The Hindu Business Line  Mar 18  Comment 
The Competition Commission has given its nod to the acquisition of Raj Petro Specialities by Germany-based chemical distribution company Brenntag AG. According to a notice submitted with C
The Economic Times  Mar 15  Comment 
It was alleged that HMSI had perpetuated tie-in arrangements, imposed resale price maintenance and maintained a discount control mechanism through the standard form of dealership agreement.
The Economic Times  Mar 10  Comment 
"The whole process will take about six to nine months to start operating,"
The Economic Times  Mar 9  Comment 
"@CCI_India approves acquisition of RCOM's towers, optic fiber cable, right to use spectrum and media convergence nodes by RJIO," the anti-trust regulator tweeted.
The Economic Times  Mar 8  Comment 
Senior Advocate J F Pochkhanawalla who appeared for the Council said the order shows that the CCI is pro-active and that people cannot get away by flouting the competition norms.
The Economic Times  Mar 8  Comment 
It was alleged that JSW Cement had abused its dominant market position by denying the complainant supply of cement in breach of the dealership agreement entered between the two.
The Economic Times  Mar 8  Comment 
Lenders went with Dalmia-led consortium's bid as it fulfilled all conditions including an approval from the CCI for the acquisition of Binani Cement.
The Times of India  Mar 7  Comment 
The Competition Commission of India (CCI) has collectively imposed a fine of about Rs 55 crore on three airline — Jet Airways, IndiGo and SpiceJet — for allegedly taking concerted action in fixing and revising fuel surcharge (FSC) — a...
The Economic Times  Mar 7  Comment 
A fine of Rs 39.81 crore has been imposed on Jet Airways while the penalties on InterGlobe Aviation and SpiceJet are Rs 9.45 crore and Rs 5.10 crore, respectively


Crown Castle International (NYSE: CCI) is the largest cell phone tower company in the U.S. It leases antenna space on its over 24,000 towers to wireless service providers, including Verizon Communications (VZ), Sprint Nextel (S), T-Mobile, Alltel, and AT&T (T).[1] In light of its 2006 merger with Global Signal, the company is has slightly more towers than its top competitor, American Tower (AMT).

Cell phone towers (often called cell sites since there are both tower and rooftop sites) derive revenue from multiple tenants who use the infrastructure simultaneously. Because of the regulatory difficulty of building new towers (at least domestically), growth is largely driven by adding tenants to existing towers. This gives the tower companies significant barriers to entry and strong cash flow from incremental business at each tower.

Crown Castle depends on the success of the wireless communications business. The U.S. industry has seen steep growth over the past few years driven by greater market saturation and higher levels of cell phones per user and per household. As the company's US wireless market matures with a penetration near 75%, domestic growth may slow down, and become increasingly dependent on selling more cell phones per capita and additional services (which take extra bandwidth on towers). The company has announced interests in entering cell phone markets in emerging economies, particularly India, which is one of the fastest growing and largest in the world.

Company Overview

Crown Castle International leases and maintains wireless infrastructure and over 24,000 towers, which are mostly in the United States and, to a lesser degree, Australia.[1] The company leases antenna space to wireless service providers, including Verizon Communications (VZ), Sprint Nextel (S), T-Mobile, Alltel, and AT&T (T). The company also derives a limited amount of revenue from servicing antennae and other infrastructure projects for customers that build their own infrastructure, though it has de-emphasized such business in recent years.

Business Financials

In 2009, CCI earned a total of $1.7 billion in total revenues. This was a significant increasefrom its 2008 total revenues of $1.5 billion in 2008. However, despite the increase in total revenues, CCI's net income situation deteriorated. Between 2008 and 2009, CCI's net loss increased from a net loss of $49 million in 2009 to a net loss of $114 million in 2009.

Merger with Global Signal, Inc.

The company acquired in early 2007 what was previously the third largest tower operating, Global Signals. The purchase makes the combined company the largest tower company by tower base and anticipated market share. Global Signal's tower base is, on average, less mature than CCI's at 1.8 vs. CCI's 2.5 tenants per tower. If the company can successfully raise this number, CCI stands to enjoy a greater number of more efficient cash-generating towers.

Trends and Drivers

The US cell phone market

Since 2004, cell phone usage in the United States--the company's most important market--has increased 38%. Increased cell phone usage means greater antenna and infrastructure utilization for the company, which in turn drives revenue. Given the attractive per tower economics of new business (most new business flows directly to the bottom line), the company has enjoyed growth and improved margins. The United States still lags other developed countries' cell phone saturation, leaving room for growth, but as the market continues to mature quickly, the company must seek other avenues of growth. However, market saturation may prove to help CCI, as once saturation point hits, any additional revenue per tower goes directly to its bottom line.

