XIDE » Topics » Accounting and Significant Assumptions

This excerpt taken from the XIDE 10-K filed Jun 4, 2009.
Accounting and Significant Assumptions
 
The Company accounts for pension benefits using the accrual method set forth in SFAS 158. The accrual method of accounting for pensions involves the use of actuarial assumptions concerning future events that impact estimates of the amount and timing of benefit obligations and future benefit payments.
 
Significant assumptions used in calculating the Company’s pension benefit obligations and related expense are the discount rate, rate of compensation increase, and the expected long-term rate of return on plan


38


Table of Contents

assets. The Company establishes these underlying assumptions in consultation with its actuaries. Depending on the assumptions used, pension obligations and related expense could vary within a range of outcomes and have a material effect on the Company’s results, benefit obligations, and cash funding requirements.
 
The discount rates used by the Company for determining benefit obligations are generally based on high quality corporate bonds and reflect the cash flows of the respective plans. The assumed rates of compensation increases reflect estimates of the projected change in compensation levels based on future expectations, general price levels, productivity, and historical experience, among other factors. In evaluating the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets, the Company considers the allocation of assets and the expected return on various asset classes in the context of the long-term nature of pension obligations.
 
At March 31, 2009, the Company had increased the discount rates used to value its pension benefit obligations to reflect the increase in yields on high quality corporate bonds, and decreased the rate of compensation increases to reflect current inflationary expectations. The aggregate effect of these changes decreased the present value of projected benefit obligations as of March 31, 2009.
 
A one-percentage point change in the weighted average expected return on plan assets for defined benefit plans would change net periodic benefit cost by approximately $4.3 million in fiscal 2009. A one-percentage point increase in the weighted average discount rate would decrease net periodic benefit cost for defined benefit plans by approximately $3.4 million in fiscal 2009. A one-percentage point decrease in the weighted average discount rate would increase net periodic benefit cost for defined benefit plans by approximately $1.5 million in fiscal 2009.
 
As of March 31, 2009, net losses for the Company’s defined benefit pension and other post-retirement benefit plans were $41.3 million, compared to gains of $58.3 million at March 31, 2008. The losses during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009 are principally due to the actual asset losses on the funded plans arrangements in the U.S. and U.K, reflecting the current economic environment in fiscal 2009. SFAS 158 provides for delayed recognition of such actuarial gains/losses, whereby these gains/losses, to the extent they exceed 10% of the greater of the projected benefit obligation or the market related value of plan assets are amortized as a component of pension expense over a period that approximates the average remaining service period of active employees. For further discussion, see Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
 
This excerpt taken from the XIDE 10-K filed Jun 9, 2008.
Accounting and Significant Assumptions
 
The Company accounts for pension benefits using the accrual method set forth in SFAS 87. The accrual method of accounting for pensions involves the use of actuarial assumptions concerning future events that impact estimates of the amount and timing of benefit obligations and future benefit payments.
 
Significant assumptions used in calculating the Company’s pension benefit obligations and related expense are the discount rate, rate of compensation increase, and the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets. The Company establishes these underlying assumptions in consultation with its actuaries. Depending on the assumptions used, pension obligations and related expense could vary within a range of outcomes and have a material effect on the Company’s results, benefit obligations, and cash funding requirements.
 
The discount rates used by the Company for determining benefit obligations are generally based on high quality corporate bonds and reflect the cash flows of the respective plans. The assumed rates of compensation increases reflect estimates of the projected change in compensation levels based on future expectations, general price levels, productivity, and historical experience, among other factors. In evaluating the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets, the Company considers the allocation of assets and the expected return on various asset classes in the context of the long-term nature of pension obligations.
 
At March 31, 2008, the Company had increased the discount rates used to value its pension benefit obligations to reflect the increase in yields on high quality corporate bonds, and increased the rate of compensation increases to reflect current inflationary expectations. The aggregate effect of these changes decreased the present value of projected benefit obligations as of March 31, 2008 and had the effect of decreasing pension expense in fiscal 2009. Pension expense for the Company’s defined benefit pension and other post-retirement benefit plans was $12.3 million in fiscal 2008 compared to $18.7 million in fiscal 2007.
 
A one-percentage point change in the weighted average expected return on plan assets for defined benefit plans would change net periodic benefit cost by approximately $4.3 million in fiscal 2008. A one-percentage point increase in the weighted average discount rate would decrease net periodic benefit cost for defined benefit plans by approximately $1.9 million in fiscal 2008. A one-percentage point decrease in the weighted average discount rate would increase net periodic benefit cost for defined benefit plans by approximately $2.8 million in fiscal 2008.
 
As of March 31, 2008, actuarial gain for the Company’s defined benefit pension and other post-retirement benefit plans were $58.3 million, compared to gains of $12.8 million at March 31, 2007. The actuarial gains during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2008 principally reflect increase in discount rates in the UK, Germany, and the U.S. in 2008. SFAS 87 provides for delayed recognition of such actuarial gains/losses, whereby these gains/losses, to the extent they exceed 10% of the greater of the projected benefit obligation or the market related value of plan assets are amortized as a component of pension expense over a period that approximates the average remaining service period of active employees.
 
