our inability to achieve market acceptance of future price increases could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations.

We are dependent on a limited number of key suppliers for certain raw materials.

For certain of our raw material purchases, including fluorinated ethylene propylene (FEP), copper rods, fine aluminum wire, steel and optical fiber, we are dependant on key suppliers.

FEP is the primary raw material used throughout the industry for producing flame-retarding cables for LAN applications. There are few worldwide producers of FEP and market supplies have been periodically limited over the past several years. Availability of adequate supplies of FEP will be critical to future LAN cable sales growth. If FEP is not available in adequate quantities on acceptable terms, our results of operations and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.

We internally produce a significant portion of our requirements for fine aluminum wire, which is available externally from only a limited number of suppliers. Our failure to manufacture or adequately expand our internal production of fine aluminum wire, and/or our inability to obtain these materials from

13

---

other sources in adequate quantities on acceptable terms, could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

Optical fiber is a primary material used for making fiber optic cables. There are few worldwide suppliers of the premium optical fibers we use in our products. Availability of adequate supplies of premium optical fibers will be critical to future fiber optic cable sales growth. We believe that our optical fiber supply arrangements with two suppliers address concerns about the continuing availability of these materials to us, although there can be no assurance of this.

Our key suppliers could experience financial difficulties, or there may be global shortages of the raw materials we use, and our inability to find sources of supply on reasonable terms could materially adversely affect our ability to manufacture products in a cost-effective way.

If our products or components purchased from our suppliers experience performance issues, our business will suffer.

Our business depends on our producing products of consistently high quality. To this end, our products, including components and raw materials purchased from our suppliers and completed goods purchased for resale, are rigorously tested for quality both by us and our customers. Nevertheless, our products are highly complex and our customers’ testing procedures are limited to evaluating our products under likely and foreseeable failure scenarios. For various reasons (including, among others, the occurrence of performance problems unforeseeable in testing), our products and components and raw materials purchased from our suppliers may fail to perform as expected. Performance issues could result from faulty design or problems in manufacturing. We have experienced such performance issues in the past and remain exposed to such performance issues. In some cases, recall of some or all affected products, product redesigns or additional capital equipment may be required to correct a defect. In addition, we warrant certain products for periods ranging from one to twenty-five years from the date of sale, depending upon the product subject to the warranty. In particular, we warrant the operation of our SYSTIMAX products for a period of 20 years from installation. In some cases, we indemnify our customers against damages or losses that might arise from certain claims relating to our products. Although historical warranty and indemnity claims have not been significant, we cannot assure you that future claims will not have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial position. Any significant or systemic product failure could also result in lost future sales of the affected product and other products, as well as customer relations problems.

If our integrated global manufacturing operations suffer production or shipping delays, we may experience difficulty in meeting customer demands.

We internally produce a significant portion of certain components used in our finished products, including bimetallic center conductors, braided core and fine aluminum wire, at certain of our manufacturing facilities. Disruption of our ability to produce at or distribute from these facilities due to failure of our technology, fire, electrical outage, natural disaster, acts of terrorism, shipping interruptions or some other catastrophic event could materially adversely affect our ability to manufacture products at our other manufacturing facilities in a cost-effective and timely manner.

We periodically realign manufacturing capacity among our global facilities in order to reduce costs by improving manufacturing efficiency and to improve our long-term competitive position. The implementation of these initiatives may include significant shifts of production capacity among facilities.

There are significant risks inherent in the implementation of these initiatives, including, but not limited to, ensuring that: there is adequate production capacity to meet customer demand while capacity is being shifted among facilities; there is no decrease in product quality occurs as a result of shifting capacity; adequate raw material and other service providers are available to meet the needs at the new production

14

---

locations; equipment can be successfully removed, transported and re-installed; and adequate supervisory, production and support personnel are available to accommodate the shifted production.

In the event that manufacturing realignment initiatives are not successfully implemented, we could experience lost future sales and increased operating costs as well as customer relations problems, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

Our significant international operations present economic, political and other risks.

We have a significant level of international manufacturing operations and international sales. We have manufacturing facilities in Belgium, China, Brazil, Ireland and Australia. For the year ended December 31, 2005, international sales represented approximately 34% of our net sales. Our international sales, manufacturing and distribution operations are subject to the risks inherent in operating abroad, including, but not limited to, risks with respect to currency exchange rates, economic and political destabilization, restrictive actions by foreign governments, nationalizations, the laws and policies of the United States affecting trade, foreign investment and loans, foreign tax laws, compliance with local laws and regulations, armed conflict, war, terrorism, shipping interruptions and major health concerns (such as infectious diseases).

We may not fully realize the anticipated savings from previously announced restructuring actions and may need to undertake further restructuring actions in the future.

We recognized pretax restructuring charges of $38.6 million during the year ended December 31, 2005. These charges were related to the global manufacturing initiative that commenced in the third quarter of 2005 and an organizational and cost reduction initiative that commenced in the fourth quarter of 2004. Implementation of these initiatives may take longer and be more costly than originally anticipated and the anticipated benefits may not be fully realized.

In response to general business conditions, the then current level of business and the outlook for future business, we may again need to initiate restructuring actions that could result in workforce reductions and incurring restructuring charges, which could be material.

We may need to recognize impairment charges related to fixed assets, amortizable intangible assets or goodwill or other intangible assets with indefinite lives.

We have recognized impairment charges in the past as a result of adverse changes in business conditions or in conjunction with restructuring activities. As a result of an event or a change in circumstances or through our periodic testing, we may, in the future, determine that one or more of our long-lived assets is impaired and that an impairment charge is required. Any such impairment charge could have a material effect on our results of operations and financial position.

We have significant unfunded obligations under employee benefit plans.

Significant changes to the assets and/or the liabilities related to our employee benefit obligations as a result of changes in actuarial estimates, asset performance or benefit changes, among others, could have a material impact on our financial position and results of operations.

In addition, legislative or regulatory changes could require us to fund a material portion of the obligation, which could have a material adverse impact on our financial flexibility.

We may not fully realize anticipated benefits from prior or future acquisitions or equity investments.

Although we expect to realize strategic, operational and financial benefits as a result of any acquisition or equity investment, we cannot predict whether and to what extent such benefits will be

15

---

achieved. There are significant challenges to integrating an acquired operation into our business, including, but not limited to:

·       successfully managing the operations, manufacturing facilities and technology;

·       maintaining and increasing the customer base;

·       retention of key employees, suppliers and distributors;

·       integrating management information, inventory, accounting and sales systems; and

·       addressing significant operating losses related to certain product lines.

We may incur costs and may not be successful in protecting our intellectual property and in defending claims that we are infringing on the intellectual property of others.

We may encounter difficulties, costs or risks in protecting our intellectual property rights or obtaining rights to additional intellectual property to permit us to continue or expand our business. Other companies, including some of our largest competitors, hold intellectual property rights in our industry and the intellectual property rights of others could inhibit our ability to introduce new products unless we secure licenses on commercially reasonable terms, as such are needed.

