|
|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) |
| Revision as of 12:14, September 22, 2009 (edit) Bpan - Sr. Director (Talk | contribs) (→Corporate Overview) ← Previous diff |
Revision as of 12:15, September 22, 2009 (edit) (undo) Bpan - Sr. Director (Talk | contribs) (→Corporate Overview) Next diff → |
||
| Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
| * '''Humulin (5.3% of 2008 sales)''' is another insulin analog used for managing [[diabetes]]. | * '''Humulin (5.3% of 2008 sales)''' is another insulin analog used for managing [[diabetes]]. | ||
| - | Lilly's animal health division operates independently of its main pharmaceutical business and had sales of $1.09 billion in 2007.<ref name=LLY21/> [[stock:Eli Lilly and Company (LLY)/Trends and Forces|(Read More about Eli Lilly's key trends and forces...)]] | + | Lilly's animal health division operates independently of its main pharmaceutical business and had sales of $1.09 billion in 2007.<ref name=LLY21/> <!--[[stock:Eli Lilly and Company (LLY)/Trends and Forces|(Read More about Eli Lilly's key trends and forces...)]] |
| + | |||
| - | <!-- | ||
| <big><center>[[stock:Eli Lilly and Company (LLY)|Introduction and Overview]] | [[stock:Eli Lilly and Company (LLY)/Trends and Forces|Trends and Forces]] | [[stock:Eli Lilly and Company (LLY)/Competition|Competition]]</center></big> | <big><center>[[stock:Eli Lilly and Company (LLY)|Introduction and Overview]] | [[stock:Eli Lilly and Company (LLY)/Trends and Forces|Trends and Forces]] | [[stock:Eli Lilly and Company (LLY)/Competition|Competition]]</center></big> | ||
Eli Lilly and Company (NYSE: LLY) is the seventh largest pharmaceutical company with total sales of $20 billion, of which more than a quarter came from Zyprexa, a schizophrenia and bipolar disorder drug (see Antipsychotic Drug Market).[1][2] Although the patent for Zyprexa will expire in 2011, Eli Lilly has one of the youngest product portfolios in the industry -- the company has $6.64 dollars coming from new products (those launched within the last five years) for every dollar lost from patent-expiring ones, compared to an industry average of only 77 cents.[3]
Lilly's most promising pipeline products are Effient (prasugrel), a blood-thinner, and Byetta LAR, a long-acting-release version of the diabetes drug Byetta. Compared to Sanofi-Aventis and Bristol-Myers Squibb's Plavix, Effient is more effective at reducing heart attacks but also increases the risk of major bleeding, but for a net benefit.[4] Effient is under priority review by the FDA.[4] Byetta's biggest advantage over competitors is that it is just as effective but causes weight loss instead of gain, and there are indications that the long-acting version may be even more effective.[5]
2008 sales grew by 9.4 percent to $20.4 billion, and was mainly driven by a 28% growth in the depression and pain-management drug Cymbalta and 18% growth in Humalog.[2]
Contents |
Eli Lilly's top eight products have each generated net sales of more than $1 billion for 2008.[2]
Lilly's animal health division operates independently of its main pharmaceutical business and had sales of $1.09 billion in 2007.[2]
2008 growth of 9% to $20.3 billion was mainly driven by increases of 28% in Cymbalta sales and 18% in Humalog sales. Overall, 5% of the sales increase was due to increased volume, 3% due to favorable foreign exchange rates, and 2% due to price hikes. The company's net earnings was ($2.1 billion), largely due to the $4.7 billion acquisition of ImClone. [2][15]
Q2 2009 earnings for Eli Lilly beat the consensus for the second straight quarter. Sales grew 3% to $5.29B from $5.15B and net income grew 21% to $1.16B from $959M the year before. The company cited better margins due to a stronger dollar as partially responsible, and major drugs Cymbalta and Alimta also had particularly strong sales on the quarter. [16]
For more detailed information on the FDA approval process, see also Clinical trials.
Lilly's two most promising drugs in development are Effient, a blood thinner that will compete with Bristol-Myers/Sanofi's Plavix, and Byetta LAR, a long-acting-release version of its existing diabetes drug Byetta.
Developing a new drug is a time-consuming and costly endeavor. Hundreds of thousands of candidate compounds must be screened to identify a handful of potential drugs, and even fewer of these candidate drugs are found to be effective at treating a disease. The drug must then pass strict safety standards in several series of clinical trials. The entire process of developing a new drug and bringing it to the market takes up to 10 to 15 years and on average costs $800 million.[19]
Eli Lilly has one of the youngest product portfolios in the industry -- the company has $6.64 dollars coming from new products (those launched within the last five years) for every dollar lost from patent-expiring ones, compared to an industry average of only 77 cents.[3]
When a drug loses patent protection, generic brands of the drug can be made, breaking the monopoly that the brand-name drug originally possessed. Sales of the iconic antidepressant Prozac fell from peak sales of $2.8 billion in 2001 to a negligible amount (out of the company's annual reports) after its patent expired in 2001.[20] The patent for Zyprexa, Lilly's best-selling drug, expires in 2011.[9]
Eli Lilly, like all major pharmaceutical companies, constantly faces the threat of generic copies of its drug portfolio. When patents expire, generic copies can reduce the price of a drug to a mere fraction of the patented original. Even when patents still apply to its drugs, Eli Lilly must still for remain vigilant in looking for any generic competitors and incur legislative costs to enforce any patent breaches.
On December 4, 2008, Eli Lilly filed a case against two Indian companies, Aurobindo Pharma and Lupin, for patent violation of its antidepressant drug Cymbalta. The infringement case is Eli Lilly's sixth outstanding patent lawsuit in the US. [21]
In January of 2009, Eli Lilly pleaded guilty to charges that it illegally marketed Zyprexa for treating dementia in the elderly, an unapproved use. The company will pay a record $1.42 billion in fines, which includes the largest criminal fines the U.S. government has ever imposed on a company. The case began in 2002 and concerned misleading marketing practices in 1999.[22]
Zyprexa competes with Pfizer's Geodon, AstraZeneca's Seroquel, Johnson & Johnson's Risperdal, and Bristol-Myers Squibb's Abilify in the antipsychotics market. A studied showed Zyprexa to be most effective in its class,[7] but the drug causes significant weight gain[6] while Geodon does not.[23]
Cymbalta competes with Forest Laboratories' Lexapro and Wyeth's Effexor in the antidepressant market, and Pfizer's Lyrica for diabetic neuropathy.[7]
Evista and Forteo compete with Merck's Fosamax and Novartis's Zometa in the osteoporosis market.[7] Amgen's Denosumab is a new contender in late stage clinical trials and may soon enter the market.
Gemzar competes with numerous chemotherapy agents, but is more tolerable than older drugs while retaining effectiveness.[7]
Humalog competes with other insulin analogs made by Novo Nordisk and Sanofi-Aventis to treat diabetes.[24] Insulin analogs mimic the role of natural insulin in regulating blood sugar and are generally all very similar in action.
Cialis competes with Pfizer's Viagra and Bayer's Levitra in the erectile dysfunction (ED) drug market. Cialis's primary competitive advantage is that it is effective for up to 36 hours on one dose, compared to the other drugs, which must be taken a short time before anticipated sexual activity.[25]
<autowikidata/>
| |||||||