EBAY » Topics » About Skype

This excerpt taken from the EBAY 8-K filed Nov 6, 2009.

About Skype

Skype is software that enables the world’s conversations. Millions of individuals and businesses use Skype to make free video and voice calls, send instant messages and share files with other Skype users. Every day, people everywhere also use Skype to make low-cost calls to landlines and mobiles.

This excerpt taken from the EBAY 8-K filed Sep 1, 2009.

About Skype

Skype is software that enables the world’s conversations. Millions of individuals and businesses use Skype to make free video and voice calls, send instant messages and share files with other Skype users. Every day, people everywhere also use Skype to make low-cost calls to landlines and mobiles.

This excerpt taken from the EBAY 10-Q filed Apr 28, 2009.

Skype

The market for Skype’s products is also intensely competitive and characterized by rapid technological change. We expect Skype’s various communications competitors, including, for example, the providers of online communications products and telecommunications operators, to continue to improve the performance of their current products and introduce new products, software, services and technologies. Many telecommunications firms offer “bundled” services, where a group of services that may include cable or satellite television, internet services (e.g., cable modem or DSL), and telecommunications are offered for a single monthly price. If Skype’s competitors successfully introduce new products, offer “bundled” services or enhance their existing products, this could reduce the market for Skype’s products, increase price competition, or make Skype’s products obsolete, which could lower Skype’s adoption rates, decrease its ability to attract new users or cause its current users to migrate to a competing company.

Additionally, several of Skype’s current and potential competitors have longer operating histories, are substantially larger, and have greater financial, marketing, technical, and other resources. Some also have greater name recognition and a larger installed base of customers than Skype has.

These excerpts taken from the EBAY 10-K filed Feb 20, 2009.
Skype
 
The market for Skype’s products is also intensely competitive and characterized by rapid technological change. We expect Skype’s various communications competitors, including, for example, the providers of online communications products and telecommunications operators, to continue to improve the performance of their current products and introduce new products, software, services and technologies. Many telecommunications firms offer “bundled” services, where a group of services that may include cable or satellite television, internet services (e.g., cable modem or DSL), and telecommunications are offered for a single monthly price. If Skype’s competitors successfully introduce new products, offer “bundled” services or enhance their existing products, this could reduce the market for Skype’s products, increase price competition, or make Skype’s products obsolete, which could lower Skype’s adoption rates, decrease its ability to attract new users or cause its current users to migrate to a competing company.
 
Additionally, several of Skype’s current and potential competitors have longer operating histories, are substantially larger, and have greater financial, marketing, technical, and other resources. Some also have greater name recognition and a larger installed base of customers than Skype has.
 
Skype


 



The market for Skype’s products is also intensely
competitive and characterized by rapid technological change. We
expect Skype’s various communications competitors,
including, for example, the providers of online communications
products and telecommunications operators, to continue to
improve the performance of their current products and introduce
new products, software, services and technologies. Many
telecommunications firms offer “bundled” services,
where a group of services that may include cable or satellite
television, internet services (e.g., cable modem or DSL), and
telecommunications are offered for a single monthly price. If
Skype’s competitors successfully introduce new products,
offer “bundled” services or enhance their existing
products, this could reduce the market for Skype’s
products, increase price competition, or make Skype’s
products obsolete, which could lower Skype’s adoption
rates, decrease its ability to attract new users or cause its
current users to migrate to a competing company.


 



Additionally, several of Skype’s current and potential
competitors have longer operating histories, are substantially
larger, and have greater financial, marketing, technical, and
other resources. Some also have greater name recognition and a
larger installed base of customers than Skype has.


 




This excerpt taken from the EBAY 10-Q filed Oct 23, 2008.
Skype
 
The market for Skype’s products is also intensely competitive and characterized by rapid technological change. We expect Skype’s various communications competitors, including, for example, the providers of online communications products and telecommunications operators, to continue to improve the performance of their current products and introduce new products, software, services and technologies. If Skype’s competitors successfully introduce new products or enhance their existing products, this could reduce the market for Skype’s products, increase price competition, or make Skype’s products obsolete, which could lower Skype’s adoption rates, decrease its ability to attract new users or cause its current users to migrate to a competing company.
 
