This excerpt taken from the CCRT 10-K filed Mar 8, 2005.
We Operate in a Heavily Regulated Industry
Changes in bankruptcy, privacy or other consumer protection laws, or to the prevailing interpretation thereof, may expose us to litigation, adversely affect our ability to collect credit card account balances in connection with our traditional credit card business, Jefferson Capital charged off receivables operations and micro-lending activities, or otherwise adversely affect our operations. Similarly, regulatory changes could adversely affect our ability to market credit cards and other products and services to our customers. The accounting rules that govern our business are exceedingly complex, difficult to apply and in a state of flux. As a result, how we value our credit card receivables and otherwise account for our business (including whether we consolidate our securitizations) is subject to change depending upon the interpretation of, and changes in, those rules. Some of these issues are discussed more fully below.
Consumer protection laws may make collection of account balances more difficult or may expose us to the risk of litigation. Our operations and the operations of CB&T and the other issuing banks through which we originate credit card portfolios and other consumer receivables are regulated by federal, state and local government authorities and are subject to various laws, rules and regulations, as well as judicial and administrative decisions imposing requirements and restrictions on our business. Due to the consumer-oriented nature of the credit industry, there is a risk that we or other industry participants may be named as defendants in litigation involving alleged violations of federal and state laws and regulations, including consumer protection laws. Any failure to comply with legal requirements by us or any other issuer of credit products, including CB&T, or by us or our agents, as the servicer of our accounts, could significantly impair our ability to collect the full amount of the account balances. Further, any failure to comply with the legal requirements could expose us or the other issuing banks, including CB&T, to the risk of litigation under state and federal consumer protection statutes, rules and regulations. There is always a risk that new legislation or regulations, or a change in the interpretation of existing legislation or regulations, could place additional requirements and restrictions on our business. This risk is amplified since our target market consists almost entirely of sub-prime borrowers, and lawmakers and regulators recently have shown an interest in increasing the regulation of this segment in order to protect the customers of and investors in sub-prime lenders. The institution of any litigation of this nature or any judgment against us or any other industry participant in any litigation of this nature could adversely affect our business and financial condition in a variety of ways. For more information regarding consumer and debtor protection laws applicable to CB&T and us, please see "Item 1. BusinessConsumer and Debtor Protection Laws and Regulations" herein.
Changes to consumer protection laws or changes in their interpretation may impede collection efforts or otherwise adversely impact our business practices. Federal and state consumer protection laws regulate the creation and enforcement of consumer loans, including credit card accounts and receivables. As an originator and servicer of sub-prime receivables, we typically charge higher interest rates and fees than lenders serving consumers with higher credit scores. As a result, sub-prime lenders are commonly the target of legislation (and revised legislative interpretations) intended to prohibit or curtail these and other industry-standard practices. Among others, changes in the consumer protection laws could result in the following:
Accordingly, our business is always subject to changes in the regulatory environment. Changes or additions to the consumer protection laws and related regulations, or to the prevailing interpretations thereof, could invalidate or call into question a number of our existing products, services and business practices, including our origination, charged off receivable collection and micro-lending activities. Any material regulatory developments could adversely impact our results from operations.
Changes in law may increase our credit losses and administrative expenses, restrict the amount of interest and other charges imposed on the credit card accounts or limit our ability to make changes to existing accounts. Numerous legislative and regulatory proposals are advanced each year, which, if adopted, could harm our profitability or limit the manner in which we conduct our activities. Changes in federal and state bankruptcy and debtor relief laws may increase our credit losses and administrative expenses. More restrictive laws, rules and regulations may be adopted in the future which could make compliance more difficult or expensive, further restrict the amount of interest and other charges we can impose on the credit products we originate or market, target sub-prime lenders, limit our ability to make changes to the terms of existing accounts or otherwise significantly harm our business.
The Retail Micro-Lending and Servicing segment of our business operates in an increasingly hostile regulatory environment. Most states have specific laws regulating micro-lending activities and practices (micro-lending is sometimes referred to as "payday" lending). However, during the last few years, legislation has been adopted in some states that prohibits or severely restricts micro-lending cash advance services. For example, in May 2004, a new law became effective in Georgia that effectively prohibits certain micro-lending practices in the state. In 2004, bills to restrict or prohibit micro-lender cash advances also have been introduced in state legislatures including Arizona, Illinois, Iowa, Louisiana, Missouri, New Hampshire, Virginia, West Virginia and Wisconsin. In addition, Mississippi and Arizona have sunset provisions in their laws permitting micro-lending that require renewal of the laws by the state legislatures at periodic intervals. Although states provide the primary regulatory framework under which we conduct our micro-lending services, certain federal laws also impact our business. On March 1, 2005 the FDIC issued guidance limiting the frequency of borrower usage of micro-loans offered by FDIC supervised institutions and the period a customer may have micro-loans outstanding from any lender to three months during the previous twelve-month period. It is unclear how this guidance will impact the business. Future laws or regulations (at the state, federal or local level) prohibiting micro-lending services or making them unprofitable could be passed at any time or existing micro-lending laws could expire or be amended, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Additionally, state attorneys general, banking regulators, and others have begun to scrutinize the micro-lending industry and may take actions that could require us to cease or suspend operations in their respective states. For example, a group of plaintiffs has brought a series of putative class action lawsuits in North Carolina claiming, among other things, that the micro-lender cash advance activities of the defendants violate numerous North Carolina consumer protection laws. The lawsuits seek various remedies including treble damages. One of these lawsuits is pending against CompuCredit and five of its subsidiaries. (See "Legal Proceedings" for additional information regarding that lawsuit.) If these cases are determined adversely to the defendants, there could be significant losses, including the inability to continue as micro-lenders in North Carolina, the inability to collect loans outstanding in North Carolina, and the payment by the lenders of monetary damages.
Negative publicity may impair acceptance of our products. Critics of sub-prime credit card issuers and micro-lenders have in the past focused on marketing practices that they claim encourage consumers to borrow more money than they should, as well as on pricing practices that they claim are either confusing or result in prices that are too high. Consumer groups and media reports frequently characterize sub-prime lenders as predatory or abusive toward consumers. If these negative characterizations become widely accepted by consumers, demand for our products and services could be adversely impacted. Increased criticism of the industry or criticism of us in the future could hurt customer acceptance of our products or lead to changes in the law or regulatory environment, either of which would significantly harm our business.
Internet security breaches could damage our reputation and business. Internet security breaches could damage our reputation and business. As part of our growth strategy, we may expand our origination of credit card accounts over the internet. The secure transmission of confidential information over the internet is essential to maintaining consumer confidence in our products and services offered online. Advances in computer capabilities, new discoveries or other developments could result in a compromise or breach of the technology used by us to protect customer application and transaction data transmitted over the internet. Security breaches could damage our reputation and expose us to a risk of loss or litigation. Moreover, consumers generally are concerned with security and privacy on the internet, and any publicized security problems could inhibit the growth of the internet as a means of conducting commercial transactions. Our ability to solicit new account holders over the internet would be severely impeded if consumers become unwilling to transmit confidential information online.