This excerpt taken from the XIDE 10-K filed Jun 11, 2007.
Accounting And Significant Assumptions
 
The Company accounts for pension benefits using the accrual method set forth in SFAS 87. The accrual method of accounting for pensions involves the use of actuarial assumptions concerning future events that impact estimates of the amount and timing of benefit obligations and future benefit payments.
 
Significant assumptions used in calculating the Company’s pension benefit obligations and related expense are the discount rate, rate of compensation increase, and the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets. The Company establishes these underlying assumptions in consultation with its actuaries. Depending on the assumptions used, pension obligations and related expense could vary within a range of outcomes and have a material effect on the Company’s results, benefit obligations, and cash funding requirements.
 
The discount rates used by the Company for determining benefit obligations are generally based on high quality corporate bonds and reflect the cash flows of the respective plans. The assumed rates of compensation increases reflect estimates of the projected change in compensation levels based on future expectations, general price levels, productivity and historical experience, among other factors. In evaluating the expected long term rate of return on plan assets, the Company considers the allocation of assets and the expected return on various asset classes in the context of the long-term nature of pension obligations.
 
At March 31, 2007, the Company had slightly increased the discount rates used to value its pension benefit obligations to reflect the increase in yields on high quality corporate bonds, and increased the rate of compensation increases to reflect current inflationary expectations. The aggregate effect of these changes


45


Table of Contents

decreased the present value of projected benefit obligations as of March 31, 2007 and had the effect of decreasing pension expense in fiscal 2008. In addition, the plan freeze in the U.S. which ceased pension accruals for more than half the year reduced the pension expense for fiscal 2007 by $3.8 million. Pension expense for the Company’s defined benefit pension and other post-retirement benefit plans was $18.7 million in fiscal 2007 compared to $23.9 million in fiscal 2006.
 
A one-percentage point change in the weighted average expected return on plan assets for defined benefit plans would change net periodic benefit cost by approximately $3.6 million in fiscal 2007. A one-percentage point increase in the weighted average discount rate would decrease net periodic benefit cost for defined benefit plans by approximately $2.8 million in fiscal 2007. A one-percentage point decrease in the weighted average discount rate would increase net periodic benefit cost for defined benefit plans by approximately $5.5 million in fiscal 2007.
 
As of March 31, 2007, actuarial gains for the Company’s defined benefit pension and other post-retirement benefit plans were $12.8 million, compared to losses of $17.2 million at March 31, 2006. The actuarial gains during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007 principally reflect increases in discount rates in the UK and the U.S. in 2007. SFAS 87 provides for delayed recognition of such actuarial gains/losses, whereby these gains/losses, to the extent they exceed 10% of the greater of the projected benefit obligation or the market related value of plan assets are amortized as a component of pension expense over a period that approximates the average remaining service period of active employees.
 
This excerpt taken from the XIDE 10-K filed Jun 29, 2005.

Accounting and Significant Assumptions

 

The Company accounts for pension benefits using the accrual method set forth in SFAS 87, “Employers Accounting for Pensions”. The accrual method of accounting for pensions involves the use of actuarial assumptions concerning future events that impact estimates of the amount and timing of benefit obligations and future benefit payments.

 

The Company’s adoption of Fresh Start reporting in accordance with SOP 90-7 upon emergence from bankruptcy on the Effective Date had a significant impact on the Company’s net amount recognized for pension benefits. All previously unrecognized net actuarial losses, transition obligation and prior service cost were recognized as of the Effective Date.

 

Significant assumptions used in calculating the Company’s pension benefit obligations and related expense are the discount rate, rate of compensation increase and the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets. The Company establishes these underlying assumptions in consultation with its actuaries. Depending on the assumptions used, pension obligations and related expense could vary within a range of outcomes and have a material effect on reported results, benefit obligations and cash funding requirements.

 

The discount rates used by the Company for determining benefit obligations are generally based on high quality corporate bonds. The assumed rates of compensation increases reflect estimates of the projected change in compensation levels based on future expectations, general price levels, productivity and historical experience, among other factors. In evaluating the expected long term rate of return on plan assets, the Company considers the allocation of assets and the expected return on various asset classes in the context of the long-term nature of pension obligations.

 

A one-percentage point change in the weighted average expected return on plan assets would change net periodic benefit cost by approximately $2,900 in fiscal 2005. A one-percentage point change in the weighted average discount rate would change net periodic benefit cost by approximately $6,300 in fiscal 2005.