Additionally, several of Skype’s current and potential competitors have longer operating histories, are substantially larger, and have greater financial, marketing, technical, and other resources. Some also have greater name recognition and a larger installed base of customers than Skype has.


59


Table of Contents

This excerpt taken from the EBAY 10-Q filed Jul 24, 2008.
Skype
 
The market for Skype’s products is also intensely competitive and characterized by rapid technological change. We expect Skype’s various communications competitors, including, for example, the providers of online communications products and telecommunications operators, to continue to improve the performance of their current products and introduce new products, software, services and technologies. If Skype’s competitors successfully introduce new products or enhance their existing products, this could reduce the market for Skype’s products, increase price competition, or make Skype’s products obsolete, which could lower Skype’s adoption rates, decrease its ability to attract new users or cause its current users to migrate to a competing company.
 
Additionally, many of Skype’s current and potential competitors have longer operating histories, are substantially larger, and have greater financial, marketing, technical, and other resources. Some also have greater name recognition and a larger installed base of customers than Skype has.
 
This excerpt taken from the EBAY 10-Q filed Apr 24, 2008.
Skype
 
The market for Skype’s products is also emerging, intensely competitive and characterized by rapid technological change. We expect Skype’s various communications competitors, including telecommunications carriers and the providers of online communications products, to continue to improve the performance of their current products and introduce new products, software, services and technologies. If Skype’s competitors successfully introduce new products or enhance their existing products, this could reduce the market for Skype’s products, increase price competition, or make Skype’s products obsolete, which could lower Skype’s adoption rates, decrease its ability to attract new users or cause its current users to migrate to a competing company.
 
Additionally, many of Skype’s current and potential competitors have longer operating histories, are substantially larger, and have greater financial, marketing, technical, and other resources. Some also have greater name recognition and a larger installed base of customers than Skype has.


54


Table of Contents

This excerpt taken from the EBAY 10-Q filed Apr 24, 2008.
Skype
 
The market for Skype’s products is also emerging, intensely competitive and characterized by rapid technological change. We expect Skype’s various communications competitors, including telecommunications carriers and the providers of online communications products, to continue to improve the performance of their current products and introduce new products, software, services and technologies. If Skype’s competitors successfully introduce new products or enhance their existing products, this could reduce the market for Skype’s products, increase price competition, or make Skype’s products obsolete, which could lower Skype’s adoption rates, decrease its ability to attract new users or cause its current users to migrate to a competing company.
 
Additionally, many of Skype’s current and potential competitors have longer operating histories, are substantially larger, and have greater financial, marketing, technical, and other resources. Some also have greater name recognition and a larger installed base of customers than Skype has.


54


Table of Contents

These excerpts taken from the EBAY 10-K filed Feb 29, 2008.
Skype
 
The market for Skype’s products is also emerging, intensely competitive, and characterized by rapid technological change. Many traditional telecommunications carriers, Internet companies, and cable providers


36


Table of Contents

offer, or have indicated that they plan to offer, VoIP products or services that compete with the software Skype provides. Microsoft recently announced the expansion of its Office communications suite to include VoIP. We expect competitors to continue to improve the performance of their current products and introduce new products, software, services, and technologies. If Skype’s competitors successfully introduce new products or enhance their existing products, this could reduce the market for Skype’s products, increase price competition, or make Skype’s products obsolete, which could lower Skype’s adoption rates, decrease its ability to attract new users or cause its current users to migrate to a competing company. In addition, some of Skype’s competitors, such as telecommunications carriers and cable television providers, are bundling services and products that Skype does not offer. These include various forms of wireless communications, voice and data services, Internet access, and cable television. This form of bundling may put Skype at a competitive disadvantage if these providers can combine a variety of service offerings at a single attractive price. Furthermore, competitors may choose to make their services interoperable with one another, rather than proprietary, which could increase the attractiveness of their services relative to Skype and decrease the value of Skype’s network of users.
 
Many of Skype’s current and potential competitors have longer operating histories, are substantially larger, and have greater financial, marketing, technical, and other resources. Some also have greater name recognition and a larger installed base of customers than Skype has. As a result of their greater resources, many current and potential competitors may be able to lower their prices substantially, thereby eroding some or all of Skype’s cost advantage.
 