In addition, we have been required and may be required in the future to initiate litigation in order to enforce any patents issued or licensed to us or to determine the scope and/or validity of a third party’s patent or other proprietary rights. We also have been and may in the future be subject to lawsuits by third parties seeking to enforce their own intellectual property rights. Any such litigation, regardless of outcome, could subject us to significant liabilities or require us to cease using proprietary third party technology and, consequently, could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

In certain markets, we may be required to address counterfeit versions of our products. We may incur significant costs in pursuing the originators of such counterfeit products and, if we are unsuccessful in eliminating them from the market, may experience a diminution in the value of our products.

Our ability to obtain additional capital on commercially reasonable terms may be limited.

Although we believe cash from operations and availability under our senior secured revolving credit facility provide adequate resources to fund ongoing operating requirements, we may need to seek additional financing to compete effectively. Our public debt ratings affect our ability to raise capital and the cost of that capital. As of December 31, 2005, our corporate debt rating from Standard & Poor’s is BB. Future downgrades of our debt ratings may increase our borrowing costs and affect our ability to access the debt or equity capital markets on terms and in amounts that would be satisfactory to us.

If we are unable to obtain capital on commercially reasonable terms, it could:

·       reduce funds available to us for purposes such as working capital, capital expenditures, research and development, strategic acquisitions and other general corporate purposes;

·       restrict our ability to introduce new products or exploit business opportunities;

·       increase our vulnerability to economic downturns and competitive pressures in the industry we operate in;

·       limit our financial flexibility to finance a full or partial redemption of our $250 million aggregate principal amount of 1% convertible senior subordinated debentures; and

·       place us at a competitive disadvantage.

16

---

Additional indebtedness may be incurred in the future under the revolving facility that is part of our senior secured credit facility, through future debt issuance, through assumption of liabilities in connection with future acquisitions or otherwise.

A significant uninsured loss or a loss in excess of our insurance coverage could materially adversely affect our financial condition.

We maintain insurance covering our normal business operations, including fire, property and casualty protection that we believe is adequate. We do not generally carry insurance covering wars, acts of terrorism, earthquakes or other similar catastrophic events. Because insurance has generally become more expensive, we may not be able to obtain adequate insurance coverage on financially reasonable terms in the future. A significant uninsured loss or a loss in excess of our insurance coverage could materially adversely affect our financial condition.

Compliance with domestic and foreign environmental laws and potential environmental liabilities may have a material adverse impact.

We are subject to various federal, state, local and foreign environmental laws and regulations governing, among other things, discharges to air and water, management of hazardous substances, handling and disposal of solid and hazardous waste, and investigation and remediation of hazardous substance contamination. Because of the nature of our business, we have incurred and will continue to incur costs relating to compliance with these environmental laws and regulations. Compliance with current laws and regulations has not had and is not expected to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition. However, new laws and regulations, including those regulating the types of substances allowable in certain of our products, stricter enforcement of existing laws and regulations, the discovery of previously unknown contamination or the imposition of new remediation or discharge requirements could require us to incur costs or become the basis for new or increased liabilities that could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. For example, the European Union has issued new directives relating to hazardous substances contained in electrical and electronic equipment and the disposal of waste electrical and electronic equipment. If we are unable to comply with these and similar laws in other jurisdictions, it could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act and similar state statutes, current or former owners or operators of a contaminated property, as well as companies that generated, disposed of, or arranged for the disposal of hazardous substances at a contaminated property can be held jointly and severally liable for the costs of investigation and remediation of the contaminated property, regardless of fault. Our present and past facilities have been in operation for many years and over that time, in the course of those operations, these facilities have used substances or generated and disposed of wastes which are or might be considered hazardous. We have been indemnified by prior owners and operators of certain of these facilities for costs of investigation and/or remediation, but there can be no assurance that we will not ultimately be liable for some or all of these costs. Therefore, it is possible that environmental liabilities may arise in the future which we cannot now predict.

We may experience significant variability in our effective tax rate.

For the past three calendar years, our annual effective tax rate has ranged from 29.7% to 37.0%. Variability in the mix and profitability of domestic and international activities, identification and resolution of various tax uncertainties and the failure to realize tax benefits related to equity-based compensation may significantly impact our effective income tax rate in the future. A significant increase in our effective income tax rate could have a material impact on our results of operations.

17

---

ITEM 1B.       UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.

ITEM 2.     PROPERTIES

As of December 31, 2005, our principal administrative, production, and research and development facilities (including those owned by subsidiaries) were as follows:

(1)          Our interest in each of these properties is encumbered by a lien securing our existing senior secured credit facility (see Note 10 in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Form 10-K).

18

---

(2)          This facility is scheduled to be closed by the end of 2006 in conjunction with our global manufacturing initiative (see Note 6 in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Form 10-K).

(3)          This facility became operational in mid-2005 and is currently being expanded to 300,000 square feet. The expansion is scheduled to be completed in mid-2006.

(4)          Several buildings, comprising approximately 1.2 million square feet of this facility, are currently being actively marketed for sale.

We believe that our facilities and equipment generally are well maintained, in good condition and suitable for our purposes and adequate for our present operations. While we currently have excess manufacturing capacity in our facilities, utilization is subject to change based on customer demand. We can give no assurances that we will not continue to have excess manufacturing capacity over the long-term.

ITEM 3.                LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We are either a plaintiff or a defendant in pending legal matters in the normal course of business; however, management believes none of these legal matters will have a materially adverse effect on our business or financial condition upon their final disposition.

ITEM 4.                SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

No matters were submitted to a vote of our security holders during the three months ended December 31, 2005.

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

Set forth below is certain information with respect to the executive officers of the Company as of February 25, 2006.

19

---

 

20

---

 

 

21

PART II

ITEM 5.                MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER
MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Our common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol CTV. The following table sets forth the high and low sale prices as reported by the New York Stock Exchange for the periods indicated.

 

As of February 17, 2006, the approximate number of registered stockholders of record of our common stock was 550.

We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our common stock. We do not currently intend to pay cash dividends in the foreseeable future, but intend to reinvest earnings in our business. Certain of our debt agreements contain limits on our ability to pay cash dividends on our common stock.

22

---

ITEM 6.                SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The following table presents our historical selected financial data as of the dates and for the periods indicated. The data for each of the years presented are derived from our audited consolidated financial statements. The information set forth below should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included elsewhere in this Form 10-K. This financial data does not reflect financial information of the Connectivity Solutions business for periods prior to the acquisition on January 31, 2004 or pro forma information relating to the acquisition and the related financing, and therefore may not be indicative of our financial condition and performance for future periods.

Five-Year Summary of Selected Financial Data
(In thousands, except per share amounts)

 

 

23

ITEM 7.                MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion of our historical results of operations and financial condition should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included elsewhere in this Form 10-K. On January 31, 2004 we acquired the Connectivity Solutions business of Avaya. Historical financial and other information included in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for periods prior to January 31, 2004 reflects the business of CommScope prior to our acquisition of the Connectivity Solutions business, unless otherwise noted. Because the acquisition of the Connectivity Solutions business is significant to us, historical financial information for periods prior to the acquisition may not be indicative of our financial condition and performance for future periods.

OVERVIEW

CommScope, Inc. is a world leader in the design and manufacture of cable and connectivity solutions for communications networks. We focus on the ‘last mile’ in communications networks, which is the distribution access, or final link to the customer. Through our acquisition of the Connectivity Solutions business of Avaya on January 31, 2004, we became a global leader in structured cabling for business enterprise applications. We believe we are a global leader in broadband coaxial cables for the cable television industry. We are an industry leader in the design and manufacture of environmentally secure enclosures to integrate complex equipment for digital subscriber line (DSL) and Fiber-to-the-Node (FTTN) deployments by telecommunication service providers in the United States. We also design, manufacture and market a broad line of high-performance electronic, coaxial and fiber optic cable products for data networking, Internet access, wireless communication, telephony and other broadband applications.

