|
|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| |||||||||
This excerpt taken from the DKS DEF 14A filed Apr 24, 2006. Stock Options.
During fiscal 2005, the Compensation Committee operated under
guidelines for stock option grants, which are generally
applicable to all eligible employees. Under these guidelines,
stock option grants are generally made on an annual basis in
amounts that take into account such factors as market data on
total compensation packages, the value of stock option grants at
targeted external companies, total stockholder return, share
usage and stockholder dilution. In appropriate cases, however,
special grants may be authorized outside of the annual-grant
framework.
Generally, all decisions to grant stock options are in the sole discretion of the Compensation Committee and, except for grants to the Chief Executive Officer, based upon recommendation from the Chief Executive Officer. Historically most options have vested over a minimum of four (4) years. Virtually all options are granted with exercise prices equal to the market value of the Companys common stock.
Mr. Stack, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, is eligible to participate in the same executive compensation program available to other Company executives and his total annual compensation, including compensation derived from the annual bonus program, was set by the Compensation Committee based on the same factors as other executives, namely, the continued increase in the Companys earnings and the Companys comparative performance versus other companies in the sporting goods retail category. Payments earned by Mr. Stack are included in the Summary Compensation Table. Mr. Stack as a greater than 5% stockholder is ineligible to participate in the Companys employee stock purchase plan.
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code generally disallows a tax deduction to public corporations for compensation over $1,000,000 paid for any fiscal year to the corporations chief executive officer and four (4) other most highly compensated executive officers as of the end of any fiscal year. However, the statute exempts qualifying performance-based compensation from the deduction limit if certain requirements are met. The Committee believes that it is generally in the Companys best interest to attempt to structure performance-based compensation, including stock option grants and annual bonuses, to executive officers who may be subject to Section 162(m) in a manner that satisfies the statutes requirements. However, the Committee also recognizes the need to retain flexibility to make compensation decisions that may not meet Section 162(m) standards when necessary to enable the Company to meet its overall objectives, even if the Company may not deduct all of the compensation. Accordingly, the Compensation Committee expressly reserves the authority to approve non-deductible compensation in appropriate circumstances. Further, because of ambiguities and uncertainties as to the application and interpretation of Section 162(m) and the regulations issued thereunder, no assurance can be given, notwithstanding the Companys efforts, that compensation intended by the Company to satisfy the requirements for deductibility under Section 162(m) does in fact do so.
16
Table of Contents
This excerpt taken from the DKS DEF 14A filed Apr 25, 2005. Stock Options.
During fiscal 2004, the Compensation Committee operated under
guidelines for stock option grants, which are generally
applicable to all eligible employees. Under these guidelines,
stock option grants are generally made on an annual basis in
amounts that take into account such factors as market data on
total compensation packages, the value of stock option grants at
targeted external companies, total stockholder return, share
usage and stockholder dilution. In appropriate cases, however,
special grants may be authorized outside of the annual-grant
framework.
Generally, all decisions to grant stock options are in the sole discretion of the Compensation Committee and, except for grants to the Chief Executive Officer, based upon recommendation from the Chief Executive Officer. Historically most options have vested over a minimum four (4) years. Virtually all options are granted with exercise prices equal to the market value of the Companys common stock. 15
Table of Contents
Mr. Stack, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, is eligible to participate in the same executive compensation program available to other Company executives and his total annual compensation, including compensation derived from the annual bonus program, was set by the Compensation Committee based on the same factors as other executives, namely, the continued increase in the Companys earnings and the Companys comparative performance versus other companies in the sporting goods retail category. Payments earned by Mr. Stack are included in the Summary Compensation Table. Mr. Stack as a greater than 5% stockholder is ineligible to participate in the Companys employee stock purchase plan.
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code generally disallows a tax deduction to public corporations for compensation over $1,000,000 paid for any fiscal year to the corporations chief executive officer and four (4) other most highly compensated executive officers as of the end of any fiscal year. However, the statute exempts qualifying performance-based compensation from the deduction limit if certain requirements are met. The Committee believes that it is generally in the Companys best interest to attempt to structure performance-based compensation, including stock option grants and annual bonuses, to executive officers who may be subject to Section 162(m) in a manner that satisfies the statutes requirements. However, the Committee also recognizes the need to retain flexibility to make compensation decisions that may not meet Section 162(m) standards when necessary to enable the Company to meet its overall objectives, even if the Company may not deduct all of the compensation. Accordingly, the Compensation Committee expressly reserves the authority to approve non-deductible compensation in appropriate circumstances. Further, because of ambiguities and uncertainties as to the application and interpretation of Section 162(m) and the regulations issued thereunder, no assurance can be given, notwithstanding the Companys efforts, that compensation intended by the Company to satisfy the requirements for deductibility under Section 162(m) does in fact do so.
| EXCERPTS ON THIS PAGE:
RELATED TOPICS for DKS: |
| |||||||