International growth

The company can seek growth opportunities in the Australian market, though the Australian market is nearly saturated at over 80% penetration. The company may also pursue opportunities in other markets in which it has little or no footprint, perhaps including India, the most rapidly growing cell phone market in developing countries in which competitor American Tower (AMT) is highly interested.

Consolidation and Infrastructure Sharing of Wireless Carriers

In recent years, companies such as Cingular and AT&T (T) and Sprint and Nextel have merged, evidence of increased consolidation among wireless carriers. This consolidation, as well as arrangements to share networks, has led to increased customer bargaining power and lower demand for total antenna usage. This is largely due to the fact that the companies' existing networks and their new, combined networks overlap or are being rationalized as expansion plans converge.[2] The continued elimination of these duplications will lower revenue per tower, hurting margins and cash flow generation.

Concentration of Wireless Customers

Around 68.3% of the company's business comes from just 5 customers, including Sprint Nextel (S) (14.8%), Cingular (23.5%), Verizon Communications (VZ) (20.3%) and T-Mobile (8.6%). Because the company generally signs long-term, 5-10 year lease contracts with these companies, any unwillingness or inability to pay future obligations or any serious disputes with one of these companies can have a materially adverse affect on the business.

Threat of Substitution

Disruptive technologies such as VoIP may in the long-run alter how voice and mobile phone services and subscriptions are delivered. These new technologies may avoid the use of towers or other heavy infrastructure, and substitution toward them can take business away from wireless carriers and, ultimately, the company. While currently VoIP is largely replacing land-lines (since it requires internet access and most people use it via a computer), the pace of change in the industry makes it difficult to determine the demand for mobile tower infrastructure in the long-run.

Government Regulation

Heavy FCC & Federal Aviation Administration regulation governs the construction and maintenance of existing towers. Each proposed new tower must be approved subject to height and weight requirements, location, environmental impact, and various other factors. Furthermore, each existing tower is inspected and expected to meet stringent standards and maintenance requirements, which may necessitate capital expenditures and fees related to upkeep and compliance. While no laws to date limit the construction of new towers, it has become increasingly hard to build new towers, so each of the major three tower companies enjoy regulatory barriers to entry and scale that cannot easily be duplicated by new entrants.

Competition and Market Share

After recent consolidation in the industry, domestic competition between wireless infrastructure rental companies has become relatively consolidated among three major players: American Tower (AMT), SBA Communications (SBAC) and Crown Castle. American Tower is the largest by revenue and market share, but following Crown Castle's 2006 merger with Global Signal, Inc., the company is neck-and-neck in terms of number of towers. Below is a comparison of relevant operating metrics.

Company Tower Rev. 2008 ($M)[3] # of Towers Revenue per Tower US Market Share (by rental revenue)[4]
Crown Castle International (CCI)[5] $697 12,912 $53,958 29%
Global Signal, Inc. (merged with CCI in early 2007) N/A 10,749 N/A 18%
American Tower (AMT) $1,249 22,000 $58,818 42%
SBA Communications (SBAC) $351 5,551 $46,118 11%

All of these companies, however, also compete against wireless carriers who choose to maintain their own networks and build their own infrastructure, though these companies, of course, do not draw revenue from their towers. The leased tower segment comprises around 55,000 of the total 200,000 towers across the country.[6]


  1. 1.0 1.1 CCI 10-K 2009 Item 1 Pg. 1
  2. AMT 2006 Annual Report, "Risk Factors," pg 12-13
  3. Figures compiled from company annual reports
  4. Estimates from American Tower Website, www.americantower.com
  5. Figures exclude effect of merger with Global Signal, Inc.
  6. Estimates compiled from company annual report figures
Wikinvest © 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012. Use of this site is subject to express Terms of Service, Privacy Policy, and Disclaimer. By continuing past this page, you agree to abide by these terms. Any information provided by Wikinvest, including but not limited to company data, competitors, business analysis, market share, sales revenues and other operating metrics, earnings call analysis, conference call transcripts, industry information, or price targets should not be construed as research, trading tips or recommendations, or investment advice and is provided with no warrants as to its accuracy. Stock market data, including US and International equity symbols, stock quotes, share prices, earnings ratios, and other fundamental data is provided by data partners. Stock market quotes delayed at least 15 minutes for NASDAQ, 20 mins for NYSE and AMEX. Market data by Xignite. See data providers for more details. Company names, products, services and branding cited herein may be trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners. The use of trademarks or service marks of another is not a representation that the other is affiliated with, sponsors, is sponsored by, endorses, or is endorsed by Wikinvest.
Powered by MediaWiki