|
|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
This excerpt taken from the EGBN DEF 14A filed Apr 6, 2009. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
The Bank has had, and expects to have in the future, banking transactions in the ordinary course of business with some of its and the Companys directors, officers, and employees and their associates. In the past, all of such transactions have been on the same terms, including interest rates, maturities and collateral requirements as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with non-affiliated persons and did not involve more than the normal risk of collectability or present other unfavorable features. Loans to insiders require approval by the Board of Directors, with any interested director not participating. The Company also applies the same standards to any other transaction with an insider. Additionally, loans and other related party transactions involving Company directors must be reviewed and approved by the Audit Committee.
The maximum aggregate amount of loans (including lines of credit) to officers, directors and affiliates of the Company and Bank during the year ended December 31, 2008 amounted to $24.6 million, representing approximately 17.3% of the Companys total shareholders equity at December 31, 2008. In the opinion of the Board of Directors, the terms of these loans are no less favorable to the Bank than terms of the loans from the Bank to unaffiliated parties. On December 31, 2008, $242.6 million of loans were outstanding to individuals who, during 2008, were officers, directors or affiliates of the Company and Bank. At the time each loan was made, management believed that the loan involved no more than the normal risk of collectability and did not present other unfavorable features. None of such loans were classified as Substandard, Doubtful or Loss.
The Bank leases certain office space, at a current monthly rental of $46,716, excluding certain pass through expenses, from two limited liability companies in which a trust for the benefit of Mr. Pauls children has an 85% interest in the first company and a 51% interest in the second company.
Mr. Rogers is a partner in the law firm Shulman, Rogers, Gandal, Pordy & Ecker, P.A. which has provided, and continues to provide, legal services to the Company and its subsidiaries. During 2008 and 2007, the Company and its subsidiaries paid aggregate fees of approximately $428,215 and $21,372 to that firm.
The Bank has obtained certain deposits through title company clients in which Mr. Soto, a director of the Bank has a direct interest, and for which a broker fee of 0.50% of average deposits is paid to him monthly in arrears. During 2008 and 2007, approximately $110 thousand and $28 thousand in broker fees was paid under this arrangement.
Mr. Goodman is President of The Goodman, Gable, Gould Company, a public insurance adjusting firm, which represents the Bank, on a contingent fee basis, in connection with insurance claims in respect of a charged off loan. No amounts were paid to that firm during 2008 or 2007.
Ryan Riel, the adult son of Ms. Riel, is employed by the Bank as a loan officer. During 2008 and 2007, Mr. Riels compensation was $125,000 and $120,000, respectively, plus incentive bonus payments and awards of stock options. Mr. Riels compensation is determined on the same basis as all other comparable employees, and is determined by the Bank Compensation Committee, without any participation or input by Ms. Riel.
29
These excerpts taken from the EGBN 10-K filed Jul 23, 2008. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
The Bank has had, and expects to have in the future, banking transactions in the ordinary course of business with some of its and the Companys directors, officers, and employees and their associates. In the past, all of such transactions have been on the same terms, including interest rates, maturities and collateral requirements as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with non-affiliated persons and did not involve more than the normal risk of collectability or present other unfavorable features. Loans to insiders require approval by the Board of Directors, with any interested director not participating. The Company also applies the same standards to any other transaction with an insider. Additionally, loans and other related party transactions involving Company directors must be reviewed and approved by the Audit Committee.
16
The maximum aggregate amount of loans (including lines of credit) to officers, directors and affiliates of the Company and Bank during the year ended December 31, 2007 amounted to $18.2 million, representing approximately 22.4% of the Companys total shareholders equity at December 31, 2007. In the opinion of the Board of Directors, the terms of these loans are no less favorable to the Bank than terms of the loans from the Bank to unaffiliated parties. On December 31, 2007, $18.2 million of loans were outstanding to individuals who, during 2007, were officers, directors or affiliates of the Company and Bank. At the time each loan was made, management believed that the loan involved no more than the normal risk of collectability and did not present other unfavorable features. None of such loans were classified as Substandard, Doubtful or Loss.