 

At March 31, 2005, the Company has lowered the discount rates used to value its pension benefit obligations to reflect the decline in yields on high quality corporate bonds. As of March 31, 2005, the Company lowered the rate of compensation increase to reflect current inflationary expectations and lowered the expected long term return on plan assets in light of market conditions and recent equity market performance. The aggregate effect of these changes increased the present value of future benefit obligations as of March 31, 2005 and had the effect of increasing pension expense in fiscal 2005. The adoption of Fresh Start reporting resulted in the recognition of all previously unrecognized actuarial losses at the Effective Date and reduced the net periodic benefit cost from amortization of actuarial losses. Pension expense for its defined benefit pension plans was $24,630 in fiscal 2005 compared to $34,650 in fiscal 2004, reflecting the impact of these changes.

 

As of March 31, 2005, unrecognized actuarial losses for the Company’s defined benefit plans were $24,290, compared to $184,779 at March 31, 2004. As described above, all previously unrecognized actuarial losses were recognized on adoption of Fresh Start reporting. The unrecognized actuarial losses at March 31, 2005 principally reflect the reduction in discount rates since the Effective Date. SFAS 87 provides for delayed recognition of such actuarial losses, whereby these losses, to the extent they exceed 10% of the greater of the projected benefit obligation or the market related value of plan assets are amortized as a component of pension expense over a period that approximates the average remaining service period of active employees (for the Company a period of approximately 10 years), unless and to the extent they are not offset by actuarial gains in future years.

 

40


Table of Contents
This excerpt taken from the XIDE 10-K filed Mar 1, 2005.

Accounting and Significant Assumptions

 

The Company accounts for pension benefits using the accrual method set forth in SFAS 87, “Employers Accounting for Pensions”. The accrual method of accounting for pensions involves the use of actuarial assumptions concerning future events that impact estimates of the amount and timing of benefit obligations and future benefit payments.

 

The significant assumptions used in calculating the Company’s pension benefit obligations and related expense are the discount rate, rate of compensation increase and the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets. The Company establishes these underlying assumptions in consultation with its actuaries. Depending on the assumptions used, pension obligations and related expense could vary within a range of outcomes and have a material effect on reported results, benefit obligations and cash funding requirements.

 

The discount rates used by the Company for determining benefit obligations are generally based on high quality corporate bonds. The assumed rate of compensation increase reflects an estimate of the projected change in compensation levels based on future expectations, general price levels, productivity and historical experience, among other factors. In evaluating the expected long term rate of return on plan assets, the Company considers the allocation of assets and the expected return on various asset classes in the context of the long-term nature of pension obligations.

 

A one-percentage point change in the weighted average expected return on plan assets would change net periodic benefit cost by approximately $2,400 in fiscal 2004. A one-percentage point change in the weighted average discount rate would change net periodic benefit cost by approximately $6,000 in fiscal 2004.

 

At March 31, 2004 and March 31, 2003, the Company has lowered the discount rates used to value its pension benefit obligations to reflect the decline in yields on high quality corporate bonds. As of March 31, 2003, the Company lowered the rate of compensation increase to reflect current inflationary expectations and lowered the expected long term return on plan assets in light of market conditions and recent equity market performance. The aggregate effect of these changes increased the present value of future benefit obligations as of March 31, 2004 and had the effect of increasing pension expense in fiscal 2004. Pension expense for its defined benefit pension plans was $34,650 in fiscal 2004 compared to $23,917 in fiscal 2003, reflecting the impact of these changes, as well as amortization of previously unrecognized actuarial losses described below.

 

As of March 31, 2004, unrecognized actuarial losses for the Company’s defined benefit plans were $184,779, compared to $164,457 at March 31, 2003. The unrecognized actuarial losses principally reflect declines in the fair market value of plan assets, actual asset return experience falling short of actuarial assumptions and the reduction in discount rates since fiscal 2002. SFAS 87 provides for delayed recognition of such actuarial losses, whereby these losses, to the extent they exceed 10% of the greater of the projected benefit obligation or the market related value of plan assets are amortized as a component of pension expense over a period that approximates the average remaining service period of active employees (for the Company a period of approximately 10 years), unless and to the extent they are not offset by actuarial gains in future years. The amortization of actuarial losses increased pension expense by approximately $5,800 in fiscal 2004 from 2003.

 

15


Table of Contents
Wikinvest © 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012. Use of this site is subject to express Terms of Service, Privacy Policy, and Disclaimer. By continuing past this page, you agree to abide by these terms. Any information provided by Wikinvest, including but not limited to company data, competitors, business analysis, market share, sales revenues and other operating metrics, earnings call analysis, conference call transcripts, industry information, or price targets should not be construed as research, trading tips or recommendations, or investment advice and is provided with no warrants as to its accuracy. Stock market data, including US and International equity symbols, stock quotes, share prices, earnings ratios, and other fundamental data is provided by data partners. Stock market quotes delayed at least 15 minutes for NASDAQ, 20 mins for NYSE and AMEX. Market data by Xignite. See data providers for more details. Company names, products, services and branding cited herein may be trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners. The use of trademarks or service marks of another is not a representation that the other is affiliated with, sponsors, is sponsored by, endorses, or is endorsed by Wikinvest.
Powered by MediaWiki