Essex Property Trust 10-Q 2009
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
T QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009
£ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934>
For the transition period from ________to _________
Commission file number 001-13106
ESSEX PROPERTY TRUST, INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
925 East Meadow Drive
Palo Alto, California 94303
(Address of Principal Executive Offices including Zip Code)
(Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES T NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). YES o NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer an accelerated file, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” ”accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. Yes £ No T
APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: 28,194,620 shares of Common Stock as of August 5, 2009.>
ESSEX PROPERTY TRUST, INC.
Part I -- Financial Information
Item 1: Condensed Financial Statements (Unaudited)
"Essex" or the "Company" means Essex Property Trust, Inc., a real estate investment trust incorporated in the State of Maryland, or where the context otherwise requires, Essex Portfolio, L.P., a limited partnership (the "Operating Partnership") in which Essex Property Trust, Inc. is the sole general partner.
The information furnished in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets, statements of operations, stockholders' equity, noncontrolling interest, and comprehensive income and cash flows of the Company reflects all adjustments which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of the aforementioned condensed consolidated financial statements for the interim periods and are normal and recurring in nature, except as otherwise noted.
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the notes to such unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations herein. Additionally, these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements included in the Company's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
See accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
ESSEX PROPERTY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARES
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
See accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity, Noncontrolling Interest, and
Comprehensive Income for the six months ended June 30, 2009
(Dollars and shares in thousands)
See accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Dollars in thousands)
See accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2009 and 2008
(1) Organization and Basis of Presentation
The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company are prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q. In the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented have been included and are normal and recurring in nature, except as otherwise noted. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements included in the Company's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in the condensed consolidated financial statements.
The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 include the accounts of the Company and Essex Portfolio, L.P. (the "Operating Partnership", which holds the operating assets of the Company). See below for a description of entities consolidated by the Operating Partnership. The Company is the sole general partner in the Operating Partnership, with a 91.7% general partnership interest as of June 30, 2009. Total Operating Partnership units outstanding were 2,450,002 and 2,413,078 as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, and the redemption value of the units, based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock totaled $152.5 million and $185.2 million, as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.
As of June 30, 2009, the Company owned or had ownership interests in 133 apartment communities, (aggregating 27,143 units) (collectively, the “Communities”, and individually, a “Community”), five office and commercial buildings and four active development projects (collectively, the “Portfolio”). The Communities are located in Southern California (Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, Santa Barbara, San Diego, and Ventura counties), Northern California (the San Francisco Bay Area) and the Seattle metropolitan area.
Essex Apartment Value Fund II, L.P. (“Fund II”) is an investment fund formed by the Company to add value through rental growth and asset appreciation, utilizing the Company’s development, redevelopment and asset management capabilities.
Fund II has eight institutional investors, and the Company, with combined partner equity contributions of $265.9 million. The Company contributed $75.0 million to Fund II, which represents a 28.2% interest as general partner and limited partner. Fund II utilized leverage equal to approximately 55% upon the initial acquisition of the underlying real estate. Fund II invested in apartment communities in the Company’s targeted West Coast markets and, as of June 30, 2009, owned 13 apartment communities and one development project. The Company records revenue for its asset management, property management, development and redevelopment services when earned, and promote income when realized if Fund II exceeds certain financial return benchmarks.
As of June 30, 2009 marketable securities consisted primarily of investment-grade unsecured bonds and investment funds that invest in U.S. treasury or agency securities. As of June 30, 2009 the Company had classified the marketable securities as available for sale and the Company reports these securities at fair value, based on quoted market prices (Level 1 as defined by FAS 157 as discussed later in Note 1), and any unrealized gain or loss is recorded as other comprehensive income (loss). Realized gains and losses and interest income are included in interest and other income on the condensed consolidated statement of operations. Amortization of unearned discounts is included in interest income.
Variable Interest Entities
In accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Interpretation No. 46 Revised (“FIN 46R”), “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an Interpretation of ARB No. 51”, the Company consolidates 19 DownREIT limited partnerships (comprising twelve communities), a development project, an office building that is subject to loans made by the Company, and 55 low income housing units. Total DownREIT units outstanding were 1,137,623 and 1,148,510 as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 respectively, and the redemption value of the units, based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock totaled $70.8 million and $88.1 million, as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. The Company consolidates these entities because it is deemed the primary beneficiary under FIN 46R. The consolidated total assets and liabilities related to these variable interest entities (“VIEs”), net of intercompany eliminations, were approximately $281.8 million and $170.0 million, respectively, as of June 30, 2009 and $256.0 million and $169.1 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2008. Interest holders in VIEs consolidated by the Company are allocated net income equal to the cash payments made to those interest holders or distributions from cash flow. The remaining results of operations are generally allocated to the Company. As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the Company did not have any VIE’s of which it was not deemed to be the primary beneficiary.