During 2003, our operations were conducted within one reportable business segment, based on the similarity of products, production processes, distribution methods and regulatory environment. During 2004, as a result of the acquisition of Connectivity Solutions, management evaluated the results of operations in two reportable business segments: the Cable segment, which was the same as our cable business prior to the acquisition, and the Connectivity Solutions segment, which was the business acquired in January 2004. During 2005, as a result of the continued integration of the Connectivity Solutions business into our global operations and financial reporting systems, management changed the reportable segments used to evaluate results of operations. The new reportable segments are defined by major product category as follows: Enterprise, Broadband and Carrier. Information for prior periods has been restated based on the new segments.

Net sales for 2005 increased by $184.5 million or 16.0% to $1,337.2 million as compared to 2004, primarily due to strong sales growth internationally for our Enterprise segment products and domestically for our Carrier segment products as well as price increases for all of our major products. Operating income for 2005 increased to $74.9 million from $5.9 million in 2004, primarily due to an increase in gross margin to 25.8% during 2005 compared with 22.1% during 2004, a $13.2 million recovery of accounts receivable that had previously been written-off and various charges incurred during 2004 related to the Connectivity Solutions acquisition. Operating income for 2005 was negatively impacted by $38.6 million in restructuring costs, a $24.3 million increase over the restructuring costs recognized in 2004. Net income of $50.0 million for 2005 was lower than the $75.8 million reported for 2004 despite the increase in operating income, primarily due to the gain ($76.4 million, after-tax) from the sale of our interest in OFS BrightWave during 2004.

During the periods presented in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, the primary source of revenue from our Enterprise segment was sales of

24

---

structured cabling solutions to large, multinational companies, primarily through a global network of distributors, system integrators and value-added resellers. The segment also includes coaxial cable for various video and data applications, other than cable television. Demand for Enterprise segment products depends primarily on information technology spending by enterprises, such as communications projects in new buildings or campuses, building expansions or upgrades of network systems within buildings or campuses. The primary source of revenue for our Broadband segment was product sales to cable television system operators. Demand for our Broadband segment products depends primarily on capital spending by cable television system operators for maintaining, constructing and rebuilding or upgrading their systems. The primary source of revenue for our Carrier segment was sales of secure environmental enclosures for electronic devices and equipment. These products are used by wireline and wireless telecommunication service providers (carriers) and may be sold directly to the carriers or to Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) providing equipment to such carriers. The Carrier segment also derives revenue from the sale of cables and components used by wireless providers to connect antennae to transmitters. Demand for Carrier segment products depends primarily on capital spending by carriers to expand their distribution networks or increase the capacity of their networks.

Our future financial condition and performance will be largely dependent upon 1) global spending by business enterprises on information technology; 2) investment by telecommunication companies in the communications infrastructure; 3) overall global business conditions; 4) our ability to manage costs successfully as we implement our global manufacturing initiatives; and 5) the other factors set forth in Item 1A of this Form 10-K. Our profitability is also affected by the mix and volume of sales among our various product groups and between domestic and international customers and competitive pricing pressures. We have experienced significant increases in raw material prices during the past two years as a result of increased global demand and supply disruptions. We attempt to mitigate the risk of increases in raw material prices through effective requirements planning, working closely with key suppliers to obtain the best possible pricing and delivery terms and implementing price increases. To the extent that we are unable to pass on cost increases to customers without a significant decrease in sales, cost increases could have a material effect on our operations.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

This Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations includes a discussion and analysis of our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. These estimates and their underlying assumptions form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other objective sources. Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances and revises its estimates, as appropriate, when changes in events or circumstances indicate that revisions may be necessary.

The following significant accounting estimates reflected in our financial statements are based on management’s knowledge of and experience with past and current events and on management’s assumptions about future events. It is reasonably possible that they may ultimately differ materially from actual results.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts—We maintain allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated losses expected to result from the inability of our customers to make required payments. These estimates are based on management’s evaluation of the ability of our customers to make payments, focusing on customer financial difficulties and age of receivable balances. An adverse change in financial condition of a

25

---

significant customer or group of customers could materially affect management’s future estimates related to doubtful accounts.

Reserves for Sales Returns, Discounts, Allowances and Rebates and Distributor Price Protection Reserves—We record estimated reductions to revenue for potential sales returns as well as customer programs and incentive offerings, such as discounts, allowances, rebates and distributor price protection programs. These estimates are based on contract terms, historical experience, inventory levels in the distributor channel and other factors. Management believes it has sufficient historical experience to allow for reasonable and reliable estimation of these reductions to revenue. However, declining market conditions could result in increased sales returns and allowances and potential distributor price protection incentives, resulting in future reductions to revenue.

Inventory Excess and Obsolescence Reserves—We maintain reserves to reduce the value of inventory based on the lower of cost or market principle, including allowances for excess and obsolete inventory. These reserves are based on management’s assumptions about and analysis of relevant factors including current levels of orders and backlog, shipment experience, forecasted demand and market conditions. We do not believe our products are subject to a significant risk of obsolescence in the short term and management believes it has the ability to adjust production levels in response to declining demand. However, if actual market conditions deteriorate from those anticipated by management, additional allowances for excess and obsolete inventory could be required.

Product Warranty Reserves—We recognize a liability for the estimated claims that may be paid under our customer warranty agreements to remedy potential deficiencies of quality or performance of our products. The product warranties extend over periods ranging from one to twenty-five years from the date of sale, depending upon the product subject to the warranty. We record a provision for estimated future warranty claims based upon the historical relationship of warranty claims to sales and specifically identified warranty issues. We base our estimates on historical experience and on assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances and revise our estimates, as appropriate, when events or changes in circumstances indicate that revisions may be necessary. Although these estimates are based on management’s knowledge of and experience with past and current events and on management’s assumptions about future events, it is reasonably possible that they may ultimately differ materially from actual results.

Income Tax Valuation Allowances—We establish an income tax valuation allowance when available evidence indicates that it is more likely than not that all or a portion of a deferred tax asset will not be realized. In assessing the need for a valuation allowance, we consider the amounts and timing of expected future deductions or carryforwards and sources of taxable income that may enable utilization. We maintain an existing valuation allowance until sufficient positive evidence exists to support its reversal. Changes in the amount or timing of expected future deductions or taxable income may have a material impact on the level of deferred tax valuation allowances. If we determine that we will not be able to realize all or part of a deferred tax asset in the future, an increase to an income tax asset valuation allowance would be charged to earnings in the period such determination was made.

Impairment Reviews—Management reviews intangible assets, investments and other long-lived assets for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying values may not be fully recoverable. Goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite lives are tested for impairment annually as of August 31 and on an interim basis when events or circumstances change. Management assesses potential impairment of the carrying values of these assets based on market prices, if available, or assumptions about and estimates of future cash flows expected from these assets. Operating performance, market conditions and other factors may adversely impact estimates of expected future cash flows. Any impairment indicated by this analysis would be measured as the amount by which the carrying value exceeds fair value, estimated by management based on market prices, if available, or forecasted cash flows,

26

---

discounted using a discount rate commensurate with the risks involved. Assumptions related to future cash flows and discount rates involve management judgment and are subject to significant uncertainty. If assumptions used in the assessment and measurement of impairment differ from management’s prior estimates and forecasts, additional impairment charges could be required.