Skype


 



The market for Skype’s products is also emerging, intensely
competitive, and characterized by rapid technological change.
Many traditional telecommunications carriers, Internet
companies, and cable providers





36





Table of Contents






offer, or have indicated that they plan to offer, VoIP products
or services that compete with the software Skype provides.
Microsoft recently announced the expansion of its Office
communications suite to include VoIP. We expect competitors to
continue to improve the performance of their current products
and introduce new products, software, services, and
technologies. If Skype’s competitors successfully introduce
new products or enhance their existing products, this could
reduce the market for Skype’s products, increase price
competition, or make Skype’s products obsolete, which could
lower Skype’s adoption rates, decrease its ability to
attract new users or cause its current users to migrate to a
competing company. In addition, some of Skype’s
competitors, such as telecommunications carriers and cable
television providers, are bundling services and products that
Skype does not offer. These include various forms of wireless
communications, voice and data services, Internet access, and
cable television. This form of bundling may put Skype at a
competitive disadvantage if these providers can combine a
variety of service offerings at a single attractive price.
Furthermore, competitors may choose to make their services
interoperable with one another, rather than proprietary, which
could increase the attractiveness of their services relative to
Skype and decrease the value of Skype’s network of users.


 



Many of Skype’s current and potential competitors have
longer operating histories, are substantially larger, and have
greater financial, marketing, technical, and other resources.
Some also have greater name recognition and a larger installed
base of customers than Skype has. As a result of their greater
resources, many current and potential competitors may be able to
lower their prices substantially, thereby eroding some or all of
Skype’s cost advantage.


 




This excerpt taken from the EBAY 10-Q filed Oct 29, 2007.
Skype
 
The market for Skype’s products is also emerging, intensely competitive, and characterized by rapid technological change. Many traditional telecommunications carriers, Internet companies, and cable providers


60


Table of Contents

offer, or have indicated that they plan to offer, VoIP products or services that compete with the software Skype provides. Microsoft recently announced the expansion of its Office communications suite to include VoIP. We expect competitors to continue to improve the performance of their current products and introduce new products, software, services, and technologies. If Skype’s competitors successfully introduce new products or enhance their existing products, this could reduce the market for Skype’s products, increase price competition, or make Skype’s products obsolete, which could lower Skype’s adoption rates, decrease its ability to attract new users or cause its current users to migrate to a competing company. In addition, some of Skype’s competitors, such as telecommunications carriers and cable television providers, are bundling services and products that Skype does not offer. These include various forms of wireless communications, voice and data services, Internet access, and cable television. This form of bundling may put Skype at a competitive disadvantage if these providers can combine a variety of service offerings at a single attractive price. Furthermore, competitors may choose to make their services interoperable with one another, rather than proprietary, which could increase the attractiveness of their services relative to Skype and decrease the value of Skype’s network of users.
 
Many of Skype’s current and potential competitors have longer operating histories, are substantially larger, and have greater financial, marketing, technical, and other resources. Some also have greater name recognition and a larger installed base of customers than Skype has. As a result of their greater resources, many current and potential competitors may be able to lower their prices substantially, thereby eroding some or all of Skype’s cost advantage.
 
This excerpt taken from the EBAY 10-Q filed Jul 27, 2007.
Skype
 
The market for Skype’s products is also emerging, intensely competitive, and characterized by rapid technological change. Many traditional telecommunications carriers and cable providers offer, or have indicated that they plan to offer, VoIP products or services that compete with the software Skype provides. In addition, many established Internet companies, including AOL, Google, Microsoft, and Yahoo, as well as newer companies, offer, or have indicated that they plan to offer in the near future, products that are similar to Skype’s. We expect competitors to continue to improve the performance of their current products and introduce new products, software, services, and technologies. If Skype’s competitors successfully introduce new products or enhance their existing products, this could reduce the market for Skype’s products, increase price competition, or make Skype’s products obsolete, which could lower Skype’s adoption rates, decrease its ability to attract new users or cause its current users to migrate to a competing company. In addition, some of Skype’s competitors, such as telecommunications carriers and cable television providers, are bundling services and products that Skype does not offer. These include various forms of wireless communications, voice and data services, Internet access, and cable television. This form of bundling may put Skype at a competitive disadvantage if these providers can combine a variety of service offerings at a single attractive price. Furthermore, competitors may choose to make their services interoperable with one another, rather than proprietary, which could increase the attractiveness of their services relative to Skype and decrease the value of Skype’s network of users.
 