The Bank leases certain office space, at a current monthly rental of $41,936, excluding certain pass through expenses, from two limited liability companies in which a trust for the benefit of Mr. Pauls children has an 85% interest in the first company and a 51% interest in the second company.
Mr. Rogers is a partner in the law firm Shulman, Rogers, Gandal, Pordy & Ecker, P.A. which has provided, and continues to provide, legal services to the Company and its subsidiaries. During 2007, the Company and its subsidiaries paid aggregate fees of approximately $21,372 to that firm.
The Bank has obtained certain deposits through title company clients in which Mr. Soto, a director of the Bank has a direct interest, and for which a broker fee of .50% of average deposits is paid to him monthly in arrears. During 2007, approximately $28 thousand in broker fees was paid.
Mr. Goodman is President of The Goodman, Gable, Gould Company, a public insurance adjusting firm, which represents the Bank, on a contingent fee basis, in connection with insurance claims in respect of a charged off loan. No amounts were paid to that firm during 2007.
Ryan Riel, the adult son of Ms. Riel, is employed by the Bank as a loan officer. During 2007, Mr. Riels compensation was $120,000 plus incentive bonus payments and awards of stock options. Mr. Riels compensation is determined on the same basis as all other comparable employees, and is determined by the Bank Compensation Committee, without any participation or input by Ms. Riel.
Certain Relationships and Related
The Bank has had, and expects to have in the future, banking
16
The maximum aggregate amount of loans (including lines of credit) to
The Bank leases certain office space, at a current monthly rental of
Mr. Rogers
The Bank has obtained certain deposits through title company clients in
Mr. Goodman is President of The Goodman, Gable, Gould Company, a
Ryan Riel, the adult son of Ms. Riel, is employed by the Bank as a
This excerpt taken from the EGBN DEF 14A filed Mar 31, 2008. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
The Bank has had, and expects to have in the future, banking transactions in the ordinary course of business with some of its and the Companys directors, officers, and employees and their associates. In the past, all of such transactions have been on the same terms, including interest rates, maturities and collateral requirements as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with non-affiliated persons and did not involve more than the normal risk of collectability or present other unfavorable features. Loans to insiders require approval by the Board of Directors, with any interested director not participating. The Company also applies the same standards to any other transaction with an insider. Additionally, loans and other related party transactions involving Company directors must be reviewed and approved by the Audit Committee.
The maximum aggregate amount of loans (including lines of credit) to officers, directors and affiliates of the Company and Bank during the year ended December 31, 2007 amounted to $18.2 million, representing approximately 22.4% of the Companys total shareholders equity at December 31, 2007. In the opinion of the Board of Directors, the terms of these loans are no less favorable to the Bank than terms of the loans from the Bank to unaffiliated parties. On December 31, 2007, $18.2 million of loans were outstanding to individuals who, during 2007, were officers, directors or affiliates of the Company and Bank. At the time each loan was made, management believed that the loan involved no more than the normal risk of collectability and did not present other unfavorable features. None of such loans were classified as Substandard, Doubtful or Loss.
The Bank leases certain office space, at a current monthly rental of $41,936, excluding certain pass through expenses, from two limited liability companies in which a trust for the benefit of Mr. Pauls children has an 85% interest in the first company and a 51% interest in the second company.
Mr. Rogers is a partner in the law firm Shulman, Rogers, Gandal, Pordy & Ecker, P.A. which has provided, and continues to provide, legal services to the Company and its subsidiaries. During 2007, the Company and its subsidiaries paid aggregate fees of approximately $21,372 to that firm.
24
The Bank has obtained certain deposits through title company clients in which Mr. Soto, a director of the Bank has a direct interest, and for which a broker fee of .50% of average deposits is paid to him monthly in arrears. During 2007, approximately $28 thousand in broker fees was paid.