Pension and Postretirement Benefits—Our pension and postretirement benefit costs and liabilities are developed from actuarial valuations. Critical assumptions inherent in these valuations include the discount rate, health care cost trend rate, rate of return on plan assets and mortality rates. Assumptions are subject to change each year based on changes in market conditions and in management’s assumptions about future events. Changes in these assumptions may have a material impact on future pension and postretirement benefit costs and liabilities.

COMPARISON OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2005 WITH THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004

 

Effective January 31, 2004, we acquired substantially all of the assets and assumed certain liabilities of Connectivity Solutions from Avaya and the Connectivity Solutions operating results have been included in our consolidated financial statements since the date of acquisition. Accordingly, the consolidated results for the year ended December 31, 2004 include the operating results of Connectivity Solutions for the eleven-month period from February 1, 2004 through December 31, 2004. This information should be considered when comparing the financial results of 2005 and 2004. See Note 3 in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Form 10-K.

Net sales

Below is a summary that reflects our actual net sales by segment for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004. The net sales for the year ended December 31, 2004 incorporate the Connectivity Solutions net sales for the eleven-month period from February 1, 2004 through December 31, 2004. This summary also reflects pro forma net sales for the year ended December 31, 2004, as if Connectivity Solutions had been acquired on January 1, 2004. The pro forma net sales of the Connectivity Solutions for the one-month period ended January 31, 2004 are based on the historical results of the Connectivity Solutions business as operated by Avaya during the periods presented and therefore may not be indicative of the actual results of the Connectivity Solutions business as operated by us. Actual inter-segment sales eliminations for the

27

---

eleven-month period ended December 31, 2004 and pro forma inter-segment sales eliminations for January 2004 are included below.

The table and discussion below compare net sales for the year ended December 31, 2005 to the pro forma net sales for the year ended December 31, 2004, since the actual net sales for the eleven months ended December 31, 2004 would not be comparable. However, these pro forma results may not be indicative of the actual results of the Connectivity Solutions business as operated by us.

 

Overall, consolidated net sales increased during 2005 primarily due to strong growth in domestic ICS and wireless product sales within the Carrier segment and higher prices in response to higher raw material costs and modest sales growth in the Enterprise and Broadband segments.

Enterprise Segment

The increase in net sales of Enterprise segment products was primarily driven by improved international project business and the positive impact of price increases for certain products. We announced price increases for certain Enterprise segment products during 2004 as a result of significant increases in the cost of certain raw materials and further increased prices in 2005 in response to continued raw material cost increases. In addition, the launch during 2004 of our Uniprise brand contributed to the increase in net sales. Domestic net sales volume of Enterprise segment products in 2005 were modestly lower than 2004, reflecting some limited customer acceptance of price increases. During 2004, SYSTIMAX sales volume was negatively impacted by an effort to reduce external inventory balances held by distributors to a more appropriate level.

We believe that the overall improvement in the financial condition of our customers and the continued demand for networks to support increased bandwidth has and will continue to contribute to an increase in their information technology budgets. If additional price increases in response to rising raw material costs are necessary, however, net sales could be adversely affected if customer acceptance is limited.

Broadband Segment

The increase in net sales of Broadband segment products for 2005 primarily resulted from the positive impact of price increases for certain products. Sales were also positively affected by expansion of international cable networks and the rebuilding of infrastructure damaged by the Gulf Coast hurricanes in the United States.

28

We believe that there are opportunities for continued international sales growth as a result of market deregulation and economic growth. Domestic spending by cable television system operators is largely limited to network maintenance, resulting in more limited growth opportunities. In February 2006, we announced that we had signed a definitive agreement to acquire certain of the assets supporting the trunk and distribution cable television products of Trilogy Communications, Inc. The acquisition, subject to due diligence and customary closing conditions, is expected to close during the first quarter of 2006. During the 12 months ended September 30, 2005, the product lines being acquired had revenues of less than $20 million.

Carrier Segment

The ICS product line generated the largest portion of the increase in Carrier segment net sales for 2005. ICS sales increased substantially due to sales to wireline carriers for DSL and FTTN applications in the United States. These carriers are expected to continue investing in high-speed data and video services as they compete with cable and other providers of broadband capacity. We believe that we are well positioned to benefit from this investment, though the growth may be volatile as customer spending is mainly project driven.

Sales of Cell Reach®  wireless products during 2005 nearly doubled from 2004. The improvement in general financial conditions of our customers and competition to provide increased network capacity and capabilities has led to increased spending by the major wireless carriers. In addition, we have developed relationships with certain new customers, who generally purchase larger diameter products, which have comparatively higher prices. We believe we continue to make steady progress communicating the Cell Reach value proposition to new and existing customers, both domestically and internationally. While we expect sales of wireless products to be somewhat volatile since customer spending is mainly project driven, we remain optimistic about our long-term global wireless opportunities.

Sales of ExchangeMAX products decreased in 2005 due largely to weak demand for central office telecommunications equipment. We have decided to exit the ExchangeMAX twisted pair central office cable business as we believe that the outlook for improvements in this business is poor. This business had net sales of approximately $10 million during 2005. We plan to retain the ExchangeMAX apparatus business and believe that it should achieve modest growth.

Gross profit (net sales less cost of sales)

Gross profit for 2005 increased by $89.7 million to $344.5 million and 2005 gross profit margin increased to 25.8% compared to 22.1% for 2004. These improvements reflect the impact of price increases implemented in response to increases in raw material costs, changes in the mix of products sold and cost reductions, including those resulting from the initiatives begun during the fourth quarter of 2004 at the CSMI Omaha facility.

Gross profit margin for 2004 was adversely affected by the impact of purchase accounting adjustments on the Connectivity Solutions inventory. These purchase accounting adjustments resulted from the write-up of Connectivity Solutions finished goods and work in process inventory to reflect its acquired fair value as of the acquisition date. This write-up to fair value resulted in an increase of approximately $14.6 million in cost of sales and lower margins following the Connectivity Solutions acquisition as the acquired inventory was sold.

The rising cost of raw materials, such as copper, aluminum, plastics and other polymers, and steel increased cost of sales. As a result of these higher costs, we implemented price increases for certain products during 2004 and 2005, which somewhat offset the impact of higher raw material prices on gross margin.

29

---

We expect gross profit and gross profit margin to improve in 2006, largely as a result of higher sales volume and cost savings, including those from the global manufacturing initiative begun in 2005 (see Restructuring Costs below). However, further increases in raw material costs as a result of rising commodity prices may reduce gross profit and gross profit margin if we are unable to achieve market acceptance of recently announced and future price increases.