The Company accounts for share based compensation using the fair value method of accounting. The estimated fair value of stock options granted by the Company is being amortized over the vesting period of the stock options. The estimated grant date fair values of the long term incentive plan units (discussed in Note 13, “Stock Based Compensation Plans,” in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008) are being amortized over the expected service periods.
Stock-based compensation expense for options and restricted stock totaled $0.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, and $0.5 million and $0.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The intrinsic value of the stock options exercised during the three months ended June 30, 2008 totaled $2.1 million and none for 2009, and $0.4 million and $2.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 respectively. As of June 30, 2009, the intrinsic value of the stock options outstanding and fully vested totaled $1.1 million. As of June 30, 2009, total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested share-based compensation granted under the stock option and restricted stock plans totaled $3.0 million. The cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2 to 5 years for the stock option plans and is expected to be recognized straight-line over 7 years for the restricted stock awards.
The Company has adopted an incentive program involving the issuance of Series Z and Series Z-1 Incentive Units (collectively referred to as “Z Units”) of limited partnership interest in the Operating Partnership. Stock-based compensation expense for Z Units totaled $0.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and $0.8 million for the six months ended June 20, 2009 and 2008.
Stock-based compensation capitalized for stock options, restricted stock awards, and the Z Units totaled $0.1 million and $0.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and $0.2 million and $0.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. As of June 30, 2009, the intrinsic value of the Z Units subject to future vesting totaled $7.3 million. As of June 30, 2009, total unrecognized compensation cost related to Z Units subject to future vesting granted under the Z Units totaled $5.4 million. The unamortized cost is expected to be recognized over the next 2 to 10 years subject to the achievement of the stated performance criteria.
Stock-based compensation expense for the Outperformance Plan, (the “OPP”) adopted in December 2007 totaled approximately $0.3 million for three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively and $0.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008. Total unrecognized compensation cost less an estimate for forfeitures related to the OPP totaled $3.5 million and $4.1 million as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. The unamortized cost is recognized over the expected service period of five years for senior officers and three years for non-employee directors.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The Company adopted SFAS 157, “Fair Value Measurements” as of January 1, 2008, which provides guidance on using fair value to measure assets and liabilities. The Company values its financial instruments based on the fair value hierarchy of valuation techniques described in SFAS 157. Level 1 inputs are unadjusted, quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities at the measurement date. Level 2 inputs include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets and inputs other than quoted prices observable for the asset or liability. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability.
The Company uses Level 1 inputs for the fair values of its cash equivalents and its marketable securities except for unsecured bonds. The Company uses Level 2 inputs for its investments in unsecured bonds, notes receivable, notes payable, and cash flow hedges. These inputs include interest rates for similar financial instruments. The Company’s valuation methodology under SFAS 157 for cash flow hedges is described in more detail in note 8. The Company does not use Level 3 inputs to estimate fair values of any of its financial instruments. The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to the asset or liability.
Management believes that the carrying amounts of its variable rate mortgage notes payable, amounts outstanding under lines of credit, notes receivable and other receivables from related parties, and notes and other receivables approximate fair value as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, because interest rates, yields and other terms for these instruments are consistent with yields and other terms currently available for similar instruments. Management has estimated that the fair value of the Company’s $1.42 billion of fixed debt at June 30, 2009 is approximately $1.42 billion and the fair value of the Company’s $239.9 million of variable rate debt at June 30, 2009 is $263.1 million based on the terms of existing mortgage notes payable and variable rate demand notes compared to those available in the marketplace. Management believes that the carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, other liabilities and dividends payable approximate fair value as of June 30, 2009 due to the short-term maturity of these instruments. Marketable securities and cash flow hedge liabilities are carried at fair value as of June 30, 2009, as discussed further above and in Note 8.
Accounting Estimates and Reclassifications
The preparation of condensed consolidated financial statements, in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, requires the Company to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, the Company evaluates its estimates, including those related to acquiring, developing and assessing the carrying values of its real estate properties, its investments in and advances to joint ventures and affiliates, its notes receivables and its qualification as a Real Estate Investment Trust (“REIT”). The Company bases its estimates on historical experience, current market conditions, and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may vary from those estimates and those estimates could be different under different assumptions or conditions. Reclassifications for discontinued operations and noncontrolling interest have been made to prior year statements of operations balances in order to conform to current year presentation. Such reclassifications have no impact on reported earnings, cash flows, total assets or total liabilities.
