|
|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| |||||||||
This excerpt taken from the DKS DEF 14A filed Apr 20, 2009. Benchmarking
Executive Compensation
The current economic downturn has and will continue to have a
major impact on executive compensation. In the face of increased
financial and operational challenges, the Company remains
committed to a performance pay approach in determining executive
officer pay. During this period of economic volatility, the
challenge is to balance realistic performance expectations while
at the same time preserving the incentive to focus on our core
philosophy of relentless improvement in everything we
do. In addition, it is now more critical than ever to
ensure that we attract and retain the most capable and competent
leaders for our Company. To achieve the appropriate balance with
respect to these varying elements, the Compensation Committee
considers the pay mix between base and variable compensation in
setting executive officer pay to align with stockholder
interests and to be flexible enough to react to changing
economic conditions.
The Hay Group, a nationally known consulting company with a
strong emphasis in the retail sector, was originally engaged by
the Companys management in the fall of 2007 to conduct a
comprehensive market analysis for use in evaluating and
establishing executive compensation. In 2008 management engaged
the Hay Group to assist in developing a comprehensive review of
our executive officer total direct compensation. This data was
utilized by our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer to assist
him in developing recommendations to the Compensation Committee
regarding executive officer compensation. Each direct pay
component utilized by the Company was analyzed using the Hay
Group 2008 Retail Industry Total Remuneration Report (referred
to in this proxy statement as the Hay Retail
Survey), which includes 97 companies and provides
data by job title (controlling for differences in responsibility
and revenue). The Hay Group provides no other services to the
Company and the Compensation Committee believes the work
performed by The Hay Group for management does not in any way
impact the independence of the Compensation Committee members.
In addition, at the request of the Compensation Committee,
management in 2008 utilized the Hay Group to conduct a review of
the direct compensation components for our named executive
officers against a benchmark retail group, which we refer to as
the Peer Analysis. The Peer Analysis focused on base
pay, annual bonus and stock-based compensation. The Compensation
Committee approved the establishment of an Executive
Compensation Retail Peer Group using the following general
criteria for purposes of conducting the Peer Analysis:
The decision to include companies with up to double annual
revenues of the Company aligns with the aspirational nature of
our growth strategy, thereby reflecting the appropriate
recruitment universe from which we desire to attract executive
officer talent to support that strategy. Additionally, the
broader criteria ensures a sufficient number of companies are
included in our peer group to provide meaningful benchmarks.
Since the current economic conditions have affected most, if not
all, of these companies in a similar manner, the Compensation
Table of Contents
Committee believes the peer group continues to represent a
proper benchmark for our executive officer compensation.
This peer group will be reviewed periodically by the
Compensation Committee and may change from time to time based on
each retailers continued relevance to the Companys
current or future business model, as well as the competitive
environment for executive talent. At its December 2008 meeting,
the Compensation Committee reviewed the peer group against
updated financial and operational metrics and determined that no
revisions were required at that time. The peer group is
comprised of the following companies:
This excerpt taken from the DKS DEF 14A filed May 7, 2008. Benchmarking
Executive Compensation
The Hay Group, a nationally known consulting company with a
strong emphasis in the retail sector, was engaged by the
Companys management in the fall of 2007 to conduct a
comprehensive market analysis for use in evaluating and
establishing executive compensation. Each direct pay component
utilized by the Company was analyzed against the Hay Group 2007
Retail Industry Total Remuneration Report (referred to in this
proxy statement as the Hay Retail Survey), which
includes 100 companies and provides data by job title
(controlling for differences in responsibility and revenue).
In addition, at the request of the Compensation Committee,
management in 2007 conducted a review of the direct compensation
components for our named executive officers against a benchmark
retail group, which we refer to as the Peer
Analysis. The Peer Analysis focused on base pay, annual
bonus and stock-based compensation.
The Compensation Committee approved the establishment of an
Executive Compensation Retail Peer Group using the
following general criteria for purposes of conducting the Peer
Analysis:
In addition to the above criteria, the Peer Analysis considered
the Companys financial and operational performance against
that of the peer group, in areas such as Total Shareholder
Return, Sales and Net Income Growth, Return on Invested Capital
and Return on Equity. This peer group will be reviewed
periodically by the Compensation Committee and may change from
time to time based on each retailers continued relevance
to the
Table of Contents
Companys current or future business model, as well as the
competitive environment for executive talent. The peer group is
currently comprised of the following companies:
| EXCERPTS ON THIS PAGE:
RELATED TOPICS for DKS: |
| |||||||