Mr. Goodman is President of The Goodman, Gable, Gould Company, a public insurance adjusting firm, which represents the Bank, on a contingent fee basis, in connection with insurance claims in respect of a charged off loan. No amounts were paid to that firm during 2007.
Ryan Riel, the adult son of Ms. Riel, is employed by the Bank as a loan officer. During 2007, Mr. Riels compensation was $120,000 plus incentive bonus payments and awards of stock options. Mr. Riels compensation is determined on the same basis as all other comparable employees, and is determined by the Bank Compensation Committee, without any participation or input by Ms. Riel.
This excerpt taken from the EGBN DEF 14A filed Mar 30, 2007. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions The Bank has had, and expects to have in the future, banking transactions in the ordinary course of business with some of its and the Companys directors, officers, and employees and their associates. In the past, all of such transactions have been on the same terms, including interest rates, maturities and collateral requirements as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with non-affiliated persons and did not involve more than the normal risk of collectibility or present other unfavorable features. Loans to insiders require approval by the Board of Directors, with any interested director not participating. The Company also applies the same standards to any other transaction with an insider. Additionally, loans and other related party transactions involving Company directors must be reviewed and approved by the Audit Committee. The maximum aggregate amount of loans (including lines of credit) to officers, directors and affiliates of the Company and Bank during the year ended December 31, 2006 amounted to $20.4 million, representing approximately 28% of the Companys total shareholders equity at December 31, 2006. In the opinion of the Board of Directors, the terms of these loans are no less favorable to the Bank than terms of the loans from the Bank to unaffiliated parties. On December 31, 2006, $12.9 million of loans were outstanding to individuals who, during 2006, were officers, directors or affiliates of the Company and Bank. At the time each loan was made, management believed that the loan involved no more than the normal risk of collectibility and did not present other unfavorable features. None of such loans were classified as Substandard, Doubtful or Loss. The Bank leases certain office space, at a current monthly rental of $23,609, excluding certain pass through expenses, from two limited liability companies in which a trust for the benefit of Mr. Pauls children has an 85% interest in the first company and a 51% interest in the second company. Mr. Rogers is a partner in the law firm Shulman, Rogers, Gandal, Pordy & Ecker, P.A. which has provided, and continues to provide, legal services to the Company and its subsidiaries. During 2006, the Company and its subsidiaries paid aggregate fees of approximately $27,000 to that firm. Mr. Goodman is President of The Goodman, Gable, Gould Company, a public insurance adjusting firm, which represents the Bank, on a contingent fee basis, in connection with insurance claims in respect of a charged off loan. No amounts were paid to that firm in 2006. During 2005, the Company sold interests in a limited liability company and certain related beneficial interests in real property owned by that company, which the Company acquired in lieu of foreclosure upon nonperforming loans to a third party borrower, in the amount of approximately $3.0 million, and related deeds of trust and other collateral, to a limited liability company of which Mr. Paul is the managing member, and in which a trust for the benefit of Mr. Pauls children, Mr. Alperstein, Mr. Murphy, seven members of the Board of Directors of the Bank (and one member of the Board of Directors of the Bank who has since left the Board) have controlling financial interests. The price paid by the acquiring limited liability company was equal to the outstanding balance of the loans plus accrued but unpaid interest and fees to which the Company was entitled under the terms of the loan, and other amounts advanced by the Company, and equaled or exceeded the appraised value of the property, deeds of trust and other collateral. The Company suffered no loss in respect of the transaction or loans, and believes that the terms of the sale to the limited liability company were as favorable to the Company as those which could have been obtained from third parties, and was equal to or exceeded the market value of the property sold. Neither the Company nor the Bank financed the purchase of the property by the limited liability company, or the investment by any person in the limited liability company. | EXCERPTS ON THIS PAGE:
|
| |||||||