Selling, general and administrative expense

Selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses increased by $6.6 million to $199.7 million during 2005 and decreased as a percentage of net sales to 14.9% during 2005 compared to 16.8% during 2004. The increase in SG&A is net of a $13.2 million benefit related to recovery of accounts receivable from Adelphia that had been written off in 2002. See Note 8 in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Form 10-K for additional discussion of this recovery. Excluding the impact of the Adelphia recovery, SG&A as a percentage of net sales was 15.9% for 2005. This adjusted percentage is lower than that for 2004 reflecting the impact of cost reduction initiatives and the absence of various costs incurred in 2004 associated with the acquisition of Connectivity Solutions.

Research and development

R&D expense increased by $2.0 million to $31.3 million during 2005 primarily related to developing new Enterprise segment structured cabling solutions, cost effective designs for products within each of our segments and production modifications for certain Enterprise and Broadband segment products in order to be in a position to comply with new regulations governing the use of certain hazardous substances in the manufacture of electronic equipment and components.

In-process research and development charges

We recognized a $4.0 million pretax charge in 2004 for the write-off of in-process R&D acquired in our acquisition of Connectivity Solutions. This R&D was valued as an intangible asset by independent appraisal in accordance with purchase accounting guidance. Since R&D activities are required to be expensed as incurred under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, this acquired intangible asset was written off immediately following the acquisition date.

Acquisition-related transition and startup costs

We incurred pretax charges of $8.3 million during 2004 as a result of startup, transition and other costs related to the acquisition of Connectivity Solutions. These charges primarily related to information technology, transition activities and other acquisition-related costs.

We reduced the Connectivity Solutions workforce by approximately 45 employees, or 2% of the global workforce, during the first quarter of 2004. The reductions were primarily related to our efforts to improve operational efficiency and reduce cost and primarily affected the Enterprise segment. We recorded net pretax charges of $1.3 million in acquisition-related transition and startup costs for employee termination benefits related to this workforce reduction.

Restructuring Costs

We recognized $38.6 million of pretax restructuring charges during 2005, compared to $14.2 million recognized during 2004. The 2005 charges included $34.5 million related to global manufacturing initiatives adopted by the Board of Directors in August 2005 and $4.1 million related to completing the organizational and cost reduction initiatives begun in 2004 at CSMI, the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary.

30

---

The objectives of the global manufacturing initiatives are to reduce costs by improving manufacturing efficiency and to enhance the Company’s long-term competitive position. Implementation of these initiatives includes shifting significant Enterprise and Broadband segment cable production capacity among our global facilities and the expected closing of a Broadband segment manufacturing facility in Scottsboro, Alabama in late 2006.

Charges incurred for the global manufacturing initiatives included $18.0 million for employee-related costs, $2.4 million for equipment relocation costs and $14.1 million for asset impairment charges. The employee-related costs include accruals for severance and related fringe benefits of $8.0 million and $10.0 million related to pension and other postemployment benefit curtailment and special termination benefit costs resulting from an early retirement offer made available to and accepted by certain employees. Severance and related fringe benefits are being accrued ratably over the period employees are obligated to provide services in order to receive benefits. Accordingly, additional pretax employee-related charges of $3 million to $5 million are expected to be recognized in 2006, predominantly in the first half of the year.

Equipment relocation costs relate directly to shifting manufacturing capacity among our global manufacturing facilities and include costs to uninstall, pack, ship and re-install equipment as well as the costs to prepare the receiving facility to accommodate the equipment. These costs are recognized as the expenses are incurred and additional costs of $6 million to $8 million are expected to be recognized, primarily in 2006.

Asset impairment charges relate to production equipment that has been identified as excess, pending consolidation of certain production operations in other facilities. It is anticipated that this equipment will be available for sale once the facility consolidation is complete. The equipment has been recorded at its estimated net realizable value upon sale plus an estimate of its remaining utility while in service. Additional impairment charges may be incurred upon the disposition of these assets or if additional excess equipment is identified.

Charges incurred during 2005 related to the 2004 organizational and cost reduction initiatives included $3.7 million for process improvement costs, primarily consulting and other costs associated with modifying the manufacturing operations, and $2.1 million for asset impairment charges related to equipment that was no longer in use, including $0.5 million related to classifying a distribution facility as held for sale and reducing the carrying value to its estimated fair value less costs to sell. There was a $1.8 million reversal of reserves for severance and related fringe benefits established in 2004 as a result of there being fewer reductions in personnel, due to higher than anticipated levels of business for certain products. There are no further charges anticipated as a result of the 2004 organizational and cost reduction initiatives.

As a result of restructuring actions that have been completed and those that are in process, there is expected to be significant unutilized and underutilized space in our Omaha facility. We are evaluating alternatives for disposing of this excess space. Additional charges, which are not expected to be material, may be incurred in completing this process.

Loss on early extinguishment of debt

We recognized a $5.0 million pretax loss during 2004 on the early extinguishment of our 4% convertible subordinated notes. This loss includes premiums paid and accrued to note holders of $3.1 million and the write-off of the remaining balance of related long-term financing costs of $1.9 million. See further discussion under “Liquidity and Capital Resources.”

31

---

Net interest expense

Net interest expense during 2005 was $3.3 million, compared to $7.0 million during 2004. Our weighted average effective interest rate on outstanding borrowings, including amortization of associated loan fees, was 2.74% as of December 31, 2005, compared to 2.70% as of December 31, 2004. The average interest rate on outstanding borrowing was essentially unchanged due to the reduction in the balance of our senior term note due to scheduled principal payments, offset by increases in the rate on the note due to increases in short-term interest rates. The reduction in net interest expense was primarily the result of increased interest income due to the larger invested balances in 2005 and higher short-term interest rates.

Income taxes

Our effective income tax rate was 29.7% for 2005, compared to 32.8% for 2004. Our effective tax rate reflects the benefits derived from significant operations outside the U.S., which are generally taxed at rates lower than the U.S. statutory rate of 35%. Our 2005 tax provision includes the establishment of a $2.3 million valuation allowance related to deferred tax assets arising from net operating losses from one of our foreign subsidiaries and $2.3 million related to establishing tax reserves for various prior year state income tax matters arising from tax audits, which are substantially offset by the release of $4.2 million of previously established valuation allowances related to state net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards.

OFS BrightWave, LLC

Effective April 1, 2004, Furukawa made additional equity investments in OFS BrightWave and we elected not to make further corresponding investments in OFS BrightWave. As a result, our ownership percentage was reduced from 18.4% to 9.4%.

Primarily as a result of the continuing weakness in the fiber optic cable market and Furukawa’s continuing efforts to restructure its OFS operations, we agreed with Furukawa to further amend our existing contractual arrangements in the second quarter of 2004 for the mutual benefit of both companies. On June 14, 2004, we agreed with Furukawa to change the period in which we could exercise our contractual right to sell our ownership interest in OFS BrightWave to Furukawa from 2006 to any time on or after June 14, 2004 and changed the exercise price from $173.4 million in cash to the approximately 7.7 million shares of our common stock owned by Furukawa. On June 14, 2004, we exercised our contractual right to sell our 9.4% ownership interest in OFS BrightWave to Furukawa in exchange for the approximately 7.7 million shares of our common stock owned by Furukawa, which had a fair value of $132.3 million as of the transaction date. We currently hold these shares as treasury stock.

As a result of this transaction, we no longer own any equity interest in OFS BrightWave. However, we maintained our strategic relationship with Furukawa by entering into a four-year optical fiber supply agreement with OFS Fitel, LLC (Fitel), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Furukawa, replacing the existing supply agreement with Fitel that was scheduled to expire in November 2004. Through this supply agreement, we continue to have access to a broad array of technologically advanced optical fibers. We also have a cross license arrangement with a subsidiary of Furukawa for key intellectual property.