Many of Skype’s current and potential competitors have longer operating histories, are substantially larger, and have greater financial, marketing, technical, and other resources. Some also have greater name recognition and a larger installed base of customers than Skype has. As a result of their greater resources, many current and potential competitors may be able to lower their prices substantially, thereby eroding some or all of Skype’s cost advantage.
 
This excerpt taken from the EBAY 10-Q filed Apr 25, 2007.
Skype
 
The market for Skype’s products is also emerging, intensely competitive, and characterized by rapid technological change. Many traditional telecommunications carriers and cable providers offer, or have indicated that they plan to offer, VoIP products or services that compete with the software Skype provides. In addition, many established Internet companies, including AOL, Google, Microsoft, and Yahoo, as well as newer companies, offer, or have indicated that they plan to offer in the near future, products that are similar to Skype’s. We expect competitors to continue to improve the performance of their current products and introduce new products, software, services, and technologies. If Skype’s competitors successfully introduce new products or enhance their existing products, this could reduce the market for Skype’s products, increase price competition, or make Skype’s products


53


Table of Contents

obsolete, which could lower Skype’s adoption rates, decrease its ability to attract new users or cause its current users to migrate to a competing company. In addition, some of Skype’s competitors, such as telecommunications carriers and cable television providers, may be able to bundle services and products that Skype does not offer. These could include various forms of wireless communications, voice and data services, Internet access, and cable television. This form of bundling would put Skype at a competitive disadvantage if these providers can combine a variety of service offerings at a single attractive price. Furthermore, competitors may choose to make their services interoperable with one another, rather than proprietary, which could increase the attractiveness of their services relative to Skype and decrease the value of Skype’s network of users.
 
Many of Skype’s current and potential competitors have longer operating histories, are substantially larger, and have greater financial, marketing, technical, and other resources. Some also have greater name recognition and a larger installed base of customers than Skype has. As a result of their greater resources, many current and potential competitors may be able to lower their prices substantially, thereby eroding some or all of Skype’s cost advantage.
 
This excerpt taken from the EBAY 10-K filed Feb 28, 2007.
Skype
 
On October 14, 2005, we acquired all of the outstanding securities of Skype Technologies S.A. (“Skype”), for a total initial consideration of approximately $2.6 billion, plus potential performance-based payments of up to approximately $1.3 billion (based on the Euro-dollar exchange rate at the time of the acquisition). In addition, we agreed to assume Skype’s stock options outstanding as of the closing date and convert them into options to acquire approximately 1.9 million shares of our common stock. The initial consideration of approximately $2.6 billion was comprised of approximately $1.3 billion in cash and 32.8 million shares of our common stock. For accounting purposes, the stock portion of the initial consideration was valued at approximately $1.3 billion based on the average closing price of our common stock surrounding the acquisition announcement date of September 12, 2005.


85


Table of Contents

 
eBay Inc.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

The shares of our common stock issued in connection with the acquisition are subject to certain contractual restrictions on resale. Additionally, the assumed options have been valued at $64.6 million and were included as part of the purchase price. We accounted for the acquisition as a non-taxable purchase transaction, and accordingly, the purchase price was allocated to the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their respective fair values at the acquisition date.
 
In addition to the initial consideration, the maximum amount potentially payable under the performance-based earn-out is approximately €1.1 billion, or approximately $1.5 billion (based on a U.S. dollar to Euro exchange rate of $1.32), and would be payable in cash or common stock, at our discretion. The earn-out payments are contingent upon Skype achieving certain net revenue, gross profit margin-based and active user targets. Base earn-out payments of up to an aggregate of approximately €877 million, or approximately $1.2 billion (based on a U.S. dollar to Euro exchange rate of $1.32), weighted equally among the three targets, would be payable if the targets are achieved over any four-quarter period commencing on January 1, 2006 through June 30, 2009. Additional bonus earn-out payments of up to an aggregate of approximately €292 million, or approximately $386 million (based on a U.S. dollar to Euro exchange rate of $1.32), weighted equally among the three targets, would be payable if Skype exceeds the targets during calendar year 2008. Any contingent earn-out payments made would be accounted for as additional purchase price and would increase goodwill. As of December 31, 2006, the targets had not been met and accordingly, no payments had been made.
 