New Accounting Pronouncements and the Resulting Restatements of Previously Reported Amounts
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements” (“FAS 160”). FAS 160 establishes accounting and reporting standards that require the ownership interests in subsidiaries held by parties other than the parent be clearly identified, labeled, and presented in the consolidated balance sheet within equity, but separate from the parent’s equity; the amount of consolidated net income attributable to the parent and to the noncontrolling interest be clearly identified and presented on the face of the consolidated statement of operations; changes in a parent’s ownership interest while the parent retains its controlling financial interest in its subsidiary be accounted for consistently; when a subsidiary is deconsolidated, any retained noncontrolling equity investment in the former subsidiary be initially measured at fair value; and entities provide sufficient disclosures that clearly identify and distinguish between the interests of the parent and the interests of the noncontrolling owners. FAS 160 is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008. As summarized in the table below, the accompanying 2008 condensed consolidated financial statements have been restated to record the impact of adoption of FAS 160.
In May 2008, the FASB issued FASB staff position APB 14-1, “Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments That May be Settled in cash upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash Settlement)” (“APB 14-1”). APB 14-1 requires the issuer of certain convertible debt instruments that may be settled in cash (or other assets) upon conversion separately account for the liability (debt) and equity (conversion option) components of the instruments in a manner that reflects the issuer’s nonconvertible debt borrowing rate. APB 14-1 requires the initial debt proceeds from the sale of a company’s convertible debt instrument to be allocated between the liability component and the equity component. The resulting debt discount will be amortized over the period during which the debt is expected to be outstanding (i.e., through the first optional redemption dates) as additional non-cash interest expense. APB 14-1 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Accounting for the Company’s $225.0 million exchangeable bonds (the “Bonds”) with a coupon rate of 3.625% due November 2025, which were issued in the fourth quarter of 2005, was impacted by APB 14-1. During the fourth quarter of 2008, the Company repurchased $53.3 million of the Bonds, and during the first quarter of 2009 the Company repurchased an additional $71.3 million of the Bonds.
On January 1, 2009, the Company retrospectively adopted APB 14-1 for the Bonds. The Company estimated that the market interest rate for the debt only portion of the Bonds as of the date of issuance was 5.75%, compared to the coupon rate of 3.625%. The Company computed the estimated fair value of the debt portion of the Bonds as the present value of the expected cash flows discounted at 5.75%. The difference between the fair value of the debt portion of the Bonds and the carrying value as previously reported was added to additional paid in capital as of the date of issuance. The discount on the debt is amortized over the period from issuance to the date of the first call option by the holders of the Bonds which occurs in November 2010 resulting in non-cash interest expense in addition to the interest expense calculated based on the coupon rate. This resulted in non-cash interest charges of $0.5 million and $1.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and $1.1 million and $2.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. APB 14-1 requires that the fair value of the debt portion of any bonds that are retired early be estimated to calculate the gain on retirement. The difference between the estimated fair value of the debt portion of the Bonds and the APB 14-1 carrying value of the debt portion of the Bonds is recorded as gain on early retirement of debt and additional paid in capital is reduced to reflect the remaining portion of the total amount paid to retire the Bonds.
The following is a summary of the impact to the December 31, 2008 consolidated balance sheet and the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 consolidated statement of operations from amounts previously reported to amounts included in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements as a result of the retrospective adoption of FAS 160 and APB 14-1 (in thousands except per share amounts):
In December 2007, the FASB issued revised SFAS No. 141, “Business Combinations” (“FAS 141(R)”). FAS141(R) establishes principles and requirements for how the acquirer recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree; recognizes and measures the goodwill acquired in a business combination or a gain from a bargain purchase; and determines what information to disclose to enable users of the financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business combination. FAS 141(R) is effective for business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. The adoption of this standard on January 1, 2009 did not have any impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows as it relates only to business combinations for the Company that take place on or after January 1, 2009.
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 167, "Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R), which amends Interpretation 46(R) to replace the quantitative-based risks and rewards calculation for determining which enterprise, if any, has a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity with an approach focused on identifying which enterprise has the power to direct the activities of a variable interest entity that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance and (1) the obligation to absorb losses of the entity or (2) the right to receive benefits from the entity. An approach that is expected to be primarily qualitative will be more effective for identifying which enterprise has a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity. This Statement shall be effective as of the beginning of each reporting entity’s first annual reporting period that begins after November 15, 2009, for interim periods within that first annual reporting period, and for interim and annual reporting periods thereafter. Earlier application is prohibited. Management is currently evaluating the impact FAS 167 will have on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.