The OFS BrightWave transaction resulted in a net pretax gain of $121.3 million ($76.4 million net of tax or $1.13 per diluted share) during 2004. This gain represents (1) the fair value of the common stock received by us in exchange for the transfer of our ownership interest in OFS BrightWave to Furukawa, plus (2) the realized gain from our cumulative equity method share of OFS BrightWave’s unrealized foreign currency translation gains previously recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss, less (3) an $11 million impairment charge related to fully impairing a $30 million note receivable from OFS BrightWave. This transaction does not affect our right to receive full payment from OFS BrightWave under the $30 million note due in November 2006, based on its original terms. We have continued to receive quarterly interest payments in accordance with the terms of the note.

32

---

Our share of the losses of OFS BrightWave for the period from January 1, 2004 through June 14, 2004 was $2.3 million, pretax. We realized a tax benefit related to our share of the losses of $0.8 million in 2004.

2006 Outlook

We are encouraged about the global outlook for our products. We believe market conditions for the Enterprise and Broadband segments should support modest revenue growth in 2006, primarily due to slight increases in global sales volume and higher sales prices. We anticipate higher sales prices for many of our products due to the ongoing increases in the cost of raw materials such as copper, aluminum and plastics. Carrier segment sales are expected to grow faster than our other segments as certain wireline and wireless operators upgrade their communications networks. We are dependent upon continued spending for maintenance of existing infrastructure and ongoing capital investment by our customers in order to achieve an increase in sales.

We expect operating income to increase during 2006, primarily due to higher sales volumes and ongoing cost reduction. Our previously announced global manufacturing initiatives should also support improved profitability in 2006, primarily in the second half of the year. However, rising raw materials costs remain a risk to operating margin.

COMPARISON OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004 WITH THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2003

 

Effective January 31, 2004, we completed the acquisition of substantially all of the assets and assumed certain liabilities of Connectivity Solutions. The Connectivity Solutions operating results have been included in our consolidated financial statements since the date of the acquisition. Accordingly, the consolidated results for the year ended December 31, 2004 include the operating results of Connectivity Solutions for the eleven-month period from February 1, 2004 through December 31, 2004. However, the consolidated results reflected above for the year ended December 31, 2003 do not include any actual or pro forma results for Connectivity Solutions. This information should be considered when comparing the financial results of 2004 and 2003. See Note 3 in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Form 10-K.

33

---

Net sales

Below is a summary that reflects our actual net sales for the year ended December 31, 2004, which includes the Connectivity Solutions net sales for the eleven-month period from February 1, 2004 through December 31, 2004. This summary also reflects pro forma net sales for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, as if Connectivity Solutions had been acquired on January 1, 2003. The pro forma net sales of Connectivity Solutions for the one-month period ended January 31, 2004 and for the year ended December 31, 2003 are based on the historical results of the Connectivity Solutions business as operated by Avaya during the periods presented and therefore may not be indicative of the actual results of Connectivity Solutions as operated by us. Actual inter-segment sales eliminations for the eleven-month period ended December 31, 2004 and pro forma inter-segment sales eliminations for the pro forma periods are included below.

 

Overall, consolidated net sales, on a pro forma basis, increased during 2004 primarily due to an increase in international sales of Broadband segment products and domestic sales of Enterprise segment products. In addition, improving business conditions and continuing benefits of deregulation in selected international markets contributed to the overall increase in net sales of our Broadband segment products. As the economic environment improved during 2004, companies increased capital spending.

Enterprise Segment

The net sales of Enterprise segment products were moderately higher during 2004 primarily due to strong domestic sales volumes driven by improved project business and the positive impact of price increases for certain products. During the first quarter of 2004, we announced two price increases for certain products on new projects, primarily due to the rising cost of copper and certain polymers. During the first half of 2004, SYSTIMAX sales volume was negatively impacted by an effort to reduce external inventory balances held by distributors to a more appropriate level. During the second half of 2004, the SYSTIMAX product line reported strong sales, which more than offset the impact of the first half weak sales growth. In addition, the launch of our Uniprise brand contributed to the increase in net sales of Enterprise segment products.

Broadband Segment

The increase in net sales of Broadband segment products for 2004 primarily resulted from strong international sales volumes and the positive impact of price increases for certain products. Despite lower sales of fiber optic cable and lower sales to our largest domestic Broadband segment customer, sales of Broadband segment products increased moderately during 2004 due to price increases, higher

34

---

international sales related in part to deregulation in selected markets and reconstruction related to certain storms that occurred in the southeastern U.S.

Carrier Segment

The increase in net sales of Carrier segment products was mainly due to a higher volume of sales, primarily in wireless and ICS products in domestic markets. The improvement in general financial conditions of our customers has led to increased spending by the major wireless carriers. In addition, we have developed relationships with certain new customers, who generally purchase larger diameter products, which have comparatively higher prices. We believe we continue to make steady progress communicating the Cell Reach value proposition to new and existing customers, both domestically and internationally. While we expect sales of wireless products to be somewhat volatile since customer spending is mainly project-driven, we remain optimistic about our long-term global wireless opportunities.

The increase in ICS net sales for 2004 was primarily due to increased sales volumes resulting from increasing service provider DSL deployments.

The improvement in wireless and ICS sales was somewhat offset by the decrease in net sales of ExchangeMAX products for 2004. This decrease was primarily related to the continued impact of competitive pricing pressure and weak demand for central office telecommunications equipment.

Gross profit (net sales less cost of sales)

Gross profit increased by $140.2 million to $254.8 million, primarily due to the acquisition of Connectivity Solutions. Gross profit margin increased to 22.1% during 2004 compared to 20.0% during 2003, primarily due to the contribution of the Connectivity Solutions SYSTIMAX products, as these products generated higher margins, on average, than our other products.

Gross profit margin for 2004 was adversely affected by the impact of purchase accounting adjustments on the Connectivity Solutions inventory. These purchase accounting adjustments resulted from the write-up of Connectivity Solutions finished goods and work in process inventory to reflect its acquired fair value as of the acquisition date. This write-up to fair value resulted in an increase of approximately $14.6 million in cost of sales and lower margins following the Connectivity Solutions acquisition as the acquired inventory was sold.

The rising cost of raw materials, such as copper, aluminum, plastics and other polymers, and steel also increased cost of sales. As a result of these higher costs, we announced price increases for certain products during 2004, which somewhat offset the impact of higher raw material prices on gross margin during 2004.

Selling, general and administrative expense

SG&A expenses increased by $107.4 million to $193.1 million during 2004, primarily due to the acquisition of Connectivity Solutions. As a percentage of sales, SG&A increased to 16.8% of net sales during 2004 compared to 14.9% of net sales during 2003. In addition to costs associated with the acquisition, the increase in SG&A as a percentage of sales was primarily driven by increases in sales and marketing expenses to bring new products to market and to market existing product groups. Additional increases in SG&A were primarily driven by higher employee compensation and benefit costs, insurance costs, professional fees related to new regulatory requirements, and travel costs.