The intrinsic value of Skype’s unvested common stock options assumed in the acquisition totaled approximately $55.2 million and was recorded, prior to the adoption of FAS 123(R), as unearned stock-based compensation. The unearned stock-based compensation relating to the unvested options will be amortized on an accelerated basis over the remaining vesting period of approximately three years, consistent with the graded vesting approach under FASB Interpretation No. 28.
 
The estimated useful economic lives of the identifiable intangible assets acquired in the Skype acquisition are five years for registered user technology and trade names, two years for existing technology, and one year for network access agreements.
 
Supplemental information on an unaudited pro forma basis, as if the Skype acquisition were completed at the beginning of the years 2004 and 2005, is as follows (in thousands, except per share amounts):
 
                 
    December 31,  
    2004     2005  
    (Unaudited)  
 
Net revenues
  $ 3,277,534     $ 4,594,954  
                 
Net income
  $ 684,905     $ 944,057  
                 
Diluted income per share
  $ 0.49     $ 0.66  
                 
 
The unaudited pro forma supplemental information is based on estimates and assumptions, which eBay believes are reasonable. The average foreign exchange rates during years 2004 and 2005 were used in preparing the supplemental information. The unaudited pro forma supplemental information prepared by management is not necessarily indicative of the results of income in future periods or the results that actually would have been realized had eBay and Skype been a combined company during the specified periods.
 
This excerpt taken from the EBAY 10-Q filed Jul 28, 2006.
Skype
 
The market for Skype’s products is also emerging, intensely competitive, and characterized by rapid technological change. Many traditional telecommunications carriers and cable providers offer, or have indicated that they plan to offer, VoIP products or services that compete with the software Skype provides. In addition, many Internet companies, including AOL, Google, Microsoft, and Yahoo! offer, or have indicated that they plan to offer in the near future, products that are similar to Skype’s. We expect competitors to continue to improve the performance of their current products and introduce new products, software, services, and technologies. If Skype’s competitors successfully introduce new products or enhance their existing products, this could reduce the market for Skype’s products, increase price competition, or make Skype’s products obsolete. For example, Skype’s competitors may integrate more traditional methods of online communication that do not involve VoIP technology, such as instant messaging, with content and functionality that Skype does not have, or that is superior to Skype’s, which


61


Table of Contents

could lower Skype’s adoption rates, decrease its ability to attract new users or cause its current users to migrate to a competing company. In addition, some of Skype’s competitors, such as telecommunications carriers and cable television providers, may be able to bundle services and products that Skype does not offer. These could include various forms of wireless communications, voice and data services, Internet access, and cable television. This form of bundling would put Skype at a competitive disadvantage if these providers can combine a variety of service offerings at a single attractive price. Furthermore, competitors may choose to make their services interoperable with one another, rather than proprietary, which could increase the attractiveness of their services relative to Skype and decrease the value of Skype’s network of users.
 
Many of Skype’s current and potential competitors have longer operating histories, are substantially larger, and have greater financial, marketing, technical, and other resources. Some also have greater name recognition and a larger installed base of customers than Skype has. As a result of their greater resources, many current and potential competitors may be able to lower their prices substantially, thereby eroding some or all of Skype’s cost advantage.
 

"About Skype" elsewhere:

Nokia (NOK)
Wikinvest © 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012. Use of this site is subject to express Terms of Service, Privacy Policy, and Disclaimer. By continuing past this page, you agree to abide by these terms. Any information provided by Wikinvest, including but not limited to company data, competitors, business analysis, market share, sales revenues and other operating metrics, earnings call analysis, conference call transcripts, industry information, or price targets should not be construed as research, trading tips or recommendations, or investment advice and is provided with no warrants as to its accuracy. Stock market data, including US and International equity symbols, stock quotes, share prices, earnings ratios, and other fundamental data is provided by data partners. Stock market quotes delayed at least 15 minutes for NASDAQ, 20 mins for NYSE and AMEX. Market data by Xignite. See data providers for more details. Company names, products, services and branding cited herein may be trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners. The use of trademarks or service marks of another is not a representation that the other is affiliated with, sponsors, is sponsored by, endorses, or is endorsed by Wikinvest.
Powered by MediaWiki