(2) Significant Transactions
During the second quarter, the Company sold Mountain View Apartments, a 106-unit community located in Camarillo, California for $14.0 million and recognized a gain of $0.8 million.
During the second quarter, the Company issued 1,145,450 shares of common stock at an average price of $67.21 for $75.8 million, net of fees and commissions through the Company’s Controlled Equity Offering Program.
(c) Debt and Financing Activities
The Company, during the second quarter, obtained fixed rate mortgage loans totaling $54.2 million, including the following:
Additionally, during the second quarter, the Company paid-off $21.0 million in loans secured by Huntington Breakers including a $4.4 million mortgage loan at a fixed rate of 7.7% and variable rate demand notes totaling $16.0 million.
(d) Marketable Securities
During the second quarter, with funds generated from the issuance of common stock and new mortgage loans the Company purchased $81.9 million of investment-grade unsecured bonds. As of June 30, 2009, the Company owns $105.9 million in investment-grade unsecured bonds with an average maturity of 3.8 years and an average yield of 10.3%. In total, the Company owned $115.4 million in marketable securities as of June 30, 2009.
The Company has joint venture investments in co-investments, which are accounted for under the equity method. The joint ventures own, operate and develop apartment communities. The following table details the Company's co-investments (dollars in thousands):
During 2006, the Company made a contribution to a development with a joint venture partner totaling $3.4 million, and over the past three years the Company made additional contributions and capitalized costs to this joint venture totaling $2.4 million for a total investment of $5.8 million. This joint venture was to obtain entitlements and make option payments towards the purchase of land parcels in Marina del Rey, California for a proposed development project. During the first quarter of 2009, the Company wrote-off its investment in the joint venture development project of $5.8 million, and the write-off of these costs is included in the accompanying consolidated condensed statements of operations.
The combined summarized balance sheet and statements of operations for co-investments, which are accounted for under the equity method, are as follows (dollars in thousands).
In January 2008, the Company received $7.5 million and recognized $6.3 million of preferred interest in the joint venture which is included in equity income in co-investments from the repayment of its investment in Mountain Vista Apartments, LLC.
(4) Notes and Other Receivables
Notes receivable secured by real estate, and other receivables consist of the following as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 (dollars in thousands):
In September 2007, the Company originated a loan to the owners of an apartment community under development in Vancouver, Washington, with a maturity date of February 2009. The proceeds from the loan refinanced the property and provided funding for the completion of the 146-unit apartment community. In July 2008, the Company ceased recording interest income and issued a notice of monetary default to the borrower, and the borrower filed for bankruptcy. During the fourth quarter of 2008, the Company recorded a loan loss reserve in the amount of $0.7 million on this non-performing note receivable. During the second quarter 2009, the property was under contract to be sold to a third-party and as a result the expected net proceeds to be generated from sale caused the Company to record an additional loan loss reserve in the amount of $0.4 million.
In the second quarter of 2009, the borrower on the loan secured by Emeryville Marketplace, a mixed use commercial property located in Emeryville, California made a principal payment of $0.5 million to pay down the loan to $6.8 million and the Company extended the maturity of the loan until June 2010. In the first quarter of 2009, the borrower on the bridge loan secured by 301 Ocean Avenue a 47-unit apartment community located in Santa Monica, California made a principal payment of $1.6 million to pay down the loan to $12.5 million and the Company extended the maturity of the loan until December 2010.
(5) Related Party Transactions
Management and other fees from affiliates includes management, development and redevelopment fees from Fund II of $1.2 million and $1.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 respectively, and $2.4 million and $2.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 respectively. As discussed in Note 3, in January 2008, the Company received $7.5 million from an investment held in an affiliate of TMMC and recognized $6.3 million of preferred income which is included in equity income from co-investments.