35

Research and development

R&D expense increased by $23.1 million to $29.3 million during 2004 primarily due to the acquisition of Connectivity Solutions, which involves more extensive research and development activities than our business prior to the acquisition. At the time of the acquisition of Connectivity Solutions, we gained over 100 R&D professionals who focus on fundamental research, product development and enhancements, and manufacturing processes related to Connectivity Solutions products. During 2004, we incurred R&D costs primarily related to developing new Enterprise segment structured cabling solutions as well as cost effective designs for cables, apparatus and cabinets.

Impairment charges for fixed assets

During the fourth quarter of 2004, $6.8 million of fixed asset impairment charges were recognized as a component of the restructuring costs incurred in connection with the cost reduction initiatives at CSMI’s Omaha facility (see Restructuring Costs below).

During the second quarter of 2003, as a result of the difficult global business environment in telecommunications and an ongoing decline in demand, both domestically and internationally, and reduced export sales from our Brazilian operation, we determined that certain domestic and Brazilian manufacturing fixed assets were impaired. Accordingly, we obtained third party appraisals of the majority of these specifically-identified assets to determine their fair values and the resulting amount of impairment charges to be recognized. In total, we recognized pretax impairment charges as follows (in millions):

 

In-process research and development charges

We recognized a $4.0 million pretax charge in 2004 for the write-off of in-process R&D acquired in our acquisition of Connectivity Solutions. This R&D was valued as an intangible asset by independent appraisal in accordance with purchase accounting guidance. Since R&D activities are required to be expensed as incurred under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, this acquired intangible asset was written off immediately following the acquisition date, with subsequent adjustments and write-offs resulting from changes in the purchase price allocation.

Acquisition-related transition and startup costs

We incurred pretax charges of $8.3 million during 2004 as a result of startup, transition and other costs related to the acquisition of Connectivity Solutions. These charges primarily related to information technology, transition activities and other acquisition-related costs.

We reduced the Connectivity Solutions workforce by approximately 45 employees, or 2% of the global workforce, during the first quarter of 2004. The reductions were primarily related to our efforts to improve operational efficiency and reduce cost and primarily affected the Enterprise segment. We recorded net pretax charges of approximately $1.3 million in acquisition-related transition and startup costs for employee termination benefits related to this workforce reduction.

36

---

Restructuring Costs

We recognized a $14.2 million pretax charge for restructuring costs during the fourth quarter of 2004 related to organizational and cost reduction initiatives at CSMI’s Omaha, Nebraska facility. CSMI’s Omaha facility is utilized in the Enterprise and Carrier segments and was acquired on January 31, 2004 as part of the acquisition of the Connectivity Solutions business of Avaya.

The charge consisted of $5.8 million of employee-related costs, including severance pay and related fringe benefits and a net pension plan curtailment loss; $6.8 million of impairment charges related to manufacturing equipment that is no longer used in operations; and $1.6 million of process improvement costs related to consulting and other costs associated with modifying the manufacturing operations.

Loss on early extinguishment of debt

We recognized a $5.0 million pretax loss during 2004 on the early extinguishment of our 4% convertible subordinated notes. This loss includes premiums paid and accrued to note holders of $3.1 million and the write-off of the remaining balance of related long-term financing costs of $1.9 million. See further discussion under “Liquidity and Capital Resources.”

Net interest expense

Net interest expense during 2004 was $7.0 million, compared to $5.8 million during 2003. Our weighted average effective interest rate on outstanding borrowings, including amortization of associated loan fees, was 2.70% as of December 31, 2004, compared to 4.85% as of December 31, 2003. Although our average interest rate decreased, net interest expense increased due to higher average outstanding balances of long-term debt, incurred primarily for the acquisition of Connectivity Solutions. The decrease in the effective interest rate was primarily due to the refinancing in March and April 2004 of our then existing $172.5 million aggregate principal amount of 4% convertible subordinated notes with the issuance of $250 million aggregate principal amount of 1% convertible senior subordinated debentures.

Income taxes

Our effective income tax rate was 32.8% for 2004, compared to 37.0% for 2003. Our effective tax rate reflects the benefits derived from significant operations outside the U.S., which are generally taxed at rates lower than the U.S. statutory rate of 35%. In conjunction with our Connectivity Solutions acquisition, we significantly increased the number of international locations in which we conduct business.

OFS BrightWave, LLC

Effective April 1, 2004, Furukawa made additional equity investments in OFS BrightWave and we elected not to make further corresponding investments in OFS BrightWave. As a result, our ownership percentage was reduced from 18.4% to 9.4%.

Primarily as a result of the continuing weakness in the fiber optic cable market and Furukawa’s continuing efforts to restructure its OFS operations, we agreed with Furukawa to further amend our existing contractual arrangements in the second quarter of 2004 for the mutual benefit of both companies. On June 14, 2004, we agreed with Furukawa to change the period in which we could exercise our contractual right to sell our ownership interest in OFS BrightWave to Furukawa from 2006 to any time on or after June 14, 2004 and changed the exercise price from $173.4 million in cash to the approximately 7.7 million shares of our common stock owned by Furukawa. On June 14, 2004, we exercised our contractual right to sell our 9.4% ownership interest in OFS BrightWave to Furukawa in exchange for the approximately 7.7 million shares of our common stock owned by Furukawa, which had a fair value of $132.3 million as of the transaction date. We currently hold these shares as treasury stock.

37

---

As a result of this transaction, we no longer own any equity interest in OFS BrightWave. However, we maintained our strategic relationship with Furukawa by entering into a four-year optical fiber supply agreement with OFS Fitel, LLC (Fitel), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Furukawa, replacing the existing supply agreement with Fitel that was scheduled to expire in November 2004. Through this supply agreement, we continue to have access to a broad array of technologically advanced optical fibers. We also have a cross license arrangement with a subsidiary of Furukawa for key intellectual property.

The OFS BrightWave transaction resulted in a net pretax gain of $121.3 million ($76.4 million net of tax or $1.13 per diluted share) during 2004. This gain represents (1) the fair value of the common stock received by us in exchange for the transfer of our ownership interest in OFS BrightWave to Furukawa, plus (2) the realized gain from our cumulative equity method share of OFS BrightWave’s unrealized foreign currency translation gains previously recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss, less (3) an $11 million impairment charge related to fully impairing a $30 million note receivable from OFS BrightWave. This transaction does not affect our right to receive full payment from OFS BrightWave under the $30 million note due in November 2006, based on its original terms.

Our share of the losses of OFS BrightWave for the period from January 1, 2004 through June 14, 2004 was $2.3 million, pretax, compared to $98.2 million during 2003. The 2003 results reflected the impact of impairment charges for certain fixed assets and intangible assets, restructuring and employee separation costs. We realized a tax benefit related to our share of the losses of $0.8 million in 2004 and $36.3 million in 2003.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Cash Flow Overview

Our principal sources of liquidity, both on a short-term and long-term basis, are cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments, cash flows provided by operations and availability under credit facilities. Reduced sales and profitability could reduce cash provided by operations and limit availability under credit facilities. In addition, increases in working capital, excluding cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments, related to increasing sales could reduce our operating cash flows in the short term until cash collections of accounts receivable catch up to the higher level of billings.

 

The increase in cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments as of December 31, 2005 was primarily the result of cash flow from operations. The increase also reflects proceeds from the exercise of stock options, offset by capital expenditures and scheduled principal repayments on our long-term debt.

The reduction in cash flow from operations and the increase in working capital were primarily driven by an increase in accounts receivable attributable to a change in credit terms, implemented in January 2005 for certain customers to reduce the prompt payment discount and higher inventory balances resulting from higher sales volumes and increased raw materials costs.

38

---

Our long-term debt as a percent of book capital structure decreased during 2005 primarily due to the increase in book capital from net earnings and issuance of common stock as a result of stock option exercises and the decrease in long-term debt of $13 million as a result of scheduled principal repayments.

Operating Activities

Net cash provided by operating activities decreased year over year primarily due to the increase in accounts receivable resulting from the change in credit terms as well as higher inventory levels resulting from higher sales volumes and increased raw material costs. In addition, we also paid $22.1 million in income taxes in 2005, compared to $11.7 million in 2004. We expect to generate net cash from operations during 2006 primarily due to improved margins from sales of certain product groups and the impact of our cost reduction efforts.

Investing Activities

Our investment in property, plant and equipment was higher during 2005 primarily due to capital spending related to cost reduction efforts and additional production capability in Asia, including completing the construction of a manufacturing facility in Suzhou, China and beginning an expansion of that facility. We expect total capital expenditures to remain at a level below consolidated depreciation and amortization expense for the next several years.

Financing Activities

On January 31, 2004, in connection with our acquisition of Connectivity Solutions, we replaced our then existing $100 million secured credit facility with a new $185 million senior secured credit facility. This new senior secured credit facility is comprised of a $75 million term loan and a $110 million revolving credit facility and is secured by substantially all of our assets, is guaranteed by all of our material domestic subsidiaries and contains certain financial and restrictive covenants. The balance outstanding under the term loan facility as of December 31, 2005 was $36.5 million and is required to be repaid by us in consecutive quarterly installments of $3.25 million with a final payment of all outstanding principal and interest on December 31, 2008. We had availability under the new revolving credit facility of $76 million and had no outstanding borrowings under this facility as of December 31, 2005. Our ability to borrow under this revolving credit facility depends on the amount of our borrowing base, which is determined as specified percentages of our eligible receivables and inventory, reduced for certain reserves and the total amount of letters of credit issued under the credit facility. We believe we were in compliance with all of our covenants under this senior secured credit facility as of December 31, 2005. See Note 10 in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Form 10-K for additional discussion of the terms of this senior secured credit facility.

In March 2004, we issued $250 million aggregate principal amount of 1% convertible senior subordinated debentures due March 15, 2024. The proceeds from these debentures were used primarily to extinguish our outstanding 4% convertible subordinated notes due December 15, 2006, to repay $25 million of borrowings under our revolving credit facility, and for general corporate purposes. We repurchased or redeemed all of our 4% convertible subordinated notes during March and April 2004. The repurchase and redemption of these notes resulted in a $5.0 million pretax loss on the early extinguishment of debt. See Note 10 in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Form 10-K for additional discussion of the terms of these debentures.

Future Cash Needs

We expect that our primary future cash needs will be to fund working capital, capital expenditures, debt service and employee benefit obligations. We expect to make up to $15 million in voluntary

39

---

contributions to our defined benefit pension plans during 2006 and that these noncurrent employee benefit liabilities will be funded with cash flows from future operations. In February 2006, we announced that we had signed a definitive agreement with Trilogy Communications, Inc. (Trilogy) to acquire certain assets supporting Trilogy’s MC2® 75-ohm trunk and distribution cable television products business and certain other assets. This transaction, which is subject to due diligence and customary closing conditions, is expected to close during the first quarter of 2006 and we expect to fund the purchase price of approximately $14 million, subject to certain inventory adjustments, from existing balances of cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments.

We believe that our existing cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments and cash flows from operations, combined with availability under our senior secured revolving credit facility, will be sufficient to meet our presently anticipated future cash needs. We may, from time to time, borrow under our revolving credit facility or issue securities, if market conditions are favorable, to meet our future cash needs or to reduce our borrowing costs.

CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS

The following table summarizes our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2005 (in millions):

(a)           Refer to Note 10 to the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Form 10-K for information regarding the terms of our long-term debt agreements.

(b)          Interest on variable rate debt is estimated based upon rates in effect as of December 31, 2005.

(c)           Purchase obligations include minimum amounts owed under take-or-pay or requirements contracts. Amounts covered by open purchase orders are excluded as there is no contractual obligation until goods or services are received.

(d)          Amounts reflect expected payments under the postretirement benefit plans (see Note 12 in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Form 10-K). As there is no contractual obligation to make pension contributions, no amounts have been reflected above.

(e)           Estimated payments are based on exchange rates in effect as of December 31, 2005.

EFFECTS OF INFLATION AND CHANGING PRICES

We continually attempt to minimize any effect of inflation on earnings by controlling our operating costs and selling prices. The principal raw materials purchased by us (fabricated aluminum, plastics and other polymers, bimetals, copper and optical fiber) are subject to changes in market price as they are influenced by commodity markets. Prices for copper, fluoropolymers and certain other polymers derived from oil and natural gas have increased substantially over the last two years. As a result, we have significantly increased our prices for certain products and may have to increase prices again in the future.

40

---

To the extent that we are unable to pass on cost increases to customers without a significant decrease in sales, these cost increases could have a material impact on the results of our operations.

OTHER

We are either a plaintiff or a defendant in pending legal matters in the normal course of business; however, we believe none of these legal matters will have a materially adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations upon final disposition. In addition, we are subject to various federal, state, local and foreign environmental laws and regulations governing the use, discharge, disposal and remediation of hazardous materials. Compliance with current laws and regulations has not had, and is not expected to have, a materially adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

NEWLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

In November 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 151, “Inventory Costs, an amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4.” This Statement is the result of efforts to converge U.S. accounting standards for inventories with International Accounting Standards. SFAS No. 151 requires that items such as idle facility expense, excessive spoilage and rehandling costs be recognized as expenses in the current period. It also requires that allocation of fixed production overheads to the costs of conversion be based on normal capacity of the production facilities. SFAS No. 151 will be effective for the Company in 2006. Application of SFAS No. 151 is not expected to have a material impact on our results of operations or financial position.

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment,” which establishes standards related to the accounting for transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity instruments for goods or services. This revised standard also addresses transactions in which an entity incurs liabilities in exchange for goods or services that are based on the fair value of the entity’s equity instruments or that may be settled by the issuance of these equity instruments. SFAS No. 123(R) focuses primarily on accounting for transactions in which an entity obtains employee services in share-based payment transactions. This standard requires a public entity to measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value of the award and recognize the cost over the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award. The Company has elected the modified prospective method of transition to SFAS No. 123(R), which will be effective in 2006. As part of this transition, the Company will recognize compensation expense related to future stock option and other share-based compensation grants immediately for grantees who are retirement-eligible rather than continue the current practice employed in the statement of operations and in the pro forma footnote disclosure that recognizes expense ratably over the vesting period regardless of the retirement eligibility of grantees. The Company believes that this statement will have a material impact on its Consolidated Statement of Operations. The pro forma effects on net income (loss) and net income (loss) per share related to the application of this standard, had we applied fair value recognition provisions for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, are reported in Note 2 of the Notes in the Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Form 10-K.

41