(6) Segment Information
The Company defines its reportable operating segments as the three geographical regions in which its apartment communities are located: Southern California, Northern California and Seattle Metro. Excluded from segment revenues are properties classified in discontinued operations, management and other fees from affiliates, and interest and other income. Non-segment revenues and net operating income included in the following schedule also consist of revenue generated from commercial properties which are primarily office buildings. Other non-segment assets include co-investments, real estate under development, cash and cash equivalents, marketable securities, notes receivable, other assets and deferred charges. The revenues, net operating income, and assets for each of the reportable operating segments are summarized as follows for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 (dollars in thousands):
The revenues, net operating income, and assets for each of the reportable operating segments are summarized as follows for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 (dollars in thousands):
(7) Net Income Per Common Share>
(Amounts in thousands, except per share and unit data)
The holders of the exchangeable notes may exchange, at the then applicable exchange rate, the notes for cash and, at the Company’s option, a portion of the notes may be exchanged for Essex common stock; the original exchange rate was $103.25 per share of Essex common stock. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 the weighted average common stock price did not exceed the strike price (which was $101.54 as of June 30, 2008) and therefore common stock issuable upon exchange of the exchangeable notes was not included in the diluted share count as the effect was anti-dilutive.
Stock options of 263,721 and 53,579 for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and 265,685 and 76,737 for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, were not included in the diluted earnings per share calculation because the exercise price of the options were greater than the average market price of the common shares for the three months ended and, therefore, were anti-dilutive. Stock options of 22,386 and 131,549 for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and 22,937 and 137,848 were included in the determination of diluted EPS.
All shares of cumulative convertible preferred stock Series G have been excluded from diluted earnings per share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, as the effect was anti-dilutive.
(8) Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
Currently, the Company uses interest rate swaps and interest rate cap contracts to manage certain interest rate risks. The valuation of these instruments is determined using widely accepted valuation techniques including discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of each derivative. This analysis reflects the contractual terms of the derivatives, including the period to maturity, and uses observable market-based inputs, including interest rate curves. The fair values of interest rate swaps are determined using the market standard methodology of netting the discounted future fixed cash receipts (or payments) and the discounted expected variable cash payments (or receipts). The variable cash payments (or receipts) are based on an expectation of future interest rates (forward curves) derived from observable market interest rate curves. To comply with the provisions of SFAS No. 157, the Company incorporates credit valuation adjustments to appropriately reflect both its own nonperformance risk and the respective counterparty’s nonperformance risk in the fair value measurements.
As of June 30, 2009 the Company had seven forward-starting interest rate swap contracts totaling a notional amount of $375.0 million with interest rates ranging from 5.1% to 5.9% and settlements dates ranging from October 2010 to October 2011. These derivatives qualify for hedge accounting as they are expected to economically hedge the cash flows associated with future financing of debt between 2010 and 2011. The Company had twelve interest rate cap contracts totaling a notional amount of $183.4 million that qualify for hedge accounting as they effectively limit the Company’s exposure to interest rate risk by providing a ceiling on the underlying variable interest rate for the Company’s $220.1 million of tax exempt variable rate debt. The aggregate carrying value of the forward-starting interest rate swap contracts was a net liability of $31.4 million and the aggregate carrying value of the interest rate cap contracts was an asset of $0.4 million. The overall fair value of the derivatives changed by $42.1 million during the six months ended June 30, 2009 to a net liability of $31.0 million as of June 30, 2009, and the derivative liability was recorded in cash flow hedge liabilities in the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements. The changes in the fair values of the derivatives are reflected in other comprehensive (loss) income in the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements. No hedge ineffectiveness on cash flow hedges was recognized during the quarter ended June 30, 2009 and 2008.
(9) Discontinued Operations
In the normal course of business, the Company will receive offers for sale of its communities, either solicited or unsolicited. For those offers that are accepted, the prospective buyer will usually require a due diligence period before consummation of the transaction. It is not unusual for matters to arise that result in the withdrawal or rejection of the offer during this process. Essex classifies real estate as "held for sale" when all criteria under SFAS No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets" (“SFAS 144”) have been met.
During the second quarter, the Company sold Mountain View Apartments, a 106-unit community located in Camarillo, California for $14.0 million resulting in a $0.8 million gain.
In the first quarter of 2009, the Company sold Carlton Heights Villas, a 70-unit property located in Santee, California for $6.9 million resulting in a $1.6 million gain and Grand Regency, a 60-unit property in Escondido, California, for $5.0 million resulting in a $0.9 million gain.
In the fourth quarter of 2008, the Company sold Coral Gardens, a 200-unit property located in El Cajon, California for $19.8 million, and in the third quarter of 2008, the Company sold Cardiff by the Sea Apartments, located in Cardiff, California for $71.0 million and St. Cloud Apartments, located in Houston, Texas for $8.8 million. The operations for these sold communities are included in discontinued operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008.
The components of discontinued operations are outlined below and include the results of operations for the respective periods that the Company owned such assets, as described above (dollars in thousands).